web: cohousing.org.uk
email: Jo@Cohousing.org.uk tel: 07572 155173
Community DIY Housing Solutions
1. What’s it about
2. Overview in numbers
3. A few barriers
4. What are the opportunities
HACT /Locality Community Led Housing ‘Learning from
Experience’. York. 17th Feb 2015.
Local solutions, local issues
Established CLH Projects
Intentional
community/l
ow
impact/Eco?
Housing Charities
1,330
Registered Providers
1,087 (stock less 250)
Almshouses
1,669
CLT’s
19
Tennant Management
Org’s 182
Co-operatives
736
Development
Trust’s
29
Self Help Housing
113
Community
Land Trusts
19
Cohousing
18
Gateways
6
Barriers
• You & me
• Monopoly house builders
• Finance not tailored
• Low public awareness
• Poor start up resources- its hard work
• Improve evidence base
Opportunities
• The offer is extensive & unique to each area
• Easier to do in the North
• Can be a viable community enterprise
• Local authority support
• Off shelf models – replicate
• Localism Act & NPPF
• Stand up & campaign

Jo Gooding Cohousing

  • 1.
    web: cohousing.org.uk email: Jo@Cohousing.org.uktel: 07572 155173 Community DIY Housing Solutions 1. What’s it about 2. Overview in numbers 3. A few barriers 4. What are the opportunities HACT /Locality Community Led Housing ‘Learning from Experience’. York. 17th Feb 2015.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Established CLH Projects Intentional community/l ow impact/Eco? HousingCharities 1,330 Registered Providers 1,087 (stock less 250) Almshouses 1,669 CLT’s 19 Tennant Management Org’s 182 Co-operatives 736 Development Trust’s 29 Self Help Housing 113 Community Land Trusts 19 Cohousing 18 Gateways 6
  • 4.
    Barriers • You &me • Monopoly house builders • Finance not tailored • Low public awareness • Poor start up resources- its hard work • Improve evidence base
  • 5.
    Opportunities • The offeris extensive & unique to each area • Easier to do in the North • Can be a viable community enterprise • Local authority support • Off shelf models – replicate • Localism Act & NPPF • Stand up & campaign

Editor's Notes

  • #4 Underdeveloped, small – unknown? Less than 1% housing stock? Overlap in big 3 sources –run through others What is known about the variety and scale of the projects listed here? Objectives/purpose, viability, practices (scope of services), shared space, needs as a sector? Argue this is the answer to scaling out Also not properly understood are the cohort of projects in development: there rationale at at what stages - for example 170 CLT’s, 65 cohousing projects, 30 development