This document provides an introduction to rhetorical concepts for analyzing arguments. It defines key terms related to invention, arrangement, style, and the rhetorical appeals of logos, pathos, and ethos. It also outlines different components of building an argument, including establishing ethos and pathos, and evaluating sources and reliability.
Presentation about electronic tools for teaching k-12 students about citing sources. Web based bibliography makers are shown with comparisons and a companion web site. Citing sources is placed with in a continuum of learning to do research.
Presentation about electronic tools for teaching k-12 students about citing sources. Web based bibliography makers are shown with comparisons and a companion web site. Citing sources is placed with in a continuum of learning to do research.
1.Is there an abstract with a list of keywords preceding the res.docxcarlstromcurtis
1.
Is there an abstract with a list of keywords preceding the research paper?
Cover page?
Page numbers?
Indented paragraphs?
1” margins?
A total of 5 pages, not including the cover page, abstract and references page?
2. Introduction: Is the thesis clear? What is it?
Does it appear soon enough in the paper?
What questions does the thesis promise to answer? There are usually three, sometimes two, sometimes four or more.
1
2
3
Introduction: Is there some background given in the introduction that gives you some idea of why this topic is important or timely or relevant? What is it?
Introduction: Is there an engaging first sentence?
Is it an interesting fact,
alarming statistic,
question,
quote,
story
Introduction: Is there any terminology you need defined sooner to better understand the discussion that follows?
Body: In which paragraphs has each of the thesis questions been answered?
1
2
3
Body: Evidence: Has evidence been given to back up the claims made the research paper?
Since the research paper is required to have four sources, you should find at least
four different sources
cited in APA style as in-text citations (also called parenthetical citations).
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Body: Evidence: What type of evidence is each of the above – data, studies, expert opinion?
Body: Evidence: Is there enough evidence given to be convincing? Could it be improved?
i.
How?
updated statistics, any statistics, an explanation for conflicting statistics
a quote from an expert,
a more credible source, a primary source,
a case history or example
Body: Evidence: Are the in-text citations done properly in APA style?
Were you able to easily match up the in-text citation with the first word(s) in the References page?
Body: Evidence: In each paragraph, does the writer explain how each piece of evidence is pertinent to the thesis? If not, where?
Remember paragraph structure:
i.
Topic sentence
ii.
Support sentences
iii.
Closing sentence to help integrate the information in the support sentences with the topic sentence
and with the paper’s thesis
.
Body: Evidence: Are there any in-text (parenthetical) citations missing for quotations, expert opinion or data? Where?
i.
Were there any citations given for paraphrasing? Where?
ii. Are there any claims made that don't have evidence for them? That are based solely on the writer's opinion?
Body: Evidence: Are the cited sources credible and convincing?
Do any of the quotations or opinions or data need a signal phrase
i.
to explain who the author is and why the author is credible
ii.
or where the data comes from?
Body: Is there a logical progression of ideas?
Did each idea help support the thesis, or is something missing that would help you better understand the writer’s points?
Are there transitions missing that would help you understand how an idea, paragra.
This is my end to end description of what Hypercube can do for clients.
This deck explains semantics from first principles in a non technical way, before showing how these principles may be applied in managing business semantics. Finally a number of routes to technical deployment of semantics (ontology) solutions are shown.
This was presented to a workshop of the American Accounting Association in San Francisco in August 2019
Organizational BehaviorThe field of organizational behavior ca.docxamit657720
Organizational Behavior
The field of organizational behavior can be organized around three levels: individual level, team level, and organizational level. In other words, some theories focus on factors influencing individual behavior (e.g., personality, motivation). Some theories focus on factors influencing team or group behaviors (e.g., group development, conflict, roles). Still other theories focus on factors that tend to operate at an organizational level (e.g., structure, culture, leadership).
During the course, you have studied a variety of theories and perspectives at all these levels. Which ones seem most meaningful to you?
For your last paper:
Select one theory or perspective that you have studied that seems to be an individual level theme. One that you have studied that seems to be a team level theme. And one that you have studied that seems to be an organizational level theme. Summarize what those theories are and why each pertains to its corresponding level (individual, team, or organization).
Analyze those three theories based on this question: Why do people do what they do in organizations? That is, how do the theories you have selected help explain "organizational behavior?"
What are the challenges, problems, or difficulties in behavior as suggested by each of your theories?
What are the potential strategies and solutions (to the challenges) as suggested by your theories?
How do your three theories seem to fit together? How do they seem to interact with each other? What important lessons can you derive from thinking about the interaction of the theories?
Submission Details:
Submit your answers in a 5 Microsoft Word document, using APA style.
Support your work with examples and research.
Name your document SU_MGT3002_W5_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
.
HT06, Position Paper, Tagging, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, ToRead, Pr...cameron
Presentation given at Hypertext 2006 in Odense, Denmark on classifying tagging systems. <a href="http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~cameron/cv/pubs/2006-ht06-tagging-paper">Full paper available here</a>.
1.Is there an abstract with a list of keywords preceding the res.docxcarlstromcurtis
1.
Is there an abstract with a list of keywords preceding the research paper?
Cover page?
Page numbers?
Indented paragraphs?
1” margins?
A total of 5 pages, not including the cover page, abstract and references page?
2. Introduction: Is the thesis clear? What is it?
Does it appear soon enough in the paper?
What questions does the thesis promise to answer? There are usually three, sometimes two, sometimes four or more.
1
2
3
Introduction: Is there some background given in the introduction that gives you some idea of why this topic is important or timely or relevant? What is it?
Introduction: Is there an engaging first sentence?
Is it an interesting fact,
alarming statistic,
question,
quote,
story
Introduction: Is there any terminology you need defined sooner to better understand the discussion that follows?
Body: In which paragraphs has each of the thesis questions been answered?
1
2
3
Body: Evidence: Has evidence been given to back up the claims made the research paper?
Since the research paper is required to have four sources, you should find at least
four different sources
cited in APA style as in-text citations (also called parenthetical citations).
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Body: Evidence: What type of evidence is each of the above – data, studies, expert opinion?
Body: Evidence: Is there enough evidence given to be convincing? Could it be improved?
i.
How?
updated statistics, any statistics, an explanation for conflicting statistics
a quote from an expert,
a more credible source, a primary source,
a case history or example
Body: Evidence: Are the in-text citations done properly in APA style?
Were you able to easily match up the in-text citation with the first word(s) in the References page?
Body: Evidence: In each paragraph, does the writer explain how each piece of evidence is pertinent to the thesis? If not, where?
Remember paragraph structure:
i.
Topic sentence
ii.
Support sentences
iii.
Closing sentence to help integrate the information in the support sentences with the topic sentence
and with the paper’s thesis
.
Body: Evidence: Are there any in-text (parenthetical) citations missing for quotations, expert opinion or data? Where?
i.
Were there any citations given for paraphrasing? Where?
ii. Are there any claims made that don't have evidence for them? That are based solely on the writer's opinion?
Body: Evidence: Are the cited sources credible and convincing?
Do any of the quotations or opinions or data need a signal phrase
i.
to explain who the author is and why the author is credible
ii.
or where the data comes from?
Body: Is there a logical progression of ideas?
Did each idea help support the thesis, or is something missing that would help you better understand the writer’s points?
Are there transitions missing that would help you understand how an idea, paragra.
This is my end to end description of what Hypercube can do for clients.
This deck explains semantics from first principles in a non technical way, before showing how these principles may be applied in managing business semantics. Finally a number of routes to technical deployment of semantics (ontology) solutions are shown.
This was presented to a workshop of the American Accounting Association in San Francisco in August 2019
Organizational BehaviorThe field of organizational behavior ca.docxamit657720
Organizational Behavior
The field of organizational behavior can be organized around three levels: individual level, team level, and organizational level. In other words, some theories focus on factors influencing individual behavior (e.g., personality, motivation). Some theories focus on factors influencing team or group behaviors (e.g., group development, conflict, roles). Still other theories focus on factors that tend to operate at an organizational level (e.g., structure, culture, leadership).
During the course, you have studied a variety of theories and perspectives at all these levels. Which ones seem most meaningful to you?
For your last paper:
Select one theory or perspective that you have studied that seems to be an individual level theme. One that you have studied that seems to be a team level theme. And one that you have studied that seems to be an organizational level theme. Summarize what those theories are and why each pertains to its corresponding level (individual, team, or organization).
Analyze those three theories based on this question: Why do people do what they do in organizations? That is, how do the theories you have selected help explain "organizational behavior?"
What are the challenges, problems, or difficulties in behavior as suggested by each of your theories?
What are the potential strategies and solutions (to the challenges) as suggested by your theories?
How do your three theories seem to fit together? How do they seem to interact with each other? What important lessons can you derive from thinking about the interaction of the theories?
Submission Details:
Submit your answers in a 5 Microsoft Word document, using APA style.
Support your work with examples and research.
Name your document SU_MGT3002_W5_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
.
HT06, Position Paper, Tagging, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, ToRead, Pr...cameron
Presentation given at Hypertext 2006 in Odense, Denmark on classifying tagging systems. <a href="http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~cameron/cv/pubs/2006-ht06-tagging-paper">Full paper available here</a>.
Last But Not Least - Managing The Indexing ProcessFred Leise
Focused on editors and authors who need to understand how to deal with indexes as part of the publishing process. Includes indexing basics and best practices, as well as guides for managing the editor-author-indexer relationship.
3. IAR Questions What is invention? (What activities did the writer(s) have to engage in to create the text?) What is being invented? (What ideas, practices, arguments, etc. are created through the text?) What is being arranged? (What is being put in relation to what?) What is arrangement? (How are things being put in relation to one another?) What is being revised? (What is the writer(s) trying to change (e.g. what ideas, practices, etc.?)) What is revision? (What is the writer trying to change (e.g. what ideas, practices, etc.?)
6. Building the Logos One part argument : the claim alone Two part argument: the enthymeme Warrant (major premise) is implied Three part argument: Full Toulmin model
7. Building Blocks of Arguments: Values and Facts Values Facts Using sources Personal experience Testimony of others Authority
11. Establishing Ethos in Writing Intellectual Virtue of Reasonableness I am not an extremist I know the other side and they are wrong I see merit on the other side I concede one or more points to the other side I may be wrong, but…