The document discusses how the author's view of Peter Lalor and the diggers at the Eureka Stockade changed after reading the article. Initially, the author viewed the diggers as an unorganized rabble of miners holding the government ransom over mining licenses. However, after reading about Peter Lalor's influential leadership and advocacy for miners' rights, as well as his likening of their situation to the Magna Carta, the author realized Lalor was more than just a miner with a beard. The author began viewing Lalor as more of a heroic figure like William Wallace, preparing troops for battle with rousing speeches. While acknowledging the article provides a one-sided view of history painting Lalor as defending
2. Before reading
this article I
had a vision of the
diggers at the Eureka
Stockade as an
unorganised rabble of
miners who held the
government to
ransom over a miners
licence.
Molony, J. (2001). The
making of a legend. In
Eureka (2nd ed.) (pp. 193-
203 & 229). Carlton,
Vic. : Melbourne
University Press.
4. I would contest that I was a
well-educated man.
Furthermore I was an
influential leader and strong
advocate for the
rights of the diggers.
However after
reading this article I had
a changed point of
view.
I was now
asking myself why did I
not know
about
Peter Lalor ?
5. Peter Lalor was more than just his beard.
This was displayed when he insisted that if the
government wanted to enforce unjust measures by
force of arms, then the people had to respond in the
same manner (Molony, 2001).
Furthermore, Lalor displayed that he was an educated
man when he likened the plight of the miners to that of
King John’s barons, “ …..King John has granted the
Magna Carta to the barons with arms in their hands, and
not in response to a petition of the people.”
(Molony, 2001. P.193) –
6. After reading this article I
began to imagine Lalor more
as a William Wallace type
character from the film
Braveheart, giving his troops
rousing speeches and
preparing them for battle.
Why do my thoughts
escape me?
9. This article does tend to paint a
one sided image of history with
Lalor as the defender the people
verses Governor Hotham the
tyrannical dictator. For a more
balance perception of history one
would have to include other
readings into their research
10. I must admit, it’s a one
sided view of history
that I really enjoy.
Hear! hear!
Freedom
Before reading this article I had a vision of the diggers at the Eureaka Stockade as an unorganised rabble of miners who held the government to ransom over a miners licence.
Unorganized rabble - picture of a shit foot ball team
However reading this article I had a changed point of view. I would contest that Lalor came across as a well-educated, influential leader and strong. – picture of peter lalar.
After reading this article I began to imagine Lalor more as a William Wallace type character from the film Braveheart, giving his troops rousing speeches and preparing them for battle.
This was displayed when he insisted that if the government wanted to enforce unjust measures by force of arms, then people had to respond in the same manner (Molony, 2001). Furthermore Lalor displayed that he was a educated man when he likened the plight of the miners to that of King John’s barons, “ …..King John has granted the Magna Carta to the barons with arms in their hands, and not in response to a petition of the people.” (Molony, 2001. P.193) – picture of magankater
. This article does tend to paint a one sided image of history with Lalor as the defender the people verse Governor Hotham the tyrannical dictator. For a more balance perception of history one would have to include other reading into their research – that’s ok because so am i.
This was displayed when he insisted that if the government wanted to enforce unjust measures by force of arms, then people had to respond in the same manner (Molony, 2001). Furthermore Lalor displayed that he was a educated man when he likened the plight of the miners to that of King John’s barons, “ …..King John has granted the Magna Carta to the barons with arms in their hands, and not in response to a petition of the people.” (Molony, 2001. P.193) – picture of magankater