This document outlines a group project assignment for a course on the construction industry. The project involves interviewing a professional from the building team of a construction project and creating a magazine summarizing the interview. Students will be assigned a professional role to interview, such as architect, engineer, or quantity surveyor. They must conduct the interview, record it, and use the information to create an 8-12 page magazine in PDF and print formats. The magazine must include the interviewed professional's company profile, personal profile, and description of their roles and responsibilities on one or two projects. A peer assessment form is also included to evaluate each group member's contributions.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
1. SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & DESIGN
Research Unit for Modern Architecture Studies in Southeast Asia
Foundation of Natural and Built Environments
Introduction to the Construction Industry
Prerequisite: None
Lecturers: Hasmanira Mokhtar, Noorul Iffa Mohd Nayan, Jaqurliyn Ann See Peng
_____________________________________________________________________
Project 1B (Group and Individual) – updated as of 18th Sept 2014
Profession in construction industry – Building Teams: Identifying their specific roles
30% (30% Group, Individual performance based on peer assessment)
Submission date – 14th October 2014
Introduction
It is not the beauty of a building you should look at ;
It is the construction of the foundation that will stand the test of time..
David Allan Coe
Objectives of Project
To enable students to develop an understanding of the building team, its organization, their duties,
responsibilities and the inter-relationship within which they will seek employment, career progression or
further study.
To develop an awareness of their professional responsibilities and to appreciate their profession in the
construction industry.
To assess the students understanding on the general construction process from the sketch plan to
completion of a building and introduce the scope of work handled by the players involved.
Learning Outcomes
Explain and illustrate structures of organizations and the team involved in the construction industry.
Explain the roles and responsibilities of the entities touching briefly the legal and contractual procedures
and impact.
Ability to document their observations and understanding from interview session and research resources
as well as to communicate in a systematic and convincing booklet.
2. Tasks
PART I : INTERVIEW
- In a group of 5 members, you are required to interview one of the professions from the following
list. The profession will be randomly assigned to you.
- You are then required to select a firm or company in which the profession assigned to you work in.
Set up an interview with him/her.
- In the interview session, you are required to find out
o the company profile (history, company structure and any relevant information)
o the profile/background of your interviewee in construction industry (his working
experience, projects he involved in, and any other relevant information)
o two (2) projects in which your profession involved
o his/her roles and responsibilities in that particular projects
o other relevant information…
- You are advised to plan and think of the questions and structure of the interview properly to avoid
second appointment with your interviewee.
- You are also required to record the interview session as a part and parcel of the submission
component in this assignment.
- List of Building Team :
No Profession (ICI)
1 Architect
2 Interior Architect/Interior Designer
3 Quantity Surveyor
4 Landscape Architect
5 Civil and Structural Engineer
6 Mechanical and Electrical Engineer
- The questions you ask during the interview shall gain further detail information about the
process and procedure the key player has to carry out in order to complete a project according
to the client needs.
PART 2 : MAGAZINE
- From the information gathered through the interview in Part I, your next task is to create a
magazine that would demonstrate your understanding in Part I.
- The magazine should include the following components :
o Company profile
o Profile of the interviewee
o Introduction of the project(s) that your interviewee work in
o Detailed description and explanation of his/her roles and responsibilities in that particular
project(s)
- You may refer to their current company profile (if any), however you are required to express the
information with your own words and style. Should plagiarism is found, penalty will be applied.
- You can either feature ONE or TWO projects that your interviewee involved in. No. of project to be
featured is dependent on the scale of the project. The project however is not necessarily a
completed project.
3. Submission Requirement
- CD which includes the video recording of the interview and softcopy of your magazine in PDF format
- An A5 sized, colored and printed magazine
- The magazine should be 8 – 12 pages
- Submission date : 14th. October 2014
4. SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & DESIGN
Modern Architecture Studies in Southeast Asia (MASSA) Research Unit
Foundation in Natural and Built Environments
PEER ASSESSMENT FORM(PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL) QSB30105 Introduction to Construction Industry
Write the proficiency level from the rubric that fits each group members’ participation in the box under the collaboration skill. Include
your own name in the list. For ranking, use “1” for the group member that you feel contributed the most to the work, followed by other
group members in order of contributions. The ranking should reflect the participant level of each member.
Name of Group Member Participation Leadership Communication Cooperation
Time
Management
TOTAL
(Out of 25)
RANK
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5 4 3 2 1
Participation Group member participated
fully and was always on
task in class.
Group member often
participated, was usually on
time and did their task well,
and immediately, if
prompted.
Group member sometimes
participated, occasionally
wasted time or sometimes
worked on unrelated
material.
Group member was often
missing, contributed
minimally or often worked
on unrelated material.
Group member did not
participate, wasted time, or
worked on unrelated
material.
Leadership Group member assumed
leadership in an appropriate
way when necessary by
helping the group stay on
track, encouraging group
participation, posing
solutions to problems, and
having a positive attitude.
Group member occasionally
assumed leadership in an
appropriate way,
inconsistently, and
generally helped to
maintain good group
participation, and having a
positive attitude.
Group member usually
allowed others to assume
leadership or often
dominated the group.
Group member seldom
assumed leadership and
occasionally undermined
the leadership of others.
Group member did not
assume leadership or
assumed it in a
nonproductive manner and
generally behaved in a
manner detrimental to the
overall attitude of the group.
Communication Group member listened
carefully to others’ ideas.
Group member offered
detailed, constructive
feedback when appropriate.
Group member often
listened to others’ ideas and
offered feedback that was
usually relevant and
appropriate.
Group member sometimes
listened to others and
interrupted them. Group
member occasionally
offered constructive
feedback, but sometimes
the comments were
inappropriate or not useful.
Group member often did
not listen to others.
Feedback was seldom
given and usually
inappropriate o unhelpful.
Group member did not
listen to others and often
interrupted them. Group
member did not offer
constructive or useful
feedback.
Cooperation Group member treated
others respectfully and
shared the workload fairly.
Group member usually
treated others respectfully
and often tried to share
workload fairly.
Group member sometimes
treated others
disrespectfully or did not
share the workload fairly.
Group member often
treated others
disrespectfully and often
tried to distribute workload
unfairly.
Group member treated
others disrespectfully or did
not share the workload
fairly.
Time
Management
Group member completed
assigned tasks on time.
Group member completed
most of the task assigned
on time.
Group member sometimes
did not complete the
assigned tasks on time and
occasionally forced the
group to make last-minute
adjustments and changes
to accommodate missing
work.
Group member did not
complete most of the tasks
assigned on time.
Group member did not
complete most of the
assigned tasks on time and
often forced the group to
make last-minute
adjustments and changes
to accommodate missing
work.
5. List down some of the main tasks that had been assigned to you for this assignment and briefly describe your performance:
1. _________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. _________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. _________________________________________________________________________________________________
You may also list any other contributions that you feel you have made for your team:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Briefly comment on the contributions of other group member, particularly those you feel contributed more or less than expected:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Student’s Signature : Date:
Student’s Name : Student ID:
This section for comments by Lecturers / Tutors: