FRANCO-GERMAN CONFLICT AT
AIRBUS
EADS 1
M&A Failure Rate is around 50%
Cultural differences are an additional obstacle to sucess in
crossborder M&As
EADS implemented numerous measures to manage cultural
differences
◆ Organization & Structure
◆ Leadership & Teamwork
◆ Training & Careers
EADS 2
Symmetry was the guiding principle
 2 Executive Presidents
 2 divisions run by the French
 2 divisions run by the Germans
 2 sites for the HQ : Paris and Munich
 Respect for balance of nationalities and skills
 Expatriation bonuses
 English the working language
 EADS culture : team spirit
 Creation of multicultural work teams
EADS 3
A340 : sharing of tasks
◆ Aérospatiale : strategy, creativity
 Cockpit
 Wingbox
◆ DASA : cost containment, profit
 Fuselage
 Cabin interior
EADS 4
Multicultural teamwork involves the coexistence of different
concepts of communication and collaboration
◆ Cooperation
◆ Control
◆ Reward
 First, people discover and learn…
 Then, informal national groups emerge
 Finally, deadlocks in collaboration appear
EADS 5
Clash of 2 interpretations of the notion of collaboration
◆ Germany : logic of cooperation
 Teamwork to reach a common goal
 The French guy is seen as an individualist
 The idea of the unpredictability of the French is reinforced
◆ France : logic of competition
 Individual contributions to accomplish a common task
 The French guy feels deprived of his freedom of action
 He is put off by the need to work out a consensus
EADS 6
Origin of the clash : educational systems
◆ Germany
 Working in a group involves strong consensus
 Each member contributes equally to the result
 Motivation comes from within the group
◆ France
 The system emphasizes competition
 Consensus is not a necessary condition for action
 Motivation comes from outside the group
EADS 7
Clash of 2 leadership styles
◆ France
 Centralized power
 Autocratic management style
 Power is paternalistic, emotive, personal
 The boss must be consulted regularly
 He manifests his authority and power
◆ Germany
 Decentralized power
 Democratic management style
 Power based on function and competence
 The boss delegates a lot
EADS 8
Interview with Louis Gallois
• Are we nearing the end of dual control at EADS ?
Dual control created a French faction and a German faction. It slowed down
decisionmaking. But without these concessions EADS would never have
come into existence in 1999. Now we have to gradually move towards a
more normal type of governance. I don ’t have a miracle solution. The only
thing I am certain of is that the future of Airbus and EADS can only be
European.
• Is Power 8 an industrial or a political plan ?
Airbus has a constraint : to respect the balance among four countries, the
founders, France and Germany, joined by the UK and Spain. I think I have
respected that balance without compromising the efficiency of the plan. I
hope national conflicts will not get worse, on the contrary. They are a poison
for Airbus.
March 2007
Franco-German Conflict at Airbus

Franco-German Conflict at Airbus

  • 1.
  • 3.
    EADS 1 M&A FailureRate is around 50% Cultural differences are an additional obstacle to sucess in crossborder M&As EADS implemented numerous measures to manage cultural differences ◆ Organization & Structure ◆ Leadership & Teamwork ◆ Training & Careers
  • 4.
    EADS 2 Symmetry wasthe guiding principle  2 Executive Presidents  2 divisions run by the French  2 divisions run by the Germans  2 sites for the HQ : Paris and Munich  Respect for balance of nationalities and skills  Expatriation bonuses  English the working language  EADS culture : team spirit  Creation of multicultural work teams
  • 5.
    EADS 3 A340 :sharing of tasks ◆ Aérospatiale : strategy, creativity  Cockpit  Wingbox ◆ DASA : cost containment, profit  Fuselage  Cabin interior
  • 6.
    EADS 4 Multicultural teamworkinvolves the coexistence of different concepts of communication and collaboration ◆ Cooperation ◆ Control ◆ Reward  First, people discover and learn…  Then, informal national groups emerge  Finally, deadlocks in collaboration appear
  • 7.
    EADS 5 Clash of2 interpretations of the notion of collaboration ◆ Germany : logic of cooperation  Teamwork to reach a common goal  The French guy is seen as an individualist  The idea of the unpredictability of the French is reinforced ◆ France : logic of competition  Individual contributions to accomplish a common task  The French guy feels deprived of his freedom of action  He is put off by the need to work out a consensus
  • 8.
    EADS 6 Origin ofthe clash : educational systems ◆ Germany  Working in a group involves strong consensus  Each member contributes equally to the result  Motivation comes from within the group ◆ France  The system emphasizes competition  Consensus is not a necessary condition for action  Motivation comes from outside the group
  • 9.
    EADS 7 Clash of2 leadership styles ◆ France  Centralized power  Autocratic management style  Power is paternalistic, emotive, personal  The boss must be consulted regularly  He manifests his authority and power ◆ Germany  Decentralized power  Democratic management style  Power based on function and competence  The boss delegates a lot
  • 10.
    EADS 8 Interview withLouis Gallois • Are we nearing the end of dual control at EADS ? Dual control created a French faction and a German faction. It slowed down decisionmaking. But without these concessions EADS would never have come into existence in 1999. Now we have to gradually move towards a more normal type of governance. I don ’t have a miracle solution. The only thing I am certain of is that the future of Airbus and EADS can only be European. • Is Power 8 an industrial or a political plan ? Airbus has a constraint : to respect the balance among four countries, the founders, France and Germany, joined by the UK and Spain. I think I have respected that balance without compromising the efficiency of the plan. I hope national conflicts will not get worse, on the contrary. They are a poison for Airbus. March 2007