Gap data updated1
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•180 views
The document contains data on student enrollment and achievement in virtual and credit recovery courses. It shows patterns of female students and white students outperforming male students and ethnic minority students respectively. Students with higher socioeconomic status also have higher achievement than lower SES students. Under-represented groups are also under-enrolled in virtual courses and over-represented in credit recovery programs.
More Related Content
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Featured
Featured (20)
Gap data updated1
- 2. Enrollment by Ethnicity 42 57 29 25 363 Black Hispanic Asian Other(Indian, Mixed,PI) White Enrollment by Gender 236 279 Male Female Enrollment by SES 105 410 Free/Red Pay
- 3. Achievement by Gender 74.48 82.1 Male Female 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 70 Series1 74.48 82.1 Achievement by Ethnicity 74.76 72.18 87.79 78.97 Black Hispanic Asian White 90 88 86 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 70 Series1 74.76 72.18 87.79 78.97 Achievement bv SES 74.69 79.61 F/R Pay 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 Series1 74.69 79.61
- 4. Enrollment by Gender 40 28 Male Female Enrollment by Ethnicity 16 14 38 Black Hisp/Other White Enrollment by SES 34 34 F/R Pay
- 5. Number of Credits Earned by Gender 16.5 15.5 Male Female 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Series1 16.5 15.5 Number of Credits Earned by Ethnicity 10 5 21 Black Hisp White 25 20 15 10 5 0 Series1 10 5 21 Credits Earned by SES 18 18 F/R Pay 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Series1 18 18
- 6. Personal Finance Enrollment by Gender 124 99 Female Male Personal Finance Enrollment by 57 166 Race Ethnic White Personal Finance Enrollment by SES 38 185 F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroups 80.48 82.6 77.82 77.16 81.62 73.05 82.05 Avg. Gr. Female Male Ethnic White F/R Pay 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 70 68 Series1 80.48 82.6 77.82 77.16 81.62 73.05 82.05
- 7. Wellness Enrollment by 46 41 Gender Female Male Wellness Enrollment by Ethnicity 29 56 Ethnic White Wellness Enrollment by 22 65 SES F/R Pay 80.18 Achievement by Subgroups 83.9 75.9 81.27 79.63 74.95 81.74 Avg. Gr. Female Male Ethnic White F/R Pay 86 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 70 Series1 80.18 83.9 75.9 81.27 79.63 74.95 81.74
- 8. 18 12 Government Enrollment by Gender Male Female Government Enrollment by Race 6 12 Ethnic White Government Enrollment by SES 4 14 F/R Pay 77.94 Achievement by Subgroup 70.5 81.66 74.66 79.58 80.25 77.28 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 70 68 66 64 Series1 77.94 70.5 81.66 74.66 79.58 80.25 77.28
- 9. Enrollment by Gender 27 25 Male Female Enrollment by Race 13 39 Ethnic White Enrollment by SES 9 43 F/R Pay 62.34 Achievement by Subgroup 59.44 65.48 51.769 65.5 46.375 64.81 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Series1 62.34 59.44 65.48 51.769 65.5 46.375 64.81
- 10. Enrollment by Gender 13 15 M F Enrollment by Race 24 4 W A Enrollment by SES 2 26 Free Pay 80.85 Avg. Grade Achievement by Subgroup 78.21 83.5 79.83 87 78.5 81 Male Female White Ethnic(*) Free Pay 88 86 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 Series1 80.85 78.21 83.5 79.83 87 78.5 81
- 11. Enrollment by Gender 5 7 Male Female Enrollment by Race 2 10 Ethnic White Enrollment by SES 0 12 Free/Red Pay 72.16 Achievement by Subgroup 47 90.14 51.5 76.3 Avg Grade Male Female Ethnic White 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Series1 72.16 47 90.14 51.5 76.3
- 12. Enrollment by Gender 8 5 Male Female Enrollment by Race 5 8 Ethnic White Enrollment by SES 3 10 F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroup 56.24 54.91 58.37 76.46 43.6 81.22 48.75 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Series1 56.24 54.91 58.37 76.46 43.6 81.22 48.75
- 13. Enrollment by Gender 15 18 Male Female Enrollment by Race 16 17 Ethnic White Enrollment by SES 13 20 F/R Pay 83.12 Achievement by Subgroup 81.8 84.22 82.43 83.76 78.76 85.95 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay 88 86 84 82 80 78 76 74 Series1 83.12 81.8 84.22 82.43 83.76 78.76 85.95
- 14. Enrollment by Gender 6 7 Male Female Enrollment by Race 3 10 Ethnic White Enrollment by SES 3 10 F/R Pay 94.15 Achievement by Subgroup 91.5 96.42 93.66 94.3 92.33 94.16 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 Series1 94.15 91.5 96.42 93.66 94.3 92.33 94.16
- 15. Enrollment by Gender 6 6 Male Female Enrollment by Race 2 10 Ethnic White Enrollment by SES 2 10 F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroups 82.58 Avg. Grade 78 87.16 96 79.9 95 80.1 Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Series1 82.58 78 87.16 96 79.9 95 80.1
- 16. Enrollment by Gender 2 13 Male Female Enrollment by Race 0 7 5 3 Black Asian Hispanic/Mixed White Enrollment by SES 5 10 Free/Red Pay 95.0667 Avg. Grade Achievement by Subgroup 92.5 95.46 93.57 Male Female Black Asian 96.4 96.33 Hispani c White 95.6 Free/Re d 94.8 Pay 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 Series1 95.0667 92.5 95.46 93.57 96.4 96.33 95.6 94.8
- 17. Enrollment by Gender 0 8 Male Female Enrollment by Race 2 6 Ethnic White Achievement by Subgroup 73.5 73.5 Avg. Grade 63.25 83.75 Male Free/Red Pay 66 Black/His p 76 White 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Series1 73.5 73.5 63.25 83.75 66 76 Enrollment by SES 4 4 F/R Pay
- 18. A pattern of females outperforming males, whites outperforming ethnic students Higher SES outperforming lower SES Under-represented groups not enrolling in virtual courses Under-represented groups over-represented in credit recovery What are the implications? What is our response? How do we close the gaps?
Editor's Notes
- Essential Question for Enrollment Gap: Are our ethnic and poorer students proportionately represented in online enrollment? Using 2013 student demographic data reported to DESE. 30% of our total enrollment enrolled in Virtual/Online courses that were not Credit Recovery/Edgenuity courses. Overall, a few more females enrolled in these courses than males. Our ethnic population is 28.2% and so is represented well in this enrollment at 29.5%. 70.48% of those taking virtual courses were White. Our Lower-Income students are under-represented as 20%of the enrollment in the virtual courses but 25.9% of our total enrollment.
- Essential Question for Achievement in Virtual Courses? Do our ethnic and poorer students perform at the same level as our white wealthier students? The average grade for all students all courses is 78.61%. Females out-performed males with an average of 82.1 to the males 74.48, a difference of over 7 percentage points. Black and Hispanic students achieved slightly below white students, while Asian students out-performed all student groups. Our lower-income students underperformed out wealthier students at 74.69 gr. Avg vs. a nearly 80% average, lower by nearly 5 percentage points and nearly one grade level.
- For Credit Recovery, our male students outnumber female students. Ethnic enrollment is over-represented at 44% compared with 28.2% of our total student population. Whites, with 67.8% of our total population comprise 55% of the enrollment in CR courses. Unbelievable, the SES enrollment is split 50-50, but only 25.9% of our students are F/R lunch while here they account for 50% of the enrollment.
- A total of 36 credits were earned during this time-some full, some ½ credits. At first glance, it would seem males and females achieved equally well with the males just edging out the females, but not considering there were 40 males and 28 females. Whites earned double the number of credits as black students and four times as many as Hispanic/Other students, but they also held 55% of the enrollment. Ethnic students made up 44% of the enrollment and earned 41.66% of the credits with Hispanic students achieving ½ the # of credits as Black students, despite fairly balanced enrollment. Surprisingly, Credits earned by SES were equal, just as the enrollment.
- PF has one of our largest enrollments with 223 total. Females edge outnumber males in PF enrollment, as do White to Ethnic students and Higher SES to lower SES. And again, females, whites, and higher SES students out-perform male, thenic, and lower SES respectively.
- Wellness is one of our larger enrollments with 87 total. Females edge out males in enrollment, white dominates ethnicity and higher income students over F/R. With an average grade of 80.18%, Females outperformed males by 8 percentage points, ethnic students actually edged out white students, but higher income students outperformed lower-income students at nearly 7 percentage points.
- Govt. has an enrollment of 36 and here, there are some slight variances from the previous classes. Males still underperform compared to female students, and whites outperform ethnic students, but lower SES outperforms higher SES by nearly 3 percentage points.
- In AMH, females outperform males, whites the ethnic students, and higher SES the lower SES. Interesting to note the average grade is a 62% in this group/course, as opposed to higher averages in the high 70s low 80s in other courses.
- In AP stats, there is fairly equal gender enrollment, but again, the females outperform the males. However, in this case, ethnic students had a higher average grade than white students, although it should be noted the only ethnicity in this group is Asian. Higher SES achieves higher than lower SES.
- An interesting notes about this course/group-No lower SES subgroup; all students pay for their lunch. Female and White students FAR outperform the males and ethnic students by 20 perecentage points and higher.
- More males than females in this group. Same with White to Ethnic students and Higher income students outnumber lower SES 3x. The average grade here is a failing grade, which one doesn’t usually see. Also, ethnic students and lower SES students far outperform their white and higher-income counterparts. Females still outperformed males, however.
- Enrollment by gender, race, and SES is balanced in this group/course, but the achievement patters persist with females, whites, and wealthier students having higher average grades than male, ethnic, and poorer students, although by somewhat narrow margins and all still with a B average, with the exception of lower SES students.
- This small, summer-school course reflects the similar pattern we have seen: Female students dominate achievement as do white students are higher-income students, although by smaller margins and all in a high grade average at 90+%.
- Some differences in this group are that ethnic and lower-income students significantly outperformed white and wealthier students. Females still out-achieved males. In all cases by a least a letter grade, 2 in the gender comparison.
- Female students outnumber and outperform male students. Interesting note is that White students are outnumbered in the ethnic student group, which also narrowly outperforms whites. Also, lower ses students edge out higher ses students.
- Game Design has no females enrolled at all and a 50-50 SES enrollment. Higher income students far outperform lower-income students and whites outperform ethnic students.