The document discusses population change in New York City and its boroughs between 2000 and 2010 based on US Census data. Some key points:
- New York City's population grew by 2.1% during this period, with growth concentrated in Brooklyn, Queens and upper Manhattan. The Bronx and Manhattan south of 96th street experienced population losses.
- The foreign-born population increased, with the largest groups coming from the Dominican Republic, China, Jamaica, Guyana, India, Ecuador, and Mexico.
- The Hispanic and Asian populations increased significantly citywide, while the black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic populations declined slightly.
- Within boroughs, neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens
The Changing Demographics of Texas and Their Impact on our Nonprofit SectorGreenlights
The document discusses how the changing demographics of Texas are impacting the nonprofit sector. It notes that from 2000 to 2010, Texas' population grew by over 20%, adding over 4 million new residents, with much of the growth coming from domestic and international migration. The state's Hispanic population grew significantly during this period, making up over 38% of the total population by 2010. Younger Hispanics and Asians now represent larger shares of the state's population. These demographic shifts are affecting nonprofit organizations across the state as they work to serve changing community needs.
The document discusses China's rapid economic growth over the past two decades and the opportunities this presents for the Australian tourism industry. China has experienced high GDP growth compared to traditional markets like Europe. This growth has led to rapid urbanization and the rise of a large middle class in China with increasing disposable income and interest in overseas travel. Many Chinese travelers currently reside in tier 1 cities, but other cities are also experiencing growth, representing great potential for future Chinese tourism to Australia.
Staten Island's changing immigrant profileWagner College
Many people think of Staten Island, one of the five boroughs of New York City, as being mostly white and mostly native-born — but the fact is that, in 2010, more than 20% of the population of Staten Island was foreign-born. That was just one of the surprising details presented on Tuesday, April 23, 2013 by Joseph Salvo, director of the Population Division for NYC Planning, when he addressed Wagner College’s Hugh L. Carey Institute for Government Reform on the topic of “Staten Island and the Changing Immigrant Profile of New York City.” Both the video (60 min.) and slideshow are displayed on the Wagner College website — http://wagner.edu/newsroom/staten-islands-changing-immigrant-profile/
Yearly benchmark presentation to track growth of New Braunfels and Comal County. Includes statistics like sales tax growth, per capita growth, population, building permits and real property valuations. For more information, contact at info@buildnb.org
The document summarizes trends in Boston's population from 1950 to 2010 based on US Census data:
1) Boston's population peaked in 1950 and declined until recent decades, when it began growing again. The 2010 Census marked the first time since 1970 that Boston's population exceeded 600,000.
2) Between 2000 and 2010, Boston's 4.8% population growth compared favorably to other Northeastern cities like New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore.
3) Boston has a relatively young population, high proportion of foreign-born residents, and highly educated adult population, with over 40% holding at least a bachelor's degree.
The document provides an overview of Boston's demographics and economy. It discusses trends in Boston's total population, housing units, age, race, ethnicity, and educational attainment of residents. It also examines economic trends such as employment history, unemployment rates, employment by industry, and educational requirements by industry. Key points include that Boston's population is growing and highly educated, with over 40% of residents having a bachelor's degree or higher. Boston is also becoming more racially and ethnically diverse, with just under half of residents now identifying as non-white.
The Changing Demographics of Texas and Their Impact on our Nonprofit SectorGreenlights
The document discusses how the changing demographics of Texas are impacting the nonprofit sector. It notes that from 2000 to 2010, Texas' population grew by over 20%, adding over 4 million new residents, with much of the growth coming from domestic and international migration. The state's Hispanic population grew significantly during this period, making up over 38% of the total population by 2010. Younger Hispanics and Asians now represent larger shares of the state's population. These demographic shifts are affecting nonprofit organizations across the state as they work to serve changing community needs.
The document discusses China's rapid economic growth over the past two decades and the opportunities this presents for the Australian tourism industry. China has experienced high GDP growth compared to traditional markets like Europe. This growth has led to rapid urbanization and the rise of a large middle class in China with increasing disposable income and interest in overseas travel. Many Chinese travelers currently reside in tier 1 cities, but other cities are also experiencing growth, representing great potential for future Chinese tourism to Australia.
Staten Island's changing immigrant profileWagner College
Many people think of Staten Island, one of the five boroughs of New York City, as being mostly white and mostly native-born — but the fact is that, in 2010, more than 20% of the population of Staten Island was foreign-born. That was just one of the surprising details presented on Tuesday, April 23, 2013 by Joseph Salvo, director of the Population Division for NYC Planning, when he addressed Wagner College’s Hugh L. Carey Institute for Government Reform on the topic of “Staten Island and the Changing Immigrant Profile of New York City.” Both the video (60 min.) and slideshow are displayed on the Wagner College website — http://wagner.edu/newsroom/staten-islands-changing-immigrant-profile/
Yearly benchmark presentation to track growth of New Braunfels and Comal County. Includes statistics like sales tax growth, per capita growth, population, building permits and real property valuations. For more information, contact at info@buildnb.org
The document summarizes trends in Boston's population from 1950 to 2010 based on US Census data:
1) Boston's population peaked in 1950 and declined until recent decades, when it began growing again. The 2010 Census marked the first time since 1970 that Boston's population exceeded 600,000.
2) Between 2000 and 2010, Boston's 4.8% population growth compared favorably to other Northeastern cities like New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore.
3) Boston has a relatively young population, high proportion of foreign-born residents, and highly educated adult population, with over 40% holding at least a bachelor's degree.
The document provides an overview of Boston's demographics and economy. It discusses trends in Boston's total population, housing units, age, race, ethnicity, and educational attainment of residents. It also examines economic trends such as employment history, unemployment rates, employment by industry, and educational requirements by industry. Key points include that Boston's population is growing and highly educated, with over 40% of residents having a bachelor's degree or higher. Boston is also becoming more racially and ethnically diverse, with just under half of residents now identifying as non-white.
The document provides an overview of population, economic, and employment trends in the Austin metropolitan statistical area (MSA). Some key points:
- The Austin MSA population grew 41.4% between 1999-2009, among the fastest growing of major US metro areas.
- The region is projected to add over 112,000 new jobs in the next 5 years and see continued strong economic and population growth.
- Major employers in the Austin area include Dell, IBM, Seton Healthcare, St. David's Healthcare, Apple, National Instruments, and Whole Foods Market. The area has attracted many new and expanded operations from companies like Oracle, Samsung, and PayPal.
The document summarizes demographic trends in New York City, focusing on population changes driven by domestic out-migration offset by international immigration and natural increase. While New York City lost around 800,000 domestic migrants between 2000-2006, it gained over 600,000 immigrants. As a result, the city was able to continue growing its population despite net domestic out-migration. Immigrants have become an increasingly important source of population growth for New York, comprising around one-third of the city's total population in 2006. The immigrant population helps fuel secondary population growth through higher birth rates among immigrant communities.
This document summarizes 2010 Census data for the 9 wards of Evanston, Illinois. It shows population changes from 2000 to 2010, with some wards increasing and others decreasing in population. While the city's total population rose by 0.33%, redistricting of ward boundaries is not mandatory but could be done discretionally. The document outlines principles and timeframes for potential redistricting, and notes GIS tools are available to analyze ward demographics and mapping.
The document provides an overview of the commercial real estate market and rental housing market outlook for 2011. It summarizes employment trends in 2010 which showed growth in many sectors. It also discusses capital market conditions, property fundamentals like rents and vacancies for apartments, offices, and retail properties from 2000-2011. Overall vacancy rates are expected to decline while rents are forecasted to rise across major property types in 2011.
The document summarizes population and economic trends in the 11-county Atlanta region from 2022. It finds that the region grew by over 64,000 people between 2021 and 2022 to a total population of over 5 million. Gwinnett County saw the largest numeric increase while Henry County had the highest percentage growth. The City of Atlanta rebounded from slower growth in 2020-2021. Housing demand remains high across the region although building permit activity has not returned to pre-Great Recession levels. Job growth in the Atlanta region was strong in 2022, outpacing national trends. Most new housing construction is occurring in the outer suburban and exurban counties.
This document provides demographic data and trends for Howard County, Maryland. It discusses population growth which has averaged around 2,000 new residential units per year. The population is aging with growth among those 65 and older outpacing other groups. Employment has grown by around 25,000 jobs since 2000 and is projected to increase by 70,000 more by 2020. Future development is planned through allocation of housing units across planning regions in the county.
Economic Growth in Central Texas: The Promise and Reality of Prosperity in ou...Civic Analytics LLC
The document discusses economic growth in Austin, Texas. It finds that Austin has experienced rapid population growth in recent decades, ranking 11th nationally since 2000, primarily due to domestic migration from other parts of Texas and other states. This growth has been fueled by a strong tech sector and job market. However, concerns are raised that not all residents have benefited equally from the economic expansion, and that infrastructure and housing affordability challenges threaten future sustainability unless addressed. The discussion section focuses on improving education levels and workforce training to ensure inclusive economic participation.
This month's Regional Snapshot explores ARC’s annual population estimates for 2014 to assess how we are recovering from the slowdown we experienced during the Great Recession.
Population Estimates, Methods, Procedures & Local GovtRobert Hiett
This document discusses population estimates and projections for North Carolina municipalities and counties. It provides population data from 1970 to present and projections out to 2038. It summarizes population change from 2010 to 2018 for North Carolina and other states. It also discusses the roles and responsibilities of the US Census Bureau and North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management in producing population estimates used for planning and distributing state and federal funds. Accurate 2020 Census counts are important for producing reliable population estimates.
Austin is experiencing rapid population growth, averaging 49% each decade since the 1960s. This growth is fueled mainly by domestic migration, as 61% of new households moving to Austin come from other parts of Texas. Key factors attracting newcomers include a strong economy with 13.9% job growth since 2009, second only to Nashville. While housing costs in Austin remain competitive for now, affordability is declining with median home prices rising 65% in the last decade. High-paying jobs in technology, engineering, healthcare and education are contributing to Austin's status as an attractive place to live and work.
7.2 square miles. That is Greater Downtown Detroit. A slice of Detroit’s 139-square mile geography. A 7.2 square mile collection of neighborhoods: Downtown, Midtown, New Center, Woodbridge, Eastern Market, Lafayette Park, Rivertown, and Corktown—and so much more.
Like city-centers globally, downtowns are owned by everyone—welcoming residents, employees, visitors, and tourists. Greater Downtown contains high-rise and low-rise living, our richest cultural assets, the center of Detroit’s business world, the region’s sports and entertainment hub, some of the city’s most storied neighborhoods, and some of Southeast Michigan’s leading educational and medical institutions.
7.2 SQ MI is the data story of a physically and economically changing place. It is a snapshot that captures current information on residing, working, employing, visiting, living, playing, and investing in Greater Downtown. While a celebration of progress, it also acknowledges continued challenges and reveals potential opportunity.
We believe after reading 7.2 SQ MI you will see the momentum of today in Greater Downtown Detroit and the promise of tomorrow.
The Hudson-Webber Foundation
Detroit, Michigan, February 2013
$417
Boston $385 Back Bay $706
New York $375 Tribeca $1,450
Denver $225 Cherry Creek $525
Austin $185 Tarrytown $325
Dallas $150 Preston Hollow $300
Houston $135 Tanglewood $325
Phoenix $135 Paradise Valley $325
January 30, 2013 | CCIM Symposium: Growing Pains of Austin
This document summarizes key population and housing data from the 2010 Census for Massachusetts and the Metropolitan Area Planning Council region. Some of the key findings include:
- The population grew 3.1% in Massachusetts and the MAPC region between 2000-2010. Developing suburbs saw the largest growth at 5.8%.
- Several cities like Lawrence, Chelsea, and Springfield became "majority-minority" communities, where racial/ethnic minorities make up over 50% of the population.
- The population is growing more racially diverse, with minorities making up a larger share of those under 18 compared to those over 18.
- Housing units increased 7% in Massachusetts and the MAPC region
Webster City, Iowa is located at the crossroads of Interstate 35 and Highway 20. It has a skilled workforce and low costs of doing business that have attracted many world-class companies. The city expects to continue attracting businesses due to its business-friendly climate with available sites, utilities, and financial incentives. It has a population of around 8,000 people and a median household income of $45,544.
The document summarizes population trends in Boston from 1950 to 2010 based on US Census Bureau data. It finds that Boston's population peaked in 1950 and declined afterwards but has grown since 2000. The 2010 Census marked the first time since 1970 that Boston's population exceeded 600,000. Boston's population growth between 2000-2010 compares favorably to other northeastern cities and its rate was higher than New York City and San Francisco. Boston also has a young population and is becoming more racially and ethnically diverse with time.
Robert Knakal is the chairman and founding partner of Massey Knakal Realty Services, a commercial real estate brokerage firm. This document provides an overview and analysis of the New York City multi-family residential sales market from 2005 to 2011 based on data from Massey Knakal. It includes statistics on total sales volume, number of properties sold, average sale price per property, and capitalization rates for walk-up and elevator buildings across the five boroughs over this period.
Over the last 20 years in Boston, there has been:
- 80 million square feet of new development added, including 21,618 housing units and 7,140 hotel rooms.
- 9.4 million square feet of new office space, accounting for 11% of Boston's total square footage.
- $8.8 billion worth of projects currently under construction or breaking ground in 2013, totaling 23.1 million square feet, 11,372 residential units, and across 63 projects.
Home sales in British Columbia were relatively unchanged in June 2021 compared to the same month the previous year. The average home price rose 14.4% to $571,837 in June 2021 compared to June 2020. While sales were steady, low interest rates and expected growth in employment are factors that may increase consumer incentive for home purchases over the summer. Year-to-date, home sales dollar volume increased 15.5% compared to the same period in 2020.
Population estimates for the major jurisdictions in the 10-county Atlanta region is one of ARC's signature products. This presents ARC's 2013 population estimates which show the region added 40,100 new residents over the past year.
The Phoenix housing market summary document discusses 1) strengths of the Phoenix market including population and income growth, educated workforce, and lack of natural disasters, 2) concerns around high home inventories and foreclosures, and tight credit, and 3) a forecast that predicts continued population growth but a slowing housing market in 2009 due to economic challenges.
1. In the Faroe Islands, the Norse developed a sustainable agricultural system utilizing wild resources and established clustered settlements, allowing them to successfully adapt to climate changes over centuries.
2. In Iceland, the Norse also initially implemented environmental management and regulation, but soil erosion increased after woodlands were cleared and sheep numbers rose, degrading the landscape.
3. In Greenland, the Norse settlement focused on marine resources and became rigidly dependent on them, unable to adapt when climate change made travel more difficult and economic and cultural changes occurred in the 15th century, leading to the abandonment of the settlements.
1. The Norse settlements in the Faroe Islands, Iceland, and Greenland faced different challenges from climate change and made different choices, leading to different outcomes.
2. In the Faroe Islands, sustainable practices, utilization of wild resources, limited landscape impacts, and successful adaptation to climate change led to long-term settlement success.
3. In Iceland, early environmental management and regulation allowed sustainable exploitation but significant landscape degradation occurred when faced with unpredictable climate change.
4. In Greenland, dependence on marine resources left settlements highly exposed to climate hazards, and the isolation of communities prevented adaptation when faced with climatic, economic, and cultural pressures in the 15th century.
The document provides an overview of population, economic, and employment trends in the Austin metropolitan statistical area (MSA). Some key points:
- The Austin MSA population grew 41.4% between 1999-2009, among the fastest growing of major US metro areas.
- The region is projected to add over 112,000 new jobs in the next 5 years and see continued strong economic and population growth.
- Major employers in the Austin area include Dell, IBM, Seton Healthcare, St. David's Healthcare, Apple, National Instruments, and Whole Foods Market. The area has attracted many new and expanded operations from companies like Oracle, Samsung, and PayPal.
The document summarizes demographic trends in New York City, focusing on population changes driven by domestic out-migration offset by international immigration and natural increase. While New York City lost around 800,000 domestic migrants between 2000-2006, it gained over 600,000 immigrants. As a result, the city was able to continue growing its population despite net domestic out-migration. Immigrants have become an increasingly important source of population growth for New York, comprising around one-third of the city's total population in 2006. The immigrant population helps fuel secondary population growth through higher birth rates among immigrant communities.
This document summarizes 2010 Census data for the 9 wards of Evanston, Illinois. It shows population changes from 2000 to 2010, with some wards increasing and others decreasing in population. While the city's total population rose by 0.33%, redistricting of ward boundaries is not mandatory but could be done discretionally. The document outlines principles and timeframes for potential redistricting, and notes GIS tools are available to analyze ward demographics and mapping.
The document provides an overview of the commercial real estate market and rental housing market outlook for 2011. It summarizes employment trends in 2010 which showed growth in many sectors. It also discusses capital market conditions, property fundamentals like rents and vacancies for apartments, offices, and retail properties from 2000-2011. Overall vacancy rates are expected to decline while rents are forecasted to rise across major property types in 2011.
The document summarizes population and economic trends in the 11-county Atlanta region from 2022. It finds that the region grew by over 64,000 people between 2021 and 2022 to a total population of over 5 million. Gwinnett County saw the largest numeric increase while Henry County had the highest percentage growth. The City of Atlanta rebounded from slower growth in 2020-2021. Housing demand remains high across the region although building permit activity has not returned to pre-Great Recession levels. Job growth in the Atlanta region was strong in 2022, outpacing national trends. Most new housing construction is occurring in the outer suburban and exurban counties.
This document provides demographic data and trends for Howard County, Maryland. It discusses population growth which has averaged around 2,000 new residential units per year. The population is aging with growth among those 65 and older outpacing other groups. Employment has grown by around 25,000 jobs since 2000 and is projected to increase by 70,000 more by 2020. Future development is planned through allocation of housing units across planning regions in the county.
Economic Growth in Central Texas: The Promise and Reality of Prosperity in ou...Civic Analytics LLC
The document discusses economic growth in Austin, Texas. It finds that Austin has experienced rapid population growth in recent decades, ranking 11th nationally since 2000, primarily due to domestic migration from other parts of Texas and other states. This growth has been fueled by a strong tech sector and job market. However, concerns are raised that not all residents have benefited equally from the economic expansion, and that infrastructure and housing affordability challenges threaten future sustainability unless addressed. The discussion section focuses on improving education levels and workforce training to ensure inclusive economic participation.
This month's Regional Snapshot explores ARC’s annual population estimates for 2014 to assess how we are recovering from the slowdown we experienced during the Great Recession.
Population Estimates, Methods, Procedures & Local GovtRobert Hiett
This document discusses population estimates and projections for North Carolina municipalities and counties. It provides population data from 1970 to present and projections out to 2038. It summarizes population change from 2010 to 2018 for North Carolina and other states. It also discusses the roles and responsibilities of the US Census Bureau and North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management in producing population estimates used for planning and distributing state and federal funds. Accurate 2020 Census counts are important for producing reliable population estimates.
Austin is experiencing rapid population growth, averaging 49% each decade since the 1960s. This growth is fueled mainly by domestic migration, as 61% of new households moving to Austin come from other parts of Texas. Key factors attracting newcomers include a strong economy with 13.9% job growth since 2009, second only to Nashville. While housing costs in Austin remain competitive for now, affordability is declining with median home prices rising 65% in the last decade. High-paying jobs in technology, engineering, healthcare and education are contributing to Austin's status as an attractive place to live and work.
7.2 square miles. That is Greater Downtown Detroit. A slice of Detroit’s 139-square mile geography. A 7.2 square mile collection of neighborhoods: Downtown, Midtown, New Center, Woodbridge, Eastern Market, Lafayette Park, Rivertown, and Corktown—and so much more.
Like city-centers globally, downtowns are owned by everyone—welcoming residents, employees, visitors, and tourists. Greater Downtown contains high-rise and low-rise living, our richest cultural assets, the center of Detroit’s business world, the region’s sports and entertainment hub, some of the city’s most storied neighborhoods, and some of Southeast Michigan’s leading educational and medical institutions.
7.2 SQ MI is the data story of a physically and economically changing place. It is a snapshot that captures current information on residing, working, employing, visiting, living, playing, and investing in Greater Downtown. While a celebration of progress, it also acknowledges continued challenges and reveals potential opportunity.
We believe after reading 7.2 SQ MI you will see the momentum of today in Greater Downtown Detroit and the promise of tomorrow.
The Hudson-Webber Foundation
Detroit, Michigan, February 2013
$417
Boston $385 Back Bay $706
New York $375 Tribeca $1,450
Denver $225 Cherry Creek $525
Austin $185 Tarrytown $325
Dallas $150 Preston Hollow $300
Houston $135 Tanglewood $325
Phoenix $135 Paradise Valley $325
January 30, 2013 | CCIM Symposium: Growing Pains of Austin
This document summarizes key population and housing data from the 2010 Census for Massachusetts and the Metropolitan Area Planning Council region. Some of the key findings include:
- The population grew 3.1% in Massachusetts and the MAPC region between 2000-2010. Developing suburbs saw the largest growth at 5.8%.
- Several cities like Lawrence, Chelsea, and Springfield became "majority-minority" communities, where racial/ethnic minorities make up over 50% of the population.
- The population is growing more racially diverse, with minorities making up a larger share of those under 18 compared to those over 18.
- Housing units increased 7% in Massachusetts and the MAPC region
Webster City, Iowa is located at the crossroads of Interstate 35 and Highway 20. It has a skilled workforce and low costs of doing business that have attracted many world-class companies. The city expects to continue attracting businesses due to its business-friendly climate with available sites, utilities, and financial incentives. It has a population of around 8,000 people and a median household income of $45,544.
The document summarizes population trends in Boston from 1950 to 2010 based on US Census Bureau data. It finds that Boston's population peaked in 1950 and declined afterwards but has grown since 2000. The 2010 Census marked the first time since 1970 that Boston's population exceeded 600,000. Boston's population growth between 2000-2010 compares favorably to other northeastern cities and its rate was higher than New York City and San Francisco. Boston also has a young population and is becoming more racially and ethnically diverse with time.
Robert Knakal is the chairman and founding partner of Massey Knakal Realty Services, a commercial real estate brokerage firm. This document provides an overview and analysis of the New York City multi-family residential sales market from 2005 to 2011 based on data from Massey Knakal. It includes statistics on total sales volume, number of properties sold, average sale price per property, and capitalization rates for walk-up and elevator buildings across the five boroughs over this period.
Over the last 20 years in Boston, there has been:
- 80 million square feet of new development added, including 21,618 housing units and 7,140 hotel rooms.
- 9.4 million square feet of new office space, accounting for 11% of Boston's total square footage.
- $8.8 billion worth of projects currently under construction or breaking ground in 2013, totaling 23.1 million square feet, 11,372 residential units, and across 63 projects.
Home sales in British Columbia were relatively unchanged in June 2021 compared to the same month the previous year. The average home price rose 14.4% to $571,837 in June 2021 compared to June 2020. While sales were steady, low interest rates and expected growth in employment are factors that may increase consumer incentive for home purchases over the summer. Year-to-date, home sales dollar volume increased 15.5% compared to the same period in 2020.
Population estimates for the major jurisdictions in the 10-county Atlanta region is one of ARC's signature products. This presents ARC's 2013 population estimates which show the region added 40,100 new residents over the past year.
The Phoenix housing market summary document discusses 1) strengths of the Phoenix market including population and income growth, educated workforce, and lack of natural disasters, 2) concerns around high home inventories and foreclosures, and tight credit, and 3) a forecast that predicts continued population growth but a slowing housing market in 2009 due to economic challenges.
1. In the Faroe Islands, the Norse developed a sustainable agricultural system utilizing wild resources and established clustered settlements, allowing them to successfully adapt to climate changes over centuries.
2. In Iceland, the Norse also initially implemented environmental management and regulation, but soil erosion increased after woodlands were cleared and sheep numbers rose, degrading the landscape.
3. In Greenland, the Norse settlement focused on marine resources and became rigidly dependent on them, unable to adapt when climate change made travel more difficult and economic and cultural changes occurred in the 15th century, leading to the abandonment of the settlements.
1. The Norse settlements in the Faroe Islands, Iceland, and Greenland faced different challenges from climate change and made different choices, leading to different outcomes.
2. In the Faroe Islands, sustainable practices, utilization of wild resources, limited landscape impacts, and successful adaptation to climate change led to long-term settlement success.
3. In Iceland, early environmental management and regulation allowed sustainable exploitation but significant landscape degradation occurred when faced with unpredictable climate change.
4. In Greenland, dependence on marine resources left settlements highly exposed to climate hazards, and the isolation of communities prevented adaptation when faced with climatic, economic, and cultural pressures in the 15th century.
Zoning is a law that regulates land use by dividing areas into zones with regulations regarding use, form, and density. The first comprehensive zoning code was established in New York City in 1916 and divided the city into use districts and regulated building heights. The 1961 New York City Zoning Resolution introduced concepts like floor area ratios, tower-in-the-park designs, and bonuses for including public spaces. It has since been amended with special districts, contextual zoning, waterfront zoning, mixed-use districts, and initiatives promoting sustainability.
The document discusses how dense cities like New York City are more sustainable and energy efficient than less dense urban and suburban areas. It provides data showing that New Yorkers use less energy for housing and transportation than average Americans due to living in small, efficient homes and relying heavily on public transit, walking, and biking instead of personal vehicles. Denser urban areas concentrate populations and infrastructure to reduce per capita energy consumption and environmental impact.
The document outlines the challenges facing New York City in the coming decades, including population growth, aging infrastructure, and environmental threats. It projects the city's population will grow to over 9 million by 2030, with Queens and Staten Island surpassing their historic highs. It also notes the infrastructure is aging and the quality of air, water, and land still need improvement, while climate change poses a new threat. The plan seeks to address these challenges to create a greener, greater New York City.
The document is an update to PlaNYC, New York City's long-term sustainability plan from April 2011. It summarizes the challenges facing New York in areas like growth, infrastructure, climate change, and the economy. It then outlines the city's progress since 2007 in meeting the original goals of PlaNYC, including adding parkland, creating affordable housing, improving transportation, planting trees, and making buildings more energy efficient. However, it notes that more work remains to fully achieve the long-term vision.
This document outlines the major milestones and reforms in New York City's urban planning history from the early Dutch settlement through modern day. Some key events and developments include the Commissioner's Plan of 1811 that established the grid street system, the construction of the Erie Canal that fueled industrialization and population growth, consolidation of the five boroughs into New York City in 1898, and Robert Moses' massive public works projects in the 1920s-1970s that transformed the city's infrastructure and landscape. The post-WWII period saw urban renewal efforts, the decline of areas like the South Bronx in the 1970s, and the city's fiscal crisis, followed by revitalization programs under Mayors Koch and Bloomberg that sought to increase affordable
1. The Dynamics of Population Change
in New York’s Neighborhoods
Presentation for the Macaulay Honors College
The City University of New York
January 24, 2013
Joseph Salvo
POPULATION DIVISION
TM
3. Population Change for the 10 Largest Cities in the U.S., 2000 to 2010
Ranked by Population in 2010
Geographic Area Total Population Population Change
2000-2010
Rank NYC and Boroughs 2000 2010 Number Percent
1 New York, NY* 8,008,278 8,175,133 166,855 2.1
2 Los Angeles, CA* 3,694,820 3,792,621 97,801 2.7
3 Chicago, IL 2,896,016 2,695,598 -200,418 -6.9
Brooklyn, NY 2,465,326 2,504,700 39,374 1.6
Queens, NY* 2,229,379 2,230,722 1,343 0.1
4 Houston, TX* 1,953,631 2,099,451 145,820 7.5
Manhattan, NY 1,537,195 1,585,873 48,678 3.2
5 Philadelphia, PA 1,517,550 1,526,006 8,456 0.6
6 Phoenix, AZ* 1,321,045 1,445,632 124,587 9.4
Bronx, NY 1,332,650 1,385,108 52,458 3.9
7 San Antonio, TX* 1,144,646 1,327,407 182,761 16.0
8 San Diego, CA* 1,223,400 1,307,402 84,002 6.9
9 Dallas, TX* 1,188,580 1,197,816 9,236 0.8
10 San Jose, CA* 894,943 945,942 50,999 5.7
*Achieved population peak in 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census PL 94-171 Files
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
4. Population Change
New York City and Boroughs, 2010-2011
Change, 2010-2011
2010 2011 Number Percent
New York City 8,175,133 8,244,910 69,777 0.9
Bronx 1,385,108 1,392,002 6,894 0.5
Brooklyn 2,504,700 2,532,645 27,945 1.1
Manhattan 1,585,873 1,601,948 16,075 1.0
Queens 2,230,722 2,247,848 17,126 0.8
Staten Island 468,730 470,467 1,737 0.4
Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 2010 Census-Summary File 1 and 2011 Population Estimates Program
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
5. Estimated Components of Population Change
New York City, 2010-2011
Population Change
Natural Increase
Net Migration
Net International
Migration
Net Domestic
Migration
-75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100
Thousands
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011 Estimates Program
as revised by Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
6. Total Population by Nativity
New York City, 1970 to 2010
Percent
Foreign-born
6,457,740 1,437,058 18.2
5,401,440 1,670,199 23.6
5,239,633 2,082,931 28.4
5,137,246 2,871,032 35.9
5,142,584 3,042,315 37.2
Source: U.S. Census of Population, 1970 to 2000; 2010 American Community Survey-Full Sample
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
7. Top Countries of Birth for the Foreign-born
New York City and United States, 2010
New York City United States
Dominican
Republic
13%
China*
11%
Other
45%
Total = 3,042,315 Total = 39,955,673
Mexico
6%
Jamaica
6%
Guyana
5%
Russia Ecuador
4%
2% India Trinidad & Haiti
Tobago 3%
2%
3%
* Includes Hong Kong and Taiwan Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey-FactFinder
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
8. Population Distribution by Race/Hispanic Origin
New York City and Boroughs, 2010
100%
Other &
multiracial, no
nhispanic
75% Asian, nonhisp
anic
Black, nonhisp
50% anic
Hispanic
25%
White, nonhisp
anic
0%
NYC Bronx Brooklyn Manhattan Queens Staten
Island
Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 2010 Census-Summary File 1
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
9. Hispanic and Asian Subgroups
New York City, 2010
Hispanic Asian*
Vietnamese
1%
Japanese
2%
Other
Other Pakistani 6%
16% 4%
Cuban
2% Puerto
Bangladeshi
Honduran Rican
5%
2% 31%
Colombian Filipino
4% 7% Chinese**
Total = 2,336,076 Total = 1,038,388 47%
Ecuadorian
7%
Korean
9%
Mexican
13% Dominican
Republic Asian Indian
25% 19%
*Includes a small number of Asians who are of Hispanic origin.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census-Summary File 1
** Includes Taiwanese Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
10. Population by Hispanic Subgroup
New York City, 2000-2010
Percent
Change = -11.2 8.2 73.7 14.9 7.9 -11.7 -8.5 10.1
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
Puerto Rican Dominican Mexican Ecuadorian Central Colombian Cuban Peruvian
American
2000 2010
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Simulated Hispanic File; 2010 Census-Summary File 1
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
11. Population by Asian Subgroup
New York City, 2000-2010
Percent
Change = 34.6 12.5 11.9 22.4 73.8 177.7
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
Chinese Asian Indian Korean Filipino Pakistani Bangladeshi
2000 2010
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Censuses-Summary File 1
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
13. Neighborhood Tabulation Areas*
New York City, 2010 N Riverdale
Fieldston
Riverdale
Woodlawn
Wakefield
Willmsbridge
Spuyten Duyvil Olinville
Kingsbridge Eastchstr
Marble Hl
Norwood
V Cortlandt Vlg
Bedfrd Pk
Ednwld Co-Op City
Baychstr
Bronx
Inwood Fordhm N
Kingsbridge Hts Bronxdale Allerton
Pelham Gdns
Wash Hts N Fordhm SBelmont
University Hts Pelham Pkwy
Morris Hts
Mt Hope Van Nest
Morris Pk Pelham Bay
Clarmnt Tremont
E Westchtr Sq Country Club
Bathgate City Island
Wash Hts S
Parkchstr
E Conc W Farms
Conc Vlg Bronx Riv Westchstr
Unionprt
Morrisania Soundview
Hamilton Hts Melrose Bruckner Schuylerville
Throgs Nck
Soundview Edgewater Pk
Manhattanville MelroseLongwood
S Castle Hl
Manhattan
Mott Haven N Clason Pt
Harding Pk
Hunts Pt
Morningside Hts Mott Haven
Prt Morris
Central Hrlm S
E Hrlm N
Upper W Side E Hrlm S
Rikers Island
Whitestone
Queens
Ft Totten
Bay Ter
College Pt Clearvw
Lincoln Sq Yorkville Steinway LAGUARDIA
Upper E Side AIRPORT
Carnegie Hl Old Astoria
Murray Hl
Lenox Hl
Clinton Roosevelt Is Douglas Mnr
Midtown Flushing Bayside Douglaston
Astoria E Elmhurst Bayside Hls Little Nck
Midtown S Queensbridge Jackson Hts
Turtle Bay Ravenswood E Flushing
E Midtown LIC N Corona
Hudson Yrds
Chelsea Glen Oaks
Flat Iron Murray Hl Woodside Auburndale Floral Pk
Union Sq Kips Bay Elmhurst Queensboro Hl Oakland Gdns New Hyde Pk
Hunters Pt Corona
Sunnyside Elmhurst
Gramercy W Maspeth Maspeth Fresh Mdws
Pomonok Bellerose
W Vlg Stuy Town Flushing Hts Utopia
Cooper Vlg Greenpoint Hillcrest
E Vlg Rego Pk
Maspeth
SoHo Kew Gdns Hls
TriBeCa Forest Hls
Civic Ctr Jamaica Ests
Little Italy Lower E Side N Side Middle Vlg Holliswood Queens Vlg
Chinatown S Side E Williamsburg Briarwood
Jamaica Hls Hollis
Battery Pk City Kew Gdns
Lower MN DUMBO Ridgewood
Vinegar Hl Williamsburg Glendale Jamaica
Dwntwn BK
Boerum Hl
BK Hts Richmond Hl S Jamaica Cambria Hts
Cobble Hl
Ft Greene Bedford St Albans
Woodhaven
Stuyvesant Hts
Clinton Hl Cypress Hls
City Line
Carroll Gdns Baisley Pk
Columbia St Prospect Hts
Red Hook Ocean Hl Ozone Pk S Ozone Pk Laurelton
Crown Hts N
Brooklyn Pk Slope
Gowanus
Crown Hts S E New York (PA Ave)
Brownsville
Springfield Gdns N
Springfield Gdns S
Brookville
Prospect Lffrts Gdns E New York
Wingate Lindenwood Rosedale
Howard Bch
Windsor Ter Rugby
Sunset Pk W Remsen Vlg
Starrett City JOHN F. KENNEDY
Erasmus INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
W New Brighton Sunset Pk E Flatbush
New Brighton Kensington
St George Ocean Pkwy E Flatbush
Farragut Canarsie
Mariner's Hbr
Arlington New Brighton
Prt Ivory Borough Pk
Graniteville Silver Lake
Bay Rdg Flatlands Grgtwn
Dyker Hts Marine Pk
Grymes Hl Midwood Bergen Bch
Clifton Ocean Pkwy S Mill Basin
Westerleigh Fox Hls
Stapleton Bensonhurst W
Rosebank
New Springville Madison
Bloomfield Grasmere Bath Bch Far Rckwy
Travis Arrochar Bensonhurst E Bayswater
Ft Wadsworth
Staten Old Town
Dongan Hls
Gravesend
Homecrest
Sheepshead Bay
Gerritsen Bch
Hammels
Arverne
Edgemere
Todt Hl S Bch MN Bch
Island Emerson Hl
Heartlnd Vlg
Lghthouse Hl
New Dorp
Seagate
Coney Is
Brighton Bch
W Brighton
Midland Bch
Oakwood
Oakwood Bch Breezy Pt
Belle Hbr
Rckwy Pk
Arden Hts Broad Channel
Great Kills
Rossville
Woodrow
Annadale
Huguenot
Charleston Prince's Bay
Richmond Vly
* Neighborhood Tabulation Areas or NTAs, are Tottenville
Eltingvl
aggregations of census tracts that are subsets of
New York City's 55 Public Use Microdata Areas
(PUMAs). Primarily due to these
constraints, NTA boundaries and their associated
names may not definitively represent Source: Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
14. Population Growth by Race/Hispanic Origin
New York City, 2000-2010
Percent
Change = -5.1 -2.8 31.8 8.1
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
Black nonhispanic White nonhispanic Asian nonhispanic Hispanic
2000 2010
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau: 2000 and 2010 Censuses-Summary File 1
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
15. Percent Change in Population by Neighborhood Tabulation Area*
New York City, 2000 to 2010
Bronx
Percent Change
Gain of 15.0% or more (8 neighborhoods) Manhattan Queens
9.0% to 14.9% (25)
6.0% to 8.9% (17) LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
3.0% to 5.9% (31)
-2.9% to 2.9% (74)
-3.0% to -5.9% (17)
-6.0% to -8.9% (10)
-9.0% to -14.9% (6)
Brooklyn
JOHN F. KENNEDY
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Staten
Island
* Neighborhood Tabulation Areas or NTAs, are
aggregations of census tracts that are subsets of
New York City's 55 Public Use Microdata Areas
(PUMAs). Primarily due to these
constraints, NTA boundaries and their associated Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 2000 and 2010 Censuses-Summary File 1
names may not definitively represent Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
16. Percent Change in the Black Nonhispanic Population
by Neighborhood Tabulation Area*
New York City, 2000 to 2010
Bronx
Percent Change
Manhattan Queens
20.0% to 39.9% (3 neighborhoods)
10.0% to 19.9% (9) LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
5.0% to 9.9% (9)
-4.9% to 4.9% (19)
-5.0% to -9.9% (15)
-10.0% to -19.9% (23)
-20.0% to -39.9% (10)
Loss of 40.0% or more (1)
Less than 5,000 Black NH
in 2000 and 2010 Brooklyn
JOHN F. KENNEDY
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Staten
Island
* Neighborhood Tabulation Areas or NTAs, are
aggregations of census tracts that are subsets of
New York City's 55 Public Use Microdata Areas
(PUMAs). Primarily due to these
constraints, NTA boundaries and their associated Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 2000 and 2010 Censuses-Summary File 1
names may not definitively represent Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
17. Percent Change in the White Nonhispanic Population
by Neighborhood Tabulation Area*
New York City, 2000 to 2010
Bronx
Percent Change
Gain of 40.0% or more (18 neighborhoods) Manhattan Queens
20.0% to 39.9% (4)
10.0% to 19.9% (8) LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
5.0% to 9.9% (11)
-4.9% to 4.9% (25)
-5.0% to -9.9% (16)
-10.0% to -19.9% (22)
-20.0% to -39.9% (29)
Loss of 40.0% or more (6)
Less than 5,000 White NH
in 2000 and 2010 Brooklyn
JOHN F. KENNEDY
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Staten
Island
* Neighborhood Tabulation Areas or NTAs, are
aggregations of census tracts that are subsets of
New York City's 55 Public Use Microdata Areas
(PUMAs). Primarily due to these
constraints, NTA boundaries and their associated Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 2000 and 2010 Censuses-Summary File 1
names may not definitively represent Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
18. Percent Change in the Asian Nonhispanic Population
by Neighborhood Tabulation Area*
New York City, 2000 to 2010
Bronx
Percent Change
Gain of 40.0% or more (25 neighborhoods) Manhattan Queens
20.0% to 39.9% (27)
10.0% to 19.9% (5) LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
5.0% to 9.9% (2)
-4.9% to 4.9% (2)
-5.0% to -9.9% (3)
-10.0% to -19.9% (1)
Less than 5,000 Asian NH
in 2000 and 2010 Brooklyn
JOHN F. KENNEDY
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Staten
Island
* Neighborhood Tabulation Areas or NTAs, are
aggregations of census tracts that are subsets of
New York City's 55 Public Use Microdata Areas
(PUMAs). Primarily due to these
constraints, NTA boundaries and their associated Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 2000 and 2010 Censuses-Summary File 1
names may not definitively represent Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
19. Percent Change in the Hispanic Population
by Neighborhood Tabulation Area*
New York City, 2000 to 2010
Bronx
Percent Change
Gain of 40.0% or more (21 neighborhoods) Manhattan Queens
20.0% to 39.9% (16)
10.0% to 19.9% (24) LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
5.0% to 9.9% (17)
-4.9% to 4.9% (24)
-5.0% to -9.9% (7)
-10.0% to -19.9% (14)
-20.0% to -39.9% (6)
Less than 5,000 Hispanic
in 2000 and 2010 Brooklyn
JOHN F. KENNEDY
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Staten
Island
* Neighborhood Tabulation Areas or NTAs, are
aggregations of census tracts that are subsets of
New York City's 55 Public Use Microdata Areas
(PUMAs). Primarily due to these
constraints, NTA boundaries and their associated Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 2000 and 2010 Censuses-Summary File 1
names may not definitively represent Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
20. Persons by English Language Ability
New York City, 2010
Not
English
Speaks Proficient
language 1,816,599
other than 24% Speaks
English English at
at home Home
3,889,483
49% English 51%
3,781,160 Proficient
1,964,561
25%
Total Persons Ages 5 and Over = 7,670,643
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey-Public Use Microdata Sample
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
21. Limited English Proficient Population
by Language Spoken at Home
New York City, 2010
Number Percent
Total LEP 1,816,599 100.0
Top LEP Languages
Spanish 915,742 50.4
Chinese* 299,560 16.5
Russian 113,943 6.3
French Creole 48,501 2.7
Korean 47,201 2.6
Italian 39,076 2.2
Bengali 38,714 2.1
Polish 29,928 1.6
Yiddish 29,768 1.6
Arabic 26,607 1.5
* Includes Chinese, Cantonese, Mandarin, and Formosan
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey-Public Use Microdata Sample
Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
22. Limited English Proficient Population for the Population 5 Years and over
by Neighborhood Tabulation Area*
New York City, 2006-2010
Bronx
Manhattan
Percent Queens
50.0% or more (9 neighborhoods)
40.0 % to 49.9% (12)
30.0% to 39.9% (40)
20.0% to 29.9% (35) NYC Average = 23.4%
Less than 20% (92)
Brooklyn
Staten
Island
* Neighborhood Tabulation Areas or NTAs, are
aggregations of census tracts that are subsets of
New York City's 55 Public Use Microdata Areas
(PUMAs). Primarily due to these
constraints, NTA boundaries and their associated Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey-FactFinder
names may not definitively represent Population Division-New York City Department of City Planning
23. Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics of
New York City’s Top 10 Foreign-born Groups, 2010
Educational Attainment3
% Limited % High School % College
Total English Graduate Graduate
Population Sex Ratio Proficient2 or Higher or Higher
Total 8,185,314 90 23.7 79.3 33.3
Native-born 5,138,863 93 6.5 86.2 39.7
Foreign-born 3,046,451 87 50.0 71.7 26.3
Dominican Republic 378,199 71 69.9 55.6 10.7
China1 351,314 89 78.3 59.9 25.1
Mexico 187,086 144 83.3 42.2 4.8
Jamaica 169,863 75 0.7 77.9 19.3
Guyana 138,549 83 2.3 77.2 19.0
Ecuador 138,097 112 77.0 58.8 9.8
Haiti 97,516 72 50.2 79.7 17.6
Trinidad and Tobago 84,347 66 0.4 86.3 15.9
India 72,803 112 37.9 81.9 52.8
Russia 70,123 70 63.5 91.3 49.3
1 Includes Hong Kong and Taiwan
2 Persons 5 years and over
3 Persons 25 years and over
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey-Public Use Microdata Sample
Population Division- New York City Department of City Planning
24. Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics of
New York City’s Top 10 Foreign-born Groups, 2010
Income and Poverty
Labor Force Median
Participation Rate 4 Household Poverty
Males Females Income Rate
Total 75.9 66.7 $48,366 20.3
Native-born 70.3 67.1 $51,792 21.3
Foreign-born 83.2 66.1 $44,335 18.6
Dominican Republic 77.6 66.4 $30,229 25.9
China1 76.7 66.4 $40,506 21.5
Mexico 94.3 48.9 $37,282 28.5
Jamaica 78.8 82.9 $49,374 13.4
Guyana 81.7 76.5 $60,457 9.0
Ecuador 89.1 59.8 $43,731 17.2
Haiti 80.8 74.4 $44,940 16.2
Trinidad and Tobago 80.4 77.2 $42,320 14.3
India 81.9 56.5 $61,667 13.1
Russia 83.2 73.3 $42,320 14.8
1 Includes Hong Kong and Taiwan
4 Persons 16-64 years old
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey-Public Use Microdata Sample
Population Division- New York City Department of City Planning
25. Data Links
• DCP Population Division Web site:
www.nyc.gov/population
• New York City Census FactFinder:
http://gis.nyc.gov/dcp/pa/address.jsp
• Census Bureau Web site:
www.census.gov
Editor's Notes
Total Births 121,736 100.0 Foreign-born 62,769 51.6