SlideShare a Scribd company logo
• Name: Forest Of Flowers
• Established: 1996
• Original Owners: Wayne Watson
• Wayne Originally initially established “FOF” with 3 primary retail
stores.
• Forest of Flowers is a full service floral retailer
• Located in strategic positions throughout London, Ontario.
• Products Include:
Plants
Freshly Cut Flowers
Customized Floral Arrangements
Most significant portions of revenue came from custom arrangements
for weddings and funerals, etc.
• Forest of Flowers gained and kept
significant numbers of customers
by offering extremely competitive
pricing that other flower retailers
had trouble matching
• Materials are purchased at
significant discounts due to
large quantity orders
• Customers benefit from these
savings
• Through disciplined
management, growth was
controlled and constant,
including growth of sales staff.
• Distribution remained almost
exclusively in the London market
allowing for a deeper market
saturation.
• 2004 Projections:
• Best Case Scenario:
$2,930,368.67
• Worst Case Scenario:
$2,471,390.10
• The Majority of all sales come
with drastic seasonality.
• Examples: Valentines Day,
Mother’s Day, Christmas, etc
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
2001 2002
2003
2004
1.91
2.13 2.15
2.93
Net Sales in Millions BEST CASE
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
2001 2002
2003
2004
1.91
2.13 2.15
2.47
Net Sales in Millions Worst CASE
Complete customer satisfaction,
extremely competitive prices and a
wider variety of international
choices seem to be driving the
sales growth.
Expand distribution area beyond
London
Sizeable Assets Include:
• Inventories
Forest of Flowers eliminated
wholesalers and purchasing
agents and obtains its inventory
from international growers.
Purchases assets in a way that
competitors cannot.
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
2001 2002 2003
3.95 4.10
3.67
7.21
8.14
7.29
Total Asset
Turnover
Fixed Asset
Turnover
• Total Asset Turnover indicates
that Forest of Flowers is not
extremely asset intensive,
however asset efficiency is
declining.
• If this expansion were to be
approved, the T.A.T and F.A.T
ratios would need to show some
significant improvement.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2001 2002 2003
15.48 15.57 18.95
Average Collection Period
• Average Collection Period rose
slightly in 2002 and then rose more
noticeably in 2003.
• This can be explained due to
Accounts Receivable increasing
quicker than Net Sales.
• Inventory levels climbing higher
than Sales growth caused a
slight increase to INV. Days in
2002.
• The company maintained their
significant quantity discounts in
2003 decreasing COGS.
40
45
50
55
2001
2002
2003
43.9
50.05 51.01
Inventory Days
• Operations expenses have increased
slightly over the years showing that
Mr. Watsons $80,000 reinvestments
were certainly needed to avoid
unnecessary financing.
• However, T.A.T and F.A.T show that
the company is utilizing its assets
fairly well, though these ratios could
stand to see some improvement if the
expansion is approved.
• Customer credit policies need to be
tightened marginally to decrease ACP
days and bring in uncollected funds
for the company.
CFO 2002 2003
Net income 71,453 61,640
Depreciation 24,480 35,015
Accounts receivable 9,684 20,657
Inventory 28,203 7,388
Prepaid Expenses 15,243 (4,056)
Accounts Payable (27,523) 5,843
Taxes 10,687 (24,900)
Deferred Tax 1,948 10,459
Total 27,915 64,068
CFI
Gross Fixed Assets 21,091 68,070
Total (21,091) (68,070)
CFF
Deposits (7,515) -
Line of Credit 7,707 (21,716)
Current Portion of Long Term Debt (5,348) 3,522
Bank Loans (30,407) 9,546
Due to Shareholders 6,967 21,600
Total (13,566) 12,952
Grand Total (6,742) 8,950
Cash Change (6,742) 8,949
Liquidity 2001 2002 2003
Current Ratio 1.262972 1.731071 2.696526
Quick Ratio 0.69 0.90 1.48
Accounts Payable
Days 23.67 8.46 10.53
Current ratio 1.262972 1.731071 2.696526
2001 2002 2003
The current ratio more than doubled between 2001 and 2003.
Examining both the Current Assets and Current Liabilities
growth rate, between 2001 and 2002 the current assets grew
more than current liabilities declined but between 2002 and
2003 current liabilities declined more than current assets grew.
Growth rates 24.06% 13.77%
-9.48% -26.96%
A/P Days 23.67 8.46 10.53
-58.53% 29.96%Growth rates
2001 2002 2003
Accounts payable had a significant
decrease from 2001 to 2002
Debt/Equity 1.53 0.98 0.80
TIE 5.988618 6.957103 4.285158
GPM 62.05% 60.44% 59.06%
OPM 4.76% 4.23% 3.59%
NPM 3.70% 3.36% 2.87%
ROE 37.09% 27.24% 19.03%
ROE 37.09% 27.24% 19.03%
Return on equity had a
significant decrease due to the
increase of shareholders wealth.
37.44% 23.50%Growth rates
Expected or Best Case
• A 3% increase in sales from
existing stores and $720,000 in
revenues from new stores
• COGS to decrease to 38% of
sales by gaining a seat on the
OFG
Worst Case
 A 10% decrease in sales from
existing stores and $540,000 in
revenues from new stores
 Not able to gain a seat on the
OFG resulting in COGS to be 41%
of sales
 $3000 increase in Rent for each new store
 New Administration Costs of $3,600
 $1320 increase in Insurance expense
 Interest charge is $23,760
 $180,000 increase in new GFA and Term Loans
 Current Portion of LTD would be $43,200
2003
Net Sales $2,145,989
Gross Profit $1,267,398
Income before tax $77,000
Net Income $61,640
Net sales $ 2,930,368.67
Cost of goods sold $ 1,113,540.09
Gross profit $ 1,816,828.58
Operating expenses
Administration Cost $ 3,600.00
Advertising & promotion $ 126,418.88
Automotive $ 20,182.23
Bad debts $ 5,735.14
Bank charges & interest $ 23,760.00
Credit card discounts $ 36,942.50
Depreciation $ 47,015.00
Delivery $ 138,326.13
Insurance $ 4,746.00
Legal & accounting $ 4,678.24
Office expenses $ 6,174.83
Repairs & maintenance $ 4,556.71
Rent $ 159,014.00
Store supplies $ 129,373.85
Telephone $ 24,125.82
Travel & entertainment $ 21,768.95
Utilities $ 26,668.40
Wages & benefits $ 794,472.63
Total operating expenses $ 1,577,559.31
Income before tax $ 239,269.26
Income taxes $ 47,729.56
Net income $ 191,539.71
2003
 Total Assets $584,581
 Retained Earnings $239,922
Cash $ 145,346.85
Accounts receivable $ 152,105.48
Inventory $ 155,633.59
Prepaid expenses $ 32,127.71
Total current assets $ 485,213.63
Gross fixed assets $ 452,432.00
Leasehold Improvements $ 180,000.00
Less: accumulated depreciation $ 204,907.00
Net fixed assets $ 427,525.00
Deposits $ 19,461.40
Organization cost $ 4,039.00
Total assets $ 936,239.03
Operating line of credit $ -
Accounts payable $ 32,120.12
Taxes payable $ 39,478.25
Current portion LTD $ 43,200.00
Total current liabilities $ 114,798.37
Term bank loans $ 166,374.00
Due to shareholders $ 104,347.00
Deferred income tax $ 35,221.96
Total long term liabilities $ 305,942.96
Share capital $ 84,036.00
Retained earnings $ 431,461.71
Total shareholders' equity $ 515,497.71
Total liabilities & equity $ 936,239.03
2.696
1.48
10.53
3.671
7.286
18.95
51.01
59.06%
3.59%
2.87%
19.03%
0.80
4.285
2.87%
3.671
1.804
19.03%
2003
2004(P)
2003
 Net Sales $2,145,989
 Gross Profit $1,267,398
 Income before tax $77,000
 Net Income $61,640
Net sales $ 2,471,390.10
Cost of goods sold $ 1,011,813.71
Gross profit $ 1,459,576.39
Operating expenses
Administration Cost $ 3,600.00
Advertising & promotion $ 106,618.11
Automotive $ 6,968.63
Bad debts $ 2,856.59
Bank charges & interest $ 23,760.00
Credit card discounts $ 31,156.26
Depreciation $ 47,015.00
Delivery $ 116,660.35
Insurance $ 4,746.00
Legal & accounting $ 3,945.49
Office expenses $ 5,207.68
Repairs & maintenance $ 3,843.00
Rent $ 159,014.00
Store supplies $ 109,110.24
Telephone $ 20,347.04
Travel & entertainment $ 18,359.32
Utilities $ 22,491.38
Wages & benefits $ 670,035.75
Total operating expenses $ 1,355,734.85
Income before tax $ 103,841.54
Income taxes $ 20,714.36
Net income $ 83,127.18
2003
Total Assets $584,581
Retained Earnings $239,922
Cash $ 65,373.73
Accounts receivable $ 128,281.47
Inventory $ 141,415.83
Prepaid expenses $ 27,095.60
Total current assets $ 362,166.63
Gross fixed assets $ 452,432.00
Leasehold Improvements $ 180,000.00
Less: accumulated depreciation $ 204,907.00
Net fixed assets $ 427,525.00
Deposits $ 19,461.40
Organization cost $ 4,039.00
Total assets $ 813,192.03
Operating line of credit $ -
Accounts payable $ 29,185.82
Taxes payable $ 33,294.84
Current portion LTD $ 43,200.00
Total current liabilities $ 105,680.66
Term bank loans $ 166,374.00
Due to shareholders $ 104,347.00
Deferred income tax $ 29,705.20
Total long term liabilities $ 300,426.20
Share capital $ 84,036.00
Retained earnings $ 323,049.18
Total shareholders' equity $ 407,085.18
Total liabilities & equity $ 813,192.03
2.696
1.48
10.53
3.671
7.2859
18.95
51.01
59.06%
3.59%
2.87%
19.03%
0.80
4.285158
2.87%
3.671
1.804
19.03%
Liquidity
Current 3.427
Quick 2.09
A/P Days same
Efficiency
TAT 3.039
FAT 5.781
ACP same
Inv Days same
Profitability
GPM 59.06%
OPM 4.20%
NPM 3.36%
ROE 20.42%
Leverage
D/E 1.00
TIE 4.370
Dupont
NPM 3.36%
TAT 3.039
Leverage 1.998
Total 20.42%
2003
2004 (P)
Best Case
• Net Sales increase by 36.6%
• Net Income increases by 210.7%
• Total Assets Increase by 60.2%
Worst Case
• Net Sales increase by 15.16%
• Net Income increases by 34.9%
• Total Assets Increase by 39.1%
Forrest of Flowers final

More Related Content

What's hot

Natureview farm case analysis
Natureview farm case analysis Natureview farm case analysis
Natureview farm case analysis
harichandana kolagani
 
Mountain man brewing company
Mountain man brewing companyMountain man brewing company
Mountain man brewing company
Sameer Mathur
 
Harvard Business Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Harvard Business Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing CompanyHarvard Business Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Harvard Business Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Sankalp Agarwal
 
Natureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case StudyNatureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case Study
Rajat Nagar
 
Natureview case analysis
Natureview case analysisNatureview case analysis
Natureview case analysis
Abhay Upadhyay
 
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farmHarvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Manu Tyagi
 
Mountain Man Brewing Company
Mountain Man Brewing CompanyMountain Man Brewing Company
Mountain Man Brewing Company
Rajit Bhattacharya
 
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to LightMountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
Roshan Mishra
 
Natureview Farm
Natureview FarmNatureview Farm
Natureview Farm
Jenny (Jinfeng) Jiao
 
Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing CompanyCase Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Tushar Rathor
 
Optical Distortion, Inc
Optical Distortion, IncOptical Distortion, Inc
Optical Distortion, Inc
ulugbek55
 
Mountain man brewing company: Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain man brewing company: Bringing the Brand to LightMountain man brewing company: Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain man brewing company: Bringing the Brand to Light
Ramit Khurana
 
Exploring Brand-Person Relationships-Three Life histories
Exploring Brand-Person  Relationships-Three Life historiesExploring Brand-Person  Relationships-Three Life histories
Exploring Brand-Person Relationships-Three Life histories
Amrita Sarkhel
 
Natureview Farm Case
Natureview Farm CaseNatureview Farm Case
Natureview Farm Case
SWAPNIL GOYAL
 
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case AnalysisMountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis
Shashank Srivastava
 
Mountain Man Brewing Company
Mountain Man Brewing CompanyMountain Man Brewing Company
Mountain Man Brewing Company
Shreyansi Rohatgi
 
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
Culinarian Cookware case study analysisCulinarian Cookware case study analysis
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
Saurabh Mhase
 
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case StudyThe Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
Sara Jacob
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farmNatureview farm
Natureview farm
Rutvi Choksi
 
Finance project Mountain man
Finance project  Mountain manFinance project  Mountain man
Finance project Mountain man
Noor
 

What's hot (20)

Natureview farm case analysis
Natureview farm case analysis Natureview farm case analysis
Natureview farm case analysis
 
Mountain man brewing company
Mountain man brewing companyMountain man brewing company
Mountain man brewing company
 
Harvard Business Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Harvard Business Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing CompanyHarvard Business Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Harvard Business Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
 
Natureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case StudyNatureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case Study
 
Natureview case analysis
Natureview case analysisNatureview case analysis
Natureview case analysis
 
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farmHarvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farm
 
Mountain Man Brewing Company
Mountain Man Brewing CompanyMountain Man Brewing Company
Mountain Man Brewing Company
 
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to LightMountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
 
Natureview Farm
Natureview FarmNatureview Farm
Natureview Farm
 
Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing CompanyCase Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
Case Study on Mountain Man Brewing Company
 
Optical Distortion, Inc
Optical Distortion, IncOptical Distortion, Inc
Optical Distortion, Inc
 
Mountain man brewing company: Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain man brewing company: Bringing the Brand to LightMountain man brewing company: Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain man brewing company: Bringing the Brand to Light
 
Exploring Brand-Person Relationships-Three Life histories
Exploring Brand-Person  Relationships-Three Life historiesExploring Brand-Person  Relationships-Three Life histories
Exploring Brand-Person Relationships-Three Life histories
 
Natureview Farm Case
Natureview Farm CaseNatureview Farm Case
Natureview Farm Case
 
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case AnalysisMountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis
 
Mountain Man Brewing Company
Mountain Man Brewing CompanyMountain Man Brewing Company
Mountain Man Brewing Company
 
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
Culinarian Cookware case study analysisCulinarian Cookware case study analysis
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
 
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case StudyThe Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farmNatureview farm
Natureview farm
 
Finance project Mountain man
Finance project  Mountain manFinance project  Mountain man
Finance project Mountain man
 

Similar to Forrest of Flowers final

MARKETING
MARKETINGMARKETING
MARKETING
raza-ali
 
Bootstrapping Entrepeneurs & Their Business Ppt
Bootstrapping Entrepeneurs & Their Business PptBootstrapping Entrepeneurs & Their Business Ppt
Bootstrapping Entrepeneurs & Their Business Ppt
Caroline Cummings
 
FiBAN's business angel training "Effective Business Angel Investing Strategie...
FiBAN's business angel training "Effective Business Angel Investing Strategie...FiBAN's business angel training "Effective Business Angel Investing Strategie...
FiBAN's business angel training "Effective Business Angel Investing Strategie...
FiBAN
 
P&g presentation
P&g presentationP&g presentation
P&g presentation
Elisa Reyes
 
Procter and Gamble Financial Report
Procter and Gamble Financial ReportProcter and Gamble Financial Report
Procter and Gamble Financial Report
Elisa Reyes
 
Discover 4Q16 Earnings
Discover 4Q16 EarningsDiscover 4Q16 Earnings
Discover 4Q16 Earnings
investorrelationsdiscover
 
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis ReportFinancial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Nicholas Espinosa
 
Financial Analysis 2.pptx
Financial Analysis 2.pptxFinancial Analysis 2.pptx
Financial Analysis 2.pptx
NadeemSRimawi
 
Quanta Services Investor Deck Aug/Sept 2019
Quanta Services Investor Deck Aug/Sept 2019Quanta Services Investor Deck Aug/Sept 2019
Quanta Services Investor Deck Aug/Sept 2019
QuantaIR
 
Wassim Zhani Kroger Value.pdf
Wassim Zhani Kroger Value.pdfWassim Zhani Kroger Value.pdf
Wassim Zhani Kroger Value.pdf
Wassim Zhani
 
The Finance Perspective: The Business Model for the Subscription Economy
The Finance Perspective: The Business Model for the Subscription EconomyThe Finance Perspective: The Business Model for the Subscription Economy
The Finance Perspective: The Business Model for the Subscription Economy
Zuora, Inc.
 
1 Front Page 2 Memo TO.docx
1  Front Page 2  Memo TO.docx1  Front Page 2  Memo TO.docx
1 Front Page 2 Memo TO.docx
karisariddell
 
Quanta Services Investor Deck Nov/Dec 2019
Quanta Services Investor Deck Nov/Dec 2019Quanta Services Investor Deck Nov/Dec 2019
Quanta Services Investor Deck Nov/Dec 2019
QuantaIR
 
GMED
GMEDGMED
Value based management of Union pacific corp and UPS
Value based management of Union pacific corp and UPSValue based management of Union pacific corp and UPS
Value based management of Union pacific corp and UPS
SayedSadullahSadat
 
CAT_Equity Research
CAT_Equity ResearchCAT_Equity Research
CAT_Equity Research
Cisco Martinez
 
The Metrics That Matter - Zuora Subscribed 2017
The Metrics That Matter - Zuora Subscribed 2017The Metrics That Matter - Zuora Subscribed 2017
The Metrics That Matter - Zuora Subscribed 2017
Matthew Tribe
 
Subscribed Sydney & Melbourne 2017: The Metrics that Really Matter
Subscribed Sydney & Melbourne 2017: The Metrics that Really MatterSubscribed Sydney & Melbourne 2017: The Metrics that Really Matter
Subscribed Sydney & Melbourne 2017: The Metrics that Really Matter
Zuora, Inc.
 
Why Knowing Profitability Is the Key to Success at Your Institution
Why Knowing Profitability Is the Key to Success at Your InstitutionWhy Knowing Profitability Is the Key to Success at Your Institution
Why Knowing Profitability Is the Key to Success at Your Institution
Baker Hill
 
Fourth Quarter 2015
Fourth Quarter 2015 Fourth Quarter 2015
Fourth Quarter 2015
investorrelationsdiscover
 

Similar to Forrest of Flowers final (20)

MARKETING
MARKETINGMARKETING
MARKETING
 
Bootstrapping Entrepeneurs & Their Business Ppt
Bootstrapping Entrepeneurs & Their Business PptBootstrapping Entrepeneurs & Their Business Ppt
Bootstrapping Entrepeneurs & Their Business Ppt
 
FiBAN's business angel training "Effective Business Angel Investing Strategie...
FiBAN's business angel training "Effective Business Angel Investing Strategie...FiBAN's business angel training "Effective Business Angel Investing Strategie...
FiBAN's business angel training "Effective Business Angel Investing Strategie...
 
P&g presentation
P&g presentationP&g presentation
P&g presentation
 
Procter and Gamble Financial Report
Procter and Gamble Financial ReportProcter and Gamble Financial Report
Procter and Gamble Financial Report
 
Discover 4Q16 Earnings
Discover 4Q16 EarningsDiscover 4Q16 Earnings
Discover 4Q16 Earnings
 
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis ReportFinancial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
 
Financial Analysis 2.pptx
Financial Analysis 2.pptxFinancial Analysis 2.pptx
Financial Analysis 2.pptx
 
Quanta Services Investor Deck Aug/Sept 2019
Quanta Services Investor Deck Aug/Sept 2019Quanta Services Investor Deck Aug/Sept 2019
Quanta Services Investor Deck Aug/Sept 2019
 
Wassim Zhani Kroger Value.pdf
Wassim Zhani Kroger Value.pdfWassim Zhani Kroger Value.pdf
Wassim Zhani Kroger Value.pdf
 
The Finance Perspective: The Business Model for the Subscription Economy
The Finance Perspective: The Business Model for the Subscription EconomyThe Finance Perspective: The Business Model for the Subscription Economy
The Finance Perspective: The Business Model for the Subscription Economy
 
1 Front Page 2 Memo TO.docx
1  Front Page 2  Memo TO.docx1  Front Page 2  Memo TO.docx
1 Front Page 2 Memo TO.docx
 
Quanta Services Investor Deck Nov/Dec 2019
Quanta Services Investor Deck Nov/Dec 2019Quanta Services Investor Deck Nov/Dec 2019
Quanta Services Investor Deck Nov/Dec 2019
 
GMED
GMEDGMED
GMED
 
Value based management of Union pacific corp and UPS
Value based management of Union pacific corp and UPSValue based management of Union pacific corp and UPS
Value based management of Union pacific corp and UPS
 
CAT_Equity Research
CAT_Equity ResearchCAT_Equity Research
CAT_Equity Research
 
The Metrics That Matter - Zuora Subscribed 2017
The Metrics That Matter - Zuora Subscribed 2017The Metrics That Matter - Zuora Subscribed 2017
The Metrics That Matter - Zuora Subscribed 2017
 
Subscribed Sydney & Melbourne 2017: The Metrics that Really Matter
Subscribed Sydney & Melbourne 2017: The Metrics that Really MatterSubscribed Sydney & Melbourne 2017: The Metrics that Really Matter
Subscribed Sydney & Melbourne 2017: The Metrics that Really Matter
 
Why Knowing Profitability Is the Key to Success at Your Institution
Why Knowing Profitability Is the Key to Success at Your InstitutionWhy Knowing Profitability Is the Key to Success at Your Institution
Why Knowing Profitability Is the Key to Success at Your Institution
 
Fourth Quarter 2015
Fourth Quarter 2015 Fourth Quarter 2015
Fourth Quarter 2015
 

Forrest of Flowers final

  • 1.
  • 2. • Name: Forest Of Flowers • Established: 1996 • Original Owners: Wayne Watson • Wayne Originally initially established “FOF” with 3 primary retail stores.
  • 3. • Forest of Flowers is a full service floral retailer • Located in strategic positions throughout London, Ontario.
  • 4. • Products Include: Plants Freshly Cut Flowers Customized Floral Arrangements Most significant portions of revenue came from custom arrangements for weddings and funerals, etc.
  • 5. • Forest of Flowers gained and kept significant numbers of customers by offering extremely competitive pricing that other flower retailers had trouble matching • Materials are purchased at significant discounts due to large quantity orders • Customers benefit from these savings
  • 6. • Through disciplined management, growth was controlled and constant, including growth of sales staff. • Distribution remained almost exclusively in the London market allowing for a deeper market saturation.
  • 7. • 2004 Projections: • Best Case Scenario: $2,930,368.67 • Worst Case Scenario: $2,471,390.10 • The Majority of all sales come with drastic seasonality. • Examples: Valentines Day, Mother’s Day, Christmas, etc
  • 8. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 2001 2002 2003 2004 1.91 2.13 2.15 2.93 Net Sales in Millions BEST CASE 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 2001 2002 2003 2004 1.91 2.13 2.15 2.47 Net Sales in Millions Worst CASE
  • 9. Complete customer satisfaction, extremely competitive prices and a wider variety of international choices seem to be driving the sales growth. Expand distribution area beyond London
  • 10. Sizeable Assets Include: • Inventories Forest of Flowers eliminated wholesalers and purchasing agents and obtains its inventory from international growers. Purchases assets in a way that competitors cannot.
  • 11. 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 2001 2002 2003 3.95 4.10 3.67 7.21 8.14 7.29 Total Asset Turnover Fixed Asset Turnover
  • 12. • Total Asset Turnover indicates that Forest of Flowers is not extremely asset intensive, however asset efficiency is declining. • If this expansion were to be approved, the T.A.T and F.A.T ratios would need to show some significant improvement.
  • 13. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2001 2002 2003 15.48 15.57 18.95 Average Collection Period • Average Collection Period rose slightly in 2002 and then rose more noticeably in 2003. • This can be explained due to Accounts Receivable increasing quicker than Net Sales.
  • 14. • Inventory levels climbing higher than Sales growth caused a slight increase to INV. Days in 2002. • The company maintained their significant quantity discounts in 2003 decreasing COGS. 40 45 50 55 2001 2002 2003 43.9 50.05 51.01 Inventory Days
  • 15. • Operations expenses have increased slightly over the years showing that Mr. Watsons $80,000 reinvestments were certainly needed to avoid unnecessary financing. • However, T.A.T and F.A.T show that the company is utilizing its assets fairly well, though these ratios could stand to see some improvement if the expansion is approved. • Customer credit policies need to be tightened marginally to decrease ACP days and bring in uncollected funds for the company.
  • 16.
  • 17. CFO 2002 2003 Net income 71,453 61,640 Depreciation 24,480 35,015 Accounts receivable 9,684 20,657 Inventory 28,203 7,388 Prepaid Expenses 15,243 (4,056) Accounts Payable (27,523) 5,843 Taxes 10,687 (24,900) Deferred Tax 1,948 10,459 Total 27,915 64,068 CFI Gross Fixed Assets 21,091 68,070 Total (21,091) (68,070) CFF Deposits (7,515) - Line of Credit 7,707 (21,716) Current Portion of Long Term Debt (5,348) 3,522 Bank Loans (30,407) 9,546 Due to Shareholders 6,967 21,600 Total (13,566) 12,952 Grand Total (6,742) 8,950 Cash Change (6,742) 8,949
  • 18. Liquidity 2001 2002 2003 Current Ratio 1.262972 1.731071 2.696526 Quick Ratio 0.69 0.90 1.48 Accounts Payable Days 23.67 8.46 10.53
  • 19. Current ratio 1.262972 1.731071 2.696526 2001 2002 2003 The current ratio more than doubled between 2001 and 2003. Examining both the Current Assets and Current Liabilities growth rate, between 2001 and 2002 the current assets grew more than current liabilities declined but between 2002 and 2003 current liabilities declined more than current assets grew. Growth rates 24.06% 13.77% -9.48% -26.96%
  • 20. A/P Days 23.67 8.46 10.53 -58.53% 29.96%Growth rates 2001 2002 2003 Accounts payable had a significant decrease from 2001 to 2002
  • 21. Debt/Equity 1.53 0.98 0.80 TIE 5.988618 6.957103 4.285158
  • 22. GPM 62.05% 60.44% 59.06% OPM 4.76% 4.23% 3.59% NPM 3.70% 3.36% 2.87% ROE 37.09% 27.24% 19.03%
  • 23. ROE 37.09% 27.24% 19.03% Return on equity had a significant decrease due to the increase of shareholders wealth. 37.44% 23.50%Growth rates
  • 24.
  • 25. Expected or Best Case • A 3% increase in sales from existing stores and $720,000 in revenues from new stores • COGS to decrease to 38% of sales by gaining a seat on the OFG Worst Case  A 10% decrease in sales from existing stores and $540,000 in revenues from new stores  Not able to gain a seat on the OFG resulting in COGS to be 41% of sales
  • 26.  $3000 increase in Rent for each new store  New Administration Costs of $3,600  $1320 increase in Insurance expense  Interest charge is $23,760  $180,000 increase in new GFA and Term Loans  Current Portion of LTD would be $43,200
  • 27. 2003 Net Sales $2,145,989 Gross Profit $1,267,398 Income before tax $77,000 Net Income $61,640 Net sales $ 2,930,368.67 Cost of goods sold $ 1,113,540.09 Gross profit $ 1,816,828.58 Operating expenses Administration Cost $ 3,600.00 Advertising & promotion $ 126,418.88 Automotive $ 20,182.23 Bad debts $ 5,735.14 Bank charges & interest $ 23,760.00 Credit card discounts $ 36,942.50 Depreciation $ 47,015.00 Delivery $ 138,326.13 Insurance $ 4,746.00 Legal & accounting $ 4,678.24 Office expenses $ 6,174.83 Repairs & maintenance $ 4,556.71 Rent $ 159,014.00 Store supplies $ 129,373.85 Telephone $ 24,125.82 Travel & entertainment $ 21,768.95 Utilities $ 26,668.40 Wages & benefits $ 794,472.63 Total operating expenses $ 1,577,559.31 Income before tax $ 239,269.26 Income taxes $ 47,729.56 Net income $ 191,539.71
  • 28. 2003  Total Assets $584,581  Retained Earnings $239,922 Cash $ 145,346.85 Accounts receivable $ 152,105.48 Inventory $ 155,633.59 Prepaid expenses $ 32,127.71 Total current assets $ 485,213.63 Gross fixed assets $ 452,432.00 Leasehold Improvements $ 180,000.00 Less: accumulated depreciation $ 204,907.00 Net fixed assets $ 427,525.00 Deposits $ 19,461.40 Organization cost $ 4,039.00 Total assets $ 936,239.03 Operating line of credit $ - Accounts payable $ 32,120.12 Taxes payable $ 39,478.25 Current portion LTD $ 43,200.00 Total current liabilities $ 114,798.37 Term bank loans $ 166,374.00 Due to shareholders $ 104,347.00 Deferred income tax $ 35,221.96 Total long term liabilities $ 305,942.96 Share capital $ 84,036.00 Retained earnings $ 431,461.71 Total shareholders' equity $ 515,497.71 Total liabilities & equity $ 936,239.03
  • 30. 2003  Net Sales $2,145,989  Gross Profit $1,267,398  Income before tax $77,000  Net Income $61,640 Net sales $ 2,471,390.10 Cost of goods sold $ 1,011,813.71 Gross profit $ 1,459,576.39 Operating expenses Administration Cost $ 3,600.00 Advertising & promotion $ 106,618.11 Automotive $ 6,968.63 Bad debts $ 2,856.59 Bank charges & interest $ 23,760.00 Credit card discounts $ 31,156.26 Depreciation $ 47,015.00 Delivery $ 116,660.35 Insurance $ 4,746.00 Legal & accounting $ 3,945.49 Office expenses $ 5,207.68 Repairs & maintenance $ 3,843.00 Rent $ 159,014.00 Store supplies $ 109,110.24 Telephone $ 20,347.04 Travel & entertainment $ 18,359.32 Utilities $ 22,491.38 Wages & benefits $ 670,035.75 Total operating expenses $ 1,355,734.85 Income before tax $ 103,841.54 Income taxes $ 20,714.36 Net income $ 83,127.18
  • 31. 2003 Total Assets $584,581 Retained Earnings $239,922 Cash $ 65,373.73 Accounts receivable $ 128,281.47 Inventory $ 141,415.83 Prepaid expenses $ 27,095.60 Total current assets $ 362,166.63 Gross fixed assets $ 452,432.00 Leasehold Improvements $ 180,000.00 Less: accumulated depreciation $ 204,907.00 Net fixed assets $ 427,525.00 Deposits $ 19,461.40 Organization cost $ 4,039.00 Total assets $ 813,192.03 Operating line of credit $ - Accounts payable $ 29,185.82 Taxes payable $ 33,294.84 Current portion LTD $ 43,200.00 Total current liabilities $ 105,680.66 Term bank loans $ 166,374.00 Due to shareholders $ 104,347.00 Deferred income tax $ 29,705.20 Total long term liabilities $ 300,426.20 Share capital $ 84,036.00 Retained earnings $ 323,049.18 Total shareholders' equity $ 407,085.18 Total liabilities & equity $ 813,192.03
  • 32. 2.696 1.48 10.53 3.671 7.2859 18.95 51.01 59.06% 3.59% 2.87% 19.03% 0.80 4.285158 2.87% 3.671 1.804 19.03% Liquidity Current 3.427 Quick 2.09 A/P Days same Efficiency TAT 3.039 FAT 5.781 ACP same Inv Days same Profitability GPM 59.06% OPM 4.20% NPM 3.36% ROE 20.42% Leverage D/E 1.00 TIE 4.370 Dupont NPM 3.36% TAT 3.039 Leverage 1.998 Total 20.42% 2003 2004 (P)
  • 33. Best Case • Net Sales increase by 36.6% • Net Income increases by 210.7% • Total Assets Increase by 60.2% Worst Case • Net Sales increase by 15.16% • Net Income increases by 34.9% • Total Assets Increase by 39.1%