THE HIGH LINE NEW YORK ,NY
CASE STUDY
AZEB SEIFE
ID 1015/20
SEC 2
Introduction
Location: the highline park, new york, united states of America
History
 May 2003, James
Corner Field
Operations with Diller
Scofidio +
Renfro competed
against 720 teams from
36 countries to win the
infrastructure conversion
project of the New York
City High Line. More
than half a decade later,
the High Line’s transition
to a public park is
almost complete. On
June 8th, architects,
elected officials, and
advocates watched as
Mayor Michael
Bloomberg cut the
ceremonial red ribbon,
officially announcing the
opening of the first of
three sections.
 Inspired by the wild seeded
landscape left after the line
had been abandoned, the
team created a paving system
that encourages natural
growth which creates a
‘pathless’ landscape.
”Through a strategy of agri-
tecture - part agriculture, part
architecture – the High
Line surface is digitized into
discrete units of paving and
planting which are assembled
along the 1.5 miles into a
variety of gradients from
100% paving to 100% soft,
richly vegetated biotopes,”
explained DS + Renfro. This
undefined and unobtrusive
environment allows the public
to meander and experience
the park as they wish
About
Total Surface Area: 296,000 square feet
Total Acreage: 6.7 acres
Total Length:
1.45 miles without Post Office spur
1.52 miles with Post Office spur
Columns: approximately 475
Buildings Traveled Through: 2
Buildings Traveled Over: 13
Building Sidings: 9
City Blocks Crossed: 22
Publicly Owned Lots Traversed: 2
Privately Owned Lots Traversed: 31
Total Street Crossings: 25
Maximum Width: 88 feet
Minimum Width: 30 feet
Rail Easement: 20 feet above the track
Load Capacity: 4 fully loaded freight
trains
Height: O feet to 29 feet above grade
Materials: Steel frame, reinforced
concrete deck,gravel ballast, metal
handrails
Section and details
Site and Context and Design Idea
 Site and Context
 * 3 distinctive neighborhoods
 * Threat of demolition
 * Opportunistic landscape began to
grow
 * Site itself provided the inspiration
 * Intimate Scale
 *Feeling of being more removed from
the big city
 Design Idea
 * As an ambitious urban
reclamation project
 * preserve and recycle
 * Politically, Ecologically,
Historically, Socially, and
Economically Sustainable
 * Community activism
 * 6-acre green roof
 * Retrofit project
 * Neighborhood and world-class
park
 * generate revenue, attract
businesses, and stimulate local
economic growth
Design Elements and Impact and Inspiration
 Design Elements
 * Wild and dynamic landscape
 * Industrial and robust materials
 * Plantings, furnishing, paving,
lighting and utilities were
conceived and built as one
system
 * Embedding the rail tracks
directly into the paving system
 Impact and Inspiration
 * Revitalization of Manhattan's West
Side
 * Catalyst for investment
 * Population increase
 * Building permits around the High Line
doubled
 * Iconic and specific to its place
 * Feasibility of replicating in other cities.
construction
What we learn
 Why Saving the High Line?
 1. Connecting rail easement to
within manhattan to be
preserved.
 2. public benefit. open leisure
spaces.
 3.Unique Linear experience of
NY experience 4.Strengthening
Community - LandValue,
Revenue
 Learnings
 1. Example of successful
urban public space creation 2.
The cultural and historical
continuity is made through the
rediscovery of the space
 3. Sensible Incorporation of
Landscape urbanism
 4. Innovative adaptability of
existing infrastructure
conclusion
 *The High line alters the city park
paradigm by engaging the visitor
in a densely urbanexperience of
an elevated post-industrial re-use
space while utilizing a naturalistic
plantingaesthetic
 *By attempting to replicate a
“wild” nature, it alters the idea of
nature that visitors have intheir
own imaginations.«Such an
attempt to simulate wilderness
feeds a new virtual reality of the
garden; it fuels themind to both
remember past and anticipate
future imaginings and challenge
the presentunderstandings and
expectations of nature.
 *The High Line disguises the
Picturesque with the smoke and
mirrors of a
“naturalizedlandscape,” making it
more difficult for people to
understand what ecological
quality lookslike.
how to write budget and time frame for research.pptx
how to write budget and time frame for research.pptx
how to write budget and time frame for research.pptx
how to write budget and time frame for research.pptx
how to write budget and time frame for research.pptx

how to write budget and time frame for research.pptx

  • 1.
    THE HIGH LINENEW YORK ,NY CASE STUDY AZEB SEIFE ID 1015/20 SEC 2
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Location: the highlinepark, new york, united states of America
  • 5.
  • 6.
     May 2003,James Corner Field Operations with Diller Scofidio + Renfro competed against 720 teams from 36 countries to win the infrastructure conversion project of the New York City High Line. More than half a decade later, the High Line’s transition to a public park is almost complete. On June 8th, architects, elected officials, and advocates watched as Mayor Michael Bloomberg cut the ceremonial red ribbon, officially announcing the opening of the first of three sections.
  • 7.
     Inspired bythe wild seeded landscape left after the line had been abandoned, the team created a paving system that encourages natural growth which creates a ‘pathless’ landscape. ”Through a strategy of agri- tecture - part agriculture, part architecture – the High Line surface is digitized into discrete units of paving and planting which are assembled along the 1.5 miles into a variety of gradients from 100% paving to 100% soft, richly vegetated biotopes,” explained DS + Renfro. This undefined and unobtrusive environment allows the public to meander and experience the park as they wish
  • 8.
    About Total Surface Area:296,000 square feet Total Acreage: 6.7 acres Total Length: 1.45 miles without Post Office spur 1.52 miles with Post Office spur Columns: approximately 475 Buildings Traveled Through: 2 Buildings Traveled Over: 13 Building Sidings: 9 City Blocks Crossed: 22 Publicly Owned Lots Traversed: 2 Privately Owned Lots Traversed: 31 Total Street Crossings: 25 Maximum Width: 88 feet Minimum Width: 30 feet Rail Easement: 20 feet above the track Load Capacity: 4 fully loaded freight trains Height: O feet to 29 feet above grade Materials: Steel frame, reinforced concrete deck,gravel ballast, metal handrails
  • 12.
  • 16.
    Site and Contextand Design Idea  Site and Context  * 3 distinctive neighborhoods  * Threat of demolition  * Opportunistic landscape began to grow  * Site itself provided the inspiration  * Intimate Scale  *Feeling of being more removed from the big city  Design Idea  * As an ambitious urban reclamation project  * preserve and recycle  * Politically, Ecologically, Historically, Socially, and Economically Sustainable  * Community activism  * 6-acre green roof  * Retrofit project  * Neighborhood and world-class park  * generate revenue, attract businesses, and stimulate local economic growth
  • 17.
    Design Elements andImpact and Inspiration  Design Elements  * Wild and dynamic landscape  * Industrial and robust materials  * Plantings, furnishing, paving, lighting and utilities were conceived and built as one system  * Embedding the rail tracks directly into the paving system  Impact and Inspiration  * Revitalization of Manhattan's West Side  * Catalyst for investment  * Population increase  * Building permits around the High Line doubled  * Iconic and specific to its place  * Feasibility of replicating in other cities.
  • 18.
  • 25.
    What we learn Why Saving the High Line?  1. Connecting rail easement to within manhattan to be preserved.  2. public benefit. open leisure spaces.  3.Unique Linear experience of NY experience 4.Strengthening Community - LandValue, Revenue  Learnings  1. Example of successful urban public space creation 2. The cultural and historical continuity is made through the rediscovery of the space  3. Sensible Incorporation of Landscape urbanism  4. Innovative adaptability of existing infrastructure
  • 29.
    conclusion  *The Highline alters the city park paradigm by engaging the visitor in a densely urbanexperience of an elevated post-industrial re-use space while utilizing a naturalistic plantingaesthetic  *By attempting to replicate a “wild” nature, it alters the idea of nature that visitors have intheir own imaginations.«Such an attempt to simulate wilderness feeds a new virtual reality of the garden; it fuels themind to both remember past and anticipate future imaginings and challenge the presentunderstandings and expectations of nature.  *The High Line disguises the Picturesque with the smoke and mirrors of a “naturalizedlandscape,” making it more difficult for people to understand what ecological quality lookslike.