Albia Dugger • Miami Dade College
Chapter 4
Drugs and the Law
Drugs and the Law
• Attempts have been made to regulate the use of mind-altering
substances since settlers first arrived in the New World
• The first substance regulated was alcohol
• The temperance movement in the late 1700s advocated that
people become more educated about the hazards of alcohol
Early Drug Regulations
• Alcohol
• 1791: Congress passed an excise tax on whiskey
• Opium
• 1833: US treaty regulated international opium trade
• 1842: Tax on crude opium shipped to the US
• 1875: San Francisco prohibiting smoking in opium dens
• 1890: Only US citizens could manufacture or import opium
• Proprietary drugs (over-the-counter drugs)
• Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906
Questions about Drug Laws
• Do drug laws affect whether people use drugs?
• Should drug laws be aimed at drug users, sellers, or
traffickers?
• Should the role of government be to inform its citizens about
drugs or to prevent its citizens from using drugs?
• Should a person be prevented from engaging in self-
destructive behavior?
Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906
• Before 1906, patent medicines were largely unregulated
• US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was created to
assess drug hazards and prohibit sale of dangerous drugs
• Law required drug manufacturers to report adverse reactions
to their products
• Law required that the amount or proportion of drugs in the
medicine had to be listed on the label
Collier’s Magazine, 1905
Harrison Act of 1914
• The Harrison Act resulted from the need to limit opiate use
• Law governed the marketing and sale of narcotics, regulated
nonmedical narcotic use, and made possession of narcotics
without a prescription illegal
• Doctors and pharmacists had to keep records of the
prescriptions they wrote
• To obtain drugs, an increasing number of people resorted to
criminal activity
Marijuana Tax Act of 1937
• Forbade the recreational use of marijuana, but not medicinal
or industrial uses
• Anyone using marijuana was required to pay a tax – failure to
comply meant a large fine or prison term for tax evasion
• AMA and others opposed marijuana legislation
• The Federal Bureau of Narcotics, established in 1932, later
became the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
Arguments against Marijuana
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938
• Under 1906 guidelines, a drug manufacturer could not be
prosecuted for fatalities due to toxic drugs
• 1938 Act required pharmaceutical companies to file
applications with the federal government demonstrating that
all new drugs were safe and properly labeled
• Manufacturers had to submit a “new drug application” to the
FDA, giving the FDA more authority and responsibility
Limitations of the 1938 Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act
• Did not cover drugs that were previously marketed
• Drugs had to be proven safe, but not effective
• Government had little authority to enact penalties
• Manufacturers determined whether a drug would be sold as a
prescription or over-the-counter
• Manufacturers conducted their own tests to determine a
drug’s effectiveness
Kefauver-Harris Amendments
• Serious birth defects caused by thalidomide resulted in
implementation of stronger regulations regarding drug testing
• Kefauver-Harris Amendments, 1962, gave the FDA the
authority to withdraw drugs from the marketplace
• Drug advertisements directed to physicians were required to
include the drug’s side effects and its contraindicated uses
• Testing procedures required prior approval from the FDA
Effects of Thalidomide
Kefauver-Harris Amendments
• 1972 Drug Efficacy Study: The FDA asked the National
Research Council to conduct a study of new drugs
• Active ingredients were placed in one of three categories:
• Category I drugs: Determined to be safe, effective, and
properly labeled
• Category II drugs: Not generally recognized as safe and
effective, or recognized as mislabeled; must be removed
from medications within six months
• Category III drugs: Data insufficient to determine general
recognition of safety and effectiveness
Comprehensive Drug Abuse
Prevention and Control Act of 1970
• Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act
(Controlled Substances Act), effectively replaced all previous
laws dealing with narcotics and dangerous drugs
• Expanded community health centers and Public Health
Service hospitals for drug abusers
• Established a commission on marijuana and drug abuse
• Divided drugs into five categories called schedules
Drug Schedules
Anti–Drug Abuse Act of 1988
• Legislation that emphasizes stringent punishment of the drug
user, to reduce drug demand
• Punishment could be waived if the user completes a drug
rehabilitation program
• Greatly increased federal prison population and led to a new
Cabinet position, Director of National Drug Control Policy
• Under this law, drug users are punished more stringently than
rapists or robbers
College Students and Drug Convictions
• Students convicted of possession face a temporary ban on
financial aid – a third conviction loses financial aid indefinitely
• A drug-selling conviction means loss of eligibility for two years
if that is one’s first offense
• An estimated 200,000 students have lost access to aid since
this law went into effect
Legal Issues
• Should the sale of drug paraphernalia be illegal?
• Should people using small amounts of illegal drugs for
personal enjoyment receive harsh criminal penalties?
• What are the advantages and disadvantages of
decriminalizing or legalizing drugs?
• What impact has drug enforcement had on drug use?
• Should the vast amount of money spent on stopping drugs be
used differently?
Drug Paraphernalia
• Drug paraphernalia:
• Items that are aids to using drugs (cigarette-rolling papers,
water pipes, razors, clay pipes, roach clips, spoons,
mirrors, and other products)
• Prosecuting individuals for possessing drug paraphernalia is
viewed as a deterrent for drug use
The War on Drugs
• In 1988, Congress proclaimed that the US would be drug-free
by 1995
• The monetary expense and human resources employed to
combat illicit drug use are enormous – yet, the number of
Americans who have used illegal drugs has increased
• The government’s assault on illicit drugs has resulted in social
tension, ill health, violent crime, compromised civil liberties,
and international conflict
Federal Prisoners and Drug Offenses
Arguments Against Legalization
• Some argue that decriminalization would increase drug use,
addiction, and drug-related deaths
• Drug-related crimes might fall, but the number of addicts
would rise
• Legalization would result in more dysfunctional addicts who
would be unable to support their lifestyles and drug use
through legitimate means
Arguments For Legalization
• Legal regulation of drugs would protect drug takers and save
money
• Billions of dollars spent on drug enforcement might be put to
use more effectively if the money were directed toward
education and treatment programs
AIDS Cases by Transmission Category
AIDS in the United States by Age
People Living with AIDS
Arguments For and Against Decriminalization
Drug Enforcement
• Drug enforcement is designed to stem the flow of drugs
coming into the US and to punish the user
• To stop drugs at their source, the State Department works
with a number of foreign governments
• DEA agents help block drugs from leaving other countries,
eradicate crops, and find and dismantle illegal laboratories
Methamphetamine Traffic
Drug-Related Arrests
Problems with Enforcement
• Farmers make more money from coca or opium crops than
from legal crops
• On a global scale, less than 10% of illegal crops are
consistently eradicated
• Interdiction is especially difficult because of numerous points
of entry
Cocaine Transportation
Confiscated Cocaine
DEA Drug Seizures
DEA Seize Hashish in Afghanistan
DEA Seize Hashish in Afghanistan
Prevention
• Harm reduction
• Interventions that respond to needs of drug users and the
community to reduce harm caused by illicit drug use
• Includes providing sterile syringes to reduce spread of HIV
infection, education, and increased treatment
• Treats drug abuse as a public health problem, not a
criminal problem
Prevention
• Normalization
• Term used by the Dutch for the practice of not prosecuting
users of soft drugs such as marijuana
• Using some drugs is not illegal, but drug traffic is illegal
• Treatment assists physical and social well-being of addicts
rather than try to stop their addiction
• Result: Netherlands has less drug use than the US and
other European countries
Racism and Drug Enforcement
• Questionable search warrants in inner-city communities
• People of color are stopped and searched more often than
others on the basis of “drug courier” profiles
• Despite comparable drug usage, Blacks are incarcerated at a
higher rate than Whites
• Penalties for crack cocaine, used more by poor, are greater
than those for powder cocaine, used more by middle class
“Drug Courier” Profiles
Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentencing
• Starting in 1984, Congress enacted mandatory minimum
penalties specifically focusing on drugs and violent crimes
• It has been shown that mandatory minimum drug sentences
have not acted as deterrents to further crime
• Mandatory minimum drug sentences give no latitude to
judges to determine appropriate punishments
• Treatment is 15 times more effective for reducing serious
crime than mandatory minimum sentencing

Goldberg Chapter 4 Drugs & the Law

  • 1.
    Albia Dugger •Miami Dade College Chapter 4 Drugs and the Law
  • 2.
    Drugs and theLaw • Attempts have been made to regulate the use of mind-altering substances since settlers first arrived in the New World • The first substance regulated was alcohol • The temperance movement in the late 1700s advocated that people become more educated about the hazards of alcohol
  • 3.
    Early Drug Regulations •Alcohol • 1791: Congress passed an excise tax on whiskey • Opium • 1833: US treaty regulated international opium trade • 1842: Tax on crude opium shipped to the US • 1875: San Francisco prohibiting smoking in opium dens • 1890: Only US citizens could manufacture or import opium • Proprietary drugs (over-the-counter drugs) • Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906
  • 4.
    Questions about DrugLaws • Do drug laws affect whether people use drugs? • Should drug laws be aimed at drug users, sellers, or traffickers? • Should the role of government be to inform its citizens about drugs or to prevent its citizens from using drugs? • Should a person be prevented from engaging in self- destructive behavior?
  • 5.
    Pure Food andDrug Act of 1906 • Before 1906, patent medicines were largely unregulated • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was created to assess drug hazards and prohibit sale of dangerous drugs • Law required drug manufacturers to report adverse reactions to their products • Law required that the amount or proportion of drugs in the medicine had to be listed on the label
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Harrison Act of1914 • The Harrison Act resulted from the need to limit opiate use • Law governed the marketing and sale of narcotics, regulated nonmedical narcotic use, and made possession of narcotics without a prescription illegal • Doctors and pharmacists had to keep records of the prescriptions they wrote • To obtain drugs, an increasing number of people resorted to criminal activity
  • 8.
    Marijuana Tax Actof 1937 • Forbade the recreational use of marijuana, but not medicinal or industrial uses • Anyone using marijuana was required to pay a tax – failure to comply meant a large fine or prison term for tax evasion • AMA and others opposed marijuana legislation • The Federal Bureau of Narcotics, established in 1932, later became the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Food, Drug, andCosmetic Act of 1938 • Under 1906 guidelines, a drug manufacturer could not be prosecuted for fatalities due to toxic drugs • 1938 Act required pharmaceutical companies to file applications with the federal government demonstrating that all new drugs were safe and properly labeled • Manufacturers had to submit a “new drug application” to the FDA, giving the FDA more authority and responsibility
  • 11.
    Limitations of the1938 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act • Did not cover drugs that were previously marketed • Drugs had to be proven safe, but not effective • Government had little authority to enact penalties • Manufacturers determined whether a drug would be sold as a prescription or over-the-counter • Manufacturers conducted their own tests to determine a drug’s effectiveness
  • 12.
    Kefauver-Harris Amendments • Seriousbirth defects caused by thalidomide resulted in implementation of stronger regulations regarding drug testing • Kefauver-Harris Amendments, 1962, gave the FDA the authority to withdraw drugs from the marketplace • Drug advertisements directed to physicians were required to include the drug’s side effects and its contraindicated uses • Testing procedures required prior approval from the FDA
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Kefauver-Harris Amendments • 1972Drug Efficacy Study: The FDA asked the National Research Council to conduct a study of new drugs • Active ingredients were placed in one of three categories: • Category I drugs: Determined to be safe, effective, and properly labeled • Category II drugs: Not generally recognized as safe and effective, or recognized as mislabeled; must be removed from medications within six months • Category III drugs: Data insufficient to determine general recognition of safety and effectiveness
  • 15.
    Comprehensive Drug Abuse Preventionand Control Act of 1970 • Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act (Controlled Substances Act), effectively replaced all previous laws dealing with narcotics and dangerous drugs • Expanded community health centers and Public Health Service hospitals for drug abusers • Established a commission on marijuana and drug abuse • Divided drugs into five categories called schedules
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Anti–Drug Abuse Actof 1988 • Legislation that emphasizes stringent punishment of the drug user, to reduce drug demand • Punishment could be waived if the user completes a drug rehabilitation program • Greatly increased federal prison population and led to a new Cabinet position, Director of National Drug Control Policy • Under this law, drug users are punished more stringently than rapists or robbers
  • 18.
    College Students andDrug Convictions • Students convicted of possession face a temporary ban on financial aid – a third conviction loses financial aid indefinitely • A drug-selling conviction means loss of eligibility for two years if that is one’s first offense • An estimated 200,000 students have lost access to aid since this law went into effect
  • 19.
    Legal Issues • Shouldthe sale of drug paraphernalia be illegal? • Should people using small amounts of illegal drugs for personal enjoyment receive harsh criminal penalties? • What are the advantages and disadvantages of decriminalizing or legalizing drugs? • What impact has drug enforcement had on drug use? • Should the vast amount of money spent on stopping drugs be used differently?
  • 20.
    Drug Paraphernalia • Drugparaphernalia: • Items that are aids to using drugs (cigarette-rolling papers, water pipes, razors, clay pipes, roach clips, spoons, mirrors, and other products) • Prosecuting individuals for possessing drug paraphernalia is viewed as a deterrent for drug use
  • 21.
    The War onDrugs • In 1988, Congress proclaimed that the US would be drug-free by 1995 • The monetary expense and human resources employed to combat illicit drug use are enormous – yet, the number of Americans who have used illegal drugs has increased • The government’s assault on illicit drugs has resulted in social tension, ill health, violent crime, compromised civil liberties, and international conflict
  • 22.
    Federal Prisoners andDrug Offenses
  • 23.
    Arguments Against Legalization •Some argue that decriminalization would increase drug use, addiction, and drug-related deaths • Drug-related crimes might fall, but the number of addicts would rise • Legalization would result in more dysfunctional addicts who would be unable to support their lifestyles and drug use through legitimate means
  • 24.
    Arguments For Legalization •Legal regulation of drugs would protect drug takers and save money • Billions of dollars spent on drug enforcement might be put to use more effectively if the money were directed toward education and treatment programs
  • 25.
    AIDS Cases byTransmission Category
  • 26.
    AIDS in theUnited States by Age
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Arguments For andAgainst Decriminalization
  • 29.
    Drug Enforcement • Drugenforcement is designed to stem the flow of drugs coming into the US and to punish the user • To stop drugs at their source, the State Department works with a number of foreign governments • DEA agents help block drugs from leaving other countries, eradicate crops, and find and dismantle illegal laboratories
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
    Problems with Enforcement •Farmers make more money from coca or opium crops than from legal crops • On a global scale, less than 10% of illegal crops are consistently eradicated • Interdiction is especially difficult because of numerous points of entry
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
    DEA Seize Hashishin Afghanistan
  • 37.
    DEA Seize Hashishin Afghanistan
  • 38.
    Prevention • Harm reduction •Interventions that respond to needs of drug users and the community to reduce harm caused by illicit drug use • Includes providing sterile syringes to reduce spread of HIV infection, education, and increased treatment • Treats drug abuse as a public health problem, not a criminal problem
  • 39.
    Prevention • Normalization • Termused by the Dutch for the practice of not prosecuting users of soft drugs such as marijuana • Using some drugs is not illegal, but drug traffic is illegal • Treatment assists physical and social well-being of addicts rather than try to stop their addiction • Result: Netherlands has less drug use than the US and other European countries
  • 40.
    Racism and DrugEnforcement • Questionable search warrants in inner-city communities • People of color are stopped and searched more often than others on the basis of “drug courier” profiles • Despite comparable drug usage, Blacks are incarcerated at a higher rate than Whites • Penalties for crack cocaine, used more by poor, are greater than those for powder cocaine, used more by middle class
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Mandatory Minimum DrugSentencing • Starting in 1984, Congress enacted mandatory minimum penalties specifically focusing on drugs and violent crimes • It has been shown that mandatory minimum drug sentences have not acted as deterrents to further crime • Mandatory minimum drug sentences give no latitude to judges to determine appropriate punishments • Treatment is 15 times more effective for reducing serious crime than mandatory minimum sentencing

Editor's Notes

  • #7 Magazine articles, such as this one in Collier’s (June 3, 1905), were influential in the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906.
  • #10 The 1930s movie Reefer Madness distorted the effects caused by marijuana.
  • #14 As a result of thalidomide’s effects on the fetus, the United States strengthened its laws regarding the regulation of medicinal drugs.
  • #31 The DEA intercepted this shipment of four pounds of high-purity methamphetamine concealed inside a children’s toy, which was being transported from California to Colorado for distribution in the Greeley area.
  • #34 Figure 4.1 Cocaine Transportation
  • #35 A record 42,845 pounds of cocaine—worth an estimated $300 million in drug revenues—bound for Mexican drug traffickers was seized by the U.S. Coast Guard from the Panamanian flagged motor vessel Gatun off the coast of Panama in 2007.
  • #37 In June 2008, 262 tons of hashish were seized from narcotics laboratories and underground bunkers (shown on left) within Taliban-controlled areas of the Kandahar Province in Afghanistan, and the hashish bunkers were destroyed. This joint effort of the Afghan government and the DEA’s Foreign-Deployed Advisory and Support Teams represented the largest known drug seizure to date.
  • #38 In June 2008, 262 tons of hashish were seized from narcotics laboratories and underground bunkers (shown on left) within Taliban-controlled areas of the Kandahar Province in Afghanistan, and the hashish bunkers were destroyed. This joint effort of the Afghan government and the DEA’s Foreign-Deployed Advisory and Support Teams represented the largest known drug seizure to date.
  • #42 People of color tend to be stopped and searched more often than others in airports, bus depots, and train stations and on state highways, on the basis of “drug courier” profiles.