1. Š2010 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice
HP Software Applications Solutions
November 30, 2010
Mastering the Modern
Application Lifecycle
2. The Application Reality
Most
enterprises
run major
software
operations.
ERP
wikis
inventory
management
supply
chain
billing
order entry
PoS
mobile apps
website
payments
CRM
HR
Embedded
software
3. 3 Footer goes here
Business
nimbleness
depends on
application
nimbleness.
4. P
P
P
Application Delivery: Yesterday & Today
DISTRIBUTED
TEAMS
FLEXIBLE
METHODS
COMPOSITE,
CLOUD, RIA
CO-LOCATED
TEAMS
SEQUENTIAL
METHODS
THIN CLIENT,
SELF-CONTAINED
people
process
tech.
Stability Agility
Biz to IT: âDo as I askâ Biz to IT: âBring me ideasâ
Biz cost reduction Biz and IT cost reduction
Exhaustive Just enough
âDoes it work?â âDoes it impress?â
6. Old Ways No Match for Modern Ends
New Pressures on Delivery Fundamentals
use cases,
burn charts
Have we covered
all requirements?
Has anyone verified
the new GUI is
secure?
What are the
working parts
of the app?
tests,
milestones
Predictable
outcome?
High quality
apps?
Responsive
to change?
Nearly 60% of IT leaders
say distributed teams
significantly impacts
productivity.
âForrester
On average, 25% of
application defects are
found by customers.
âCapers Jones
âRFCs can be in the
2,000 to 7,000 range [per
month].â
âGartner
8. Core Delivery is a Beginning, Not an End
The Invisible Lifecycle
âFor a business
application that is used
for 15 years, the cost to
go live is, on average,
8% of the lifetime
TCO.â
âGartner
A Framework for the Lifetime Total Cost of Ownership of an Application. Gartner Research, March 30, 2010.
9. Tactical Value: Integrated Application Supply Chain
Solve for the Complete Lifecycle
Burn rate, go/no-
go metrics
DevOps integration for
performance SLAs
Seamless RFC capture and
prioritization
Architectural
policies &
compliance
Data archival,
application
end-of-life
10. Strategic Value: A Complete View of Business Investment
Solve for the Complete Lifecycle
SLA trendsBreak/fix
volatility
Cumulative
spend
Technical
debt
Age and
usage
11. Traceability & Metrics
Single Platform
Simplified Web Access
Technology Agnostic
Powerful Automation
Quality at the Center
Modular
Integrated
Heterogeneous
Best-in-class
HP Lifecycle Solutions & Operating
Principles
COMPLETE
LIFECYCLE
COVERAGE
PLAN
Project &
Portfolio
Management
DELIVE
R
RUN RETIRE
HP ALM
Quality
Center
Perform
Center
App.
Security
Center
Business
Availability
Deployment
Automation
Service
Management
Records
Management
Archiving
CORE
LIFECYCLE
EXCELLENCE
HP APPLICATION LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT
Project Planning & Tracking Enterprise Release Management
ALM Foundation
Process standardization Reporting Extensibility
Requirements
Management
Development
Management
Quality Management
Definition
Versioning &
Change Control
Link to
IDE,
SCM
Defect
Mgmt.
Secure
Code
Function Perform Secure
SOA Systinet
12. HP Helps Deliver What the Business Wants
Base: 206 IT decision makers with insight into budgeted modernization activities. Source: Clearing Your Path to Modern Applications and Business Agility, Forrester Research,
April 6, 2010. A Forrester Consulting thought leadership paper commissioned by Hewlett Packard.
Cut release
cycles in half
90% resources freed
for innovation Saved $3.9M per
year
ďź
ďź
ďź
13. Why HP?
Integrated management & automation: instead of
loosely coupled point tools, HP provides a cohesive
platform for lifecycle management and automation.
Technology & methodology agnostic: broadest
support for heterogeneous environments (.NET, Java,
SAP, Oracle, etc.) â covers more than 70 environments.
Covers traditional and Agile methods in single solution.
Project ready, enterprise scale: whether for a team of
ten, or an enterprise of tens of thousands, HP solutions
offer proven configurability and scalability.
Complete application lifecycle: no other company
offers the integrated product coverage of HP to support
applications from beginning to end.
15. A Matter of Business Outcome
Application Lifecycle Maturity Model
⢠Delivery by heroic
individual effort
⢠Progress is
guesstimated
⢠No tools
(management by
Excel)
⢠No common
technical policy
⢠Quality is highly
variable; customer
as tester
Level 1
Ad hoc
⢠Effort is correlated
to progress
⢠Point tools
⢠Intra-project
technical policy,
manual
enforcement
⢠Pockets of test
automation
⢠Consistent quality
for projects of like-
size
Level 2
Functional
Competence
⢠Project progress
measured by KPI
⢠Intra-project
sharing, reuse
⢠Inter-project tech.
policy, manual
enforcement
⢠Tools with some
integration
⢠Regular test
automation
⢠Consistent quality
for projects of
variable-size
⢠âROI awareâ
Level 3
Functional
Excellence
⢠Program progress
measured by KPI
⢠Inter-project
sharing, reuse
⢠Enterprise tech.
policy and
automated
enforcement
⢠Complete
requirement
traceability
⢠Automation across
core lifecycle
⢠Integrated tool
suites
⢠âROI expectantâ
Level 4
Cross-
functional
Proficiency ⢠Delivery progress
integrated into
portfolio view
(normalized,
dynamic)
⢠Efficient DevOps
connection for
application
deployment,
security,
performance
⢠IT as integrated
âsupply chainâ for
app. change
management
⢠Automation across
complete lifecycle
⢠âROI ensuredâ
Level 5
Integrated
Lifecycle
16. A Matter of Business Outcome
Application Lifecycle Maturity Model
⢠Delivery by heroic
individual effort
⢠Progress is
guesstimated
⢠No tools
(management by
Excel)
⢠No common
technical policy
⢠Quality is highly
variable; customer
as tester
Level 1
Ad hoc
⢠Effort is correlated
to progress
⢠Point tools
⢠Intra-project
technical policy,
manual
enforcement
⢠Pockets of test
automation
⢠Consistent quality
for projects of like-
size
Level 2
Functional
Competence
⢠Project progress
measured by KPI
⢠Intra-project
sharing, reuse
⢠Inter-project tech.
policy, manual
enforcement
⢠Tools with some
integration
⢠Regular test
automation
⢠Consistent quality
for projects of
variable-size
⢠âROI awareâ
Level 3
Functional
Excellence
⢠Program progress
measured by KPI
⢠Inter-project
sharing, reuse
⢠Enterprise tech.
policy and
automated
enforcement
⢠Complete
requirement
traceability
⢠Automation across
core lifecycle
⢠Integrated tool
suites
⢠âROI expectantâ
Level 4
Cross-
functional
Proficiency ⢠Delivery progress
integrated into
portfolio view
(normalized,
dynamic)
⢠Efficient DevOps
connection for
application
deployment,
security,
performance
⢠IT as integrated
âsupply chainâ for
app. change
management
⢠Automation across
complete lifecycle
⢠âROI ensuredâ
Level 5
Integrated
Lifecycle
Core lifecycle
Fundamentals
Complete lifecycle
Excellence
Integrated
portfolio
17. Core Delivery is a Beginning, Not an End
The Invisible Lifecycle
âFor a business
application that is
used for 15 years, the
cost to go live is, on
average, 8% of the
lifetime TCO.â
âGartner
A Framework for the Lifetime Total Cost of Ownership of an Application. Gartner Research, March 30, 2010.