1. Japan Field Study Workshop
Outcomes
Keiko Tamura, Niigata University
Munenari Inoguchi, Niigata University
Haruo Hayashi, Kyoto University
*Slides 35-41 are prohibited to reprint on the request of Otsuchi Town & Iwate Prefecture
*Do not use beyond this project
2. Ｃ
Y0 Y1 Y2
2012
Bloomfield
Meeting
Theme：Sustainable Disaster Recovery:
Addressing Risks and Uncertainty→3Field Trip
（Constructing the Agenda of 3rd ICUDR ）
Japan
US
Taiwan
October
2012 2013 2014
3rd ICUDR
International Conference
on Urban Disaster Reduction
EERI
Earthquake Engineering
Research Institute
March 13-15
July 12
October
CGP Project
(The Japan Foundation Center for Global
Partnership）
ISSS
Institute of
Social Safety Science
||
Annual Natural
Hazards Research and
Applications Workshop
Japan
US
Taiwan
2005
2014
2007
Natural Hazards
Center
Researchers & Practitioners Young ResearchersKeywords:
Nov30th⇔Des 1st
End of Aug: plan for
next year budget
3. Meeting #1 - Japan Schedule (March 13-15)
Day0: March 12 Moving Day
1)1900- Having Meeting with Dinner in Morioka
Day1: March 13 ‘Field Trip & Interview in the impacted area’
1) Field Trip to the Impacted Area
2) Some Interview opportunity
Day2: March 14 ' Open Forum in Iwate University'
1) 1000-1200 Free (Optional Short trip in Morioka)
2) 1330-1700 Open Forum in Iwate University
3) 1800-2000 Welcome party
Day3: March 15‘ Meeting & Closed Forum in Morioka’
1) 0930-1200 US, Taiwan, Japan members have meeting at Conference Room
in Hotel Metropolitan Morioka
2) 1330-1630 Closed Forum for researchers and administrative officers at Iwate
Prefectural government office
3) 1700-2000 US, Taiwan, Japan members have meeting at Conference Room
in Hotel Metropolitan Morioka
4. Participants for Meeting #1 - Japan
○US Delegation
1. Ken Topping Lecturer/Researcher, Cal Poly University Dept of City and Regional Planning
2. Laurie Johnson Principal, ,Laurie Johnson Consulting & Research
3. Rick Wilson Engineering Geologist, California Geological Survey
4. Marjorie Greene Special Projects Manager , Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
5. Rob Olshansky Professor, University of Illinois
6. Richard Eisner Fellow of the American Institute of Architects
○Taiwan Delegation
1. CHEN, Liang-Chun 陳亮全 Director, National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction
2. WU, Jie-Ying 吳杰穎 Professor , Ming-Chuan University
3. SHAO, Pei-Chun 邵珮君 Professor ,Chang Jung Christian University
4. LU, Jing-Chein 盧鏡臣 Assistant Professor, Central Policy University
5. CHEN, Haili 陳海立 Assistant Professor, National Taipei University
6. YANG, Hui-Hsuan 楊惠萱 Assistant Research Fellow,
National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction
7. DENG, Chuan-Chung 鄧傳忠 National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction
〇Japan Delegation
1.Haruo Hayashi 林 春男 Professor , Prevention Research Institute,, Kyoto University
2.Norio Maki 牧 紀男 Associate Professor , Prevention Research Institute,, Kyoto University
3.Shigeo Tatsuki 立木 茂雄 Professor , Faculty of Social Studies, Doshisha University
4. Keiko Tamura 田村 圭子 Professor , Risk Management Office , Niigata University
5. Munenari Inoguchi 井ノ口 宗成 Assistant Professor,
Research Institute for Natural Hazards & Disaster Recovery, Niigata University
5. Day0: March 12 Moving Day
Having Meeting with Dinner in Morioka
Local food “Wanko-zen”
Guest Speaker; Dr Akitomi
Iwate Medical Univ
6. Start: Morioka
1. Rikuzen-takata
3. Otsuchi
6. Taro
2. Ofunato
100miles
7. Greenpia Miyako
60 miles
Local Bus Agency
Day1: March 13 ‘Field Trip & Interview in the impacted area’
7. Facility for Memorial
Roadside Station“Takata-Matsubara”
Local
Volunteer
1. RIKUZEN-TAKATA（陸前高
田）
Day1: March 13 ‘Field Trip & Interview in the impacted area’
8. The "miracle pine tree" :A lone pine tree that
survived the March 2011 tsunami here but died later,
sparking a project to preserve it, was lit up in a test
run on June 28, following the completion of
restoration work earlier in the month.
Before 2011 3.11
1. RIKUZEN-TAKATA（陸前高
田）
15. CGP Open Forum on March 14th, 2013
国際交流基金日米センタープロジェクト日本会議・公開フォーラムの
開催
Research Center for Regional Disaster Management, Iwate University
Day2: March 14 Open Forum in Iwate University'
16. Part I: Input from the Impacted Area
(Moderator: Shigeki Sakai, Director, Research Center for Regional
Disaster Management, Iwate University)
1. Development of New Inspection Method for Decrepit / Devastated Road Bridges
大西弘志（岩手大学）Hiroshi Onishi (Iwate University)
2. Tsunami Evacuation of Fishermen in Iwate Coastal Area
松林由里子（岩手大学）Yuriko Matsubayashi (Iwate University)
3. Analysis Report of the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake and
Tsunami -Spatial Gap of the Tsunami Damage for Houses-
柳川竜一（岩手大学）Ryoichi Yanagawa (Iwate University)
4. The Nurturing and Succession of Disaster Culture – Regional Schools as a Core of
Disaster Management, Focusing on Two Essay Guidance for Collections of Students’
Tsunami Experience Essays at Taro, Iwate
山崎友子（岩手大学）Tomoko Yamazaki (Iwate University)
17. Part II: Input from the Taiwan Experiences
(Moderator: Liang-Chun Chen, Director, National Science and
Technology Center for Disaster Reduction)
1. Sustainable Disaster Recovery: Addressing Risks and Uncertainaty – Taiwan
Experiences
陳亮全 Liang-Chun Chen
2. Disaster Recovery and Collective Relocation of Typhoon Morakot
陳海立 Haili Chen (National Taipei University)
3. Lessons of Community Reconstruction from Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake
邵珮君 Pei-Chun Shao (Chang Jung Christian University)
18. Part III: Input from the Japan Experiences
(Moderator: Keiko Tamura, Professor, Research Institute for
Natural Hazard and Disaster Recovery, Niigata University)
1. Holistic Approach for the Process of Life Recovery Based on the System of
Disaster Victims’ Master Database
田村圭子 Keiko Tamura
2. Micro Media Service for Building Up the Personal Resilience
井ノ口宗成（新潟大学） Munenari Inoguchi (Niigata University)
3. Two Styles of Long-term Recovery –Kobe and Tohoku-
林 春男（京都大学） Haruo Hayashi (Kyoto University)
19. Part IV: Input from the U. S. Experiences
(Moderator: Kenneth C. Topping, Lecturer, City & Regional
Planning Department, California Polytechnic State University)
1. Viewing the Tohoku Disaster from across the Pacific Ocean
Kenneth C. Topping
2. Recovery Learning and Collaboration
Marjorie Greene (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute)
3. U. S. Tsunami Preparedness and Mitigation Program: Applying Lessons
Learned from Tohoku-oki Tsunami
Rick Wilson (Department of Conservation, State of California)
4. Building Response Capacity for Large Disaster
Richard Eisner (American Institute of Architecture)
5. Katrina as the Focusing Event for U. S. Disaster Policy
Laurie Johnson (Laurie Johnson Consulting & Research)
6. Learning about Recovery around the World
Rob Olshansky (University of Illinois)
21. Day3: March 15 US, Taiwan, Japan members have meeting
3rd ICUDR should be・・・
• Break the Stovepipes
• Towards the integrated science for disaster reduction
• Towards the integrated research for disaster reduction
• Building bridges over
• Connecting past and future
• Connecting people across the disciplines
• Connecting people across international boundaries
• Learning from each other country
• Connecting each element of Disaster cycle
• Reducing vulnerability
• From mitigation model to resilience model
• Linking mitigation, resilience and Adaptation
• Connecting local, regional ,national and governments
• How to community deal with recovery issues
Human
人間
Space
空間
Time
時間
Resilience
SOCIAL VULNERABILITY
Exposure Adaptation
Hazard Mitigation
22. Day3: March 15 Closed Forum for researchers and
administrative officers at Prefectural government office
東日本大震災
岩手県の対応と教訓
岩手県総務部総合防災室
主任防災指導員 越野修三
From
DISASTER MANAGEMENT Division
From
DISASTER RECOVERY Division
23. Situation of the damages by the tsunami
23
From DISASTER MANAGEMENT Division
24. Item
1995 Great
Hanshin-Awaji
2011 Great East Japan
All Japan (Iwate)
Loss of life (as of January 24, 2012)
Dead 6,432 15,844 4,667
Missing 3 3,394 1,368
Total 6,435 19,238 6,035
Building damage (as of January 24, 2012)
Complete and
partial collapse
249,180 368,862 24,736
Shelter situation (at peak time)
Number of Shelters 399
Number of Refugees About 320,000 About 550,000 54,429
Situation of essential utilities damage (at peak time)
Electric outage About 2,600,000 units About 4,400,000 units About 760,000 units
Gas shortage About 860,000 units About 430,000 units About 9,400 units
Water outage About 1,300,000 Units At least 1,800,000 Units About 180,000 units
Disconnection of
land-line phones
Over 300,000 lines About 900,000 lines About 66,100 lines
Summary of the Damage
(Comparison with the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake)
24
From DISASTER MANAGEMENT Division
25. 【Search & Rescue】
1. After Tsunami there were so many isolated area, which
should be searched and rescued
2. The necessity of rescue using helicopters increased;
however, there were not enough helicopters to
response their needs
3. Debris caused by Tsunami made search & rescue
extremely difficult
4. There were no management system to handle dead
bodies
Lessons Learned
【People with Specials Needs】
4. Many elderlies were victimized
5.Many Supporters were victimized when they tried to
support people with special needs to be evacuated
Distribution map based on
residence of the deaths and missing
persons near Otsuchi bay
Age of dead and
missing persons
Under 11
Under 21
Under 31
Under 41
Under 51
Under 61
Under 71
Under 81
Under 91
Under 101
Over 101
34
【Shelter Management】
6. Relief supplies could not reach the victims in first 3 days.
7. There were not enough resources to manage shelters
because city & town officials were also victimized
【Relief Supplies】
8. National government’s lack of control over relief supplies
management because of sectionalism
9. a fuel shortage were serious problems
From DISASTER MANAGEMENT Division
33. Disaster Management
• What kind of relation or coordination had been made
between national government’s and prefecutal levels at the
time of response phase? What should they be?
Disaster Recovery
• In Tsunami impacted area many victims are supposed to move
away from their original location. What are those people’s
situation?
• The Victims claims that the recovery process was slow. Was it
slow or should it be slow?
Discussion has been made・・・
35. Residents：15,276
( Census in 2010: before Tsunami)
Out of Residential Area (pink color)
Kamaishi City
Tono City
Miyako City
Yamada Town
Otsuchi
36. Residents in Tsunami Impacted Area：10,775
（70.5% of residents）
4,396 households were inundated
Tsunami Impacted Area
(Red color)
Kamaishi City
Tono City
Miyako City
Yamada Town
Otsuchi
37. Otsuchi Station
Old City Hall
Kirikiri Station
Red: Tsunami Impacted Area
Blue：Residents
★（Yellow Star） Landmarks
39. Current Residential Address
(Around Otsuchi Station and City Hall)
• 4,266 Residents lived before Tsunami
• As to April 26th, 2013
– Managed Current Address 3,524 persons
• People still living at the same place: 76
• People living at other place than before: 3,448 (98%)
→ In Iwate, In Japan, Overseas…
– NOT Managed Current Address 742 persons
42. Ken Topping visited Morioka Kindergarten on March 14th,
which was established by his Grandfather
43. Earthquake Risks in Japan for the Next 30 years
60%
M8.1
〜8.540%
M7.9
〜8.3
50%
〜2%
M7.8
〜8.2
M8.1
〜8.3
〜10% M8.0
99%
M7.5
〜8.0
90%
M7.7
〜8.0
〜1% M7.9
60% M8.4
70% M8.1
87% M7.9
Tokyo
Metropolitan
70% M7.3
As of 1.1.2010
