Experience in Treatment for
Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Dao Xuan Co, MD,PHD
ICU, Bach Mai hospital
Hanoi, Vietnam
Background
 Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common cause
for hospitalization, with severe cases
requiring ICU level monitoring and resulting in
a substantial mortality.
 Acute necrotizing pancreatitis accounts for
10-15% of all cases of AP. It is frequently
accompanied by a SIRS and MOFS and
occasion ally by infected necrosis.
Background
 The mainstay of treatment of patients with
acute necrotizing pancreatitis traditionally has
been surgical débridement (VIETNAM).
 Mortality among patients undergoing early
surgery is high, varying between 21% and
42% (VN 52 %).
Am J Respir Crit Care Med,
http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm.164.1.2008026
Pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis
Background
 Intra-abdominal pressures (IAP) has been studied by many
researchers and physicians and noted to have correlation with
acute pancreatitis.
 Studies have shown a direct correlation between elevated IAP
and higher rates of complications, mortality, duration of
treatment and cost of hospital stay in acute pancreatitis.
 Early CVVH can improve vascular permeability through
elimination of cytokines such as TNF-α, and thereby decrease
interstitial edema to lower IAP and should be applied in the
early stages of ACS.
 Intensivist-performed bedside drainage of free intraperitoneal
fluid or blood (percutaneous catheter decompression [PCD])
has been advocated as a less-invasive alternative to open
abdominal decompression (OAD for………… ).
Subjects and Methods
 Retrospective study conducted in 85 severe acute
pancreatitis patients in ICU of Bach Mai Hospital.
(APACHE II score is 13±3.85):
 A total of 85 SAP patients were treated with conventional
protocol combinned with CVVH and drainged necrosis
fluid under ECHO or CT guide:
 CVVH was started 35 ± 25.5 hours after onset of the
disease, AN69 hemofilter was changed every 12-24
hours. The ultrafiltration rate during HVHF was 45ml /kg,
blood flow rate was 200-250 ml/min and the substitute
fluid was infused with 50% pre-dilution. Low molecular
weight heparin was used for anticoagulation.
RESULT
index  SD (n = 85) Min Max
Age 43,5  16,5 23 75
SIRS 2,8  0,8 2 4
Ranson 6,5  2,5 3 11
APACHEII 13±3.85 8 28
Imrie 4,5  2,8 3 8
CTSI 7,5  3,7 7 11
SOFA 8,2  4,5 5 20
Number of failed organ 2,8  2,5 1 6
IAP(cmH2O) 23,2  4,8 17 38
X
Nguyễn Quang Hải, De Waele
Clinical parameters of patients
IAP Classifications based on World Society
of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Grade (n) Rate %
I 15 17,6
II 30 35,3
III 30 35,3
IV 10 11,8
Total 85 100
Amount of fluid tranfusion for patient during first 24 hour
(CVP 12-16 cm H2O and/ urine amount ≥ 0,5ml/kg/h)
Amount of fluid
IAP grade
X  SD (ml)
I (16 – 20 cm H2O)
n = 15
3.125 ± 756
II (21 – 27 cm H2O)
n = 30
3.950 ± 785
III (28 -34 cm H2O)
n = 30
5.450 ± 2.475
IV (> 35 cm H2O)
n = 10
5.850 ± 2.355
Balogh (2003), Malbrain (2005), Paugherty (2007), Vidal (2008)
Ventilation
Mode
IAP grade
Noninvasive
(n, %)
Invasive
(n, %) (%)
I
(n=15)
1
6,6
0
0
6,6
II
(n=30)
4
13,3
1
3,3
16,6
III
(n=30)
10
33,3
5
16,6
50
IV
(n=10)
1
10,0
9
90,0
100
Bùi Văn Khích (71%)
Time of total enteral nutrition related to IAP Grade
IAP Grade
Time of total enteral
nutrition X  SD (hour)
I (n=15) 30,6 ± 16,4
II (n=30) 36,6 ± 17,8
III (n=30) 52,5 ± 15,7
IV (n=10) 65,5 ± 24,5
Bùi Văn Khích 2004 (5-10 ngày)
CVVH
IAP Grade
Duration of CVVH
(X  SD) (hour)
Number of
membrane filter
(X  SD)
I (n=15) 28 ± 14,5 1,5 ± 0,5
II (n=30) 45 ± 18,6 2,4 ± 1,2
III (n=30) 45 ± 28,5 3,5 ± 1,4
IV (n=10) 96 ± 38,5 5,5 ± 2,5
Vũ Đức Định, De Waele, Nguyễn Gia Bình
Characteristics of CVVH related to IAP Grade
Characteristics of free fluid drained
IAP Grade
Volume of
fluid drained
per catheter
(X  SD) (ml)
Positive fluid
culture (n, %)
Catheterization
( X SD) (days)
I
(n=5)
653±352
2
02 Ecoli
3,5 ± 2,3
II
(n=20)
865±656
5
3 Ecoli
2 Enterococcus
5,2 ± 3,5
III
(n=30)
2.553±755
5
3 Ecoli
2 Enterococcus
10,5 ± 3,8
IV
(n=10)
2.853±456
4
3 Ecoli
1 Enterococcus
12,3 ± 8,5
overoll 1.564±583
19
(32,8)
8,2 ± 6,7
IAP values in survived vs non-survived
patients
SOFA scores in survived vs non-survived
patients
Correlection between IAP and SOFA score
y = 1,04x + 13,58 ; r = 0,81 ; p = 0,001
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 5 10 15 20
SOFA
ALOB(cmH2O)
Paivi Keskinen
IAP
Survived vs non-survived patients between WSACS
grading classifications
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Grade I (n=15) Grade II (n=30) Grade III (n=30) Grade IV (n=10)
100 100
90
50
0 0
10
50
%
Surived Non- suriverd
Mortality rate
Mortality rate
Number of organ failure
(n), (%)
1 organ failure (n =41 ) 0
2 organ failure (n = 23) 1(4,3%)
3 - 4 organ failure (n = 17) 2 (11,8%)
5 - 6 organ failure (n = 8) 4(62,5%)
Overall mortality
(n = 85)
8 (14,5%)
Paivi Keskinen, De Waele, Sun ZX, Nguyễn Quang Hải
Clinical case
32cmH2O
Conclutions
 Combine CVVH + tapping and draining the
fluid collection: Reduce significant mortality.
 IAP values when recorded throughout
hospitalization during the first 7 days
correlate with SOFA scores and mortality
rates and can be used as a marker to
guideline for treament, monitor the course of
illness in acute pancreatitis.
Thank you !

điều trị viêm tụy cấp

  • 1.
    Experience in Treatmentfor Severe Acute Pancreatitis Dao Xuan Co, MD,PHD ICU, Bach Mai hospital Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 2.
    Background  Acute pancreatitis(AP) is a common cause for hospitalization, with severe cases requiring ICU level monitoring and resulting in a substantial mortality.  Acute necrotizing pancreatitis accounts for 10-15% of all cases of AP. It is frequently accompanied by a SIRS and MOFS and occasion ally by infected necrosis.
  • 3.
    Background  The mainstayof treatment of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis traditionally has been surgical débridement (VIETNAM).  Mortality among patients undergoing early surgery is high, varying between 21% and 42% (VN 52 %).
  • 4.
    Am J RespirCrit Care Med, http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm.164.1.2008026 Pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis
  • 5.
    Background  Intra-abdominal pressures(IAP) has been studied by many researchers and physicians and noted to have correlation with acute pancreatitis.  Studies have shown a direct correlation between elevated IAP and higher rates of complications, mortality, duration of treatment and cost of hospital stay in acute pancreatitis.  Early CVVH can improve vascular permeability through elimination of cytokines such as TNF-α, and thereby decrease interstitial edema to lower IAP and should be applied in the early stages of ACS.  Intensivist-performed bedside drainage of free intraperitoneal fluid or blood (percutaneous catheter decompression [PCD]) has been advocated as a less-invasive alternative to open abdominal decompression (OAD for………… ).
  • 6.
    Subjects and Methods Retrospective study conducted in 85 severe acute pancreatitis patients in ICU of Bach Mai Hospital. (APACHE II score is 13±3.85):  A total of 85 SAP patients were treated with conventional protocol combinned with CVVH and drainged necrosis fluid under ECHO or CT guide:  CVVH was started 35 ± 25.5 hours after onset of the disease, AN69 hemofilter was changed every 12-24 hours. The ultrafiltration rate during HVHF was 45ml /kg, blood flow rate was 200-250 ml/min and the substitute fluid was infused with 50% pre-dilution. Low molecular weight heparin was used for anticoagulation.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    index  SD(n = 85) Min Max Age 43,5  16,5 23 75 SIRS 2,8  0,8 2 4 Ranson 6,5  2,5 3 11 APACHEII 13±3.85 8 28 Imrie 4,5  2,8 3 8 CTSI 7,5  3,7 7 11 SOFA 8,2  4,5 5 20 Number of failed organ 2,8  2,5 1 6 IAP(cmH2O) 23,2  4,8 17 38 X Nguyễn Quang Hải, De Waele Clinical parameters of patients
  • 9.
    IAP Classifications basedon World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Grade (n) Rate % I 15 17,6 II 30 35,3 III 30 35,3 IV 10 11,8 Total 85 100
  • 10.
    Amount of fluidtranfusion for patient during first 24 hour (CVP 12-16 cm H2O and/ urine amount ≥ 0,5ml/kg/h) Amount of fluid IAP grade X  SD (ml) I (16 – 20 cm H2O) n = 15 3.125 ± 756 II (21 – 27 cm H2O) n = 30 3.950 ± 785 III (28 -34 cm H2O) n = 30 5.450 ± 2.475 IV (> 35 cm H2O) n = 10 5.850 ± 2.355 Balogh (2003), Malbrain (2005), Paugherty (2007), Vidal (2008)
  • 11.
    Ventilation Mode IAP grade Noninvasive (n, %) Invasive (n,%) (%) I (n=15) 1 6,6 0 0 6,6 II (n=30) 4 13,3 1 3,3 16,6 III (n=30) 10 33,3 5 16,6 50 IV (n=10) 1 10,0 9 90,0 100 Bùi Văn Khích (71%)
  • 12.
    Time of totalenteral nutrition related to IAP Grade IAP Grade Time of total enteral nutrition X  SD (hour) I (n=15) 30,6 ± 16,4 II (n=30) 36,6 ± 17,8 III (n=30) 52,5 ± 15,7 IV (n=10) 65,5 ± 24,5 Bùi Văn Khích 2004 (5-10 ngày)
  • 13.
    CVVH IAP Grade Duration ofCVVH (X  SD) (hour) Number of membrane filter (X  SD) I (n=15) 28 ± 14,5 1,5 ± 0,5 II (n=30) 45 ± 18,6 2,4 ± 1,2 III (n=30) 45 ± 28,5 3,5 ± 1,4 IV (n=10) 96 ± 38,5 5,5 ± 2,5 Vũ Đức Định, De Waele, Nguyễn Gia Bình Characteristics of CVVH related to IAP Grade
  • 14.
    Characteristics of freefluid drained IAP Grade Volume of fluid drained per catheter (X  SD) (ml) Positive fluid culture (n, %) Catheterization ( X SD) (days) I (n=5) 653±352 2 02 Ecoli 3,5 ± 2,3 II (n=20) 865±656 5 3 Ecoli 2 Enterococcus 5,2 ± 3,5 III (n=30) 2.553±755 5 3 Ecoli 2 Enterococcus 10,5 ± 3,8 IV (n=10) 2.853±456 4 3 Ecoli 1 Enterococcus 12,3 ± 8,5 overoll 1.564±583 19 (32,8) 8,2 ± 6,7
  • 15.
    IAP values insurvived vs non-survived patients
  • 16.
    SOFA scores insurvived vs non-survived patients
  • 17.
    Correlection between IAPand SOFA score y = 1,04x + 13,58 ; r = 0,81 ; p = 0,001 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 SOFA ALOB(cmH2O) Paivi Keskinen IAP
  • 18.
    Survived vs non-survivedpatients between WSACS grading classifications 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Grade I (n=15) Grade II (n=30) Grade III (n=30) Grade IV (n=10) 100 100 90 50 0 0 10 50 % Surived Non- suriverd
  • 19.
    Mortality rate Mortality rate Numberof organ failure (n), (%) 1 organ failure (n =41 ) 0 2 organ failure (n = 23) 1(4,3%) 3 - 4 organ failure (n = 17) 2 (11,8%) 5 - 6 organ failure (n = 8) 4(62,5%) Overall mortality (n = 85) 8 (14,5%) Paivi Keskinen, De Waele, Sun ZX, Nguyễn Quang Hải
  • 20.
  • 24.
    Conclutions  Combine CVVH+ tapping and draining the fluid collection: Reduce significant mortality.  IAP values when recorded throughout hospitalization during the first 7 days correlate with SOFA scores and mortality rates and can be used as a marker to guideline for treament, monitor the course of illness in acute pancreatitis.
  • 25.