Intelligent
design
Dr. Sanaei
Presenter:
Shaqayeq Mahmoudi
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word
was with God, and the Word was God
SINGLE CELL
UNICELLULAR
CHORDATA
LOBE FINNED
AMPHIBIA
REPTILE
John 1:1
Whether
ID is just another form of
creationism?
Whether
ID qualifies as science?
Whether
ID should be taught in public
schools?
Whether
the basic claim of ID is
correct??
Believe in GOD
Aquinas
1033 – 1109
William Paley
Michael J. Behe
Anselm
1225–1274 1743 – 1805
1952 (70)
Anselm
Aquinas
-monk
ontological argument
-priest
(1) argument from motion, (2) argument
from efficient cause, (3) argument from
necessary being(contingency),
(4) argument from gradations of
goodness(Degrees), and (5) argument
from design(Teleological argument)
Arguments
-British Christian philosopher
Popularizing Teleological argument
Arguments
William Paley
Teleology
Greek
Telos  end / purpose
Logos  study of
Teleological  purposeful
Arguments
William Paley
Using analogy
-Watchmaker argument
Analogy
Lemon ---- ---- > Citrus
Orange ---- ---- > Citrus
Ball ---- ---- > Citrus
Appearance
Arguments
William Paley
Using analogy
-Watchmaker argument
Cup ---- design & purpose ---- > Cup Maker
Watch ---- design & purpose ---- > Watch Maker
World ---- design & purpose ---- > World Maker
American biochemist
-Intelligent Design
Complexity
Arguments
Michael J. Behe
Intelligent Design
-Complex  Intelligent Designer
-Holy Books
-Complexity in Biological Mechanisms
-Natural Selection & Random Mutation
-Differences in ID Argument  Michael J. Behe
Michael Behe
Ironclad proof
GOD? DESIGNER?
Creationist's dream come true!
Professor of Biochemistry
At a respected university
Research scientist who does experiments
Awarded grants
Publishes papers in international science journals
Revived the hopes of the creationists!
Darwin’s Black Box,
the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. 1996
Extremely well written
Cleverly argued
Shows his obvious expertise in biochemistry
Most sophisticated attack on evolution to appear in recent years.
1) Darwinists are all wrong about evolution.
2) ID is one of the greatest achievements in the
history of science, rivaling the achievements of
Newton, Einstein and the others.
Michael Behe claims:
NAME-CALLING
● Pennock describes ID as follows:
“The last decade of the millennium saw the arrival of a
new player in the creation/evolution debate – the
intelligent design movement.”
● Barbara Forrest informs the reader that:
“Intelligent design theory is the most recent – and most
dangerous – manifestation of creationism.”
Does Survival of the fittest
lead to Nazism?!
• Philip Kitcher, bearing the sarcastic title:
“Born-Again Creationism.”
• Kenneth Miller starts his discussion of Behe’s book as follows:
“The heart and soul of Behe’s treatise against evolution is neither
new nor novel. It is the „argument from design,‟ the oldest and best
rhetorical weapon against evolution… Behe has dusted off the
argument from design, spiffed it up with the terminology of modern
biochemistry, and then applied it to the proteins and
macromolecular machines that run the living cell.”
William Paley
in 1803
A watch proves
the existence of a watchmaker
the extreme complexity of the universe proves
the existence of its Maker!
complex molecules, intricate crystals, vertex structure of type II superconductors, fractal symmetry, etc.
IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY
Extremely complex structures can
evolve gradually according to the
standard Darwinian mechanism for
evolution,
But not when
irreducible complexity is involved.
Evolution within the lowest levels of biological classification
might be purely Darwinian, but the origin of higher-level
groups requires designed mutations.
Darwinian evolution
HOMO
ERECTUS
HOMO
NEANDERTHALENSIS
HOMO SAPIENS
SAPIENS
HOMO
HABILIS
AUSTRALOPITHECUS
UNCONVINCING
REFUTATIONS OF ID
• Robert Dorit7:
“Many of the proteins of the eye lens, for example, began their careers doing
something completely different and unrelated to vision. Evolution is a
creative scavenger, taking what is available and putting it to new use. The
correct metaphor for the Darwinian process is not that of a First World
engineer, but that of a Third World auto mechanic who will get your car
running again, but only if the parts already lying around can be used for the
repair”.
• H. Allen Orr8 dismisses the above proposed refutation of ID:
“We might think that some of the parts of an irreducibly complex system
evolved step by step for some other purpose and were then recruited
wholesale to a new function [which is precisely what Dorit proposed]. But
this is unlikely. You may as well hope that half your car’s transmission will
suddenly help out in the airbag department. Such things might happen very,
very rarely, but they surely do not offer a general solution to irreducible
complexity.”
Bacteria
flagellum
HISTORICAL
PRECEDENTS FOR ID
Intelligent Design is not a new concept.
The dazzling sun, whose brilliance
provides the light, heat and energy
that makes life on earth possible,
seemed to have no explanation
other than the “sun god.”
Helios
Poseidon
Raging seas,
towering waves,
daily tides,
terrifying hurricanes
all these seemed to have no
possible explanation other
than the activities of the
“god of the seas.”
Why
does the earth itself not fall?
Intelligent Design
Intelligent Design  Pseudoscience  Supernatural Entity
 Scientific method
Pseudoscience : consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that claim
to be both scientific and factual but are incompatible with the scientific
method.
Rejecting ID
Behe  ID  Darwin’s Black Box  Irreducibly Complex  Evolution
Idesigner
Biological Traits  Function Poorly  Debilitate Bearers
Genome  Mutation/Pathways  ID
Theodicy
Theodicy  Theós : GOD Dik : Justice
-Dark side of natural theology
natural theology existence, intelligence, power,
and goodness of God  order and beauty of the
world
Human Suffering  Disease
Religion  Fall from Grace in the Garden of Eden
Biology  Natural selection & Random Mutation
Natural Theology
on the view of each organic being and each separate
organ having been specially created, how utterly
inexplicable it is that parts. . . should so frequently
bear the plain stamp of inutility.
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection
Darwin
The Human Genome
1900s  biochemical malfunctions  physical abnormalities
Archibald Garrod
-Inborn Errors of Metabolism 1909
-The Inborn Factors of Inherited Disease 1931
karma or malevolent demons
Fallible Design: Protein-Coding DNA
Sequences
Split Genes
1%  spliceosomes & conduct splicing
Alternative Splicing
Better Without Intron?
Introns  30-fold longer than exon & transcribed into premRNAs
+ Spliceosomes
Time & Energy
Bacteria & Mitochondria
Enough Space  Alternative Splicing
optimal genomic design? NO  1/3 Mutation  Intron-Exon Borders 
Cancer OR mRNA splicing  Neurodegenerative Diseases (e.g. ASL)
Intron Disease-Causing Agent
regulatory sequences  Gene Expression (When/Where)
promoters, enhancers, and silencers
Gene Regulation and Nucleic Acid Surveillance
Promotor  transcription factors  RNA Polymerase
Enhancers and Silencers  Coactivator & Pr  Activator and Repressor Pr
50 %
Gene Regulation and Nucleic Acid Surveillance
Energy & Material
Affordable Mechanism?
Posttranscriptional genetic regulation
20 Nucleotide
Complementary Sequences in mRNA  Inhibit the Translation
Micro-RNA
Micro-RNA
Energy & Material
Regulations  Often malfunction
DiGeorge syndrome Or Cancer
Affordable Mechanism?
16569 bp
37 Gene  22 tRNA / 13
PolyPeptide/ 2 rRNA
Oxidative Phosphorylation
 Respiratory Chain
4  mitochondrial and
nuclear genomes
mtDNA
IV: 3 Mitochondrion + Nuclear
Genome
II : Nuclear Genome
mtDNA
replication, transcription, translation, surveillance, or repair
mtDNA
degenerative diseases  Mutation in Mitochondria or nuclear-mitochondrial
interactions
O2 Radicals
Enough Space
Difference in Nuclear & Mitochondrial
Genome
Affordable Mechanism?
GOD?
THANKS!

Intelligent Design.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    In the beginningwas the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God SINGLE CELL UNICELLULAR CHORDATA LOBE FINNED AMPHIBIA REPTILE John 1:1
  • 3.
    Whether ID is justanother form of creationism? Whether ID qualifies as science? Whether ID should be taught in public schools? Whether the basic claim of ID is correct??
  • 4.
    Believe in GOD Aquinas 1033– 1109 William Paley Michael J. Behe Anselm 1225–1274 1743 – 1805 1952 (70)
  • 5.
    Anselm Aquinas -monk ontological argument -priest (1) argumentfrom motion, (2) argument from efficient cause, (3) argument from necessary being(contingency), (4) argument from gradations of goodness(Degrees), and (5) argument from design(Teleological argument) Arguments
  • 6.
    -British Christian philosopher PopularizingTeleological argument Arguments William Paley
  • 7.
    Teleology Greek Telos  end/ purpose Logos  study of Teleological  purposeful
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Analogy Lemon ---- ----> Citrus Orange ---- ---- > Citrus Ball ---- ---- > Citrus Appearance
  • 10.
    Arguments William Paley Using analogy -Watchmakerargument Cup ---- design & purpose ---- > Cup Maker Watch ---- design & purpose ---- > Watch Maker World ---- design & purpose ---- > World Maker
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Intelligent Design -Complex Intelligent Designer -Holy Books -Complexity in Biological Mechanisms -Natural Selection & Random Mutation -Differences in ID Argument  Michael J. Behe
  • 13.
    Michael Behe Ironclad proof GOD?DESIGNER? Creationist's dream come true! Professor of Biochemistry At a respected university Research scientist who does experiments Awarded grants Publishes papers in international science journals Revived the hopes of the creationists!
  • 14.
    Darwin’s Black Box, theBiochemical Challenge to Evolution. 1996 Extremely well written Cleverly argued Shows his obvious expertise in biochemistry Most sophisticated attack on evolution to appear in recent years.
  • 15.
    1) Darwinists areall wrong about evolution. 2) ID is one of the greatest achievements in the history of science, rivaling the achievements of Newton, Einstein and the others. Michael Behe claims:
  • 16.
    NAME-CALLING ● Pennock describesID as follows: “The last decade of the millennium saw the arrival of a new player in the creation/evolution debate – the intelligent design movement.” ● Barbara Forrest informs the reader that: “Intelligent design theory is the most recent – and most dangerous – manifestation of creationism.”
  • 17.
    Does Survival ofthe fittest lead to Nazism?!
  • 18.
    • Philip Kitcher,bearing the sarcastic title: “Born-Again Creationism.” • Kenneth Miller starts his discussion of Behe’s book as follows: “The heart and soul of Behe’s treatise against evolution is neither new nor novel. It is the „argument from design,‟ the oldest and best rhetorical weapon against evolution… Behe has dusted off the argument from design, spiffed it up with the terminology of modern biochemistry, and then applied it to the proteins and macromolecular machines that run the living cell.”
  • 19.
    William Paley in 1803 Awatch proves the existence of a watchmaker the extreme complexity of the universe proves the existence of its Maker! complex molecules, intricate crystals, vertex structure of type II superconductors, fractal symmetry, etc.
  • 20.
    IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY Extremely complexstructures can evolve gradually according to the standard Darwinian mechanism for evolution, But not when irreducible complexity is involved. Evolution within the lowest levels of biological classification might be purely Darwinian, but the origin of higher-level groups requires designed mutations.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    • Robert Dorit7: “Manyof the proteins of the eye lens, for example, began their careers doing something completely different and unrelated to vision. Evolution is a creative scavenger, taking what is available and putting it to new use. The correct metaphor for the Darwinian process is not that of a First World engineer, but that of a Third World auto mechanic who will get your car running again, but only if the parts already lying around can be used for the repair”. • H. Allen Orr8 dismisses the above proposed refutation of ID: “We might think that some of the parts of an irreducibly complex system evolved step by step for some other purpose and were then recruited wholesale to a new function [which is precisely what Dorit proposed]. But this is unlikely. You may as well hope that half your car’s transmission will suddenly help out in the airbag department. Such things might happen very, very rarely, but they surely do not offer a general solution to irreducible complexity.”
  • 24.
  • 25.
    HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS FOR ID IntelligentDesign is not a new concept.
  • 26.
    The dazzling sun,whose brilliance provides the light, heat and energy that makes life on earth possible, seemed to have no explanation other than the “sun god.” Helios Poseidon Raging seas, towering waves, daily tides, terrifying hurricanes all these seemed to have no possible explanation other than the activities of the “god of the seas.”
  • 27.
    Why does the earthitself not fall?
  • 28.
    Intelligent Design Intelligent Design Pseudoscience  Supernatural Entity  Scientific method Pseudoscience : consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that claim to be both scientific and factual but are incompatible with the scientific method.
  • 29.
    Rejecting ID Behe ID  Darwin’s Black Box  Irreducibly Complex  Evolution Idesigner Biological Traits  Function Poorly  Debilitate Bearers Genome  Mutation/Pathways  ID
  • 30.
    Theodicy Theodicy  Theós: GOD Dik : Justice -Dark side of natural theology natural theology existence, intelligence, power, and goodness of God  order and beauty of the world Human Suffering  Disease Religion  Fall from Grace in the Garden of Eden Biology  Natural selection & Random Mutation
  • 31.
    Natural Theology on theview of each organic being and each separate organ having been specially created, how utterly inexplicable it is that parts. . . should so frequently bear the plain stamp of inutility. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection Darwin
  • 32.
  • 33.
    1900s  biochemicalmalfunctions  physical abnormalities Archibald Garrod -Inborn Errors of Metabolism 1909 -The Inborn Factors of Inherited Disease 1931 karma or malevolent demons Fallible Design: Protein-Coding DNA Sequences
  • 34.
    Split Genes 1% spliceosomes & conduct splicing
  • 35.
  • 36.
    Better Without Intron? Introns 30-fold longer than exon & transcribed into premRNAs + Spliceosomes Time & Energy Bacteria & Mitochondria Enough Space  Alternative Splicing optimal genomic design? NO  1/3 Mutation  Intron-Exon Borders  Cancer OR mRNA splicing  Neurodegenerative Diseases (e.g. ASL) Intron Disease-Causing Agent
  • 37.
    regulatory sequences Gene Expression (When/Where) promoters, enhancers, and silencers Gene Regulation and Nucleic Acid Surveillance
  • 38.
    Promotor  transcriptionfactors  RNA Polymerase Enhancers and Silencers  Coactivator & Pr  Activator and Repressor Pr 50 % Gene Regulation and Nucleic Acid Surveillance
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Posttranscriptional genetic regulation 20Nucleotide Complementary Sequences in mRNA  Inhibit the Translation Micro-RNA
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Energy & Material Regulations Often malfunction DiGeorge syndrome Or Cancer Affordable Mechanism?
  • 43.
    16569 bp 37 Gene 22 tRNA / 13 PolyPeptide/ 2 rRNA Oxidative Phosphorylation  Respiratory Chain 4  mitochondrial and nuclear genomes mtDNA
  • 44.
    IV: 3 Mitochondrion+ Nuclear Genome II : Nuclear Genome mtDNA
  • 45.
    replication, transcription, translation,surveillance, or repair mtDNA
  • 46.
    degenerative diseases Mutation in Mitochondria or nuclear-mitochondrial interactions O2 Radicals Enough Space Difference in Nuclear & Mitochondrial Genome Affordable Mechanism?
  • 47.
  • 48.