Presentation from session A4 on Monday 18th June at IWMW12:
#A4: The Xcri-cap Files
Parallel session by Rob Englebright and Claire Gibbons on Monday 18th June from 11:00-12:30
See the abstract and Rob Englebright's and Claire Gibbons' biographical details.
3. Rob Englebright
Programme manager JISC eLearning-
r.englebright@jisc.ac.uk
Claire
Senior Web and Marketing
Manager
c.s.gibbons1@bradford.ac.uk
4. Why?
• OLTF @DaveOwhite:
• "Information about online programmes is lacking and often
difficult to find, both for distance courses and for the
online learning elements in blended programmes. This has a
significant impact on student choice, domestically and
internationally. Only with better information can
prospective students find what they want, judge value for
money and make more accurate decisions about where and how to
study. Better information will give institutions
competitive edge" Report to HEFCE by the Online Learning Task
Force January 2011.
5. What?
• Jan 2012 - March 2013
• Review internal course data handling
processes and revise
• create an xcri-cap1.2 feed
• JISC Coursedata Programme: bit.ly/coursedata
it’s like some
kind of alien cube?
6. Who?
Arts University College at Bournemouth London Metropolitan University University of Bedfordshire
Aston University London School of Economics University of Birmingham
Bath Spa University Loughborough College University of Bolton
Birkbeck, University of London Loughborough University University of Cambridge
Bishop Burton College Middlesex University University of East London
Blackpool & The Fylde College Myerscough College University of Essex
Bournemouth and Poole College New College Durham University of Exeter
Bradford College North Lindsey College University of Greenwich
Brunel University Oxford Brookes University University of Hertfordshire
Burton and South Derbyshire College Plymouth College of Art University of Hull
City College Norwich Royal Holloway University of London University of Kent
City of Bristol College St Georges University of London University of Leicester
Cornwall College St Mary's University College University of Lincoln
Coventry University Staffordshire University University of Nottingham
Cranfield University Teesside University University of Oxford
Edge Hill University The Arts University College at Bournemouth University of Salford
Grimsby Institute for HE & FE The Courtauld Institute of Art University of Sheffield
Harper Adams University College University of Central Lancashire Univeristy of Sussex
Lancaster University University College Falmouth University of Sunderland
Leeds Metropolitan University University of the West of England
Leeds Trinity University College University of West London
Wigan & Leigh College
Leicester College
Myerscough?
7. it’s like
some crazy
Where? alien
invasion map.
10. What does XCRI-CAP
look like?
• http://www.xcri.org/wiki/index.php/
XCRI_CAP_1.2 becoming BS8581-
conformant profile of BS EN 15982 (MLO)
• http://www.xcri.org/wiki/index.php/
XCRI_Feeds
• http://www.xcri.co.uk/data-definitions-and-
vocabulary-framework.html
11. cool URIs
• Requirement for feeds to have a cool URI to
help aggregation.
• http://lncn.eu/toolkit
12. Licence
• From the Data definitions doc.
• “It is a principle of XCRI-CAP feeds produced under the Course Data
Programme that the data should be freely available to any aggregator or
other user, organisation or individual to copy, re-distribute, share, adapt
and exploit commercially or otherwise.
This document recommends that all such feeds are explicitly licensed
under an Open Government Licence (OGL).
This licence grants to the user a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, non-
exclusive licence to use the information, while providing for
acknowledgement of the source of the information. This licence contains
no warranty or liability on the provider, and importantly also includes
specific non-endorsement clauses. “
14. Exercise #1
• In table groups - introduce yourself - look at the Self
Assessment Framework, and identify your top 3 issues, 3
benefits that might drive implementation:
• http://xcrisaf.igsl.co.uk/saf
• Institutional Strategic planning
• Planning the output
• Management implementation
• Technical implementation
The truth is out there.\nApologies to folk who saw these slides at DEV8eD,\nOur abstract says:\n"The truth is out there... but where?\nThe 2011 Online Learning Task Force report identified that online, distance, CPD and postgrad learning opportunities are difficult to find.\nThe JISC #coursedata programme is supporting 63 institutions to review and refine their course information handling processes. As an outward manifestation of this increased agility the projects will produce an xcri-cap feed for these course types.\nThe #coursedata-tech part of the programme has commissioned a validator and aggregator and will be creating some demonstration applications that use the data.\nThis session will briefly cover the programme, the tools and their possible uses.”\nIf this isn't the session you signed up for time to RUNAROUND\n
\n
Rob Englebright\nProgramme Manager with JISC Elearning team.\nI'm looking after part of the #coursedata programme, \nworking with BSI on standardisation of xcri-cap, \nLooking after the tail end of the DVLE programme,\nThe JISC Online conference - in November\n\nClaire Gibbons\nwho actually does stuff\n
David O White\n\nThe Online Learning Task Force (OLTF) published its final report 'Collaborate to compete: Seizing the opportunity of online learning for UK higher education' in January 2011.\n\nIt makes six recommendations to institutions and the wider HE sector. including:\n\nusing online learning to enhance student choice\ndeveloping and exploiting open educational resources.\n\n\n
The JISC #coursedata programme..\nstage 1 ran from September- Dec 2011 -and provided small amount of funding to 93 institutions to undertake self review and develop a plan to revise internal systems and implement xcri-cap\nStage 2 runs from Jan 2012 - March 2013\nOutworking of the plans from stage 1, -Review internal course data handling processes and revise\ncreate an xcri-cap1.2 feed\nJISC Coursedata Programme: bit.ly/coursedata.\n
STAGE 2\n63 institutions, \n16 FE (400 FTES)\nThe programme requires xcri-cap feed is produced for online, distance, CPD, some projects are doing ALL courses.\n
England (Hefce capital fund)\n\n
\nThis is “xcri map”, not to be confused with xcri cap\nA brief history of XCRI-CAP\nXCRI came out of some discussions including Mark Stubbs at MMU, thinking there had to be a better way of describing and defining course data.\nThe original idea was XCRI.. sometimes called BIG XCRI..\n.. sometimes not referred to at all for fear of confusing folk..\nXCRI proved too complex and unwieldy to contain all the data\n\nso xcri-cap was born..\n\n\n\n
xcri-cap is an xml representation of course advertising information\n5.2 Core Elements\n5.2.1 the <catalog> element\n5.2.2 the <provider> element\n5.2.3 the <course> element\n5.2.4 the <presentation> element\n\n5.3 Common Elements\n5.3.1 the <contributor> element\n5.3.2 the <description> element\n5.3.3 the <identifier> element\n5.3.4 the <title> element\n5.3.5 the <subject> element\n5.3.6 the <type> element\n5.3.7 the <url> element\n5.3.8 the <image> element\n\n5.4 Common Descriptive Elements\n5.4.1 the <abstract> element\n5.4.2 the <applicationProcedure> element\n5.4.3 the <assessment> element\n5.4.4 the <learningOutcome> element\n5.4.5 the <objective> element\n5.4.6 the <prerequisite> element\n5.4.7 the <regulations> element\n\n5.5 Elements used in the provider element\n5.5.1 the <location> element\n\n5.6 Elements used in the course element\n5.6.1 the <qualification> element\n5.6.2 the <credit> element\n\n5.7 Elements used in the qualification element\n5.7.1 the <abbr> element abbreviated form of the title of the qualification\n5.7.2 the <educationLevel> element\n5.7.3 the <awardedBy> element\n5.7.4 the <accreditedBy> element\n\n5.8 Elements used in the presentation element\n5.8.1 the <start> element\n5.8.2 the <end> element\n5.8.3 the <duration> element\n5.8.4 the <applyFrom> element\n5.8.5 the <applyUntil> element\n5.8.6 the <applyTo> element\n5.8.7 the <engagement> element\n5.8.8 the <studyMode> element\n5.8.9 the <attendanceMode> element\n5.8.10 the <attendancePattern> element\n5.8.11 the <languageOfInstruction> element\n5.8.12 the <languageOfAssessment> element\n5.8.13 the <places> element\n5.8.14 the <cost> element\n5.8.15 the <age> element\n5.8.16 the <venue> element\n\n\n
xcri-cap-\nXCRI-CAP stands for "exchanging course related information course advertising profile", forged in the frontal lobes of some of the finest brains in Britain... Mark Stubbs, and Scott Wilson\n\nhttp://www.xcri.org/wiki/index.php/XCRI_CAP_1.2 becoming BS8581- conformant profile of BS EN 15982 (MLO)\n\nhttp://www.xcri.org/wiki/index.php/XCRI_Feeds\n\nhttp://www.xcri.co.uk/data-definitions-and-vocabulary-framework.html\n\n\n\n\n
\n
Unless there is a compelling reasons not to, which is agreed with the JISC Programme manager, the XCRI-CAP feed should include an open licence outlining the permitted use of the file, it is suggested that the OGL is used.\n\nLicensing of XCRI-CAP feeds\n1It is a principle of XCRI-CAP feeds produced under the Course Data Programme that the data should be freely available to any aggregator or other user, organisation or individual to copy, re-distribute, share, adapt and exploit commercially or otherwise. This document recommends that all such feeds are explicitly licensed under an Open Government Licence (OGL). This licence grants to the user a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, non-exclusive licence to use the information, while providing for acknowledgement of the source of the information. This licence contains no warranty or liability on the provider, and importantly also includes specific non-endorsement clauses. The OGL licence is similar to a Creative Commons licence, but attribution is only needed if the copyright holder makes it a requirement. Where multiple providers are involved, an optional generic statement that 'public sector information' is included, rather than a specific attribution, can be used.\n2It is important that data publishers are familiar with the terms of the OGL for the avoidance of doubt about how the information may be used and the constraints placed on any user. The JISC sponsored document &#x201C;Licensing Open data: A Practical Guide&#x201D; June 2011 provides a sound overview of the licence landscape.\n3The following information about the licence attached to the data should be included in the description element of the catalog element:\nName of the licence, for example &#x2018;Open Government Licence (OGL)&#x2019;\nVersion number of the licence\nOwner of the licence, for example &#x2018;University of Test&#x2019;\nhttp://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/\n http://discovery.ac.uk/files/pdf/Licensing_Open_Data_A_Practical_Guide.pdf \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
A validator..\nit checks your feeds are well formed and valid.\n\nif you haven&#x2019;t got an xcri-cap file, here&#x2019;s one I made earlier...wychwolf.com/moodle/wychwolf-moodle.xml\n
An aggregator that manages feeds, the SOLR index can be interrogated by an API, and is has SDKs built for PHP Java and such like. \n