This document provides an overview of joint and special operations doctrine, including key joint publications, changes to USSOCOM doctrine, roles and functions of USSOCOM, the combatant commands, military departments, and command relationships like combatant command, operational control, tactical control, and support. It defines these concepts and the authorities granted by each type of relationship.
The document discusses the roles and responsibilities of various leadership positions in the Navy, including the Commander in Chief, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Navy, Chief of Naval Operations, Fleet Commander in Charge, Type Commander, Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy, Fleet Master Chief, Force Master Chief, and Command Master Chief. It also describes various Navy programs, documents, and terms such as the CCRI, EDVR, ODCR, AMD, evaluation reports, service records, SITREPs, the IG, Navy Correspondence Manual, PTS Program, DLPT, duties of the Command ESO, the Navy's drug screening program, and the six programs of Brilliant on the Basics.
D
E
P
A
O
T
M
EN
T F THE
A
R
M
Y
•
•
E
U
N
I
T
E
D
S TAT S O
A
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
R
T
H
I S W E ' LL
D E F E N D
Joint Publication 5-0
Joint Planning
16 June 2017
This edition of Joint Publication (JP) 5-0, Joint Planning, reflects current doctrine for
conducting joint, interagency, and multinational planning activities across the range of
military operations. This keystone publication is part of the core of joint doctrine and
establishes the planning framework for our forces’ ability to fight and win as a joint team.
As our military continues to serve and protect our Nation in the complex environment of
global competition and conflict, we must continually refine our doctrine and update our
planning practices based upon those experiences and lessons learned. Our understanding of
operations across the spectrum of conflict and the information needed by senior leaders to
make strategic and operational-level decisions, developed during the planning process has
evolved. This update to JP 5-0 ensures all our operations benefit from the application of our
doctrinal planning processes.
Likewise, the practice of Adaptive Planning and Execution has continued to evolve since
the last publication of JP 5-0. This publication provides necessary updates to that process, as
our combatant commands have continued to develop the ability to provide military options
for contingencies. Therefore, we seek to develop tools that allow for more rapid development,
review, and refinement of plans at the accelerated pace the world requires today.
Given that the operational environment is not simple or static, adaptation and flexibility
are necessary in planning and execution. This edition of JP 5-0 seeks to provide joint force
commanders and their component commanders with processes that allow for that flexibility
and the ability to plan and develop plans for an uncertain and challenging environment.
Our Armed Forces serve to support our national leadership in attaining national
objectives. I encourage leaders to ensure their organizations understand and use joint doctrine
and this Joint Publication in particular as you continue to assist our Nation in advancing its
enduring interests.
For the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
KEVIN D. SCOTT
Vice Admiral, USN
Director, Joint Force Development
i
PREFACE
1. Scope
This publication is the keystone document for joint planning. It provides the doctrinal
foundation and fundamental principles that guide the Armed Forces of the United States in
planning joint campaigns and operations.
2. Purpose
This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance
of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations
for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, .
JP 4-02, Health Services Support; Exec SummaryShayne Morris
This Power Point is part of an Enlisted Advancement Program training series for US Navy Corpsman rating provided by Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Virginia
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth is a military treatment facility serving active duty service members, their dependents and retirees in the Hampton Roads community of southeastern Virginia and northeastern North Carolina.
The document provides an overview of the 2004 National Military Strategy (NMS). It discusses how the NMS is linked to other national strategic guidance and outlines the strategic principles of agility, decisiveness, and integration that the NMS is based on. The NMS focuses on protecting the US through active defense in depth, preventing conflict and surprise attack, and prevailing against adversaries. It also discusses the implications for joint force capabilities and force sizing. Areas for further development discussed include improving interagency integration and roles in conflict prevention.
This document provides a summary of Tad John Steckler's work experience and qualifications. It lists his roles as a Senior PSO Trainer with MPRI/Engility providing soldier skills training in Africa from 2010 to present, as a Team Leader with MPRI in Afghanistan from 2009 to 2010, as a Lane Safety Operator Supervisor at Fort Riley, Kansas from 2008 to 2009, and as an Intelligence Sergeant and First Sergeant with the 1st Engineer Battalion at Fort Riley from 2008 to 2006. It also provides details of his education and vocational training, as well as a list of awards and qualifications including airborne and air assault badges.
- Amphibious operations require forces to operate across air, land, and sea within the littorals. They transition ready combat forces from sea to shore to achieve advantage over the enemy.
- Characteristics include integration of amphibious task force and landing force, gaining access to operational areas, task organizing based on mission, and unity of effort. Certain operations exploit surprise and apply combat power precisely.
- Command and control structures are established to coordinate forces during planning, movement, and action phases. Transition of control from sea to shore and back is addressed.
- Planning considers decisions on timing, location, and methods to project forces. Embarkation,
This document provides the doctrine for joint amphibious operations conducted by the US Armed Forces. It establishes fundamental principles and guidelines for amphibious operations, including command and control, planning processes, intelligence support, communications support, fire support, and logistics planning. The document is intended to govern joint activities during amphibious operations and provide overarching military guidance for combatant commanders and joint force commanders conducting amphibious operations.
The document is an Operational Groups Field Manual from the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) dated April 25, 1944. It outlines the organization, missions, and operations of Operational Groups (OGs), which were small, specially trained military units organized by OSS to accomplish missions like organizing resistance groups and guerrilla warfare. The manual discusses the organization of OGs in Washington DC and in the field, including personnel recruitment and qualifications, as well as training, operations, and cooperation with other organizations.
The document discusses the roles and responsibilities of various leadership positions in the Navy, including the Commander in Chief, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Navy, Chief of Naval Operations, Fleet Commander in Charge, Type Commander, Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy, Fleet Master Chief, Force Master Chief, and Command Master Chief. It also describes various Navy programs, documents, and terms such as the CCRI, EDVR, ODCR, AMD, evaluation reports, service records, SITREPs, the IG, Navy Correspondence Manual, PTS Program, DLPT, duties of the Command ESO, the Navy's drug screening program, and the six programs of Brilliant on the Basics.
D
E
P
A
O
T
M
EN
T F THE
A
R
M
Y
•
•
E
U
N
I
T
E
D
S TAT S O
A
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
R
T
H
I S W E ' LL
D E F E N D
Joint Publication 5-0
Joint Planning
16 June 2017
This edition of Joint Publication (JP) 5-0, Joint Planning, reflects current doctrine for
conducting joint, interagency, and multinational planning activities across the range of
military operations. This keystone publication is part of the core of joint doctrine and
establishes the planning framework for our forces’ ability to fight and win as a joint team.
As our military continues to serve and protect our Nation in the complex environment of
global competition and conflict, we must continually refine our doctrine and update our
planning practices based upon those experiences and lessons learned. Our understanding of
operations across the spectrum of conflict and the information needed by senior leaders to
make strategic and operational-level decisions, developed during the planning process has
evolved. This update to JP 5-0 ensures all our operations benefit from the application of our
doctrinal planning processes.
Likewise, the practice of Adaptive Planning and Execution has continued to evolve since
the last publication of JP 5-0. This publication provides necessary updates to that process, as
our combatant commands have continued to develop the ability to provide military options
for contingencies. Therefore, we seek to develop tools that allow for more rapid development,
review, and refinement of plans at the accelerated pace the world requires today.
Given that the operational environment is not simple or static, adaptation and flexibility
are necessary in planning and execution. This edition of JP 5-0 seeks to provide joint force
commanders and their component commanders with processes that allow for that flexibility
and the ability to plan and develop plans for an uncertain and challenging environment.
Our Armed Forces serve to support our national leadership in attaining national
objectives. I encourage leaders to ensure their organizations understand and use joint doctrine
and this Joint Publication in particular as you continue to assist our Nation in advancing its
enduring interests.
For the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
KEVIN D. SCOTT
Vice Admiral, USN
Director, Joint Force Development
i
PREFACE
1. Scope
This publication is the keystone document for joint planning. It provides the doctrinal
foundation and fundamental principles that guide the Armed Forces of the United States in
planning joint campaigns and operations.
2. Purpose
This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance
of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations
for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, .
JP 4-02, Health Services Support; Exec SummaryShayne Morris
This Power Point is part of an Enlisted Advancement Program training series for US Navy Corpsman rating provided by Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Virginia
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth is a military treatment facility serving active duty service members, their dependents and retirees in the Hampton Roads community of southeastern Virginia and northeastern North Carolina.
The document provides an overview of the 2004 National Military Strategy (NMS). It discusses how the NMS is linked to other national strategic guidance and outlines the strategic principles of agility, decisiveness, and integration that the NMS is based on. The NMS focuses on protecting the US through active defense in depth, preventing conflict and surprise attack, and prevailing against adversaries. It also discusses the implications for joint force capabilities and force sizing. Areas for further development discussed include improving interagency integration and roles in conflict prevention.
This document provides a summary of Tad John Steckler's work experience and qualifications. It lists his roles as a Senior PSO Trainer with MPRI/Engility providing soldier skills training in Africa from 2010 to present, as a Team Leader with MPRI in Afghanistan from 2009 to 2010, as a Lane Safety Operator Supervisor at Fort Riley, Kansas from 2008 to 2009, and as an Intelligence Sergeant and First Sergeant with the 1st Engineer Battalion at Fort Riley from 2008 to 2006. It also provides details of his education and vocational training, as well as a list of awards and qualifications including airborne and air assault badges.
- Amphibious operations require forces to operate across air, land, and sea within the littorals. They transition ready combat forces from sea to shore to achieve advantage over the enemy.
- Characteristics include integration of amphibious task force and landing force, gaining access to operational areas, task organizing based on mission, and unity of effort. Certain operations exploit surprise and apply combat power precisely.
- Command and control structures are established to coordinate forces during planning, movement, and action phases. Transition of control from sea to shore and back is addressed.
- Planning considers decisions on timing, location, and methods to project forces. Embarkation,
This document provides the doctrine for joint amphibious operations conducted by the US Armed Forces. It establishes fundamental principles and guidelines for amphibious operations, including command and control, planning processes, intelligence support, communications support, fire support, and logistics planning. The document is intended to govern joint activities during amphibious operations and provide overarching military guidance for combatant commanders and joint force commanders conducting amphibious operations.
The document is an Operational Groups Field Manual from the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) dated April 25, 1944. It outlines the organization, missions, and operations of Operational Groups (OGs), which were small, specially trained military units organized by OSS to accomplish missions like organizing resistance groups and guerrilla warfare. The manual discusses the organization of OGs in Washington DC and in the field, including personnel recruitment and qualifications, as well as training, operations, and cooperation with other organizations.
The document is an Operational Groups Field Manual from the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) dated April 25, 1944. It outlines the organization, missions, and operations of Operational Groups (OGs), which were small, specially trained military units organized by OSS to accomplish missions like organizing resistance groups and guerrilla warfare. The manual discusses the organization of OGs in Washington DC and in the field, including tables of organization, equipment, and the different command echelons like Field Service Headquarters and Area Headquarters. It also covers personnel recruitment and qualifications.
Presentation - RA 7077 as of 16 February 2021 (1).pptxReiLaBonghanoy1
Republic Act 7077 provides for the development, administration, organization, training, maintenance and utilization of the AFP Reservists. It establishes the Reserve Force to expand the Armed Forces in times of war, invasion, or rebellion. The Reserve Force assists in relief during disasters, socioeconomic development, and maintenance of essential utilities. The act organizes reservists into categories based on age and assigns them to ready, standby, or retired reserve status. It provides for training and equipping reservists to ensure readiness. Reservists may be mobilized during full, partial, or selective mobilization and can perform auxiliary military or civil service.
This document is a resume for Robert R. Burress, who has over 10 years of experience in law enforcement, investigations, and project management through his service in the U.S. Army and Air Force. He has held several leadership roles including as a Company Commander and Chief of Operations, where he oversaw hundreds of personnel and managed multi-million dollar budgets and projects. Burress has received numerous awards and recognition for his outstanding leadership and job performance in both the military and civilian sector. His experience includes areas such as operations management, risk assessment, training, security, and strategic planning.
Solomon Preciado is a veteran of the United States Army with over 15 years of experience, including serving as a Platoon Sergeant supervising 28 soldiers in Afghanistan. He has held several leadership roles such as First Sergeant, Instructor, and Senior Small Group Leader. Preciado has expertise in administration, leadership, operations, planning, and weapons instruction. He is seeking new opportunities and includes references from fellow service members.
This document provides an overview of leveraging civil affairs capabilities. It discusses the near total failure of civilian-military cooperation in Iraq and Afghanistan and identifies opportunities for civil affairs in phase 0 operations. The document proposes an interim solution of a model short of a Goldwater-Nichols Act for improved civil-military cooperation. Ultimately, the document argues for a Goldwater-Nichols Interagency Reform Act to fully leverage civil affairs capabilities across the interagency.
This document provides guidance for conducting joint intelligence preparation of the operational environment (JIPOE). It describes the JIPOE process which analyzes the adversary and other aspects of the operational environment to identify possible adversary courses of action and support joint operation planning, execution, and assessment. The document establishes doctrine for the JIPOE process, defines key terms, and discusses how JIPOE supports each phase of joint operation planning, execution, and assessment. It also addresses JIPOE considerations for multinational and interagency operations across the range of military missions.
This document provides guidance on operation assessment techniques and procedures. It discusses:
1) Standardizing assessment terminology to ensure shared understanding.
2) Describing assessment as commander-centric, informing the commander's decision cycle through organized staff assessment efforts.
3) Presenting an assessment framework for organizing, analyzing, and communicating assessment data to decision makers. The framework includes examples from recent operations.
4) Guidance for planning assessments and integrating them into the operations process to identify emerging opportunities and risks and enable adaptation to accomplish objectives.
This document provides an overview of how the US Army is organized and operates at the headquarters level (HQDA). It begins with the task, purpose and learning objectives of the briefing. It then outlines the agenda which includes discussions of Army history, leadership, organization, communications, politics and specific initiatives like the Energy Task Force. The document provides details on the various commands, directorates and secretariats that make up HQDA. It also explains key HQDA processes like the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process. In summary, the document is intended to familiarize attendees with the structure, functions and operations of the US Army headquarters.
The document proposes a future warrior weapon fighting system concept to increase combat lethality through an integrated systems approach. It involves designing weapons, sights, ammunition, targets, ranges, testing, and training as an interdependent system. Key elements include developing weapons as local area networks, tailoring the force mix to specific missions and terrain, and implementing team-based high-fidelity training and qualification to better prepare soldiers for combat performance under stress conditions. The goal is to increase soldiers' and units' combat lethality while decreasing fratricide and accidental discharges through a total systems design that considers human factors.
The Navy is training personnel on the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell in a tiered approach. Master Mobile Training Teams will provide Tier 2 training to command leadership on the spirit and intent of the repeal. Command leadership will then conduct Tier 1 training with sailors to emphasize Navy policies and expectations. Training will be documented in the Navy Family Accountability and Assessment System to track completion. The current DADT policy remains in effect until final repeal occurs 60 days after certification to Congress that the repeal will not negatively impact standards.
The Role of the Military Component in Child Protection in Armed Conflictrmcpu
The military component in peacekeeping missions is mandated by the UN Security Council to protect civilians, including children. They are expected to prevent, monitor, and report the six grave violations against children as defined by the UN. This involves understanding the operational environment, identifying threats and vulnerabilities, and working with child protection actors to develop plans to deter threats and consolidate protection efforts. The military's role includes pre-deployment training, induction training upon arrival, and ensuring reporting and information sharing with child protection actors. For the military to effectively fulfill its protection mandate, it needs clear mandates, rules of engagement, and sufficient resources and capabilities.
This multi-service publication provides tactics, techniques and procedures for tactical convoy operations. It addresses planning considerations such as troop leading procedures, route selection, convoy organization and communication. It also covers gun truck employment, mounted tactics, and improvised explosive device quick reference information. The document is intended to reduce casualty rates and increase mission success for convoys conducting operations in high threat environments.
This document provides a resume for Cliff A. Overby II. It includes his contact information, objective, professional summary, experience, accomplishments, employment history, education, and coursework. Overby has over 15 years of experience in the Navy, including serving on SEAL Team TWO and the Joint Special Operations Command. He has a Master's degree in Management and Bachelor's in Electrical Engineering Technology.
The document provides joint doctrine for information operations planning, preparation, execution, and assessment to support joint operations and achieve information superiority, establishes the core capabilities of information operations as electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operations security, and provides guidance on intelligence support, command relationships, and planning considerations for information operations.
This document provides guidance on unit administration for the Navy. It discusses key aspects of administration including planning, organization, command and control, and communications. Specifically, it outlines the importance of proper administration in promoting morale, training, and maintenance which are essential for operational readiness. It emphasizes establishing clear lines of responsibility, authority, and accountability within the organizational structure. The document also discusses leadership, motivation, and using various corrective measures and training to ensure standards are met and performance is controlled.
This document provides guidance on unit administration for naval units. It discusses that naval units must be capable of performing a variety of missions effectively in different environments. It emphasizes the importance of personnel correctly interpreting objectives and executing actions to contribute to the attainment of command goals. The document outlines that administration involves planning, organization, command and control, and communications. It provides details on each of these elements of administration and principles for developing an effective organizational structure within a naval unit.
This document summarizes the revised edition of Joint Publication 2-0 on joint intelligence. It reflects updated guidance for conducting joint and multinational intelligence activities across military operations. It establishes joint intelligence doctrine and principles to integrate operations, plans, and intelligence. It provides a common framework to plan and conduct intelligence cooperation with partners. The guidance aims to help current and future leaders address emerging threats by transforming intelligence organizations.
This document discusses current and future integration and interoperability initiatives between the US Marine Corps and US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). It outlines the establishment of the USSOCOM-USMC Board to facilitate over 30 joint initiatives across operations, training, personnel, acquisitions and force contribution. Specific efforts include the integration of Marine Corps detachments with Naval Special Warfare units, increased training opportunities, and the transitioning of some special operations missions to conventional Marine forces.
The document directs the formation of a 2013 Army Focus Area Review Group to develop recommendations for allocating budget reductions across the Army in a way that maintains readiness. It establishes seven focus area teams to review areas like headquarters, force structure, readiness and installations. The teams must propose bold options to meet reduction targets in these areas in order to balance cuts already made in the Army's budget plan. The Review Group will provide comprehensive recommendations by 11 September 2013 to inform decisions about consolidating and reducing organizations, programs and functions.
Major General A. M. Perera has over 34 years of experience in the Sri Lankan military, providing leadership in areas such as contingency management, crisis management, training, and administrative management. He has extensive experience planning and conducting counterterrorism operations and disaster relief operations. He was responsible for formulating the Sri Lankan Army's training doctrine and career planning system. Major General Perera also has experience managing large-scale projects and events.
UN WOD 2024 will take us on a journey of discovery through the ocean's vastness, tapping into the wisdom and expertise of global policy-makers, scientists, managers, thought leaders, and artists to awaken new depths of understanding, compassion, collaboration and commitment for the ocean and all it sustains. The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
The document is an Operational Groups Field Manual from the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) dated April 25, 1944. It outlines the organization, missions, and operations of Operational Groups (OGs), which were small, specially trained military units organized by OSS to accomplish missions like organizing resistance groups and guerrilla warfare. The manual discusses the organization of OGs in Washington DC and in the field, including tables of organization, equipment, and the different command echelons like Field Service Headquarters and Area Headquarters. It also covers personnel recruitment and qualifications.
Presentation - RA 7077 as of 16 February 2021 (1).pptxReiLaBonghanoy1
Republic Act 7077 provides for the development, administration, organization, training, maintenance and utilization of the AFP Reservists. It establishes the Reserve Force to expand the Armed Forces in times of war, invasion, or rebellion. The Reserve Force assists in relief during disasters, socioeconomic development, and maintenance of essential utilities. The act organizes reservists into categories based on age and assigns them to ready, standby, or retired reserve status. It provides for training and equipping reservists to ensure readiness. Reservists may be mobilized during full, partial, or selective mobilization and can perform auxiliary military or civil service.
This document is a resume for Robert R. Burress, who has over 10 years of experience in law enforcement, investigations, and project management through his service in the U.S. Army and Air Force. He has held several leadership roles including as a Company Commander and Chief of Operations, where he oversaw hundreds of personnel and managed multi-million dollar budgets and projects. Burress has received numerous awards and recognition for his outstanding leadership and job performance in both the military and civilian sector. His experience includes areas such as operations management, risk assessment, training, security, and strategic planning.
Solomon Preciado is a veteran of the United States Army with over 15 years of experience, including serving as a Platoon Sergeant supervising 28 soldiers in Afghanistan. He has held several leadership roles such as First Sergeant, Instructor, and Senior Small Group Leader. Preciado has expertise in administration, leadership, operations, planning, and weapons instruction. He is seeking new opportunities and includes references from fellow service members.
This document provides an overview of leveraging civil affairs capabilities. It discusses the near total failure of civilian-military cooperation in Iraq and Afghanistan and identifies opportunities for civil affairs in phase 0 operations. The document proposes an interim solution of a model short of a Goldwater-Nichols Act for improved civil-military cooperation. Ultimately, the document argues for a Goldwater-Nichols Interagency Reform Act to fully leverage civil affairs capabilities across the interagency.
This document provides guidance for conducting joint intelligence preparation of the operational environment (JIPOE). It describes the JIPOE process which analyzes the adversary and other aspects of the operational environment to identify possible adversary courses of action and support joint operation planning, execution, and assessment. The document establishes doctrine for the JIPOE process, defines key terms, and discusses how JIPOE supports each phase of joint operation planning, execution, and assessment. It also addresses JIPOE considerations for multinational and interagency operations across the range of military missions.
This document provides guidance on operation assessment techniques and procedures. It discusses:
1) Standardizing assessment terminology to ensure shared understanding.
2) Describing assessment as commander-centric, informing the commander's decision cycle through organized staff assessment efforts.
3) Presenting an assessment framework for organizing, analyzing, and communicating assessment data to decision makers. The framework includes examples from recent operations.
4) Guidance for planning assessments and integrating them into the operations process to identify emerging opportunities and risks and enable adaptation to accomplish objectives.
This document provides an overview of how the US Army is organized and operates at the headquarters level (HQDA). It begins with the task, purpose and learning objectives of the briefing. It then outlines the agenda which includes discussions of Army history, leadership, organization, communications, politics and specific initiatives like the Energy Task Force. The document provides details on the various commands, directorates and secretariats that make up HQDA. It also explains key HQDA processes like the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process. In summary, the document is intended to familiarize attendees with the structure, functions and operations of the US Army headquarters.
The document proposes a future warrior weapon fighting system concept to increase combat lethality through an integrated systems approach. It involves designing weapons, sights, ammunition, targets, ranges, testing, and training as an interdependent system. Key elements include developing weapons as local area networks, tailoring the force mix to specific missions and terrain, and implementing team-based high-fidelity training and qualification to better prepare soldiers for combat performance under stress conditions. The goal is to increase soldiers' and units' combat lethality while decreasing fratricide and accidental discharges through a total systems design that considers human factors.
The Navy is training personnel on the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell in a tiered approach. Master Mobile Training Teams will provide Tier 2 training to command leadership on the spirit and intent of the repeal. Command leadership will then conduct Tier 1 training with sailors to emphasize Navy policies and expectations. Training will be documented in the Navy Family Accountability and Assessment System to track completion. The current DADT policy remains in effect until final repeal occurs 60 days after certification to Congress that the repeal will not negatively impact standards.
The Role of the Military Component in Child Protection in Armed Conflictrmcpu
The military component in peacekeeping missions is mandated by the UN Security Council to protect civilians, including children. They are expected to prevent, monitor, and report the six grave violations against children as defined by the UN. This involves understanding the operational environment, identifying threats and vulnerabilities, and working with child protection actors to develop plans to deter threats and consolidate protection efforts. The military's role includes pre-deployment training, induction training upon arrival, and ensuring reporting and information sharing with child protection actors. For the military to effectively fulfill its protection mandate, it needs clear mandates, rules of engagement, and sufficient resources and capabilities.
This multi-service publication provides tactics, techniques and procedures for tactical convoy operations. It addresses planning considerations such as troop leading procedures, route selection, convoy organization and communication. It also covers gun truck employment, mounted tactics, and improvised explosive device quick reference information. The document is intended to reduce casualty rates and increase mission success for convoys conducting operations in high threat environments.
This document provides a resume for Cliff A. Overby II. It includes his contact information, objective, professional summary, experience, accomplishments, employment history, education, and coursework. Overby has over 15 years of experience in the Navy, including serving on SEAL Team TWO and the Joint Special Operations Command. He has a Master's degree in Management and Bachelor's in Electrical Engineering Technology.
The document provides joint doctrine for information operations planning, preparation, execution, and assessment to support joint operations and achieve information superiority, establishes the core capabilities of information operations as electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operations security, and provides guidance on intelligence support, command relationships, and planning considerations for information operations.
This document provides guidance on unit administration for the Navy. It discusses key aspects of administration including planning, organization, command and control, and communications. Specifically, it outlines the importance of proper administration in promoting morale, training, and maintenance which are essential for operational readiness. It emphasizes establishing clear lines of responsibility, authority, and accountability within the organizational structure. The document also discusses leadership, motivation, and using various corrective measures and training to ensure standards are met and performance is controlled.
This document provides guidance on unit administration for naval units. It discusses that naval units must be capable of performing a variety of missions effectively in different environments. It emphasizes the importance of personnel correctly interpreting objectives and executing actions to contribute to the attainment of command goals. The document outlines that administration involves planning, organization, command and control, and communications. It provides details on each of these elements of administration and principles for developing an effective organizational structure within a naval unit.
This document summarizes the revised edition of Joint Publication 2-0 on joint intelligence. It reflects updated guidance for conducting joint and multinational intelligence activities across military operations. It establishes joint intelligence doctrine and principles to integrate operations, plans, and intelligence. It provides a common framework to plan and conduct intelligence cooperation with partners. The guidance aims to help current and future leaders address emerging threats by transforming intelligence organizations.
This document discusses current and future integration and interoperability initiatives between the US Marine Corps and US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). It outlines the establishment of the USSOCOM-USMC Board to facilitate over 30 joint initiatives across operations, training, personnel, acquisitions and force contribution. Specific efforts include the integration of Marine Corps detachments with Naval Special Warfare units, increased training opportunities, and the transitioning of some special operations missions to conventional Marine forces.
The document directs the formation of a 2013 Army Focus Area Review Group to develop recommendations for allocating budget reductions across the Army in a way that maintains readiness. It establishes seven focus area teams to review areas like headquarters, force structure, readiness and installations. The teams must propose bold options to meet reduction targets in these areas in order to balance cuts already made in the Army's budget plan. The Review Group will provide comprehensive recommendations by 11 September 2013 to inform decisions about consolidating and reducing organizations, programs and functions.
Major General A. M. Perera has over 34 years of experience in the Sri Lankan military, providing leadership in areas such as contingency management, crisis management, training, and administrative management. He has extensive experience planning and conducting counterterrorism operations and disaster relief operations. He was responsible for formulating the Sri Lankan Army's training doctrine and career planning system. Major General Perera also has experience managing large-scale projects and events.
UN WOD 2024 will take us on a journey of discovery through the ocean's vastness, tapping into the wisdom and expertise of global policy-makers, scientists, managers, thought leaders, and artists to awaken new depths of understanding, compassion, collaboration and commitment for the ocean and all it sustains. The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
Combined Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Vessel List.Christina Parmionova
The best available, up-to-date information on all fishing and related vessels that appear on the illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing vessel lists published by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and related organisations. The aim of the site is to improve the effectiveness of the original IUU lists as a tool for a wide variety of stakeholders to better understand and combat illegal fishing and broader fisheries crime.
To date, the following regional organisations maintain or share lists of vessels that have been found to carry out or support IUU fishing within their own or adjacent convention areas and/or species of competence:
Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)
North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)
North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
The Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List merges all these sources into one list that provides a single reference point to identify whether a vessel is currently IUU listed. Vessels that have been IUU listed in the past and subsequently delisted (for example because of a change in ownership, or because the vessel is no longer in service) are also retained on the site, so that the site contains a full historic record of IUU listed fishing vessels.
Unlike the IUU lists published on individual RFMO websites, which may update vessel details infrequently or not at all, the Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List is kept up to date with the best available information regarding changes to vessel identity, flag state, ownership, location, and operations.
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
2. NSS
NMS
JOINT DOCTRINE
FORCE STRUCTURE, BUDGETS,
PROGRAMS, TECH MANUALS,
OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS
JT PUB 6-0
JT PUB 5-0
JT PUB 4-0
JT PUB 3-0
JT PUB 2-0
JT PUB 1-0
JT PUB 3-07
JT PUB 3-05
JT PUB 3-05.3
JT PUB 3-05.5
JT PUB 3-07.1
JT PUB 3-07.2
JT PUB 3-07.3
JT PUB 3-07.4
FM 100-2-20
DASH-1
DASH-10
HIERARCHY OF
DOCTRINE
TPFDD
CONPLAN
OPLANs
CINC's STRATEGY
CAMPAIGN
PLANs
FMFM 1
NWP 1
FM 100-5
FM 100-20
FM 100-25
AFDD 1
MCM 3-X
AFDD 2-7
AFDD 2-3
MCM 3-X
SERVICE DOCTRINE
JT PUB 1
3.
4. USSOCOM/JOINT DOCTRINE
CHANGES
• USSOCOM MEMO, 9 JUN 95 ELIMINATED SOF
LEXICON IN FAVOR OF STANDARD MILITARY
TERMINOLOGY
• USSOCOM IS CURRENTLY WRITING JP 3-05.1,
JSOTF OPERATIONS AND JP 3-05.3 WILL BE
RESCINDED
• JP 3-05.5 IS BEING REWRITTEN AND
REDESIGNATED JP 3-05.2, "JOINT TACTICS,
TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL
OPERATIONS TARGETING AND MISSION
PLANNING."
5. USSOCOM/JOINT DOCTRINE
CHANGES
• JP 3-57, Joint Doctrine for Civil-Military
Operations, 8 Feb 01
• JP 3-57.1 Joint Doctrine for Civil Affairs is
in second draft.
• JP 3-05, Doctrine for Joint Special
Operations – Program Directive issued.
• JP 0-2 Unified Action Armed Forces
(UNAAF)
6. Unified Action Armed Forces
(UNAAF)
• JP 0-2 designates the authorized command
relationships and authority military commanders can
use.
• Provides policy for the exercise of that military
authority.
• Provides doctrine and principles for command and
control.
• Prescribes policy for organizing joint forces.
• Prescribes policy for selected joint activities.
• Provides military guidance for the exercise of authority
by combatant commanders and other joint force
commanders .
7. Unified Action Armed Forces
(UNAAF)
• Joint Pub 0-2 will be followed except when, in the
judgment of the commander, exceptional
circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise
between the contents of this publication and the
contents of Service publications, this publication
will take precedence for the activities of joint
forces unless the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, normally in coordination with the other
members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has
provided more current and specific guidance.
8. Roles,
Missions, and Functions
• “Roles” are the broad and enduring purposes for
which the Services and the United States Special
Operations Command (USSOCOM) were
established by Congress.
• “Missions” are the tasks assigned by the
President or Secretary of Defense to the
combatant commanders.
• “Functions” are specific responsibilities assigned
by the President and Secretary of Defense to
enable the Services and USSOCOM to fulfill their
legally established roles.
9. USSOCOM Roles
• Training and Ensuring Combat readiness
• Monitoring Personnel Promotions and Assignments
• Developing and Acquiring SOF-Peculiar Equipment
• Manage a Separate Major Force Program (MFP -11)
12. USSOCOM Functions
• Train and provide combat-ready special operations
forces (SOF) to the geographic combatant commanders
and, when directed by the NCA, conduct selected special
operations (SO).
• Develop SO, psychological operations, and civil affairs
strategy, doctrine and tactics, techniques, and
procedures.
13. USSOCOM Functions
• Prepare and submit to the Secretary of Defense
program recommendations and budget proposals for
SOF and for other forces assigned to USSOCOM.
• USCINCSOC exercises COCOM of all active and
reserve SOF, US Army psychological operations, and
civil affairs forces (except for Marine Corps Reserve
Civil Affairs Groups) stationed in the continental
United States.
14.
15. The Combatant Commands
• The President, through the Secretary of Defense,
with the advice and assistance of the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, establishes combatant
commands for the performance of military missions
and prescribes the force structure of such
commands.
16. Commanders of Combatant
Commands
• Exercise combatant command (command
authority) (COCOM) of assigned forces
• Directly responsible to the NCA for the
performance of assigned missions and the
preparedness of their commands.
• Prescribe the chain of command within their
combatant commands and designate the
appropriate command authority to be exercised
by subordinate commanders.
17. The Military Departments
• Operate under the authority, direction, and
control of the Secretary of Defense.
• This branch of the chain of command embraces
all military forces within the respective Service
not specifically assigned to commanders of
combatant commands.
• This branch of the chain of command is separate
and distinct from the branch of the chain of
command that exists within a combatant
command.
18. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff
• Assists the President and Secretary of Defense in
performing their command functions.
• Transmits to the commanders of the combatant
commands the orders given by the NCA and, as
directed by the Secretary of Defense, also oversees the
activities of those commands.
• Reports from combatant commanders normally will be
submitted through the Chairman who forwards them to
the Secretary of Defense and acts as the spokesman
for the commanders of the combatant commands.
19. COMMAND
• Commanders in the chain of command exercise
authority as prescribed by law or a superior
commander, defined as one of the following
command relationships, over the military
capability made available to them.
20. Command Relationships
• Combatant command [command authority]
(COCOM)
• Operational control (OPCON)
• Tactical control (TACON)
• Support
21.
22. OPCON is the Authority to
• Exercise or delegate OPCON and TACON, establish
support relationships among subordinates, and
designate coordinating authorities.
• Give direction to subordinate commands and forces
necessary to carry out missions assigned to the
command, including authoritative direction over all
aspects of military operations and joint training.
• Prescribe the chain of command to the commands
and forces within the command.
• Organize commands and forces within the command
as necessary to carry out missions assigned to the
command.
23. OPCON is the Authority to
• Employ forces within the command, as necessary, to carry
out missions assigned to the command.
• Assign command functions to subordinate commanders.
• Plan for, deploy, direct, control, and coordinate the action
of subordinate forces.
• Establish plans, policies, priorities, and overall
requirements for the intelligence activities of the
command.
• Conduct joint training and joint training exercises required
to achieve effective employment of the forces of the
command, in accordance with joint doctrine established by
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and establish
training policies for joint operations required to
accomplish the mission.
24. OPCON is the Authority to
• Suspend from duty and recommend reassignment of
any officer assigned to the command.
• Assign responsibilities to subordinate commanders
for certain routine operational matters that require
coordination of effort of two or more commanders.
• Establish an adequate system of control for local
defense and delineate such areas operation for
subordinate commanders as deemed desirable.
• Delineate functional responsibilities and geographic
operational areas of subordinate commanders.
25. Tactical Control
• TACON is the command authority over assigned or
attached forces or commands, or military capability
or forces made available for tasking, that is limited to
the detailed and usually local direction and control of
movements or maneuvers necessary to accomplish
assigned missions or tasks. TACON may be
delegated to and exercised by commanders at any
echelon at or below the level of combatant command.
TACON is inherent in OPCON.
26. TACON provides the authority
to:
• Give direction for military operations.
• Control designated forces (e.g., ground forces, aircraft
sorties, missile launches, or satellite payload
management).
27. TACON
• TACON provides sufficient authority for controlling
and directing the application of force or tactical use
of combat support assets. TACON does not provide
organizational authority or authoritative direction for
administrative and logistic support.
• TACON typically is exercised by functional
component commanders over military capability or
forces made available to the functional component for
tasking.
28. SUPPORT
• Support is a command authority. A support
relationship is established by a superior
commander between subordinate commanders
when one organization should aid, protect,
complement, or sustain another force.
29. SUPPORT
• Support may be exercised by commanders at any
echelon at or below the level of combatant command.
• The designation of supporting relationships is important
as it conveys priorities to commanders and staffs who
are planning or executing joint operations.
• The establishing authority (the common superior
commander) is responsible for ensuring that both the
supported and supporting commander understand the
degree of authority the supported commander is
granted.
30. SUPPORT - Establishing
Directive
• An establishing directive normally is issued to specify
the purpose of the support relationship, the effect
desired, and the scope of the action to be taken. It
also should include:
• The forces and other resources allocated to the
supporting effort.
• The time, place, level, and duration of the supporting
effort.
31. SUPPORT - Establishing
Directive
• The relative priority of the supporting effort.
• The authority, if any, of the supporting
commander to modify the supporting effort in the
event of exceptional opportunity or an
emergency.
• The degree of authority granted to the supported
commander over the supporting effort.
32.
33.
34. Other Authorities - ADCON
• Administrative Control is the direction or exercise of
authority over subordinate or other organizations in
respect to administration and support including
organization of Service forces, control of resources
and equipment, personnel management, unit logistics,
individual and unit training, readiness, mobilization,
demobilization, and discipline and other matters not
included in the operational missions of the
subordinate or other organizations. ADCON may be
delegated to and exercised by commanders of Service
forces assigned to a combatant commander at any
echelon at or below the level of Service component
command.
35. Other Authorities -
Coordinating Authority
• Coordinating authority may be exercised by
commanders or individuals at any echelon at or below
the level of combatant command. Coordinating
authority is the authority delegated to a commander or
individual for coordinating specific functions and
activities involving forces of two or more Military
Departments, functional components, or two or more
forces of the same Service. The commander or
individual has the authority to require consultation
between the agencies involved but does not have the
authority to compel agreement.
36. Other Authorities- DIRLAUTH
• Direct Liaison Authorized is that authority granted by a
commander (any level) to a subordinate to directly
consult or coordinate an action with a command or
agency within or outside of the granting command.
DIRLAUTH is more applicable to planning than
operations and always carries with it the requirement
of keeping the commander granting DIRLAUTH
informed. DIRLAUTH is a coordination relationship,
not an authority through which command may be
exercised.
37. Joint Task Forces - JTFs
• Joint forces are established at three levels: unified
commands, subordinate unified commands, and
JTFs.
• Unified Commands are established by the President.
• Subordinate unified commands are established by
commanders of unified commands.
• JTFs can be established by the Secretary of Defense,
a combatant commander, subordinate unified
commander, or an existing JTF commander.
38. Subordinate Unified Command
• Commanders of subordinate unified commands have
functions and responsibilities similar to those of the
commanders of unified commands and exercise
OPCON of assigned commands and forces and
normally over attached forces within the assigned
JOA or functional area.
39. JTF’s
• The authority establishing a JTF designates the
commander and assigns the mission and forces.
• The commander of a JTF exercises OPCON over
assigned and normally over attached forces. The
commander is responsible for making
recommendations to the superior commander on the
proper employment of assigned and attached forces
and for accomplishing such operational missions as
may be assigned by the establishing commander.
• JTF commanders also are responsible to the
establishing commander for the conduct of joint
training of assigned forces.
40. Organizing Joint Forces
• A JFC has the authority to organize forces to best
accomplish the assigned mission based on the
concept of operations .
• JFC will establish subordinate commands, assign
responsibilities, establish or delegate appropriate
command and support relationships, and establish
coordinating instructions for the component
commanders.
• The composition of the JFC’s staff will reflect the
composition of the joint force to ensure those
responsible for employing joint forces have thorough
knowledge of total force capabilities and limitations.
41.
42. Functional Component
Commands
• The JFC can establish functional component
commands to conduct operations. Functional
component commands can be appropriate when forces
from two or more Military Departments must operate in
the same dimension or medium or there is a need to
accomplish a distinct aspect of the assigned mission.
• Joint force land, air, maritime, and special operations
component commanders are examples of functional
components.
• Functional component commands are component
commands of a joint force and do not constitute a
“joint force” with the authorities and responsibilities of
a joint force even when composed of forces from two
43. JFSOCC
• Most often, joint forces are organized with a
combination of Service and functional component
commands with operational responsibilities.
• Joint forces organized with Army, Navy, Air Force,
and Marine Corps components will have special
operations forces (if assigned) organized as a
functional component.
• The JFC defines the authority and responsibilities of
the Service and functional component commanders.
44. JFSOCC
• The JFC must designate the military capability that
will be made available for tasking by the functional
component commander and the appropriate
command relationship(s) the functional component
commander will exercise.
• A joint force special operations component
commander normally has OPCON of assigned forces.
• A JFACC normally is delegated TACON of the sorties
or other military capability made available.
45. NOTIONAL JOINT TASK FORCE ORGANIZATION
THEATER COMPONENT COMMANDS
ARMY
COMMANDER
AIR FORCE
COMMANDER
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES
COMMANDER
MARINE
COMMANDER
NAVY
COMMANDER
COMMANDER
JOINT TASK FORCE
COMMANDER IN CHIEF
JOINT FORCE
LAND
COMPONENT
COMMANDER
(JFLCC)
JOINT FORCE
MARITIME
COMPONENT
COMMANDER
(JFMCC)
JOINT FORCE
AIR
COMPONENT
COMMANDER
(JFACC)
JOINT FORCE
SPECIAL
OPERATIONS
COMPONENT
COMMANDER
(JFSOCC)
JOINT
CIVIL-MILITARY
OPERATIONS TASK
FORCE (JCMOTF)
JOINT
PSYCHOLOGICAL
OPERATIONS TASK
FORCE (JPOTF)
NSWTU
SOLE
CORPS/MEF
SOCCE
NAVSOF AFSOF ARSOF
NSWTG AFSOC ARSOTF JSOACC
ARSOA
NAVSOA
AFSOA
ADMIN/LOGISTICS
OPERATIONAL CONTROL
LIAISON
JSOTF
46. JSOTF DEFINITION
• A temporary joint SOF headquarters established
to control SOF of more than one Service in a
specific theater of operations or to accomplish a
specific mission. It supports the theater
campaign or other operations as directed.
Normally formed from the nucleus of the theater
SOC or an existing SOF component.
47. JSOAC DEFINITION
• Responsible for planning and executing joint
special air operations and for coordinating and
deconflicting these operations with conventional
air activities. The JSOACC will be the
commander with the preponderance of assets
and greatest ability to plan, coordinate, allocate,
task, control, and support the assigned joint
special operations aviation (SOA) assets.
48. SOLE DEFINITION
• A joint organization of SOF expertise, including SOF
aircrews, intelligence, airspace, logistics, Special
Tactics Team (Combat Control and Pararescue),
Army SF, and Navy Seals working with the JFACC
staff to ensure all SOF targets, teams, and air
missions are deconflicted and properly integrated
and coordinated at all planning and execution
phases aimed at the prevention of fratricide while
accomplishing assigned missions.
49. COMMAND PHILOSOPHY
• SIMPLICITY - FLEXIBILITY - REALISM
• EMPOWER JUNIOR LEADERS
• CENTRALIZED CONTROL WITH
DECENTRALIZED EXECUTION
50. THE CHALLENGE
• SOF MISSION CRITERIA
• APPROPRIATE MISSION?
• SUPPORT JFC’s CAMPAIGN PLAN?
• OPERATIONALLY FEASIBLE?
• RESOURCES AVAILABLE?
• EXPECTED OUTCOME JUSTIFY RISK?
51. INTERNET DOCTRINE SITES
• Joint Electronic Library
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/index.html
• Army Doctrine
http://www.adtdl.army.mil/atdls.htm
• Air Force Doctrine
• http://www.doctrine.af.mil
• Navy Electronic Directives System
http://neds.nebt.daps.mil
• USMC Doctrine Division
http://www.doctrine.quantico.usmc.mil/index.html
• Air Land Sea Application Center
http://www.dtic.mil/alsa