This document provides information for authors submitting articles to the International Journal of Project Management. It describes the journal's scope and topics covered, which include concepts, evaluation, team building, risk analysis, scheduling, and more. The submission process and requirements are outlined, including submitting original work that has not been previously published. Ethical guidelines, authorship changes, and copyright are also addressed. The journal is published in collaboration with project management associations and aims to advance both practical and theoretical knowledge in the field.
Knowledge produced in the public sector has been found to be an important ingredient of
economic growth and technological progress. Close links to academic research have further
been shown to be beneficial for innovation performance of the individual firm. As there are
many different channels through which academic science reaches the private sector, most
prominently licensing contracts, joint research and academic consulting, it is important for
the decision making of policy makers and managers to assess their effectiveness. Most of the
existing research has focused on formal university technology transfer mechanisms, i.e. those
that embody or directly lead to a legal instrument like a patent, license or royalty agreement.
Only a few authors have investigated informal university technology transfer mechanisms.
Informal technology transfer focuses on non-contractual interactions of the agents involved,
i.e. on university scientists and industry personnel. Research suggests that formal and
informal technology transfer may go well together in that informal contacts improve the
quality of a formal relationship or that formal contracts are accompanied by an informal
relation of mutual exchange on technology-related aspects.
In this paper, we analyze whether these activities are mutually reinforcing, i.e.
complementary. Our analysis is based on a comprehensive dataset of more than 2,000
German manufacturing firms. We perform direct and indirect tests for the complementarity of
formal and informal technology transfer. Our results confirm a complementary relationship:
using both transfer channels contributes to higher innovation performance. The management
of the firm should therefore strive to maintain close informal relationships with universities to
realize the full potential of formal technology transfer.
Manual serviço c 100 biz - 00 x6b-gce-761 rodadianThiago Huari
Este documento fornece instruções de serviço para a roda dianteira, freio, suspensão e sistema de direção de uma motocicleta C-100 BIZ, incluindo especificações técnicas, valores de torque, ferramentas necessárias e procedimentos de inspeção, remoção, montagem e diagnóstico de defeitos.
The document is a research report submitted by Swapna Shil to Amity Law School for the degree of Master of Laws. It acknowledges the support received from Amity Law School faculty, particularly Dr. Meenu Gupta. The report contains Swapna Shil's statement that the work is original and does not infringe on any copyrights. It also includes a certificate from Dr. Meenu Gupta confirming that the report represents Swapna Shil's independent and original research work. The report is on the topic of "Research Report Writing" and follows standard report formatting guidelines.
Introduction to open access and how you can get involvedIryna Kuchma
This document provides an introduction to open access and how individuals can get involved. It discusses how open access provides benefits to researchers, research institutions, and publishers. It provides practical guidance on copyright and submitting articles to journals. It addresses concerns about plagiarism and open access. Finally, it discusses examples of open access activities in different countries and calls for collaboration to promote open access.
This document provides information for authors submitting articles to the journal Building and Environment, including a description of the journal, its audience and impact factor, editorial board members, guidelines for authors, ethics and processes for submissions. Key points include that the journal focuses on new knowledge related to environmental performance of the built environment, publishes original research and review articles, and aims to advance the state-of-the-art through rigorous and validated work. The intended audience includes civil engineers, environmentalists and designers.
Submission Deadline The full report including Question 1 to 4.docxhanneloremccaffery
Submission Deadline:
The full report including Question 1 to 4 as 1 document not exceeding 2500 words in total should be handed-in electronically through Turnitin by:
Organisational Scenario:
Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing Study
New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) prepared the business case looking at a range of public transport options, including heavy rail. The Transport Agency and Auckland Transport is working together on this part of the project, including any necessary route protection for public transport.
In 2013, the Government announced its support for a tunnel in preference to a bridge, to work in conjunction with the existing Auckland Harbour Bridge. The preferred route for the additional crossing is a tunnel running underground just south of the Onewa Road interchange on the North Shore and reach the isthmus at depth under Westhaven Marina. An additional crossing is likely to cost between $4 billion and $6 billion, and is likely to be needed between 2025 and 2030.
The creation of an additional harbour crossing to carry the bulk of SH1 traffic offers flexibility for the transport system to evolve over time and maximise benefits of infrastructural investment. The existing harbour bridge, for example, could be used to extend the Northern Busway into the CBD.
https://at.govt.nz/about-us/reports-publications/waitemata-harbour-crossing-study/
Assignment Requirements:
As an engineering management consultant you are required to prepare a risk management report about Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing.
The aim is to achieve an understanding of the risk management process, tools and techniques. You are required to follow the risk management process specified in “Risk Management: AS/NZS 4360:2004”.
Figure 1: The risk management process (Adapted from Standards New Zealand, 2004)
Question 1 Project Context:
Critically analyse the project context (from a risk management perspective). Provide a summary of the project context in report format, suitable as a briefing for key stakeholders.
Question 2 Risk Identification:
Identify the risks of the proposed project. Produce an overall summary of risks identified and categorised the risks into main categories, such as technical, external, organisational, and project management. You should identify at least 10 risks.
Question 3 Risk Analysis and Evaluation:
Choose one major identified risk from each category (four risks in total), fully analysis and evaluate each risk using either a qualitative or quantitative analysis method.
Question 4 Risk Treatment:
Examine the best way of treating your chosen four risks from Question 3. Develop and present a fully detailed Risk Treatment Plan, justifying the reasons for your treatment choices.
Data Sources
Under no circumstances should you approach the agencies or any of the parties involved in the project for any reason.
Appropriate Secondary Data Sources
It is suggested that secondary data sources are extensively utilised e.g.
This document provides information about the sixth edition of the textbook "Product Design and Development" by Karl T. Ulrich and Steven D. Eppinger. It includes the copyright information, list of contributors to the book, and acknowledgments. The preface provides an overview of the authors' approach and goals for the textbook, which blends theory and practice through an emphasis on structured product development methods. It is intended to be used both in academic and industrial settings.
Knowledge produced in the public sector has been found to be an important ingredient of
economic growth and technological progress. Close links to academic research have further
been shown to be beneficial for innovation performance of the individual firm. As there are
many different channels through which academic science reaches the private sector, most
prominently licensing contracts, joint research and academic consulting, it is important for
the decision making of policy makers and managers to assess their effectiveness. Most of the
existing research has focused on formal university technology transfer mechanisms, i.e. those
that embody or directly lead to a legal instrument like a patent, license or royalty agreement.
Only a few authors have investigated informal university technology transfer mechanisms.
Informal technology transfer focuses on non-contractual interactions of the agents involved,
i.e. on university scientists and industry personnel. Research suggests that formal and
informal technology transfer may go well together in that informal contacts improve the
quality of a formal relationship or that formal contracts are accompanied by an informal
relation of mutual exchange on technology-related aspects.
In this paper, we analyze whether these activities are mutually reinforcing, i.e.
complementary. Our analysis is based on a comprehensive dataset of more than 2,000
German manufacturing firms. We perform direct and indirect tests for the complementarity of
formal and informal technology transfer. Our results confirm a complementary relationship:
using both transfer channels contributes to higher innovation performance. The management
of the firm should therefore strive to maintain close informal relationships with universities to
realize the full potential of formal technology transfer.
Manual serviço c 100 biz - 00 x6b-gce-761 rodadianThiago Huari
Este documento fornece instruções de serviço para a roda dianteira, freio, suspensão e sistema de direção de uma motocicleta C-100 BIZ, incluindo especificações técnicas, valores de torque, ferramentas necessárias e procedimentos de inspeção, remoção, montagem e diagnóstico de defeitos.
The document is a research report submitted by Swapna Shil to Amity Law School for the degree of Master of Laws. It acknowledges the support received from Amity Law School faculty, particularly Dr. Meenu Gupta. The report contains Swapna Shil's statement that the work is original and does not infringe on any copyrights. It also includes a certificate from Dr. Meenu Gupta confirming that the report represents Swapna Shil's independent and original research work. The report is on the topic of "Research Report Writing" and follows standard report formatting guidelines.
Introduction to open access and how you can get involvedIryna Kuchma
This document provides an introduction to open access and how individuals can get involved. It discusses how open access provides benefits to researchers, research institutions, and publishers. It provides practical guidance on copyright and submitting articles to journals. It addresses concerns about plagiarism and open access. Finally, it discusses examples of open access activities in different countries and calls for collaboration to promote open access.
This document provides information for authors submitting articles to the journal Building and Environment, including a description of the journal, its audience and impact factor, editorial board members, guidelines for authors, ethics and processes for submissions. Key points include that the journal focuses on new knowledge related to environmental performance of the built environment, publishes original research and review articles, and aims to advance the state-of-the-art through rigorous and validated work. The intended audience includes civil engineers, environmentalists and designers.
Submission Deadline The full report including Question 1 to 4.docxhanneloremccaffery
Submission Deadline:
The full report including Question 1 to 4 as 1 document not exceeding 2500 words in total should be handed-in electronically through Turnitin by:
Organisational Scenario:
Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing Study
New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) prepared the business case looking at a range of public transport options, including heavy rail. The Transport Agency and Auckland Transport is working together on this part of the project, including any necessary route protection for public transport.
In 2013, the Government announced its support for a tunnel in preference to a bridge, to work in conjunction with the existing Auckland Harbour Bridge. The preferred route for the additional crossing is a tunnel running underground just south of the Onewa Road interchange on the North Shore and reach the isthmus at depth under Westhaven Marina. An additional crossing is likely to cost between $4 billion and $6 billion, and is likely to be needed between 2025 and 2030.
The creation of an additional harbour crossing to carry the bulk of SH1 traffic offers flexibility for the transport system to evolve over time and maximise benefits of infrastructural investment. The existing harbour bridge, for example, could be used to extend the Northern Busway into the CBD.
https://at.govt.nz/about-us/reports-publications/waitemata-harbour-crossing-study/
Assignment Requirements:
As an engineering management consultant you are required to prepare a risk management report about Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing.
The aim is to achieve an understanding of the risk management process, tools and techniques. You are required to follow the risk management process specified in “Risk Management: AS/NZS 4360:2004”.
Figure 1: The risk management process (Adapted from Standards New Zealand, 2004)
Question 1 Project Context:
Critically analyse the project context (from a risk management perspective). Provide a summary of the project context in report format, suitable as a briefing for key stakeholders.
Question 2 Risk Identification:
Identify the risks of the proposed project. Produce an overall summary of risks identified and categorised the risks into main categories, such as technical, external, organisational, and project management. You should identify at least 10 risks.
Question 3 Risk Analysis and Evaluation:
Choose one major identified risk from each category (four risks in total), fully analysis and evaluate each risk using either a qualitative or quantitative analysis method.
Question 4 Risk Treatment:
Examine the best way of treating your chosen four risks from Question 3. Develop and present a fully detailed Risk Treatment Plan, justifying the reasons for your treatment choices.
Data Sources
Under no circumstances should you approach the agencies or any of the parties involved in the project for any reason.
Appropriate Secondary Data Sources
It is suggested that secondary data sources are extensively utilised e.g.
This document provides information about the sixth edition of the textbook "Product Design and Development" by Karl T. Ulrich and Steven D. Eppinger. It includes the copyright information, list of contributors to the book, and acknowledgments. The preface provides an overview of the authors' approach and goals for the textbook, which blends theory and practice through an emphasis on structured product development methods. It is intended to be used both in academic and industrial settings.
Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-EdisiSreesh P Somarajan
This document provides information about the sixth edition of the textbook "Product Design and Development" by Karl T. Ulrich and Steven D. Eppinger. It includes the copyright information, list of contributors to the book, and acknowledgments. The preface provides an overview of the authors' approach and goals for the textbook, which blends theory and practice through an emphasis on structured product development methods. It is intended to be used both in academic and industrial settings.
This document provides information about the sixth edition of the textbook "Product Design and Development" by Karl T. Ulrich and Steven D. Eppinger. It includes the copyright information, list of contributors to the book, and acknowledgments. The preface provides an overview of the authors' approach and goals for the textbook, which blends theory and practice through an emphasis on structured product development methods. It is intended to be used both in academic and industrial settings.
Thesis Singh Wenzlaff_Leadership in Open Innovation final submittedAakriti Singh
This document summarizes a master's thesis that explores leadership characteristics in open innovation projects between industry and academia. The thesis begins by reviewing literature on open innovation and leadership theories. It then describes the qualitative research methodology, which involved 18 interviews with R&D leaders from industry and academia. The results show that open innovation collaborations vary in nature from contractual relationships to highly interactive partnerships. Leaders play an important role in fostering collaboration, and characteristics like autonomy, communication, and joint problem-solving are important. However, no single leadership theory fully captures leadership in open innovation projects.
1. Statement of Course ObjectivesThe objective of the Directed.docxgasciognecaren
1. Statement of Course Objectives
The objective of the Directed Readings is to provide an organized and systematic study and research arrangement. This arrangement is expected to facilitate completion of course goals, and to add valuable experience for the student's career.
The main focus of the research will be … some introduction, motivation.
In this project, I will analyze … I will also analyze …
At the end of this project, I hope to better understand … I am a … major, and I am interested in a career in … Accordingly, I think acquiring an understanding of these issues would be valuable in the future because …
2. Bibliography
For the study, the student will use various sources including media coverage, prior published research articles and books, case studies, as well as financial data.
Media coverage
The use of business media coverage should help to give a 'current-event' type feel to the research. These media include WSJ, NYT, Forbes among others.
Research articles and books
Case studies
Financial data
The student may use different online resources such as academic journals and industry databases to further the research.
Macroeconomic data
Institutional data
3. Methodology
Depending upon the nature of the proposed topic, the student is expected to … (how you will go about conducting research on the topics you proposed, is it qualitative vs. quantitative, where will you draw your sources of information, how will you structure/draft your reports ….)
4. Evaluation
Evaluation for course grade will be based on the following considerations:
· Importance of identified topics.
· Breadth and depth of review of existing and concurrent studies.
· Analyzing the topics: method, rigor, depth.
· Positioning this research in broader perspective and convey the findings effectively.
Case Study objective and instructions:
Objective:
This assessment relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to evaluate student’s ability to identify the key phases of projects and to successfully manage the projects by using various IT project management tools and techniques.
The following ULOs are assessed in this assessment.
LO1 Demonstrate ability to skillfully manage projects by putting to effective use various IT project management tools and techniques.
LO2 Critically analyze project parameters and identify the key processes from the available project management book of knowledge in practical case scenarios.
INSTRUCTIONS
In this assignment you will use the IT project management knowledge area and the tools used in project initiation and planning to prepare a project charter for the Case Studybelow. Make sure to analyse the project management parameters and identify the actors relevant to the case study and mention the project scope, constraints and assumptions.
For this assessment, you will prepare a project charter based on the business case given below. Your report should be limited to approx. 1.
DEADLINE AUGUST 1, 2018
Special Issue:
‘Workplace innovation: recent research and practice and avenues for the future’
for: International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation
Guest Editors: dr. Peter Oeij, dr. Diana Rus, Prof. Steven Dhondt, Prof. Geert Van Hootegem
Presentation at the Joint Executive Board Meeting of the European Federation of Psychology Students’ Associations (EFPSA), October 28, 2014,Dobra Voda, Serbia
Marking Criteria(The marks for each criterion are to illustrate .docxalfredacavx97
Marking Criteria
(The marks for each criterion are to illustrate where the main effort should be spent and are not meant to be a strict marking scheme)
30% - Application of Frameworks and models
The required frameworks and models introduced in the assignment task should be applied correctly to identify the key issues emerging relevant to the business example selected.
60% - Depth of Strategic Evaluation.
Key strategic factors should be critically evaluated to develop the required depth of analysis of the business example selected. A strong analysis needs to be evidence based rather than appear to be personal opinion so must draw on relevant sources e.g. news & media, industry publications, company web pages and documentation
10% - Clarity of Structure and Presentation
The report is well organised and logically constructed, following the layout indicated in the assignment task. The quality of writing, spell checking, grammar and referencing need to demonstrate accuracy to ensure the reader can focus on the analysis provided
Please remember that an assignment is not meant to DESCRIBE what you have found. Analysis means commenting on your findings and EXPLAINING what the evidence suggests about the company.
General Guidance
Structure
· The introduction should be brief. It is not meant to provide a history of General Electric.
· The Conclusion needs to draw the analysis to a close and comment on the sustainability of General Electric’s strategic position. Remember you do not introduce new findings into the Conclusion.
· If you include Appendices you must refer to them in the relevant section of the report findings.
· References should clearly list all the material that has been referred to in the report and set out using Harvard style.
Models/Content
· Remember to use the models in a ‘dynamic’ way i.e. place relevant examples onto the models. Do not simply copy and paste ‘generic’ examples from the lecture slides.
· Words in the models are included in the word limit. The models lose their value if they are full of text. They should aid understanding not confuse the reader because too much has been stuffed into them.
· Models should be included in the main body of the report. Only place them in the appendices if they are close to a full page.
· You may well refer to points made in earlier parts of the report to show the connections in the analysis. This shows an awareness of the links between themes
· You will struggle to stay within the word limit so focus on the KEY DRIVERS in your analysis
· You will not be able to use all of the examples if you have done the level of reading required so ‘cherry pick’ those that best illustrate the key drivers
· Facts and figures need to be supported with sources clearly referenced.
Presentation
· Be your own independent work and free from plagiarism by ensuring that work that is not your own is clearly referenced
· Use Harvard style citation and referencing using the Drop-in centre published guidelines
· Be .
The document discusses research and development (R&D) funding models, including:
- The concepts of R&D, R&D&i, and how R&D&i is carried out and funded in both the public and private sectors.
- Major sources of R&D funding including Horizon 2020, national R&D plans, and regional government plans.
- The structure of university research and how it is funded through public and private means.
This document provides guidelines for developing case studies about architectural projects. It includes sections on project abstracts, perspectives, analysis, and submission guidelines. The intended purpose is to create a body of knowledge about architecture practice through rigorous case studies. Case studies can be used for education in schools of architecture and continuing education for practitioners. They provide context and lessons about the complexity of projects and decision making in architectural practice.
The document describes the Light.Touch.Matters project, which will develop new smart materials that combine touch sensitivity and luminosity. Product designers and material researchers will collaborate to create thin, flexible materials based on piezoelectric plastics and OLEDs that can be integrated into products. The materials have potential applications in healthcare products to help users feel better and monitor their health. The project involves partners across Europe from design, materials science, and engineering backgrounds. It will use an iterative design-driven methodology to converge conceptual designs with feasible materials technologies.
Research reporting is the oral or written presentation of the findings in such detail and forms as to be readily understood and assessed by the society , economy or particularly by the researchers.
Report writing is common to both academic and managerial situations . In academics ,a research report is prepared for comprehensive and application oriented learning . In businesses or organizations reports used for the basis of decision making .
Open Access, open research data and open scienceIryna Kuchma
This presentation covers open access (OA) and OA theses & dissertations: why you should take action now; impact & metrics; copyright; open research data; open science; and new skills & competencies for librarians. Target audience: PhD students and librarians
The document provides guidelines for a project work that students must complete individually for a B.Com honors course. It outlines requirements such as submitting a typed, bound report and appearing for a viva voce exam. The report must have 4 chapters and follow prescribed formats. Students will be evaluated based on their report and exam performance. Supervisors are responsible for guiding students on selecting topics, collecting data, and writing their reports. A tentative schedule is provided, and examples of potential project topics are listed.
Running head: COMPANY NAME 1
COMPANY NAME
5
Company Description and SWOT analysis
First Name Last Name
Strayer University
BUS 599
Prof. Andrea Banto and Prof. Adrian Allen
January 15, 2019
Due: Week 3, worth 100 points
Length: The assignment should be 3 to 5 pages, excluding title page and reference page
Important:
· Review the description of this assignment in the course guide or Blackboard and use the tips provided along with this template to help you in your writing.
· Use the textbook and review the recommended pages. Note that your textbook has sample plans at the end of each paper. They are great examples of content.
· Review the grading rubric before writing. Know what you are graded for. Always look at the “exemplary” section.
Notes:
· Please remove the text in red throughout the paper and replace with your information.
· Leave the text in black as it is. You are required to have a heading for each of the sections in your paper.
· Use APA format
· The references must be on a separate page at the end of the paper.
Company Description and SWOT analysis
Company Name
· Provide a brief introduction of the NAB company (name)
· Explain the significance of the name of your NAB company.
· Describe the non-alcoholic beverage you will produce and sell.
Mission Statement
· Write the mission statement (use quotation marks)
· Explain the components of the mission statement and the reasoning for their selection.
Trends in the industry
· Describe the trends in the industry. Try to be specific for your chosen category of beverage. Project future growth rate and why do you think this segment has potential (p.88 in text)
· Provide 3 reasons for choosing the specific beverage and explain each.
Strategic position
· Choose one strategic position from the text (page 142-143) and discuss why you believe this would be the best position for your company.
· Explain the approach to be used to implement this position to stand out from similar products.
Distribution
· Provide an overview of the company’s distribution channels
· Explain how the product will reach the end users. Provide the rationale for your selected method.
Risks
· Outline at least 3 types of risks your company is facing (including regulatory risks). Check pages 148-149.
· Discuss each and explain why you think the company is facing these risks and how your company will mitigate each risks.
SWOT Analysis
· Complete the table below (at least 4 in each category). You must use this matrix. Use bullets for each item in the SWOT.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
· Briefly describe the key items in each category under the table.
References
Be sure to cite all your sources. Use APA to format all the references. Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources
Here are exampl.
This document provides guidelines for formatting a final year project report, including:
- The title page should contain the project title, student and supervisor names, and institution logo in the specified font sizes and styles.
- The report should include chapters on introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and conclusion, as well as references and appendices.
- The body text should be 12pt Times New Roman font with 1.5 line spacing. Figures and tables should be numbered by chapter and referred to in the text.
- Direct quotes from other works must be cited properly, and a references section included in the specified formats. Adhering to these guidelines will result in a professionally formatted final year project report.
Can we use altmetrics at the institutional level? A case study analyzing the coverage by research areas of four Spanish universities.
The study analyzed altmetric data from Altmetric.com for papers published in 2014 from four Spanish universities. Altmetric.com covered 36% of papers, with significant differences between universities and research fields. While altmetrics can provide institutional benchmarking, coverage is low overall and concentrated in multidisciplinary journals and fields like science and nature. Factors like DOI use, language, and type of research limit altmetrics' ability to represent all areas equally at the institutional level.
Can we use altmetric at institutional level?Torres Salinas
This paper aims at exploring the coverage of the Altmetric.com database and its potential use in order to show universities’ research profiles in relationship with other databases. Specifically, our objectives are the following:
1. Analyse the coverage of Altmetric.com at the institutional level and verify its validity as a data source for obtaining alternative metrics derived from the research activity of universities in comparison with those from the Web of Science. For this, we will work with a small sample of four Spanish universities.
2. Analyse coverage differences when obtainin bibliometric profiles from Altmetric.com and Web of Science. In some studies a higher coverage of the Social Sciences and Humanities has been reported, suggesting the potential of altmetric indicators in these areas (Costas, Zahedi, & Wouters, 2015b).
Can we use altmetrics at the institutional level? A case study analysing the ...Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
Altmetrics provide useful insights at the institutional level but have some limitations. A study of four Spanish universities found altmetrics covered 36% of documents, with significant differences between universities and fields. Altmetrics are concentrated in multidisciplinary journals and social sciences/humanities have lower coverage. While altmetrics can benchmark universities, their use requires accounting for low coverage overall and in certain areas.
International Conference on Health Information Technology and Primary Healthc...BOSC Tech Labs
This conference is the premier interdisciplinary forum to represent the new advances and research results in Health and Medical Engineering. It was held in San Francisco, United States, on the 3rd and 4th of November, 2022. It is a federated organization that brings together several scholar events for presentation within the conference program. These events are conducted during the conference based on the number and length of presentations. It gives exceptional value to its students, academics, and industry research with high-quality Healthcare development.
This document provides guidance for customers on how to plan and implement an intralogistic system project. It outlines four key steps: 1) preparing the project by defining needs, investment limits, relevant data and physical implementation, 2) preparing the consultation process by determining design freedom and supplier methodology, 3) comparing proposals by evaluating performance, functionality, costs and evolution, and 4) organizing implementation through defining roles, working relationships, safety, and after-sales services. The overall aim is to encourage good practice and ensure successful cooperation between customers and suppliers of intralogistic systems.
Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-EdisiSreesh P Somarajan
This document provides information about the sixth edition of the textbook "Product Design and Development" by Karl T. Ulrich and Steven D. Eppinger. It includes the copyright information, list of contributors to the book, and acknowledgments. The preface provides an overview of the authors' approach and goals for the textbook, which blends theory and practice through an emphasis on structured product development methods. It is intended to be used both in academic and industrial settings.
This document provides information about the sixth edition of the textbook "Product Design and Development" by Karl T. Ulrich and Steven D. Eppinger. It includes the copyright information, list of contributors to the book, and acknowledgments. The preface provides an overview of the authors' approach and goals for the textbook, which blends theory and practice through an emphasis on structured product development methods. It is intended to be used both in academic and industrial settings.
Thesis Singh Wenzlaff_Leadership in Open Innovation final submittedAakriti Singh
This document summarizes a master's thesis that explores leadership characteristics in open innovation projects between industry and academia. The thesis begins by reviewing literature on open innovation and leadership theories. It then describes the qualitative research methodology, which involved 18 interviews with R&D leaders from industry and academia. The results show that open innovation collaborations vary in nature from contractual relationships to highly interactive partnerships. Leaders play an important role in fostering collaboration, and characteristics like autonomy, communication, and joint problem-solving are important. However, no single leadership theory fully captures leadership in open innovation projects.
1. Statement of Course ObjectivesThe objective of the Directed.docxgasciognecaren
1. Statement of Course Objectives
The objective of the Directed Readings is to provide an organized and systematic study and research arrangement. This arrangement is expected to facilitate completion of course goals, and to add valuable experience for the student's career.
The main focus of the research will be … some introduction, motivation.
In this project, I will analyze … I will also analyze …
At the end of this project, I hope to better understand … I am a … major, and I am interested in a career in … Accordingly, I think acquiring an understanding of these issues would be valuable in the future because …
2. Bibliography
For the study, the student will use various sources including media coverage, prior published research articles and books, case studies, as well as financial data.
Media coverage
The use of business media coverage should help to give a 'current-event' type feel to the research. These media include WSJ, NYT, Forbes among others.
Research articles and books
Case studies
Financial data
The student may use different online resources such as academic journals and industry databases to further the research.
Macroeconomic data
Institutional data
3. Methodology
Depending upon the nature of the proposed topic, the student is expected to … (how you will go about conducting research on the topics you proposed, is it qualitative vs. quantitative, where will you draw your sources of information, how will you structure/draft your reports ….)
4. Evaluation
Evaluation for course grade will be based on the following considerations:
· Importance of identified topics.
· Breadth and depth of review of existing and concurrent studies.
· Analyzing the topics: method, rigor, depth.
· Positioning this research in broader perspective and convey the findings effectively.
Case Study objective and instructions:
Objective:
This assessment relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to evaluate student’s ability to identify the key phases of projects and to successfully manage the projects by using various IT project management tools and techniques.
The following ULOs are assessed in this assessment.
LO1 Demonstrate ability to skillfully manage projects by putting to effective use various IT project management tools and techniques.
LO2 Critically analyze project parameters and identify the key processes from the available project management book of knowledge in practical case scenarios.
INSTRUCTIONS
In this assignment you will use the IT project management knowledge area and the tools used in project initiation and planning to prepare a project charter for the Case Studybelow. Make sure to analyse the project management parameters and identify the actors relevant to the case study and mention the project scope, constraints and assumptions.
For this assessment, you will prepare a project charter based on the business case given below. Your report should be limited to approx. 1.
DEADLINE AUGUST 1, 2018
Special Issue:
‘Workplace innovation: recent research and practice and avenues for the future’
for: International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation
Guest Editors: dr. Peter Oeij, dr. Diana Rus, Prof. Steven Dhondt, Prof. Geert Van Hootegem
Presentation at the Joint Executive Board Meeting of the European Federation of Psychology Students’ Associations (EFPSA), October 28, 2014,Dobra Voda, Serbia
Marking Criteria(The marks for each criterion are to illustrate .docxalfredacavx97
Marking Criteria
(The marks for each criterion are to illustrate where the main effort should be spent and are not meant to be a strict marking scheme)
30% - Application of Frameworks and models
The required frameworks and models introduced in the assignment task should be applied correctly to identify the key issues emerging relevant to the business example selected.
60% - Depth of Strategic Evaluation.
Key strategic factors should be critically evaluated to develop the required depth of analysis of the business example selected. A strong analysis needs to be evidence based rather than appear to be personal opinion so must draw on relevant sources e.g. news & media, industry publications, company web pages and documentation
10% - Clarity of Structure and Presentation
The report is well organised and logically constructed, following the layout indicated in the assignment task. The quality of writing, spell checking, grammar and referencing need to demonstrate accuracy to ensure the reader can focus on the analysis provided
Please remember that an assignment is not meant to DESCRIBE what you have found. Analysis means commenting on your findings and EXPLAINING what the evidence suggests about the company.
General Guidance
Structure
· The introduction should be brief. It is not meant to provide a history of General Electric.
· The Conclusion needs to draw the analysis to a close and comment on the sustainability of General Electric’s strategic position. Remember you do not introduce new findings into the Conclusion.
· If you include Appendices you must refer to them in the relevant section of the report findings.
· References should clearly list all the material that has been referred to in the report and set out using Harvard style.
Models/Content
· Remember to use the models in a ‘dynamic’ way i.e. place relevant examples onto the models. Do not simply copy and paste ‘generic’ examples from the lecture slides.
· Words in the models are included in the word limit. The models lose their value if they are full of text. They should aid understanding not confuse the reader because too much has been stuffed into them.
· Models should be included in the main body of the report. Only place them in the appendices if they are close to a full page.
· You may well refer to points made in earlier parts of the report to show the connections in the analysis. This shows an awareness of the links between themes
· You will struggle to stay within the word limit so focus on the KEY DRIVERS in your analysis
· You will not be able to use all of the examples if you have done the level of reading required so ‘cherry pick’ those that best illustrate the key drivers
· Facts and figures need to be supported with sources clearly referenced.
Presentation
· Be your own independent work and free from plagiarism by ensuring that work that is not your own is clearly referenced
· Use Harvard style citation and referencing using the Drop-in centre published guidelines
· Be .
The document discusses research and development (R&D) funding models, including:
- The concepts of R&D, R&D&i, and how R&D&i is carried out and funded in both the public and private sectors.
- Major sources of R&D funding including Horizon 2020, national R&D plans, and regional government plans.
- The structure of university research and how it is funded through public and private means.
This document provides guidelines for developing case studies about architectural projects. It includes sections on project abstracts, perspectives, analysis, and submission guidelines. The intended purpose is to create a body of knowledge about architecture practice through rigorous case studies. Case studies can be used for education in schools of architecture and continuing education for practitioners. They provide context and lessons about the complexity of projects and decision making in architectural practice.
The document describes the Light.Touch.Matters project, which will develop new smart materials that combine touch sensitivity and luminosity. Product designers and material researchers will collaborate to create thin, flexible materials based on piezoelectric plastics and OLEDs that can be integrated into products. The materials have potential applications in healthcare products to help users feel better and monitor their health. The project involves partners across Europe from design, materials science, and engineering backgrounds. It will use an iterative design-driven methodology to converge conceptual designs with feasible materials technologies.
Research reporting is the oral or written presentation of the findings in such detail and forms as to be readily understood and assessed by the society , economy or particularly by the researchers.
Report writing is common to both academic and managerial situations . In academics ,a research report is prepared for comprehensive and application oriented learning . In businesses or organizations reports used for the basis of decision making .
Open Access, open research data and open scienceIryna Kuchma
This presentation covers open access (OA) and OA theses & dissertations: why you should take action now; impact & metrics; copyright; open research data; open science; and new skills & competencies for librarians. Target audience: PhD students and librarians
The document provides guidelines for a project work that students must complete individually for a B.Com honors course. It outlines requirements such as submitting a typed, bound report and appearing for a viva voce exam. The report must have 4 chapters and follow prescribed formats. Students will be evaluated based on their report and exam performance. Supervisors are responsible for guiding students on selecting topics, collecting data, and writing their reports. A tentative schedule is provided, and examples of potential project topics are listed.
Running head: COMPANY NAME 1
COMPANY NAME
5
Company Description and SWOT analysis
First Name Last Name
Strayer University
BUS 599
Prof. Andrea Banto and Prof. Adrian Allen
January 15, 2019
Due: Week 3, worth 100 points
Length: The assignment should be 3 to 5 pages, excluding title page and reference page
Important:
· Review the description of this assignment in the course guide or Blackboard and use the tips provided along with this template to help you in your writing.
· Use the textbook and review the recommended pages. Note that your textbook has sample plans at the end of each paper. They are great examples of content.
· Review the grading rubric before writing. Know what you are graded for. Always look at the “exemplary” section.
Notes:
· Please remove the text in red throughout the paper and replace with your information.
· Leave the text in black as it is. You are required to have a heading for each of the sections in your paper.
· Use APA format
· The references must be on a separate page at the end of the paper.
Company Description and SWOT analysis
Company Name
· Provide a brief introduction of the NAB company (name)
· Explain the significance of the name of your NAB company.
· Describe the non-alcoholic beverage you will produce and sell.
Mission Statement
· Write the mission statement (use quotation marks)
· Explain the components of the mission statement and the reasoning for their selection.
Trends in the industry
· Describe the trends in the industry. Try to be specific for your chosen category of beverage. Project future growth rate and why do you think this segment has potential (p.88 in text)
· Provide 3 reasons for choosing the specific beverage and explain each.
Strategic position
· Choose one strategic position from the text (page 142-143) and discuss why you believe this would be the best position for your company.
· Explain the approach to be used to implement this position to stand out from similar products.
Distribution
· Provide an overview of the company’s distribution channels
· Explain how the product will reach the end users. Provide the rationale for your selected method.
Risks
· Outline at least 3 types of risks your company is facing (including regulatory risks). Check pages 148-149.
· Discuss each and explain why you think the company is facing these risks and how your company will mitigate each risks.
SWOT Analysis
· Complete the table below (at least 4 in each category). You must use this matrix. Use bullets for each item in the SWOT.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
· Briefly describe the key items in each category under the table.
References
Be sure to cite all your sources. Use APA to format all the references. Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources
Here are exampl.
This document provides guidelines for formatting a final year project report, including:
- The title page should contain the project title, student and supervisor names, and institution logo in the specified font sizes and styles.
- The report should include chapters on introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and conclusion, as well as references and appendices.
- The body text should be 12pt Times New Roman font with 1.5 line spacing. Figures and tables should be numbered by chapter and referred to in the text.
- Direct quotes from other works must be cited properly, and a references section included in the specified formats. Adhering to these guidelines will result in a professionally formatted final year project report.
Can we use altmetrics at the institutional level? A case study analyzing the coverage by research areas of four Spanish universities.
The study analyzed altmetric data from Altmetric.com for papers published in 2014 from four Spanish universities. Altmetric.com covered 36% of papers, with significant differences between universities and research fields. While altmetrics can provide institutional benchmarking, coverage is low overall and concentrated in multidisciplinary journals and fields like science and nature. Factors like DOI use, language, and type of research limit altmetrics' ability to represent all areas equally at the institutional level.
Can we use altmetric at institutional level?Torres Salinas
This paper aims at exploring the coverage of the Altmetric.com database and its potential use in order to show universities’ research profiles in relationship with other databases. Specifically, our objectives are the following:
1. Analyse the coverage of Altmetric.com at the institutional level and verify its validity as a data source for obtaining alternative metrics derived from the research activity of universities in comparison with those from the Web of Science. For this, we will work with a small sample of four Spanish universities.
2. Analyse coverage differences when obtainin bibliometric profiles from Altmetric.com and Web of Science. In some studies a higher coverage of the Social Sciences and Humanities has been reported, suggesting the potential of altmetric indicators in these areas (Costas, Zahedi, & Wouters, 2015b).
Can we use altmetrics at the institutional level? A case study analysing the ...Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
Altmetrics provide useful insights at the institutional level but have some limitations. A study of four Spanish universities found altmetrics covered 36% of documents, with significant differences between universities and fields. Altmetrics are concentrated in multidisciplinary journals and social sciences/humanities have lower coverage. While altmetrics can benchmark universities, their use requires accounting for low coverage overall and in certain areas.
International Conference on Health Information Technology and Primary Healthc...BOSC Tech Labs
This conference is the premier interdisciplinary forum to represent the new advances and research results in Health and Medical Engineering. It was held in San Francisco, United States, on the 3rd and 4th of November, 2022. It is a federated organization that brings together several scholar events for presentation within the conference program. These events are conducted during the conference based on the number and length of presentations. It gives exceptional value to its students, academics, and industry research with high-quality Healthcare development.
This document provides guidance for customers on how to plan and implement an intralogistic system project. It outlines four key steps: 1) preparing the project by defining needs, investment limits, relevant data and physical implementation, 2) preparing the consultation process by determining design freedom and supplier methodology, 3) comparing proposals by evaluating performance, functionality, costs and evolution, and 4) organizing implementation through defining roles, working relationships, safety, and after-sales services. The overall aim is to encourage good practice and ensure successful cooperation between customers and suppliers of intralogistic systems.
Similar to Guide for international management (20)
ARENA - Young adults in the workplace (Knight Moves).pdfKnight Moves
Presentations of Bavo Raeymaekers (Project lead youth unemployment at the City of Antwerp), Suzan Martens (Service designer at Knight Moves) and Adriaan De Keersmaeker (Community manager at Talk to C)
during the 'Arena • Young adults in the workplace' conference hosted by Knight Moves.
Architectural and constructions management experience since 2003 including 18 years located in UAE.
Coordinate and oversee all technical activities relating to architectural and construction projects,
including directing the design team, reviewing drafts and computer models, and approving design
changes.
Organize and typically develop, and review building plans, ensuring that a project meets all safety and
environmental standards.
Prepare feasibility studies, construction contracts, and tender documents with specifications and
tender analyses.
Consulting with clients, work on formulating equipment and labor cost estimates, ensuring a project
meets environmental, safety, structural, zoning, and aesthetic standards.
Monitoring the progress of a project to assess whether or not it is in compliance with building plans
and project deadlines.
Attention to detail, exceptional time management, and strong problem-solving and communication
skills are required for this role.
Practical eLearning Makeovers for EveryoneBianca Woods
Welcome to Practical eLearning Makeovers for Everyone. In this presentation, we’ll take a look at a bunch of easy-to-use visual design tips and tricks. And we’ll do this by using them to spruce up some eLearning screens that are in dire need of a new look.
Explore the essential graphic design tools and software that can elevate your creative projects. Discover industry favorites and innovative solutions for stunning design results.
1. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 1
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
Published in collaboration with the Association for Project Management (APM) and the
International Project Management Association (IPMA)
AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.
XXX
.
• Description
• Audience
• Impact Factor
• Abstracting and Indexing
• Editorial Board
• Guide for Authors
p.1
p.2
p.2
p.2
p.2
p.4
ISSN: 0263-7863
DESCRIPTION
.
The International Journal of Project Management offers wide ranging and comprehensive coverage of
all facets of project management. Published eight times per year, it provides a focus for worldwide
expertise in the required techniques, practices and areas of research; presents a forum for its readers
to share common experiences across the full range of industries and technologies in which project
management is used; covers all areas of project management from systems to human aspects;
links theory with practice by publishing case studies and covering the latest important issues.
Application areas include: information systems, strategic planning, research and development,
system design and implementation, engineering and construction projects, finance, leisure projects,
communications, defence, agricultural projects, major re-structuring and new product development.
Papers originate from all over the world and are fully peer-reviewed, on the 'double-blind' system. In
addition, the journal carries conference reports, and book reviews.
Topics Covered Include:
Project concepts; project evaluation; team building and training; communication; project start-up;
risk analysis and allocation; quality assurance; project systems; project planning; project methods;
tools and techniques; resources, cost and time allocation; estimating and tendering; scheduling;
monitoring, updating and control; contracts; contract law; project finance; project management
software; motivation and incentives; resolution of disputes; procurement methods; organization
systems; decision making processes; investment appraisal.
The journal is published in collaboration with the Association for Project Management (APM) and the
International Project Management Association (IPMA) and is their official journal.
Benefits to authors
We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts
on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further
information or help, please visit our support pages: http://support.elsevier.com
3. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 3
S. Q. Wang, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
T. Williams, University of Hull Business School, Hull, England, UK
G.R. Winch, Manchester Business School, Manchester, England, UK
Y. Xue, Peking University, Beijing, China
O. Zwikael, Australian National University, ACT Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
4. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 4
GUIDE FOR AUTHORS
.
Your Paper Your Way
We now differentiate between the requirements for new and revised submissions. You may choose to
submit your manuscript as a single Word or PDF file to be used in the refereeing process. Only when
your paper is at the revision stage, will you be requested to put your paper in to a 'correct format'
for acceptance and provide the items required for the publication of your article.
To find out more, please visit the Preparation section below.
INTRODUCTION
The International Journal of Project Management is devoted to the publication of papers which advance
knowledge on practical and theoretical aspects of project organization. The list of classifications at the
end of this guide indicates the scope of the journal. Papers are selected for publication based on their
relevance, clarity, topicality, the extent to which they advance knowledge, and their contribution to
inspiring further development and research. The journal strives to maintain a balance between papers
derived from research and from practical experience. Authors are encouraged to submit case studies
describing the project environment; criteria and factors for success; responsibilities of participants;
managerial arrangements; human factors; contract forms; planning and control systems; problem
areas encountered and lessons learned.
Introduction
Contact Details
Authors should submit articles to the journal online by following instructions on the home page of
the website at http://ees.elsevier.com/jpma
Submission of a paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under
consideration for publication elsewhere, and that if accepted it will not be published elsewhere in the
same form, in English or any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher.
BEFORE YOU BEGIN
Ethics in publishing
For information on Ethics in publishing and Ethical guidelines for journal publication see
http://www.elsevier.com/publishingethics and http://www.elsevier.com/journal-authors/ethics.
Conflict of interest
All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including
any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations within
three years of beginning the submitted work that could inappropriately influence, or
be perceived to influence, their work. See also http://www.elsevier.com/conflictsofinterest.
Further information and an example of a Conflict of Interest form can be found at:
http://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/286/supporthub/publishing.
Submission declaration and verification
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except
in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis or as an electronic
preprint, see http://www.elsevier.com/sharingpolicy), that it is not under consideration for publication
elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible
authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere
in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written
consent of the copyright-holder. To verify originality, your article may be checked by the originality
detection service CrossCheck http://www.elsevier.com/editors/plagdetect.
Changes to authorship
Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their
manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission. Any
addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should be made only
before the manuscript has been accepted and only if approved by the journal Editor. To request such
a change, the Editor must receive the following from the corresponding author: (a) the reason
for the change in author list and (b) written confirmation (e-mail, letter) from all authors that they
agree with the addition, removal or rearrangement. In the case of addition or removal of authors,
this includes confirmation from the author being added or removed.
5. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 5
Only in exceptional circumstances will the Editor consider the addition, deletion or rearrangement of
authors after the manuscript been accepted. While the Editor considers the request, publication of
the manuscript will be suspended. If the manuscript has already been published in an online issue,
any requests approved by the Editor will result in a corrigendum.
Copyright
Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' (for
more information on this and copyright, see http://www.elsevier.com/copyright). An e-mail will be
sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Journal
Publishing Agreement' form or a link to the online version of this agreement.
Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal
circulation within their institutions. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution
outside the institution and for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations
(please consult http://www.elsevier.com/permissions). If excerpts from other copyrighted works are
included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the
source(s) in the article. Elsevier has preprinted forms for use by authors in these cases: please consult
http://www.elsevier.com/permissions.
For open access articles: Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete an 'Exclusive
License Agreement' (for more information see http://www.elsevier.com/OAauthoragreement).
Permitted third party reuse of open access articles is determined by the author's choice of user license
(see http://www.elsevier.com/openaccesslicenses).
Author rights
As an author you (or your employer or institution) have certain rights to reuse your work. For more
information see http://www.elsevier.com/copyright.
Role of the funding source
You are requested to identify who provided financial support for the conduct of the research and/or
preparation of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in
the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to
submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement then this should
be stated.
Funding body agreements and policies
Elsevier has established a number of agreements with funding bodies which allow authors
to comply with their funder's open access policies. Some authors may also be reimbursed
for associated publication fees. To learn more about existing agreements please visit
http://www.elsevier.com/fundingbodies.
The open access publication fee for this journal is $1800, excluding taxes. Learn more about Elsevier's
pricing policy: http://www.elsevier.com/openaccesspricing.
Green open access
Authors can share their research in a variety of different ways and Elsevier has a number of green
open access options available. We recommend authors see our green open access page for further
information (http://elsevier.com/greenopenaccess). Authors can also self-archive their manuscripts
immediately and enable public access from their institution's repository after an embargo period. This
is the version that has been accepted for publication and which typically includes author-incorporated
changes suggested during submission, peer review and in editor-author communications. Embargo
period: For subscription articles, an appropriate amount of time is needed for journals to deliver value
to subscribing customers before an article becomes freely available to the public. This is the embargo
period and begins from the publication date of the issue your article appears in.
This journal has an embargo period of 36 months.
Language (usage and editing services)
Please write your text in good English (American or British usage is accepted, but not a
mixture of these). Authors who feel their English language manuscript may require editing
to eliminate possible grammatical or spelling errors and to conform to correct scientific
6. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 6
English may wish to use the English Language Editing service available from Elsevier's
WebShop (http://webshop.elsevier.com/languageediting/) or visit our customer support site
(http://support.elsevier.com) for more information.
Submission
Our online submission system guides you stepwise through the process of entering your article
details and uploading your files. The system converts your article files to a single PDF file used in
the peer-review process. Editable files (e.g., Word, LaTeX) are required to typeset your article for
final publication. All correspondence, including notification of the Editor's decision and requests for
revision, is sent by e-mail.
Submission address
Please submit your article via http://ees.elsevier.com/jpma/
Additional Information
All papers submitted for publication will be refereed on the 'double-blind' system by two or more
specialists selected from a panel of referees. This means the author and referees do not know each
other, nor do the referees know other referees. Thus it is important that authors' names should
appear nowhere in the manuscript except on the cover page (which will be separated from the
manuscript) and in references. When referring to their own work, authors should refer to themselves
in the third person. Any papers not adhering to this will be returned.
Manuscripts should be 10,000 words long maximum, inclusive of figures and tables. Count each figure
and table as 300 words. As a guide that is 33 pages of manuscript double spaced, counting each
figure or table as one page. Papers must be typewritten in a font size of 12 or 11 pt, double spaced
with wide margins. Write in clear and concise English, using active rather than passive voice. Authors
may refer to themselves in the first person, except when citing their own work. Spelling should follow
the Oxford English Dictionary. Authors should consult a recent issue of the journal for style if possible.
The Editors reserve the right to adjust style to certain standards of uniformity.
PREPARATION
NEW SUBMISSIONS
Submission to this journal proceeds totally online and you will be guided stepwise through the creation
and uploading of your files. The system automatically converts your files to a single PDF file, which
is used in the peer-review process.
As part of the Your Paper Your Way service, you may choose to submit your manuscript as a single file
to be used in the refereeing process. This can be a PDF file or a Word document, in any format or lay-
out that can be used by referees to evaluate your manuscript. It should contain high enough quality
figures for refereeing. If you prefer to do so, you may still provide all or some of the source files at
the initial submission. Please note that individual figure files larger than 10 MB must be uploaded
separately.
References
There are no strict requirements on reference formatting at submission. References can be in any style
or format as long as the style is consistent. Where applicable, author(s) name(s), journal title/book
title, chapter title/article title, year of publication, volume number/book chapter and the pagination
must be present. Use of DOI is highly encouraged. The reference style used by the journal will be
applied to the accepted article by Elsevier at the proof stage. Note that missing data will be highlighted
at proof stage for the author to correct.
Formatting requirements
There are no strict formatting requirements but all manuscripts must contain the essential elements
needed to convey your manuscript, for example Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials and
Methods, Results, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions.
If your article includes any Videos and/or other Supplementary material, this should be included in
your initial submission for peer review purposes.
Divide the article into clearly defined sections.
Double spacing text
Please ensure the text of your paper is double-spaced this is an essential peer review requirement.
Figures and tables embedded in text
Please ensure the figures and the tables included in the single file are placed next to the relevant text
in the manuscript, rather than at the bottom or the top of the file.
7. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 7
REVISED SUBMISSIONS
Use of word processing software
Regardless of the file format of the original submission, at revision you must provide us with an
editable file of the entire article. Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible. Most formatting
codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. The electronic text should be prepared in
a way very similar to that of conventional manuscripts (see also the Guide to Publishing with Elsevier:
http://www.elsevier.com/guidepublication). See also the section on Electronic artwork.
To avoid unnecessary errors you are strongly advised to use the 'spell-check' and 'grammar-check'
functions of your word processor.
Article structure
Subdivision - numbered sections
Divide your article into clearly defined and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered
1.1 (then 1.1.1, 1.1.2, ...), 1.2, etc. (the abstract is not included in section numbering). Use this
numbering also for internal cross-referencing: do not just refer to 'the text'. Any subsection may be
given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its own separate line.
Introduction
State the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background, avoiding a detailed literature
survey or a summary of the results.
Results
Results should be clear and concise.
Discussion
This should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results
and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published
literature.
Conclusions
The main conclusions of the study may be presented in a short Conclusions section, which may stand
alone or form a subsection of a Discussion or Results and Discussion section.
Essential title page information
• Title. Concise and informative. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid
abbreviations and formulae where possible.
• Author names and affiliations. Please clearly indicate the given name(s) and family name(s)
of each author and check that all names are accurately spelled. Present the authors' affiliation
addresses (where the actual work was done) below the names. Indicate all affiliations with a lower-
case superscript letter immediately after the author's name and in front of the appropriate address.
Provide the full postal address of each affiliation, including the country name and, if available, the
e-mail address of each author.
• Corresponding author. Clearly indicate who will handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing
and publication, also post-publication. Ensure that the e-mail address is given and that contact
details are kept up to date by the corresponding author.
• Present/permanent address. If an author has moved since the work described in the article was
done, or was visiting at the time, a 'Present address' (or 'Permanent address') may be indicated as
a footnote to that author's name. The address at which the author actually did the work must be
retained as the main, affiliation address. Superscript Arabic numerals are used for such footnotes.
Abstract
Please supply an abstract of UP TO 150 words outlining the purpose, scope and conclusions of the
paper, and at least two selected keywords. It is important that the abstract should be very clear and
understandable to those whom English is not their native language. The abstract should explain why
the paper is important to those who may not necessarily be in that particular field.
Graphical abstract
Although a graphical abstract is optional, its use is encouraged as it draws more attention to the online
article. The graphical abstract should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial form
designed to capture the attention of a wide readership. Graphical abstracts should be submitted as a
separate file in the online submission system. Image size: Please provide an image with a minimum
of 531 × 1328 pixels (h × w) or proportionally more. The image should be readable at a size of 5 ×
13 cm using a regular screen resolution of 96 dpi. Preferred file types: TIFF, EPS, PDF or MS Office
files. See http://www.elsevier.com/graphicalabstracts for examples.
8. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 8
Authors can make use of Elsevier's Illustration and Enhancement service to ensure the best
presentation of their images and in accordance with all technical requirements: Illustration Service.
Highlights
Highlights are mandatory for this journal. They consist of a short collection of bullet points that
convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate editable file in the
online submission system. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points
(maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See http://www.elsevier.com/highlights
for examples.
Units
You should use SI units, as defined by the ISO standard or your national authorized SI standard.
Where SI units do not exist, use an internationally accepted unit. If you use any symbol or unit that
may not be generally recognized, please put an explanatory note in the margin the first time it is
used, to help the referees and editors.
Footnotes
Footnotes should be used sparingly. Number them consecutively throughout the article. Many word
processors build footnotes into the text, and this feature may be used. Should this not be the case,
indicate the position of footnotes in the text and present the footnotes themselves separately at the
end of the article.
Electronic artwork
General points
• Make sure you use uniform lettering and sizing of your original artwork.
• Preferred fonts: Arial (or Helvetica), Times New Roman (or Times), Symbol, Courier.
• Number the illustrations according to their sequence in the text.
• Use a logical naming convention for your artwork files.
• Indicate per figure if it is a single, 1.5 or 2-column fitting image.
• For Word submissions only, you may still provide figures and their captions, and tables within a
single file at the revision stage.
• Please note that individual figure files larger than 10 MB must be provided in separate source files.
A detailed guide on electronic artwork is available on our website:
http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions.
You are urged to visit this site; some excerpts from the detailed information are given here.
Formats
Regardless of the application used, when your electronic artwork is finalized, please 'save as' or
convert the images to one of the following formats (note the resolution requirements for line drawings,
halftones, and line/halftone combinations given below):
EPS (or PDF): Vector drawings. Embed the font or save the text as 'graphics'.
TIFF (or JPG): Color or grayscale photographs (halftones): always use a minimum of 300 dpi.
TIFF (or JPG): Bitmapped line drawings: use a minimum of 1000 dpi.
TIFF (or JPG): Combinations bitmapped line/half-tone (color or grayscale): a minimum of 500 dpi
is required.
Please do not:
• Supply files that are optimized for screen use (e.g., GIF, BMP, PICT, WPG); the resolution is too low.
• Supply files that are too low in resolution.
• Submit graphics that are disproportionately large for the content.
Color artwork
Please make sure that artwork files are in an acceptable format (TIFF (or JPEG), EPS (or PDF), or
MS Office files) and with the correct resolution. If, together with your accepted article, you submit
usable color figures then Elsevier will ensure, at no additional charge, that these figures will appear
in color online (e.g., ScienceDirect and other sites) regardless of whether or not these illustrations
are reproduced in color in the printed version. For color reproduction in print, you will receive
information regarding the costs from Elsevier after receipt of your accepted article. Please
indicate your preference for color: in print or online only. For further information on the preparation
of electronic artwork, please see http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions.
Figure captions
Ensure that each illustration has a caption. A caption should comprise a brief title (not on the figure
itself) and a description of the illustration. Keep text in the illustrations themselves to a minimum but
explain all symbols and abbreviations used.
9. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 9
Tables
Please submit tables as editable text and not as images. Tables can be placed either next to the
relevant text in the article, or on separate page(s) at the end. Number tables consecutively in
accordance with their appearance in the text and place any table notes below the table body. Be
sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results
described elsewhere in the article. Please avoid using vertical rules.
References
Reference management software
Most Elsevier journals have a standard template available in key reference
management packages. This covers packages using the Citation Style Language,
such as Mendeley (http://www.mendeley.com/features/reference-manager) and also others
like EndNote (http://www.endnote.com/support/enstyles.asp) and Reference Manager
(http://refman.com/downloads/styles). Using plug-ins to word processing packages which are
available from the above sites, authors only need to select the appropriate journal template when
preparing their article and the list of references and citations to these will be formatted according
to the journal style as described in this Guide. The process of including templates in these packages
is constantly ongoing. If the journal you are looking for does not have a template available yet,
please see the list of sample references and citations provided in this Guide to help you format these
according to the journal style.
If you manage your research with Mendeley Desktop, you can easily install the reference style for
this journal by clicking the link below:
http://open.mendeley.com/use-citation-style/international-journal-of-project-management
When preparing your manuscript, you will then be able to select this style using the Mendeley plug-
ins for Microsoft Word or LibreOffice. For more information about the Citation Style Language, visit
http://citationstyles.org.
Reference formatting
There are no strict requirements on reference formatting at submission. References can be in any style
or format as long as the style is consistent. Where applicable, author(s) name(s), journal title/book
title, chapter title/article title, year of publication, volume number/book chapter and the pagination
must be present. Use of DOI is highly encouraged. The reference style used by the journal will be
applied to the accepted article by Elsevier at the proof stage. Note that missing data will be highlighted
at proof stage for the author to correct. If you do wish to format the references yourself they should
be arranged according to the following examples:
Reference Style
Text: All citations in the text should refer to:
1. Single author: the author's name (without initials, unless there is ambiguity) and the year of
publication;
2. Two authors: both authors' names and the year of publication;
3. Three or more authors: first author's name followed by "et al." and the year of publication.
Citations may be made directly (or parenthetically). Groups of references should be listed first
alphabetically, then chronologically.
Examples: "as demonstrated (Allan, 1996a, 1996b, 1999; Allan and Jones, 1995). Kramer et al.
(2000) have recently shown ...."
List: References should be arranged first alphabetically and then further sorted chronologically if
necessary. More than one reference from the same author(s) in the same year must be identified by
the letters "a", "b", "c", etc., placed after the year of publication.
Examples:
Reference to a journal publication:
Van der Geer, J., Hanraads, J.A.J., Lupton, R.A., 2000. The art of writing a scientific article. Journal
of Scientific Communication, 163, 51–59.
Reference to a book:
Strunk Jr., W., White, E.B., 1979. The Elements of Style, third ed. Macmillan, New York.
Reference to a chapter in an edited book:
Mettam, G.R., Adams, L.B., 1999. How to prepare an electronic version of your article, in: Jones, B.S.,
Smith , R.Z. (Eds.), Introduction to the Electronic Age. E-Publishing Inc., New York, pp. 281–304.
Please ensure that references are complete, i.e. that they include, where relevant, author's name,
article or book title, volume and issue number, publisher and location, date and page reference.
10. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 10
It is important that your paper is set in the context of current research, and you should show that the
work is original. Therefore a significant proportion of the citations (typically at least a third) should
be refereed papers published in the last five years. But please do include citations of seminal papers
from the past, which form the foundations of the subject. Web pages are not refereed publications
and so citations of them should be used sparingly.
Video data
Elsevier accepts video material and animation sequences to support and enhance your scientific
research. Authors who have video or animation files that they wish to submit with their article are
strongly encouraged to include links to these within the body of the article. This can be done in the
same way as a figure or table by referring to the video or animation content and noting in the body
text where it should be placed. All submitted files should be properly labeled so that they directly
relate to the video file's content. In order to ensure that your video or animation material is directly
usable, please provide the files in one of our recommended file formats with a preferred maximum
size of 150 MB. Video and animation files supplied will be published online in the electronic version
of your article in Elsevier Web products, including ScienceDirect: http://www.sciencedirect.com.
Please supply 'stills' with your files: you can choose any frame from the video or animation or
make a separate image. These will be used instead of standard icons and will personalize the
link to your video data. For more detailed instructions please visit our video instruction pages at
http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions. Note: since video and animation cannot be embedded
in the print version of the journal, please provide text for both the electronic and the print version
for the portions of the article that refer to this content.
AudioSlides
The journal encourages authors to create an AudioSlides presentation with their published article.
AudioSlides are brief, webinar-style presentations that are shown next to the online article on
ScienceDirect. This gives authors the opportunity to summarize their research in their own words and
to help readers understand what the paper is about. More information and examples are available at
http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides. Authors of this journal will automatically receive an invitation
e-mail to create an AudioSlides presentation after acceptance of their paper.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material can support and enhance your scientific research. Supplementary files
offer the author additional possibilities to publish supporting applications, high-resolution images,
background datasets, sound clips and more. Please note that such items are published online exactly
as they are submitted; there is no typesetting involved (supplementary data supplied as an Excel
file or as a PowerPoint slide will appear as such online). Please submit the material together with the
article and supply a concise and descriptive caption for each file. If you wish to make any changes to
supplementary data during any stage of the process, then please make sure to provide an updated
file, and do not annotate any corrections on a previous version. Please also make sure to switch
off the 'Track Changes' option in any Microsoft Office files as these will appear in the published
supplementary file(s). For more detailed instructions please visit our artwork instruction pages at
http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions.
Finally, you should be able to answer yes to the following questions:
Have you told readers, at the outset, what they might gain by reading your paper?
Have you made the aim of your work clear?
Have you explained the significance of your contribution?
Have you set your work in the appropriate context with sufficient background, and all relevant
references?
Have you addressed the question of practicality and usefulness?
Have you identified future developments that may result from your work?
Have you structured your paper in a clear and logical fashion?
Submission checklist
The following list will be useful during the final checking of an article prior to sending it to the journal
for review. Please consult this Guide for Authors for further details of any item.
Ensure that the following items are present:
One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:
• E-mail address
• Full postal address
All necessary files have been uploaded, and contain:
11. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 14 Oct 2015 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman 11
• Keywords
• All figure captions
• All tables (including title, description, footnotes)
Further considerations
• Manuscript has been 'spell-checked' and 'grammar-checked'
• All references mentioned in the Reference list are cited in the text, and vice versa
• Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including the
Internet)
Printed version of figures (if applicable) in color or black-and-white
• Indicate clearly whether or not color or black-and-white in print is required.
For any further information please visit our customer support site at http://support.elsevier.com.
Additional Information
Please choose at least two classifications from the following lists, as appropriate. This will assist the
editor in choosing referees, as well as helping with cataloguing.
General
Implementing Strategy through Programmes of Projects; Managing Programmes; Project Portfolio
Management; The Project Office; Managing Projects; Project Success and Strategy; Managing
Integration; Project Management Procedures Project Management Information Systems; e-PM; Audits
and Health Checks.
External
Managing Context - Political, Economic, Social and Technical; Managing Context - Legal; Managing
Context - Environmental.
Implementation
Benefits Management; Requirements Management; Managing Scope - Functionality and Value; Value
Management; Managing Scope - Configuration; Managing Scope - Work; Managing Organisation -
Structure and Responsibilities; Managing Quality; Managing Cost; Earned Value; Managing Time;
Network Analysis and PERT; Theory of Constraints/Critical Chain; Neural Networks; Managing
Resources; Managing Risk; Fuzzy sets; Managing Health and Safety.
Life-cycle
Managing the Process - Life-cycle; Managing Project Start-up; Managing Proposal, Definition
and Feasibility; Managing Design, Planning and Appraisal; Managing Implementation; Managing
Commissioning, Testing and Close-out.
Commercial
Investment Appraisal; Managing Finance.
Contractual
Contract Organization/Forms of Contract; Managing Partnerships and Alliances; PPP/PFI; BOOT/
BOT/DBMF etc; Contract Procurement and Tendering (Clients); Bidding (Contractors); Contract
Administration; Managing Materials, Purchasing and Supply; Managing Claims; Managing
International Projects.
People
Developing Individual Competence; Developing Organizational Maturity and/or Capability; Knowledge
Management; Managing Teams; Managing Individuals - Development, Motivation and Reward;
Leadership; Managing Stakeholders; Managing Conflict and Negotiation; Managing Culture; Gender;
Managing Ethics; Decision Making; AHP.
General Management
Managing Human Resources; Managing Operations; Managing Financial Resources; Managing
Markets; Managing Information Systems; Managing Strategy; Managing Innovation; Managing
Change.
Industry and Sector Specific