The document discusses five traditional proofs for the existence of God put forth by Thomas Aquinas. The five proofs are the argument from motion, causation, contingency, goodness, and design. Each proof argues that some aspect of the natural world, such as motion or causality, requires an uncreated first cause or prime mover, which is God.
This document discusses several key points about electricity and gravity:
1) Objects can become positively or negatively charged, and opposite charges attract each other. Gravity is a force that pulls smaller objects towards bigger objects.
2) When asked to explain the cause of gravity, Newton said he had no hypothesis, and gravity is only explained based on observation, not mathematical proof.
3) Gravity is seen as holding the universe together, and studying God's creation can help declare his glory, as referenced in several Bible verses. The document encourages changing one's view of studies and time.
When humans become aware of God, they understand love and law as coming from a single divine source rather than just through their own senses. This divine source is described as being one, from which the entire universe extends in a balanced and rhythmic way through the interchange of opposing forces, in order to simulate reality for sensing beings. The key law underpinning all of creation is balance and balanced interchange, as seen in phenomena from star formation to insect breathing. Comprehension of this fundamental principle of balance would give one insight into both the visible and invisible workings of the universe.
1) The document discusses the concept of 'nothing' and argues that nothing does not truly exist. Instead, everything exists dependently and conditionally without any permanent essence.
2) It states that energy has always existed and is the driving force behind all change and activity in the universe. Energy exists as vibration that generates the cycles of rising and falling phenomena.
3) The document concludes that without consciousness or mind, no duality or multiplicity would exist. In a state without mind, all things would be in a completely neutralized state of no-thingness without qualities, names, or attributes.
Lady Anne Conway and René Descartes had differing views on God, the soul, and the body. Conway believed that God is the pure substance that created all things visible and invisible with a desire for good existing outside of time. She viewed the soul and body as one substance that works together, with the soul able to feel bodily pain. Descartes viewed God as the supremely perfect substance that is certain and cannot be broken down. He believed that the mind and body are two completely different substances that do not need each other to exist, with the body, not the soul, feeling pain. Overall, Conway saw a harmonious connection between God, soul, and body, while Descartes saw God and the mind-body interaction as two separate
1. The document discusses how opposites like good and evil, beauty and ugliness, are combined in the world.
2. It argues that opposites are necessary for relative truths to be established and for things to have degrees and diversity.
3. The combining of opposites is seen as a manifestation of God's wisdom and power in creating a world of trial and examination that separates people based on their spiritual development.
This document summarizes Thomas Aquinas' third way argument for the existence of God. It explains that everything in the world is contingent and dependent on outside factors, and these factors are also contingent, requiring an ultimate necessary being (God) that depends on nothing outside itself. The document also discusses how Gottfried Leibniz and J.L. Mackie expanded on the cosmological argument using the principle of sufficient reason and an analogy about a train needing an engine.
The document discusses several arguments for the existence of God, including cosmological and ontological arguments. It outlines Thomas Aquinas' five ways of proving God, including from motion, cause, contingency, perfection, and design. It also discusses the Kalam cosmological argument and Gottfried Leibniz's argument that even if the universe is eternal, it still requires an external reason or cause. However, it notes that these arguments are inductive and only conclude that God's existence is probable rather than proven absolutely, and discusses various objections to the arguments.
The document discusses ontological arguments for the existence of God presented by philosophers like Anselm and Descartes. It outlines Anselm's argument that God must exist by definition as the greatest being conceivable. It also discusses Descartes' version of the ontological argument and Kant's criticisms of attempting to deduce existence from concepts alone. The document analyzes the types of reasoning and arguments used in ontological arguments.
This document discusses several key points about electricity and gravity:
1) Objects can become positively or negatively charged, and opposite charges attract each other. Gravity is a force that pulls smaller objects towards bigger objects.
2) When asked to explain the cause of gravity, Newton said he had no hypothesis, and gravity is only explained based on observation, not mathematical proof.
3) Gravity is seen as holding the universe together, and studying God's creation can help declare his glory, as referenced in several Bible verses. The document encourages changing one's view of studies and time.
When humans become aware of God, they understand love and law as coming from a single divine source rather than just through their own senses. This divine source is described as being one, from which the entire universe extends in a balanced and rhythmic way through the interchange of opposing forces, in order to simulate reality for sensing beings. The key law underpinning all of creation is balance and balanced interchange, as seen in phenomena from star formation to insect breathing. Comprehension of this fundamental principle of balance would give one insight into both the visible and invisible workings of the universe.
1) The document discusses the concept of 'nothing' and argues that nothing does not truly exist. Instead, everything exists dependently and conditionally without any permanent essence.
2) It states that energy has always existed and is the driving force behind all change and activity in the universe. Energy exists as vibration that generates the cycles of rising and falling phenomena.
3) The document concludes that without consciousness or mind, no duality or multiplicity would exist. In a state without mind, all things would be in a completely neutralized state of no-thingness without qualities, names, or attributes.
Lady Anne Conway and René Descartes had differing views on God, the soul, and the body. Conway believed that God is the pure substance that created all things visible and invisible with a desire for good existing outside of time. She viewed the soul and body as one substance that works together, with the soul able to feel bodily pain. Descartes viewed God as the supremely perfect substance that is certain and cannot be broken down. He believed that the mind and body are two completely different substances that do not need each other to exist, with the body, not the soul, feeling pain. Overall, Conway saw a harmonious connection between God, soul, and body, while Descartes saw God and the mind-body interaction as two separate
1. The document discusses how opposites like good and evil, beauty and ugliness, are combined in the world.
2. It argues that opposites are necessary for relative truths to be established and for things to have degrees and diversity.
3. The combining of opposites is seen as a manifestation of God's wisdom and power in creating a world of trial and examination that separates people based on their spiritual development.
This document summarizes Thomas Aquinas' third way argument for the existence of God. It explains that everything in the world is contingent and dependent on outside factors, and these factors are also contingent, requiring an ultimate necessary being (God) that depends on nothing outside itself. The document also discusses how Gottfried Leibniz and J.L. Mackie expanded on the cosmological argument using the principle of sufficient reason and an analogy about a train needing an engine.
The document discusses several arguments for the existence of God, including cosmological and ontological arguments. It outlines Thomas Aquinas' five ways of proving God, including from motion, cause, contingency, perfection, and design. It also discusses the Kalam cosmological argument and Gottfried Leibniz's argument that even if the universe is eternal, it still requires an external reason or cause. However, it notes that these arguments are inductive and only conclude that God's existence is probable rather than proven absolutely, and discusses various objections to the arguments.
The document discusses ontological arguments for the existence of God presented by philosophers like Anselm and Descartes. It outlines Anselm's argument that God must exist by definition as the greatest being conceivable. It also discusses Descartes' version of the ontological argument and Kant's criticisms of attempting to deduce existence from concepts alone. The document analyzes the types of reasoning and arguments used in ontological arguments.
This document discusses the nature of truth and how to seek the ultimate truth. It argues that truth arises from within oneself rather than existing externally. It states that all phenomena are dependent on the observer's perception and are considered "conventionally true" but not ultimately true. It suggests abandoning rigid views and ideologies in order to see the truth directly. All things exist within and are constituents of the supreme state of emptiness or Mother Nature. Emptiness is the inherent nature of all phenomena and the key to understanding their dependent arising and eternal continuum. Ultimately, one can become enlightened to the true nature of all things by properly understanding causality and conditions.
The document discusses arguments for and against the existence of God from a rational perspective. It argues that everything in the universe is finite and limited, so something unlimited must have created all finite things. While science can explain processes within the universe, it cannot prove or disprove why the universe exists in the first place or what created it, as these questions are beyond its scope. The document also notes that characterizing God with human attributes is an imperfect attempt to understand the divine. In the end, it poses the question of whether God is a myth or a rational concept as still open to debate.
The document discusses arguments for and against the existence of God from a rational perspective. It argues that everything in the universe is finite and limited, so something unlimited must have created all finite things. While science can explain processes within the universe, it cannot prove or disprove why the universe exists in the first place or what created it, as these questions are beyond its scope. The document also notes that characterizing God with human attributes is limiting and different cultures have envisioned God in various anthropomorphic ways. It concludes by posing that the existence of God remains an open question.
This document provides an overview of natural theology and its key arguments for God's existence, including the cosmological and teleological arguments. It discusses the cosmological argument, which reasons that the universe must have been caused by something outside of space and time since it could not cause itself. It also examines the teleological argument, which points to apparent order, purpose, and design in the universe as evidence for an intelligent creator. The document outlines Thomas Aquinas' five ways of proving God and discusses theistic evolution as a response to challenges to natural theology from Darwin's theory of evolution.
The document discusses ways that people can come to know God through creation and through themselves. It presents five arguments or "proofs" for God's existence put forth by St. Thomas Aquinas: 1) the argument from motion, which argues everything that moves is moved by something else until reaching a first unmoved mover, God; 2) the argument from efficient cause, which argues that an infinite regress of causes is impossible so there must be a first cause, God; 3) the argument from possibility and necessity, which argues that contingent beings require a necessary being as a ground, God; 4) the argument from gradation, which argues that if goodness exists in degrees then there must be a maximally good being, God
This document contains an essay discussing the relationship between God and science. It explores whether God is necessary for the existence of the world and whether the world is necessary in itself. The essay raises philosophical questions about how to determine if something is a necessary being that exists in all possible worlds. It examines arguments that have been made for God's necessity, such as ontological arguments, and critiques them for being tautological or begging the question. The document considers different perspectives on necessity and possibility in an attempt to rigorously analyze claims about God's nature and relationship to the world.
When we say; “God does everything”; it does not mean that God actually plans and brings about earth quakes, tsunamis; or invents scientific inventions; or engages in the multitude of mundane activities, which are ‘done’ by peripheral instruments of God!
All this is actually a matter of study and continuous practice of NAMASMARAN and firsthand experiences at least in glimpses initially; and finally actually “being”! It is not a matter of blind belief! Actually all this “writing” and “we” are contingent amidst the eternal kingdom and supreme reign of God; our guru.
The document provides rational arguments for the existence of God as the creator. It argues that everything in the universe is finite and limited, needing sustenance to exist, so must have been created by something unlimited. It also argues that scientific methods cannot prove or disprove God's existence, as God is not physical or testable. The document concludes that through rational thought, the only solution is that an infinite, eternal creator brought the dependent, finite universe into being.
This document explores various nontraditional conceptions of God, including God as Mother, Jesus as Mestizo, God as an Eternal Thou, God as the Ground of Being, God as a Verb or process, God as the embodiment of creativity in Process Thought, and the Akan view of God as a Cosmic Architect and paradoxical Bagworm.
This document explores various nontraditional conceptions of God, including God as Mother, Jesus as Mestizo, God as an Eternal Thou, God as the Ground of Being, God as a Verb or process, God as the embodiment of creativity in Process Thought, and the Akan view of God as a Cosmic Architect and paradoxical Bagworm.
This document summarizes four traditional philosophical arguments for the existence of God from Aristotle and Aquinas known as the Five Ways. It discusses how one can come to know God through observation of the natural world and human experience. The four arguments covered are the argument from motion, efficient cause, possibility and necessity, and gradation. Each argues that the complexities and order observed require an unmoved mover, a first cause, a necessary being, or a most perfect being (God) to explain them. The document also references how humans have an innate openness and capacity to know God through reason and faith.
This document discusses different perspectives on the idea of God. It examines what God means, including definitions from Augustine of God as perfect intellect and will. It explores puzzles about divine attributes like omnipotence. Anselm's ontological argument for God's existence is presented and critiqued. The origins of the concept of God are debated, including whether the idea is innate, derived from experience, or a human invention to explain the world. Freudian and sociological views analyze religion's psychological and social functions but not God's actual existence.
This document summarizes the beliefs of Muslims regarding the existence and qualities of Allah. It begins by stating that Allah alone exists through His own essence, while all other things came into existence through His will and power. It then refutes the claims of atheists who believe the universe came into existence through matter and motion alone without a creator. It provides several analogies, such as a beautifully written book or watch, to show why one must conclude an intelligent designer is needed rather than random natural causes. It affirms that while we cannot see Allah directly, this does not negate His existence, just as one cannot see the mind or soul. The document aims to prove through reason and logic that Allah is the eternal, all-power
How do I Know Whether God exists? Philosophy EssayIsmakhalid1
The document discusses arguments for the existence of God from a philosophical perspective. It examines the teleological, ontological, and cosmological arguments put forth by thinkers like Paley, Anselm, and Aquinas. While each argument provides a logical case, they also have limitations and do not prove God's existence with certainty. The author believes logic and phenomena like the origin of the universe, life, and encoded information in DNA point to an intelligent creator. As a Muslim, the author finds the religious conception of an all-powerful, all-knowing, omnipresent, and absolute God who exists outside of time and space to be consistent with this logical perspective.
This document discusses arguments for and against the existence of God. It begins by outlining how most people in the world believe in a supernatural being called God. It then discusses how God's existence cannot be proven through the senses like a physical object. Some argue that only empirical knowledge is possible for humans, gained through the senses, but the document counters that there may be forms of existence beyond human perception. Several analogies and examples are provided to argue that order, design and complexity in nature point to an intelligent creator. The document also shares stories where Islamic scholars provide logical arguments and examples to prove God's existence to skeptics.
St. Ann Philosophy, Proofs of GodNov. 16, 2018.pptThaddeusKozinski
Thomas Aquinas provides five proofs for the existence of God through reason alone. The five proofs are: 1) The argument from motion, which argues that all change requires an initial mover which is God. 2) The argument from efficient cause, which argues that all effects must have a cause and there must be a first cause which is God. 3) The argument from possibility, which argues that all contingent beings must have a necessary being as their source, which is God. 4) The argument from gradation, which argues that all qualities must have a maximum standard, which is God. 5) The argument from design, which argues that purposeful order requires an intelligent designer, which is God.
This document provides a copyright notice and summary of the book "Message of Godhead" by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. It discusses how transcendentalists are concerned with understanding the Absolute Truth beyond the material world. It argues that leaders should not only focus on material betterment but should teach people about God and religion, as understanding the relationship between living entities and God is essential to rehabilitating humanity. The Absolute Truth can only be revealed through transcendental knowledge from authorities, not through mundane philosophical speculation.
This document discusses several arguments that are used to support or reject the existence of God. It examines religious experiences, the design and causation arguments, responses to the Big Bang theory and problems of evil and suffering as reasons some people believe or do not believe in God. Key terms related to arguments about God's existence and attributes are also defined.
A375 Example Taste the taste of the Lord, the taste of the Lord The taste of...franktsao4
It seems that current missionary work requires spending a lot of money, preparing a lot of materials, and traveling to far away places, so that it feels like missionary work. But what was the result they brought back? It's just a lot of photos of activities, fun eating, drinking and some playing games. And then we have to do the same thing next year, never ending. The church once mentioned that a certain missionary would go to the field where she used to work before the end of his life. It seemed that if she had not gone, no one would be willing to go. The reason why these missionary work is so difficult is that no one obeys God’s words, and the Bible is not the main content during missionary work, because in the eyes of those who do not obey God’s words, the Bible is just words and cannot be connected with life, so Reading out God's words is boring because it doesn't have any life experience, so it cannot be connected with human life. I will give a few examples in the hope that this situation can be changed. A375
This document discusses the nature of truth and how to seek the ultimate truth. It argues that truth arises from within oneself rather than existing externally. It states that all phenomena are dependent on the observer's perception and are considered "conventionally true" but not ultimately true. It suggests abandoning rigid views and ideologies in order to see the truth directly. All things exist within and are constituents of the supreme state of emptiness or Mother Nature. Emptiness is the inherent nature of all phenomena and the key to understanding their dependent arising and eternal continuum. Ultimately, one can become enlightened to the true nature of all things by properly understanding causality and conditions.
The document discusses arguments for and against the existence of God from a rational perspective. It argues that everything in the universe is finite and limited, so something unlimited must have created all finite things. While science can explain processes within the universe, it cannot prove or disprove why the universe exists in the first place or what created it, as these questions are beyond its scope. The document also notes that characterizing God with human attributes is an imperfect attempt to understand the divine. In the end, it poses the question of whether God is a myth or a rational concept as still open to debate.
The document discusses arguments for and against the existence of God from a rational perspective. It argues that everything in the universe is finite and limited, so something unlimited must have created all finite things. While science can explain processes within the universe, it cannot prove or disprove why the universe exists in the first place or what created it, as these questions are beyond its scope. The document also notes that characterizing God with human attributes is limiting and different cultures have envisioned God in various anthropomorphic ways. It concludes by posing that the existence of God remains an open question.
This document provides an overview of natural theology and its key arguments for God's existence, including the cosmological and teleological arguments. It discusses the cosmological argument, which reasons that the universe must have been caused by something outside of space and time since it could not cause itself. It also examines the teleological argument, which points to apparent order, purpose, and design in the universe as evidence for an intelligent creator. The document outlines Thomas Aquinas' five ways of proving God and discusses theistic evolution as a response to challenges to natural theology from Darwin's theory of evolution.
The document discusses ways that people can come to know God through creation and through themselves. It presents five arguments or "proofs" for God's existence put forth by St. Thomas Aquinas: 1) the argument from motion, which argues everything that moves is moved by something else until reaching a first unmoved mover, God; 2) the argument from efficient cause, which argues that an infinite regress of causes is impossible so there must be a first cause, God; 3) the argument from possibility and necessity, which argues that contingent beings require a necessary being as a ground, God; 4) the argument from gradation, which argues that if goodness exists in degrees then there must be a maximally good being, God
This document contains an essay discussing the relationship between God and science. It explores whether God is necessary for the existence of the world and whether the world is necessary in itself. The essay raises philosophical questions about how to determine if something is a necessary being that exists in all possible worlds. It examines arguments that have been made for God's necessity, such as ontological arguments, and critiques them for being tautological or begging the question. The document considers different perspectives on necessity and possibility in an attempt to rigorously analyze claims about God's nature and relationship to the world.
When we say; “God does everything”; it does not mean that God actually plans and brings about earth quakes, tsunamis; or invents scientific inventions; or engages in the multitude of mundane activities, which are ‘done’ by peripheral instruments of God!
All this is actually a matter of study and continuous practice of NAMASMARAN and firsthand experiences at least in glimpses initially; and finally actually “being”! It is not a matter of blind belief! Actually all this “writing” and “we” are contingent amidst the eternal kingdom and supreme reign of God; our guru.
The document provides rational arguments for the existence of God as the creator. It argues that everything in the universe is finite and limited, needing sustenance to exist, so must have been created by something unlimited. It also argues that scientific methods cannot prove or disprove God's existence, as God is not physical or testable. The document concludes that through rational thought, the only solution is that an infinite, eternal creator brought the dependent, finite universe into being.
This document explores various nontraditional conceptions of God, including God as Mother, Jesus as Mestizo, God as an Eternal Thou, God as the Ground of Being, God as a Verb or process, God as the embodiment of creativity in Process Thought, and the Akan view of God as a Cosmic Architect and paradoxical Bagworm.
This document explores various nontraditional conceptions of God, including God as Mother, Jesus as Mestizo, God as an Eternal Thou, God as the Ground of Being, God as a Verb or process, God as the embodiment of creativity in Process Thought, and the Akan view of God as a Cosmic Architect and paradoxical Bagworm.
This document summarizes four traditional philosophical arguments for the existence of God from Aristotle and Aquinas known as the Five Ways. It discusses how one can come to know God through observation of the natural world and human experience. The four arguments covered are the argument from motion, efficient cause, possibility and necessity, and gradation. Each argues that the complexities and order observed require an unmoved mover, a first cause, a necessary being, or a most perfect being (God) to explain them. The document also references how humans have an innate openness and capacity to know God through reason and faith.
This document discusses different perspectives on the idea of God. It examines what God means, including definitions from Augustine of God as perfect intellect and will. It explores puzzles about divine attributes like omnipotence. Anselm's ontological argument for God's existence is presented and critiqued. The origins of the concept of God are debated, including whether the idea is innate, derived from experience, or a human invention to explain the world. Freudian and sociological views analyze religion's psychological and social functions but not God's actual existence.
This document summarizes the beliefs of Muslims regarding the existence and qualities of Allah. It begins by stating that Allah alone exists through His own essence, while all other things came into existence through His will and power. It then refutes the claims of atheists who believe the universe came into existence through matter and motion alone without a creator. It provides several analogies, such as a beautifully written book or watch, to show why one must conclude an intelligent designer is needed rather than random natural causes. It affirms that while we cannot see Allah directly, this does not negate His existence, just as one cannot see the mind or soul. The document aims to prove through reason and logic that Allah is the eternal, all-power
How do I Know Whether God exists? Philosophy EssayIsmakhalid1
The document discusses arguments for the existence of God from a philosophical perspective. It examines the teleological, ontological, and cosmological arguments put forth by thinkers like Paley, Anselm, and Aquinas. While each argument provides a logical case, they also have limitations and do not prove God's existence with certainty. The author believes logic and phenomena like the origin of the universe, life, and encoded information in DNA point to an intelligent creator. As a Muslim, the author finds the religious conception of an all-powerful, all-knowing, omnipresent, and absolute God who exists outside of time and space to be consistent with this logical perspective.
This document discusses arguments for and against the existence of God. It begins by outlining how most people in the world believe in a supernatural being called God. It then discusses how God's existence cannot be proven through the senses like a physical object. Some argue that only empirical knowledge is possible for humans, gained through the senses, but the document counters that there may be forms of existence beyond human perception. Several analogies and examples are provided to argue that order, design and complexity in nature point to an intelligent creator. The document also shares stories where Islamic scholars provide logical arguments and examples to prove God's existence to skeptics.
St. Ann Philosophy, Proofs of GodNov. 16, 2018.pptThaddeusKozinski
Thomas Aquinas provides five proofs for the existence of God through reason alone. The five proofs are: 1) The argument from motion, which argues that all change requires an initial mover which is God. 2) The argument from efficient cause, which argues that all effects must have a cause and there must be a first cause which is God. 3) The argument from possibility, which argues that all contingent beings must have a necessary being as their source, which is God. 4) The argument from gradation, which argues that all qualities must have a maximum standard, which is God. 5) The argument from design, which argues that purposeful order requires an intelligent designer, which is God.
This document provides a copyright notice and summary of the book "Message of Godhead" by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. It discusses how transcendentalists are concerned with understanding the Absolute Truth beyond the material world. It argues that leaders should not only focus on material betterment but should teach people about God and religion, as understanding the relationship between living entities and God is essential to rehabilitating humanity. The Absolute Truth can only be revealed through transcendental knowledge from authorities, not through mundane philosophical speculation.
This document discusses several arguments that are used to support or reject the existence of God. It examines religious experiences, the design and causation arguments, responses to the Big Bang theory and problems of evil and suffering as reasons some people believe or do not believe in God. Key terms related to arguments about God's existence and attributes are also defined.
A375 Example Taste the taste of the Lord, the taste of the Lord The taste of...franktsao4
It seems that current missionary work requires spending a lot of money, preparing a lot of materials, and traveling to far away places, so that it feels like missionary work. But what was the result they brought back? It's just a lot of photos of activities, fun eating, drinking and some playing games. And then we have to do the same thing next year, never ending. The church once mentioned that a certain missionary would go to the field where she used to work before the end of his life. It seemed that if she had not gone, no one would be willing to go. The reason why these missionary work is so difficult is that no one obeys God’s words, and the Bible is not the main content during missionary work, because in the eyes of those who do not obey God’s words, the Bible is just words and cannot be connected with life, so Reading out God's words is boring because it doesn't have any life experience, so it cannot be connected with human life. I will give a few examples in the hope that this situation can be changed. A375
The Hope of Salvation - Jude 1:24-25 - MessageCole Hartman
Jude gives us hope at the end of a dark letter. In a dark world like today, we need the light of Christ to shine brighter and brighter. Jude shows us where to fix our focus so we can be filled with God's goodness and glory. Join us to explore this incredible passage.
The Enchantment and Shadows_ Unveiling the Mysteries of Magic and Black Magic...Phoenix O
This manual will guide you through basic skills and tasks to help you get started with various aspects of Magic. Each section is designed to be easy to follow, with step-by-step instructions.
A Free eBook ~ Valuable LIFE Lessons to Learn ( 5 Sets of Presentations)...OH TEIK BIN
A free eBook comprising 5 sets of PowerPoint presentations of meaningful stories /Inspirational pieces that teach important Dhamma/Life lessons. For reflection and practice to develop the mind to grow in love, compassion and wisdom. The texts are in English and Chinese.
My other free eBooks can be obtained from the following Links:
https://www.slideshare.net/ohteikbin/presentations
https://www.slideshare.net/ohteikbin/documents
Why is this So? ~ Do Seek to KNOW (English & Chinese).pptxOH TEIK BIN
A PowerPoint Presentation based on the Dhamma teaching of Kamma-Vipaka (Intentional Actions-Ripening Effects).
A Presentation for developing morality, concentration and wisdom and to spur us to practice the Dhamma diligently.
The texts are in English and Chinese.
The forces involved in this witchcraft spell will re-establish the loving bond between you and help to build a strong, loving relationship from which to start anew. Despite any previous hardships or problems, the spell work will re-establish the strong bonds of friendship and love upon which the marriage and relationship originated. Have faith, these stop divorce and stop separation spells are extremely powerful and will reconnect you and your partner in a strong and harmonious relationship.
My ritual will not only stop separation and divorce, but rebuild a strong bond between you and your partner that is based on truth, honesty, and unconditional love. For an even stronger effect, you may want to consider using the Eternal Love Bond spell to ensure your relationship and love will last through all tests of time. If you have not yet determined if your partner is considering separation or divorce, but are aware of rifts in the relationship, try the Love Spells to remove problems in a relationship or marriage. Keep in mind that all my love spells are 100% customized and that you'll only need 1 spell to address all problems/wishes.
Save your marriage from divorce & make your relationship stronger using anti divorce spells to make him or her fall back in love with you. End your marriage if you are no longer in love with your husband or wife. Permanently end your marriage using divorce spells that work fast. Protect your marriage from divorce using love spells to boost commitment, love & bind your hearts together for a stronger marriage that will last. Get your ex lover who has remarried using divorce spells to break up a couple & make your ex lost lover come back to you permanently.
Visit https://www.profbalaj.com/love-spells-loves-spells-that-work/
Call/WhatsApp +27836633417 for more info.
How to Stop a Divorce and Save Your Marriage: Divorce Spells That Really Work...
Fiveways
1. proofs of God’s existence
By: Sanjay Belani, Czarina Dalmacio, Eeda Duques
2. known as
Doctor Angelicus and Doctor Universalis
Family‘s against to become a monk,
he joined the Dominican Order
His two masterpieces,
the Summa theologiae
and the Summa contra
gentiles
canonized July 18, 1323
feast day January 28
3. These proofs assumes the existence of a God who is
uncreated and independent of the world
and the universe, and their respective processes.
means that God is not reliant on the world
and the universe, for God's existence.
the world and the universe are reliant
on God for theirs
4. st way
“Motion”
action or process of moving or of
changing place or position.
Nothing can be moved from a state of potentiality to actuality,
except by something in a state of actuality.
Therefore, whatever is moved must be moved by another.
But this cannot go on to infinity,
because then there would be no first mover,
6. If everything that is moved is caused by another
mover then there has to be a first mover and
that first mover is :
GOD
7. nd way
“Causation”
there is an order of efficient causes
nothing is found to be the efficient
cause of itself
to take away the cause
is to take away the effect
8. The notion of cause and effect simply
means that you cannot have the
latter(effect) without having the former
(cause).
It is not possible to go on to an infinity
cause and effects, therefore there had
to be a first cause and the first cause
was
GOD.
9. rd way
“Contingency”
taken from possibility and necessity
Since things are found to be generated, and to be corrupted, and
consequently, it is possible for them to be and not to be.
Therefore, if everything If nothing exists, it
can not-be, then at one would have been
time there was nothing in
existence. impossible for
anything to have
begun to exist – till
today.
10. th way
“Goodness”
more and less are predicated of different things according as
they resemble in their different ways
Now the maximum in any genus is the
cause of all in that genus
Therefore, there must also be something which is to
cause of their being,
all beings the
goodness, and every other perfection; and this
we call God
11. th way
“Design”
taken from the governance of the world
whatever lacks knowledge cannot move
towards an end
unless it be directed by some intelligent being
some being endowed exists by whom all
with knowledge and natural things are
intelligence directed to their end;
and this being we call
God. (Aquinas)
Editor's Notes
Saint Thomas Aquinas was born circa 1224 in Roccasecca, Kingdom of Sicily. Defying his family's wishes for him to become a monk, he joined the Dominican Order while attending the University of Naples. His studies introduced him to the teachings of Aristotle, which greatly influenced his controversial work and ideas. He is now considered one of the Roman Catholic Church's foremost theologians.CONTENTS(born 1224/25, Roccasecca, near Aquino, Terra diLavoro, Kingdom of Sicily—died March 7, 1274, Fossanova, near Terracina, Latium, Papal States; canonized July 18, 1323; feast day January 28, formerly March 7) Italian Dominican theologian, the foremost medieval Scholasticist. He developed his own conclusions from Aristotelian premises, notably in the metaphysics of personality, creation, and Providence. As a theologian he was responsible in his two masterpieces, the Summa theologiae and theSumma contra gentiles, for the classical systematization of Latin theology; and as a poet he wrote some of the most gravely beautiful eucharistic hymns in the church's liturgy. His doctrinal system and the explanations and developments made by his followers are known as Thomism. Although many modern Roman Catholic theologians do not find St. Thomas altogether congenial, he is nevertheless recognized by the Roman Catholic Church as its foremost Western philosopher and theologian.Source: http://www.biography.com/people/st-thomas-aquinas-9187231
Note:It should be noted that for each of his 'proofs' Aquinas assumes the existence of a God who is uncreated and independent of the world and the universe, and their respective processes. This means that God is not reliant on the world and the universe, for God's existence. However, the world and the universe are reliant on God for theirs. In other words, without God nothing would be here.
Definition of motion:mo·tion[moh-shuhn] noun1.the action or process of moving or of changing place or position; movement.It is certain, and evident to our sense, that in the world some things are in motion. Now whatever is moved is moved by another, for nothing can be moved except it is in potentiality to that towards which it is moved; whereas a thing moves inasmuch as it is in act. For motion is nothing else than the reduction of something from potentiality to actuality. But nothing can be moved from a state of potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality... it is therefore impossible that in the same respect and in the same way a thing should be both mover and moved i.e. that it should move itself. Therefore, whatever is moved must be moved by another. If that by which it is moved must itself be moved, then this also needs to be moved by another, and that by another again. But this cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no first mover, and consequently, no other mover, seeing as subsequent movers move only inasmuch as they are moved by the first mover; as the staff moves only because it is moved by the hand. Therefore it is necessary to arrive at the first mover, moved by no other; and this everyone understands to be God. (Aquinas)Source:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/motionhttp://www.thatreligiousstudieswebsite.com/Religious_Studies/Phil_of_Rel/God/five_ways.php
The second way is from the nature of efficient cause. In the world of sensible things we find there is an order of efficient causes. There is no case known (neither is it, indeed possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself; for so it would be prior to itself, which is impossible. Now in efficient causes it is not possible to go on to infinity, because in all efficient causes following in order, the first is the cause of the intermediate cause, whether the intermediate cause be several, or one only.Now to take away the cause is to take away the effect. Therefore, if there be no first cause among efficient causes, there will be no ultimate, or intermediate, cause. But if in efficient causes it is possible to go on to infinity, there will be no first efficient cause, neither will there be an ultimate effect, nor any intermediate efficient causes; all of which is plainly false. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.(Aquinas)Now to take away the cause is to take away the effect. Therefore, if there be no first cause among efficient causes, there will be no ultimate, or intermediate, cause. But if in efficient causes it is possible to go on to infinity, there will be no first efficient cause, neither will there be an ultimate effect, nor any intermediate efficient causes; all of which is plainly false. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.http://www.thatreligiousstudieswebsite.com/Religious_Studies/Phil_of_Rel/God/five_ways.php
The third way: The way of CONTINGENCYThe third way is taken from possibility and necessity, and runs thus. We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, since they are found to be generated, and to be corrupted, and consequently, it is possible for them to be and not to be. But it is impossible for these always to exist, for that which can not-be at some time is not. Therefore, if everything can not-be, then at one time there was nothing in existence. Now if this were true, even now there would be nothing in existence, because that which does not exist begins to exist only through something already existing. Therefore, if at one time nothing was in existence, it would have been impossible for anything to have begun to exist; and thus even now nothing would be in existence - which is absurd. Therefore, not all beings are merely possible, but there must exist something the existence of which is necessary. But every necessary thing either has its necessity caused by another, or not. Now it is impossible to go on to infinity in necessary things which have their necessity caused by another, as has already been proved in regard to efficient causes. Therefore, we cannot but admit the existence of some being having of itself its own necessity, and not receiving it from another, but rather causing in others their necessity. This all men speak of as God. (Aquinas)
The fourth way: The way of GOODNESSThe fourth way is taken from the gradation to be found in things. Among beings there are some more and some less good, true, noble, and the like. But more and less are predicated of different things according as they resemble in their different ways something which is the maximum, as a thing is said to be hotter according as it more nearly resembles that which is hottest; so that there is something which is truest, something best, something noblest, and, consequently, something which is most being, for those things that are greatest in truth are greatest in being... Now the maximum in any genus is the cause of all in that genus, as fire, which is the maximum of heat, is the cause of all hot things, as is said in the same book. Therefore, there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God. (Aquinas)
The fifth way: The way of DESIGN (or teleology)The fifth way is taken from the governance of the world. We see that things which lack knowledge, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result. Hence it is plain that they achieve their end, not fortuitously, but designedly. Now whatever lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is directed by the archer. Therefore, some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God. (Aquinas)