SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 38
Download to read offline
Sponsored by
2010: Active in the Halls of Government
•   Santa Cruz rental inspection ordinance
•   San Jose reduces rent control fees
•   San Jose protects owners liability
•   Menlo Park goes smoke‐free (sort of)
•   Campbell business license tax
•   Mountain View scales back relocation program
•   Electoral success




         Active in the Halls of Government
CAA Tri‐County’s efforts saved rental owners
     –   $2.00/unit in San Jose
     –   Burdensome calculations in Campbell
     –   $38/unit in Santa Cruz
     –   Liability for a tenant’s unruly behavior
     –   Posting signs throughout their property
Rental Housing Market Outlook 2011
                                     Steve Seligman
                           Vice President & Regional Manager
                                   Marcus & Millichap




    2011 CAA Tri-County Outlook




Steven Seligman – Regional Manager
EMPLOYMENT TRENDS




             U.S. Employment Change by Sector
                          2010

                 U.S. Employment Sectors              Absolute Change   % Change
             Education & Health Services                  422,000         2.2%
             Prof. & Business Services                    366,000         2.2%
             Leisure & Hospitality                        240,000         1.8%
             Trade, Transport & Utilities                 227,000         0.9%
             Manufacturing                                136,000         1.2%
             Natural Resources & Mining                   92,000         13.6%
             Other Services                               65,000          1.2%
                                         Total Gain      1,548,000
             Information                                  (37,000)       -1.3%
             Financial Activities                         (72,000)       -0.9%
             Construction                                 (93,000)       -1.6%
             Government                                  (222,000)       -1.0%
                                         Total Loss      (424,000)

Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, BLS
Employment Absolute Change by Metro
                                              Forecast 2011
                                 Top 15                                                Bottom 15
                                 Markets                   Abs Chg        % Chg        Markets                    Abs Chg         % Chg

                                 Washington, DC             85,300         2.9%        Las Vegas                  14,000           1.8%

                                 New York City              84,000         2.3%        Oakland                    13,400           1.4%

                                 Dallas-Fort Worth          77,000         2.7%        Cincinnati                 13,200           1.3%

                                 Houston                    65,000         2.6%        Kansas City                13,000           1.4%

                                 Los Angeles                56,000         1.5%        Salt Lake City             12,000           2.0%

                                 Chicago                    52,500         1.3%        West Palm Beach            12,000           2.4%

                                 Boston                     49,000         2.1%        Cleveland                  11,000           1.1%

                                 Atlanta                    37,000         1.6%        Fort Lauderdale             9,500           1.4%

                                 Orange County              36,000         2.6%        Sacramento                  9,500           1.2%

                                 Phoenix                    36,000         2.1%        Jacksonville                9,000           1.6%

                                 Seattle-Tacoma             36,000         2.2%        Detroit                     8,400           0.5%

                                 Austin                     28,000         3.6%        Tucson                      7,800           2.2%

                                 Philadelphia               28,000         1.0%        Baltimore                   7,376           0.6%

                                 Minneapolis                25,500         1.5%        Louisville                  7,000           1.2%

                                 Denver                     24,000         2.0%        Oklahoma City               4,976           0.9%
                                 U.S. Total                2,000,000       1.5%        U.S. Total                2,000,000         1.5%


* San Jose: +21,000 (+2.5%), San Francisco: +20,400 (+2.2%)
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, BLS




                                                              Employment Trends
                                                           Bay Area vs. United States
                                 8%                        2000-2008          2009         2010*              2011**
 Year-over-Year Percent Change




                                 4%



                                 0%



                                 -4%



                                 -8%
                                                 San Jose              San Francisco             Oakland               United States
            2009 :                               -55,900                  -59,600                   -60,200                  -4,740,000
            2010* :                               +7,000                  -11,300                   -12,000                  +1,124,000
            2011** :                             +21,000                  +20,400                   +13,400                  +2,000,000

* Year-end estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, BLS
CAPITAL MARKETS




                          Recent 10-Year Treasury Movement Reflects the Power of
                              Market Sentiment, Expectations and Uncertainty
                                                           150K+ Monthly Private
                                                            Employment Growth
                           4.00   “Cash for Clunkers”                              BP Oil
                                         Ends                                       Spill
                                                                                            Euro Debt
                           3.75                                                               Crisis
                                                                                                              Bush-Era Tax
 10-Year Treasury Rates




                                                                                                              Cuts Extended
                           3.50                                                     Disappointing Private
                                                                                    Employment Growth
                                                        Healthcare Reform Bill
                           3.25                           Signed into Law                              Retail Sales
                                                                                                   Exceed Expectations

                           3.00
                                                                        1Q10 U.S. GDP                      QE2
                                                                        Revised Down                     Announced
                           2.75                                            To 2.7%

                                                                                    2Q10 China
                           2.50                                                     GDP Slows
                                                                                     To 10.3%      Lower Jobless
                                                                                                      Claims
                           2.25
                          Se 0
                                  9

                          Se 9




                                10

                          Au 0
                          M 10
                          M 0

                          Ap 0
                          O 9


                          D 9




                          O 0


                          D 0
                          Fe 0
                          N 9




                          N 0
                          Ju 0
                          Ja 9




                                  0
                                1
                              l-0

                              l-0




                              l-1
                                1
                               -1
                               -0




                               -1




                               -1
                                0


                               -0




                                1


                               -1
                                1
                               -0




                               -1
                              r-



                             n-



                             g-
                             b-
                             p-




                             p-
                            n-
                           ov




                           ov
                            ar
                            ct




                            ct
                           ay
                           ec




                           ec
                           Ju

                           Ju




                           Ju




Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Federal Reserve
Core Inflation vs. 10-Year Treasury
                                     Core Inflation                             10-Year Treasury
                    20%
                                     Avg. Core Inflation                        Avg. 10-Year Treasury



                    15%
    Rate




                    10%

                                                                                                        7.21%


                                                                                                        4.41%
                    5%




                    0%
                      70

                      72

                      74

                      76

                      78

                      80

                      82

                      84

                      86

                      88

                      90

                      92

                      94

                      96

                      98

                      00

                      02

                      04

                      06

                      08

                      10
                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    19

                    20

                    20

                    20

                    20

                    20

                    20
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Economy.com, Federal Reserve




                              U.S. Commercial Mortgage
                          Delinquency Rates by Lender Type
                                 CMBS (30+ days and REO)                          Life Companies (60+ days)
                                 Fannie Mae (60+ days)                            Freddie Mac (60+ days)
                    10%          Banks & Thrifts (90+ days)


                    8%
Delinquency Rates




                    6%

                    4%

                    2%

                    0%
                    4Q 997
                    4Q 998
                    4Q 99
                    4Q 000
                    4Q 001
                    4Q 002
                    4Q 003
                    4Q 004
                    4Q 005
                    4Q 06
                    1Q 007
                    2Q 008
                    3Q 008
                    4Q 008
                    1Q 008
                    2Q 009
                    3Q 009
                    4Q 009
                    1Q 009
                    2Q 10
                    3Q 010
                        10
                      19




                      20




                      20


                      20
                      1
                      1


                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2


                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2
                      2


                      2
                    4Q




  Delinquency rates at the end of each period
  Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Mortgage Bankers Association
Total Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Debt
           Outstanding: $3.2 trillion*

                                                                                 State & Local
                                                                         Savings Gov't         GSEs and
 By Lender Types ($Bil):                                               Institutions 3%         Ginnie Mae
 Commercial Banks          $1,428.1                                Federal 6%                     10%
                                                                 Government
 CMBS, CDO & Other ABS      $639.9                                   2%
 GSEs and Ginnie Mae        $317.2
                                                          CMBS, CDO
 Life Insurance Companies   $298.6                       and other ABS
 Savings Institutions       $180.1                           issues
                                                               20%
 State & Local Governments   $89.9
 Federal Government           $78.8
 Others                     $169.9                                                                          Commercial
                                                                        Others                                Banks
                                                                          5%                                   45%
                                                                        Life insurance
                                                                          companies
                                                                               9%


* As of 3Q10
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Mortgage Bankers Association




    Sources of Commercial Real Estate Acquisition Financing
                     by Dollar Volume

             100%
                                                                                          Bank -nat'l, int'l, inv bnk
                                                          16%
                       30%              27%
                                                                             35%          Assumed Debt
             75%
                                                                                          CMBS
                                                          36%
                       16%
                                        32%                                               Regional/Local Bank
   Percent




                                                                             25%
             50%
                                                           5%
                                         1%                                               Insurance
                       35%
                                        17%               19%                13%
                                                                                          Seller Financed
             25%
                                                           5%                12%
                                        8%                                                Financial
                       6%               2%                12%                7%
                       7%
                                        13%                                  4%
                       6%                                  7%                4%
              0%
                      2007              2008              2009              2010*

*Through October
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics
U.S. Commercial Mortgage Backed
                                       Securities (CMBS) Issuance
                                                                                 U.S. CMBS
                             $250
  CMBS Issuance (billions)




                             $200


                             $150


                             $100


                              $50


                               $0
                                 95

                                        96

                                               97

                                                      98

                                                             99

                                                                    00

                                                                           01

                                                                                  02

                                                                                         03

                                                                                                04

                                                                                                       05

                                                                                                              06

                                                                                                                     07

                                                                                                                            08

                                                                                                                                   09

                                                                                                                                          10
                               19

                                      19

                                             19

                                                    19

                                                           19

                                                                  20

                                                                         20

                                                                                20

                                                                                       20

                                                                                              20

                                                                                                     20

                                                                                                            20

                                                                                                                   20

                                                                                                                          20

                                                                                                                                 20

                                                                                                                                        20
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Commercial Mortgage Alert




                                             PROPERTY FUNDAMENTALS
U.S. Apartment Rent and Vacancy Trends
                                                               Asking Rent           Vacancy Rate
                                    $1,100                                                                              12%
 Asking Rent per Unit




                                    $1,000                                                                              9%




                                                                                                                              Vacancy Rate
                                     $900                                                                               6%



                                     $800                                                                               3%



                                     $700                                                                               0%
                                                00   01   02   03     04     05     06   07      08   09     10* 11**
* Estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis




                                             Average Apartment Asking Rent

                                       $2,000             2000-2008          2009        2010*        2011**
     Average Asking Rent per Unit




                                       $1,800


                                       $1,600


                                       $1,400


                                       $1,200


                                       $1,000
                                                     Santa Clara              San Mateo                    Alameda


 * Estimate
 **Forecast
 Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis
Average Apartment Vacancy
                                                        2000-2008       2009       2010*        2011**
                              8%



                              6%
           Vacancy




                              4%



                              2%



                              0%
                                          Santa Clara                  San Mateo                  Alameda


* Estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis




                                    U.S. Office Rent and Vacancy Trends
                                                         Asking Rent           Vacancy Rate
                              $30                                                                                   25%
Asking Rent per Square Foot




                              $28                                                                                   20%
                                                                                                                          Vacancy Rate




                              $26                                                                                   15%



                              $24                                                                                   10%



                              $22                                                                                   5%
                                     00    01    02      03   04       05   06     07      08   09       10* 11**
* Estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis
Average Office Asking Rent

                                      $80                 2000-2008   2009   2010*   2011**
   Average Asking Rent per Sq. Ft.




                                      $60



                                      $40



                                      $20



                                       $0
                                             Santa Clara               San Mateo               Alameda

* Estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis




                                                Average Office Vacancy

                                                          2000-2008   2009   2010*   2011**

                                     32%



                                     24%
Vacancy




                                     16%



                                     8%



                                     0%
                                            Santa Clara               San Mateo               Alameda


* Estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis
U.S. Retail Rent and Vacancy Trends
                                                                                      Asking Rent                 Vacancy Rate
                                                              $20                                                                                    12%
Monthly Asking Rent per Square Foot




                                                              $18                                                                                    10%




                                                                                                                                                           Vacancy Rate
                                                              $16                                                                                    8%



                                                              $14                                                                                    6%



                                                              $12                                                                                    4%
                                                                      00   01   02    03      04      05     06      07     08      09    10* 11**
* Estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis




                                                                           Average Retail Asking Rent

                                                                                          2000-2008        2009     2010*        2011**
                                                                    $35
                            Average Asking Rent per Sq. Ft.




                                                                    $30



                                                                    $25



                                                                    $20



                                                                    $15
                                                                            Santa Clara                    San Mateo                      Alameda

* Estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.
Average Retail Vacancy

                                      2000-2008           2009      2010*   2011**
           10%


           8%


           6%
 Vacancy




           4%


           2%


           0%
                        Santa Clara                         San Mateo                Alameda

* Estimate
** Forecast
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.




                                 INVESTMENT TRENDS
National Apartment Price / Cap Rate Trends
                                                                                      Average Price         Cap Rates

                                        $125                                                                                                10%
Average Price per Unit (000s)




                                        $100                                                                                                9%




                                                                                                                                                  Average Cap Rate
                                                            $75                                                                             8%

                                                            $50                                                                             7%

                                                            $25                                                                             6%

                                                                $0                                                                          5%




                                                                                                                                     *
                                                                   01


                                                                          02


                                                                                 03


                                                                                        04


                                                                                               05


                                                                                                       06


                                                                                                              07


                                                                                                                     08


                                                                                                                             09

                                                                                                                                    10
                                                                 20


                                                                        20


                                                                               20


                                                                                      20


                                                                                             20


                                                                                                     20


                                                                                                            20


                                                                                                                   20


                                                                                                                           20

                                                                                                                                  20
* Estimate
Includes sales $1Million and Greater
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Costar Group, Inc.




                                                                          Apartment Prices by County

                                                                                         2002-2008       2009      2010*


                                                                $240
                                Average Price per Unit (000s)




                                                                $180



                                                                $120



                                                                 $60



                                                                  $0
                                                                           Santa Clara                San Mateo                   Alameda

* Preliminary Estimate
Includes Sales $500,000 and above
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.
Apartment Cap Rates by County

                                                          2002-2008       2009       2010*

                                 7%
Average Cap Rate




                                 6%


                                 5%


                                 4%


                                 3%
                                          Santa Clara                 San Mateo                  Alameda


* Preliminary Estimate
Includes Sales $500,000 and above
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.




                                       National Office Price and Cap Rates
                                                         Average Price            Cap Rates

                                $250                                                                        10%
Average Price per Square Foot




                                $200                                                                        9%
                                                                                                                  Average Cap Rate




                                $150                                                                        8%

                                $100                                                                        7%

                                 $50                                                                        6%

                                  $0                                                                        5%
                                                                                                       *
                                     01


                                            02


                                                   03


                                                          04


                                                                 05


                                                                         06


                                                                                07


                                                                                        08


                                                                                                09

                                                                                                       10
                                   20


                                          20


                                                 20


                                                        20


                                                               20


                                                                       20


                                                                              20


                                                                                      20


                                                                                              20

                                                                                                     20




* Estimate
Includes sales $1Million and Greater
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Costar Group, Inc.
Office Prices by County

                                                                2002-2008       2009       2010*


                                        $400
               Average Price per SqFt




                                        $300



                                        $200



                                        $100



                                          $0
                                                 Santa Clara                 San Mateo               Alameda

* Preliminary Estimate
Includes Sales $500,000 and above
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.




                                                 Office Cap Rates by County

                                                               2002-2008      2009       2010*

                                        10%
Average Cap Rate




                                        8%


                                        6%


                                        4%


                                        2%
                                               Santa Clara                 San Mateo               Alameda


* Preliminary Estimate
Includes Sales $500,000 and above
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.
National Retail Price and Cap Rates
                                                                                   Average Price          Cap Rates

                                     $200                                                                                              10%
Average Price per Square Foot




                                     $160                                                                                              9%




                                                                                                                                             Average Cap Rate
                                     $120                                                                                              8%

                                                    $80                                                                                7%

                                                    $40                                                                                6%

                                                         $0                                                                            5%




                                                                                                                                 *
                                                            01


                                                                    02


                                                                           03


                                                                                  04


                                                                                          05


                                                                                                  06


                                                                                                         07


                                                                                                                08


                                                                                                                        09

                                                                                                                                10
                                                          20


                                                                  20


                                                                         20


                                                                                20


                                                                                        20


                                                                                                20


                                                                                                       20


                                                                                                              20


                                                                                                                      20

                                                                                                                              20
* Estimate
Includes sales $1Million and Greater
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Costar Group, Inc.




                                                                         Retail Prices by County

                                                                                    2002-2008      2009       2010*


                                                         $420
                                Average Price per SqFt




                                                         $315



                                                         $210



                                                         $105



                                                           $0
                                                                     Santa Clara                San Mateo                    Alameda

* Preliminary Estimate
Includes Sales $500,000 and above
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.
Retail Cap Rates by County

                                           2002-2008                2009   2010*
                   10%



                   8%
Average Cap Rate




                   6%



                   4%



                   2%
                         Santa Clara                      San Mateo                Alameda


* Preliminary Estimate
Includes Sales $500,000 and above
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.




                                DISTRESSED ASSETS
U.S. Estimated Distressed
                Assets Summary By Property Type

                                                                        Distressed
                                                              $ in Bil.             # of props
                            Office                              $48.3                  1,876
                            Apartment                           $37.9                  2,728
                            Hotel                               $33.0                  1,200
                            Development Site                    $29.3                  1,318
                            Retail                              $24.1                  1,959
                            Industrial                          $9.1                   1,271
                            Other                               $4.2                      402
                            Grand Total                        $186.0                  10,754



* As of November 15, 2010
Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics




          Estimated Distressed Assets Summary
                                      Major Western Markets
                                                                     Distressed
                                                         $ in Mil.                # of props
                            Las Vegas                    $17,954.9                   466
                            Los Angeles                  $7,749.3                    593
                            Inland Empire                $3,236.6                    282
                            San Francisco                $3,063.3                    244
                            Orange County                $3,034.3                    132
                            Seattle                      $2,777.0                    156
                            San Diego                    $2,437.6                    172
                            Oakland                      $2,378.0                    169
                            San Jose                     $2,030.6                    128
                            Sacramento                   $1,976.8                    211
                            Portland                       $621.6                    56
                            Grand Total                  $47,260.0                  2,609

* As of November 15, 2010
Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics
Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By
             Property Type-San Jose

                                                                        Distressed
                                                             $ in Mil.         # of props
                            Office                            $1,124.4               38
                            Hotel                              $264.6                12
                            Development Site                   $211.0                 5
                            Retail                             $164.5                18
                            Industrial                         $133.6                24
                            Apartment                          $132.6                31
                            Grand Total                       $2,030.6               128




* As of November 15, 2010
Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics




     Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By
           Property Type-San Francisco

                                                                        Distressed
                                                             $ in Mil.         # of props
                            Office                            $1,434.1               47
                            Apartment                          $802.5                139
                            Hotel                              $366.9                15
                            Retail                             $234.7                26
                            Industrial                         $158.8                 9
                            Development                         $40.0                 5
                            Grand Total                       $3,037.0               241




* As of November 15, 2010
Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics
Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By
              Property Type-Oakland

                                                                        Distressed
                                                             $ in Mil.         # of props
                            Office                             $643.7                33
                            Development Site                   $449.1                24
                            Apartment                          $319.6                28
                            Hotel                              $285.1                13
                            Retail                             $247.6                30
                            Industrial                         $143.0                25
                            Grand Total                       $2,088.2               153




* As of November 15, 2010
Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics




     Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By
             Property Type-Bay Area

                                                                        Distressed
                                                             $ in Mil.         # of props
                            Office                            $3,202.2               118
                            Apartment                         $1,254.7               198
                            Hotel                              $916.6                40
                            Development Site                   $700.1                34
                            Retail                             $646.8                74
                            Industrial                         $435.4                58
                            Grand Total                       $7,155.8               522




* As of November 15, 2010
Bay Area includes: San Francisco, San Jose, and Oakland
Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market
Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics
Tri‐County Local Issues Outlook
                    Joshua Howard
                   Executive Director
  California Apartment Association, Tri‐County Division




                  Outlook 2011
            Local government finance
• Local government & school district deficits
   – San Jose $110‐million
   – Mountain View $2‐million
   – San Mateo County $84‐million
• Fee and tax increases 
• School parcel taxes
• Government reform
Measure A
           March 8, 2011 Special Election

$64,000/unit tax on new multi‐family development




                      Outlook 2011
                    Local regulations

  •   Soft story retrofits
  •   Smoking regulations continue
  •   Interest on security deposits
  •   Bed bug liability
Outlook 2011
                 Local rental market
• From the headlines….




                    Outlook 2011
                  Local regulations
•   Just cause
•   Late fee regulations
•   Rental housing database
•   Longer notice period to terminate tenancy
Outlook 2011 
Partnerships for a stronger community
State & National Issues Outlook & Update
       Thomas Bannon, CEO, California Apartment Association
Debra Carlton, Senior Vice President, California Apartment Association




   CAA State Legislative Affairs
2010 Year In Review & Looking Forward
Bills Signed by the Governor




                    Domestic Violence
This new law gives a tenant an option to change the locks if
he/she has written proof that he/she is the victim of domestic
violence. It also provides that a landlord cannot terminate a
tenancy or fail to renew a tenancy based solely upon an act or
acts of domestic violence against a tenant. The law does,
however, specifically give landlords the right to evict the tenant
if he/she allows the perpetrator to visit the property or the
property owner reasonably believes that the presence of the
        perpetrator poses a physical threat to other tenants,
        guests, or to a tenant's right to quiet enjoyment of the
        property. SB 782 (D-Yee).
Carbon Monoxide Detectors
This new law requires an owner of a housing unit to install a 
carbon monoxide device in each existing dwelling unit that has 
a fossil fuel burning heater or appliance, fireplace, or an 
attached garage: 

For all existing single‐family dwelling units intended for human 
occupancy on or before July 1, 2011.

       For all other existing dwelling units intended for human 
       occupancy on or before January 1, 2013. 
       SB 183 (D‐Lowenthal).




                         Foreclosures
This new law requires a 90 day disclosure be given by a
property owner, informing tenants of their rights when the
property owner terminates a tenancy after a foreclosure action.
At the same time, this new law allows an unlawful detainer
lawsuit to be “masked” by the court permanently if the
buildings was involved in a foreclosure and the unlawful
detainer action against the tenant is never taken to a final
judgment. SB 1149 (D-Corbett).
Bills Vetoed by the Governor




                   Rental Property: Animals

This bill would have prohibited a landlord from advertising or
establishing rental policies that required a tenant or a potential
tenant with an animal to have that animal debarked or
declawed. AB 2743 (D-Nava).
Recycling
This bill attempted to mandate commercial recycling on private
businesses (rental property) that produced more than four
cubic yards of waste a week. It modified existing local
permitting requirements and required the Department of
Resource Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to provide the
Legislature with a report on the progress being made by the
state towards a 75 percent diversion goal.
AB 737 (D-Chesbro).




             2011 Legislative Make-Up
State Senate
      25 Democrats ‐ 15 Republicans          
      (5 Moderates)
• Balance of Power remained unchanged  
• 10 new Senators elected (6 Dem, 4 Rep)
• CAAPAC supported 10 of 10
• 1 new Moderate Democrat (Vargas, D‐San 
      Diego)
• 2 seats away from 2/3 majority 




               State Assembly

     52 Democrats ‐ 28 Republicans          
     (6‐8 Moderates)

•   28 new Assemblymembers elected
•   17 Democrats  ‐ 11 Republicans 
•   CAAPAC supported 24 of 28
•   Democrats gained 1 seat
•   2 seats away from 2/3 majority (3 in 2010)
Looking Ahead
Anticipated Legislative Activity




     Funding, Finance & State Budget
 Publicly Traded Companies – Increase in Property Tax –
       Definitional Changes to Change in Ownership

 Rental Property Owner Tracking Payments to Contractors –
      Withholding

 Permanent Source of Funding for Affordable Housing –
     Escrow Fees

 1031 Exchanges – Eliminate Tax Benefits
Landlord‐Tenant
  Source of Income – Section 8 Protected Status
  Just Cause
  Cap or Eliminate Rental Payment Late Fees

  Rental Housing Registry

  90‐Day Notice for No Cause Evictions

  No‐Smoking Legislation




                Environmental
AB 32 – Changes to Agency Oversight
Mandatory Water Submeters
Prohibit RUBS
Mandatory Recycling
Substandard Housing Violations

  Bed Bug Legislation
 Lead Paint Education – Substantial Equivalency 
with Federal Law




             Employer/Employee
  Eliminate Arbitration Agreements

  Prohibit Credit Screening of Employees

  Prohibit Criminal Screening for some Employees
Governor’s 3 Point Plan

Speak the Truth. No more smoke and
mirrors on the budget
No New Taxes unless approved by people
Return authority to local governments




           Legal Cases
Rental Housing Inspections
 Rental Housing Owners Association of Southern
        Alameda County v. City of Hayward
Issue: May a City enforce an inspection ordinance that
mandates the owner “shall” allow entry into the unit (in
contradiction to state law (which strictly limits the right of
entry into an occupied unit))?

     • Status: Victory at Trial Level. City may not enforce
       requirement. Case is on appeal. CAA Filed
       Amicus Brief in Appellate Court in Decemberl.




                         Section 8
                       Sabi v. Sterling
Issue: Is an owner required to accept a Section 8 voucher from a
disabled tenant? Specifically, (1) Does the prohibition against
“source of income” discrimination require an owner to participate in
the Section 8 program? and (2) Is it a “reasonable accommodation”
for the owner to be required to take this resident’s voucher, when
she has been a tenant for years, and her sons, who are also on the
lease (but reside elsewhere) have always paid the rent?

     • Status: Victory. In April, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of
       the landlord, holding Section 8 vouchers do not fall within the
       protections of the “source of income” provisions of California
       law and that under the facts of this case, the owner was not
       required to take the voucher as an accommodation for the
       tenant’s disability.
www.caanet.org

More Related Content

What's hot

Publishing excel charts and power points presentation
Publishing excel charts and power points presentationPublishing excel charts and power points presentation
Publishing excel charts and power points presentationGisell20
 
Publishing excel charts and power points presentation
Publishing excel charts and power points presentationPublishing excel charts and power points presentation
Publishing excel charts and power points presentationGisell20
 
09 03 17 Web 2.0 Weekly
09 03 17 Web 2.0 Weekly09 03 17 Web 2.0 Weekly
09 03 17 Web 2.0 WeeklyDavid Shore
 
Dolores Torres Low Bar High Bar Client Protection
Dolores Torres Low Bar High Bar Client ProtectionDolores Torres Low Bar High Bar Client Protection
Dolores Torres Low Bar High Bar Client ProtectionMicrocredit Summit Campaign
 
clearchannel 37
clearchannel 37clearchannel 37
clearchannel 37finance31
 

What's hot (15)

Anitgua & Barbuda - Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
Anitgua & Barbuda  - Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]Anitgua & Barbuda  - Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
Anitgua & Barbuda - Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
 
Haiti - Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
Haiti  - Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]Haiti  - Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
Haiti - Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
 
Building Human Capital: The New Face of Poverty
Building Human Capital: The New Face of PovertyBuilding Human Capital: The New Face of Poverty
Building Human Capital: The New Face of Poverty
 
CREATING OUR (ECONOMIC) FUTURE: HIGHER EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CREATING OUR (ECONOMIC) FUTURE: HIGHER EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTCREATING OUR (ECONOMIC) FUTURE: HIGHER EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CREATING OUR (ECONOMIC) FUTURE: HIGHER EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
 
Belize - Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
Belize -  Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal CentreBelize -  Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
Belize - Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
 
Barbados -Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
Barbados -Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal CentreBarbados -Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
Barbados -Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
 
Dominican Republic -Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
Dominican Republic -Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal CentreDominican Republic -Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
Dominican Republic -Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
 
UHS AR
UHS ARUHS AR
UHS AR
 
Guyana -Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
Guyana -Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]Guyana -Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
Guyana -Trade Profile [UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre]
 
The Bahamas - Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
The Bahamas - Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal CentreThe Bahamas - Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
The Bahamas - Trade Profile UWI's Shridath Ramphal Centre
 
Publishing excel charts and power points presentation
Publishing excel charts and power points presentationPublishing excel charts and power points presentation
Publishing excel charts and power points presentation
 
Publishing excel charts and power points presentation
Publishing excel charts and power points presentationPublishing excel charts and power points presentation
Publishing excel charts and power points presentation
 
09 03 17 Web 2.0 Weekly
09 03 17 Web 2.0 Weekly09 03 17 Web 2.0 Weekly
09 03 17 Web 2.0 Weekly
 
Dolores Torres Low Bar High Bar Client Protection
Dolores Torres Low Bar High Bar Client ProtectionDolores Torres Low Bar High Bar Client Protection
Dolores Torres Low Bar High Bar Client Protection
 
clearchannel 37
clearchannel 37clearchannel 37
clearchannel 37
 

Similar to Government Rental Housing Market Outlook

Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012Katie Madanat
 
TAG infrastructure society logistics presentation by Page Siplon
TAG infrastructure society logistics presentation by Page SiplonTAG infrastructure society logistics presentation by Page Siplon
TAG infrastructure society logistics presentation by Page SiplonMelanie Brandt
 
Predicting the Housing Market with Buyer & Seller Psychology (Predictive Anal...
Predicting the Housing Market with Buyer & Seller Psychology (Predictive Anal...Predicting the Housing Market with Buyer & Seller Psychology (Predictive Anal...
Predicting the Housing Market with Buyer & Seller Psychology (Predictive Anal...Altos Research
 
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
2012 q1 google_earnings_slidesDrew Olanoff
 
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
2012 q1 google_earnings_slidestheextraaedge
 
California apartment pres june2013-show
California apartment pres june2013-showCalifornia apartment pres june2013-show
California apartment pres june2013-showRyan Slack
 
MITX's Digital State of the State Report
MITX's Digital State of the State ReportMITX's Digital State of the State Report
MITX's Digital State of the State ReportMITX
 
Slideshare Economic Development Overview 2012
Slideshare Economic Development Overview 2012Slideshare Economic Development Overview 2012
Slideshare Economic Development Overview 2012Nicholas Brake
 
Walkable Neighborhoods Vacancy Rates Excel
Walkable Neighborhoods Vacancy Rates ExcelWalkable Neighborhoods Vacancy Rates Excel
Walkable Neighborhoods Vacancy Rates ExcelKristen Carney
 
Risk Management Association\'s CRE Panel
Risk Management Association\'s CRE PanelRisk Management Association\'s CRE Panel
Risk Management Association\'s CRE Panelcesimpsoniii
 
Utility Data Access-7-27-2012 - IMT for EE Buildings Hub
Utility Data Access-7-27-2012 - IMT for EE Buildings HubUtility Data Access-7-27-2012 - IMT for EE Buildings Hub
Utility Data Access-7-27-2012 - IMT for EE Buildings HubCliff Majersik
 
Decatur, TX: Economic Prospectus
Decatur, TX: Economic ProspectusDecatur, TX: Economic Prospectus
Decatur, TX: Economic ProspectusCivic Analytics LLC
 
Facebook report december 11
Facebook report december 11Facebook report december 11
Facebook report december 11Tcornish
 

Similar to Government Rental Housing Market Outlook (20)

Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
 
Austin information
Austin informationAustin information
Austin information
 
Cliff Brewis Outlook 2012
Cliff Brewis Outlook 2012Cliff Brewis Outlook 2012
Cliff Brewis Outlook 2012
 
TAG infrastructure society logistics presentation by Page Siplon
TAG infrastructure society logistics presentation by Page SiplonTAG infrastructure society logistics presentation by Page Siplon
TAG infrastructure society logistics presentation by Page Siplon
 
Predicting the Housing Market with Buyer & Seller Psychology (Predictive Anal...
Predicting the Housing Market with Buyer & Seller Psychology (Predictive Anal...Predicting the Housing Market with Buyer & Seller Psychology (Predictive Anal...
Predicting the Housing Market with Buyer & Seller Psychology (Predictive Anal...
 
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
 
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
2012 q1 google_earnings_slides
 
California apartment pres june2013-show
California apartment pres june2013-showCalifornia apartment pres june2013-show
California apartment pres june2013-show
 
Intro to Escanaba, MI
Intro to Escanaba, MIIntro to Escanaba, MI
Intro to Escanaba, MI
 
MITX's Digital State of the State Report
MITX's Digital State of the State ReportMITX's Digital State of the State Report
MITX's Digital State of the State Report
 
State of Lending 2012 - Mortgages Overview
State of Lending 2012 - Mortgages OverviewState of Lending 2012 - Mortgages Overview
State of Lending 2012 - Mortgages Overview
 
2011 Benchmark Study
2011 Benchmark Study2011 Benchmark Study
2011 Benchmark Study
 
Slideshare Economic Development Overview 2012
Slideshare Economic Development Overview 2012Slideshare Economic Development Overview 2012
Slideshare Economic Development Overview 2012
 
Walkable Neighborhoods Vacancy Rates Excel
Walkable Neighborhoods Vacancy Rates ExcelWalkable Neighborhoods Vacancy Rates Excel
Walkable Neighborhoods Vacancy Rates Excel
 
Risk Management Association\'s CRE Panel
Risk Management Association\'s CRE PanelRisk Management Association\'s CRE Panel
Risk Management Association\'s CRE Panel
 
Utility Data Access-7-27-2012 - IMT for EE Buildings Hub
Utility Data Access-7-27-2012 - IMT for EE Buildings HubUtility Data Access-7-27-2012 - IMT for EE Buildings Hub
Utility Data Access-7-27-2012 - IMT for EE Buildings Hub
 
Binder1
Binder1Binder1
Binder1
 
Decatur, TX: Economic Prospectus
Decatur, TX: Economic ProspectusDecatur, TX: Economic Prospectus
Decatur, TX: Economic Prospectus
 
Facebook report december 11
Facebook report december 11Facebook report december 11
Facebook report december 11
 
Webster City Iowa Profile
Webster City Iowa ProfileWebster City Iowa Profile
Webster City Iowa Profile
 

Recently uploaded

The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024christinemoorman
 
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts ServiceVip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Serviceankitnayak356677
 
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...Paul Menig
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis UsageNeil Kimberley
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...lizamodels9
 
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...lizamodels9
 
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...anilsa9823
 
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMMonte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMRavindra Nath Shukla
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfpollardmorgan
 
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation SlidesKeppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation SlidesKeppelCorporation
 
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023Neil Kimberley
 
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine ServiceCall Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Serviceritikaroy0888
 
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...lizamodels9
 
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan CommunicationsPharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communicationskarancommunications
 
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...Dave Litwiller
 
Catalogue ONG NUOC PPR DE NHAT .pdf
Catalogue ONG NUOC PPR DE NHAT      .pdfCatalogue ONG NUOC PPR DE NHAT      .pdf
Catalogue ONG NUOC PPR DE NHAT .pdfOrient Homes
 
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc.../:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...lizamodels9
 
Cash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call Girls
Cash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call GirlsCash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call Girls
Cash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call GirlsApsara Of India
 
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Dipal Arora
 
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
 
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts ServiceVip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
 
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
 
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
 
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
 
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMMonte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
 
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation SlidesKeppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
 
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023
 
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine ServiceCall Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
 
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
 
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan CommunicationsPharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
 
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
 
Catalogue ONG NUOC PPR DE NHAT .pdf
Catalogue ONG NUOC PPR DE NHAT      .pdfCatalogue ONG NUOC PPR DE NHAT      .pdf
Catalogue ONG NUOC PPR DE NHAT .pdf
 
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc.../:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
 
Cash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call Girls
Cash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call GirlsCash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call Girls
Cash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call Girls
 
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
 
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
 

Government Rental Housing Market Outlook

  • 2. 2010: Active in the Halls of Government • Santa Cruz rental inspection ordinance • San Jose reduces rent control fees • San Jose protects owners liability • Menlo Park goes smoke‐free (sort of) • Campbell business license tax • Mountain View scales back relocation program • Electoral success Active in the Halls of Government CAA Tri‐County’s efforts saved rental owners – $2.00/unit in San Jose – Burdensome calculations in Campbell – $38/unit in Santa Cruz – Liability for a tenant’s unruly behavior – Posting signs throughout their property
  • 3. Rental Housing Market Outlook 2011 Steve Seligman Vice President & Regional Manager Marcus & Millichap 2011 CAA Tri-County Outlook Steven Seligman – Regional Manager
  • 4. EMPLOYMENT TRENDS U.S. Employment Change by Sector 2010 U.S. Employment Sectors Absolute Change % Change Education & Health Services 422,000 2.2% Prof. & Business Services 366,000 2.2% Leisure & Hospitality 240,000 1.8% Trade, Transport & Utilities 227,000 0.9% Manufacturing 136,000 1.2% Natural Resources & Mining 92,000 13.6% Other Services 65,000 1.2% Total Gain 1,548,000 Information (37,000) -1.3% Financial Activities (72,000) -0.9% Construction (93,000) -1.6% Government (222,000) -1.0% Total Loss (424,000) Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, BLS
  • 5. Employment Absolute Change by Metro Forecast 2011 Top 15 Bottom 15 Markets Abs Chg % Chg Markets Abs Chg % Chg Washington, DC 85,300 2.9% Las Vegas 14,000 1.8% New York City 84,000 2.3% Oakland 13,400 1.4% Dallas-Fort Worth 77,000 2.7% Cincinnati 13,200 1.3% Houston 65,000 2.6% Kansas City 13,000 1.4% Los Angeles 56,000 1.5% Salt Lake City 12,000 2.0% Chicago 52,500 1.3% West Palm Beach 12,000 2.4% Boston 49,000 2.1% Cleveland 11,000 1.1% Atlanta 37,000 1.6% Fort Lauderdale 9,500 1.4% Orange County 36,000 2.6% Sacramento 9,500 1.2% Phoenix 36,000 2.1% Jacksonville 9,000 1.6% Seattle-Tacoma 36,000 2.2% Detroit 8,400 0.5% Austin 28,000 3.6% Tucson 7,800 2.2% Philadelphia 28,000 1.0% Baltimore 7,376 0.6% Minneapolis 25,500 1.5% Louisville 7,000 1.2% Denver 24,000 2.0% Oklahoma City 4,976 0.9% U.S. Total 2,000,000 1.5% U.S. Total 2,000,000 1.5% * San Jose: +21,000 (+2.5%), San Francisco: +20,400 (+2.2%) Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, BLS Employment Trends Bay Area vs. United States 8% 2000-2008 2009 2010* 2011** Year-over-Year Percent Change 4% 0% -4% -8% San Jose San Francisco Oakland United States 2009 : -55,900 -59,600 -60,200 -4,740,000 2010* : +7,000 -11,300 -12,000 +1,124,000 2011** : +21,000 +20,400 +13,400 +2,000,000 * Year-end estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, BLS
  • 6. CAPITAL MARKETS Recent 10-Year Treasury Movement Reflects the Power of Market Sentiment, Expectations and Uncertainty 150K+ Monthly Private Employment Growth 4.00 “Cash for Clunkers” BP Oil Ends Spill Euro Debt 3.75 Crisis Bush-Era Tax 10-Year Treasury Rates Cuts Extended 3.50 Disappointing Private Employment Growth Healthcare Reform Bill 3.25 Signed into Law Retail Sales Exceed Expectations 3.00 1Q10 U.S. GDP QE2 Revised Down Announced 2.75 To 2.7% 2Q10 China 2.50 GDP Slows To 10.3% Lower Jobless Claims 2.25 Se 0 9 Se 9 10 Au 0 M 10 M 0 Ap 0 O 9 D 9 O 0 D 0 Fe 0 N 9 N 0 Ju 0 Ja 9 0 1 l-0 l-0 l-1 1 -1 -0 -1 -1 0 -0 1 -1 1 -0 -1 r- n- g- b- p- p- n- ov ov ar ct ct ay ec ec Ju Ju Ju Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Federal Reserve
  • 7. Core Inflation vs. 10-Year Treasury Core Inflation 10-Year Treasury 20% Avg. Core Inflation Avg. 10-Year Treasury 15% Rate 10% 7.21% 4.41% 5% 0% 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Economy.com, Federal Reserve U.S. Commercial Mortgage Delinquency Rates by Lender Type CMBS (30+ days and REO) Life Companies (60+ days) Fannie Mae (60+ days) Freddie Mac (60+ days) 10% Banks & Thrifts (90+ days) 8% Delinquency Rates 6% 4% 2% 0% 4Q 997 4Q 998 4Q 99 4Q 000 4Q 001 4Q 002 4Q 003 4Q 004 4Q 005 4Q 06 1Q 007 2Q 008 3Q 008 4Q 008 1Q 008 2Q 009 3Q 009 4Q 009 1Q 009 2Q 10 3Q 010 10 19 20 20 20 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4Q Delinquency rates at the end of each period Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Mortgage Bankers Association
  • 8. Total Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Debt Outstanding: $3.2 trillion* State & Local Savings Gov't GSEs and By Lender Types ($Bil): Institutions 3% Ginnie Mae Commercial Banks $1,428.1 Federal 6% 10% Government CMBS, CDO & Other ABS $639.9 2% GSEs and Ginnie Mae $317.2 CMBS, CDO Life Insurance Companies $298.6 and other ABS Savings Institutions $180.1 issues 20% State & Local Governments $89.9 Federal Government $78.8 Others $169.9 Commercial Others Banks 5% 45% Life insurance companies 9% * As of 3Q10 Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Mortgage Bankers Association Sources of Commercial Real Estate Acquisition Financing by Dollar Volume 100% Bank -nat'l, int'l, inv bnk 16% 30% 27% 35% Assumed Debt 75% CMBS 36% 16% 32% Regional/Local Bank Percent 25% 50% 5% 1% Insurance 35% 17% 19% 13% Seller Financed 25% 5% 12% 8% Financial 6% 2% 12% 7% 7% 13% 4% 6% 7% 4% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010* *Through October Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics
  • 9. U.S. Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS) Issuance U.S. CMBS $250 CMBS Issuance (billions) $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Commercial Mortgage Alert PROPERTY FUNDAMENTALS
  • 10. U.S. Apartment Rent and Vacancy Trends Asking Rent Vacancy Rate $1,100 12% Asking Rent per Unit $1,000 9% Vacancy Rate $900 6% $800 3% $700 0% 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10* 11** * Estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis Average Apartment Asking Rent $2,000 2000-2008 2009 2010* 2011** Average Asking Rent per Unit $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Estimate **Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis
  • 11. Average Apartment Vacancy 2000-2008 2009 2010* 2011** 8% 6% Vacancy 4% 2% 0% Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis U.S. Office Rent and Vacancy Trends Asking Rent Vacancy Rate $30 25% Asking Rent per Square Foot $28 20% Vacancy Rate $26 15% $24 10% $22 5% 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10* 11** * Estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis
  • 12. Average Office Asking Rent $80 2000-2008 2009 2010* 2011** Average Asking Rent per Sq. Ft. $60 $40 $20 $0 Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis Average Office Vacancy 2000-2008 2009 2010* 2011** 32% 24% Vacancy 16% 8% 0% Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis
  • 13. U.S. Retail Rent and Vacancy Trends Asking Rent Vacancy Rate $20 12% Monthly Asking Rent per Square Foot $18 10% Vacancy Rate $16 8% $14 6% $12 4% 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10* 11** * Estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Reis Average Retail Asking Rent 2000-2008 2009 2010* 2011** $35 Average Asking Rent per Sq. Ft. $30 $25 $20 $15 Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.
  • 14. Average Retail Vacancy 2000-2008 2009 2010* 2011** 10% 8% 6% Vacancy 4% 2% 0% Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Estimate ** Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc. INVESTMENT TRENDS
  • 15. National Apartment Price / Cap Rate Trends Average Price Cap Rates $125 10% Average Price per Unit (000s) $100 9% Average Cap Rate $75 8% $50 7% $25 6% $0 5% * 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 * Estimate Includes sales $1Million and Greater Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Costar Group, Inc. Apartment Prices by County 2002-2008 2009 2010* $240 Average Price per Unit (000s) $180 $120 $60 $0 Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Preliminary Estimate Includes Sales $500,000 and above Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.
  • 16. Apartment Cap Rates by County 2002-2008 2009 2010* 7% Average Cap Rate 6% 5% 4% 3% Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Preliminary Estimate Includes Sales $500,000 and above Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc. National Office Price and Cap Rates Average Price Cap Rates $250 10% Average Price per Square Foot $200 9% Average Cap Rate $150 8% $100 7% $50 6% $0 5% * 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 * Estimate Includes sales $1Million and Greater Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Costar Group, Inc.
  • 17. Office Prices by County 2002-2008 2009 2010* $400 Average Price per SqFt $300 $200 $100 $0 Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Preliminary Estimate Includes Sales $500,000 and above Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc. Office Cap Rates by County 2002-2008 2009 2010* 10% Average Cap Rate 8% 6% 4% 2% Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Preliminary Estimate Includes Sales $500,000 and above Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.
  • 18. National Retail Price and Cap Rates Average Price Cap Rates $200 10% Average Price per Square Foot $160 9% Average Cap Rate $120 8% $80 7% $40 6% $0 5% * 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 * Estimate Includes sales $1Million and Greater Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Costar Group, Inc. Retail Prices by County 2002-2008 2009 2010* $420 Average Price per SqFt $315 $210 $105 $0 Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Preliminary Estimate Includes Sales $500,000 and above Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc.
  • 19. Retail Cap Rates by County 2002-2008 2009 2010* 10% 8% Average Cap Rate 6% 4% 2% Santa Clara San Mateo Alameda * Preliminary Estimate Includes Sales $500,000 and above Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, CoStar Group, Inc. DISTRESSED ASSETS
  • 20. U.S. Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By Property Type Distressed $ in Bil. # of props Office $48.3 1,876 Apartment $37.9 2,728 Hotel $33.0 1,200 Development Site $29.3 1,318 Retail $24.1 1,959 Industrial $9.1 1,271 Other $4.2 402 Grand Total $186.0 10,754 * As of November 15, 2010 Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics Estimated Distressed Assets Summary Major Western Markets Distressed $ in Mil. # of props Las Vegas $17,954.9 466 Los Angeles $7,749.3 593 Inland Empire $3,236.6 282 San Francisco $3,063.3 244 Orange County $3,034.3 132 Seattle $2,777.0 156 San Diego $2,437.6 172 Oakland $2,378.0 169 San Jose $2,030.6 128 Sacramento $1,976.8 211 Portland $621.6 56 Grand Total $47,260.0 2,609 * As of November 15, 2010 Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics
  • 21. Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By Property Type-San Jose Distressed $ in Mil. # of props Office $1,124.4 38 Hotel $264.6 12 Development Site $211.0 5 Retail $164.5 18 Industrial $133.6 24 Apartment $132.6 31 Grand Total $2,030.6 128 * As of November 15, 2010 Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By Property Type-San Francisco Distressed $ in Mil. # of props Office $1,434.1 47 Apartment $802.5 139 Hotel $366.9 15 Retail $234.7 26 Industrial $158.8 9 Development $40.0 5 Grand Total $3,037.0 241 * As of November 15, 2010 Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics
  • 22. Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By Property Type-Oakland Distressed $ in Mil. # of props Office $643.7 33 Development Site $449.1 24 Apartment $319.6 28 Hotel $285.1 13 Retail $247.6 30 Industrial $143.0 25 Grand Total $2,088.2 153 * As of November 15, 2010 Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics Estimated Distressed Assets Summary By Property Type-Bay Area Distressed $ in Mil. # of props Office $3,202.2 118 Apartment $1,254.7 198 Hotel $916.6 40 Development Site $700.1 34 Retail $646.8 74 Industrial $435.4 58 Grand Total $7,155.8 522 * As of November 15, 2010 Bay Area includes: San Francisco, San Jose, and Oakland Note: Some portfolio deals may not be allocated to a single market Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services, Real Capital Analytics
  • 23. Tri‐County Local Issues Outlook Joshua Howard Executive Director California Apartment Association, Tri‐County Division Outlook 2011 Local government finance • Local government & school district deficits – San Jose $110‐million – Mountain View $2‐million – San Mateo County $84‐million • Fee and tax increases  • School parcel taxes • Government reform
  • 24. Measure A March 8, 2011 Special Election $64,000/unit tax on new multi‐family development Outlook 2011 Local regulations • Soft story retrofits • Smoking regulations continue • Interest on security deposits • Bed bug liability
  • 25. Outlook 2011 Local rental market • From the headlines…. Outlook 2011 Local regulations • Just cause • Late fee regulations • Rental housing database • Longer notice period to terminate tenancy
  • 27. State & National Issues Outlook & Update Thomas Bannon, CEO, California Apartment Association Debra Carlton, Senior Vice President, California Apartment Association CAA State Legislative Affairs 2010 Year In Review & Looking Forward
  • 28. Bills Signed by the Governor Domestic Violence This new law gives a tenant an option to change the locks if he/she has written proof that he/she is the victim of domestic violence. It also provides that a landlord cannot terminate a tenancy or fail to renew a tenancy based solely upon an act or acts of domestic violence against a tenant. The law does, however, specifically give landlords the right to evict the tenant if he/she allows the perpetrator to visit the property or the property owner reasonably believes that the presence of the perpetrator poses a physical threat to other tenants, guests, or to a tenant's right to quiet enjoyment of the property. SB 782 (D-Yee).
  • 29. Carbon Monoxide Detectors This new law requires an owner of a housing unit to install a  carbon monoxide device in each existing dwelling unit that has  a fossil fuel burning heater or appliance, fireplace, or an  attached garage:  For all existing single‐family dwelling units intended for human  occupancy on or before July 1, 2011. For all other existing dwelling units intended for human  occupancy on or before January 1, 2013.  SB 183 (D‐Lowenthal). Foreclosures This new law requires a 90 day disclosure be given by a property owner, informing tenants of their rights when the property owner terminates a tenancy after a foreclosure action. At the same time, this new law allows an unlawful detainer lawsuit to be “masked” by the court permanently if the buildings was involved in a foreclosure and the unlawful detainer action against the tenant is never taken to a final judgment. SB 1149 (D-Corbett).
  • 30. Bills Vetoed by the Governor Rental Property: Animals This bill would have prohibited a landlord from advertising or establishing rental policies that required a tenant or a potential tenant with an animal to have that animal debarked or declawed. AB 2743 (D-Nava).
  • 31. Recycling This bill attempted to mandate commercial recycling on private businesses (rental property) that produced more than four cubic yards of waste a week. It modified existing local permitting requirements and required the Department of Resource Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to provide the Legislature with a report on the progress being made by the state towards a 75 percent diversion goal. AB 737 (D-Chesbro). 2011 Legislative Make-Up
  • 32. State Senate 25 Democrats ‐ 15 Republicans           (5 Moderates) • Balance of Power remained unchanged   • 10 new Senators elected (6 Dem, 4 Rep) • CAAPAC supported 10 of 10 • 1 new Moderate Democrat (Vargas, D‐San  Diego) • 2 seats away from 2/3 majority  State Assembly 52 Democrats ‐ 28 Republicans           (6‐8 Moderates) • 28 new Assemblymembers elected • 17 Democrats  ‐ 11 Republicans  • CAAPAC supported 24 of 28 • Democrats gained 1 seat • 2 seats away from 2/3 majority (3 in 2010)
  • 33. Looking Ahead Anticipated Legislative Activity Funding, Finance & State Budget Publicly Traded Companies – Increase in Property Tax – Definitional Changes to Change in Ownership Rental Property Owner Tracking Payments to Contractors – Withholding Permanent Source of Funding for Affordable Housing – Escrow Fees 1031 Exchanges – Eliminate Tax Benefits
  • 34. Landlord‐Tenant Source of Income – Section 8 Protected Status Just Cause Cap or Eliminate Rental Payment Late Fees Rental Housing Registry 90‐Day Notice for No Cause Evictions No‐Smoking Legislation Environmental AB 32 – Changes to Agency Oversight Mandatory Water Submeters Prohibit RUBS Mandatory Recycling
  • 35. Substandard Housing Violations Bed Bug Legislation Lead Paint Education – Substantial Equivalency  with Federal Law Employer/Employee Eliminate Arbitration Agreements Prohibit Credit Screening of Employees Prohibit Criminal Screening for some Employees
  • 36. Governor’s 3 Point Plan Speak the Truth. No more smoke and mirrors on the budget No New Taxes unless approved by people Return authority to local governments Legal Cases
  • 37. Rental Housing Inspections Rental Housing Owners Association of Southern Alameda County v. City of Hayward Issue: May a City enforce an inspection ordinance that mandates the owner “shall” allow entry into the unit (in contradiction to state law (which strictly limits the right of entry into an occupied unit))? • Status: Victory at Trial Level. City may not enforce requirement. Case is on appeal. CAA Filed Amicus Brief in Appellate Court in Decemberl. Section 8 Sabi v. Sterling Issue: Is an owner required to accept a Section 8 voucher from a disabled tenant? Specifically, (1) Does the prohibition against “source of income” discrimination require an owner to participate in the Section 8 program? and (2) Is it a “reasonable accommodation” for the owner to be required to take this resident’s voucher, when she has been a tenant for years, and her sons, who are also on the lease (but reside elsewhere) have always paid the rent? • Status: Victory. In April, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the landlord, holding Section 8 vouchers do not fall within the protections of the “source of income” provisions of California law and that under the facts of this case, the owner was not required to take the voucher as an accommodation for the tenant’s disability.