I do not have an opinion on Chief Justice Corona's guilt or innocence. As a summary, my role is to objectively outline the key points of the document without making judgments.
This document provides an overview of the US legal system. It discusses how the system aims to provide security, predictability, and enforce societal values through substantive and procedural law. It also outlines different types of crimes and offenses, as well as how cases are handled in state and federal court systems from trial courts up to the US Supreme Court. The nomination and confirmation process for Supreme Court justices is also summarized.
The U.S. court system is triangular with many trial courts at the bottom, fewer appeals courts in the middle, and a supreme court at the top at both the federal and state levels. Trial courts determine facts and apply the law, while appellate courts review trials for legal errors. The U.S. Supreme Court mainly hears appeals involving constitutional issues or disagreements between circuit courts. Specialized courts exist at both federal and state levels to handle specific areas like bankruptcy, tax, or juvenile cases. Jurisdiction and venue determine where a case can be properly filed and heard.
What's the difference between the federal and state court systems? Criminal and civil cases? Constitutional, statutory and administrative law? This brief overview hits the highlights.
This document defines judicial review and discusses its application in different countries. It also examines the merits and demerits of judicial review. Judicial review refers to a court examining the constitutionality of laws, executive actions, or judicial proceedings. The document outlines the powers of judicial review for high courts and supreme courts in Pakistan under Articles 184 and 199 of the constitution. It also lists the objectives as learning about the concept of judicial review, its application through sue moto powers and various articles, and the merits of judicial review such as protecting constitutional rights and separating governmental powers, as well as the potential demerits like becoming undemocratic or leading to an autocratic judiciary.
This document discusses the rule against bias in administrative law. It defines several types of bias that can affect an administrative authority's impartiality, including personal bias from relationships with parties, pecuniary bias from financial interests, subject matter bias, departmental bias, preconceived notion bias, and bias due to obstinacy. Personal bias occurs when a relationship inclines the authority favorably or unfavorably towards a party. Pecuniary bias involves any financial interest, however small, related to the parties. The principles of natural justice require that justice be done and be seen to be done impartially.
The document summarizes the structure and powers of the US judicial system. It describes how the Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal court system and the Supreme Court's power of judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison. It also explains the hierarchy of courts, from US District Courts to Courts of Appeals to the Supreme Court, and how cases progress through this system. The roles of the Chief Justice and Solicitor General in Supreme Court decision-making are also outlined.
The document discusses the role and powers of the federal courts, particularly the Supreme Court, in American government. It notes that the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, allowing it to act as a lawmaking body by interpreting statutes and the Constitution. It also discusses how Supreme Court decisions are influenced by the philosophies of its members and cases that come before it. Additionally, it provides an overview of the judicial process, jurisdiction of federal courts, appointment of justices, and limitations on the courts' powers.
This document provides an overview of the US legal system. It discusses how the system aims to provide security, predictability, and enforce societal values through substantive and procedural law. It also outlines different types of crimes and offenses, as well as how cases are handled in state and federal court systems from trial courts up to the US Supreme Court. The nomination and confirmation process for Supreme Court justices is also summarized.
The U.S. court system is triangular with many trial courts at the bottom, fewer appeals courts in the middle, and a supreme court at the top at both the federal and state levels. Trial courts determine facts and apply the law, while appellate courts review trials for legal errors. The U.S. Supreme Court mainly hears appeals involving constitutional issues or disagreements between circuit courts. Specialized courts exist at both federal and state levels to handle specific areas like bankruptcy, tax, or juvenile cases. Jurisdiction and venue determine where a case can be properly filed and heard.
What's the difference between the federal and state court systems? Criminal and civil cases? Constitutional, statutory and administrative law? This brief overview hits the highlights.
This document defines judicial review and discusses its application in different countries. It also examines the merits and demerits of judicial review. Judicial review refers to a court examining the constitutionality of laws, executive actions, or judicial proceedings. The document outlines the powers of judicial review for high courts and supreme courts in Pakistan under Articles 184 and 199 of the constitution. It also lists the objectives as learning about the concept of judicial review, its application through sue moto powers and various articles, and the merits of judicial review such as protecting constitutional rights and separating governmental powers, as well as the potential demerits like becoming undemocratic or leading to an autocratic judiciary.
This document discusses the rule against bias in administrative law. It defines several types of bias that can affect an administrative authority's impartiality, including personal bias from relationships with parties, pecuniary bias from financial interests, subject matter bias, departmental bias, preconceived notion bias, and bias due to obstinacy. Personal bias occurs when a relationship inclines the authority favorably or unfavorably towards a party. Pecuniary bias involves any financial interest, however small, related to the parties. The principles of natural justice require that justice be done and be seen to be done impartially.
The document summarizes the structure and powers of the US judicial system. It describes how the Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal court system and the Supreme Court's power of judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison. It also explains the hierarchy of courts, from US District Courts to Courts of Appeals to the Supreme Court, and how cases progress through this system. The roles of the Chief Justice and Solicitor General in Supreme Court decision-making are also outlined.
The document discusses the role and powers of the federal courts, particularly the Supreme Court, in American government. It notes that the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, allowing it to act as a lawmaking body by interpreting statutes and the Constitution. It also discusses how Supreme Court decisions are influenced by the philosophies of its members and cases that come before it. Additionally, it provides an overview of the judicial process, jurisdiction of federal courts, appointment of justices, and limitations on the courts' powers.
The document summarizes the two court systems in the United States - federal courts and state courts. Federal courts handle issues that arise under federal law while state courts handle most legal matters that arise within a state's borders, such as family law, criminal cases, and property disputes. The document also describes the structure of trial courts and appellate courts, the burden of proof in civil and criminal cases, and differences between civil and criminal law.
The Supreme Court has limited original jurisdiction, primarily involving disputes between states or foreign diplomats. It has appellate jurisdiction over all other cases, deciding whether to hear appeals based on the Constitution, acts of Congress, treaties, or if a lower court's decision should stand. The Court is made up of 9 justices including 1 Chief Justice who hear and rule on cases, writing opinions. Justices are nominated by the President and confirmed by Congress, and generally have backgrounds as lawyers through practice, teaching, or prior judging experience. The Court has the power of judicial review to determine the constitutionality of laws and acts.
Trial courts decide facts in disputed cases based on evidence and witness testimony. Judges and juries are essential parts of the legal system, with judges overseeing trials and juries selected from registered voters to serve if requested. Appeals courts review trial court decisions for legal errors based on written arguments, setting precedents that can be overturned by higher courts. The document then provides details on jury selection and duties, as well as an overview of the Mississippi and federal court systems.
The United States legal system is based on the U.S. Constitution and divided into three branches of government at both the federal and state levels. It includes multiple sources of law from constitutions, statutes, regulations, and case law. The court system is hierarchical with trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and highest appellate courts. A case typically progresses from trial court through the appellate process. Precedent from higher courts is mandatory authority that lower courts must follow, while decisions from other jurisdictions or secondary sources are persuasive but not binding.
The document discusses the US judiciary system. It provides information on the Supreme Court's shift to the right under George W. Bush's appointments, the role and powers of the federal judiciary, and judicial review. It also outlines the different levels of federal courts, from district courts to circuit courts of appeals to the Supreme Court, and discusses factors that influence Supreme Court decisions.
The document discusses the structure and powers of the US judicial branch and federal court system. It outlines that the Supreme Court heads the federal court hierarchy. Federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, are nominated by the president and approved by the Senate. The district courts have original jurisdiction to hear cases first, while the appellate courts and Supreme Court have appellate jurisdiction to hear appeals of cases. The Supreme Court can declare laws or actions unconstitutional, settling disputes between states or involving the federal government.
There are two court systems in the US - the federal and state judiciaries. The federal judiciary consists of the Supreme Court and lower federal courts established by Congress. It includes constitutional courts that interpret the Constitution and special courts like the Court of Military Appeals. The state judiciary in Pennsylvania includes the Supreme Court, Superior Court, Commonwealth Court, and lower trial courts. It has elected justices and handles both civil and criminal cases at the county and local level.
There are two main court systems in the United States - state courts and federal courts. The document describes California's state court system as an example, which has three levels: Superior Courts (trial courts), Courts of Appeal, and the Supreme Court. It also outlines the three levels of the federal court system - U.S. District Courts (trial courts), Courts of Appeal, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The key difference is that state courts hear cases involving state law while federal courts have jurisdiction over certain cases defined in the U.S. Constitution or federal law.
Laws reflect the culture, circumstances, and needs of society to maintain order. The document discusses the evolution of legal systems from individual revenge to centralized court systems. It also distinguishes between common law, developed through judicial precedent, and positive law set by a central authority. Finally, it categorizes different types of laws including constitutional, civil, criminal, procedural, substantive, and business laws. The document provides a broad overview of legal systems, the development of laws over time, and the different classifications of laws.
This document discusses judicial review of administrative agencies. It summarizes two landmark Supreme Court cases - Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe and Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. In Overton Park, the Court established that agency actions are subject to judicial review and remanded the case back to the agency to provide justification. In Chevron, the Court created the "reasonable interpretation" standard, requiring courts to defer to any reasonable agency interpretation if the law is ambiguous. These cases shaped the development of the "hard look doctrine" and increased judicialization and procedural requirements for agencies.
This document provides an overview of the US legal system including the purposes of law, types of laws, crimes and their punishments, civil litigation, and the structure and jurisdiction of state and federal courts. It also discusses factors considered in nominating and confirming Supreme Court justices and models of judicial decision making. The key functions of law are to provide security, predictability, and reflect societal values while distributing costs and benefits. Substantive law defines legal actions, and procedural law establishes legal procedures.
There are philosophical justifications for freedom of contract as well as limitations to it. Freedom of contract expresses individual autonomy and is a feature of free societies, but it can allow commodification, externalities, coercion, and imperfect information that harm third parties or exploit one party. Limitations aim to ensure fair outcomes and address market failures or unequal bargaining power between parties. Jurisdictions like the US, India, and Germany recognize contract freedom but impose constraints to prevent harms.
The U.S. court system is triangular with many trial courts at the bottom, fewer appeals courts in the middle, and a supreme court at the top at both the federal and state levels. Trial courts determine facts and apply the law, while appellate courts review trials for legal errors. The U.S. Supreme Court mainly hears appeals involving constitutional issues or disagreements between circuit courts. Specialized courts exist at both federal and state levels to handle specific areas like bankruptcy, taxes, or family law. Jurisdiction and venue determine where a case can be properly filed and heard.
The us federal court system & supreme courtpjosephchs
The US federal court system begins with district courts that hear both civil and criminal cases. Losing parties can appeal district court decisions to courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court chooses some cases to review appellate court decisions. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review to determine if laws are constitutional and can strike down laws, establishing precedent for future cases.
The U.S. court system is made up of the Supreme Court and over 100 federal courts that apply the law to actual situations and resolve criminal and civil cases. Criminal cases involve determining guilt and punishment for breaking laws, while civil cases settle large disagreements over issues like contracts and constitutional rights. Judges apply the law impartially while juries decide facts and responsibility in a case. Appeals move cases through higher state and federal courts if the original decision is disputed.
The Supreme Court has the final say over the constitutionality of laws through judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison. It decides cases based on precedent, intent of lawmakers, and justices' own opinions. Justices are nominated by the president and approved by the Senate. Their written opinions establish precedent that guides future legal decisions. The Court aims to select important constitutional cases but its decisions can shift the balance of power between branches and influence policymaking.
The Federal Court System consists of District Courts, Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme Court. District Courts hold trials and hear cases initially. Losing parties can appeal District Court decisions to Courts of Appeals. The Supreme Court has discretion to hear appeals and ensure laws comply with the Constitution through judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison. While the Court interprets laws, Congress and states can override decisions through new legislation or Constitutional amendments.
Justice Department Lawyers Who Mistook A President for their ClientKathleen Clark
Over the course of a century and a half, the U.S. Department of Justice has issued more than 50 opinions interpreting the constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause to protect our republic against foreign government influences. After President Trump was sued for violating the clause, the Department changed its position, and is now protecting Trump's ability to receive money from foreign governments rather than protecting the government itself.
This document summarizes key aspects of criminal procedure law in the United States. It discusses the purpose of criminal procedure and its derivation from the due process clauses. It outlines the main sources of criminal procedure law and covers topics like search and seizure law, the right to counsel, Miranda rights during interrogations, pretrial identification procedures, the confrontation and compulsory process clauses, and the exclusionary rule. It provides an overview of these concepts in 3 sentences or less.
This document summarizes key aspects of the US judicial system as established by the Constitution and subsequent Supreme Court rulings, including:
1) It outlines the establishment and powers of the federal court system according to Articles III of the Constitution.
2) It describes how judges are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, and the role of interest groups and politics in this process.
3) It explains the Supreme Court's power of judicial review to examine the constitutionality of laws and actions of the other branches of government.
The Philippine judicial system blends elements of civil law from Spanish influence and common law from American influence. It has a hierarchical structure consisting of lower courts, regional trial courts, appellate courts, specialized courts, and the Supreme Court. In recent decades, reforms have aimed to improve judicial qualifications, independence, accountability, and efficiency. However, issues remain regarding political influence, lack of resources, and case backlogs.
The document summarizes the two court systems in the United States - federal courts and state courts. Federal courts handle issues that arise under federal law while state courts handle most legal matters that arise within a state's borders, such as family law, criminal cases, and property disputes. The document also describes the structure of trial courts and appellate courts, the burden of proof in civil and criminal cases, and differences between civil and criminal law.
The Supreme Court has limited original jurisdiction, primarily involving disputes between states or foreign diplomats. It has appellate jurisdiction over all other cases, deciding whether to hear appeals based on the Constitution, acts of Congress, treaties, or if a lower court's decision should stand. The Court is made up of 9 justices including 1 Chief Justice who hear and rule on cases, writing opinions. Justices are nominated by the President and confirmed by Congress, and generally have backgrounds as lawyers through practice, teaching, or prior judging experience. The Court has the power of judicial review to determine the constitutionality of laws and acts.
Trial courts decide facts in disputed cases based on evidence and witness testimony. Judges and juries are essential parts of the legal system, with judges overseeing trials and juries selected from registered voters to serve if requested. Appeals courts review trial court decisions for legal errors based on written arguments, setting precedents that can be overturned by higher courts. The document then provides details on jury selection and duties, as well as an overview of the Mississippi and federal court systems.
The United States legal system is based on the U.S. Constitution and divided into three branches of government at both the federal and state levels. It includes multiple sources of law from constitutions, statutes, regulations, and case law. The court system is hierarchical with trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and highest appellate courts. A case typically progresses from trial court through the appellate process. Precedent from higher courts is mandatory authority that lower courts must follow, while decisions from other jurisdictions or secondary sources are persuasive but not binding.
The document discusses the US judiciary system. It provides information on the Supreme Court's shift to the right under George W. Bush's appointments, the role and powers of the federal judiciary, and judicial review. It also outlines the different levels of federal courts, from district courts to circuit courts of appeals to the Supreme Court, and discusses factors that influence Supreme Court decisions.
The document discusses the structure and powers of the US judicial branch and federal court system. It outlines that the Supreme Court heads the federal court hierarchy. Federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, are nominated by the president and approved by the Senate. The district courts have original jurisdiction to hear cases first, while the appellate courts and Supreme Court have appellate jurisdiction to hear appeals of cases. The Supreme Court can declare laws or actions unconstitutional, settling disputes between states or involving the federal government.
There are two court systems in the US - the federal and state judiciaries. The federal judiciary consists of the Supreme Court and lower federal courts established by Congress. It includes constitutional courts that interpret the Constitution and special courts like the Court of Military Appeals. The state judiciary in Pennsylvania includes the Supreme Court, Superior Court, Commonwealth Court, and lower trial courts. It has elected justices and handles both civil and criminal cases at the county and local level.
There are two main court systems in the United States - state courts and federal courts. The document describes California's state court system as an example, which has three levels: Superior Courts (trial courts), Courts of Appeal, and the Supreme Court. It also outlines the three levels of the federal court system - U.S. District Courts (trial courts), Courts of Appeal, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The key difference is that state courts hear cases involving state law while federal courts have jurisdiction over certain cases defined in the U.S. Constitution or federal law.
Laws reflect the culture, circumstances, and needs of society to maintain order. The document discusses the evolution of legal systems from individual revenge to centralized court systems. It also distinguishes between common law, developed through judicial precedent, and positive law set by a central authority. Finally, it categorizes different types of laws including constitutional, civil, criminal, procedural, substantive, and business laws. The document provides a broad overview of legal systems, the development of laws over time, and the different classifications of laws.
This document discusses judicial review of administrative agencies. It summarizes two landmark Supreme Court cases - Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe and Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. In Overton Park, the Court established that agency actions are subject to judicial review and remanded the case back to the agency to provide justification. In Chevron, the Court created the "reasonable interpretation" standard, requiring courts to defer to any reasonable agency interpretation if the law is ambiguous. These cases shaped the development of the "hard look doctrine" and increased judicialization and procedural requirements for agencies.
This document provides an overview of the US legal system including the purposes of law, types of laws, crimes and their punishments, civil litigation, and the structure and jurisdiction of state and federal courts. It also discusses factors considered in nominating and confirming Supreme Court justices and models of judicial decision making. The key functions of law are to provide security, predictability, and reflect societal values while distributing costs and benefits. Substantive law defines legal actions, and procedural law establishes legal procedures.
There are philosophical justifications for freedom of contract as well as limitations to it. Freedom of contract expresses individual autonomy and is a feature of free societies, but it can allow commodification, externalities, coercion, and imperfect information that harm third parties or exploit one party. Limitations aim to ensure fair outcomes and address market failures or unequal bargaining power between parties. Jurisdictions like the US, India, and Germany recognize contract freedom but impose constraints to prevent harms.
The U.S. court system is triangular with many trial courts at the bottom, fewer appeals courts in the middle, and a supreme court at the top at both the federal and state levels. Trial courts determine facts and apply the law, while appellate courts review trials for legal errors. The U.S. Supreme Court mainly hears appeals involving constitutional issues or disagreements between circuit courts. Specialized courts exist at both federal and state levels to handle specific areas like bankruptcy, taxes, or family law. Jurisdiction and venue determine where a case can be properly filed and heard.
The us federal court system & supreme courtpjosephchs
The US federal court system begins with district courts that hear both civil and criminal cases. Losing parties can appeal district court decisions to courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court chooses some cases to review appellate court decisions. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review to determine if laws are constitutional and can strike down laws, establishing precedent for future cases.
The U.S. court system is made up of the Supreme Court and over 100 federal courts that apply the law to actual situations and resolve criminal and civil cases. Criminal cases involve determining guilt and punishment for breaking laws, while civil cases settle large disagreements over issues like contracts and constitutional rights. Judges apply the law impartially while juries decide facts and responsibility in a case. Appeals move cases through higher state and federal courts if the original decision is disputed.
The Supreme Court has the final say over the constitutionality of laws through judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison. It decides cases based on precedent, intent of lawmakers, and justices' own opinions. Justices are nominated by the president and approved by the Senate. Their written opinions establish precedent that guides future legal decisions. The Court aims to select important constitutional cases but its decisions can shift the balance of power between branches and influence policymaking.
The Federal Court System consists of District Courts, Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme Court. District Courts hold trials and hear cases initially. Losing parties can appeal District Court decisions to Courts of Appeals. The Supreme Court has discretion to hear appeals and ensure laws comply with the Constitution through judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison. While the Court interprets laws, Congress and states can override decisions through new legislation or Constitutional amendments.
Justice Department Lawyers Who Mistook A President for their ClientKathleen Clark
Over the course of a century and a half, the U.S. Department of Justice has issued more than 50 opinions interpreting the constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause to protect our republic against foreign government influences. After President Trump was sued for violating the clause, the Department changed its position, and is now protecting Trump's ability to receive money from foreign governments rather than protecting the government itself.
This document summarizes key aspects of criminal procedure law in the United States. It discusses the purpose of criminal procedure and its derivation from the due process clauses. It outlines the main sources of criminal procedure law and covers topics like search and seizure law, the right to counsel, Miranda rights during interrogations, pretrial identification procedures, the confrontation and compulsory process clauses, and the exclusionary rule. It provides an overview of these concepts in 3 sentences or less.
This document summarizes key aspects of the US judicial system as established by the Constitution and subsequent Supreme Court rulings, including:
1) It outlines the establishment and powers of the federal court system according to Articles III of the Constitution.
2) It describes how judges are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, and the role of interest groups and politics in this process.
3) It explains the Supreme Court's power of judicial review to examine the constitutionality of laws and actions of the other branches of government.
The Philippine judicial system blends elements of civil law from Spanish influence and common law from American influence. It has a hierarchical structure consisting of lower courts, regional trial courts, appellate courts, specialized courts, and the Supreme Court. In recent decades, reforms have aimed to improve judicial qualifications, independence, accountability, and efficiency. However, issues remain regarding political influence, lack of resources, and case backlogs.
The Philippine judicial and legal system, including its legal education system, blends elements of civil law inherited from the Spaniards and American common law. For instance, civil code procedures on family and property matters, among others, and the absence of jury trials are attributable to the Spanish civil law influences. However, most of the more significant laws governing trade and commerce, taxation, labor relations, and governmental operations, as well as the principle of judicial precedents are an American derivation. In the hierarchy of laws, the Constitution has the highest legal force, followed by domestic statutes. In addition, generally accepted principles of international law and judicial precedents (i.e., decisions of the Supreme Court) also form part of the laws of the land.
The document summarizes the three branches of the US Federal Government: the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches. It provides details on the structure and roles of Congress (the Legislative branch consisting of the House of Representatives and Senate), the Presidency (the head of the Executive branch), and the Supreme Court (the head of the Judicial branch). It explains the powers and responsibilities of each branch according to the US Constitution.
This is a self-explanatory powerpoint lecture with information concerning the NCFCA resolution for 2015. Resolved: That the United States Federal Court system should be significantly reformed.
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Wordlisajurs
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the US and its decisions cannot be overturned by any other body. It has the power of judicial review to determine the constitutionality of laws. Cases reach the Court through appeals or in its original jurisdiction over disputes between states. The 9 Justices are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, holding lifetime appointments. Their decisions depend on whether the Court's composition is considered more liberal or conservative at the time.
The document provides an overview of the South African court system. It discusses the key principles in Section 165 of the Constitution regarding judicial authority and independence. It then describes the different courts in the system, including their jurisdiction, composition, and functions. The highest courts are the Constitutional Court, which has exclusive jurisdiction over constitutional matters, and the Supreme Court of Appeal, which only serves as an appeals court. Below this are the various divisions of the High Court, followed by regional and district magistrates' courts. Several specialized courts and tribunals are also outlined, including the CCMA for labor disputes.
The document provides information about the three branches of the US government as established by the Constitution:
1) The legislative branch is Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate, which has the power to create and pass laws.
2) The executive branch is led by the President, who enforces laws and commands the military.
3) The judicial branch includes the Supreme Court and lower federal courts, which interpret laws and the Constitution.
This letter from Jacob Zuma objects to the Constitutional Court's directive for him to file an affidavit addressing sanction for contempt of court. Zuma argues that the directive is a sham to legitimize the court's decision, which was made without hearing him. He refuses to file the affidavit on grounds of conscientious objection, citing concerns over lack of a fair hearing and deprivation of his constitutional rights by the court. Zuma believes the court has overstepped its jurisdiction and is biased in supporting politically-motivated narratives against him from the Zondo Commission.
This document provides an overview of a Civics course that covers government, politics, and law. It is broken into three main units. The course aims to educate youth about these topics so they can better understand how the country is run and make informed decisions. It also seeks to increase youth voter turnout. The document outlines key people in government like the Prime Minister and Ministers. It also explains concepts like the political spectrum, legal fundamentals in Canada like presumption of innocence, and the structure of the course.
The document discusses the importance and functions of the judiciary. It notes that the judiciary is the third organ of government responsible for applying laws to specific cases and settling disputes. Its key functions include giving justice, interpreting and applying laws, playing a role in law-making through precedents, protecting rights, and acting as guardian of the constitution. An independent judiciary is important as it protects citizens from legislative and executive overreach and ensures the rule of law. The document also examines different methods of appointing judges to ensure judicial independence and impartiality.
This PowerPoint details the first ten amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and explains the rights and privileges that are granted to citizens, protecting them from expansive government power.
This document provides an introduction to business and labour law. It discusses the key differences between criminal and civil liability. Criminal law deals with crimes and punishment, while civil law regulates disputes and provides compensation. It also summarizes the main sources of law, including legislation, precedent, customs, common law, and equity. Equity developed to provide remedies that were not available under common law. While courts have merged common law and equity, they remain distinct approaches.
Law is a powerful and important social force that affects most aspects of life. There are several classifications and sources of law that help explain its complex nature. Law can be classified as public or private, civil or criminal, substantive or procedural, common law or statutory law. The main sources of law include constitutional law, treaties, administrative law, statutory law, case law, federal law, and state law. Understanding these classifications and sources is helpful for examining how law shapes social life.
This presentation by Jonathan JACOBSON, Partner Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, was made during the discussion “The standard of review by courts in competition cases” held at the 129th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 4 June 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/srccc
Lecture Chapter 15 The Origins and Development of Judicial Power.docxBetseyCalderon89
Lecture: Chapter 15 The Origins and Development of Judicial Power
The framers of the United States Constitution made the judiciary the least defined of the three branches of government. The Constitution left open the actual structure of the court system for Congress to define it. Article III merely vests judicial power in one Supreme Court.
Therefore, Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1789. This legislation defined federal court jurisdiction and created the structure of the federal court system. Congress decreed that the judicial branch would have three tiers. The system would include district or trial courts at the first level, appellate courts at the second level, and the Supreme Court at the highest level.
Furthermore, Congress created the following jurisdictions: The Supreme Court would have original jurisdiction in cases involving states or ambassadors. This means all such cases immediately go to the Supreme Court. Additionally, the Supreme Court would have appellate jurisdiction in all cases decided by the lower federal or state courts. This means the Supreme Court has the right to review any legal decision on appeal.
Still, the judicial branch and the Supreme Court wielded little power at this point. The court system simply had no cases to decide. Of course, this is not too far off from what the framers had in mind. However, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall changed all of that with his decision in Marbury v. Madison.
Marshall's decision gave the Supreme Court the two immediate powers of judicial review and legal interpretation. Judicial review is the court's ultimate power. It has allowed the courts to update the Constitution through reinterpretation and to protect minorities against oppressive majorities. Also, the courts enjoy the power of legal interpretation. This is the power to interpret and reinterpret law.
However, case selection is the most often utilized Supreme Court power. The court wields vast power through its ability to hear or refuse to hear cases. The court has unfettered authority to choose which cases end up on its docket. In fact, the court accepts fewer than 1% of all cases presented for appeal.
Why does the Supreme Court refuse to hear certain cases? Legal scholars cite three basic reasons:
1
. Agreement with the lower court decision
The court could easily find nothing wrong with the lower court's decision. Also, the lower court may be in agreement with the Supreme Court's legal and political beliefs or philosophy.
2
. Issue not significant enough to warrant Supreme Court intervention
Every year, litigants appeal or file over 7,000 cases with the Supreme Court. The court eventually accepts approximately 100. Of course, the court will only accept those cases with significant legal, societal, or political consequences.
3
. Court not ready to hear issue
Some legal issues need time to season. For example, civil rights cases w.
The document discusses substantive and procedural due process. It defines substantive due process as protecting fundamental rights outlined in the Constitution as well as other rights determined by the Supreme Court. These include rights like privacy, travel, and marriage. It also discusses how the right to contract was once a fundamental right but is now evaluated under a lower standard. Procedural due process requires fair procedures, such as notice and unbiased hearings, before the government can deprive someone of life, liberty, or property. It lists specific procedural rights like presenting evidence and cross-examining witnesses.
This document provides an introduction to criminal law, including definitions of crimes and differences between civil and criminal law. It outlines key topics like sources of law, purposes of punishment, and classifications of crimes. Criminal law prohibits certain acts and omissions, while criminal procedure governs individuals' rights during the criminal process. Civil law involves private disputes resolved through litigation, with the goal of compensating injuries, while criminal prosecutions are brought by the government to punish wrongdoers and protect the public.
This document summarizes key aspects of the Australian legal system. It outlines the classification of law into public law and private law. Public law includes criminal law, administrative law, and constitutional law. Private law regulates relationships between individuals and organizations, including contract law, tort law, and property law. The document also discusses criminal and civil court procedures, the roles of legal professionals, juries, and compares common law and civil law systems.
The document provides an overview of the Philippine judiciary system. It discusses the objectives of understanding the functions of the judiciary, how it exercises political neutrality and fairness, and evaluates its performance. It then details the powers and roles of the different courts in the Philippine system from the Supreme Court down to lower courts and quasi-judicial agencies. It explains the appointment process for judges, their terms, and the importance of an independent judiciary.
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
ग्रेटर मुंबई के नगर आयुक्त को एक खुले पत्र में याचिका दायर कर 540 से अधिक मुंबईकरों ने सभी अवैध और अस्थिर होर्डिंग्स, साइनबोर्ड और इलेक्ट्रिक साइनेज को तत्काल हटाने और 13 मई, 2024 की शाम को घाटकोपर में अवैध होर्डिंग के गिरने की विनाशकारी घटना के बाद अपराधियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की मांग की है, जिसमें 17 लोगों की जान चली गई और कई निर्दोष लोग गंभीर रूप से घायल हो गए।
Slide deck with charts from our Digital News Report 2024, the most comprehensive exploration of news consumption habits around the world, based on survey data from more than 95,000 respondents across 47 countries.
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHYVoterMood
Discover the life and times of Lalu Prasad Yadav with a comprehensive biography in Hindi. Learn about his early days, rise in politics, controversies, and contribution.
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...rittaajmal71
Since fleeing to the United States in 2014, Guo Wengui has founded a number of projects in the United States, such as GTV Media Group, GTV private equity, farm loan project, G Club Operations Co., LTD., and Himalaya Exchange.
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...The Lifesciences Magazine
Federal authorities have advised the public to remain vigilant but calm in response to the ongoing bird flu outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu.
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdfEdouardHusson
Ceci est le projet de traité qui avait été négocié entre Russes et Ukrainiens à Istanbul en mars 2022, avant que les Etats-Unis et la Grande-Bretagne ne détournent Kiev de signer.
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Recent years have seen a disturbing rise in violence, discrimination, and intolerance against Christian communities in various Islamic countries. This multifaceted challenge, deeply rooted in historical, social, and political animosities, demands urgent attention. Despite the escalating persecution, substantial support from the Western world remains lacking.
2. Purpose:
• A panel discussion is a public
exchange of ideas with a goal of
informing audience members about
a particular subject or issue. Its like
Brainstorming. We are here to
inform you more about our topic
"Impeachment for Dummies: A
primer".
3. Impeachment
• An impeachment is a statement of
“verified” charges filed by at least
one third (95) of Congressmen. It is
not a conviction. Like an indictment
in a criminal case, the accused still
has to be tried.
4. • An impeachment is a political process not a
legal one. Thus, the accused may be
“convicted” even if he has not committed a
crime: The Senators may simply deem he is
unfit to hold his office.
• For Erap’s condition, he was detained because
of a Sandiganbayan decision, not because of
the impeachment trial.
5. • The prosecution is represented by 11 Congressmen
called Representative-Prosecutors.
• The prosecutors and Senators are not bound by
court rules of procedure and evidence. However they
must be fair and consistent.
• The Senators, most of them non- lawyers, are
expected to vote based on public interest, not
necessarily on the law. Their verdict is not
appealable.
6. • The President, VP, Supreme Court Justices,
Members of a Constitutional Commission and
the Ombudsman can be impeached for
“Culpable violation of the Constitution,
treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other
high crimes or violation of public trust”. Only
Erap and Ombudsman Gutierrez have ever
been impeached.
• The other charges are self-explanatory.
7. Culpable violation of the
Constitution
• the willful disregard of the
fundamental law
8. Other high crimes
• offenses so serious as to affect the
orderly workings of Government.
9. Betrayal of the public
trust
• denotes any act unbecoming of a
public official such as abuse of
authority or neglect of duty
10. THE CHARGES
• For being partial in cases involving GMA.
• For non-disclosure of his Statement of
Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN).
• For flip-flopping decisions in final and
executory cases.
• For breaching the Constitutional
separation of powers by issuing a status
quo ante in the impeachment against the
Ombudsman Gutierrez.
11. • For arbitrariness and for resurrecting decided cases
involving the status of 16 newly created cities and
promotion of Dinagat Island into a province.
• For partiality in granting the TRO and related
decisions in the GMA travel matter.
• Improperly exculpating Justice del Castillo in the
plagiarism case.
• For not adequately accounting for the Judiciary Dev.
Fund and Special Allowances.
12. THE DEFENSE
• The Articles are defective because they have not
been “verified” by the 188 signatories as
constitutionally required. “Verification” means
reading the complaint and affirming the charges
based on the evidence.
• The SC is a collegial body in which the Chief
Justice is only one of 15 votes.
• As with the other Justices, the CJ has
administratively if not “publicly” disclosed his
SALNs. Only two, Carpio and Sereno, have
publicly disclosed theirs.
13. • Theoretically, the Senators should
vote based on the evidence.
• The public seems to favor a
conviction because it sees Corona as
an extension of GMA.
• There are 9 likely to convict, 9
undecided, and 5 unlikely. Only 8
are needed to acquit.
14. • The key to the public, the one they
understand and the easiest to prove
if at all, is the case for ill-gotten
wealth even though, ironically, it is
not specified in the Articles. If this is
bullet-proof then we will have a new
Chief Justice. Otherwise a conviction
is challenging unless the CJ resigns.