Insanity
•
3 likes•373 views
The document discusses a "defect of reason" caused by a disease of the mind which affects a person's ability to reason. It notes that confusion alone is not enough and there needs to be a total inability to reason or know that one's act is wrong. It also states that the internal cause does not have to be a disease of the brain, but anything that affects one's ability to reason or know what they are doing is wrong.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973: Financial factors
The document discusses UK laws governing finances in divorce cases, including the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and related case law. It outlines the courts' powers to approve and change the financial positions of parties upon divorce. It describes the factors courts must consider under section 25 of the MCA 1973, such as the financial resources and needs of the parties, the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage, and the conduct of the parties. Case law is discussed that provides guidance on applying these statutory factors.
Judicial Separation in England and Wales
An applicant for legal separation must prove one of five facts under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to be granted a separation. A legal separation and divorce have similar effects, including preventing inheritance, ending cohabitation obligations, and allowing financial relief. If divorce is barred, one can pursue legal separation instead within the first year of marriage by proving any of the five facts, without needing to show an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. A legal separation can result in financial orders, maintenance obligations, an end to cohabitation, barring inheritance, and the potential for reconciliation if remarriage is prohibited.
Online Learning: Continuous Enhancement and Improvement
The role of a Programme Lead in the continuous enhancement and improvement of the student experience in an online education setting.
Indirect intention
This document discusses the legal principles of oblique intent in criminal cases. It outlines several important court cases that have helped define how intent can be established through foreseeability of consequences:
- DPP v Smith established that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of their actions.
- Hyam v DPP found that intent exists when a person foresees a consequence as being highly probable due to their actions.
- More recent cases like Nedrick, Woolin, and Matthews and Alleyne have confirmed that a jury can only find intent if the consequence was virtually certain and the defendant appreciated this, establishing foreseeability of consequences as a rule of evidence for intent.
Actus reus
This document defines and discusses the legal concept of actus reus. It begins by defining actus reus using four sources of authority as the physical act of the crime, an act, a failure to act (omission), or a "state of affairs". It then describes actus reus as generally requiring a positive act, with an exception for cases like R v Larsonneur that involve a state of affairs. Finally, it explains five situations in which an omission may amount to actus reus: 1) when a legal duty exists, such as the duty of parents to care for children; 2) when a duty arises from a relationship; 3) when a duty arises from undertaking someone's care; 4
Causation and drugs cases
This document summarizes several cases related to causation and drugs:
- R v Cato established that administering a noxious substance that causes death is an offence under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act.
- R v Dalby rejected prosecution for death caused by illegally supplying drugs, as the supply did not directly cause death.
- R v Khan suggested non-action could establish liability if there is a duty to summon medical help in an overdose situation.
- R v Evans upheld conviction for gross negligence manslaughter when the appellant supplied heroin to her sister, recognized the sister's overdose symptoms, but failed to seek medical help, causing her death.
Civil Partnerships in England and Wales
Civil partnerships allow same-sex couples to legally recognize their relationship, equivalent to marriage. Partners obtain property rights, inheritance, and pension benefits. To end a civil partnership, one must apply for dissolution after one year, which deals with financial and property settlements similarly to divorce. Grounds for dissolution include irretrievable breakdown, two years living apart by consent, or five years living apart. Nullity or separation orders are also possible under certain conditions.
Criminal damage
The document discusses criminal damage offenses under the Criminal Damage Act 1971. It outlines the 3 offenses as basic criminal damage, aggravated criminal damage, and arson as defined in Section 1 of the Act. For basic criminal damage, the 3 elements that must be proven are: 1) destruction or damage, 2) to property, and 3) belonging to another. Damage is broadly defined based on case law. Aggravated criminal damage requires the additional element of intending or recklessly endangering life. Defenses to criminal damage are also provided in Section 5 of the Act.
Recommended
Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973: Financial factors
The document discusses UK laws governing finances in divorce cases, including the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and related case law. It outlines the courts' powers to approve and change the financial positions of parties upon divorce. It describes the factors courts must consider under section 25 of the MCA 1973, such as the financial resources and needs of the parties, the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage, and the conduct of the parties. Case law is discussed that provides guidance on applying these statutory factors.
Judicial Separation in England and Wales
An applicant for legal separation must prove one of five facts under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to be granted a separation. A legal separation and divorce have similar effects, including preventing inheritance, ending cohabitation obligations, and allowing financial relief. If divorce is barred, one can pursue legal separation instead within the first year of marriage by proving any of the five facts, without needing to show an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. A legal separation can result in financial orders, maintenance obligations, an end to cohabitation, barring inheritance, and the potential for reconciliation if remarriage is prohibited.
Online Learning: Continuous Enhancement and Improvement
The role of a Programme Lead in the continuous enhancement and improvement of the student experience in an online education setting.
Indirect intention
This document discusses the legal principles of oblique intent in criminal cases. It outlines several important court cases that have helped define how intent can be established through foreseeability of consequences:
- DPP v Smith established that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of their actions.
- Hyam v DPP found that intent exists when a person foresees a consequence as being highly probable due to their actions.
- More recent cases like Nedrick, Woolin, and Matthews and Alleyne have confirmed that a jury can only find intent if the consequence was virtually certain and the defendant appreciated this, establishing foreseeability of consequences as a rule of evidence for intent.
Actus reus
This document defines and discusses the legal concept of actus reus. It begins by defining actus reus using four sources of authority as the physical act of the crime, an act, a failure to act (omission), or a "state of affairs". It then describes actus reus as generally requiring a positive act, with an exception for cases like R v Larsonneur that involve a state of affairs. Finally, it explains five situations in which an omission may amount to actus reus: 1) when a legal duty exists, such as the duty of parents to care for children; 2) when a duty arises from a relationship; 3) when a duty arises from undertaking someone's care; 4
Causation and drugs cases
This document summarizes several cases related to causation and drugs:
- R v Cato established that administering a noxious substance that causes death is an offence under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act.
- R v Dalby rejected prosecution for death caused by illegally supplying drugs, as the supply did not directly cause death.
- R v Khan suggested non-action could establish liability if there is a duty to summon medical help in an overdose situation.
- R v Evans upheld conviction for gross negligence manslaughter when the appellant supplied heroin to her sister, recognized the sister's overdose symptoms, but failed to seek medical help, causing her death.
Civil Partnerships in England and Wales
Civil partnerships allow same-sex couples to legally recognize their relationship, equivalent to marriage. Partners obtain property rights, inheritance, and pension benefits. To end a civil partnership, one must apply for dissolution after one year, which deals with financial and property settlements similarly to divorce. Grounds for dissolution include irretrievable breakdown, two years living apart by consent, or five years living apart. Nullity or separation orders are also possible under certain conditions.
Criminal damage
The document discusses criminal damage offenses under the Criminal Damage Act 1971. It outlines the 3 offenses as basic criminal damage, aggravated criminal damage, and arson as defined in Section 1 of the Act. For basic criminal damage, the 3 elements that must be proven are: 1) destruction or damage, 2) to property, and 3) belonging to another. Damage is broadly defined based on case law. Aggravated criminal damage requires the additional element of intending or recklessly endangering life. Defenses to criminal damage are also provided in Section 5 of the Act.
Criminal Law: Intoxication
This document summarizes several cases related to the defense of intoxication in criminal law. It establishes that voluntary intoxication generally cannot be used as a defense, as drunken intent is still considered intent. However, if a defendant was intoxicated to the point of lacking the necessary mental state or mens rea for the crime, intoxication could provide a defense for crimes requiring specific intent but not crimes of basic intent or manslaughter. Subsequent cases further clarified that mistakes due to intoxication cannot be relied on as a defense and that involuntary intoxication is also not a valid defense.
Criminal Law: Diminished Responsibility
This document outlines the four elements of the diminished responsibility defense in criminal cases in the UK: 1) the defendant had an abnormality of mental functioning, 2) the abnormality was a recognized medical condition, 3) the abnormality substantially impaired the defendant's ability to understand their actions, and 4) the abnormality provides an explanation for why the defendant carried out the killing. Case law has established that the impairment does not need to be total and is determined by a jury to be something between total and trivial or minimal. The abnormality and impaired state of mind must also be present at the time of the alleged killing.
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
This document discusses several court cases related to public policy and psychiatric injury from tort cases. It establishes that courts now have the power to consider public policy implications when imposing liability. One case did not impose liability on police who failed to act on a warning about a teacher who later killed a student, though this was later challenged. The standard for primary victims claiming psychiatric injuries was that injuries must be reasonably foreseeable, and secondary victims must meet four criteria including witnessing the incident and having a close relationship to the primary victim.
Tort Law: Causation
This document discusses several legal cases related to causation in tort law. It covers topics such as: factual causation tests like the "but for" test; multiple causes of harm where a defendant's actions contributed materially to the damage; intervening acts that may break the chain of causation; the thin skull rule where defendants must take victims as they find them; and the test that the harm suffered must be reasonably foreseeable to be recoverable.
Costs
The document discusses various aspects of costs in UK civil litigation, including:
- The general rule that costs follow the event, but the court has discretion based on circumstances.
- Reforms introduced by LASPOA 2012, including the qualified one-way costs shifting for personal injury claims, proportionality requirements, costs budgets, fixed costs for certain claims, and provisional detailed assessments.
- The procedures for summary assessment of costs at the end of fast track trials, and detailed assessment of costs in multi-track cases, including points of dispute processes.
- The standard and indemnity bases of assessment and wasted costs orders against lawyers.
Financing litigation
This document discusses various methods for financing civil litigation in England and Wales, including retainers, contingency fees (CFAs), damages-based agreements (DBAs), insurance, qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS), and public funding. It provides details on reforms introduced by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, such as success fees and ATE premiums no longer being recoverable from the losing party. CFAs and DBAs are now the main alternatives to traditional retainers, with caps on the percentage of damages that can be claimed. Public funding through legal aid has limited availability and alternative options may include trade union support.
Unfair dismissal
This document discusses unfair dismissal, including:
- 4 types of dismissal: fair, unfair, wrongful, constructive
- What constitutes unfair dismissal, including dismissal for a potentially fair reason without following fair procedure
- 4 automatically unfair reasons for dismissal relating to pregnancy, family reasons, representation, pay and hours
- 5 potentially fair reasons for dismissal under UK law: conduct, capability, redundancy, statutory restriction, other substantial reasons
- The 5 preliminary requirements for an unfair dismissal claim: 1 year continuous service, employee was dismissed, claim brought on time, not an excluded category, effective date of termination
English Legal System
This document discusses the definition of law according to five academics and classifies law into seven main categories. It defines law as a body of rules fixed and enforced by a sovereign authority according to John Austin, and as a system of rules according to Professor Hart. Law can also be seen as an embodiment of reason (Plato) or a tool of control (Marxist theory). The seven classifications of law covered are domestic, European, international, public, private, civil, and criminal law.
Delegated Legislation: Substantive ultra vires
The document discusses the concept of substantive ultra vires, which allows courts to intervene when public authorities abuse their powers by creating laws illegally or unreasonably. It provides examples of cases where authorities have overstepped their powers, such as giving a government department more authority than Parliament or forcing people to remove snow when they lacked that authority. Courts can review delegated legislation for unreasonable acts under the concept of substantive ultra vires.
Delegated Legislation: Procedural Ultra Vires
Procedural ultra vires occurs when a public authority exceeds its powers by failing to follow mandatory procedural requirements in its enabling act. Case law has established that statutory instruments will be invalidated if mandatory consultation or publication requirements are not followed, but not if the procedures are only directory. For example, in R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment, a statutory instrument setting teacher pay conditions was ruled ultra vires for failing to follow the powers granted by the enabling act.
Directives and Direct Effect Memory Game
The EU issues directives that set goals for member states but allow flexibility in how they are achieved. Directives have direct effect, meaning individuals can rely on them in court if the state fails to properly implement them. Directives aim to harmonize laws across the EU in order to facilitate the functioning of the single market.
Directives and direct effect
Directives issued by the EU are binding on Member States and must be implemented within a strict time limit. Once implemented, individuals can rely on directives through direct effect. There are two types of direct effect: horizontal between citizens, and vertical against the state. Unimplemented directives can still be directly effective against emanations of the state like local authorities through vertical direct effect. Private companies are not considered emanations of the state so individuals cannot rely on unimplemented directives against them. National courts must interpret national law in line with directives whether implemented or not through the principle of indirect effect.
Contract Case Law: Acceptance
This document summarizes several contract law cases related to acceptance of offers. It discusses cases where purported acceptances were found to be counteroffers, where acceptance was not communicated, where the acceptance needed to be a specific form, and where the accepting party did not have authority. It also covers cases where acceptance was found through conduct instead of words, acceptance of unilateral offers is completed through action, and establishes the postal rule that acceptance is effective upon posting.
Contract Case law: Offer
This document summarizes several contract case law rulings related to offers:
1) R v Clarke and Taylor v Laird established that for an offer to be accepted, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer and intend to accept it at the time of the alleged acceptance.
2) Partridge v Crittenden, P.S.G.B. v Boots Chemists, Fisher v Bell, and Harvey v Facey ruled that shop displays and advertisements are invitations to treat, not offers, which can be revoked before acceptance.
3) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co established that advertisements can constitute unilateral offers in exceptional cases.
Theft Case Law
This document summarizes several theft case laws related to the concept of appropriation:
- Lawrence (1971) established that taking money with consent could still be appropriation.
- Eddy v Niman (1971) found no appropriation when goods were placed in a store's trolley as this was consistent with the owner's rights.
- McPherson (1973) ruled that placing bottles in a bag showed intent to steal, amounting to appropriation.
- Skipp (1975) determined appropriation occurred when goods were loaded and the route changed, not just upon intending to steal.
- R v Morris (1983) found appropriation as soon as price labels were switched.
Theft: Appropriation and consent
The document discusses several court cases related to the definition of theft and appropriation. It notes that in some cases such as Lawrence (1971), taking property with consent was still considered appropriation. However, in other cases such as Fritschy (1985) and Gallasso (1993), taking property with the owner's permission did not amount to appropriation in the legal sense of theft. The document analyzes how the legal concept of appropriation has been applied inconsistently depending on the specific case and jurisdiction.
Theft: Appropriation Common Law Development
This document discusses the legal development of the concept of appropriation as it relates to theft. It summarizes several key court cases between 1971 and 1993 that helped define when appropriation occurs. The cases established that appropriation can take place before an item is removed from the store if the person's actions are inconsistent with the owner's rights, such as switching price tags or loading goods with the intent to steal them and divert them from their destination. Appropriation requires an act that assumes the rights of ownership over an item.
Robbery Case Names
This document appears to list legal cases related to robbery from 1976 to 1995. It includes 6 cases: Robinson (1977), Corcoran v Anderton (1980), Dawson and James (1976), Clouden (1987), Hale (1979), and Lockley (1995). The document provides a high-level listing of legal cases but no other context or details about the cases themselves.
Juries in the criminal courts
Juries play an important role in criminal cases in Crown Court, where 12 jurors listen to evidence and the judge's summing up before deciding in secret whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty by majority verdict to prevent jury interference.
Juries in civil cases
Juries play a role in deciding certain civil cases such as defamation, false imprisonment, and fraud that involve issues of character and reputation. However, judges can refuse juries even in these cases if the evidence is too complicated. Juries are allowed in personal injury cases in exceptional circumstances according to Ward v James, but none have been deemed exceptional since. In civil cases juries have a dual role in deciding liability and assessing damages to be awarded.
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
"How to make and deliver dynamic presentations by making it more interactive to captivate your audience attention"
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
More Related Content
More from Kirsty Allison
Criminal Law: Intoxication
This document summarizes several cases related to the defense of intoxication in criminal law. It establishes that voluntary intoxication generally cannot be used as a defense, as drunken intent is still considered intent. However, if a defendant was intoxicated to the point of lacking the necessary mental state or mens rea for the crime, intoxication could provide a defense for crimes requiring specific intent but not crimes of basic intent or manslaughter. Subsequent cases further clarified that mistakes due to intoxication cannot be relied on as a defense and that involuntary intoxication is also not a valid defense.
Criminal Law: Diminished Responsibility
This document outlines the four elements of the diminished responsibility defense in criminal cases in the UK: 1) the defendant had an abnormality of mental functioning, 2) the abnormality was a recognized medical condition, 3) the abnormality substantially impaired the defendant's ability to understand their actions, and 4) the abnormality provides an explanation for why the defendant carried out the killing. Case law has established that the impairment does not need to be total and is determined by a jury to be something between total and trivial or minimal. The abnormality and impaired state of mind must also be present at the time of the alleged killing.
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
This document discusses several court cases related to public policy and psychiatric injury from tort cases. It establishes that courts now have the power to consider public policy implications when imposing liability. One case did not impose liability on police who failed to act on a warning about a teacher who later killed a student, though this was later challenged. The standard for primary victims claiming psychiatric injuries was that injuries must be reasonably foreseeable, and secondary victims must meet four criteria including witnessing the incident and having a close relationship to the primary victim.
Tort Law: Causation
This document discusses several legal cases related to causation in tort law. It covers topics such as: factual causation tests like the "but for" test; multiple causes of harm where a defendant's actions contributed materially to the damage; intervening acts that may break the chain of causation; the thin skull rule where defendants must take victims as they find them; and the test that the harm suffered must be reasonably foreseeable to be recoverable.
Costs
The document discusses various aspects of costs in UK civil litigation, including:
- The general rule that costs follow the event, but the court has discretion based on circumstances.
- Reforms introduced by LASPOA 2012, including the qualified one-way costs shifting for personal injury claims, proportionality requirements, costs budgets, fixed costs for certain claims, and provisional detailed assessments.
- The procedures for summary assessment of costs at the end of fast track trials, and detailed assessment of costs in multi-track cases, including points of dispute processes.
- The standard and indemnity bases of assessment and wasted costs orders against lawyers.
Financing litigation
This document discusses various methods for financing civil litigation in England and Wales, including retainers, contingency fees (CFAs), damages-based agreements (DBAs), insurance, qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS), and public funding. It provides details on reforms introduced by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, such as success fees and ATE premiums no longer being recoverable from the losing party. CFAs and DBAs are now the main alternatives to traditional retainers, with caps on the percentage of damages that can be claimed. Public funding through legal aid has limited availability and alternative options may include trade union support.
Unfair dismissal
This document discusses unfair dismissal, including:
- 4 types of dismissal: fair, unfair, wrongful, constructive
- What constitutes unfair dismissal, including dismissal for a potentially fair reason without following fair procedure
- 4 automatically unfair reasons for dismissal relating to pregnancy, family reasons, representation, pay and hours
- 5 potentially fair reasons for dismissal under UK law: conduct, capability, redundancy, statutory restriction, other substantial reasons
- The 5 preliminary requirements for an unfair dismissal claim: 1 year continuous service, employee was dismissed, claim brought on time, not an excluded category, effective date of termination
English Legal System
This document discusses the definition of law according to five academics and classifies law into seven main categories. It defines law as a body of rules fixed and enforced by a sovereign authority according to John Austin, and as a system of rules according to Professor Hart. Law can also be seen as an embodiment of reason (Plato) or a tool of control (Marxist theory). The seven classifications of law covered are domestic, European, international, public, private, civil, and criminal law.
Delegated Legislation: Substantive ultra vires
The document discusses the concept of substantive ultra vires, which allows courts to intervene when public authorities abuse their powers by creating laws illegally or unreasonably. It provides examples of cases where authorities have overstepped their powers, such as giving a government department more authority than Parliament or forcing people to remove snow when they lacked that authority. Courts can review delegated legislation for unreasonable acts under the concept of substantive ultra vires.
Delegated Legislation: Procedural Ultra Vires
Procedural ultra vires occurs when a public authority exceeds its powers by failing to follow mandatory procedural requirements in its enabling act. Case law has established that statutory instruments will be invalidated if mandatory consultation or publication requirements are not followed, but not if the procedures are only directory. For example, in R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment, a statutory instrument setting teacher pay conditions was ruled ultra vires for failing to follow the powers granted by the enabling act.
Directives and Direct Effect Memory Game
The EU issues directives that set goals for member states but allow flexibility in how they are achieved. Directives have direct effect, meaning individuals can rely on them in court if the state fails to properly implement them. Directives aim to harmonize laws across the EU in order to facilitate the functioning of the single market.
Directives and direct effect
Directives issued by the EU are binding on Member States and must be implemented within a strict time limit. Once implemented, individuals can rely on directives through direct effect. There are two types of direct effect: horizontal between citizens, and vertical against the state. Unimplemented directives can still be directly effective against emanations of the state like local authorities through vertical direct effect. Private companies are not considered emanations of the state so individuals cannot rely on unimplemented directives against them. National courts must interpret national law in line with directives whether implemented or not through the principle of indirect effect.
Contract Case Law: Acceptance
This document summarizes several contract law cases related to acceptance of offers. It discusses cases where purported acceptances were found to be counteroffers, where acceptance was not communicated, where the acceptance needed to be a specific form, and where the accepting party did not have authority. It also covers cases where acceptance was found through conduct instead of words, acceptance of unilateral offers is completed through action, and establishes the postal rule that acceptance is effective upon posting.
Contract Case law: Offer
This document summarizes several contract case law rulings related to offers:
1) R v Clarke and Taylor v Laird established that for an offer to be accepted, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer and intend to accept it at the time of the alleged acceptance.
2) Partridge v Crittenden, P.S.G.B. v Boots Chemists, Fisher v Bell, and Harvey v Facey ruled that shop displays and advertisements are invitations to treat, not offers, which can be revoked before acceptance.
3) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co established that advertisements can constitute unilateral offers in exceptional cases.
Theft Case Law
This document summarizes several theft case laws related to the concept of appropriation:
- Lawrence (1971) established that taking money with consent could still be appropriation.
- Eddy v Niman (1971) found no appropriation when goods were placed in a store's trolley as this was consistent with the owner's rights.
- McPherson (1973) ruled that placing bottles in a bag showed intent to steal, amounting to appropriation.
- Skipp (1975) determined appropriation occurred when goods were loaded and the route changed, not just upon intending to steal.
- R v Morris (1983) found appropriation as soon as price labels were switched.
Theft: Appropriation and consent
The document discusses several court cases related to the definition of theft and appropriation. It notes that in some cases such as Lawrence (1971), taking property with consent was still considered appropriation. However, in other cases such as Fritschy (1985) and Gallasso (1993), taking property with the owner's permission did not amount to appropriation in the legal sense of theft. The document analyzes how the legal concept of appropriation has been applied inconsistently depending on the specific case and jurisdiction.
Theft: Appropriation Common Law Development
This document discusses the legal development of the concept of appropriation as it relates to theft. It summarizes several key court cases between 1971 and 1993 that helped define when appropriation occurs. The cases established that appropriation can take place before an item is removed from the store if the person's actions are inconsistent with the owner's rights, such as switching price tags or loading goods with the intent to steal them and divert them from their destination. Appropriation requires an act that assumes the rights of ownership over an item.
Robbery Case Names
This document appears to list legal cases related to robbery from 1976 to 1995. It includes 6 cases: Robinson (1977), Corcoran v Anderton (1980), Dawson and James (1976), Clouden (1987), Hale (1979), and Lockley (1995). The document provides a high-level listing of legal cases but no other context or details about the cases themselves.
Juries in the criminal courts
Juries play an important role in criminal cases in Crown Court, where 12 jurors listen to evidence and the judge's summing up before deciding in secret whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty by majority verdict to prevent jury interference.
Juries in civil cases
Juries play a role in deciding certain civil cases such as defamation, false imprisonment, and fraud that involve issues of character and reputation. However, judges can refuse juries even in these cases if the evidence is too complicated. Juries are allowed in personal injury cases in exceptional circumstances according to Ward v James, but none have been deemed exceptional since. In civil cases juries have a dual role in deciding liability and assessing damages to be awarded.
More from Kirsty Allison (20)
Recently uploaded
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
"How to make and deliver dynamic presentations by making it more interactive to captivate your audience attention"
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qhtvq32h4ybf9t49ku85x0n3xl4jhr15The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience Wahiba Chair Training & Consulting
Wahiba Chair's Talk at the 2024 Learning Ideas Conference. Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdBeyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Recently uploaded (20)
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Insanity
- 2. A Defect of Reason
- 3. Caused by a disease of the mind L
- 4. Which effects a persons ability to reason
- 5. Clarke
- 6. Confusion not enough total inability to reason or know act is not wrong or
- 7. Kemp
- 8. Internal cause does not have to be a disease of the brain just anything that effects D ability to reason or know what he does is wrong Pacino NO L