Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is defined as the legal punishment of death for criminal offenses. Methods of capital punishment vary around the world but generally include hanging, electrocution, lethal injection, and firing squad. In the United States, the most common methods are lethal injection and electrocution. Supporters argue that capital punishment deters serious crimes, ensures criminals who are executed cannot commit further crimes, and provides a sense of justice or closure for victims' families. However, others argue that capital punishment violates religious or ethical beliefs in the sanctity of life, risks executing innocent people due to human error, and does not effectively deter crime according to evidence. The essay will examine both sides of the debate and the

1. Essay on Capital Punishment
Capital Punishment
The definition of capital punishment is the legal punishment of death for violating criminal law. The
person who gets capital punishment is the ones who committed serious crimes. Methods of capital
punishment throughout the world are by stoning, beheading, hanging, electrocution, lethal injection
and shooting. The two most common methods capital punishment use in the United States are lethal
injection and electrocution.
The lethal injection is the most used form of capital punishment. It's an intravenous shot that kills the
criminal quick and painless. When capital punishment is done by electrocution the criminal is
strapped to a chair that a volts of electricity is pass through.
In America if all people agree...show more content...
The first pros of capital punishment are that it works as deterrence against major crimes. The death
penalty is a punishment that creates fear in the mind of any sane person. Most criminals would think
twice if they knew their own lives were at stake. Although there is no statistical evidence that death
penalty deters crime, we have to agree that most of us fear death.
The most conclusive evidence that criminals fear the death penalty more than life without parole is
provided by convicted capital murderers and their attorneys. 99.9% of all convicted capital murderers
and their attorneys argue for life, not death, in the punishment phase of their trial. (prodeathpenalty)
A Second pro is that a criminal that is executed can't another crime or escape. A dead criminal can
no longer commit a crime, and therefore the danger to the public is permanently removed.
A third pro of capital punishment is that it's more economical. Why should money be spent on a
criminal when it could be spent on education, the sick, or the needy? The only reason why it is so
expensive to execute an individual, is because of the numerous appeal processes. (~ab2166)
Another pro is that the retribution to the family and loves ones of the victims is payed. Endless
stress and anxiety plague the families of the victims and executions puts all those stresses to rest
better than life–long imprisonment or
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Capital Punishment Essay example
Capital Punishment
"Let's keep society safe and give murderers what they deserve – the death penalty".
In this essay I will hope to set out both sides of the argument, for and against Capital Punishment.
The advantages and the disadvantages will be considered in conjunction with Christian teachings
and belief. The Christian teachings, Old Testament and New Testament will also be compared with
human reactions to the subject. From my research and analysis in this essay I will be able to come
to a conclusion as to whether or not I feel the death penalty is ever justified
Murder is a crime whether you look at the Bible – Thou shalt not kill The Sixth Commandment – or
at a book of English...show more content...
The disadvantages of Capital Punishment are shown most prominently in Jesus and what he stood
for, i.e. forgiveness and sanctity of life, also in the Sermon on the Mount and many other parts of
the New Testament. This does give the argument against capital punishment a head start but there
are also other factors to consider. By letting a murderer be put to death you will be legalising
murder for the executioner. Who is then to say who can and cannot kill? If a government decides
this, there is sure to be religious opposition, and if for example the Pope decides who can kill
another then he would be going against his own religion. When death is made legal in any way,
even in cases of war, it is encouraging violence. War should and is frequently only a last resort
'Just War'. The death penalty for murder would not be a last resort as there are alternatives and as
again who is to decide which murder and in what circumstances it would warrant another death. In
any case and in any trial mistakes could be made. There will always be the risk that an innocent
person will be put to death because of another's mistake. According to Christian beliefs no one
should be killed especially because God, the creator, is the only one who can give and take life, this
is called the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net