Global IP address and ASN allocation update
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•993 views
Presentation given by Guangliang Pan during the 2016 China Network Information Centre Open Policy Meeting (CNNIC OPM) held on the 14 July in Hangzhou, China.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Global IP address and ASN allocation update
Similar to Global IP address and ASN allocation update (20)
More from APNIC
More from APNIC (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Global IP address and ASN allocation update
- 1. Issue Date: Revision: Global IP & ASN Allocation Update 11 July 2016 July 2016 Guangliang Pan
- 2. Available IPv4 /8s in each RIR region Internet Number Resource ReportJune 2016
- 3. IPv4 Address space issued (RIRs to customers) In terms of /8s, how much space did each RIR issue by year? Internet Number Resource ReportJune 2016
- 4. APNIC IPv4 Delegations 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 4 From 103 pool From recovered pool /24 /23 /22 NIR New Existing By pool By size By Member As at 30 June
- 5. Current IPv4 Delegation Policy and Practice in each region • APNIC: Maximum /22 from final /8 (103/8). Requests for additional /22 from recovered pool will be put into the waiting list. • RIPE NCC: Maximum /22 from the final /8 pool for each member. • ARIN has run out their IPv4 free pool. All requests will be put into a waiting list. • LACNIC: Maximum /22 for each member every 6 months • AFRINIC: Expect to hit their final /8 early next year. 5
- 6. APNIC IPv4 Transfers 6 Used Did not use Using listing service Used Remaining Pre-approval usage As at 30 June 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Intra-RIR Inter-RIR
- 7. Which RIR allows IPv4 inter-RIR Transfers? • APNIC, ARIN and RIPE NCC implemented inter-RIR IPv4 transfer policy. • LACNIC and AFRINIC don’t have inter-RIR transfers policy. 7
- 8. IPv6 Allocations (RIRS to LIRs/ISPs) How many allocations have been made by each RIR by year? Internet Number Resource ReportJune 2016
- 9. Percentage of Members with both IPv4 & IPv6 by RIR region Internet Number Resource ReportJune 2016
- 10. APNIC IPv6 Delegations 10 By delegation type >=/31 /32 /43-/47 /48 By size By request type As at 30 June Allocation Assignment One-click Normal 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
- 11. Current IPv6 Delegation Policy and Practice • It is very easy to request IPv6 from all RIR • APNIC members can receive their IPv6 by one-click via MyAPNIC • CNNIC members can request their IPv6 from CNNIC easily 11
- 12. ASN Assignments (RIRs to customers) How many ASNs has each RIR assigned by year? Internet Number Resource ReportJune 2016
- 13. 4-Byte ASN Assignments How many 4-byte ASNs has each RIR assigned by year? Internet Number Resource ReportJune 2016
- 14. APNIC ASN Assignments 14 2-byte 4-byte By type Rejected Accepted 4-byte return rate As at 30 June 0 200 400 600 800 1000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 4-byte 2-byte
- 15. Current ASN Delegation Policy and Practice • Since 2007, RIRs started to delegate 4-byte AS Numbers • 2-byte AS Number is running out • All RIRs assign 4-byte AS Numbers by default now • If you request for a 2-byte AS Number, you need to prove either your equipment or upstream does not support 4-byte AS Number 15
- 17. Thank you
Editor's Notes
- So I want to explore if this is a problem in any sense, we can see in the address distribution function. Is this something in our core mission we’ve got wrong?
- What I’ve done is to examine the history of how membership and address assignment has gone, and how we stack up in IPv4 and IPv6 in terms of access to resources.
- Here you can see a sample of economies worldwide, and the calculated average for all economies. The graph is the amount of IPv4 per holder. And it has formed a group at between 10,000 and around 1,000,000 Ips per holder. That’s two decimal orders of magnitude difference. If you’re on the low side, you have a significant disadvantage on these numbers
- Here you can see a sample of economies worldwide, and the calculated average for all economies. The graph is the amount of IPv4 per holder. And it has formed a group at between 10,000 and around 1,000,000 Ips per holder. That’s two decimal orders of magnitude difference. If you’re on the low side, you have a significant disadvantage on these numbers
- Well.. China isn’t on the low side. You did a very good job of IPv4 distribution, and its equitably come out that CN on average has above the mean worldwide. You are still facing the problem of only 100,000 Ips per holder, so there is a real issue here in the face of IoT and multiple always on devices.
- SO now lets look in IPv6. And again, it forms a group
- SO now lets look in IPv6. And again, it forms a group
- And again, China is in the lucky position of being above average. You have a significant advantage here, in terms of how much IPv6 is already distributed.
- So finally for this comparison, if you look at the older history in V4, its clear China has done well: the historical allocations were well managed, and the new IPv6 allocations have been well managed. You guys did ok!
- So, this isnt an allocation problem. Its not about access, its about deployment. Its about who is using the IPs
- Survey closes 5 August. Four opportunities to win prizes of an Apple Watch Sport or a Microsoft Surface Pro 4.