From the full report 2018 of Freedom House. Governments around the world are tightening control over citizens’ data and using claims of “fake news” to suppress dissent, eroding trust in the internet as well as the foundations of democracy.
Where next for the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act?blogzilla
Talk at Open Tech 2015 on legal reform of UK interception and surveillance laws, including a comparison of the Intelligence and Security Committee and David Anderson reports.
We are living in a digital world rife with risks. This has led to a rise in digital crimes, increasing the need for digital forensics in turn.
Find out why you should choose a career in digital forensics: https://lnkd.in/ex2KmZp
My presentation at the IGov2 conference at the University of Oslo, 9 Sept 2014. Gave shorter version at Norwegian Board of Technology hearing on 10 Sept 2014. Related journal article at http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/09/01/ijlit.eau007.abstract
Audio at http://www.jus.uio.no/ifp/english/research/projects/nrccl/internet-governance/events/dag-2-del-2-norrm-mp3.mp3
ILS presentation on principles of fake news regulationmrleiser
A short presentation for the ILS lunch series on how to regulate fake news, focusing on inter-agency cooperation while protecting free expression, ensuring financial and advertising transparency.
Where next for the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act?blogzilla
Talk at Open Tech 2015 on legal reform of UK interception and surveillance laws, including a comparison of the Intelligence and Security Committee and David Anderson reports.
We are living in a digital world rife with risks. This has led to a rise in digital crimes, increasing the need for digital forensics in turn.
Find out why you should choose a career in digital forensics: https://lnkd.in/ex2KmZp
My presentation at the IGov2 conference at the University of Oslo, 9 Sept 2014. Gave shorter version at Norwegian Board of Technology hearing on 10 Sept 2014. Related journal article at http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/09/01/ijlit.eau007.abstract
Audio at http://www.jus.uio.no/ifp/english/research/projects/nrccl/internet-governance/events/dag-2-del-2-norrm-mp3.mp3
ILS presentation on principles of fake news regulationmrleiser
A short presentation for the ILS lunch series on how to regulate fake news, focusing on inter-agency cooperation while protecting free expression, ensuring financial and advertising transparency.
Artificial intelligence governance in the Obama & Trump yearsAdam Thierer
This presentation briefly outlines how AI governance was being formulated in the United States from 2009 to 2020 during the presidencies of Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Although these two administrations differed on most policy matters, they shared a common approach to AI governance. Generally speaking, both administrations adopted a “light-touch” regulatory and industrial policy stance toward AI. Although both administrations highlighted potential areas of policy concern—safety and security issues, in particular—promoting the growth of AI sectors and technologies was prioritized over preemptively restricting them. “Soft law” mechanisms were typically tapped before hard law solutions. In this sense, AI policy in the Obama-Trump AI governance approach has been an extension of the governance vision previous administrations applied to the internet and digital commerce.
2nd ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum: Internet Governance: Trends and Opport...APNIC
APNIC Strategic Engagement Director Pablo Hinojosa explores the key trends seen in Internet governance during the last 20 years at the 2nd ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum, held from 15 to 16 April 2021.
33rd TWNIC IP OPM: Legal cooperation to overcome jurisdictional and territori...APNIC
APNIC General Counsel Craig Ng discusses legal cooperation to overcome jurisdictional and territorial limits in cybercrime investigations at the 33rd TWNIC IP OPM in Taipei, Taiwan, on 5 December 2019.
Forecast and Outlook for big tech, privacy legislation, green tech and climat...Swathi Young
We are all aware that the initial focus of the new presidency under Biden will be economic recovery from the pandemic and all things healthcare: immunizations, drug pricing, coverage reform, health equity, sustainability and industry behavior. However, the new government is also preparing to focus on infrastructure such highways, bridges, roads, public transit, housing, public schools, broadband internet access, 5G , regulation around content moderation of social media platforms, climate change and green tech and COVID-19 stimulus bills.
The Internet has become closely associated with freedom of expression and the global economy. Today, it plays a direct or indirect role in almost every aspect of life. Yet many fear the Internet as we have come to know it is at risk, with restrictions forcing fragmentation along political, corporate, or cultural lines. Despite growing concerns about the future of the Internet, discussion surrounding online freedom remains largely mired in a handful of issues: the necessity and appropriateness of government surveillance in the United States, digital privacy in Europe, and censorship in authoritarian states such as China. However, between them, the United States, Europe, and China account for less than half of the world’s Internet users. For much of the rest of the world, any discussion of Internet freedom falls at the complex intersection of political and social liberties, nation-building, security threats, economic development, and resource constraints.
Asia’s biggest developing democracies - India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Thailand - account for a quarter of the world’s people, but only about one-tenth of the global online population. The policy decisions these states make going forward will be of considerable importance for the future of the Internet and offer some useful lessons about the limitations and vulnerabilities of the global Internet freedom agenda as it is currently being pursued by the United States and Europe.
From a survey of these countries’ experiences, six broad conclusions or principles can be drawn. First, the online world is an outgrowth of the offline world, rather than a distinct phenomenon. Internet policy cannot be considered in a vacuum, or divorced from other relevant aspects of public policy, such as security, economic policy, or governance. Second, laws, norms, and cultural attitudes related to Internet use vary widely, even among democracies. A one-size-fits-all approach to Internet freedom will not work and may even prove counterproductive. Third, online freedoms and greater security are not inherently at odds with one another in open societies. Discourse that presents a false choice between security and freedom is harmful for both, as well as for state legitimacy and economic growth.
Fourth, while much discussion of Internet freedom frames the issue as a conflict between governments, corporations, and civil society, each sector is divided on the merits of unfettered Internet freedom. Fifth, current legislation pertaining to the Internet in many democratic countries is deeply flawed, even in the context of their own constitutional rights pertaining to freedom of expression. By and large, Internet-related legislation is vague, making implementation arbitrary, and undermining public trust in state institutions. And sixth, users are often not adequately informed of the privileges and restrictions associated with Internet use in their native countries. Policies and initiat
Artificial intelligence governance in the Obama & Trump yearsAdam Thierer
This presentation briefly outlines how AI governance was being formulated in the United States from 2009 to 2020 during the presidencies of Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Although these two administrations differed on most policy matters, they shared a common approach to AI governance. Generally speaking, both administrations adopted a “light-touch” regulatory and industrial policy stance toward AI. Although both administrations highlighted potential areas of policy concern—safety and security issues, in particular—promoting the growth of AI sectors and technologies was prioritized over preemptively restricting them. “Soft law” mechanisms were typically tapped before hard law solutions. In this sense, AI policy in the Obama-Trump AI governance approach has been an extension of the governance vision previous administrations applied to the internet and digital commerce.
2nd ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum: Internet Governance: Trends and Opport...APNIC
APNIC Strategic Engagement Director Pablo Hinojosa explores the key trends seen in Internet governance during the last 20 years at the 2nd ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum, held from 15 to 16 April 2021.
33rd TWNIC IP OPM: Legal cooperation to overcome jurisdictional and territori...APNIC
APNIC General Counsel Craig Ng discusses legal cooperation to overcome jurisdictional and territorial limits in cybercrime investigations at the 33rd TWNIC IP OPM in Taipei, Taiwan, on 5 December 2019.
Forecast and Outlook for big tech, privacy legislation, green tech and climat...Swathi Young
We are all aware that the initial focus of the new presidency under Biden will be economic recovery from the pandemic and all things healthcare: immunizations, drug pricing, coverage reform, health equity, sustainability and industry behavior. However, the new government is also preparing to focus on infrastructure such highways, bridges, roads, public transit, housing, public schools, broadband internet access, 5G , regulation around content moderation of social media platforms, climate change and green tech and COVID-19 stimulus bills.
The Internet has become closely associated with freedom of expression and the global economy. Today, it plays a direct or indirect role in almost every aspect of life. Yet many fear the Internet as we have come to know it is at risk, with restrictions forcing fragmentation along political, corporate, or cultural lines. Despite growing concerns about the future of the Internet, discussion surrounding online freedom remains largely mired in a handful of issues: the necessity and appropriateness of government surveillance in the United States, digital privacy in Europe, and censorship in authoritarian states such as China. However, between them, the United States, Europe, and China account for less than half of the world’s Internet users. For much of the rest of the world, any discussion of Internet freedom falls at the complex intersection of political and social liberties, nation-building, security threats, economic development, and resource constraints.
Asia’s biggest developing democracies - India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Thailand - account for a quarter of the world’s people, but only about one-tenth of the global online population. The policy decisions these states make going forward will be of considerable importance for the future of the Internet and offer some useful lessons about the limitations and vulnerabilities of the global Internet freedom agenda as it is currently being pursued by the United States and Europe.
From a survey of these countries’ experiences, six broad conclusions or principles can be drawn. First, the online world is an outgrowth of the offline world, rather than a distinct phenomenon. Internet policy cannot be considered in a vacuum, or divorced from other relevant aspects of public policy, such as security, economic policy, or governance. Second, laws, norms, and cultural attitudes related to Internet use vary widely, even among democracies. A one-size-fits-all approach to Internet freedom will not work and may even prove counterproductive. Third, online freedoms and greater security are not inherently at odds with one another in open societies. Discourse that presents a false choice between security and freedom is harmful for both, as well as for state legitimacy and economic growth.
Fourth, while much discussion of Internet freedom frames the issue as a conflict between governments, corporations, and civil society, each sector is divided on the merits of unfettered Internet freedom. Fifth, current legislation pertaining to the Internet in many democratic countries is deeply flawed, even in the context of their own constitutional rights pertaining to freedom of expression. By and large, Internet-related legislation is vague, making implementation arbitrary, and undermining public trust in state institutions. And sixth, users are often not adequately informed of the privileges and restrictions associated with Internet use in their native countries. Policies and initiat
PRIVACY RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS (2).pdflinda gichohi
This is an article/blog on the Privacy Symposium Africa 2022 on Privacy Rights and Digital rights as Human Rights. It also talks about Online Gender Based Violence , this is gender based violence that manifests in the Digital Space and Online world ie; phishing, non-consensual sharing, harrassment. This article explains why Privacy rights are essential in the modern world.
Presentation by Christian D'Cunha at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Analyzing the influence of information and communication technology on the sc...JohnGacinya
Rwanda‟s Information Communication and Technology (ICT) sector is among the fastest growing ICT sectors in Africa. Mobile phone penetration had risen to 65% and internet spread was above 20% in 2013. ICT is double edged and has had positive and negative effects to the Rwandan society. It is hoped that Information communication technology is likely to reduce unemployment and transform the country into a competitive, knowledge based economy.
Analyzing the influence of Information and communication Technology on the sc...JohnGacinya
The main objective of this study is to analyze the role of
Information Communication technology in facilitating human
trafficking in Rwanda. Specifically,
(1) To analyze the influence of technology in facilitating
human trafficking in Rwanda.
(2) To analyze the extent to which Rwanda has been able to
combat human trafficking using technology.
Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...Oles Kulchytskyy
The symposium was organized by the University of Latvia Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS) on the 10th of December. Latvian researchers and opinion leaders, together with European partners,
presented the latest findings in the disinformation and media literacy field as well as discussed the futur challenges that the digital media landscape presents for scientists, decision-makers as well as every media user.
Legal Risks and Preventive Measures in ChatGPT Applications in Chinaijtsrd
On November 30, 2022, the American artificial intelligence company OpenAI released the large language model ChatGPT. ChatGPT, as an AI language model, is not only capable of interacting with humans but can also write articles, develop strategies, create poetry, and even write code and check for vulnerabilities. However, along with its capabilities, there are also legal risks associated with the application of ChatGPT, making it important for us to research and consider how to properly prevent these risks. The main research focus of this project is on ChatGPTs ethical responsibilities, the relationship and order of human machine coexistence, the protection of individual safety, and the governance of ChatGPT by both the nation and society. Through our research, we aim to maximize the convenience that ChatGPT offers us and effectively mitigate its potential risks. Chen Jiaqi | Zhen Yunuo | Guo Simeng "Legal Risks and Preventive Measures in ChatGPT Applications in China" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-7 | Issue-6 , December 2023, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd60106.pdf Paper Url: https://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/artificial-intelligence/60106/legal-risks-and-preventive-measures-in-chatgpt-applications-in-china/chen-jiaqi
Is artificial intelligence the future tool for anti corruption GlobalTechCouncil
The World Bank report suggests that the amount of goods and services that governments purchase to discharge their official business is a staggering $10 trillion per year – and is estimated at 10 to 25 percent of global GDP. Unless an effective public scrutiny mechanism is not in place, there are high chances of the money being lost to corruption.
Internet Governance & Digital Rights by Waihiga K. Muturi, Rtn..pdfWAIHIGA K.MUTURI
This meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 26th October at 4 pm GMT. Yes, it's only in two days. During this session, we will cover the following topic :
The importance of privacy as culture and how (legal) regulation makes a difference by Eduarda Chacon Rosas (Brazil).
Internet governance and digital rights by Waihiga K. Muturi, Rtn. (Kenya).
Online Apps: Its Regulations and Governance by Antara Jha (India).
Maintaining data integrity through effective regulatory policies by Jonathan Agbo (Nigeria).
I hope you will enjoy those conversations and strongly advise you to mark the date on the calendar.
As a last reminder, here's the link of the event: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZArfuqspz8sHdYTLYvWQcU7GZgCsZrPUSsE
Common Good Digital Framework Action Plan
PURPOSE
The Common Good Digital Framework (CGDF) will serve as a platform to bring
authoritative knowledge and raise awareness about violations of ethical values
and standards by governments and large organizations.
The platform will monitor and alert against the misuse of Artificial Intelligence
(AI), personal data, and neglect of cyber security. The objectives of the
campaign are to stimulate and galvanize civil society towards the need to create
new norms and regulations, and therein influence public and private AI and
cyber policy.
The rapid rise of online political campaigning has made most political financing regulations obsolete, putting transparency and accountability at risk. Seven in 10 countries worldwide do not have any specific limits on online spending on election campaigns, with six out of 10 not having any restrictions on online political advertising at all.
Il 2018 sarà ricordato come l' "anno 0" per la cyber security? Sicuramente, grazie all'entrata in vigore del GDPR e il nuovo framework Enisa, tutti i soggetti - dal privato cittadino, alle organizzazioni Statali passando per le aziende - sono chiamati a fare un "salto quantico" nella cosi detta "Data Economy".
Liberamente interpretato dalla lettura dell'Opinion 250 del WP29 sul GDPR ecco un esempio di come può essere gestito la comunicazione/registro di un Data Breach su Dati Personali.
IPMA YC in collaborazione con RisorsaUOmo e MIP Politecnico di Milano presentano il Business Game dedicato al Project Management applicato a grandi eventi come Expo 2015
Connettività Abilitante: Bluetooth Low Energy e M2M nelle TelcoMauro Marigliano
QUESTO STUDIO COMBINA INFORMAZIONI QUANTITATIVE E QUALITATIVE DEL MERCATO TELCO PER VALUTARE LE OPPORTUNITA' DI ADOZIONE DELLE NUOVE TECNOLOGIE ABILITANTI.
ALLO STATO ATTUALE ESSO COMPRENDE UN ANALISI DEL FENOMENO M2M NEL MONDO ED IN ITALIA, SOFFERMANDOSI SUI POSSIBILI SVILUPPI VERTICALI E SENZA TRALASCIARE LE IMPLICAZIONI REGOLAMENTARI.
QUESTO STUDIO COMBINA INFORMAZIONI QUANTITATIVE E QUALITATIVE DEL MERCATO. ALLO STATO ATTUALE ESSO COMPRENDE UN ANALISI DEL FENOMENO M2M NEL MONDO ED IN ITALIA, SOFFERMANDOSI SUI POSSIBILI SVILUPPI VERTICALI E SENZA TRALASCIARE LE IMPLICAZIONI REGOLAMENTARI.
APNIC Foundation, presented by Ellisha Heppner at the PNG DNS Forum 2024APNIC
Ellisha Heppner, Grant Management Lead, presented an update on APNIC Foundation to the PNG DNS Forum held from 6 to 10 May, 2024 in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Instagram has become one of the most popular social media platforms, allowing people to share photos, videos, and stories with their followers. Sometimes, though, you might want to view someone's story without them knowing.
Gen Z and the marketplaces - let's translate their needsLaura Szabó
The product workshop focused on exploring the requirements of Generation Z in relation to marketplace dynamics. We delved into their specific needs, examined the specifics in their shopping preferences, and analyzed their preferred methods for accessing information and making purchases within a marketplace. Through the study of real-life cases , we tried to gain valuable insights into enhancing the marketplace experience for Generation Z.
The workshop was held on the DMA Conference in Vienna June 2024.
Meet up Milano 14 _ Axpo Italia_ Migration from Mule3 (On-prem) to.pdfFlorence Consulting
Quattordicesimo Meetup di Milano, tenutosi a Milano il 23 Maggio 2024 dalle ore 17:00 alle ore 18:30 in presenza e da remoto.
Abbiamo parlato di come Axpo Italia S.p.A. ha ridotto il technical debt migrando le proprie APIs da Mule 3.9 a Mule 4.4 passando anche da on-premises a CloudHub 1.0.
Bridging the Digital Gap Brad Spiegel Macon, GA Initiative.pptxBrad Spiegel Macon GA
Brad Spiegel Macon GA’s journey exemplifies the profound impact that one individual can have on their community. Through his unwavering dedication to digital inclusion, he’s not only bridging the gap in Macon but also setting an example for others to follow.
Bridging the Digital Gap Brad Spiegel Macon, GA Initiative.pptx
Freedom on the net 2018
1. freedom on the net
2018
the rise of digital authoritarianism
mauro marigliano
2. The internet is growing less free around the
world, and democracy itself is withering under its
influence.
Disinformation and propaganda disseminated
online have poisoned the public sphere.
The unbridled collection of personal data has
broken down traditional notions of privacy. And a
cohort of countries is moving toward digital
authoritarianism by embracing the Chinese
model of extensive censorship and automated
surveillance systems.
As a result of these trends, global internet
freedom declined for the eighth consecutive year
in 2018.
the report.
3.
4.
5. policymakersprivate sector civil society
Adhere to the UN Guiding
Principles on Business and
Human Rights.
Conduct human rights impact
assessments for new markets
and commit to doing no harm.
Grant users control over their
information and ensure that it
is not being misused.
Ensure fair and transparent
content moderation practices.
Engage in continuous dialogue
with local civil society
organizations.
Use internal expertise to help
counter Chinese state
censorship and protect users.
Label automated “bot”
accounts.
Include human rights safeguards in
national strategies on artificial
intelligence (AI).
Enact strong data protection laws to
provide greater transparency and
control over personal data.
Impose sanctions—such as freezing
of assets—on foreign tech companies
involved in human rights abuses.
In the United States, re-introduce
and pass the Global Online Freedom
Act (GOFA).
Ensure that all internet-related laws
and practices adhere to international
human rights law and standards.
Fund rapid response capacity to
counter attacks on internet freedom.
Partner with the private sector
on fact-checking efforts.
Work with scholars to examine
how disinformation spreads and
why people are likely to share
it.
Monitor home countries’
collaboration with Beijing and
Chinese firms.
Continue to raise awareness
about government censorship
and surveillance efforts.
recommendations