Graph Databases can solve problems that your normal database struggle with. These can be hard problems, and not all of them were mentioned as graph problems in your CS classes. Using a Graph Database correctly can save the day, and make you look like a super star among your peers.
Find out what a Graph Database can do for you. You might not have a classic "graph problem," but a Graph Database might still be a good solution for your data. Learn what problems Graph Databases solve, how to use one, and most importantly when to use a Graph Database. All of this with concrete examples using the Neo4j Graph Database.
With this talk, we want to:
* Show you what kinds of data are at the sweet spot of Graph Databases.
* How to structure your database to reap the benefits of graphy data
* Teach you how to know when to use a Graph Database, and the fundaments of how to do so
* Show you real application examples on the Neo4j Graph Database
This presentation introduces the graph model as obvious choice for rich and connected data. Graph Databases are a category of open-source NoSQL datastores which are specialized in storing, handling and querying graph structures efficiently.
Use cases represent the applicability of the graph model across many domains.
Neo4j as the most widely used graph database supports the property graph model, which is explained in detail.
To query a graph database a powerful and expressive but also friendly and easily understandable query language that is tailored for graph patterns is key. Neo4j's Cypher is such a query language developed from the ground up to support expressing challenging use-cases in a comprehensive way.
A series of examples rounds up the presentation to apply the lessons learned.
Neo4j is a powerful and expressive tool for storing, querying and manipulating data. However modeling data as graphs is quite different from modeling data under a relational database. In this talk, Michael Hunger will cover modeling business domains using graphs and show how they can be persisted and queried in Neo4j. We'll contrast this approach with the relational model, and discuss the impact on complexity, flexibility and performance.
Relational databases are perhaps the most commonly used data management systems. In relational databases, data is modeled as a collection of disparate tables. In order to unify the data within these tables, a join operation is used. This operation is expensive as the amount of data grows. For information retrieval operations that do not make use of extensive joins, relational databases are an excellent tool. However, when an excessive amount of joins are required, the relational database model breaks down. In contrast, graph databases maintain one single data structure---a graph. A graph contains a set of vertices (i.e. nodes, dots) and a set of edges (i.e. links, lines). These elements make direct reference to one another, and as such, there is no notion of a join operation. The direct references between graph elements make the joining of data explicit within the structure of the graph. The benefit of this model is that traversing (i.e. moving between the elements of a graph in an intelligent, direct manner) is very efficient and yields a style of problem-solving called the graph traversal pattern. This session will discuss graph databases, the graph traversal programming pattern, and their use in solving real-world problems.
Relational databases power most applications, but new use-cases have requirements that they are not well suited for.
That's why new approaches like graph databases are used to handle join-heavy, highly-connected and realtime aspects of your applications.
This talk compares relational and graph databases, show similarities and important differences.
We do a hands-on, deep-dive into ease of data modeling and structural evolution, massive data import and high performance querying with Neo4j, the most popular graph database.
I demonstrate a useful tool which makes data import from existing relational databases with a non-denormalized ER-model a "one click"-experience.
Which leaves biggest challenge for people coming from a relational background is to adapt some of their existing database experience to new ways of thinking.
This presentation introduces the graph model as obvious choice for rich and connected data. Graph Databases are a category of open-source NoSQL datastores which are specialized in storing, handling and querying graph structures efficiently.
Use cases represent the applicability of the graph model across many domains.
Neo4j as the most widely used graph database supports the property graph model, which is explained in detail.
To query a graph database a powerful and expressive but also friendly and easily understandable query language that is tailored for graph patterns is key. Neo4j's Cypher is such a query language developed from the ground up to support expressing challenging use-cases in a comprehensive way.
A series of examples rounds up the presentation to apply the lessons learned.
Neo4j is a powerful and expressive tool for storing, querying and manipulating data. However modeling data as graphs is quite different from modeling data under a relational database. In this talk, Michael Hunger will cover modeling business domains using graphs and show how they can be persisted and queried in Neo4j. We'll contrast this approach with the relational model, and discuss the impact on complexity, flexibility and performance.
Relational databases are perhaps the most commonly used data management systems. In relational databases, data is modeled as a collection of disparate tables. In order to unify the data within these tables, a join operation is used. This operation is expensive as the amount of data grows. For information retrieval operations that do not make use of extensive joins, relational databases are an excellent tool. However, when an excessive amount of joins are required, the relational database model breaks down. In contrast, graph databases maintain one single data structure---a graph. A graph contains a set of vertices (i.e. nodes, dots) and a set of edges (i.e. links, lines). These elements make direct reference to one another, and as such, there is no notion of a join operation. The direct references between graph elements make the joining of data explicit within the structure of the graph. The benefit of this model is that traversing (i.e. moving between the elements of a graph in an intelligent, direct manner) is very efficient and yields a style of problem-solving called the graph traversal pattern. This session will discuss graph databases, the graph traversal programming pattern, and their use in solving real-world problems.
Relational databases power most applications, but new use-cases have requirements that they are not well suited for.
That's why new approaches like graph databases are used to handle join-heavy, highly-connected and realtime aspects of your applications.
This talk compares relational and graph databases, show similarities and important differences.
We do a hands-on, deep-dive into ease of data modeling and structural evolution, massive data import and high performance querying with Neo4j, the most popular graph database.
I demonstrate a useful tool which makes data import from existing relational databases with a non-denormalized ER-model a "one click"-experience.
Which leaves biggest challenge for people coming from a relational background is to adapt some of their existing database experience to new ways of thinking.
Tree-like data relationships are common, but working with trees in SQL usually requires awkward recursive queries. This talk describes alternative solutions in SQL, including:
- Adjacency List
- Path Enumeration
- Nested Sets
- Closure Table
Code examples will show using these designs in PHP, and offer guidelines for choosing one design over another.
Graph Database is the new paradigm of Big Data.
New insights are discovered in the connected data.
Fabricating Big Data into connected data is the cutting edge technology.
Graph database is the driver for sustainable growth in the Era of Big Data.
Graph Data is already prevailing among the global leading companies.
Graph Database will pass the dawn of standards.
The most widely adopted method will be the Hybrid Database.
Each company needs to prepare for the wave of change.
AgenGraph will support your business with superior capabilities.
For more information, please visit www.bitnine.net
Presentation given at the national PHP conference in Poland, in Kielce, October 2011, dealing with the introduction of graph databases in PHP, taking a practical look at OrientDB.
Carlos Estefan y Alfonso de la Rosa son alumnos de Ingeniería Industrial de la Universidad Panamericana, y han elaborado un resumen de cómo importar archivos de Visio a Flexsim
When it’s time to choose the database technology for your app, the choices can be overwhelming. Should you choose SQL or NoSQL? Open source or proprietary? Self-hosted or hosted? If you’re not already familiar with graph databases, you might be tempted to ignore them as an option. But that could be a
mistake.
In this tools-in-action session, I'll discuss the benefits of graph databases. Then I'll demonstrate how you can quickly and easily get started with a graph database using a hosted version of the open-source graph computing framework Apache TinkerPop. I'll show you how you can use APIs and the Gremlin graph traversal query language to perform CRUD (create, read, update, and delete) operations. I'll even show you how you can use Gremlin to quickly create a simple recommendation engine for your users.
New to graph databases? No problem! Come learn all you need to get started here!
Compelling location-based services require more than simple “what’s near me?” operations. The Open Street Map dataset is a perfect example of a rich geographically-based wiki that can be used for much more than map rendering.
With the newly released Neo4j Spatial, any data can be adapted to complex queries with geographic components like “Select all streets in the Municipality of NYC where at least 2 of my friends are walking right now”.
The talk will demonstrate the important benefits of modeling geodata in a graph, the main components needed to expose data to geo stacks like map servers, and explain how the Open Street Map dataset is modeled in Neo4j. I’ll show how using Neo4j unlocks the full potential of the OSM data far beyond just rendering maps.
There will also be some cool examples of Neo4j Spatial, from Telecomms network planning, Web-based AJAX GIS systems, topology editing and routing to REST and Web Feature Service endpoints, all in a single stack.
This is Location-based Services on steroids!
Django and Neo4j - Domain modeling that kicks assTobias Lindaaker
Presentation about using Neo4j from Django presented at OSCON 2010, Portland OR.
Sample code is available at: https://svn.neo4j.org/components/neo4j.py/trunk/src/examples/python/djangosites/blog/
Tree-like data relationships are common, but working with trees in SQL usually requires awkward recursive queries. This talk describes alternative solutions in SQL, including:
- Adjacency List
- Path Enumeration
- Nested Sets
- Closure Table
Code examples will show using these designs in PHP, and offer guidelines for choosing one design over another.
Graph Database is the new paradigm of Big Data.
New insights are discovered in the connected data.
Fabricating Big Data into connected data is the cutting edge technology.
Graph database is the driver for sustainable growth in the Era of Big Data.
Graph Data is already prevailing among the global leading companies.
Graph Database will pass the dawn of standards.
The most widely adopted method will be the Hybrid Database.
Each company needs to prepare for the wave of change.
AgenGraph will support your business with superior capabilities.
For more information, please visit www.bitnine.net
Presentation given at the national PHP conference in Poland, in Kielce, October 2011, dealing with the introduction of graph databases in PHP, taking a practical look at OrientDB.
Carlos Estefan y Alfonso de la Rosa son alumnos de Ingeniería Industrial de la Universidad Panamericana, y han elaborado un resumen de cómo importar archivos de Visio a Flexsim
When it’s time to choose the database technology for your app, the choices can be overwhelming. Should you choose SQL or NoSQL? Open source or proprietary? Self-hosted or hosted? If you’re not already familiar with graph databases, you might be tempted to ignore them as an option. But that could be a
mistake.
In this tools-in-action session, I'll discuss the benefits of graph databases. Then I'll demonstrate how you can quickly and easily get started with a graph database using a hosted version of the open-source graph computing framework Apache TinkerPop. I'll show you how you can use APIs and the Gremlin graph traversal query language to perform CRUD (create, read, update, and delete) operations. I'll even show you how you can use Gremlin to quickly create a simple recommendation engine for your users.
New to graph databases? No problem! Come learn all you need to get started here!
Compelling location-based services require more than simple “what’s near me?” operations. The Open Street Map dataset is a perfect example of a rich geographically-based wiki that can be used for much more than map rendering.
With the newly released Neo4j Spatial, any data can be adapted to complex queries with geographic components like “Select all streets in the Municipality of NYC where at least 2 of my friends are walking right now”.
The talk will demonstrate the important benefits of modeling geodata in a graph, the main components needed to expose data to geo stacks like map servers, and explain how the Open Street Map dataset is modeled in Neo4j. I’ll show how using Neo4j unlocks the full potential of the OSM data far beyond just rendering maps.
There will also be some cool examples of Neo4j Spatial, from Telecomms network planning, Web-based AJAX GIS systems, topology editing and routing to REST and Web Feature Service endpoints, all in a single stack.
This is Location-based Services on steroids!
Django and Neo4j - Domain modeling that kicks assTobias Lindaaker
Presentation about using Neo4j from Django presented at OSCON 2010, Portland OR.
Sample code is available at: https://svn.neo4j.org/components/neo4j.py/trunk/src/examples/python/djangosites/blog/
Graph Databases can solve problems that your normal database struggle with. These can be hard problems, and not all of them were mentioned as graph problems in your CS classes. Using a Graph Database correctly can save the day, and make you look like a super star among your peers.\n\nFind out what a Graph Database can do for you. You might not have a classic "graph problem," but a Graph Database might still be a good solution for your data. Learn what problems Graph Databases solve, how to use one, and most importantly when to use a Graph Database. All of this with concrete examples using the Neo4j Graph Database.\n\nWith this talk, we want to:\n* Show you what kinds of data are at the sweet spot of Graph Databases.\n* How to structure your database to reap the benefits of graphy data\n* Teach you how to know when to use a Graph Database, and the fundaments of how to do so\n* Show you real application examples on the Neo4j Graph Database\n
\n
\n
We are assuming that you are pretty much like us. We want to build things, useful, cool things. Sure theoretical discussions are fun, but at the end of the day, I want things that work, and things that make my users go “wow”. \n
Database performance is like air. You don’t miss it until it’s not there. We don’t want to have to think about the performance. \n
This is another we don’t want to have to think about is if our data is safe. We just assume it is. If the database tells us it’s saved the data, we should trust it.\n
\n
\n
Relational databases are very useful, in some contexts. The pain comes when we try to shoe horn in our data. We loose semantics, and we have to do a lot of extra work to make it work.\n
Databases introduce accidental complexity, i.e. not complexity that has to do with the domain complexity. I want a database that gets out of my way. \n
First you whiteboard a sketch of how you want your data. Then you create a ER-diagram, which is then mapped to a physical model. And let’s not forget our normal forms - I’m sure everyone here makes sure that their database schema is at least in Boyce-Codd Normal Form, right? This is by no means an intuitive process - it takes time to learn. I remember clearly the first few times I had to do this.\n
When we shoehorn our data into a mold it doesn’t really fit in, we also loose performance. The key factor here is that as data size grows, query time grows. And modern systems today create a lot of data.\n
\n
So what are the alternatives? \n
So what are the alternatives? \n
So what are the alternatives? \n
So what are the alternatives? \n
So what are the alternatives? \n
So what are the alternatives? \n
So what are the alternatives? \n
Use the right shape of database for the right kind of object\n
When it comes to size, most databases scale just fine for most of the use cases. The second question is how much complexity your database can handle for you. You can do any complex procedure on any database, so the question is: how much can you unload on your database, and how fast does it do it.\n
When it comes to size, most databases scale just fine for most of the use cases. The second question is how much complexity your database can handle for you. You can do any complex procedure on any database, so the question is: how much can you unload on your database, and how fast does it do it.\n
When it comes to size, most databases scale just fine for most of the use cases. The second question is how much complexity your database can handle for you. You can do any complex procedure on any database, so the question is: how much can you unload on your database, and how fast does it do it.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
nodes\nrelationships between nodes\nrelationships have types and directions\nrelationships are traversed equally fast in each direction, direction may be significant or not\nnodes have properties\nrelationships have properties\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
Querying a graph is done by traversing it.\nTraversing the graph means moving through it to find and gather results\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
A path is one or more nodes with relationships between them,\nthe number of relationships in a path is always one less than the number of nodes, i.e. zero or more\nA node may occur multiple times in a path, but the path defines a sequence by the interconnecting relationships\n
Contrary to many other non relational databases, Neo4j has full ACID transactions.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
A transaction is either committed in its entirety, or not at all, never partial.\nNeo4j guarantees the integrity of relationships. The two nodes must exist.\nYou cannot access the state of an uncommitted transaction from outside of that transaction.\nNeo4j guarantees that when a transaction is committed it has been written to disk.\n
\n
\n
TO DECIDE: include or not?\n
\n
[AT]\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Schema evolution is only in the application layer. Making sense of the data is your applications responsibility, not the databases.\n
[AT]\nIf the data you store is hierarchical, chances are that a graph database is a good solution for you. \n
Has anyone in this room tried to store tree structures in a relational database? Hands up. I’ve done it a number of times - a content management system we built all the way back in 1997, and as late as last year, for an online mobile shopping site. Here are some ways you can do it.\n
The good old adjacency list. Simple, intuitive, and fast for writing. Reading from it is not quite as easy. This is probably the most used way of doing it, and offers no support for a lot of quite common queries you want to do.\n
Nested sets are the brain child of Joe Celko I believe, and a clever way of representing tree structures. The only problem is that adding to a tree, or moving branches of the tree requires roughly half the tree to move to the left or to the right.\n
I have actually never personally encountered this “in the wild”. But it’s an interesting way of solving the problem: just build up strings that show the path from the root to every single node in the tree. \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
[AT]\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
1000 persons = 50’000 relationships\n
1000 persons = 50’000 relationships\n
1000 persons = 50’000 relationships\n
1000 persons = 50’000 relationships\n
1000 persons = 50’000 relationships\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
20 million nodes\n64 million relationships between these nodes\nA* routing in this dataset - avg answer after 100 ms.\nOur worst response took three seconds, and the answer contained 5500 road segments.\n
20 million nodes\n64 million relationships between these nodes\nA* routing in this dataset - avg answer after 100 ms.\nOur worst response took three seconds, and the answer contained 5500 road segments.\n
20 million nodes\n64 million relationships between these nodes\nA* routing in this dataset - avg answer after 100 ms.\nOur worst response took three seconds, and the answer contained 5500 road segments.\n
20 million nodes\n64 million relationships between these nodes\nA* routing in this dataset - avg answer after 100 ms.\nOur worst response took three seconds, and the answer contained 5500 road segments.\n
20 million nodes\n64 million relationships between these nodes\nA* routing in this dataset - avg answer after 100 ms.\nOur worst response took three seconds, and the answer contained 5500 road segments.\n