Is making the conclusion of contracts for the provision of broadband internet...Michal
In its preliminary ruling delivered on 11 March 2010, the Court of Justice had
yet another opportunity, after the VTB-VAB and Galatea cases1, to express its views
on the legality of national legislation prohibiting combined sales (that is bundling
and tying). The preliminary question arose in a dispute between Telekomunikacja
Polska SA (hereafter TP SA), the Polish incumbent telecoms operator, and the
UKE President (in Polish: Urząd Komunikacji Elektronicznej; herefater, UKE),
the Polish national regulatory authority (NRA) responsible for the telecoms field.
The original case concerned the conditions for the provision of broadband internet
access services, ‘Neostrada TP’ by TP SA. According to Article 57(1)(1) of the Polish
Telecommunications Law of 2004 (in Polish: Prawo Telekomunikacyjne; hereafter,
PT)2 ‘A service provider may not make the conclusion of a contract for the provision
of publicly available telecommunications services, including connection to a public
telecommunications network, conditional upon the conclusion by the end-user of
a contract for the provision of other services (…)’
IOM Helsinki: ACCESS EU-wide seminar 13 May 2015 - PresentationACCESS Helsinki
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) organized an EU-wide seminar of the European Commission-funded project entitled “Active Citizenship: Enhancing Political Participation of Migrant Youth” (ACCESS), which IOM Helsinki has implemented during 2013-2015 in cooperation with partners in Czech Republic, Finland, France, Romania and Spain.
The purpose of the EU-wide seminar was to disseminate the project results, in terms of how the project has contributed to the capacity building of migrant youth and partner municipalities involved. Furthermore, the seminar gave insights gained through the Peer Review’s conducted and launch the Online Self-Assessment Tool and the Discussion Paper produced by the project.
Is making the conclusion of contracts for the provision of broadband internet...Michal
In its preliminary ruling delivered on 11 March 2010, the Court of Justice had
yet another opportunity, after the VTB-VAB and Galatea cases1, to express its views
on the legality of national legislation prohibiting combined sales (that is bundling
and tying). The preliminary question arose in a dispute between Telekomunikacja
Polska SA (hereafter TP SA), the Polish incumbent telecoms operator, and the
UKE President (in Polish: Urząd Komunikacji Elektronicznej; herefater, UKE),
the Polish national regulatory authority (NRA) responsible for the telecoms field.
The original case concerned the conditions for the provision of broadband internet
access services, ‘Neostrada TP’ by TP SA. According to Article 57(1)(1) of the Polish
Telecommunications Law of 2004 (in Polish: Prawo Telekomunikacyjne; hereafter,
PT)2 ‘A service provider may not make the conclusion of a contract for the provision
of publicly available telecommunications services, including connection to a public
telecommunications network, conditional upon the conclusion by the end-user of
a contract for the provision of other services (…)’
IOM Helsinki: ACCESS EU-wide seminar 13 May 2015 - PresentationACCESS Helsinki
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) organized an EU-wide seminar of the European Commission-funded project entitled “Active Citizenship: Enhancing Political Participation of Migrant Youth” (ACCESS), which IOM Helsinki has implemented during 2013-2015 in cooperation with partners in Czech Republic, Finland, France, Romania and Spain.
The purpose of the EU-wide seminar was to disseminate the project results, in terms of how the project has contributed to the capacity building of migrant youth and partner municipalities involved. Furthermore, the seminar gave insights gained through the Peer Review’s conducted and launch the Online Self-Assessment Tool and the Discussion Paper produced by the project.