SlideShare a Scribd company logo
AQA His1N
N C Gardner MA PGCE
 Psychological need: there was a psychological
need for a single leader to follow and worship.
 The Tsars of Russia had been worshipped as
fathers of the nation, with icons in homes – Stalin
now acted in place of the Tsar.
 Stalin created a Cult of Lenin after Lenin’s death
in January 1924. To millions of peasants, whose
religious instincts were repressed under the
revolution, the Lenin Mausoleum soon became a
place of pilgrimage.
 Stalin was personally responsible for the creation
of the cult – he defied Lenin, who had also filled
the psychological role as leader, and then used
the Lenin legacy to make himself the ‘Lenin of
Today’.
 Just as original Christianity, as it was spreading
into pagan countries, absorbed elements of
pagan beliefs and rites and blended them with its
own ideas, so now Marxism, the product of
western European thought, was absorbing
elements of the Byzantine tradition, so deeply
ingrained in Russia.
 Gigantic busts and portraits at every corner,
speeches on artistic and scientific subjects
glorified Stalin.
 Cities and streets named in honour of Lenin
and Stalin (Leningrad and Stalingrad) helped
create the cult.
 The abstract ideas of Marxism could exist, in
their purity, in the brains of intellectual
revolutionaries, especially those who had
lived as exiles in western Europe before the
revolution.
 Now, after the doctrine had really been
transplanted to Russia and come to dominate
the outlook of a great nation, it could
assimilate itself to that nation’s spiritual
climate, to its traditions, customs, and habits.
 Stalin supported every contention of his with
a quotation from Lenin, sometimes out of
context, in the same way that medieval
scholars had sought sanction for their
speculations in the holy writ of the Bible.
 Lenin had also sometimes backed his
arguments with all too frequent references to
Marx. Stalin might as well have said: “Give me
a quotation from Lenin and I will move the
earth.”
 As the cult of Stalin grew it became more
difficult to resist as people wished to follow
their neighbours and take part in mass
activities.
 People genuinely wished to thank Stalin for
material improvements in their lives, such as
the end of rationing in 1935, extended
education and the removal of ‘enemies of the
people’ in the purges of the 1930s.
 There was an element of fear in existence in
the Soviet Union in the 1930s due to the
purges, show trials and NKVD arrests that
meant that some people would feel pressured
into supporting the cult of Stalin.
 Under Stalin’s dictatorship the revolutionary
elements inherited from Lenin combined with
Russian traditions.
 Like Cromwell as Lord Protector or Napoleon as
Emperor of the French, Stalin became the
guardian and the trustee of the revolution. He
consolidated its gains and extended them. He
‘built socialism’; and even his opponents, while
denouncing his autocracy, admitted that most of
his economic reforms were indeed essential for
socialism.
 Stalin’s technique of power revealed his
distrustful attitude towards society, his
pessimistic approach to it. Socialism was to
be built by coercion rather than persuasion.
 Stalin had the last word in the Politbureau. He
did not even preside over its sessions. Usually
he listened silently to the arguments and
resolved most of the arguments by sarcasm,
a half-jovial, meaningful threat, or a brusque
gesture of impatience.
 Stalin’s desire to take total control of the
Soviet state led to the purges of the party, the
armed forces and the general population.
 Individuals who posed a potential challenge
to his rule, such as Trotsky, faced
assassination.
 Stalin’s main motive for the purges of Lenin’s
Old Guard including Trotsky, Bukharin,
Zinoviev and Kamenev, was to destroy the
men who represented the potentiality of
alternative government.
 From the outset Stalin identified any attempt
at creating an alternative government, and
even the thought of this, with counter-
revolution.
 The destruction of all political centres from
which an attempt at counter-revolution
might, in certain circumstances, have been
made, was the direct and undeniable
consequence of the trials.
 The NKVD sought to justify the powers they
received in 1934 by finding conspiracies.
 Gulags were responsible for 10 – 15% of the
Soviet GNP by 1939 and therefore the
economy relied on purging, and ‘enemies’
like Bukharin had been destroyed to win
Stalin’s patronage.
 It was essential that the Soviet Union was
united because of the threat of war presented
by international capitalism in the 1920s and
the aggressive Nazi dictatorship from 1933
which was distinctly anti-communist.
 The prospect of a single-handed fight
between the Soviet Union and Germany
seemed grim in the 1930s. In the First World
War the strength of the German military
machine sufficed to deal a shattering blow to
Russia and to sap Tsardom.
 The shadow of the last Tsar must have been
on Stalin’s mind as he viewed Hitler’s
preparations for war.
 How successful was Stalin’s regime in crushing
diversity in the Soviet Union in the 1930s?
 Political opposition and alternative ideologies were
crushed. Opponents of Stalin’s collectivisation were
expelled from the Communist Party.
 Sergei Kirov defended comrades and called
for a reduction in the speed of collectivisation
and was assassinated in 1934, and the
Congress that supported Kirov was purged.
 As General Secretary of the Communist Party
of the Soviet Union (CPSU), Stalin used his
control over appointments to build a personal
following in the Party apparatus.
 Stalin appointed individual Party secretaries
and gave them security of tenure. In return,
they voted for him at Party Congresses. Stalin
used this power to remove political rivals in
the course of his rise to power.
 However, with the opening of the historical
archives since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991,
new evidence suggests that Party officials pursued
agendas defined by their institutional interests and
not solely by the will of Stalin.
 Recent documents portray a Stalin nagged with
doubts that central directives were being fulfilled.
In this, his immediate subordinates were not the
problem, but the greater mass of the Party and
state bureaucracy responding to impossible
demands with foot-dragging and deception.
 Stalin provided security of tenure to many
Party secretaries. The gravest threat to their
power in the first decade of Soviet power
came from political infighting in local
organisations.
 Stalin won the support of secretaries by
attacking intra-party democracy and
reinforcing their power within their
organisations.
 Many Party secretaries voted for Stalin at
Party Congresses. They helped him defeat his
rivals in the Politburo because they had a
common interest in it, not because they felt
personally beholden to Stalin.
 In the early 1930s, their interests began to
diverge with the crisis of the First Five-Year
Plan, punishing grain collections, famine, and
the emergence of the ‘command-
administrative system’.
 The Party secretaries had helped Stalin to power,
but they may have begun to worry if they had
made the right choice. There was nothing they
could do about it though.
 In attacking intra-Party democracy, they
contributed to a situation in which it was
impossible to question the ‘Central Committee
line’. Since discussion and criticism of central
policy was impossible, footdragging and
subversion were the logical response.
 The 1930s was the time when Stalin achieved
an extreme centralisation of decision-making
functions in the top Party bodies and
ultimately in his own hands.
 The Politburo became less and less a
collective organ of decision-making. Its
formal procedures and routines fell into
disuse and its meetings became less and less
frequent. Informal, ad hoc subgroups of top
leaders made the decisions.
 In 1934 all aspects of internal state security were
co-ordinated in the NKVD (secret police). The
time of the Great Terror began, but the purges
meant not expulsion from the Party, as in the
1920s, but imprisonment, exile or death, with or
without a trial.
 Of the 1,996 delegates attending the Seventeenth
Party Congress in January 1934, 1,108 would
perish in the Great Terror. At this time the Soviet
Union was recovering from the catastrophe of
collectivisation.
 “A long piece of rough towelling was inserted
between the prisoner’s jaws like a bridle; the
ends were then pulled back over his
shoulders and tied to his heels. Just try lying
on your stomach like a wheel, with your spine
breaking – and without water and food for
two days …”
 Trotsky in 1904 was in dispute with Lenin
and commented:
 “Lenin’s methods lead to this: the party
organisation at first substitutes itself for the
party as a whole; then the central committee
substitutes itself for the organisation; and
finally a single ‘dictator’ substitutes himself
for the central committee.”
 The Tsarist political heritage was important
for the consolidation of Stalin’s dictatorship.
 By the nineteenth century Russia was ruled
through an autocratic, centralised,
bureaucratic system. Stalin was following on
from Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great.
 Thus the Tsarist political heritage eased
Stalin’s elaboration of a repressive and
despotic regime.
 Marxism-Leninism’s pretensions to
‘scientific’ knowledge of history’s ‘laws’
rendered the party infallible (a secular
religion), an institution qualitatively different
from and superior to all other political parties
and ideologies; past, present and future.
 Some believe that Stalin may have been
clinically insane.
 Stories of Stalin’s insanity stem from an
examination carried out by the famous
neuropathologist Vladimir Bekhterev in
December 1927. He reportedly told his
colleagues that Stalin suffered from paranoia.
 For Alexander Solzhenitsyn and the historian
Robert Conquest, Stalin really was ‘the Lenin of
today’, but far more brutal, unscrupulous and
cunning than the dead leader.
 Driven on by morbid suspicion, lust for power
and a monstrous ideology Stalin consciously
planned and directed the entire purge process.
He sanctioned Kirov’s murder in 1934 to rid
himself of Politburo ‘moderates’ and used the
excuse of Kirov’s murder to start the Great
Terror.
 Trotsky observed in 1936:
 “The basis of bureaucratic rule is the poverty of
society in objects of consumption …When there
are enough goods in a store, the purchasers can
come whenever they want to. When there are few
goods, the purchasers are compelled to stand in
line.
 When the lines are very long, it is necessary to
appoint a policeman to keep order. Such is the
starting point of the power of the Soviet
bureaucracy.”
 According to Trotsky totalitarianism arose in the
context of domestic backwardness and the
international situation after the Great War.
 It did not arise from Marxist-Leninist ideology or
the party form.
 If the bureaucrats – personified by Stalin – owed
their ascendancy to the belated European
revolution and the Russian proletariat’s
numerical weakness and cultural poverty,
material deprivation caused the bureaucratic
state to metamorphose into a police state.
 Under Stalin’s dictatorship (1928 – 1953),
material scarcity remained.
 Neither the bureaucracy or the police could
solve the country’s social and economic
problems in an egalitarian fashion. Socialism,
the USSR’s legitimating ideology, stood in
opposition to the state form (Stalin’s
dictatorship).
 In George Orwell’s ‘1984’ novel, the one-
party dictatorship have regular, daily ‘Two
Minutes Hate’ sessions against people that
the state describes as ‘scapegoats’ and
‘saboteurs’.
 So also Stalin’s Russia: Stalin resorted to a
‘frame-up system’ (the show trials), and a
medieval witch-hunt for ‘enemies of the
people’ caricatured as ‘Trotskyists’ (real or
imaginary).
 Stalin’s dictatorship abolished the distinction
between public and private life, and this also
disorganised social groupings that may have
menaced the regime.
 Once again, Orwell’s ‘1984’ illustrates this aspect
of Stalin’s Russia perfectly in the secret love
affair between Winston Smith and Julia which is
destroyed by the one-party state. Love between
human beings is a threat to any dictatorship
since a totalitarian regime only wants one form
of loyalty and love – love for the
Motherland/Fatherland/Stalin/Hitler.
 Terror included a psychological dimension. Since
Stalin and the bureaucrats were alienated from
society, paranoia and distrust pervaded the
government.
 Stalin feared rivals in the apparatus, likewise the
officials feared Stalin but each needed the other
because both feared the masses.
 Terror, purging and paranoia thus became
permanent and necessary adjuncts of state
power in the USSR.
 Issac Deutscher, biographer of Trotsky,
stated in ‘Stalin: A Political Biography’ that
Stalin functioned in a country of social and
economic backwardness. Deutscher also
characterised terror as ‘rational’, speculating
that Stalin launched a pre-emptive strike
against Old Bolsheviks, party officials and the
army high command to counter the threat of
a coup d'état should war break out with
Germany.
 Deutscher writes in his biography that Stalin
was probably thinking of 1917 when he
started the Great Terror and show trials. In
1917 government disunity and the army’s
political unreliability were major factors in
tsarism’s collapse.
 By staffing the party-state with inexperienced
cadres and officers completely dependent on
himself, Stalin may have been attempting to
strengthen the regime.
 Deutscher writes that although Stalin was
boundlessly cruel and probably insane, he
played a positive historical role because he
was a great ‘moderniser’, dragging the USSR
into the twentieth century.
 “Russia had been belated in her historical
development. In England serfdom had
disappeared by the end of the fourteenth
century. Stalin’s parents were still serfs.
 “By the standards of British history, the
fourteenth and twentieth centuries have, in a
sense, met …in Stalin. The historian cannot
be seriously surprised if he finds in him some
traits usually associated with tyrants of earlier
centuries.” (Deutscher, Stalin: A Political
Biography, 1972)
 The Soviet dissident historian, Roy Medvedev,
pointed to social and economic factors inherited
from the ancien regime (Tsarist Russia) which
shaped the politics of the 1930s.
 Medvedev lays far greater stress on personality
than other Marxist historians: “The first and most
important was Stalin’s measureless ambition.
This incessant though carefully hidden lust for
power appeared in Stalin much earlier than 1937
(the height of the show trials). Even though he
had great power, it was not enough – he wanted
absolute power and unlimited submission to his
will.”
 Stalin first took revenge upon Zinoviev and Kamenev,
who were accused of conniving in Kirov’s death. Kirov
had been murdered on 1st December 1934. They
agreed to accept moral and political responsibility for
their former minor adherent in return for an
assurance that they would receive a light sentence.
 On Stalin’s orders Zinoviev and Kamenev were
consigned to ten and five years of imprisonment
respectively. Stalin’s prisons were not rest homes. In
addition over 30,000 deportations of members of
social groups regarded as hostile to communism took
place; exile was to bleak Siberian locations.
 According to official records, 681,692 persons
were executed in 1937 – 38. The impact of the
Great Terror was deep and wide and was not
limited to specific political, administrative,
military, cultural, religious and national groups.
 Even a harmless old Russian peasant woman
muttering dissatisfaction with conditions or her
young worker-son complaining about housing
standards would be dispatched to the horrors of
the gulag.
 By 1939 the total number of prisoners in the
forced-labour system was 2.9 million. In each
camp there were gangs of convicted thieves who
were allowed by the authorities to bully the
‘politicals’. The trading of sexual favours was
rife.
 Many inmates would kill or maim a weaker fellow
victim just to rob him of his shoes.
 Stalin continued to expand the scope of the
terror.
 No institution in the Soviet state failed to
incur Stalin’s suspicion. Even Red Army
generals were executed. Stalin’s aim was to
ensure that the armed forces were incapable
of promoting policies in any way different
from his own, and Marshal Tukhachevski,
head of the Red Army, laid himself open to
trouble by arguing for a more adventurous
military strategy for the USSR.
 Stalin’s very success in prosecuting the Great
Terror brought about a crisis. The original
purpose had been to reconstruct the state so
as to secure authority and impose Stalin’s
policies. However, in carrying out the purges,
the executions and imprisonments, Stalin
came close to demolishing the state itself.
 The blood-purge of the armed forces
disrupted the USSR’s defences in a period of
intense international tension.
 The arrest of the economic administrators in
the people’s commissariats impeded
industrial output.
 The destruction of cadres in party, trade
unions and local government undermined
administrative co-ordination.
 This extreme destabilization endangered
Stalin himself. For if the Soviet state fell
apart, Stalin’s career would be at an end.
 Stalin had started the carnage of 1937 – 38
because of real hostility to his policies, real
threats to his authority, a real underlying menace
to the compound of the Soviet order. Yet his
reaction was hysterically out of proportion to the
menace he faced.
 However, Stalin was in his element amidst chaos
and violence, and had learned how to create an
environment of uncertainty wherein only he could
remain a fixed, dominant point of influence.
 Stalin believed in the rapid trainability of
functionaries and experts, and this gave him
equanimity when butchering an entire
administrative stratum.
 No one coming into frequent contact with
him in the late 1930s had a chance to
become disloyal: he had them killed before
such thoughts could enter their heads. He
was unflustered about murder.
 By the late 1930s Stalin was identifying
himself with the great despots of history. He
was fascinated by Genghis Khan, and
underlined the following adage attributed to
him: ‘The deaths of the vanquished are
necessary for the tranquillity of the victors.’
 Other rulers who attracted him included the
previous tsars, Ivan the Terrible and Peter the
Great.
 Stalin continued to admire Lenin even though
Lenin on his death-bed wished to sack him from
the General Secretaryship.
 Lenin’s ideas on violence, dictatorship, terror,
centralism, hierarchy and leadership were
integral to Stalin’s thinking.
 Lenin had bequeathed to Stalin the system of
terror – the Cheka (secret police), the forced-
labour camps, the one-party state, the
prohibition of free and popular elections, the ban
on internal party dissent.
 It is hard to imagine Lenin carrying out a
terror upon his own party.
 Nor was he likely to have insisted on the
physical and psychological degradation of
those arrested by the political police.
 Lenin would have been horrified by the scale
and methods of the Great Terror.
 The Soviet regime had always been desperately
insecure. Except for a brief moment in the
October Revolution and perhaps in the Civil War,
the Bolsheviks could never be sure of a popular
mandate.
 The frail peace of the New Economic Policy (NEP)
1921 – 28 was accompanied by a belief that
matters were balanced on a knife edge. Anxiety
increased once the risky adventures of
collectivisation and forced industrialisation
commenced.
 Foreign powers (Britain, France, Germany,
Japan, the United States) remained hostile to
the new communist state. The Civil War had
not been forgotten.
 Émigrés in a dozen European capitals
conspired against the regime. Peasants rose
against the government. Nationalist
sentiment had not been suddenly
extinguished.
 The state was a central and ubiquitous
presence.
 It was the formal distributor of goods and the
near-monopolistic producer of them, so that
even the black market traded in state goods.
 All urban citizens worked for the state. There
were virtually no other alternative employers.
 The state was a tireless regulator of life, issuing
and demanding an endless stream of documents
and permits without which the simplest
operations of daily life were impossible.
 As everybody including the leaders admitted, the
Soviet bureaucracy, recently greatly expanded
under Stalin to cope with its new range of tasks
and thus full of inexperienced and unqualified
officials, was slow, cumbersome, inefficient, and
corrupt.
 Law and legal process were held in low
regard, and the actions of officialdom were
marked by arbitrariness and favouritism.
 Citizens felt themselves at the mercy of
officials and the regime; they speculated
endlessly about the people “up there” and
what new surprises they might have in store
for the population, but felt powerless to
influence them.
 1 Communist Party rule
 2 Marxist-Leninist ideology
 3 Rampant bureaucracy
 4 Leader cults
 5 State control over production and
distribution
 6 Social engineering
 7 Affirmative action on behalf of workers
 8 Stigmatization of “class enemies”
 9 Police surveillance
 10 State terror
 11 Various informal, personalistic
arrangements whereby people at every level
sought to protect themselves and obtain
scarce goods
 Collectivisation and the First Five-Year Plan
(1929 – 32) marked the start of Stalin’s
revolution: the transformation of the Soviet
Union into an industrial great power.
 The outcome of the First World War resulted in
the dominance of the world economy by the
United States. By 1918, only two global powers
remained, the British Empire and the United
States. If the Soviet Union wished to gain
independence from the American-dominated
world economic system, it had to industrialise
quickly within ten years.
 With the devastation and geo-political shift of
the First World War, the age of European power
came to an end. The European powers were no
longer the world’s overlord. The empires of
Germany, Russia, Austria-Hungary, and the
Ottomans had come to an end. France, also,
ceased to be a great power of the first rank.
 Trotsky warned of a ‘Balkanised Europe' under
the domination of the new super-power, the
United States, just as the countries of south-
eastern Europe had once been under the
domination of Britain and France.
 Hitler warned in 1928, the ‘threatened global hegemony of
the North American continent’ would reduce all the states of
Europe to the status of Switzerland or Holland.
 The United States was a power unlike any other, a novel kind
of ‘super-state’. It was precisely the looming potential after
1918, the future dominance of American capitalist
democracy, that was the common factor impelling Hitler,
Stalin, Mussolini, and Imperial Japan to such radical action.
 All of them saw themselves as radical insurgents against an
oppressive and powerful world order dominated by the
United States and the British Empire.
 National power in the early twentieth century was
measured in the currency of battleships. The
rations of geostrategic power were fixed at the
Washington Naval Conference in 1922 in the
ratio of 10:10:6:3:3. At the head stood Britain
and the United States, accorded equal status as
the only truly global powers.
 Japan was granted third place as a one-ocean
power confined to the Pacific. France and Italy
were relegated to the east Atlantic and the
Mediterranean. Germany and Russia were not
even considered as conference participants.
 The purpose for Stalin and his First Five-Year
Plan (1929 – 32) was rapid economic
development using state planning and laying
the foundations for socialism by rooting out
private enterprise.
 The Plan involved massive investment in
heavy industry, skimping in the area of
consumer goods, and substantial involuntary
sacrifice of living standards by the general
population to pay for it all.
 From the start of the Five-Year plan in 1929,
Soviet borders were closed to people and goods
from the world market, and the country declared
its intention of achieving “economic autarchy.” In
the short term, this move had the beneficial
effect of cutting the Soviet Union off from the
Great Depression.
 In the long term, however, it set the stage for a
retreat into suspicious, parochial isolation that
was reminiscent of Muscovite Russia in the
sixteenth century.
 Increased suspicion of foreign enemies was
matched by a sharp rise in hostility to “class
enemies” at home: kulaks (rich peasants),
priests, members of the pre-revolutionary
nobility, former capitalists. In the Communist
view all these groups were natural opponents
of the Soviet state.
 A cultural revolution took place against
members of the pre-revolutionary
intelligentsia, known as “bourgeois
specialists.”
 During the New Economic Policy, Lenin had
insisted on the state’s need for the
specialists’ expertise, even though
recommending that they be supervised
closely by Communists.
 From spring 1928, groups of engineers were
charged with “wrecking” (intentionally
damaging the Soviet economy) and
treasonous contacts with foreign capitalists
and intelligence services.
 Stalin announced the urgent need for the
Soviet Union to acquire its own “workers’ and
peasants’ intelligentsia” to replace the
“bourgeois intelligentsia” inherited from the
Tsarist regime.
 Stalin initiated a major program for sending
workers, peasants, and young Communists to
higher education, particularly engineering
school, so that they could prepare for
leadership in the new society.
 The beneficiaries of the program achieved
rapid promotion during the Great Purges and
constituted a long-lasting political elite – the
“Brezhnev generation” – whose tenure in
power lasted until the 1980s.
 Following the Five-Year Plans and the Soviet
victory in the Second World War against Nazi
Germany, the Soviet Union became part of the
established order within the international
system.
 Marxism-Leninism served to legitimate an
established order, an established social and
political system, the dictatorship of Stalin and
his successors.
 Despite the predications of Marx and Engels, the
state in the Soviet Union was very far from
withering away under Stalin and his successors.
 The official Soviet account said that the state did
not disappear until the achievement of full
communism. Socialism was only a stage in the
development towards communism and the state
was necessary to protect the gains already made
and ensure the continued development towards
communism.
 Under Stalin, the Communist Party became
the supreme force in the Soviet Union. The
annual anniversary parades in Red Square to
mark the October Revolution personified this.
 Attempts to question the ‘leading role’ of the
Communist Party brought about the invasion
of Czechoslovakia in 1968 and the
introduction of marital law in Poland in 1981.
 The first generation of communists, Lenin’s
colleagues, were intellectuals of middle-class
background who joined the Party when adult.
 The second generation, those of the 1930s and
1940s, were more men of peasant background who
joined the Party early in life. They had little higher
education and specialised in coercive political
organisation.
 In the post-Stalin period after 1953, the Party came
to be dominated by men with a very high degree of
technical education, specialists in administration and
business management.
 Life in Russia, later the Soviet Union, from the
First World War and Russian Civil War, was
unpredictable. Huge numbers of people were
uprooted geographically and socially, losing
touch with family and friends, working in
occupations different from the ones that had
seemed marked out for them.
 The October Revolution opened doors for
advancement for some people, closed them for
others. Stalin’s revolution in the 1930s shattered
routines and expectations.
 Despite its promises of future abundance and
massive propaganda of its current
achievements, the Stalinist regime did little to
improve the life of its people in the 1930s.
 The NKVD’s soundings of public opinion, the
Stalinist regime was relatively though not
desperately unpopular in Russian towns. In
Russian villages its unpopularity was much
greater due to collectivisation and famine.
 Overall, as the NKVD regularly reported and
official statements repeated, the ordinary “little
man” in Soviet towns, who thought only of his
own and his family’s welfare, was “dissatisfied
with Soviet power,” though in a fatalistic and
passive manner.
 The post-NEP situation was compared
unfavourably with NEP, and Stalin – despite the
officially fostered Stalin cult – was compared
unfavourably with Lenin, sometimes because he
was more repressive but more often because he
let the people go hungry.

More Related Content

What's hot

CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE PRINCIPAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE PRINCIPAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTYCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE PRINCIPAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE PRINCIPAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
George Dumitrache
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: LEON TROTSKY
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: LEON TROTSKYCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: LEON TROTSKY
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: LEON TROTSKY
George Dumitrache
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN IMPACT ON CULTURE
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN IMPACT ON CULTURECAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN IMPACT ON CULTURE
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN IMPACT ON CULTURE
George Dumitrache
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN PERSONAL REPUTATION
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN PERSONAL REPUTATIONCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN PERSONAL REPUTATION
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN PERSONAL REPUTATION
George Dumitrache
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: SHOW TRIALS AND THE GREAT PURGE
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: SHOW TRIALS AND THE GREAT PURGECAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: SHOW TRIALS AND THE GREAT PURGE
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: SHOW TRIALS AND THE GREAT PURGE
George Dumitrache
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TOTALITARIANISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TOTALITARIANISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIACAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TOTALITARIANISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TOTALITARIANISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA
George Dumitrache
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERSCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
George Dumitrache
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE SECRETARIAT UNDER STALIN
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE SECRETARIAT UNDER STALINCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE SECRETARIAT UNDER STALIN
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE SECRETARIAT UNDER STALIN
George Dumitrache
 
Stalin rise to power
Stalin rise to powerStalin rise to power
Stalin rise to power
Elizabeth Lugones
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE SECRETARIAL BEFORE STALIN
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE SECRETARIAL BEFORE STALINCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE SECRETARIAL BEFORE STALIN
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE SECRETARIAL BEFORE STALIN
George Dumitrache
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: HEALTH, EDUCATION, WOMEN, RELIGION
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: HEALTH, EDUCATION, WOMEN, RELIGIONCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: HEALTH, EDUCATION, WOMEN, RELIGION
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: HEALTH, EDUCATION, WOMEN, RELIGION
George Dumitrache
 
STALIN PART 2:Totalitarianism and stalin
STALIN PART 2:Totalitarianism and stalinSTALIN PART 2:Totalitarianism and stalin
STALIN PART 2:Totalitarianism and stalin
Elizabeth Lugones
 
Lenin final
Lenin finalLenin final
Lenin final
milgautam
 
STALIN PART 2: Stalin's Russia
STALIN PART 2: Stalin's RussiaSTALIN PART 2: Stalin's Russia
STALIN PART 2: Stalin's Russia
Elizabeth Lugones
 
Stalin\ S Rise To Power
Stalin\ S Rise To PowerStalin\ S Rise To Power
Stalin\ S Rise To Powervikhist
 
Stalin's Rise to Power
Stalin's Rise to PowerStalin's Rise to Power
Stalin's Rise to Power
Elizabeth Lugones
 
Lenin revolution ppt
Lenin revolution pptLenin revolution ppt
Lenin revolution ppt
TamilThoughts
 
Vladimir lenin
Vladimir leninVladimir lenin
Vladimir lenin
SofiMele
 

What's hot (20)

CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE PRINCIPAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE PRINCIPAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTYCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE PRINCIPAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE PRINCIPAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: LEON TROTSKY
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: LEON TROTSKYCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: LEON TROTSKY
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: LEON TROTSKY
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN IMPACT ON CULTURE
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN IMPACT ON CULTURECAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN IMPACT ON CULTURE
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN IMPACT ON CULTURE
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN PERSONAL REPUTATION
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN PERSONAL REPUTATIONCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN PERSONAL REPUTATION
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN PERSONAL REPUTATION
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: SHOW TRIALS AND THE GREAT PURGE
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: SHOW TRIALS AND THE GREAT PURGECAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: SHOW TRIALS AND THE GREAT PURGE
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: SHOW TRIALS AND THE GREAT PURGE
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TOTALITARIANISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TOTALITARIANISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIACAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TOTALITARIANISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TOTALITARIANISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERSCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: STALIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE SECRETARIAT UNDER STALIN
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE SECRETARIAT UNDER STALINCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE SECRETARIAT UNDER STALIN
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE SECRETARIAT UNDER STALIN
 
Stalin rise to power
Stalin rise to powerStalin rise to power
Stalin rise to power
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE SECRETARIAL BEFORE STALIN
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE SECRETARIAL BEFORE STALINCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE SECRETARIAL BEFORE STALIN
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE SECRETARIAL BEFORE STALIN
 
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: HEALTH, EDUCATION, WOMEN, RELIGION
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: HEALTH, EDUCATION, WOMEN, RELIGIONCAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: HEALTH, EDUCATION, WOMEN, RELIGION
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: HEALTH, EDUCATION, WOMEN, RELIGION
 
STALIN PART 2:Totalitarianism and stalin
STALIN PART 2:Totalitarianism and stalinSTALIN PART 2:Totalitarianism and stalin
STALIN PART 2:Totalitarianism and stalin
 
Lenin final
Lenin finalLenin final
Lenin final
 
STALIN PART 2: Stalin's Russia
STALIN PART 2: Stalin's RussiaSTALIN PART 2: Stalin's Russia
STALIN PART 2: Stalin's Russia
 
Stalin\ S Rise To Power
Stalin\ S Rise To PowerStalin\ S Rise To Power
Stalin\ S Rise To Power
 
Stalin's Rise to Power
Stalin's Rise to PowerStalin's Rise to Power
Stalin's Rise to Power
 
Lenin revolution ppt
Lenin revolution pptLenin revolution ppt
Lenin revolution ppt
 
Vladimir lenin
Vladimir leninVladimir lenin
Vladimir lenin
 
Joseph stalin
Joseph stalinJoseph stalin
Joseph stalin
 
Joseph stalin
Joseph stalinJoseph stalin
Joseph stalin
 

Similar to History Stalin Totalitarian Ideology 2015 AQA

Stalin In Power Essay
Stalin In Power EssayStalin In Power Essay
Stalin In Power Essay
Tiffany Sandoval
 
Rise of the dictators
Rise of the dictatorsRise of the dictators
Rise of the dictators
afrancksjrcs
 
Rejection of liberalism
Rejection of liberalismRejection of liberalism
Rejection of liberalismG_Tweedy
 
The russian revolution
The russian revolutionThe russian revolution
The russian revolutionkv1 halwara
 
AA 4 RH Y3 Russian/ Soviet History Class 4, Fall 2010 - Spring 2011 part 3, s...
AA 4 RH Y3 Russian/ Soviet History Class 4, Fall 2010 - Spring 2011 part 3, s...AA 4 RH Y3 Russian/ Soviet History Class 4, Fall 2010 - Spring 2011 part 3, s...
Rejection of liberalism
Rejection of liberalismRejection of liberalism
Rejection of liberalismG_Tweedy
 
Impact Of Stalinism
Impact Of StalinismImpact Of Stalinism
Impact Of Stalinism
Stephanie Clark
 
Joseph Stalin Essay
Joseph Stalin EssayJoseph Stalin Essay
Joseph Stalin Essay
Cheapest Paper Writing Service
 
Joseph Stalin Ambition
Joseph Stalin AmbitionJoseph Stalin Ambition
Ivan Denisovich
Ivan DenisovichIvan Denisovich
Ivan Denisovich
Sandra Arveseth
 

Similar to History Stalin Totalitarian Ideology 2015 AQA (11)

Stalin In Power Essay
Stalin In Power EssayStalin In Power Essay
Stalin In Power Essay
 
Psc 433 paper
Psc 433 paperPsc 433 paper
Psc 433 paper
 
Rise of the dictators
Rise of the dictatorsRise of the dictators
Rise of the dictators
 
Rejection of liberalism
Rejection of liberalismRejection of liberalism
Rejection of liberalism
 
The russian revolution
The russian revolutionThe russian revolution
The russian revolution
 
AA 4 RH Y3 Russian/ Soviet History Class 4, Fall 2010 - Spring 2011 part 3, s...
AA 4 RH Y3 Russian/ Soviet History Class 4, Fall 2010 - Spring 2011 part 3, s...AA 4 RH Y3 Russian/ Soviet History Class 4, Fall 2010 - Spring 2011 part 3, s...
AA 4 RH Y3 Russian/ Soviet History Class 4, Fall 2010 - Spring 2011 part 3, s...
 
Rejection of liberalism
Rejection of liberalismRejection of liberalism
Rejection of liberalism
 
Impact Of Stalinism
Impact Of StalinismImpact Of Stalinism
Impact Of Stalinism
 
Joseph Stalin Essay
Joseph Stalin EssayJoseph Stalin Essay
Joseph Stalin Essay
 
Joseph Stalin Ambition
Joseph Stalin AmbitionJoseph Stalin Ambition
Joseph Stalin Ambition
 
Ivan Denisovich
Ivan DenisovichIvan Denisovich
Ivan Denisovich
 

More from NeilCharlesGardner

Making Modern UK Economic Policy under Margaret Thatcher 1979 to 1990
Making Modern UK Economic Policy under Margaret Thatcher 1979 to 1990Making Modern UK Economic Policy under Margaret Thatcher 1979 to 1990
Making Modern UK Economic Policy under Margaret Thatcher 1979 to 1990NeilCharlesGardner
 
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015NeilCharlesGardner
 
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015NeilCharlesGardner
 
Making of Modern UK Margaret Thatchers Governments and New Labour
Making of Modern UK  Margaret Thatchers Governments and New LabourMaking of Modern UK  Margaret Thatchers Governments and New Labour
Making of Modern UK Margaret Thatchers Governments and New LabourNeilCharlesGardner
 
Making of Modern Britain Women and equality
Making of Modern Britain Women and equalityMaking of Modern Britain Women and equality
Making of Modern Britain Women and equalityNeilCharlesGardner
 
Making of Modern Britain World Role after 1945
Making of Modern Britain World Role after 1945Making of Modern Britain World Role after 1945
Making of Modern Britain World Role after 1945NeilCharlesGardner
 
Making of Modern Britain including Education and Feminism copy
Making of Modern Britain including Education and Feminism copyMaking of Modern Britain including Education and Feminism copy
Making of Modern Britain including Education and Feminism copyNeilCharlesGardner
 
Making of Modern Britain Wilson Governments 1964 to 1970
Making of Modern Britain Wilson Governments 1964 to 1970Making of Modern Britain Wilson Governments 1964 to 1970
Making of Modern Britain Wilson Governments 1964 to 1970NeilCharlesGardner
 
Vietnam Why did America lose the Vietnam War AQA
Vietnam Why did America lose the Vietnam War AQAVietnam Why did America lose the Vietnam War AQA
Vietnam Why did America lose the Vietnam War AQANeilCharlesGardner
 
Watergate and Nixon 19 May 2015 N C Gardner BA Hons MA PGCE
Watergate and Nixon 19 May 2015 N C Gardner BA Hons MA PGCEWatergate and Nixon 19 May 2015 N C Gardner BA Hons MA PGCE
Watergate and Nixon 19 May 2015 N C Gardner BA Hons MA PGCENeilCharlesGardner
 
Vietnam President Richard Nixon and the war 15 April 2015
Vietnam President Richard Nixon and the war 15 April 2015Vietnam President Richard Nixon and the war 15 April 2015
Vietnam President Richard Nixon and the war 15 April 2015NeilCharlesGardner
 
Making UK The Age of Affluence 1955 to 1976
Making UK The Age of Affluence 1955 to 1976Making UK The Age of Affluence 1955 to 1976
Making UK The Age of Affluence 1955 to 1976NeilCharlesGardner
 
History Hitlers Germany 29 April 2015 Neil Gardner MA PGCE
History Hitlers Germany 29 April 2015 Neil Gardner MA PGCEHistory Hitlers Germany 29 April 2015 Neil Gardner MA PGCE
History Hitlers Germany 29 April 2015 Neil Gardner MA PGCENeilCharlesGardner
 
Making Modern UK Social Classes in Modern Britain
Making Modern UK Social Classes in Modern BritainMaking Modern UK Social Classes in Modern Britain
Making Modern UK Social Classes in Modern BritainNeilCharlesGardner
 
Making of Modern UK Thatcher and Legacy of New Labour and Murdoch press
Making of Modern UK  Thatcher and Legacy of New Labour and Murdoch pressMaking of Modern UK  Thatcher and Legacy of New Labour and Murdoch press
Making of Modern UK Thatcher and Legacy of New Labour and Murdoch pressNeilCharlesGardner
 
Making of Modern UK 11th September 2015 Suez Profumo Education Feminism
Making of Modern UK 11th September 2015 Suez Profumo Education FeminismMaking of Modern UK 11th September 2015 Suez Profumo Education Feminism
Making of Modern UK 11th September 2015 Suez Profumo Education FeminismNeilCharlesGardner
 
Making Modern UK Tony Blair and New Labour 1997 to 2007 N C Gardner MA PGCE
Making Modern UK Tony Blair and New Labour 1997 to 2007 N C Gardner MA PGCEMaking Modern UK Tony Blair and New Labour 1997 to 2007 N C Gardner MA PGCE
Making Modern UK Tony Blair and New Labour 1997 to 2007 N C Gardner MA PGCENeilCharlesGardner
 
History USSR 1922 to 1929 N C Gardner 22 April 2015
History USSR 1922 to 1929 N C Gardner 22 April 2015History USSR 1922 to 1929 N C Gardner 22 April 2015
History USSR 1922 to 1929 N C Gardner 22 April 2015NeilCharlesGardner
 
Making of Modern Britain Sixties and Social Change 15 September 2015
Making of Modern Britain Sixties and Social Change 15 September 2015Making of Modern Britain Sixties and Social Change 15 September 2015
Making of Modern Britain Sixties and Social Change 15 September 2015NeilCharlesGardner
 

More from NeilCharlesGardner (20)

Making Modern UK Economic Policy under Margaret Thatcher 1979 to 1990
Making Modern UK Economic Policy under Margaret Thatcher 1979 to 1990Making Modern UK Economic Policy under Margaret Thatcher 1979 to 1990
Making Modern UK Economic Policy under Margaret Thatcher 1979 to 1990
 
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
 
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
Neil Gardner The Pension Changes of 2015
 
Making of Modern UK Margaret Thatchers Governments and New Labour
Making of Modern UK  Margaret Thatchers Governments and New LabourMaking of Modern UK  Margaret Thatchers Governments and New Labour
Making of Modern UK Margaret Thatchers Governments and New Labour
 
Making of Modern Britain Women and equality
Making of Modern Britain Women and equalityMaking of Modern Britain Women and equality
Making of Modern Britain Women and equality
 
Making of Modern Britain World Role after 1945
Making of Modern Britain World Role after 1945Making of Modern Britain World Role after 1945
Making of Modern Britain World Role after 1945
 
Making of Modern Britain including Education and Feminism copy
Making of Modern Britain including Education and Feminism copyMaking of Modern Britain including Education and Feminism copy
Making of Modern Britain including Education and Feminism copy
 
Making of Modern Britain Wilson Governments 1964 to 1970
Making of Modern Britain Wilson Governments 1964 to 1970Making of Modern Britain Wilson Governments 1964 to 1970
Making of Modern Britain Wilson Governments 1964 to 1970
 
Study Skills topics covered
Study Skills topics coveredStudy Skills topics covered
Study Skills topics covered
 
Vietnam Why did America lose the Vietnam War AQA
Vietnam Why did America lose the Vietnam War AQAVietnam Why did America lose the Vietnam War AQA
Vietnam Why did America lose the Vietnam War AQA
 
Watergate and Nixon 19 May 2015 N C Gardner BA Hons MA PGCE
Watergate and Nixon 19 May 2015 N C Gardner BA Hons MA PGCEWatergate and Nixon 19 May 2015 N C Gardner BA Hons MA PGCE
Watergate and Nixon 19 May 2015 N C Gardner BA Hons MA PGCE
 
Vietnam President Richard Nixon and the war 15 April 2015
Vietnam President Richard Nixon and the war 15 April 2015Vietnam President Richard Nixon and the war 15 April 2015
Vietnam President Richard Nixon and the war 15 April 2015
 
Making UK The Age of Affluence 1955 to 1976
Making UK The Age of Affluence 1955 to 1976Making UK The Age of Affluence 1955 to 1976
Making UK The Age of Affluence 1955 to 1976
 
History Hitlers Germany 29 April 2015 Neil Gardner MA PGCE
History Hitlers Germany 29 April 2015 Neil Gardner MA PGCEHistory Hitlers Germany 29 April 2015 Neil Gardner MA PGCE
History Hitlers Germany 29 April 2015 Neil Gardner MA PGCE
 
Making Modern UK Social Classes in Modern Britain
Making Modern UK Social Classes in Modern BritainMaking Modern UK Social Classes in Modern Britain
Making Modern UK Social Classes in Modern Britain
 
Making of Modern UK Thatcher and Legacy of New Labour and Murdoch press
Making of Modern UK  Thatcher and Legacy of New Labour and Murdoch pressMaking of Modern UK  Thatcher and Legacy of New Labour and Murdoch press
Making of Modern UK Thatcher and Legacy of New Labour and Murdoch press
 
Making of Modern UK 11th September 2015 Suez Profumo Education Feminism
Making of Modern UK 11th September 2015 Suez Profumo Education FeminismMaking of Modern UK 11th September 2015 Suez Profumo Education Feminism
Making of Modern UK 11th September 2015 Suez Profumo Education Feminism
 
Making Modern UK Tony Blair and New Labour 1997 to 2007 N C Gardner MA PGCE
Making Modern UK Tony Blair and New Labour 1997 to 2007 N C Gardner MA PGCEMaking Modern UK Tony Blair and New Labour 1997 to 2007 N C Gardner MA PGCE
Making Modern UK Tony Blair and New Labour 1997 to 2007 N C Gardner MA PGCE
 
History USSR 1922 to 1929 N C Gardner 22 April 2015
History USSR 1922 to 1929 N C Gardner 22 April 2015History USSR 1922 to 1929 N C Gardner 22 April 2015
History USSR 1922 to 1929 N C Gardner 22 April 2015
 
Making of Modern Britain Sixties and Social Change 15 September 2015
Making of Modern Britain Sixties and Social Change 15 September 2015Making of Modern Britain Sixties and Social Change 15 September 2015
Making of Modern Britain Sixties and Social Change 15 September 2015
 

History Stalin Totalitarian Ideology 2015 AQA

  • 1. AQA His1N N C Gardner MA PGCE
  • 2.
  • 3.  Psychological need: there was a psychological need for a single leader to follow and worship.  The Tsars of Russia had been worshipped as fathers of the nation, with icons in homes – Stalin now acted in place of the Tsar.  Stalin created a Cult of Lenin after Lenin’s death in January 1924. To millions of peasants, whose religious instincts were repressed under the revolution, the Lenin Mausoleum soon became a place of pilgrimage.
  • 4.
  • 5.  Stalin was personally responsible for the creation of the cult – he defied Lenin, who had also filled the psychological role as leader, and then used the Lenin legacy to make himself the ‘Lenin of Today’.  Just as original Christianity, as it was spreading into pagan countries, absorbed elements of pagan beliefs and rites and blended them with its own ideas, so now Marxism, the product of western European thought, was absorbing elements of the Byzantine tradition, so deeply ingrained in Russia.
  • 6.
  • 7.  Gigantic busts and portraits at every corner, speeches on artistic and scientific subjects glorified Stalin.  Cities and streets named in honour of Lenin and Stalin (Leningrad and Stalingrad) helped create the cult.
  • 8.
  • 9.  The abstract ideas of Marxism could exist, in their purity, in the brains of intellectual revolutionaries, especially those who had lived as exiles in western Europe before the revolution.  Now, after the doctrine had really been transplanted to Russia and come to dominate the outlook of a great nation, it could assimilate itself to that nation’s spiritual climate, to its traditions, customs, and habits.
  • 10.  Stalin supported every contention of his with a quotation from Lenin, sometimes out of context, in the same way that medieval scholars had sought sanction for their speculations in the holy writ of the Bible.  Lenin had also sometimes backed his arguments with all too frequent references to Marx. Stalin might as well have said: “Give me a quotation from Lenin and I will move the earth.”
  • 11.
  • 12.  As the cult of Stalin grew it became more difficult to resist as people wished to follow their neighbours and take part in mass activities.  People genuinely wished to thank Stalin for material improvements in their lives, such as the end of rationing in 1935, extended education and the removal of ‘enemies of the people’ in the purges of the 1930s.
  • 13.
  • 14.  There was an element of fear in existence in the Soviet Union in the 1930s due to the purges, show trials and NKVD arrests that meant that some people would feel pressured into supporting the cult of Stalin.
  • 15.  Under Stalin’s dictatorship the revolutionary elements inherited from Lenin combined with Russian traditions.  Like Cromwell as Lord Protector or Napoleon as Emperor of the French, Stalin became the guardian and the trustee of the revolution. He consolidated its gains and extended them. He ‘built socialism’; and even his opponents, while denouncing his autocracy, admitted that most of his economic reforms were indeed essential for socialism.
  • 16.
  • 17.  Stalin’s technique of power revealed his distrustful attitude towards society, his pessimistic approach to it. Socialism was to be built by coercion rather than persuasion.  Stalin had the last word in the Politbureau. He did not even preside over its sessions. Usually he listened silently to the arguments and resolved most of the arguments by sarcasm, a half-jovial, meaningful threat, or a brusque gesture of impatience.
  • 18.  Stalin’s desire to take total control of the Soviet state led to the purges of the party, the armed forces and the general population.  Individuals who posed a potential challenge to his rule, such as Trotsky, faced assassination.
  • 19.
  • 20.  Stalin’s main motive for the purges of Lenin’s Old Guard including Trotsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev, was to destroy the men who represented the potentiality of alternative government.  From the outset Stalin identified any attempt at creating an alternative government, and even the thought of this, with counter- revolution.
  • 21.
  • 22.  The destruction of all political centres from which an attempt at counter-revolution might, in certain circumstances, have been made, was the direct and undeniable consequence of the trials.
  • 23.  The NKVD sought to justify the powers they received in 1934 by finding conspiracies.  Gulags were responsible for 10 – 15% of the Soviet GNP by 1939 and therefore the economy relied on purging, and ‘enemies’ like Bukharin had been destroyed to win Stalin’s patronage.
  • 24.
  • 25.  It was essential that the Soviet Union was united because of the threat of war presented by international capitalism in the 1920s and the aggressive Nazi dictatorship from 1933 which was distinctly anti-communist.
  • 26.  The prospect of a single-handed fight between the Soviet Union and Germany seemed grim in the 1930s. In the First World War the strength of the German military machine sufficed to deal a shattering blow to Russia and to sap Tsardom.  The shadow of the last Tsar must have been on Stalin’s mind as he viewed Hitler’s preparations for war.
  • 27.
  • 28.  How successful was Stalin’s regime in crushing diversity in the Soviet Union in the 1930s?  Political opposition and alternative ideologies were crushed. Opponents of Stalin’s collectivisation were expelled from the Communist Party.  Sergei Kirov defended comrades and called for a reduction in the speed of collectivisation and was assassinated in 1934, and the Congress that supported Kirov was purged.
  • 29.
  • 30.  As General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), Stalin used his control over appointments to build a personal following in the Party apparatus.  Stalin appointed individual Party secretaries and gave them security of tenure. In return, they voted for him at Party Congresses. Stalin used this power to remove political rivals in the course of his rise to power.
  • 31.
  • 32.  However, with the opening of the historical archives since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, new evidence suggests that Party officials pursued agendas defined by their institutional interests and not solely by the will of Stalin.  Recent documents portray a Stalin nagged with doubts that central directives were being fulfilled. In this, his immediate subordinates were not the problem, but the greater mass of the Party and state bureaucracy responding to impossible demands with foot-dragging and deception.
  • 33.  Stalin provided security of tenure to many Party secretaries. The gravest threat to their power in the first decade of Soviet power came from political infighting in local organisations.  Stalin won the support of secretaries by attacking intra-party democracy and reinforcing their power within their organisations.
  • 34.
  • 35.  Many Party secretaries voted for Stalin at Party Congresses. They helped him defeat his rivals in the Politburo because they had a common interest in it, not because they felt personally beholden to Stalin.  In the early 1930s, their interests began to diverge with the crisis of the First Five-Year Plan, punishing grain collections, famine, and the emergence of the ‘command- administrative system’.
  • 36.  The Party secretaries had helped Stalin to power, but they may have begun to worry if they had made the right choice. There was nothing they could do about it though.  In attacking intra-Party democracy, they contributed to a situation in which it was impossible to question the ‘Central Committee line’. Since discussion and criticism of central policy was impossible, footdragging and subversion were the logical response.
  • 37.
  • 38.  The 1930s was the time when Stalin achieved an extreme centralisation of decision-making functions in the top Party bodies and ultimately in his own hands.  The Politburo became less and less a collective organ of decision-making. Its formal procedures and routines fell into disuse and its meetings became less and less frequent. Informal, ad hoc subgroups of top leaders made the decisions.
  • 39.  In 1934 all aspects of internal state security were co-ordinated in the NKVD (secret police). The time of the Great Terror began, but the purges meant not expulsion from the Party, as in the 1920s, but imprisonment, exile or death, with or without a trial.  Of the 1,996 delegates attending the Seventeenth Party Congress in January 1934, 1,108 would perish in the Great Terror. At this time the Soviet Union was recovering from the catastrophe of collectivisation.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.  “A long piece of rough towelling was inserted between the prisoner’s jaws like a bridle; the ends were then pulled back over his shoulders and tied to his heels. Just try lying on your stomach like a wheel, with your spine breaking – and without water and food for two days …”
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.  Trotsky in 1904 was in dispute with Lenin and commented:  “Lenin’s methods lead to this: the party organisation at first substitutes itself for the party as a whole; then the central committee substitutes itself for the organisation; and finally a single ‘dictator’ substitutes himself for the central committee.”
  • 48.  The Tsarist political heritage was important for the consolidation of Stalin’s dictatorship.  By the nineteenth century Russia was ruled through an autocratic, centralised, bureaucratic system. Stalin was following on from Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great.  Thus the Tsarist political heritage eased Stalin’s elaboration of a repressive and despotic regime.
  • 49.
  • 50.  Marxism-Leninism’s pretensions to ‘scientific’ knowledge of history’s ‘laws’ rendered the party infallible (a secular religion), an institution qualitatively different from and superior to all other political parties and ideologies; past, present and future.
  • 51.  Some believe that Stalin may have been clinically insane.  Stories of Stalin’s insanity stem from an examination carried out by the famous neuropathologist Vladimir Bekhterev in December 1927. He reportedly told his colleagues that Stalin suffered from paranoia.
  • 52.  For Alexander Solzhenitsyn and the historian Robert Conquest, Stalin really was ‘the Lenin of today’, but far more brutal, unscrupulous and cunning than the dead leader.  Driven on by morbid suspicion, lust for power and a monstrous ideology Stalin consciously planned and directed the entire purge process. He sanctioned Kirov’s murder in 1934 to rid himself of Politburo ‘moderates’ and used the excuse of Kirov’s murder to start the Great Terror.
  • 53.
  • 54.  Trotsky observed in 1936:  “The basis of bureaucratic rule is the poverty of society in objects of consumption …When there are enough goods in a store, the purchasers can come whenever they want to. When there are few goods, the purchasers are compelled to stand in line.  When the lines are very long, it is necessary to appoint a policeman to keep order. Such is the starting point of the power of the Soviet bureaucracy.”
  • 55.  According to Trotsky totalitarianism arose in the context of domestic backwardness and the international situation after the Great War.  It did not arise from Marxist-Leninist ideology or the party form.  If the bureaucrats – personified by Stalin – owed their ascendancy to the belated European revolution and the Russian proletariat’s numerical weakness and cultural poverty, material deprivation caused the bureaucratic state to metamorphose into a police state.
  • 56.
  • 57.  Under Stalin’s dictatorship (1928 – 1953), material scarcity remained.  Neither the bureaucracy or the police could solve the country’s social and economic problems in an egalitarian fashion. Socialism, the USSR’s legitimating ideology, stood in opposition to the state form (Stalin’s dictatorship).
  • 58.  In George Orwell’s ‘1984’ novel, the one- party dictatorship have regular, daily ‘Two Minutes Hate’ sessions against people that the state describes as ‘scapegoats’ and ‘saboteurs’.  So also Stalin’s Russia: Stalin resorted to a ‘frame-up system’ (the show trials), and a medieval witch-hunt for ‘enemies of the people’ caricatured as ‘Trotskyists’ (real or imaginary).
  • 59.  Stalin’s dictatorship abolished the distinction between public and private life, and this also disorganised social groupings that may have menaced the regime.  Once again, Orwell’s ‘1984’ illustrates this aspect of Stalin’s Russia perfectly in the secret love affair between Winston Smith and Julia which is destroyed by the one-party state. Love between human beings is a threat to any dictatorship since a totalitarian regime only wants one form of loyalty and love – love for the Motherland/Fatherland/Stalin/Hitler.
  • 60.
  • 61.
  • 62.
  • 63.  Terror included a psychological dimension. Since Stalin and the bureaucrats were alienated from society, paranoia and distrust pervaded the government.  Stalin feared rivals in the apparatus, likewise the officials feared Stalin but each needed the other because both feared the masses.  Terror, purging and paranoia thus became permanent and necessary adjuncts of state power in the USSR.
  • 64.  Issac Deutscher, biographer of Trotsky, stated in ‘Stalin: A Political Biography’ that Stalin functioned in a country of social and economic backwardness. Deutscher also characterised terror as ‘rational’, speculating that Stalin launched a pre-emptive strike against Old Bolsheviks, party officials and the army high command to counter the threat of a coup d'état should war break out with Germany.
  • 65.
  • 66.  Deutscher writes in his biography that Stalin was probably thinking of 1917 when he started the Great Terror and show trials. In 1917 government disunity and the army’s political unreliability were major factors in tsarism’s collapse.  By staffing the party-state with inexperienced cadres and officers completely dependent on himself, Stalin may have been attempting to strengthen the regime.
  • 67.
  • 68.
  • 69.
  • 70.  Deutscher writes that although Stalin was boundlessly cruel and probably insane, he played a positive historical role because he was a great ‘moderniser’, dragging the USSR into the twentieth century.  “Russia had been belated in her historical development. In England serfdom had disappeared by the end of the fourteenth century. Stalin’s parents were still serfs.
  • 71.  “By the standards of British history, the fourteenth and twentieth centuries have, in a sense, met …in Stalin. The historian cannot be seriously surprised if he finds in him some traits usually associated with tyrants of earlier centuries.” (Deutscher, Stalin: A Political Biography, 1972)
  • 72.
  • 73.  The Soviet dissident historian, Roy Medvedev, pointed to social and economic factors inherited from the ancien regime (Tsarist Russia) which shaped the politics of the 1930s.  Medvedev lays far greater stress on personality than other Marxist historians: “The first and most important was Stalin’s measureless ambition. This incessant though carefully hidden lust for power appeared in Stalin much earlier than 1937 (the height of the show trials). Even though he had great power, it was not enough – he wanted absolute power and unlimited submission to his will.”
  • 74.  Stalin first took revenge upon Zinoviev and Kamenev, who were accused of conniving in Kirov’s death. Kirov had been murdered on 1st December 1934. They agreed to accept moral and political responsibility for their former minor adherent in return for an assurance that they would receive a light sentence.  On Stalin’s orders Zinoviev and Kamenev were consigned to ten and five years of imprisonment respectively. Stalin’s prisons were not rest homes. In addition over 30,000 deportations of members of social groups regarded as hostile to communism took place; exile was to bleak Siberian locations.
  • 75.  According to official records, 681,692 persons were executed in 1937 – 38. The impact of the Great Terror was deep and wide and was not limited to specific political, administrative, military, cultural, religious and national groups.  Even a harmless old Russian peasant woman muttering dissatisfaction with conditions or her young worker-son complaining about housing standards would be dispatched to the horrors of the gulag.
  • 76.
  • 77.
  • 78.
  • 79.
  • 80.  By 1939 the total number of prisoners in the forced-labour system was 2.9 million. In each camp there were gangs of convicted thieves who were allowed by the authorities to bully the ‘politicals’. The trading of sexual favours was rife.  Many inmates would kill or maim a weaker fellow victim just to rob him of his shoes.  Stalin continued to expand the scope of the terror.
  • 81.  No institution in the Soviet state failed to incur Stalin’s suspicion. Even Red Army generals were executed. Stalin’s aim was to ensure that the armed forces were incapable of promoting policies in any way different from his own, and Marshal Tukhachevski, head of the Red Army, laid himself open to trouble by arguing for a more adventurous military strategy for the USSR.
  • 82.
  • 83.  Stalin’s very success in prosecuting the Great Terror brought about a crisis. The original purpose had been to reconstruct the state so as to secure authority and impose Stalin’s policies. However, in carrying out the purges, the executions and imprisonments, Stalin came close to demolishing the state itself.  The blood-purge of the armed forces disrupted the USSR’s defences in a period of intense international tension.
  • 84.  The arrest of the economic administrators in the people’s commissariats impeded industrial output.  The destruction of cadres in party, trade unions and local government undermined administrative co-ordination.  This extreme destabilization endangered Stalin himself. For if the Soviet state fell apart, Stalin’s career would be at an end.
  • 85.
  • 86.  Stalin had started the carnage of 1937 – 38 because of real hostility to his policies, real threats to his authority, a real underlying menace to the compound of the Soviet order. Yet his reaction was hysterically out of proportion to the menace he faced.  However, Stalin was in his element amidst chaos and violence, and had learned how to create an environment of uncertainty wherein only he could remain a fixed, dominant point of influence.
  • 87.
  • 88.
  • 89.
  • 90.  Stalin believed in the rapid trainability of functionaries and experts, and this gave him equanimity when butchering an entire administrative stratum.  No one coming into frequent contact with him in the late 1930s had a chance to become disloyal: he had them killed before such thoughts could enter their heads. He was unflustered about murder.
  • 91.  By the late 1930s Stalin was identifying himself with the great despots of history. He was fascinated by Genghis Khan, and underlined the following adage attributed to him: ‘The deaths of the vanquished are necessary for the tranquillity of the victors.’  Other rulers who attracted him included the previous tsars, Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great.
  • 92.
  • 93.  Stalin continued to admire Lenin even though Lenin on his death-bed wished to sack him from the General Secretaryship.  Lenin’s ideas on violence, dictatorship, terror, centralism, hierarchy and leadership were integral to Stalin’s thinking.  Lenin had bequeathed to Stalin the system of terror – the Cheka (secret police), the forced- labour camps, the one-party state, the prohibition of free and popular elections, the ban on internal party dissent.
  • 94.
  • 95.  It is hard to imagine Lenin carrying out a terror upon his own party.  Nor was he likely to have insisted on the physical and psychological degradation of those arrested by the political police.  Lenin would have been horrified by the scale and methods of the Great Terror.
  • 96.  The Soviet regime had always been desperately insecure. Except for a brief moment in the October Revolution and perhaps in the Civil War, the Bolsheviks could never be sure of a popular mandate.  The frail peace of the New Economic Policy (NEP) 1921 – 28 was accompanied by a belief that matters were balanced on a knife edge. Anxiety increased once the risky adventures of collectivisation and forced industrialisation commenced.
  • 97.
  • 98.  Foreign powers (Britain, France, Germany, Japan, the United States) remained hostile to the new communist state. The Civil War had not been forgotten.  Émigrés in a dozen European capitals conspired against the regime. Peasants rose against the government. Nationalist sentiment had not been suddenly extinguished.
  • 99.  The state was a central and ubiquitous presence.  It was the formal distributor of goods and the near-monopolistic producer of them, so that even the black market traded in state goods.  All urban citizens worked for the state. There were virtually no other alternative employers.
  • 100.  The state was a tireless regulator of life, issuing and demanding an endless stream of documents and permits without which the simplest operations of daily life were impossible.  As everybody including the leaders admitted, the Soviet bureaucracy, recently greatly expanded under Stalin to cope with its new range of tasks and thus full of inexperienced and unqualified officials, was slow, cumbersome, inefficient, and corrupt.
  • 101.
  • 102.  Law and legal process were held in low regard, and the actions of officialdom were marked by arbitrariness and favouritism.  Citizens felt themselves at the mercy of officials and the regime; they speculated endlessly about the people “up there” and what new surprises they might have in store for the population, but felt powerless to influence them.
  • 103.
  • 104.
  • 105.  1 Communist Party rule  2 Marxist-Leninist ideology  3 Rampant bureaucracy  4 Leader cults  5 State control over production and distribution  6 Social engineering  7 Affirmative action on behalf of workers  8 Stigmatization of “class enemies”
  • 106.  9 Police surveillance  10 State terror  11 Various informal, personalistic arrangements whereby people at every level sought to protect themselves and obtain scarce goods
  • 107.
  • 108.
  • 109.  Collectivisation and the First Five-Year Plan (1929 – 32) marked the start of Stalin’s revolution: the transformation of the Soviet Union into an industrial great power.  The outcome of the First World War resulted in the dominance of the world economy by the United States. By 1918, only two global powers remained, the British Empire and the United States. If the Soviet Union wished to gain independence from the American-dominated world economic system, it had to industrialise quickly within ten years.
  • 110.  With the devastation and geo-political shift of the First World War, the age of European power came to an end. The European powers were no longer the world’s overlord. The empires of Germany, Russia, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottomans had come to an end. France, also, ceased to be a great power of the first rank.  Trotsky warned of a ‘Balkanised Europe' under the domination of the new super-power, the United States, just as the countries of south- eastern Europe had once been under the domination of Britain and France.
  • 111.
  • 112.  Hitler warned in 1928, the ‘threatened global hegemony of the North American continent’ would reduce all the states of Europe to the status of Switzerland or Holland.  The United States was a power unlike any other, a novel kind of ‘super-state’. It was precisely the looming potential after 1918, the future dominance of American capitalist democracy, that was the common factor impelling Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and Imperial Japan to such radical action.  All of them saw themselves as radical insurgents against an oppressive and powerful world order dominated by the United States and the British Empire.
  • 113.
  • 114.  National power in the early twentieth century was measured in the currency of battleships. The rations of geostrategic power were fixed at the Washington Naval Conference in 1922 in the ratio of 10:10:6:3:3. At the head stood Britain and the United States, accorded equal status as the only truly global powers.  Japan was granted third place as a one-ocean power confined to the Pacific. France and Italy were relegated to the east Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Germany and Russia were not even considered as conference participants.
  • 115.  The purpose for Stalin and his First Five-Year Plan (1929 – 32) was rapid economic development using state planning and laying the foundations for socialism by rooting out private enterprise.  The Plan involved massive investment in heavy industry, skimping in the area of consumer goods, and substantial involuntary sacrifice of living standards by the general population to pay for it all.
  • 116.
  • 117.  From the start of the Five-Year plan in 1929, Soviet borders were closed to people and goods from the world market, and the country declared its intention of achieving “economic autarchy.” In the short term, this move had the beneficial effect of cutting the Soviet Union off from the Great Depression.  In the long term, however, it set the stage for a retreat into suspicious, parochial isolation that was reminiscent of Muscovite Russia in the sixteenth century.
  • 118.
  • 119.  Increased suspicion of foreign enemies was matched by a sharp rise in hostility to “class enemies” at home: kulaks (rich peasants), priests, members of the pre-revolutionary nobility, former capitalists. In the Communist view all these groups were natural opponents of the Soviet state.
  • 120.  A cultural revolution took place against members of the pre-revolutionary intelligentsia, known as “bourgeois specialists.”  During the New Economic Policy, Lenin had insisted on the state’s need for the specialists’ expertise, even though recommending that they be supervised closely by Communists.
  • 121.
  • 122.  From spring 1928, groups of engineers were charged with “wrecking” (intentionally damaging the Soviet economy) and treasonous contacts with foreign capitalists and intelligence services.  Stalin announced the urgent need for the Soviet Union to acquire its own “workers’ and peasants’ intelligentsia” to replace the “bourgeois intelligentsia” inherited from the Tsarist regime.
  • 123.
  • 124.  Stalin initiated a major program for sending workers, peasants, and young Communists to higher education, particularly engineering school, so that they could prepare for leadership in the new society.  The beneficiaries of the program achieved rapid promotion during the Great Purges and constituted a long-lasting political elite – the “Brezhnev generation” – whose tenure in power lasted until the 1980s.
  • 125.
  • 126.  Following the Five-Year Plans and the Soviet victory in the Second World War against Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union became part of the established order within the international system.  Marxism-Leninism served to legitimate an established order, an established social and political system, the dictatorship of Stalin and his successors.
  • 127.  Despite the predications of Marx and Engels, the state in the Soviet Union was very far from withering away under Stalin and his successors.  The official Soviet account said that the state did not disappear until the achievement of full communism. Socialism was only a stage in the development towards communism and the state was necessary to protect the gains already made and ensure the continued development towards communism.
  • 128.
  • 129.  Under Stalin, the Communist Party became the supreme force in the Soviet Union. The annual anniversary parades in Red Square to mark the October Revolution personified this.  Attempts to question the ‘leading role’ of the Communist Party brought about the invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 and the introduction of marital law in Poland in 1981.
  • 130.  The first generation of communists, Lenin’s colleagues, were intellectuals of middle-class background who joined the Party when adult.  The second generation, those of the 1930s and 1940s, were more men of peasant background who joined the Party early in life. They had little higher education and specialised in coercive political organisation.  In the post-Stalin period after 1953, the Party came to be dominated by men with a very high degree of technical education, specialists in administration and business management.
  • 131.
  • 132.  Life in Russia, later the Soviet Union, from the First World War and Russian Civil War, was unpredictable. Huge numbers of people were uprooted geographically and socially, losing touch with family and friends, working in occupations different from the ones that had seemed marked out for them.  The October Revolution opened doors for advancement for some people, closed them for others. Stalin’s revolution in the 1930s shattered routines and expectations.
  • 133.  Despite its promises of future abundance and massive propaganda of its current achievements, the Stalinist regime did little to improve the life of its people in the 1930s.  The NKVD’s soundings of public opinion, the Stalinist regime was relatively though not desperately unpopular in Russian towns. In Russian villages its unpopularity was much greater due to collectivisation and famine.
  • 134.
  • 135.  Overall, as the NKVD regularly reported and official statements repeated, the ordinary “little man” in Soviet towns, who thought only of his own and his family’s welfare, was “dissatisfied with Soviet power,” though in a fatalistic and passive manner.  The post-NEP situation was compared unfavourably with NEP, and Stalin – despite the officially fostered Stalin cult – was compared unfavourably with Lenin, sometimes because he was more repressive but more often because he let the people go hungry.