Here are two examples where performing a risk assessment may be beneficial:
1. When introducing a new ingredient or food product. A risk assessment could help identify any potential biological, chemical, or physical hazards and evaluate the risk to consumers from exposure to help ensure the product is safe.
2. After receiving consumer complaints of illness related to a product. A risk assessment could help determine if there is a link between the product and illnesses by identifying hazards, evaluating exposures, and characterizing potential risks to understand what controls may need to be implemented.
Performing a risk assessment provides a systematic, science-based process to identify hazards and evaluate potential risks to public health from a food. This can help inform risk management decisions to improve food safety
2. Bachelors Degree –
Agricultural Sciences
The Pennsylvania State University
Masters Degree –
Poultry Science
Texas A & M University
20 years of industry experience including regulatory, meat and
poultry slaughter and processing, frozen food, bakeries, grain
mills, pet food, distribution and retail
3. Formed in 1977
10,000 employees
Inspection services for meat, poultry, eggs
produced at approximately 6,200 facilities
4. Formed in 1906
9,300 employees
Inspection services for fruit, vegetables, grains,
milk, tobacco, dietary supplements,
pharmaceuticals and veterinary products
produced at approximately 52,000 facilities
5. 1880 – first bill introduced to legislature (defeated)
1906 – Pure Food & Drugs Act
1907 – First Certified Color Regulations
1927 – Food & Drug Administration founded
1938 – Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act
1958 – First Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) list published
1969 – FDA begins sanitation oversight
1980 – Infant Formula Act
1990 – Nutritional Labeling & Education Act
1993 – Food Code model for foodservice & retail
1994 – Dietary Supplement Health & Education Act
1995 – Seafood HACCP
1998 – Juice HACCP
2000 – Safe Handling for Shell Eggs
2002 – Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act
2006 – Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act
2009 – Egg Safety Rule
6. 10/2009 - Food Safety Modernization Act introduced
1/6/2011 – President Obama signs into law
1/16/2013 – First Rules Published
7. The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)
incorporates a prevention-based philosophy
stressing Hazard Analysis & Critical Control
Point principles
8. Do you feel the Food Safety Modernization
Act will have a big impact on how you
conduct business?
9. Globalization
◦ 15 percent of U.S. food supply is imported
Food supply more high-tech and complex
◦ More foods in the marketplace
◦ New hazards in foods not previously seen
Shifting demographics
◦ Growing population (about 30%) of individuals are especially “at risk” for foodborne
illness
10. Involves creation of a new food safety system
Broad prevention mandate and accountability
New system of import oversight
Emphasizes partnerships
Emphasizes farm-to-table responsibility
Developed through broad coalition
12. Importers now responsible for ensuring that their foreign
suppliers have adequate preventive controls in place
FDA can rely on third parties to certify that foreign food
facilities meet U.S. requirements
Can require mandatory certification for high-risk foods
Can deny entry if FDA access for inspection is denied
Requires food from abroad to be as safe as domestic
13. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to amend its regulation for Current
Good Manufacturing Practice In Manufacturing, Packing, or Holding Human Food (CGMPs)
to modernize it and to add requirements for domestic and foreign facilities that are required
to register under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) to establish and
implement hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls for human food. FDA also is
proposing to revise certain definitions in FDA's current regulation for Registration of Food
Facilities to clarify the scope of the exemption from registration requirements provided by
the FD&C Act for “farms.” FDA is taking this action as part of its announced initiative to
revisit the CGMPs since they were last revised in 1986 and to implement new statutory
provisions in the FD&C Act. The proposed rule is intended to build a food safety system for
the future that makes modern, science-, and risk-based preventive controls the norm across
all sectors of the food system.
14. August 2012 14
• Creating a food safety culture starts with
every one of us
• As leaders, we must take accountability
for engaging our employees and
enhancing the food safety culture
15. How would you describe the Food Safety Culture
in your work environment?
16. 16
Passive
Operate just to pass the “audit”
Reactive
Food Safety is important, we
address it after an event
Calculative
We have systems in place to
manage all hazards
Proactive
We work on problems
that we still find
Generative
Food safety is built in the
way we work and think
17. Where is your facility / work environment
based upon the previous slide?
What steps need to be taken to continue to
evolve?
18. Mandatory Food Safety Programs (HACCP) for each
facility
FDA Authority for Recall
Implementation cost of $701 mil, annualized $472 mil
Still largely unknown due to delays in rulemaking
19. What do you think will be the biggest impact as
the law stands today?
Where would you focus your rule making?
20.
21.
22. Do you have a HACCP plan for your facility?
Do your customers already expect that you
do?
23.
24.
25. Risk management is defined for the purposes of the
Codex Alimentarius Commission as "The process,
distinct from risk assessment, of weighing policy
alternatives, in consultation with all interested
parties, considering risk assessment and other
factors relevant for the health protection of
consumers and for the promotion of fair trade
practices, and, if needed, selecting appropriate
prevention and control options.
26. Please give current examples of active risk
management within your organization.
27. The interactive exchange of information and
opinions throughout the risk analysis process
concerning risk, risk-related factors and risk
perceptions, among risk assessors, risk
managers, consumers, industry, the academic
community and other interested parties, including
the explanation of risk assessment findings and
the basis of risk management decisions.
28. Risk assessment is defined for the purposes of
the Codex Alimentarius Commission as "A
scientifically based process consisting of the
following steps: (i) hazard identification, (ii)
hazard characterization, (iii) exposure
assessment, and (iv) risk characterization."
29. "The identification of biological, chemical,
and physical agents capable of causing
adverse health effects and which may be
present in a particular food or group of
foods."
30. "The qualitative and/or quantitative evaluation of
the nature of the adverse health effects
associated with biological, chemical and physical
agents which may be present in food. For
chemical agents, a dose-response assessment
should be performed. For biological or physical
agents, a dose-response assessment should be
performed if the data are obtainable."
31. "The qualitative and/or quantitative
evaluation of the likely intake of biological,
chemical, and physical agents via food as well
as exposures from other sources if relevant."
32. "The qualitative and/or quantitative
estimation, including attendant uncertainties,
of the probability of occurrence and severity
of known or potential adverse health effects
in a given population based on hazard
identification, hazard characterization and
exposure assessment."