A renowned speaker on the subject of FRS 102, which replaces all existing accounting rules for private Irish companies from 1 January 2015. This new standard is attracting a lot of attention as these standards become applicable and John is already consulting and lecturing widely, helping firms and businesses implement the changes.
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
John McCarthy - FRS 102
1.
THE NEW IRISH GAAP
John McCarthy, FCA
John McCarthy Consulting Limited
December 2015
www.jmcc.ie
2. Things were a lot simpler in 1515
http://jmcc.ie/d7/content/things-were-lot-simpler-1515
Recent ‘Practice Makes Perfect’ blog post
Bad debt provisions now more complicated to justify
Hierarchy of impairment in 11.22 and 11.23
Revenue Commissioners interested
5 year spreading – Section 42 FA 2014
3. THE NEW IRISH GAAP
AGENDA
1. What is New Irish GAAP?
2. FRS 105
3. What is Transition?
4. Traps for the unwary
5. Inter-company loans
5. FRS 102 –The StandardThat Keeps on
Giving!!
www.frc.org.uk
Three versions to date March 2013/August
2014/September 2015 – read this
16 Staff Education Notes (SENs)
Applies to all private entities – not just companies
6. THE NEW IRISH GAAP – Private Entities
effective for a/c periods starting 1/1/2015
Essentially Two Standards from 2016 on
1. FRS 102 – ‘The Financial Reporting Standard Applicable in
the UK and Republic of Ireland’ (Sept 2015)
2. FRS 105 – ‘The Financial Reporting Standard applicable to
the Micro-entities Regime’ (July 2015)
FRS 105 valid in the UK from 1/1/2016. Early application permitted.
Not yet legal in the Republic of Ireland
FRSSE – ‘Financial Reporting Standard for Smaller Entities’ is gone from
31 December 2015
7. Options right now – Option 1 – FRSSE
1. Switch to FRSSE 2015 for one last year – for accounts periods beginning
on/after 1 January 2015 (‘small’ entities only) – not for regulated entities
Means you get to keep:
The ‘old’ familiar GAAP rules for one last year
Delay to FRS 102 to 31/12/2016 period ends
Delay familiarisation with new software – potential downside!
Postpone a lot of headaches until early 2017
Comparatives for 2015 need changing when you switch over the December
2016 period ends to FRS 102
Witness the ‘carnage’ of the FRS 102 adopters!!!
8. Option 2 – FRS 102
2. Move to FRS 102 with effect from its implementation date i.e. 1 January
2015 – you have to adopt this for ‘medium’ and larger entities anyway
Bite the bullet!
Section 1A inserted for certain ‘small’ entities
Means that you also need to learn a lot of new rules/terminology right now
and convert your 2014 comparatives in the 2015 financial statements
Make a clean break with old GAAP
Who knows what other issues lie ahead in 2017?
9. Option 3 – FRS 105
3. Move to FRS 105 with effect from its implementation date possibly
1 January 2016 – early adoption may be allowed from 1 January 2015
For micro entities only – charities excluded
Must meet two out of three criteria for two consecutive years:
Turnover < €700k
Balance sheet gross assets < €350k
Less than 10 employees
10. FRS 105 – UK version
Shareholders’ accounts
Two formats for balance sheet
One format for the profit and loss account
Directors’ report
No notes, except if bank loans/advances – disclose terms
Fair value accounting not permitted
We await the implementation of the Accounting Directive
11. ‘True and fair’ and micro entity
accounts?
Paragraph 16 of FRS 105
13. FRS 102 – ‘The Financial Reporting Standard
Applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland’
All non-listed entities (‘small’ entities may use Section 1A)
Latest version published Sept. 2015 www.frc.org.uk
Consists of 35 sections – 376 pages (read a section a day)
We refer to this as a single standard rather than to several
FRSs/SSAPs
Statement of compliance is mandatory in all financial
statements – potential issue on monitoring visits in 2017!
15. ‘Transition date’
“Transition date” – really important concept
Say ‘31 December 2014’ is period end
First full financial year under FRS 102 = 31/12/2015
‘Transition date’ = first day of the comparative period
Therefore the ‘Transition date’ = 1 Jan 2014
2014 requires two sets of accounts
Say September period end i.e. Transition date is………
16. Two sets of accounts for 2014?
2014 accounts filed with CRO/Revenue as normal
Prepare 2015 accounts under FRS 102 + file by
September/October 2016 under new rules
Will need comparatives for 2014 under new rules
Transition will cause changes to previously declared
reserves as at 1/1/2014 and 31/12/2014
These need re-stated as if FRS 102 always existed
Transition effects disclosed in the 2015 accounts
17. On first time adoption of FRS must not change the accounting followed
previously for any of the following transactions:
1. derecognition of financial assets and liabilities
2. estimates;(cannot change at date of transition – can’t ‘bury’ errors in the past)
3. discontinued operations; and
4. measuring non controlling interests
Basically cannot use transition as a ‘cover’ to bury/hide any past issues
Four prohibitions – Section 35.9
18. May use one or more of the following exemptions in preparing its first
statements under the FRS: (VIPs in red)
a) Business combinations and goodwill – may elect not to adopt Section 19 for past
combinations but if do restate any previous combination must restate all later
combinations (no need to break up goodwill for past acquisitions)
b) Share based payment transactions – encouraged but not required to apply
Section 26 before date of transition (not widely needed)
c) Fair value as deemed cost – may use previous revaluation under previous
GAAP as deemed cost under the FRS (asset could be 3-4 yrs. old – keep
revaluation reserve intact)
d) Revaluation as deemed cost – may use previous revaluation as deemed cost at
date of transition (i.e. must get revaluations done as at 1-1-2014)
e) Not used
20 exemptions allowed – Section 35.10
19. f) Separate financial statements – must measure investments in subsidiaries,
associates and jointly controlled entities at cost or deemed cost
g) Compound financial instruments – need not separate two components into
debt/equity if debt component is not outstanding at date of transition
(same as FRS 25 for convertible loans)
h) Not used (moved to deferred tax section – must provide deferred tax on all future
revaluations))
i) Service concession arrangements – not required to apply Section 34 to
contracts pre date of transition (same as IFRIC 12 – PPI contracts e.g. some toll
roads i.e. if physical asset on balance sheet, leave it there)
20 exemptions allowed (f) to (i)
20. j) Extractive industries – may elect previous GAAP measure of oil
and gas assets but test for impairment under Section 27
k) Arrangements containing a lease – may elect to use date at
transition rather than original date
l) Decommissioning liabilities included in PP&E – may elect to
measure costs of dismantling component at date of transition
rather than date of original obligation (like FRS 12)
20 exemptions allowed (j) to (l)
21. (m) Dormant companies – Section 365 CA 2014
(n) Deferred development costs as a deemed cost - first-time adopter may
elect to measure the carrying amount at the date of transition to this FRS for
development costs deferred in accordance with SSAP 13
(o) Borrowing costs – may elect to treat the date of transition to this FRS as
the date on which capitalisation commences – not widely adopted
(p) Lease incentives - allowed continue to recognise any residual benefit or
cost associated with these lease incentives on the same basis as that applied
at the date of transition to this FRS
(q) Public benefit entity combinations – not widely adopted
20 exemptions allowed (m) to (q)
22. (r) Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, associates and joint
ventures – where a subsidiary becomes a first-time adopter later
than its parent
(s) Designation of previously recognised financial instruments –
permits a financial instrument (provided it meets certain criteria)
to be designated on initial recognition as a financial asset or
financial liability at fair value through profit or loss
(t) Hedge accounting (added from 1 August 2014) – allows at
least an extra 33 months to document your hedging relationships
from 1-1-2014 to 30-9-2016
20 exemptions allowed (r ) to (t)
23. (u) Small entities – fair value measurement of financial instruments (Sept
2015) - Extract
‘shall apply its existing accounting policies to the relevant financial
instruments in the comparative information and is encouraged to
disclose this fact;
shall disclose the accounting policies applied (in accordance with
paragraph 1AC.3); and
shall treat any adjustment between the statement of financial position
at the comparative period’s reporting date and the statement of
financial position at the start of the first reporting period that complies
with Sections 11 and 12 as an adjustment, in the current reporting
period, to opening equity.’
20 exemptions allowed (u)
24. (v) Small entities – financing transactions involving related
parties
A small entity that first adopts this FRS for an accounting
period that commences before 1 January 2017 need not
restate comparative information to comply with the
requirements of paragraph 11.13 only insofar as they related
to financing transactions involving related parties.
A small entity that chooses to present comparative
information that does not comply with the financing
transaction requirements of Section 11 in its first year of
adoption:
20 exemptions allowed (v)
25. shall apply its existing accounting policies to the relevant financial
instruments in the comparative information and is encouraged to
disclose this fact;
shall disclose the accounting policies applied (in accordance with
paragraph 1AC.3); and
shall treat any adjustment between the statement of financial position
at the comparative period’s reporting date and the statement of
financial position at the start of the first reporting period that complies
with paragraph 11.13 as an adjustment, in the current reporting period,
to opening equity. The present value of the financial asset or financial
liability at the start of the first reporting period that complies with this
FRS may be determined on the basis of the facts and circumstances
existing at that date, rather than when the arrangement was entered
20 exemptions allowed (v)
28. Companies Act 2014 - some changes
CA 2014 applicable to financial statements signed on/after 1
June 2015
Section 330 regarding ‘statement on relevant audit
information’ not applicable until a/c periods commencing
on/after 1 June 2015
5 Technical Releases issued by the CAI on 5 June 2015
Traps for the unwary – differences in layout from before
No longer any need for directors to sign the P&L Account
29. Companies Act 2014 – some changes
Section 305 – disclosure of directors’ remuneration in
abridged accounts
Disclosure of full list of directors’ names – Section 326
No longer ‘proper books of account’
It is now ‘adequate accounting records’ - Section 281
No longer ‘Registered Auditor’ – replaced in Section 336
The new phrase is ‘Statutory Auditor’ or Statutory Audit Firm’
30. Traps and pitfalls – Section 19.23
Maximum useful life of goodwill – still 5 years in CA 2014 but FRS
102, September 2015 version says 10 years – not yet legitimate in
Irish law!!
‘After initial recognition, the acquirer shall measure goodwill
acquired in a business combination at cost less accumulated
amortisation and accumulated impairment losses:
An entity shall follow the principles in paragraphs 18.19 to 18.24 for
amortisation of goodwill. Goodwill shall be considered to have a finite
useful life, and shall be amortised on a systematic basis over its life. If,
in exceptional cases, an entity is unable to make a reliable estimate of
the useful life of goodwill, the life shall not exceed 10 years.
An entity shall follow Section 27 Impairment of Assets for recognising
and measuring the impairment of goodwill.’
31. Traps and pitfalls – Section 19.25
Goodwill Disclosures
Was (August 2014)
‘the useful life of goodwill, and if this exceeds five years,
supporting reasons for this; and…’
Now (September 2015)
‘the useful life of goodwill, and if this cannot be reliably
estimated, supporting reasons for the period chosen; and…’
32. Business combinations and Goodwill – may elect not to adopt Section
19 for past combinations but if do restate any previous combination
must restate all later combinations (no need to break up goodwill for
past acquisitions)
No need to restate previous mergers/acquisitions
Avoid breaking out separate intangibles, licences, franchises, valuing
them at FV assessing their separate useful lives
Also – no need to ‘collapse’ goodwill/intangibles lives from 20 years to
5 (now 10???) years just yet – i.e. can postpone the ‘collapse’ to
31/12/2014 instead of 1/12/2014 i.e. earn another year’s profits to
absorb the hit
Potentially retain the remaining 20 year useful life – see Travelodge
Exemption – from Section 19
33. Revaluation as deemed cost – may use previous revaluation as deemed
cost at date of transition (i.e. get revaluations done as at 1-1-2014)
Can treat a past revaluation (prior to 1/1/2014) as ‘deemed cost’
Once off opportunity to do a revaluation of:
PPE
Investment property
Intangible asset which meets recognition criteria and criteria for
revaluation in section 18
Watch out for deferred tax provision on revaluation – no exemption
See what Travelodge UK did for YE 31/12/2012
Exemption – revaluation as deemed cost
34. Things to do
1. Identify the 4 prohibited restatements (i.e. retrospective
application) such as accounting estimates (para 35.9)
2. Select one or more of 20 exemptions available
3. Consider timing of acquisitions before/after transition
4. Identify forward contracts, caps and collars and interest
rate swaps i.e. financial instruments – Sections 11/12
5. ‘Profit’ related remuneration – profit different?
6. Tax implications – tax will usually follow GAAP
35. Things to do
7. Dividend planning – dividends may be different?
8. Controls may need redesigned
9. Investors/lenders may need re-educated
10. Accounting policies may need updated
11. Obtain fair values as at 31 December 2013 – ask bank
12. Examine banking covenants + renegotiate if needed
13. Systems and procedures – are they set up to capture
items that need fair values?
36. Things to do
14. Make holiday year the same as your financial year and
allow no carry forward of unused holidays
15. Prepare and present reconciliations and disclosures
16. Employees may need training
17. Change accounting date to 30 December 2015 to
postpone transition by 12 months
18. Change careers!!!
37. THE NEW IRISH GAAP
Inter-company’ and
Directors’ Loans
38. Financial instruments
Section 11 – ‘Basic Financial Instruments’
Section 12 - ‘Other Financial Instrument Issues’
Trade debtors/creditors, simple bank loans/investments
Directors’ loans/inter-company loans
Generally measured at amortised cost (like FRS 4)
Investments in ordinary shares that are not puttable –
FVTPL or cost
39. Example of inter-company loan
Interest Free Loan On Five-Year Fixed Term
A subsidiary company adopts FRS 102 for its December
2015 accounts and has a 1 January 2014 ‘transition date’
At 1/1 2012 it took out a €1m interest free loan from a
Director, with a 5yr. fixed term
Assuming it can determine that a market rate of interest
at the time would have been 12%, it goes back to the
inception date to establish what the accounting would
have been from the outset
40. Example of inter-company loan
Year Opening Value Interest at 12% Closing Value
2012 567,427 68,091 635,518
2013 635,518 76,262 711,780
2014 711,780 85,414 797,194
2015 797,194 95,663 892,857
2016 892,857 107,143 1,000,000
• The 2013 closing value of €711,780 is used as the carrying value in the
transition date balance sheet, and the accounting continues from there
• FRS 102 is silent about where the difference of €288,220 goes!!
• PwC ‘Manual of Accounting’ suggests it is a ‘capital contribution’ shown in
reserves. Obviously needs adjustment each year as maturity approaches
• See the new Exemption (v) in Section 35.10 FRS 102
41. One way to avoid this issue
Prepare documentation that states the loans are
‘repayable on demand’
Loans then treated at face value as that is their ‘fair
value’
Means that the net current assets/liabilities of the
company are not as healthy as you would wish
FRS 102 is very document driven
Health warning – this ‘solution’ has not been tested yet!
42. Another way to avoid this issue
Prepare documentation that states the loans are long
term, at a market interest rate but the lender forgives
the interest
Loans then treated at face value as that is their ‘fair
value’
Means that the loan stays as a long term liability
Documentation will be key
Health warning – this ‘solution’ has not been tested yet!
43. Summary – Initial Yr. 1 Accounting
Scenario Parent A/c Sub A/c
1. Parent to sub Dr. Loan receivable
Dr. Investment in
Sub
Cr. Cash at bank
Dr. cash in bank
Cr. loan repayable
Cr. capital
contribution –
equity
2. Sub to parent Dr. Cash at bank
Cr. Loan payable
Cr. P&L – income
from sub.
Dr. Loan receivable
DR. Distribution –
equity
Cr. Cash at bank
44. Summary – InitialYr. 1 Accounting
Scenario Borrower Lender
3. Sub to sub DR cash at bank
Cr. Loan repayable
Cr. Capital
contribution -
equity
Dr. loan receivable
Dr. distribution –
equity
Cr. Cash at bank
46. Audit whole firm/hot file and cold file reviews
Preparation for Regulatory Body monitoring visit
Anti-Money Laundering compliance and training
FRS 102 Accounting/audit technical advice
Insolvency compliance reviews
Investment Business compliance reviews
Practice management and profitability improvement
Services
47. CONTACT DETAILS:
John McCarthy
Mobile 086 839 8360
E mail john@jmcc.ie
Web www.jmcc.ie
Register for our blogs online
THE NEW IRISH GAAP