Uploaded byalbertrodriguez5150
PDF, PPTX209 views

Istation Report - 3 November

This document provides student assessment data from the Istation reading program for November 2017. It includes the percentage of students scoring in Tier 1 at various campuses for grades Pre-K through 5th from September through November. Additionally, it breaks down Tier 1 percentages by student demographics like English language learner status and grade level. The data is for internal use only and was pulled on November 13, 2017.

Embed presentation

Download as PDF, PPTX
Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 77% 79% 26 4 3 33 54% 64% 74% 37 8 5 50 41% 54% 65% 35 15 4 54 63% 57% 69% 40 11 7 58 Bonham 62% 67% 45 14 8 67 63% 77% 67% 60 16 13 89 55% 49% 61% 57 25 12 94 61% 65% 68% 78 18 18 114 Bowie 52% 65% 17 8 1 26 38% 56% 62% 24 8 7 39 33% 46% 54% 22 9 10 41 67% 72% 74% 42 11 4 57 Crockett 53% 61% 11 5 2 18 81% 69% 82% 23 4 1 28 49% 48% 51% 28 16 11 55 45% 56% 56% 31 12 12 55 Dishman 62% 62% 23 7 7 37 53% 71% 76% 28 6 3 37 65% 81% 86% 42 6 1 49 66% 72% 71% 41 6 11 58 Houston 43% 58% 19 8 6 33 40% 48% 61% 38 14 10 62 46% 47% 58% 43 23 8 74 56% 49% 65% 33 9 9 51 Jefferson 43% 46% 17 7 13 37 47% 58% 57% 17 7 6 30 51% 54% 73% 29 6 5 40 70% 68% 69% 34 9 6 49 Lamar 30% 44% 16 10 10 36 48% 68% 67% 41 11 9 61 39% 42% 52% 32 17 13 62 48% 55% 52% 32 19 11 62 Long 65% 69% 45 9 11 65 60% 67% 69% 57 16 10 83 56% 55% 59% 48 24 10 82 56% 56% 60% 62 20 21 103 Means 57% 53% 23 11 9 43 53% 68% 65% 44 16 8 68 64% 65% 78% 60 12 5 77 74% 69% 76% 57 12 6 75 Milam N/T 41% 9 2 11 22 36% 49% 55% 28 11 12 51 35% 50% 64% 28 8 8 44 53% 57% 58% 28 7 13 48 Rodriguez 65% 58% 32 14 9 55 51% 71% 71% 60 17 7 84 40% 57% 58% 63 26 20 109 54% 48% 55% 52 11 31 94 Stuart 60% 68% 44 13 8 65 63% 71% 76% 69 13 9 91 65% 67% 74% 80 16 12 108 71% 79% 80% 96 19 5 120 Travis 38% 42% 13 8 10 31 49% 66% 70% 26 9 2 37 38% 48% 56% 19 8 7 34 55% 55% 63% 34 12 8 54 Treasure Hills 51% 61% 51 15 17 83 53% 63% 72% 71 17 11 99 62% 64% 68% 94 25 19 138 74% 72% 76% 104 19 14 137 Wilson 52% 80% 28 5 2 35 65% 65% 71% 36 12 3 51 58% 69% 75% 45 13 2 60 76% 68% 76% 54 11 6 71 Zavala 44% 56% 18 7 7 32 52% 57% 65% 35 10 9 54 45% 50% 56% 31 16 8 55 54% 53% 59% 30 10 11 51 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 64% 65% 61% 35 13 9 57 51% 53% 49% 25 20 6 51 56% 69% 59% 30 10 11 51 All Students assessed on campus Bonham 58% 62% 59% 67 31 15 113 59% 60% 65% 73 19 21 113 65% 72% 65% 64 15 20 99 Tier 1 % By GRD LVL&Campus Bowie 65% 79% 73% 38 10 4 52 69% 64% 67% 33 7 9 49 64% 69% 66% 37 12 7 56 Source: Istation Crockett 64% 63% 68% 42 12 8 62 42% 46% 43% 29 19 20 68 63% 67% 73% 36 4 9 49 Data pulled: 11/13/2017 Dishman 63% 65% 66% 33 13 4 50 60% 51% 51% 22 8 13 43 49% N/T 56% 28 16 6 50 For Internal Use Only Houston 57% 54% 62% 41 11 14 66 52% 48% 59% 38 14 12 64 79% 69% 76% 41 4 9 54 Jefferson 75% 73% 76% 29 7 2 38 69% 67% 64% 23 9 4 36 78% 73% 69% 38 11 6 55 Lamar 41% 40% 43% 34 22 23 79 41% 47% 40% 57 24 34 115 55% 54% 52% 48 24 21 93 Long 59% 63% 66% 61 15 16 92 70% 70% 71% 72 16 13 101 64% 72% 71% 77 17 15 109 Means 64% 68% 67% 63 21 10 94 68% 74% 73% 66 13 11 90 73% 67% 69% 53 14 10 77 Milam 50% 53% 54% 37 15 16 68 57% 48% 50% 28 14 14 56 66% 66% 66% 42 11 11 64 Rodriguez 56% 59% 60% 62 16 25 103 50% 54% 58% 73 25 27 125 65% 70% 69% 72 14 18 104 Stuart 76% 78% 81% 100 20 4 124 75% 77% 79% 104 19 8 131 79% 79% 74% 81 19 10 110 Travis 44% 60% 55% 27 14 8 49 74% 79% 82% 36 5 3 44 64% 69% 67% 37 7 11 55 Treasure Hills72% 78% 77% 105 25 6 136 70% 73% 74% 102 26 9 137 65% 62% 54% 71 40 21 132 Wilson 60% 65% 61% 44 19 9 72 53% 62% 57% 55 25 16 96 75% 66% 69% 50 12 10 72 Zavala 65% 71% 68% 42 11 9 62 63% 72% 68% 34 8 8 50 72% 69% 69% 35 11 5 51 Istation Reading November 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier2ND Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH PK KG 3RD 4TH 1ST Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 1 1 25% 42% 44% 4 2 3 9 22% 50% 60% 3 2 5 36% 36% 50% 6 5 1 12 Bonham 0 0% 0% 0% 1 1 50% 0% 33% 1 2 3 26% 24% 30% 6 4 10 20 Bowie 50% 83% 5 1 6 29% 60% 67% 4 1 1 6 25% 43% 57% 4 3 7 43% 57% 64% 9 3 2 14 Crockett 0% 1 1 100% 100% 100% 2 2 25% 25% 29% 6 9 6 21 44% 61% 58% 11 4 4 19 Dishman 17% 1 1 4 6 100% 100% 0 57% 86% 86% 6 1 7 56% 67% 60% 6 1 3 10 Houston 0% 0 43% 0% 0% 2 2 45% 100% 67% 2 1 3 22% 50% 100% 3 3 Jefferson 0% 0% 1 3 4 50% 60% 50% 1 1 2 13% 6% 0% 2 2 4 78% 72% 78% 14 3 1 18 Lamar 0% 0% 1 1 100% 60% 67% 4 1 1 6 18% 60% 50% 2 2 4 30% 60% 60% 3 2 5 Long 50% 67% 2 1 3 25% 50% 50% 1 1 2 22% 44% 44% 4 4 1 9 50% 50% 46% 5 2 4 11 Means 0 0% 1 1 100% 100% 100% 3 3 100% 75% 75% 3 1 4 Milam N/T 0% 1 1 2 31% 0% 43% 3 2 2 7 21% 20% 33% 3 1 5 9 39% 28% 28% 5 4 9 18 Rodriguez 0 0% 100% 100% 1 1 43% 58% 50% 3 1 2 6 29% 33% 28% 5 3 10 18 Stuart 18% 55% 6 1 4 11 36% 42% 33% 4 3 5 12 65% 53% 56% 10 4 4 18 67% 76% 76% 16 3 2 21 Travis 0% 25% 1 3 4 25% 0 6% 0% 0% 1 1 62% 53% 64% 9 3 2 14 Treasure Hills 25% 0% 2 2 44% 44% 50% 5 2 3 10 23% 31% 38% 5 2 6 13 67% 22% 56% 5 1 3 9 Wilson 100% 1 1 100% 75% 100% 1 1 33% 50% 50% 1 1 2 100% 80% 88% 7 1 8 Zavala 0% 2 2 50% 55% 55% 6 3 2 11 29% 57% 43% 3 2 2 7 56% 56% 61% 11 3 4 18 AVG 27% 34% 44 47% 53% 51% 73 35% 46% 47% 122 53% 53% 60% 222 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 71% 56% 56% 5 1 3 9 17% 57% 43% 3 4 0 7 25% 33% 75% 3 1 0 4 Students w/ LEP Indicator Y Bonham 44% 25% 38% 3 4 1 8 30% 27% 25% 3 2 7 12 20% 33% 29% 2 1 4 7 Tier 1% By Grade Lvl&Campus Bowie 59% 76% 65% 11 5 1 17 56% 50% 50% 8 3 5 16 56% 63% 63% 5 1 2 8 Source: Istation Crockett 57% 65% 68% 15 5 2 22 47% 42% 56% 15 7 5 27 69% 33% 50% 4 1 3 8 Data pulled: 11/13/2017 Dishman 50% 75% 46% 6 6 1 13 40% 60% 60% 3 2 5 38% 0% 36% 4 4 3 11 For Internal Use Only Houston 25% 25% 50% 2 2 4 38% 33% 50% 5 3 2 10 57% 57% 57% 4 1 2 7 Jefferson 80% 73% 73% 11 3 1 15 67% 45% 46% 6 5 2 13 67% 55% 50% 10 5 5 20 Lamar 39% 36% 36% 9 7 9 25 36% 39% 38% 12 7 13 32 44% 43% 36% 8 6 8 22 Long 50% 50% 45% 5 1 5 11 40% 40% 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 14% 25% 2 2 4 8 Means 36% 39% 42% 10 9 5 24 58% 47% 50% 9 4 5 18 71% 57% 46% 6 5 2 13 Milam 47% 41% 16% 3 9 7 19 61% 36% 47% 7 3 5 15 33% 31% 40% 6 5 4 15 Rodriguez 36% 58% 56% 15 6 6 27 41% 52% 54% 13 4 7 24 33% 33% 35% 7 4 9 20 Stuart 60% 40% 70% 7 1 2 10 25% 46% 54% 7 3 3 13 88% 50% 78% 7 2 9 Travis 40% 53% 40% 6 6 3 15 75% 82% 70% 7 2 1 10 13% 25% 13% 1 3 4 8 Treasure Hills 58% 67% 89% 8 1 9 63% 67% 50% 3 3 6 43% 43% 0% 4 4 8 Wilson 56% 50% 60% 9 4 2 15 50% 67% 46% 6 6 1 13 83% 56% 70% 7 2 1 10 Zavala 57% 52% 64% 14 3 5 22 47% 29% 17% 1 2 3 6 67% 43% 50% 3 2 1 6 AVG 51% 52% 54% 265 47% 48% 47% 232 47% 39% 44% 184 Istation Reading November 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by TierPK KG 1ST 2ND Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH4TH3RD Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Tested Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 1 1 56% 44% 30% 3 3 4 10 25% 0% 0% 1 5 6 100% 100% 100% 1 0 0 1 0 Bonham 33% 50% 3 2 1 6 67% 33% 67% 8 1 3 12 73% 62% 77% 10 3 13 0 0 Bowie 73% 82% 9 2 11 50% 29% 100% 3 3 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 1 1 50% 50% 1 1 2 Crockett 83% 83% 10 1 1 12 67% 67% 67% 8 3 1 12 0% 0% 1 1 0 0 Dishman 0 0% 17% 20% 1 1 3 5 17% 0 0 100% 100% 100% 1 1 Houston 63% 86% 6 1 7 67% 44% 56% 5 2 2 9 73% 67% 42% 5 4 3 12 11% 50% 4 1 3 8 75% 31% 75% 3 1 4 Jefferson 40% 50% 2 2 4 55% 82% 92% 11 1 12 57% 43% 50% 7 4 3 14 0 0 Lamar 60% 63% 15 6 3 24 37% 53% 71% 10 2 2 14 58% 58% 55% 17 3 11 31 73% 69% 85% 11 2 13 36% 44% 42% 13 7 11 31 Long 38% 0 ~~ 25% 0 ~~ 20% 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 Means 38% 56% 9 2 5 16 36% 43% 47% 7 4 4 15 72% 72% 66% 19 9 1 29 73% 52% 75% 24 6 2 32 50% 0% 0% 1 1 2 Milam 36% 4 4 3 11 29% 48% 55% 11 4 5 20 39% 42% 36% 9 8 8 25 30% 30% 34% 10 7 12 29 26% 28% 26% 9 4 21 34 Rodriguez 67% 91% 10 1 11 38% 69% 85% 11 2 13 33% 36% 38% 5 7 1 13 0 33% 33% 33% 1 2 3 Stuart 55% 80% 4 1 5 36% 36% 63% 5 1 2 8 44% 41% 7 4 6 17 0 0% 100% 100% 1 1 Travis 57% 25% 2 4 2 8 38% 29% 40% 6 2 7 15 50% 31% 25% 4 6 6 16 33% 33% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 1 1 Treasure Hills 67% 33% 3 3 3 9 40% 50% 50% 2 2 4 33% 0% 0% 1 2 3 0% 0% 0% 1 1 33% 33% 33% 1 1 1 3 Wilson 44% 67% 6 1 2 9 54% 57% 38% 5 6 2 13 80% 50% 60% 6 1 3 10 100% 100% 4 4 80% 75% 100% 2 2 Zavala 40% 43% 3 3 1 7 8% 55% 36% 4 4 3 11 14% 1 3 3 7 67% 100% 100% 1 1 2 0 AVG 57% 141 42% 46% 176 49% 34% 198 54% 50% 93 44% 44% 84 All Students assessed in Español Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Source: Istation Data pulled: 11/14/2017 ~~ No students assessed in Español For Internal Use Only Istation Reading Español November 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier 3RD2ND1STKGPK
Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 1 1 25% 50% 0 25% 25% 20% 1 3 1 5 13% 0% 14% 1 2 4 7 Bonham 50% 75% 3 1 4 100% 50% 20% 1 1 3 5 0 33% 33% 29% 2 2 3 7 Bowie 0 0 0% 0% 0% 2 2 100% 100% 100% 2 2 Crockett 0 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 2 5 7 Dishman 50% 50% 1 1 2 50% 50% 100% 1 1 100% 100% 100% 1 1 33% 20% 20% 1 4 5 Houston 0 0% 0% 50% 1 1 2 25% 25% 25% 1 3 4 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 Jefferson 20% 40% 2 3 5 0% 0% 3 3 0% 50% 33% 1 1 1 3 40% 40% 40% 2 3 5 Lamar 0% 0% 1 1 2 0% 1 1 25% 0% 17% 1 1 4 6 0% 0% 0% 2 4 6 Long 100% 1 1 33% 25% 67% 2 1 3 17% 33% 20% 1 3 1 5 17% 15% 14% 2 3 9 14 Means 100% 1 1 0% 3 5 8 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 67% 67% 57% 4 2 1 7 Milam 0 0% 0% 0% 2 2 0% 0% 0% 2 2 50% 50% 33% 1 2 3 Rodriguez 0% 100% 1 1 33% 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 17% 14% 14% 1 1 5 7 25% 0% 14% 1 6 7 Stuart 0% 100% 2 2 67% 67% 67% 2 1 3 20% 20% 17% 1 2 3 6 100% 100% 100% 1 1 Travis 0 0% 50% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 2 2 50% 0% 50% 1 1 2 Treasure Hills 0% 0% 1 1 2 80% 50% 80% 4 1 5 33% 20% 40% 2 3 5 33% 33% 20% 1 3 1 5 Wilson 0 100% 100% 100% 1 1 0% 0% 100% 1 1 0% 100% 1 1 Zavala 33% 67% 2 1 3 40% 40% 57% 4 1 2 7 0% 20% 0% 3 2 5 67% 67% 67% 2 1 3 AVG 28% 67% 24 41% 36% 41% 48 16% 19% 24% 58 39% 31% 39% 85 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 40% 20% 25% 1 1 2 4 0% 29% 17% 1 3 2 6 13% 33% 25% 2 1 5 8 All Students w/SPED Indicator(Y) Bonham 20% 0% 20% 2 2 6 10 17% 13% 9% 1 1 9 11 14% 29% 18% 2 1 8 11 Tier 1 % By Grd Lvl & Campus Bowie 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 0% 20% 17% 1 5 6 0% 0% 0% 2 3 5 Source: Istation Crockett 42% 17% 33% 4 2 6 12 0% 0% 0% 1 7 8 13% 10% 17% 1 5 6 Data pulled: 11/13/2017 Dishman 0% 33% 0% 1 2 3 0% 0% 0% 4 4 25% 0% 25% 1 3 4 For Internal Use Only Houston 13% 0% 17% 1 5 6 11% 0% 0% 3 6 9 50% 30% 36% 4 1 6 11 Jefferson 33% 0% 0% 3 2 5 0 0% 0% 0% 2 2 Lamar 0% 0% 0% 7 7 0% 0% 0% 1 14 15 0% 0% 0% 1 7 8 Long 7% 21% 14% 2 2 10 14 0% 0% 10% 1 2 7 10 6% 0% 6% 1 3 12 16 Means 0% 0% 0% 1 4 5 50% 33% 33% 1 2 3 25% 14% 25% 2 1 5 8 Milam 17% 0% 0% 4 4 8 0% 0% 0% 7 7 14% 14% 17% 1 2 3 6 Rodriguez 25% 22% 20% 2 8 10 25% 18% 18% 2 2 7 11 7% 7% 6% 1 5 11 17 Stuart 100% 100% 100% 2 2 33% 33% 33% 2 1 3 6 0% 50% 0% 1 1 2 Travis 0% 25% 0% 1 3 4 25% 0% 50% 2 1 1 4 11% 11% 8% 1 2 9 12 Treasure Hills 33% 40% 50% 5 1 4 10 17% 13% 7% 1 7 6 14 25% 0% 20% 1 2 2 5 Wilson 9% 20% 17% 2 4 6 12 10% 10% 10% 1 4 5 10 36% 27% 36% 4 2 5 11 Zavala 33% 33% 33% 1 2 3 33% 33% 17% 1 1 4 6 13% 25% 11% 1 3 5 9 AVG 22% 19% 19% 118 14% 13% 14% 130 15% 15% 15% 141 Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH4TH3RD Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading November 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by TierPK KG 1ST 2ND

More Related Content

PDF
Istation monthly report for 2018 rdg dec
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
PDF
Istation Report - 2 October
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
PDF
Effort Report KPI's for salesman efficiency
byEric Smith
 
PDF
Vendas por Marca
byEduardo Abbas
 
PDF
Hoja 3
byjohanna vizuete
 
PDF
富邦投顧研究部核心持股2011年殖利率 02.17.2012
byyo9889
 
PDF
Practica escel 4
byNorman Lucero
 
PDF
Practica escel 23
byisrael paucar
 
Istation monthly report for 2018 rdg dec
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Istation Report - 2 October
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Effort Report KPI's for salesman efficiency
byEric Smith
 
Vendas por Marca
byEduardo Abbas
 
Hoja 3
byjohanna vizuete
 
富邦投顧研究部核心持股2011年殖利率 02.17.2012
byyo9889
 
Practica escel 4
byNorman Lucero
 
Practica escel 23
byisrael paucar
 

What's hot

PDF
practica excel
byYessenia Esparza
 
PDF
Sample Summaries 3-6-16
byPaul K. King, II
 
PDF
Excel referencias2
byyuliana garcía
 
PDF
exel referencias
byKaty Saula
 
PDF
Résultats Annuels 2015 En MDH
bywww.bourse-maroc.org
 
PPTX
Ranking BR Insurance Market - Nov/2021
byGabriel Saviolli
 
PDF
Tx -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
bysatoriwatersfl
 
PDF
Tugas 1
byHakin Nazili
 
PDF
Modelos Julho
byEduardo Abbas
 
PPSX
Tablas propoleos
byRalMejia1
 
PDF
Modelos de carros
byEduardo Abbas
 
DOCX
Sas 16 08-2014-test
byakshitslide
 
PDF
Quinche a. referencias y filtros pdf
byAnderson Bladimir
 
PDF
Résultats élections régionales 20151206
byGrégory MACÉ
 
PPTX
Silver Summit Master Plan Final
bySummer Young
 
practica excel
byYessenia Esparza
 
Sample Summaries 3-6-16
byPaul K. King, II
 
Excel referencias2
byyuliana garcía
 
exel referencias
byKaty Saula
 
Résultats Annuels 2015 En MDH
bywww.bourse-maroc.org
 
Ranking BR Insurance Market - Nov/2021
byGabriel Saviolli
 
Tx -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
bysatoriwatersfl
 
Tugas 1
byHakin Nazili
 
Modelos Julho
byEduardo Abbas
 
Tablas propoleos
byRalMejia1
 
Modelos de carros
byEduardo Abbas
 
Sas 16 08-2014-test
byakshitslide
 
Quinche a. referencias y filtros pdf
byAnderson Bladimir
 
Résultats élections régionales 20151206
byGrégory MACÉ
 
Silver Summit Master Plan Final
bySummer Young
 

More from albertrodriguez5150

PDF
District calendar-2019-2020
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
PDF
Early spanish reading power point
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Esperanza update 020618
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Ode' to bilingual education
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Ode' to Bilingual Education
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
PDF
Istation Report - 1 September
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
PPT
Why garden
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Action plan
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Design team 3
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
PPTX
Vocabulous jan 30
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOC
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Iu 5 final
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Rubric
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Rubric
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Assessment for iu 5
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Rubric for iu 5
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Strengths in the addie model
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
DOCX
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
PPT
Tac2010 standardsetting
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
PDF
How the moon affects the earth
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
District calendar-2019-2020
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Early spanish reading power point
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Esperanza update 020618
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Ode' to bilingual education
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Ode' to Bilingual Education
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Istation Report - 1 September
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Why garden
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Action plan
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Design team 3
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Vocabulous jan 30
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Iu 5 final
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Rubric
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Rubric
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Assessment for iu 5
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Rubric for iu 5
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Strengths in the addie model
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
Tac2010 standardsetting
byalbertrodriguez5150
 
How the moon affects the earth
byalbertrodriguez5150
 

Recently uploaded

PPTX
special senses-eye, ear, nose, tongue.pptx
byAshish Umale
 
PPTX
Statistical Data Analysis using R Programming.pptx
byVETRISELVIP1
 
PPTX
Overview of Unapproved Timeoff in Odoo 19
byCeline George
 
PPTX
bundle of care.pptx Priti Bala @ BRD med
bypritibala13
 
PPTX
Pneumonia, Social and Preventive Pharmacy .pptx
byVirat Ojha
 
PPTX
The Creation Pattern Physical Health.pptx
byTammy Hulse
 
PPTX
RECTAL IRRIGATION...................pptx
byAneetaSharma15
 
PPTX
Ultrasound .pptx by Nagmani ojha (paramedical department)(Radiation technolog...
bynagmaniojha8
 
PDF
Caribbean Examinations Council Literacy and Numeracy Standards
byCaribbean Examinations Council
 
PDF
GIÁO ÁN KẾ HOẠCH BÀI DẠY NĂNG LỰC SỐ MÔN TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUC...
byNguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
PPTX
How to create Article in Odoo 18 Knowledge App
byCeline George
 
PDF
GIÁO ÁN KẾ HOẠCH BÀI DẠY NĂNG LỰC SỐ MÔN TIẾNG ANH LỚP 10 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUC...
byNguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
PDF
ĐỀ MINH HỌA KỲ THI TỐT NGHIỆP TRUNG HỌC PHỔ THÔNG NĂM 2026 MÔN TIẾNG ANH 2026...
byNguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
PPTX
How to Manage Product Types in Odoo 18 Sales
byCeline George
 
PDF
To synthesis and submit Benzamide synthesis.pdf
byPradeep Swarnkar
 
PPTX
YSPH VMOC Special Report - Measles - The Americas 1-18-2026
byYale School of Public Health - The Virtual Medical Operations Center (VMOC)
 
PPTX
STERILITY INDICATOR Pharmaceutical microbiology
byChetana Wagh
 
PPTX
VAGINAL IRRIGATION..................pptx
byAneetaSharma15
 
PPTX
VITAMINS CHAPTER NO.05 PHARMACOGNOSY D. PHARMACY
byGanu Gavade
 
PPTX
Activity on Job position in Odoo 19 Recruitment
byCeline George
 
special senses-eye, ear, nose, tongue.pptx
byAshish Umale
 
Statistical Data Analysis using R Programming.pptx
byVETRISELVIP1
 
Overview of Unapproved Timeoff in Odoo 19
byCeline George
 
bundle of care.pptx Priti Bala @ BRD med
bypritibala13
 
Pneumonia, Social and Preventive Pharmacy .pptx
byVirat Ojha
 
The Creation Pattern Physical Health.pptx
byTammy Hulse
 
RECTAL IRRIGATION...................pptx
byAneetaSharma15
 
Ultrasound .pptx by Nagmani ojha (paramedical department)(Radiation technolog...
bynagmaniojha8
 
Caribbean Examinations Council Literacy and Numeracy Standards
byCaribbean Examinations Council
 
GIÁO ÁN KẾ HOẠCH BÀI DẠY NĂNG LỰC SỐ MÔN TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUC...
byNguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
How to create Article in Odoo 18 Knowledge App
byCeline George
 
GIÁO ÁN KẾ HOẠCH BÀI DẠY NĂNG LỰC SỐ MÔN TIẾNG ANH LỚP 10 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUC...
byNguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
ĐỀ MINH HỌA KỲ THI TỐT NGHIỆP TRUNG HỌC PHỔ THÔNG NĂM 2026 MÔN TIẾNG ANH 2026...
byNguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
How to Manage Product Types in Odoo 18 Sales
byCeline George
 
To synthesis and submit Benzamide synthesis.pdf
byPradeep Swarnkar
 
YSPH VMOC Special Report - Measles - The Americas 1-18-2026
byYale School of Public Health - The Virtual Medical Operations Center (VMOC)
 
STERILITY INDICATOR Pharmaceutical microbiology
byChetana Wagh
 
VAGINAL IRRIGATION..................pptx
byAneetaSharma15
 
VITAMINS CHAPTER NO.05 PHARMACOGNOSY D. PHARMACY
byGanu Gavade
 
Activity on Job position in Odoo 19 Recruitment
byCeline George
 

Istation Report - 3 November

  • 1.
    Tested Tested TestedTested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 77% 79% 26 4 3 33 54% 64% 74% 37 8 5 50 41% 54% 65% 35 15 4 54 63% 57% 69% 40 11 7 58 Bonham 62% 67% 45 14 8 67 63% 77% 67% 60 16 13 89 55% 49% 61% 57 25 12 94 61% 65% 68% 78 18 18 114 Bowie 52% 65% 17 8 1 26 38% 56% 62% 24 8 7 39 33% 46% 54% 22 9 10 41 67% 72% 74% 42 11 4 57 Crockett 53% 61% 11 5 2 18 81% 69% 82% 23 4 1 28 49% 48% 51% 28 16 11 55 45% 56% 56% 31 12 12 55 Dishman 62% 62% 23 7 7 37 53% 71% 76% 28 6 3 37 65% 81% 86% 42 6 1 49 66% 72% 71% 41 6 11 58 Houston 43% 58% 19 8 6 33 40% 48% 61% 38 14 10 62 46% 47% 58% 43 23 8 74 56% 49% 65% 33 9 9 51 Jefferson 43% 46% 17 7 13 37 47% 58% 57% 17 7 6 30 51% 54% 73% 29 6 5 40 70% 68% 69% 34 9 6 49 Lamar 30% 44% 16 10 10 36 48% 68% 67% 41 11 9 61 39% 42% 52% 32 17 13 62 48% 55% 52% 32 19 11 62 Long 65% 69% 45 9 11 65 60% 67% 69% 57 16 10 83 56% 55% 59% 48 24 10 82 56% 56% 60% 62 20 21 103 Means 57% 53% 23 11 9 43 53% 68% 65% 44 16 8 68 64% 65% 78% 60 12 5 77 74% 69% 76% 57 12 6 75 Milam N/T 41% 9 2 11 22 36% 49% 55% 28 11 12 51 35% 50% 64% 28 8 8 44 53% 57% 58% 28 7 13 48 Rodriguez 65% 58% 32 14 9 55 51% 71% 71% 60 17 7 84 40% 57% 58% 63 26 20 109 54% 48% 55% 52 11 31 94 Stuart 60% 68% 44 13 8 65 63% 71% 76% 69 13 9 91 65% 67% 74% 80 16 12 108 71% 79% 80% 96 19 5 120 Travis 38% 42% 13 8 10 31 49% 66% 70% 26 9 2 37 38% 48% 56% 19 8 7 34 55% 55% 63% 34 12 8 54 Treasure Hills 51% 61% 51 15 17 83 53% 63% 72% 71 17 11 99 62% 64% 68% 94 25 19 138 74% 72% 76% 104 19 14 137 Wilson 52% 80% 28 5 2 35 65% 65% 71% 36 12 3 51 58% 69% 75% 45 13 2 60 76% 68% 76% 54 11 6 71 Zavala 44% 56% 18 7 7 32 52% 57% 65% 35 10 9 54 45% 50% 56% 31 16 8 55 54% 53% 59% 30 10 11 51 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 64% 65% 61% 35 13 9 57 51% 53% 49% 25 20 6 51 56% 69% 59% 30 10 11 51 All Students assessed on campus Bonham 58% 62% 59% 67 31 15 113 59% 60% 65% 73 19 21 113 65% 72% 65% 64 15 20 99 Tier 1 % By GRD LVL&Campus Bowie 65% 79% 73% 38 10 4 52 69% 64% 67% 33 7 9 49 64% 69% 66% 37 12 7 56 Source: Istation Crockett 64% 63% 68% 42 12 8 62 42% 46% 43% 29 19 20 68 63% 67% 73% 36 4 9 49 Data pulled: 11/13/2017 Dishman 63% 65% 66% 33 13 4 50 60% 51% 51% 22 8 13 43 49% N/T 56% 28 16 6 50 For Internal Use Only Houston 57% 54% 62% 41 11 14 66 52% 48% 59% 38 14 12 64 79% 69% 76% 41 4 9 54 Jefferson 75% 73% 76% 29 7 2 38 69% 67% 64% 23 9 4 36 78% 73% 69% 38 11 6 55 Lamar 41% 40% 43% 34 22 23 79 41% 47% 40% 57 24 34 115 55% 54% 52% 48 24 21 93 Long 59% 63% 66% 61 15 16 92 70% 70% 71% 72 16 13 101 64% 72% 71% 77 17 15 109 Means 64% 68% 67% 63 21 10 94 68% 74% 73% 66 13 11 90 73% 67% 69% 53 14 10 77 Milam 50% 53% 54% 37 15 16 68 57% 48% 50% 28 14 14 56 66% 66% 66% 42 11 11 64 Rodriguez 56% 59% 60% 62 16 25 103 50% 54% 58% 73 25 27 125 65% 70% 69% 72 14 18 104 Stuart 76% 78% 81% 100 20 4 124 75% 77% 79% 104 19 8 131 79% 79% 74% 81 19 10 110 Travis 44% 60% 55% 27 14 8 49 74% 79% 82% 36 5 3 44 64% 69% 67% 37 7 11 55 Treasure Hills72% 78% 77% 105 25 6 136 70% 73% 74% 102 26 9 137 65% 62% 54% 71 40 21 132 Wilson 60% 65% 61% 44 19 9 72 53% 62% 57% 55 25 16 96 75% 66% 69% 50 12 10 72 Zavala 65% 71% 68% 42 11 9 62 63% 72% 68% 34 8 8 50 72% 69% 69% 35 11 5 51 Istation Reading November 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier2ND Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH PK KG 3RD 4TH 1ST Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
  • 2.
    Tested Tested TestedTested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 1 1 25% 42% 44% 4 2 3 9 22% 50% 60% 3 2 5 36% 36% 50% 6 5 1 12 Bonham 0 0% 0% 0% 1 1 50% 0% 33% 1 2 3 26% 24% 30% 6 4 10 20 Bowie 50% 83% 5 1 6 29% 60% 67% 4 1 1 6 25% 43% 57% 4 3 7 43% 57% 64% 9 3 2 14 Crockett 0% 1 1 100% 100% 100% 2 2 25% 25% 29% 6 9 6 21 44% 61% 58% 11 4 4 19 Dishman 17% 1 1 4 6 100% 100% 0 57% 86% 86% 6 1 7 56% 67% 60% 6 1 3 10 Houston 0% 0 43% 0% 0% 2 2 45% 100% 67% 2 1 3 22% 50% 100% 3 3 Jefferson 0% 0% 1 3 4 50% 60% 50% 1 1 2 13% 6% 0% 2 2 4 78% 72% 78% 14 3 1 18 Lamar 0% 0% 1 1 100% 60% 67% 4 1 1 6 18% 60% 50% 2 2 4 30% 60% 60% 3 2 5 Long 50% 67% 2 1 3 25% 50% 50% 1 1 2 22% 44% 44% 4 4 1 9 50% 50% 46% 5 2 4 11 Means 0 0% 1 1 100% 100% 100% 3 3 100% 75% 75% 3 1 4 Milam N/T 0% 1 1 2 31% 0% 43% 3 2 2 7 21% 20% 33% 3 1 5 9 39% 28% 28% 5 4 9 18 Rodriguez 0 0% 100% 100% 1 1 43% 58% 50% 3 1 2 6 29% 33% 28% 5 3 10 18 Stuart 18% 55% 6 1 4 11 36% 42% 33% 4 3 5 12 65% 53% 56% 10 4 4 18 67% 76% 76% 16 3 2 21 Travis 0% 25% 1 3 4 25% 0 6% 0% 0% 1 1 62% 53% 64% 9 3 2 14 Treasure Hills 25% 0% 2 2 44% 44% 50% 5 2 3 10 23% 31% 38% 5 2 6 13 67% 22% 56% 5 1 3 9 Wilson 100% 1 1 100% 75% 100% 1 1 33% 50% 50% 1 1 2 100% 80% 88% 7 1 8 Zavala 0% 2 2 50% 55% 55% 6 3 2 11 29% 57% 43% 3 2 2 7 56% 56% 61% 11 3 4 18 AVG 27% 34% 44 47% 53% 51% 73 35% 46% 47% 122 53% 53% 60% 222 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 71% 56% 56% 5 1 3 9 17% 57% 43% 3 4 0 7 25% 33% 75% 3 1 0 4 Students w/ LEP Indicator Y Bonham 44% 25% 38% 3 4 1 8 30% 27% 25% 3 2 7 12 20% 33% 29% 2 1 4 7 Tier 1% By Grade Lvl&Campus Bowie 59% 76% 65% 11 5 1 17 56% 50% 50% 8 3 5 16 56% 63% 63% 5 1 2 8 Source: Istation Crockett 57% 65% 68% 15 5 2 22 47% 42% 56% 15 7 5 27 69% 33% 50% 4 1 3 8 Data pulled: 11/13/2017 Dishman 50% 75% 46% 6 6 1 13 40% 60% 60% 3 2 5 38% 0% 36% 4 4 3 11 For Internal Use Only Houston 25% 25% 50% 2 2 4 38% 33% 50% 5 3 2 10 57% 57% 57% 4 1 2 7 Jefferson 80% 73% 73% 11 3 1 15 67% 45% 46% 6 5 2 13 67% 55% 50% 10 5 5 20 Lamar 39% 36% 36% 9 7 9 25 36% 39% 38% 12 7 13 32 44% 43% 36% 8 6 8 22 Long 50% 50% 45% 5 1 5 11 40% 40% 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 14% 25% 2 2 4 8 Means 36% 39% 42% 10 9 5 24 58% 47% 50% 9 4 5 18 71% 57% 46% 6 5 2 13 Milam 47% 41% 16% 3 9 7 19 61% 36% 47% 7 3 5 15 33% 31% 40% 6 5 4 15 Rodriguez 36% 58% 56% 15 6 6 27 41% 52% 54% 13 4 7 24 33% 33% 35% 7 4 9 20 Stuart 60% 40% 70% 7 1 2 10 25% 46% 54% 7 3 3 13 88% 50% 78% 7 2 9 Travis 40% 53% 40% 6 6 3 15 75% 82% 70% 7 2 1 10 13% 25% 13% 1 3 4 8 Treasure Hills 58% 67% 89% 8 1 9 63% 67% 50% 3 3 6 43% 43% 0% 4 4 8 Wilson 56% 50% 60% 9 4 2 15 50% 67% 46% 6 6 1 13 83% 56% 70% 7 2 1 10 Zavala 57% 52% 64% 14 3 5 22 47% 29% 17% 1 2 3 6 67% 43% 50% 3 2 1 6 AVG 51% 52% 54% 265 47% 48% 47% 232 47% 39% 44% 184 Istation Reading November 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by TierPK KG 1ST 2ND Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH4TH3RD Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
  • 3.
    Tested Tested TestedTested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 1 1 56% 44% 30% 3 3 4 10 25% 0% 0% 1 5 6 100% 100% 100% 1 0 0 1 0 Bonham 33% 50% 3 2 1 6 67% 33% 67% 8 1 3 12 73% 62% 77% 10 3 13 0 0 Bowie 73% 82% 9 2 11 50% 29% 100% 3 3 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 1 1 50% 50% 1 1 2 Crockett 83% 83% 10 1 1 12 67% 67% 67% 8 3 1 12 0% 0% 1 1 0 0 Dishman 0 0% 17% 20% 1 1 3 5 17% 0 0 100% 100% 100% 1 1 Houston 63% 86% 6 1 7 67% 44% 56% 5 2 2 9 73% 67% 42% 5 4 3 12 11% 50% 4 1 3 8 75% 31% 75% 3 1 4 Jefferson 40% 50% 2 2 4 55% 82% 92% 11 1 12 57% 43% 50% 7 4 3 14 0 0 Lamar 60% 63% 15 6 3 24 37% 53% 71% 10 2 2 14 58% 58% 55% 17 3 11 31 73% 69% 85% 11 2 13 36% 44% 42% 13 7 11 31 Long 38% 0 ~~ 25% 0 ~~ 20% 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 Means 38% 56% 9 2 5 16 36% 43% 47% 7 4 4 15 72% 72% 66% 19 9 1 29 73% 52% 75% 24 6 2 32 50% 0% 0% 1 1 2 Milam 36% 4 4 3 11 29% 48% 55% 11 4 5 20 39% 42% 36% 9 8 8 25 30% 30% 34% 10 7 12 29 26% 28% 26% 9 4 21 34 Rodriguez 67% 91% 10 1 11 38% 69% 85% 11 2 13 33% 36% 38% 5 7 1 13 0 33% 33% 33% 1 2 3 Stuart 55% 80% 4 1 5 36% 36% 63% 5 1 2 8 44% 41% 7 4 6 17 0 0% 100% 100% 1 1 Travis 57% 25% 2 4 2 8 38% 29% 40% 6 2 7 15 50% 31% 25% 4 6 6 16 33% 33% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 1 1 Treasure Hills 67% 33% 3 3 3 9 40% 50% 50% 2 2 4 33% 0% 0% 1 2 3 0% 0% 0% 1 1 33% 33% 33% 1 1 1 3 Wilson 44% 67% 6 1 2 9 54% 57% 38% 5 6 2 13 80% 50% 60% 6 1 3 10 100% 100% 4 4 80% 75% 100% 2 2 Zavala 40% 43% 3 3 1 7 8% 55% 36% 4 4 3 11 14% 1 3 3 7 67% 100% 100% 1 1 2 0 AVG 57% 141 42% 46% 176 49% 34% 198 54% 50% 93 44% 44% 84 All Students assessed in Español Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Source: Istation Data pulled: 11/14/2017 ~~ No students assessed in Español For Internal Use Only Istation Reading Español November 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier 3RD2ND1STKGPK
  • 4.
    Tested Tested TestedTested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 1 1 25% 50% 0 25% 25% 20% 1 3 1 5 13% 0% 14% 1 2 4 7 Bonham 50% 75% 3 1 4 100% 50% 20% 1 1 3 5 0 33% 33% 29% 2 2 3 7 Bowie 0 0 0% 0% 0% 2 2 100% 100% 100% 2 2 Crockett 0 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 2 5 7 Dishman 50% 50% 1 1 2 50% 50% 100% 1 1 100% 100% 100% 1 1 33% 20% 20% 1 4 5 Houston 0 0% 0% 50% 1 1 2 25% 25% 25% 1 3 4 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 Jefferson 20% 40% 2 3 5 0% 0% 3 3 0% 50% 33% 1 1 1 3 40% 40% 40% 2 3 5 Lamar 0% 0% 1 1 2 0% 1 1 25% 0% 17% 1 1 4 6 0% 0% 0% 2 4 6 Long 100% 1 1 33% 25% 67% 2 1 3 17% 33% 20% 1 3 1 5 17% 15% 14% 2 3 9 14 Means 100% 1 1 0% 3 5 8 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 67% 67% 57% 4 2 1 7 Milam 0 0% 0% 0% 2 2 0% 0% 0% 2 2 50% 50% 33% 1 2 3 Rodriguez 0% 100% 1 1 33% 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 17% 14% 14% 1 1 5 7 25% 0% 14% 1 6 7 Stuart 0% 100% 2 2 67% 67% 67% 2 1 3 20% 20% 17% 1 2 3 6 100% 100% 100% 1 1 Travis 0 0% 50% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 2 2 50% 0% 50% 1 1 2 Treasure Hills 0% 0% 1 1 2 80% 50% 80% 4 1 5 33% 20% 40% 2 3 5 33% 33% 20% 1 3 1 5 Wilson 0 100% 100% 100% 1 1 0% 0% 100% 1 1 0% 100% 1 1 Zavala 33% 67% 2 1 3 40% 40% 57% 4 1 2 7 0% 20% 0% 3 2 5 67% 67% 67% 2 1 3 AVG 28% 67% 24 41% 36% 41% 48 16% 19% 24% 58 39% 31% 39% 85 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV T1 T2 T3 # Austin 40% 20% 25% 1 1 2 4 0% 29% 17% 1 3 2 6 13% 33% 25% 2 1 5 8 All Students w/SPED Indicator(Y) Bonham 20% 0% 20% 2 2 6 10 17% 13% 9% 1 1 9 11 14% 29% 18% 2 1 8 11 Tier 1 % By Grd Lvl & Campus Bowie 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 0% 20% 17% 1 5 6 0% 0% 0% 2 3 5 Source: Istation Crockett 42% 17% 33% 4 2 6 12 0% 0% 0% 1 7 8 13% 10% 17% 1 5 6 Data pulled: 11/13/2017 Dishman 0% 33% 0% 1 2 3 0% 0% 0% 4 4 25% 0% 25% 1 3 4 For Internal Use Only Houston 13% 0% 17% 1 5 6 11% 0% 0% 3 6 9 50% 30% 36% 4 1 6 11 Jefferson 33% 0% 0% 3 2 5 0 0% 0% 0% 2 2 Lamar 0% 0% 0% 7 7 0% 0% 0% 1 14 15 0% 0% 0% 1 7 8 Long 7% 21% 14% 2 2 10 14 0% 0% 10% 1 2 7 10 6% 0% 6% 1 3 12 16 Means 0% 0% 0% 1 4 5 50% 33% 33% 1 2 3 25% 14% 25% 2 1 5 8 Milam 17% 0% 0% 4 4 8 0% 0% 0% 7 7 14% 14% 17% 1 2 3 6 Rodriguez 25% 22% 20% 2 8 10 25% 18% 18% 2 2 7 11 7% 7% 6% 1 5 11 17 Stuart 100% 100% 100% 2 2 33% 33% 33% 2 1 3 6 0% 50% 0% 1 1 2 Travis 0% 25% 0% 1 3 4 25% 0% 50% 2 1 1 4 11% 11% 8% 1 2 9 12 Treasure Hills 33% 40% 50% 5 1 4 10 17% 13% 7% 1 7 6 14 25% 0% 20% 1 2 2 5 Wilson 9% 20% 17% 2 4 6 12 10% 10% 10% 1 4 5 10 36% 27% 36% 4 2 5 11 Zavala 33% 33% 33% 1 2 3 33% 33% 17% 1 1 4 6 13% 25% 11% 1 3 5 9 AVG 22% 19% 19% 118 14% 13% 14% 130 15% 15% 15% 141 Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH4TH3RD Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading November 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by TierPK KG 1ST 2ND