This document summarizes a webinar series on fundamentals in healthcare law presented by the law firm Parsons Behle & Latimer. The September 15, 2021 webinar focused on patient care and included presentations on forming the provider-patient relationship, obtaining patient consent, terminating the relationship, and issues relating to patient capacity. Key topics included how the relationship is established, components of informed consent, avoiding abandonment claims when terminating care, and assessing a patient's decision-making ability. The webinar provided an overview of important legal and ethical considerations in the provider-patient relationship under healthcare law.
The webinar discusses key regulations governing hospitals, including state licensing requirements and federal Conditions of Participation. It also summarizes laws protecting patient rights such as EMTALA, which requires hospitals to provide medical screening exams and stabilize emergency patients regardless of ability to pay. The Idaho Patient Act and No Surprises Act were also overviewed, establishing billing and collections procedures and prohibiting certain out-of-network charges without consent.
New Vaccination Rule: What Does it Mean for Employers with More Than 100 Empl...Parsons Behle & Latimer
This webinar discusses the new OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) requiring employers with over 100 employees to implement mandatory vaccination policies or regular testing and masking. Key points include:
- The ETS takes effect November 5, 2021 and enforcement begins December 6, 2021.
- It applies to employers with 100+ employees but some employees may be excluded.
- Employers must establish and enforce a written vaccination policy or implement weekly testing and masking of unvaccinated employees. They must also provide paid time off for vaccination and recovery.
- Legal challenges have resulted in a stay of the enforcement by some courts while cases are reviewed. Employers are advised to prepare policies but wait for legal clarity.
This document provides an overview and summary of an employment law seminar focused on ADA issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. The seminar covers ADA overview topics such as reasonable accommodations, disability-related inquiries, medical examinations, and safeguarding health information. It then discusses how the ADA applies specifically to the COVID-19 pandemic, including issues around direct threats, protective measures like masks and vaccines, and reasonable accommodations. The seminar concludes with a Q&A section addressing common questions employers have around disability inquiries, medical examinations, and providing reasonable accommodations during the pandemic.
This document summarizes the key points of a seminar on ADA issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. It discusses how the ADA applies to disability-related inquiries, medical examinations, reasonable accommodations, and protective measures in the workplace during the pandemic. The document provides an overview of the ADA and outlines considerations and guidelines for employers in complying with the ADA as they navigate workplace policies and procedures during the COVID-19 crisis.
Got the ADA basics down and ready to tackle the graduate level course on the complex ADA issues that trip up even the best of HR and legal professionals? Gary Clark and Will Walden will tackle complex ADA issues, such as:
-Mental illness accommodations in the workplace
-The intersection between the ADA and workplace violence threats
-Medical marijuana, opioid and prescription drug use in the workplace
-Navigating a direct threat to health and safety decision
-Fitness for duty tests and examinations
-Managing employees on extended leaves after FMLA has expired
-Identifying accommodations that previously were per se unreasonable, but now must be considered
Please join Gary and Will as they cover these and other tough ADA issues in the workplace.
Independent healthcare in house lawyers' forum, March 2018, LondonBrowne Jacobson LLP
In our first independent healthcare in house lawyers' forum for 2018 we cover the following topics:
- claims and liabilities update - including vicarious liability for the acts of non-employees and the post Paterson inquiry
- inquests and other regulatory liabilities
- capacity, consent, and how to not get sued.
The webinar discusses key regulations governing hospitals, including state licensing requirements and federal Conditions of Participation. It also summarizes laws protecting patient rights such as EMTALA, which requires hospitals to provide medical screening exams and stabilize emergency patients regardless of ability to pay. The Idaho Patient Act and No Surprises Act were also overviewed, establishing billing and collections procedures and prohibiting certain out-of-network charges without consent.
New Vaccination Rule: What Does it Mean for Employers with More Than 100 Empl...Parsons Behle & Latimer
This webinar discusses the new OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) requiring employers with over 100 employees to implement mandatory vaccination policies or regular testing and masking. Key points include:
- The ETS takes effect November 5, 2021 and enforcement begins December 6, 2021.
- It applies to employers with 100+ employees but some employees may be excluded.
- Employers must establish and enforce a written vaccination policy or implement weekly testing and masking of unvaccinated employees. They must also provide paid time off for vaccination and recovery.
- Legal challenges have resulted in a stay of the enforcement by some courts while cases are reviewed. Employers are advised to prepare policies but wait for legal clarity.
This document provides an overview and summary of an employment law seminar focused on ADA issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. The seminar covers ADA overview topics such as reasonable accommodations, disability-related inquiries, medical examinations, and safeguarding health information. It then discusses how the ADA applies specifically to the COVID-19 pandemic, including issues around direct threats, protective measures like masks and vaccines, and reasonable accommodations. The seminar concludes with a Q&A section addressing common questions employers have around disability inquiries, medical examinations, and providing reasonable accommodations during the pandemic.
This document summarizes the key points of a seminar on ADA issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. It discusses how the ADA applies to disability-related inquiries, medical examinations, reasonable accommodations, and protective measures in the workplace during the pandemic. The document provides an overview of the ADA and outlines considerations and guidelines for employers in complying with the ADA as they navigate workplace policies and procedures during the COVID-19 crisis.
Got the ADA basics down and ready to tackle the graduate level course on the complex ADA issues that trip up even the best of HR and legal professionals? Gary Clark and Will Walden will tackle complex ADA issues, such as:
-Mental illness accommodations in the workplace
-The intersection between the ADA and workplace violence threats
-Medical marijuana, opioid and prescription drug use in the workplace
-Navigating a direct threat to health and safety decision
-Fitness for duty tests and examinations
-Managing employees on extended leaves after FMLA has expired
-Identifying accommodations that previously were per se unreasonable, but now must be considered
Please join Gary and Will as they cover these and other tough ADA issues in the workplace.
Independent healthcare in house lawyers' forum, March 2018, LondonBrowne Jacobson LLP
In our first independent healthcare in house lawyers' forum for 2018 we cover the following topics:
- claims and liabilities update - including vicarious liability for the acts of non-employees and the post Paterson inquiry
- inquests and other regulatory liabilities
- capacity, consent, and how to not get sued.
Forensic medicine medical negligence 2-bolam principleMBBS IMS MSU
This document discusses medical negligence and the Bolam principle for determining negligence in medical malpractice cases. It provides background on several key cases that helped establish the standard of care. The Bolam principle determines negligence based on whether a doctor's actions fell below the standard of a responsible body of medical professionals. However, it has been criticized for being too protective of doctors. Even if a doctor's actions cause harm, they may not be found negligent under Bolam if other doctors may have acted the same way. The document examines challenges in assessing causation and damages in medical negligence cases.
This newsletter provides a summary of 3 key articles:
1) The EEOC issued new guidance on applying the ADA to cancer, diabetes, epilepsy and intellectual disabilities. It defines these conditions as disabilities and provides examples of reasonable accommodations.
2) Employers must continue complying with IRS regulations for nonqualified deferred compensation plans to avoid penalties. The IRS provides voluntary correction programs for document and operational failures.
3) Comprehensive immigration reform being debated in Congress would impact recruiting, benefits and HR for many employers. The Senate may pass a bill by July and the House is considering separate reform bills.
Insurance, compensation and indemnification of trial subjectsJyotsna Patil
This document discusses insurance and indemnity as they relate to clinical trials. It defines indemnity as providing written assurance that compensation will be paid in the event of injury, while insurance involves paying a premium for a policy that will provide compensation if a claim is made. The document outlines regulations requiring insurance or indemnity to cover the liability of trial sponsors and investigators. It provides examples of compensation arrangements and policies that aim to ensure volunteers are compensated for injuries resulting from their participation in clinical trials.
East Zone Medico Legal Services Pvt. Ltd is a private company that provides legal services for medical professionals facing malpractice claims or other legal issues. Attending their clinical risk and claims management seminar provides benefits such as free legal representation and education on reducing legal risks. The document outlines common types of medical negligence claims and litigation processes. It also provides guidance for doctors on dealing with adverse events, communicating with patients, and legal obligations around reporting injuries or deaths.
the world of dentistry is oblivious to the threat of medico-legal cases and its ramification, a brief into the aspects of dental practice to make it safe for us as well as the patients.
Staff nurse Smith was under pressure on a busy children's ward and failed to properly check the dosage of antibiotics prescribed by a junior doctor for a child with suspected meningitis. The child was given a dosage 1000 times the normal amount and died of renal failure as a result. Nurse Smith could potentially be found liable for negligence resulting in harm. While trying to expedite lunches for patients, nurse Smith entered the kitchen in violation of rules and knocked into a cook, causing hot gravy to spill and burn both of them. The trust may be liable to the injured cook, and nurse Smith could attempt to sue her employer as well.
Anselm Eldergill: The Court of Protection and the Mental Capacity Act: Capaci...Darius Whelan
Judge Anselm Eldergill, Court of Protection
The Court of Protection and the Mental Capacity Act: Capacity to Change?
Presented at Mental Health Law Conference 2015 - Centre for Criminal Justice & Human Rights, School of Law, University College Cork and Irish Mental Health Lawyers Association
25 April 2015
http://www.imhla.ie
#mhlaw2015
Medical negligence occurs when a doctor breaches his duty of care owed to a patient, resulting in injury to the patient. For a claim of medical negligence to be successful, it must be proven that the doctor owed a duty of care, breached this duty, and this breach caused damages to the patient. Some examples of breaches include failing to take an x-ray, misdiagnosis, or leaving surgical tools inside a patient's body. The standard of care owed depends on the doctor's level of training and experience. Between 1985-1989, the Malaysian Medical Council inquired into 36 cases of medical negligence and disciplinary issues, finding 21 practitioners guilty.
This document summarizes the key differences between civil and criminal negligence. Civil negligence involves a simple absence of care and skill, no violation of law, and is tried in civil court. Defenses can include patient consent and contributory negligence. Criminal negligence involves gross carelessness, willful or culpable negligence, and violation of law. It is tried in criminal court and defenses like patient consent and contributory negligence do not apply. Punishment for criminal negligence can include charges under Section 304 A of the Indian Penal Code for death resulting from negligence.
Compliance Overview - Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)ntoscano50
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that makes it illegal for covered employers to discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities in all employment practices, such as recruitment, compensation, hiring and firing, job assignments, training, leave and benefits. Employers with 15 or more employees are covered by the ADA.
The ADA requires a covered employer to provide a reasonable accommodation to an employee or job applicant with a disability, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the employer's business. Reasonable accommodation might include, for example, making the workplace accessible for wheelchair users or providing a reader or interpreter for someone who is blind or hearing impaired.
The Court of Appeal considered an appeal from a worker who sustained a back injury after lifting and twisting while carrying archive boxes at work. While the primary judge found no breach of duty, the Court of Appeal identified some errors but said the worker still needed to show there was a real risk of injury from lifting boxes. The Court of Appeal ultimately dismissed the appeal, finding that lifting a 7kg box and twisting did not necessarily present a real risk of injury, especially since the worker had lifted boxes previously without incident. This case emphasizes that employers are not liable for any risk of injury, only real risks, and that lifting a moderate weight while twisting does not automatically equate to a real risk.
This document discusses various medico-legal concerns for doctors. It emphasizes the importance of proper documentation for things like prescriptions, discharge certificates, medical certificates and operative reports. Doctors should follow standard treatment protocols and avoid unnecessary comments. Record keeping is important and doctors must balance ethics with profitability. The document also stresses the importance of compassion and a humane touch in the medical profession.
The document outlines the process for handling a workers compensation claim from an accident occurring on January 1st, 2012. It discusses investigating the claim, determining coverage, accepting or controverting the claim in a timely manner. If accepted, payments are made based on medical evidence of disability level. Independent medical exams can be requested to obtain different disability levels, requiring payment changes and form filings. The process involves monitoring improvement, holding hearings to determine payment rates, potentially going to trial, and eventually seeking maximum medical improvement and permanent disability status.
The document discusses various confidentiality policies that must be followed in a veterinary practice, including:
1) Employee records and information cannot be shared with other staff without authorization. Medical records and client information are also strictly confidential.
2) An employer cannot disclose details of an employee's termination to other staff without consent.
3) Limited client information like rabies tag numbers can be shared with authorities to help identify lost pets, but full medical records require consent.
The cost of the Immigration Physical Examination depends on Vaccination Requirements and includes the following:
1. Basic Physical Examination
2. Required Blood work
3. Tuberculosis skin testing
4. Vaccination status verification
5. Copies of your laboratory results
6. Certified and Sealed I-693 Form
7. We have the Required Forms at the Office
This document discusses various legal aspects related to medical practice and patient care. It covers 3 main duties of clinical care - protecting life and health, respecting patient autonomy, and ensuring fairness and justice. It also discusses informed consent, medical negligence, legal responsibilities of hospitals, and other medico-legal issues like medical reports, certificates, and handling of criminal cases. Physicians have legal and ethical duties to patients that are enforced through medical regulations, civil lawsuits, and in some cases criminal law. Understanding the applicable laws is important for practicing medicine responsibly and maintaining patient trust.
This document discusses the concepts of informed consent and refusal of treatment. It outlines that patients have the right to refuse treatment as long as it is an informed refusal. For consent or refusal to be valid, the patient must be competent and the decision must be voluntary. The nurse's role is to ensure the patient understands the risks of refusing treatment through education. If refusal is documented, the record must show the teaching provided and that the patient understood risks but still refused.
The good doctors is who is good in relationship to his patients what ever the reason. but do not use your relationship to date a girl in as your her doctor unless you finish that relationship as a medical doctor.
There are a law and ethics that protects the patients and the doctor relationship to prevent the damage or suit for both of them.
As there is relation b/w the patient and doctor there is also a relation b/w doctor and another doctor and this is important both of them to take a care for patient.
Any misunderstanding of both doctors should try to solve it because we do not need to harm the patient.
Current Cases: Medical Staff Nightmares And Fairy TalesQuarles & Brady
This document summarizes a presentation on challenging medical staff issues. It discusses how to determine whether issues with employed physicians should be handled through human resources or the medical staff process. It also covers topics like leave of absence implications, reporting parameters to the National Practitioner Data Bank, fair hearing requirements under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, maintaining confidentiality, ensuring physicians under review have access to relevant documents and can tell their side of the story, dealing with impairment issues, and responding to inquiries about physicians under review.
Forensic medicine medical negligence 2-bolam principleMBBS IMS MSU
This document discusses medical negligence and the Bolam principle for determining negligence in medical malpractice cases. It provides background on several key cases that helped establish the standard of care. The Bolam principle determines negligence based on whether a doctor's actions fell below the standard of a responsible body of medical professionals. However, it has been criticized for being too protective of doctors. Even if a doctor's actions cause harm, they may not be found negligent under Bolam if other doctors may have acted the same way. The document examines challenges in assessing causation and damages in medical negligence cases.
This newsletter provides a summary of 3 key articles:
1) The EEOC issued new guidance on applying the ADA to cancer, diabetes, epilepsy and intellectual disabilities. It defines these conditions as disabilities and provides examples of reasonable accommodations.
2) Employers must continue complying with IRS regulations for nonqualified deferred compensation plans to avoid penalties. The IRS provides voluntary correction programs for document and operational failures.
3) Comprehensive immigration reform being debated in Congress would impact recruiting, benefits and HR for many employers. The Senate may pass a bill by July and the House is considering separate reform bills.
Insurance, compensation and indemnification of trial subjectsJyotsna Patil
This document discusses insurance and indemnity as they relate to clinical trials. It defines indemnity as providing written assurance that compensation will be paid in the event of injury, while insurance involves paying a premium for a policy that will provide compensation if a claim is made. The document outlines regulations requiring insurance or indemnity to cover the liability of trial sponsors and investigators. It provides examples of compensation arrangements and policies that aim to ensure volunteers are compensated for injuries resulting from their participation in clinical trials.
East Zone Medico Legal Services Pvt. Ltd is a private company that provides legal services for medical professionals facing malpractice claims or other legal issues. Attending their clinical risk and claims management seminar provides benefits such as free legal representation and education on reducing legal risks. The document outlines common types of medical negligence claims and litigation processes. It also provides guidance for doctors on dealing with adverse events, communicating with patients, and legal obligations around reporting injuries or deaths.
the world of dentistry is oblivious to the threat of medico-legal cases and its ramification, a brief into the aspects of dental practice to make it safe for us as well as the patients.
Staff nurse Smith was under pressure on a busy children's ward and failed to properly check the dosage of antibiotics prescribed by a junior doctor for a child with suspected meningitis. The child was given a dosage 1000 times the normal amount and died of renal failure as a result. Nurse Smith could potentially be found liable for negligence resulting in harm. While trying to expedite lunches for patients, nurse Smith entered the kitchen in violation of rules and knocked into a cook, causing hot gravy to spill and burn both of them. The trust may be liable to the injured cook, and nurse Smith could attempt to sue her employer as well.
Anselm Eldergill: The Court of Protection and the Mental Capacity Act: Capaci...Darius Whelan
Judge Anselm Eldergill, Court of Protection
The Court of Protection and the Mental Capacity Act: Capacity to Change?
Presented at Mental Health Law Conference 2015 - Centre for Criminal Justice & Human Rights, School of Law, University College Cork and Irish Mental Health Lawyers Association
25 April 2015
http://www.imhla.ie
#mhlaw2015
Medical negligence occurs when a doctor breaches his duty of care owed to a patient, resulting in injury to the patient. For a claim of medical negligence to be successful, it must be proven that the doctor owed a duty of care, breached this duty, and this breach caused damages to the patient. Some examples of breaches include failing to take an x-ray, misdiagnosis, or leaving surgical tools inside a patient's body. The standard of care owed depends on the doctor's level of training and experience. Between 1985-1989, the Malaysian Medical Council inquired into 36 cases of medical negligence and disciplinary issues, finding 21 practitioners guilty.
This document summarizes the key differences between civil and criminal negligence. Civil negligence involves a simple absence of care and skill, no violation of law, and is tried in civil court. Defenses can include patient consent and contributory negligence. Criminal negligence involves gross carelessness, willful or culpable negligence, and violation of law. It is tried in criminal court and defenses like patient consent and contributory negligence do not apply. Punishment for criminal negligence can include charges under Section 304 A of the Indian Penal Code for death resulting from negligence.
Compliance Overview - Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)ntoscano50
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that makes it illegal for covered employers to discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities in all employment practices, such as recruitment, compensation, hiring and firing, job assignments, training, leave and benefits. Employers with 15 or more employees are covered by the ADA.
The ADA requires a covered employer to provide a reasonable accommodation to an employee or job applicant with a disability, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the employer's business. Reasonable accommodation might include, for example, making the workplace accessible for wheelchair users or providing a reader or interpreter for someone who is blind or hearing impaired.
The Court of Appeal considered an appeal from a worker who sustained a back injury after lifting and twisting while carrying archive boxes at work. While the primary judge found no breach of duty, the Court of Appeal identified some errors but said the worker still needed to show there was a real risk of injury from lifting boxes. The Court of Appeal ultimately dismissed the appeal, finding that lifting a 7kg box and twisting did not necessarily present a real risk of injury, especially since the worker had lifted boxes previously without incident. This case emphasizes that employers are not liable for any risk of injury, only real risks, and that lifting a moderate weight while twisting does not automatically equate to a real risk.
This document discusses various medico-legal concerns for doctors. It emphasizes the importance of proper documentation for things like prescriptions, discharge certificates, medical certificates and operative reports. Doctors should follow standard treatment protocols and avoid unnecessary comments. Record keeping is important and doctors must balance ethics with profitability. The document also stresses the importance of compassion and a humane touch in the medical profession.
The document outlines the process for handling a workers compensation claim from an accident occurring on January 1st, 2012. It discusses investigating the claim, determining coverage, accepting or controverting the claim in a timely manner. If accepted, payments are made based on medical evidence of disability level. Independent medical exams can be requested to obtain different disability levels, requiring payment changes and form filings. The process involves monitoring improvement, holding hearings to determine payment rates, potentially going to trial, and eventually seeking maximum medical improvement and permanent disability status.
The document discusses various confidentiality policies that must be followed in a veterinary practice, including:
1) Employee records and information cannot be shared with other staff without authorization. Medical records and client information are also strictly confidential.
2) An employer cannot disclose details of an employee's termination to other staff without consent.
3) Limited client information like rabies tag numbers can be shared with authorities to help identify lost pets, but full medical records require consent.
The cost of the Immigration Physical Examination depends on Vaccination Requirements and includes the following:
1. Basic Physical Examination
2. Required Blood work
3. Tuberculosis skin testing
4. Vaccination status verification
5. Copies of your laboratory results
6. Certified and Sealed I-693 Form
7. We have the Required Forms at the Office
This document discusses various legal aspects related to medical practice and patient care. It covers 3 main duties of clinical care - protecting life and health, respecting patient autonomy, and ensuring fairness and justice. It also discusses informed consent, medical negligence, legal responsibilities of hospitals, and other medico-legal issues like medical reports, certificates, and handling of criminal cases. Physicians have legal and ethical duties to patients that are enforced through medical regulations, civil lawsuits, and in some cases criminal law. Understanding the applicable laws is important for practicing medicine responsibly and maintaining patient trust.
This document discusses the concepts of informed consent and refusal of treatment. It outlines that patients have the right to refuse treatment as long as it is an informed refusal. For consent or refusal to be valid, the patient must be competent and the decision must be voluntary. The nurse's role is to ensure the patient understands the risks of refusing treatment through education. If refusal is documented, the record must show the teaching provided and that the patient understood risks but still refused.
The good doctors is who is good in relationship to his patients what ever the reason. but do not use your relationship to date a girl in as your her doctor unless you finish that relationship as a medical doctor.
There are a law and ethics that protects the patients and the doctor relationship to prevent the damage or suit for both of them.
As there is relation b/w the patient and doctor there is also a relation b/w doctor and another doctor and this is important both of them to take a care for patient.
Any misunderstanding of both doctors should try to solve it because we do not need to harm the patient.
Current Cases: Medical Staff Nightmares And Fairy TalesQuarles & Brady
This document summarizes a presentation on challenging medical staff issues. It discusses how to determine whether issues with employed physicians should be handled through human resources or the medical staff process. It also covers topics like leave of absence implications, reporting parameters to the National Practitioner Data Bank, fair hearing requirements under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, maintaining confidentiality, ensuring physicians under review have access to relevant documents and can tell their side of the story, dealing with impairment issues, and responding to inquiries about physicians under review.
The document discusses several key legal aspects of medical practice including informed consent, medical negligence, and medico-legal cases. It notes that with advances in medicine, a careful construction of professional ethics is needed. The duties of clinical care - to protect life and health, respect autonomy, and ensure fairness and justice - are derived from patients' basic rights. Failure to meet the standard of care can result in medical negligence or criminal charges in some cases. Consent, confidentiality, and documentation of medical reports and certificates are also important legal considerations.
This document discusses end-of-life decision making through advance directives. It defines three types of advance directives: living wills, durable power of attorney for healthcare, and general advance directives. Living wills allow patients to specify treatment preferences if they become terminal or permanently unconscious. Durable power of attorney appoints a healthcare proxy. General advance directives provide instructions and may appoint a proxy. The document outlines requirements, limitations, and the nurse's role in educating patients and ensuring advance directives are documented and followed.
The document discusses several key legal and ethical aspects of medical practice. It outlines 3 main duties of clinical care - protecting life and health, respecting patient autonomy, and ensuring fairness and justice. It also discusses informed consent, medical negligence, legal concepts like duty of care and tort, and challenges like medical reports, certificates, and terminal illness cases. Ensuring ethical practice is important to maintain trust in the doctor-patient relationship and avoid legal issues.
This document discusses professional negligence in the medical field. It begins by defining professional negligence as a lack of reasonable care and skill by a medical practitioner that causes harm to a patient. It then outlines some key points regarding professional negligence:
- Doctors are required to possess reasonable medical knowledge and exercise reasonable care and skill as determined by their peers.
- There are two main types of negligence - civil and criminal. Civil negligence can be compensated financially, while criminal negligence involves willful disregard for a patient's life and safety.
- For a malpractice suit, there must be a duty of care, a failure to fulfill that duty, a direct link between that failure and harm to the patient, and demonstrable
Informed consent is required before any medical treatment and involves explaining the risks and benefits to help patients understand their treatment options. There are three main types of consent - implied, verbal, and written. Informed consent includes describing the clinical issue, proposed treatment and alternatives, discussing risks and benefits, assessing patient understanding, and obtaining their preference. Key principles are that consent must be given voluntarily without pressure, the patient must have capacity, and consent is ongoing. Informed consent is important for trust between doctors and patients and protects patient autonomy and rights. It is generally required for medical procedures but not in emergencies when immediate treatment is necessary.
Legal aspects of nursing philnursingstudentpinoy nurze
This document discusses several key legal aspects of nursing practice including:
- State nurse practice acts that regulate nursing scope and standards.
- Requirement for an active nursing license to legally practice.
- Ethical principles like patient autonomy, beneficence, and informed consent.
- Legal documentation standards for nursing notes and physician orders.
- Liability considerations for nurses and hospitals regarding negligence and mistakes.
- Guidelines for use of patient restraints and requirements for informed consent.
Medico Legal Consent Taking and Its Importance.pptxDrSuhasaniJain1
This document discusses informed consent in healthcare. It begins by defining informed consent and explaining why it is important, such as building trust, respecting patient autonomy, and fulfilling legal and ethical obligations. It then describes the different types of consent (informed, implied, expressed), elements of informed consent like information disclosure and patient understanding, and challenges in the consent process like language barriers. It discusses the legal aspects of consent and consequences of non-compliance. Finally, it briefly outlines when consents are typically obtained, how long they are valid for, when spouse consent may be advisable, and that spouse consent is not mandatory for organ donation under Indian law.
The document discusses key concepts related to nursing documentation and legal liability, including:
1) The purposes of medical records which include substantiating patient health conditions, communicating among providers, recording patient response to care, and resolving legal issues.
2) Key definitions like negligence, the standard of care, and elements of a negligence claim.
3) Common flaws in medical records that plaintiff's attorneys look for such as undocumented gaps, deviations from policies, and biased comments.
4) Strategies for strong documentation including objective assessments, timeliness, and avoiding personal opinions.
Week#4-To Do List-CCHIntroduction To Consent and Documenta.docxphilipnelson29183
Week#4-To Do List-CCH
Introduction To Consent and Documentation
Documentation of patient consent to provide care, to disclose (or not disclose) information and other issues provide the necessary proof of compliance.
Objectives
To successfully complete this learning unit, you will be expected to:
Determine situations where consent is required.
Identify each type of written consent.
Determine the qualifications for a compliance officer.
Set internal policies for acquiring patient consent.
Establish a process to handle release of information.
Week 4: Discussion
Answer the following questions
1. Discuss the importance of the idea that everyone should complete an advance directive
2. Discuss the issue of super confidentiality
Week 4: Case Study Assignment
Include a response to the following case study:
Case study on page 75 of your textbook. (This is the first case study in the chapter and is titled "Chapter Case Study." It starts with: “Calls to Blue Cross Blue Shield Michigan’s (BCBSM) Anti-Fraud Hotline led to an . . .")
Your paper must address the following:
Address problem of the case decision
A thorough analysis including resources
Detailed comprehensive realistic recommendation
Supplements with extensive compelling evidence from legitimate sources
Sources cited correctly in the body of the case and reference page
Chapter Case Study
“July 28, 2003: A physician from Minneapolis, MN, agreed to pay $53,400 to resolve his liability under the CMP [Civil Monetary Penalties] provision applicable to violations of a provider’s assignment agreement. By accepting assignment for all covered services, a participating provider agrees that he or she will not collect from Medicare beneficiary more than applicable deductible and coinsurance for covered services.”
“The OIG alleged that the physician created a program whereby the physician’s patients were asked to sign a yearly contract and pay a yearly fee for services that the physician characterized as ‘not covered’ by Medicare. The OIG further alleged that because at least some of the services described in the contract were actually covered and reimbursable by Medicare, each contract presented to the Medicare patients constituted a request for payment other than the coinsurance and applicable deductible for covered services. In violation of these terms of the physician’s assignment agreement. In addition to payment of the settlement amount, the physician agreed not to request similar payments from beneficiaries in the future.” (http://www.oig.hhs.gov)
Essentials of Health Care Compliance
Week Three
Compliance: Patient Consent
Learning Outcomes
Identify the various situations in which consent is required
Determine the components of each type of written consent form
Explain the types of advance directives
Establish internal policies for acquiring patient consent
Design a process to handle release of information
The single biggest probl.
This document discusses informed consent in healthcare. It defines informed consent and its key components, including discussing the treatment plan, risks, benefits, alternatives, and ensuring the patient understands and is free from coercion. The document outlines principles of respecting patient autonomy, doing no harm, acting in their best interest, and fairness. It discusses assessing patient competence and capacity. Special considerations for informed consent in anesthesia are also covered, such as for Jehovah's Witnesses, minors, and pregnant women.
Professional Negligence in law of torts.pptxs59j8j6fjd
Professional negligence occurs when a professional fails to fulfill their duties to a client with reasonable care. The Bolam test establishes that a professional is not negligent if they acted in a way considered acceptable by a responsible body of their peers, even if some disagree. However, there is an exception if the practice was inherently unsafe. The Sidaway case affirmed Bolam and found a doctor not negligent for not warning of a small risk as peers also would not warn. While professionals have discretion, courts ensure practices are not unsafe.
Contracts & Intentional Torts
Healthcare Law: Class 4
• Elements
• Defenses
Terms/Definition
• Liability: legal responsibility for one’s acts or omissions
• Cause of action: the basis of a law suit. Sufficient legal grounds
and alleged fact that, if proven, would constitute all the
requirements for the plaintiff to prevail
• Legal duty: he responsibility to others to act according to the
law; may be imposed by constitution, legislation, common law, or
contract
• Affidavit: written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation,
for use as evidence, but NOT in place of in-court testimony
• Statute of Limitations: Any law that bars claims after a certain
period of time passes after an injury. The period of time varies
depending on the jurisdiction and the type of claim.
1. Offer
2. Acceptance
3. Consideration* must be given
4. Legality
Elements of a Contract
*act of each party exchanging something of value to their detriment
1. Offer
2. Acceptance
3. Consideration* must be given
• Something of value must be given & received
• $$, work, doing or NOT doing something
4. Legality
• Purpose of the contract must be legal
• Parties must be competent
• Certain contracts must be in writing (property, contracts that cannot
be performed in less than a year, contracts that guarantee the debt
of another person
Elements of a Contract
“Meeting of the Minds”
*act of each party exchanging something of value to their detriment
Express vs. Implied Contract
• Express = written and/or spoken
• Implied = based on facts & circumstances
i.e. ordering food at a restaurant
patient makes appointment with MD
Physician-Patient Relationship: Circumstances
• Does a physician need to come into direct contact with the
patient?
• A physician is hired by ABC corporation to examine a patient
for a pre-employment physical. To whom does the physician
have a legal duty?
Workers’ Compensation
• General rule: Workers’ Comp is an employee’s exclusive
legal remedy for a workplace injury or illness
• Employees cannot make negligence or other legal claims
against their employers
• DUAL CAPACITY DOCTRINE EXCEPTION: when an employer operates
as both an employer AND a health care provider, in some states,
such as OH and CA
Physician-Patient Relationship: Scope of Duty
Physician:
• agrees to diagnose and treat patient consistent with the standard of
acceptable medical practice until the “natural termination” of the
relationship
• agrees not to abandon the patient
• does not agree to CURE the patient
• May be relieved of liability if the patient does not follow orders
• Express promises can be viewed as a warranty
• Has a duty to report diseases determined to be “reportable” by the state
and/or federal government (i.e. STDs, HIV, seizure disorder, risk of
harm/death, threatened by patient)
Patient:
• agrees to pay, or have insurance pay, for services
• does not have to agree (legally) to follow the orders of the ...
This document provides an overview of contracts, intentional torts, and healthcare law. It defines key concepts like liability, cause of action, and legal duty. It outlines the elements of a contract including offer, acceptance, consideration, and legality. It also discusses various intentional torts that can occur in a healthcare setting such as assault, battery, defamation, false imprisonment, invasion of privacy, breach of confidentiality, and misrepresentation. Defenses, elements, and examples are provided for each tort.
Forensic Psychiatry & Ethics in Psychiatry.pptxDR MUKESH SAH
The document discusses several topics related to forensic psychiatry and medical ethics, including forensic psychiatry, medical malpractice, negligent prescription practices, privilege and confidentiality, high-risk clinical situations, and hospitalization procedures. It provides details on the definition and scope of forensic psychiatry. It also explains the key elements needed to prove medical malpractice and discusses areas where negligent prescription practices could result in malpractice suits.
This document outlines patient rights and ethics in healthcare. It defines a patient bill of rights as guaranteeing ethical care and decision making for clients. The purposes are to ensure ethical treatment for all people receiving care. A patient bill of rights typically articulates positive rights like access to records, informed consent, and privacy. It also discusses protecting patient privacy and concerns around trusting healthcare organizations with personal health information.
This document outlines various patient rights and ethics related to healthcare. It discusses the purpose of delineating patient rights to ensure ethical treatment. Some key rights mentioned include the right to informed consent, privacy, access medical records, file complaints, and continuity of care. It also discusses ethics principles like autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice and various codes of ethics for healthcare professionals. Additionally, it provides an overview of the US Senate passed Patient's Bill of Rights that would ensure patients have rights like access to specialists and emergency care.
Similar to Fundamentals in Healthcare Law Webinar - Patient Care (20)
Microsoft provided many of the accommodations requested by an employee with Autism Spectrum Disorder, but rejected some that would have excused the employee from performing essential job functions as an Enterprise Architect. These essential functions included communicating ideas to clients, responding quickly to clients under dynamic conditions, and handling basic administrative tasks. When negotiations over alternative accommodations were unsuccessful, Microsoft placed the employee on job reassignment but the employee did not pursue other positions. The court concluded Microsoft did not fail to reasonably accommodate the employee.
Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...Parsons Behle & Latimer
This presentation discusses best practices for employee discipline and termination to avoid legal risks. It emphasizes having clear job descriptions and policies, training employees on policies, consistently applying policies, and thoroughly documenting all communication and disciplinary actions. Case studies are presented to illustrate how failures to properly recognize disabilities, document issues, and focus on misconduct rather than protected characteristics can result in legal liability. The presentation stresses communicating expectations, intervening early, escalating discipline, and ensuring HR involvement in termination decisions.
The presentation discusses various human resources law issues that can arise during employment, including performance evaluations, leave, accommodations, workplace rules and culture, and discipline. It provides examples of proper and improper documentation for performance reviews and outlines a best practices roadmap for handling performance-based employee discharge. The presentation also examines case studies on the value of independent investigations, managing workplace conflict, and avoiding retaliation.
This document summarizes confidentiality issues arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). It discusses HIPAA compliance obligations for employers, including the notice of privacy practices, appointing a privacy officer, training employees, and implementing safeguards for protected health information. It also reviews other laws protecting employee health information, such as the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, Title VII, ADA, and FMLA. The presentation emphasizes the importance of properly handling and securing sensitive employee medical records.
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which requires certain entities to report beneficial ownership information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). It outlines what entities must report, the information that must be reported for each beneficial owner, exemptions, penalties for noncompliance, and restrictions on how FinCEN can disclose the beneficial ownership information. Reporting of beneficial ownership information to FinCEN will start on January 1, 2024 and must be completed by January 1, 2025. Entities must also continuously update their beneficial ownership reports within 30 days of any changes.
The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...Parsons Behle & Latimer
The Supreme Court struck down the Obama-era Clean Power Plan under the Major Questions Doctrine. The Major Questions Doctrine applies when an agency asserts broad new authority over an important issue that Congress did not clearly delegate. The Court found EPA did not have clear congressional authorization to issue industry-wide emissions regulations under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act, as the CPP demanded major shifts in energy production beyond EPA's traditional authority. This decision raises questions about how the Major Questions Doctrine could impact administrative agencies and their interpretations of statutes in the future.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Fundamentals in Healthcare Law Webinar - Patient Care
1. Fundamentals in Healthcare Law Curriculum
2021 – 2022 WEBINAR SERIES
PA R S O N S B E H L E . C O M
N AT I O N A L E X P E R T I S E . R E G I O N A L L AW F I R M .
Patient Care
Wednesday, Sept. 15, 2021
3. 3
Presenters
• J. Kevin West
208.562.4908
kwest@parsonsbehle.com
• Andrew R. Alder
208.562.4879
aalder@parsonsbehle.com
• C. Edward Cather III
208.528.5224
ecather@parsonsbehle.com
4. 4
Today’s Topic: PATIENT CARE
• We will explore various aspects of the provider/patient relationship
and how that impacts patient care
5. 5
Kevin West: When and how the provider relationship is formed
Patient consent to treatment
Andrew Alder: Terminating the provider-patient relationship
Ed Cather: Patient competency
Powers of Attorney
Living Wills/Advanced Directives
7. 7
Without a doctor-patient relationship –
1) A patient cannot sue for malpractice
2) A patient cannot seek ongoing treatment
3) The doctor cannot be reimbursed for services
8. 8
The formation of a provider-patient relationship is based on the law of
contracts:
• Express contract
• Implied contract
9. 9
Is a provider obligated to accept every patient who walks in the
door?
• No – unless you have an agreement with a third-party payer that
requires you to do so
10. 10
Indications of the formation of a relationship:
1) The provider bills for something
or
2) The provider undertakes some affirmative action for the patient
(even if there is no billing)
or
3) The provider had a duty to take some action (e.g., “on-call doctor”),
even if the patient was never actually seen
12. 12
Hallway Consultations
Q: Does a “hallway consult” create a provider-patient relationship?
A: It depends. If there is just a general discussion as to how to
generally treat conditions, then no. But if the consulting doctor
suggests a specific course of treatment, then there possibly yes.
13. 13
Residents and Supervisors
• A split of authority exists among the courts as to whether the
supervising physician for a resident has a provider-patient
relationship
14. 14
Referrals to Specialists
A Georgia court ruled that a primary care provider who referred a
patient could be responsible for “negligent referral”, where the
referring doctor merely did a cursory evaluation and determined that
the referral was appropriate.
15. 15
Independent Medical Examinations
• A majority of courts rule that no provider-patient relationship is
created (e.g., workers comp, disability or other insurance exams)
• But – if serious adverse findings are made during the evaluation
there is likely a duty to notify the individual
18. 18
Consent to Medical Treatment
• Some general principles today
• For more in-depth discussion of Idaho law join us next month on
October 20
19. 19
The doctrine of consent is based on the ethical principle of individual
autonomy
20. 20
“No right is held more sacred than the right of every
individual to the possession and control of his own
person, free from all restraint or interference by
others.”
US Supreme Court, 1891
21. 21
Basic Components of Consent
1) The patient must have the capacity to decide
2) The patient must have sufficient information
3) Consent to care also includes the right to refuse care
22. 22
“Capacity to Decide”
• This is generally determined by the provider based upon his/her
face-to-face evaluation of the patient
• When doubt/concerns exist, family and other providers should be
consulted
23. 23
“Sufficient Information”
1) The patient’s condition
2) The nature of the proposed care
3) The expected benefits of the care
4) The material risks of the proposed care or going without care
5) Treatment alternatives
24. 24
Informed consent is a process, it is not a piece of paper
Consent forms merely document the process that hopefully
took place
25. 25
Mechanics of Consent
1) May be oral or written
If written, there is a rebuttable presumption of informed consent under
Idaho law
2) Contents of the consent form
Name of procedure (in medical and lay terms if possible)
Risks
Benefits
Opportunity to ask questions
3) Do all procedures require formal consent, or just “major” ones?
26. 26
Special Situations
1) Incompetent patients
A surrogate is needed
See list of surrogates in Idaho Code Section 39-4504
2) Unconscious or incapacitated patients
See list of surrogates in Idaho Code Section 39-4504
3) End of life/refusal of care
A complex issue
Physician-assisted suicide is not legal in Idaho, but there is a right to a
“natural death”
28. 28
Ending Provider-Patient Relationship
When Does the Provider-Patient Relationship End?
• Treatment is no longer necessary;
• Patient terminates the relationship; or
• Provider terminates the relationship.
29. 29
Ending Provider-Patient Relationship
Provider can terminate the relationship for any non-discriminatory
reason, such as:
• non-compliance;
• non-payment;
• drug-seeking behavior;
• Etc.
BUT, regardless of the reason, must provide appropriate notice to
avoid a claim of “abandonment.”
30. 30
Avoiding “Abandonment” Claims
What is Patient Abandonment?
• Ending the provider-patient relationship (1) while the patient
actively needs care and (2) without adequate notice that allows
the patient reasonable time to obtain care elsewhere.
Consequences & Penalties:
• Patient can bring a lawsuit for damages
• Board of Medicine disciplinary action (I.C. § 54-1814(15))
31. 31
Avoiding “Abandonment” Claims
Real-World Examples of Patient Abandonment
Provider intentionally refuses to treat a patient who has failed to pay his or her medical bill
Provider is unavailable for an unreasonable amount of time when a patient needs medical
care—and so is the backup (or "on call") doctor
Medical staff fails to reach out to patient who has missed important follow-up appointment
Medical staff fails to communicate a question from the patient to the provider
Appointment scheduled too far in the future, resulting in harm to the patient as their
condition worsens that could have been prevented.
When hospital has inadequate staffing
32. 32
Avoiding “Abandonment” Claims
Remember provider-patient relationship does not automatically end,
even under the following circumstances:
• Outstanding bill
• Patient changes insurance coverage and is no longer covered
• Patient is suing the provider
• Managed care plan “deselects” you
• Etc. etc.
Must still provide appropriate notice by sending a “dismissal letter.”
33. 33
Avoiding “Abandonment” Claims
The Dismissal Letter – Do’s and Don’ts
Do:
• State that patient is being dismissed
You don’t need to provide a reason, though this can be appropriate. Less is
more.
• State risks of not continuing treatment with another provider
• State official date of termination (30 days generally fine)
During this time, you should provide emergency care and prescription refills.
• Inform patient of the right to access and obtain medical records
• Retain copy of dismissal letter for patient’s medical record
34. 34
Avoiding “Abandonment” Claims
The Dismissal Letter – Do’s and Don’ts, continued….
Don’t:
• Criticize the patient and/or appear hostile
• Terminate the relationship during a vulnerable time, such as
immediately after an operation
37. 37
Why is Medical Decision-Making Capacity important?
“Medical decision-making capacity is the ability of a patient to
understand the benefits and risks of, and the alternatives to, a
proposed treatment or intervention.” Craig Barstow et. al., Evaluating Medical
Decision-Making Capacity in Practice, Am Fam Physician, 2018 July 1;98(1):40-46.
Put simply, Medical Decision-Making Capacity is the basis of informed
consent.
◦ Except in emergencies, informed consent is necessary for a patient’s treatment. Robert
Aldridge, Idaho Senate Bill 1068-the Medical Consent Act and Natural Death Act, 48 Advocate 21 (2005).
38. 38
Who makes the determination on a patient’s capacity?
• Consultation with a psychiatrist may be helpful in some cases, but
the final determination on capacity is made by the treating physician.
◦ HOWEVER, a patient’s power of attorney or living will may designate a
specific person to determine the patient’s loss of capacity. In such cases, the
surrogate decision maker should be identified and consulted.
• BUT if the patient is unable to give consent and identifying a
surrogate decision maker will result in a delay that might increase
the risk of death or serious harm, physicians can provide emergency
care without formal consent.
Idaho Code § 15-12-109
39. 39
When is capacity assessed?
• Capacity is assessed intuitively at every medical encounter and is
usually readily apparent.
◦ However, a more formal capacity evaluation should be considered if there is
reason to question a patient's decision-making abilities.
Some examples of situations requiring a more formal capacity evaluation include:
– Acute change in mental status
– Refusal of a clearly beneficial recommended treatment
– Readily agreeing to an invasive or risky procedure without adequately considering the risks
and benefits
40. 40
How do providers determine capacity?
Patients must be able to:
1. Demonstrate understanding of the benefits and risks of, and the alternatives
to, a proposed treatment or intervention (including no treatment);
2. Demonstrate appreciation of those benefits, risks, and alternatives;
3. Show reasoning in making a decision; and
4. Communicate their choice
Because these four elements are built into everyday dialogue and interactions, it
can be assumed that patients have the capacity to make medical decisions if their
conversation demonstrates basic logic. See Craig Barstow et. al., Evaluating Medical Decision-
Making Capacity in Practice, Am Fam Physician, 2018 July 1;98(1):40-46.
41. 41
What are some examples of questions for providers to
ask their patients to assist in determining capacity?
Questions to determine the patient's ability to understand
treatment and care options
• What is your understanding of your condition?
• What are the options for your situation?
• What is your understanding of the benefits of treatment, and what are the
odds that the treatment will work for you?
• What are the risks of treatment, and what are the odds that you may have
a side effect or bad outcome?
• What is your understanding of what will happen if nothing is done?
42. 42
What are some examples of questions for providers to
ask their patients to assist in determining capacity?
Questions to determine the patient's ability to appreciate how
that information applies to his or her own situation
• Tell me what you really believe about your medical condition.
• Why do you think your doctor has recommended (specific treatment/test)
for you?
• Do you think (specific treatment/test) is best for you? Why or why not?
• What do you think will actually happen to you if you accept this treatment?
If you don't accept it?
43. 43
What are some examples of questions for providers to
ask their patients to assist in determining capacity?
Questions to determine the patient's ability to reason with that
information in a manner supported by the facts and the patient's
own values
• What factors/issues are most important to you in deciding about your
treatment? What are you thinking about as you consider your decision?
• How are you balancing the pluses and minuses of the treatments?
• Do you trust your doctor? Why or why not?
• What do you think will happen to you now?
44. 44
What are some examples of questions for providers to
ask their patients to assist in determining capacity?
Questions to determine the patient's ability to communicate and
express a choice clearly
• You have been given a lot of information about your condition. Have you
decided what medical option is best for you right now?
• We have discussed several choices. What do you want to do?
45. 45
What should a provider do if they determine the
patient lacks capacity?
• Find out if the patient has given anyone power of attorney for health
care or executed a living will/advanced health care directive.
◦ The department of health and welfare for the State of Idaho maintains a
health care directive registry. Idaho Code § 39-4515. This can be found on
the Secretary of State’s website at https://sos.idaho.gov/health-care-
directive-registry-index/.
• If these situations do not apply, the treating physician acts in
accordance with their best professional judgment.
46. 46
What if the patient has capacity but also has a
living will or power of attorney?
• The wishes of a patient with adequate capacity take priority over
powers of attorney or living wills.
Idaho Code § 39-4511A; 39-4511B.
48. 48
What is a Power of Attorney for Health Care?
• A power of attorney for health care, or health care proxy, is a legal
designation by which one person, the principal, decides the extent that
another person, the agent, can make decisions for him or her concerning
health care.
• In other words, a health care power of attorney allows the patient to grant
a trusted person the authority to make medical and end-of-life care
decisions on their behalf.
• Generally, the person designated can be anyone so long as they are at
least 18 years of age.
◦ However, health care providers, community care facilities, and their respective
employees are excluded.
50. 50
What is a Living Will/Advanced Directive?
• A living will (also commonly called an Advanced Directive) allows a patient to
communicate to those around them what kind of care they do, or do not, want in the
event they are unable to communicate their wishes because of a debilitating injury or
illness.
• Living wills can be very specific or general. Some examples of terms commonly found
in living wills are:
◦ Opting between being placed on ventilation support
◦ Being attached to feeding tubes
◦ Receiving pain medication
◦ Being given IV fluids to keep the person alive even if his or her quality of life is low.
• These directives are different than a Do Not Resuscitate Order, which is focused on one
type of medical procedure and may not require the situation to be as dire as those
traditionally involved with advance directives.
51. 51
When does a power of attorney or a living will
become effective?
• The default rule is that a powers of attorney or a living will become
effective when executed.
• However, the patient may reserve efficacy until the occurrence of a
future event or contingency.
◦ This is not the default rule and is only the case when the power of attorney
explicitly reserves efficacy.
Idaho Code § 39-4512; 15-12-109.
52. 52
The Revocation of Living Wills or Powers of Attorney
• A living will or power of attorney for health care may be revoked at
any time by the patient by any of the following methods:
◦ The destruction of the document
◦ Signing a writing which expresses intent to revoke
◦ Any other action that clearly manifests the patient’s intent to revoke
• There is no liability for a health care provider who does not have
actual knowledge of such a revocation.
Idaho Code § 39-4511A.
54. 54
What if the patient has both a living will and a
power of attorney that conflict?
• The patient’s health care agent (the person having power of
attorney) cannot overrule any of the provisions of the patients living
will.
• They can supplement the patient’s wishes if something comes up
that the patient did not anticipate.
55. 55
What if the power of attorney or living will was
made in another state?
• Idaho’s policy is to liberally give effect to “any authentic expression
of the person’s prior wishes or directives concerning his or her health
care.”
• However, the person’s prior wishes or directives cannot authorize or
force:
◦ Euthanasia (mercy killing or assisted suicide)
◦ Futile care (medical treatment that is inappropriate or futile)
Idaho Code § 39-4514.
56. 56
What if the terms of the living will go against the
standard of care?
• Health care providers and personnel are immune from civil or
criminal liability as well as discipline for unprofessional conduct for
acts or omissions carried out or performed in good faith pursuant to
living wills or other health directives. Idaho Code § 39-4513.
Idaho Code § 39-4513.
57. 57
Thank You
• J. Kevin West
208.562.4908
kwest@parsonsbehle.com
• Andrew R. Alder
208.562.4879
aalder@parsonsbehle.com
• C. Edward Cather III
208.528.5224
ecather@parsonsbehle.com