High
Fidelity
Prototyping
Because JPG Attachments Suck
Thomas Fogarasy - 2014 NOV.
fogarasy.com
fogarasy@brandlift.eu
I. Hi-fi what?
II. What is it for?
III. Tools for mobile prototyping
IV. DEMO
a quick definiton
Hi-fi what?
I.
• feels like a product
• almost final look&feel
• shows some or all features
• minimal or no native code
Hi-fi
• lotoffeatures/screensshown
• fewer details
• broad view of the system
horizontal
• fewer, key features
• PoC focus
• more detailed interactions
vertical
scenarios and benefits
What is it for?
II.
•   IxD validation, testing
•   UI fine-tuning, animation (yay!)
•   user/client testing
•   seeking partners
•   market/crowdfunding demo
(awesome for elevator pitches)
Time-days(estimate)
0
7,5
15
22,5
30
Sketches Wireframes Mockups Hi-Fi Prototypes Native Dev
it’s that cool
(mobile UI perspective)
Tools?
II.
How do they compare?
Pixate
Proto.io
Marvel, Flinto
Starting with your mockup
(.sketch, .psd, .ai…)
Framer.js
Functional Visual
After Effects
InVision
Nothing in
between???
Difficulty
Medium High
Marvel & Pixate
DEMO
III.
UI concept
for prototyping
demonsration
Tools: Marvel & Pixate
conference networking app
DEMO Links
http://marvl.in/7fb7de pixt.io/p256v8tv5o4
Functional Prototype for IA
testing, navigation, user testing
Interaction design prototype for
look & feel demo, concept demo,
user testing
Different build-up
InVision, Flinto… Pixate, Framer…
What we really need
( there’s no such tool yet)
1. Horizontal and Vertical prototypes:
different goal
2. Holy grail not found yet: apps are struggling
between functional and visual focus
3. Keep an eye on Pixate and Framer.js!
Takeaways
Thomas Fogarasy
@thomasfogarasy
fogarasy.com
fogarasy@brandlift.eu
momeid.mome.hu
DESIGNER
UI PSD
Q &A
Thank you!

High Fidelity UI Prototyping - Because JPG Attachments S*ck