Final Assessment Informative paper [150 Points]PoorFair.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
Final Assessment: Informative paper [150 Points] Poor Fair Adequate Good Content Summary Explanation of the issue was missing major points. Poorly organized paper. Vague. No concrete depth of topic. No introduction and/or Conclusion (0-20 points) Presented either U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare government programs. Did not completely discuss successes and failures of each. Organization lacking. Does not adequately focus on the major topic. Did not use sources to support ideas.No clear introduction and/or conclusion (21-40 Points) Presented both U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare government programs and discussed successes and failures of each. Adequately organized. Paper adequately remains focused on topic. Original writing occurs most of the time. Took a position on the issue. Used sources to support ideas. Introduction/conclusion (41-60 Points) Presented both U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare government programs and discussed successes and failures of each. Well organized paper. Supported arguments or ideas with sources. Original writing Introduction/Conclusion (61-65 Points) Reasoning Knowledge No understanding of topic. Novice thinking is evident. Unable to fluently convey major theory in writing. No clear introduction. Poor topic presentation. No significant research to support information presented. (0-20 Points) Basic understanding of topic. Vague introduction.Inconsistent writing most of the time.Less than adequate knowledge of topic and unable to fluently convey major theory in writing.Some statements made without credible research.Unclear what specifically the paper is addressing. Some evidence of basic knowledge. (21-40 Points) Adequate mastery of topic. Adequate knowledge of topic and able to fluently convey major theory in writing most of the time. Adequately addresses relevant aspects of topic. (41-60 Points Mastery of topic is evident. Good knowledge of topic and able to fluently convey major theory in writing. Completely addresses relevant aspects of topic. (61-65 Points) Composition APA Did not follow directions. More than 10 spelling, grammar or basic composition errors. Unable to follow information. APA not used; or a valid attempt was made but there were more than 10 APA errors. Effort reflects little understanding of APA. Did not Follow assignment directions. (0-9 points) Follow directions but 6-10 spelling, grammar, or basic composition errors Information difficult to follow but manageable. APA formatted; documented citations and references; 6-10 errors Limited research to support information presented. Followed a few assignment directions. (10-14 points) Follow directions but 1-5 spelling, grammar, or basic composition errors Able to adequately follow written Information. APA formatted; documented citations and references; 1-5 errors. Adequate research to support information presented. Followed MOST assignment directions. (15-19 points) Followed directions. No composition errors. All informati ...
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Final Assessment: Informative paper [150 Points]
Poor
Fair
Adequate
Good
Content Summary
Explanation of the issue was missing major points.
Poorly organized paper. Vague. No concrete depth of topic. No
introduction and/or Conclusion
(0-20 points)
Presented either U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare
government programs. Did not completely discuss successes and
failures of each.
Organization lacking.
Does not adequately focus on the major topic. Did not use
sources to support ideas.No clear introduction and/or
conclusion (21-40 Points)
Presented both U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare
government programs and discussed successes and failures of
each.
Adequately organized. Paper adequately remains focused on
topic. Original writing occurs most of the time.
Took a position on the issue. Used sources to support ideas.
Introduction/conclusion (41-60 Points)
Presented both U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare
government programs and discussed successes and failures of
each.
Well organized paper. Supported arguments or ideas with
sources. Original writing Introduction/Conclusion
(61-65 Points)
Reasoning Knowledge
No understanding of topic.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/finalassessmentinformativepaper150pointspoorfair-221031133746-eb5c1eb5/85/Final-Assessment-Informative-paper-150-Points-PoorFair-docx-1-320.jpg)
Recommended
Referencing using Murdoch’s Library Listing (APA shown) He.docx
Referencing using Murdoch’s Library Listing (APA shown)
Here is the book I want to reference. Clicking on the quote marks to the right of the listing will give me the referencing options
To format list with a Hanging Indent, highlight the entries and press Control_T.
Before:
Eldridge, D. E., Quee, M., & Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing:
Development of a children's headline indicator : Information paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health and
Welfare.
After:
Eldridge, D. E., Quee, M., & Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing:
Development of a children's headline indicator : Information paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health
and Welfare.
To alphabetise your Reference List, highlight the full list and click the sort icon on Word.
J J Murphy | 2018
Copy and paste the reference into your
Reference List. CHECK that the listing is
correct using the Murdoch APA
Referencing Guide.
NR512
HealthIT Topic of Week Assignment
Guidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
This assignment is designed to help students
Develop an appreciation for informatics, basic skills and knowledge required in practice settings. Students will select a “hot” or popular topic of particular interest to their practice to discuss. The topic will be selected from the website using the link provided in the course Assignments section.
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5.
Total Points Possible: 175
Requirements
Students will login to FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT using the link provided in the reading assignment module for Week 5 and select a “current/popular” topic of the week that may impact their practice. Students, in a professionally developed paper, will discuss the rationale for choosing the topic, how it will impact practice in a positive or negative manner, citing pros and cons. Include a discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. In the conclusion, provide recommendations for the future. Submit completed FierceHealthIT Topic paper for Wk. 5 to dropbox by end of Week 5. Preparing the paper
1. The FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT Current/Popular Topic of the Week assignment must be a professional, scholarly prepared paper. See the guidelines for writing a professional, scholarly paper in the Course Resources. The professional paper will have an introduction, body of paper to explain what you are doing, summary/conclusion, and at least three scholarly references.
2. Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside of course readings.
3. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition.
4. The paper (excluding the title page, introduction and reference page) is 4-6 pages in length.
5. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
6. Gr.
Sem 2 project rubrics lead
This document contains rubrics for evaluating projects, reports, and presentations.
The project rubric assesses topics on preparation/research, knowledge/content, creativity, organization, and execution. Points are awarded on a scale from 0-4.
The report rubric allocates marks for content (80%), presentation layout (15%), and references (5%). Content is judged on descriptions, explanations, and understanding demonstrated.
The presentation rubric evaluates organization, visual aids, verbal techniques, attire, subject knowledge, and confidence. Areas are scored from 1-4.
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. wha
This document outlines criteria for evaluating a student paper on collaboration in the juvenile justice system. It discusses the importance of considering opposing viewpoints, logically deriving conclusions, and adhering to formatting standards like APA style. Key points that must be addressed include the meaning of collaboration, challenges collaborative efforts face, and how to support positions with evidence from assigned readings and a Christian worldview perspective.
Immuno feedback .pdf
This feedback form summarizes an assessment of a student's immunology and microbiology essay. The marker identified strengths in the student's use of figures and engagement with current literature, but weaknesses in essay structure, referencing errors, and lack of depth. Suggestions for improvement include addressing spelling and grammar errors, increasing use of journal articles, improving essay flow and narrative, and adding more specific details about bacterial species and effects on the microbiome. The student intends to use this feedback to greatly improve essay structure, referencing format, and add more depth and complexity in future work.
Criteria for Grading Midterm Exam A B C F Points Ea.docx
Criteria for Grading Midterm Exam
A B C F
Points
Earned
Quality of
Content
(55 pts)
Student demonstrated
exceptional knowledge
of relevant concepts
and theories; all
statements and
opinions were
supported by
appropriate citations
from the literature.
55 - 50 points
Student demonstrated
satisfactory knowledge
of relevant concepts
and theories; most
statements and
opinions were
supported by
appropriate citations
from the literature.
49 - 44 points
Student demonstrated
less than satisfactory
knowledge of relevant
concepts and theories;
some statements and
opinions were not
supported by
appropriate citations
from the literature.
43 - 39 points
Student demonstrated
unsatisfactory
knowledge of relevant
concepts and theories;
many statements and
opinions were not
supported by
appropriate citations
from the literature.
38 - 0 points
Comments
Quality of
Research
(20 pts)
Student did an
exceptional job of
integrating course
readings with additional
research. Student cited
more than the required
number of references.
Sources listed were all
scholarly or practitioner
journals from the last
ten years.
20 - 18 points
Student did a
satisfactory job of
integrating course
readings with additional
research. Student cited
the required number of
references. Sources
listed were primarily
scholarly or practitioner
journals from the last
ten years.
17 – 16 points
Student did a less than
satisfactory job of
integrating course
readings with additional
research. Student may
not have cited the
required number of
references. Some
sources listed may not
have been scholarly or
practitioner journals
from the last ten years.
15 - 14 points
Student did an
inadequate job of
integrating course
readings with additional
research. Student did
not cite the required
number of references.
Many of the sources
listed were not
scholarly or practitioner
journals from the last
ten years.
13 – 0 points
Comments
Organization
and Mechanics
(20 pts)
Student presented
information in a logical
sequence that was very
easy to follow. Essay
had no major spelling
and/or grammar errors.
The page length
requirement was met.
20 – 18 points
Student presented
information in a mostly
logical sequence that
was fairly easy follow.
Essay had a few minor
spelling and/or
grammar errors. The
page length
requirement was met or
may have been slightly
exceeded.
17 – 16 points
Student presented
information in a
confusing sequence
that was not easy to
follow. Essay had
several major spelling
and/or grammar errors.
The page length
requirement may not
have been met.
15 - 14 points
Student presented
information in an
illogical sequence that
was difficult to follow.
Essay had many
spelling and/or
grammar errors. The
page length
requirement was not
met. .
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation:
Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
1. Summary:
What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
1. Assessment:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:
What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
1. Critique
Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.
Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg
Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS
Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs
Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php
Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/
Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Points Earned
Abstract
TOTAL: (15 points)
(10 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Topic Sentence
· Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis,
· Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research
Response to Assignment 3 Feedback
(5 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3?
10 points
Abstract contains all of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions.
5 points
Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for
Assignment 3
~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3
~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student
9 - 8 points
Abstract contains four of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions.
7 - 6 points
Abstract contains three of the required criteria.
Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement.
< 6 points
Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria.
Abstract is not present. (0 points)
0 points
Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3
Main Body Content
TOTAL: (50 ...
Recommended
Referencing using Murdoch’s Library Listing (APA shown) He.docx
Referencing using Murdoch’s Library Listing (APA shown)
Here is the book I want to reference. Clicking on the quote marks to the right of the listing will give me the referencing options
To format list with a Hanging Indent, highlight the entries and press Control_T.
Before:
Eldridge, D. E., Quee, M., & Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing:
Development of a children's headline indicator : Information paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health and
Welfare.
After:
Eldridge, D. E., Quee, M., & Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing:
Development of a children's headline indicator : Information paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health
and Welfare.
To alphabetise your Reference List, highlight the full list and click the sort icon on Word.
J J Murphy | 2018
Copy and paste the reference into your
Reference List. CHECK that the listing is
correct using the Murdoch APA
Referencing Guide.
NR512
HealthIT Topic of Week Assignment
Guidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
This assignment is designed to help students
Develop an appreciation for informatics, basic skills and knowledge required in practice settings. Students will select a “hot” or popular topic of particular interest to their practice to discuss. The topic will be selected from the website using the link provided in the course Assignments section.
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5.
Total Points Possible: 175
Requirements
Students will login to FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT using the link provided in the reading assignment module for Week 5 and select a “current/popular” topic of the week that may impact their practice. Students, in a professionally developed paper, will discuss the rationale for choosing the topic, how it will impact practice in a positive or negative manner, citing pros and cons. Include a discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. In the conclusion, provide recommendations for the future. Submit completed FierceHealthIT Topic paper for Wk. 5 to dropbox by end of Week 5. Preparing the paper
1. The FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT Current/Popular Topic of the Week assignment must be a professional, scholarly prepared paper. See the guidelines for writing a professional, scholarly paper in the Course Resources. The professional paper will have an introduction, body of paper to explain what you are doing, summary/conclusion, and at least three scholarly references.
2. Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside of course readings.
3. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition.
4. The paper (excluding the title page, introduction and reference page) is 4-6 pages in length.
5. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
6. Gr.
Sem 2 project rubrics lead
This document contains rubrics for evaluating projects, reports, and presentations.
The project rubric assesses topics on preparation/research, knowledge/content, creativity, organization, and execution. Points are awarded on a scale from 0-4.
The report rubric allocates marks for content (80%), presentation layout (15%), and references (5%). Content is judged on descriptions, explanations, and understanding demonstrated.
The presentation rubric evaluates organization, visual aids, verbal techniques, attire, subject knowledge, and confidence. Areas are scored from 1-4.
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. wha
This document outlines criteria for evaluating a student paper on collaboration in the juvenile justice system. It discusses the importance of considering opposing viewpoints, logically deriving conclusions, and adhering to formatting standards like APA style. Key points that must be addressed include the meaning of collaboration, challenges collaborative efforts face, and how to support positions with evidence from assigned readings and a Christian worldview perspective.
Immuno feedback .pdf
This feedback form summarizes an assessment of a student's immunology and microbiology essay. The marker identified strengths in the student's use of figures and engagement with current literature, but weaknesses in essay structure, referencing errors, and lack of depth. Suggestions for improvement include addressing spelling and grammar errors, increasing use of journal articles, improving essay flow and narrative, and adding more specific details about bacterial species and effects on the microbiome. The student intends to use this feedback to greatly improve essay structure, referencing format, and add more depth and complexity in future work.
Criteria for Grading Midterm Exam A B C F Points Ea.docx
Criteria for Grading Midterm Exam
A B C F
Points
Earned
Quality of
Content
(55 pts)
Student demonstrated
exceptional knowledge
of relevant concepts
and theories; all
statements and
opinions were
supported by
appropriate citations
from the literature.
55 - 50 points
Student demonstrated
satisfactory knowledge
of relevant concepts
and theories; most
statements and
opinions were
supported by
appropriate citations
from the literature.
49 - 44 points
Student demonstrated
less than satisfactory
knowledge of relevant
concepts and theories;
some statements and
opinions were not
supported by
appropriate citations
from the literature.
43 - 39 points
Student demonstrated
unsatisfactory
knowledge of relevant
concepts and theories;
many statements and
opinions were not
supported by
appropriate citations
from the literature.
38 - 0 points
Comments
Quality of
Research
(20 pts)
Student did an
exceptional job of
integrating course
readings with additional
research. Student cited
more than the required
number of references.
Sources listed were all
scholarly or practitioner
journals from the last
ten years.
20 - 18 points
Student did a
satisfactory job of
integrating course
readings with additional
research. Student cited
the required number of
references. Sources
listed were primarily
scholarly or practitioner
journals from the last
ten years.
17 – 16 points
Student did a less than
satisfactory job of
integrating course
readings with additional
research. Student may
not have cited the
required number of
references. Some
sources listed may not
have been scholarly or
practitioner journals
from the last ten years.
15 - 14 points
Student did an
inadequate job of
integrating course
readings with additional
research. Student did
not cite the required
number of references.
Many of the sources
listed were not
scholarly or practitioner
journals from the last
ten years.
13 – 0 points
Comments
Organization
and Mechanics
(20 pts)
Student presented
information in a logical
sequence that was very
easy to follow. Essay
had no major spelling
and/or grammar errors.
The page length
requirement was met.
20 – 18 points
Student presented
information in a mostly
logical sequence that
was fairly easy follow.
Essay had a few minor
spelling and/or
grammar errors. The
page length
requirement was met or
may have been slightly
exceeded.
17 – 16 points
Student presented
information in a
confusing sequence
that was not easy to
follow. Essay had
several major spelling
and/or grammar errors.
The page length
requirement may not
have been met.
15 - 14 points
Student presented
information in an
illogical sequence that
was difficult to follow.
Essay had many
spelling and/or
grammar errors. The
page length
requirement was not
met. .
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation:
Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
1. Summary:
What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
1. Assessment:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:
What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
1. Critique
Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.
Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg
Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS
Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs
Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php
Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/
Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Points Earned
Abstract
TOTAL: (15 points)
(10 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Topic Sentence
· Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis,
· Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research
Response to Assignment 3 Feedback
(5 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3?
10 points
Abstract contains all of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions.
5 points
Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for
Assignment 3
~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3
~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student
9 - 8 points
Abstract contains four of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions.
7 - 6 points
Abstract contains three of the required criteria.
Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement.
< 6 points
Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria.
Abstract is not present. (0 points)
0 points
Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3
Main Body Content
TOTAL: (50 ...
Introduction, Thesis Statement, and ClaimTotal 3.50Distinguis.docx
Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Claim
Total: 3.50
Distinguished - Provides a clear and focused introduction and thesis statement with claim that defines the issue or problem, addresses the importance of the topic, and thoroughly explains its relation to one’s field of study. The thesis statement is declarative and proposes an appropriate and feasible solution to the problem or issue.
Proficient - Provides a clear and focused introduction paragraph and thesis statement with claim that defines the issue or problem, addresses the importance of the topic, and explains its relation to one’s field of study. The thesis statement is declarative and proposes a solution to the problem or issue. Minor details are missing or the solution is slightly inappropriate or not feasible.
Basic - Provides a vague introduction paragraph and a thesis statement with claim that minimally defines the issue or problem, partially addresses the importance of the topic, and partially explains its relation to one’s field of study. The thesis statement is somewhat declarative and proposes a solution to the problem or issue. Relevant details are missing and/or the solution is inappropriate and/or not feasible.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an introduction paragraph and a thesis statement with claim; however, the thesis statement is not declarative, the solution to the problem or issue is entirely inappropriate and not feasible, and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The introduction, thesis statement and claim are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Creates an Argument
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Creates a complete argument, including claims and evidence without obvious logical fallacies that fully addresses one’s major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs one’s view of the topic.
Proficient - Creates an argument including claims and evidence without obvious logical fallacies that addresses one’s major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs one’s view of the topic. The argument is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Creates a partial argument, including some claims and evidence that vaguely addresses one’s major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs one’s view of the topic. The argument is underdeveloped and/or logical fallacies are present.
Below Expectations - Attempts to create an argument; however, does not include claims and evidence to address one’s major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs one’s view of the topic. The argument is significantly underdeveloped and many logical fallacies are present.
Non-Performance - The creation of an argument is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Evaluates Ethical Outcomes
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively and effectively evaluates the ethical outcomes that result from the position taken on the issue and thoro.
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
EDUC 701
Course Project: Final Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Title Page and Abstract
10 points
A title page is present and provides clarity to the purpose of the paper. An effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body is provided by the abstract. Word count (100–120 words) is met.
8 to 9 points
A title page is present but lacks clarity to the purpose of the paper. The Abstract exists but does not provide an effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body. Minimum of 100 words is met.
1 to 7 points
A title page is missing. The Abstract is vague and does not convey a personal philosophy of education. The 100-word minimum is not met.
0 points
Not present
Body – Introduction/ Thesis Statement
10 points
Introduction is well-constructed and presents a clear explanation of the problem, conveys a good argument of why the problem is good to research, concludes with the research question, and is strongly aligned with the title and body of the paper.
8 to 9 points
A somewhat clear presentation of the problem is present, an argument why the problem is good to research is conveyed, and the title and body of the paper aligns with it.
1 to 8 points
The problem is poorly introduced, vaguely stated, or does not align with the title and/or body of the paper.
0 points
Not present
Body – Literature Review and Learning Theory or Theories
37 to 40 points
Literature synthesizes references to support the topic. Learning theories are introduced as well as foundational people and their works. Theoretical frameworks are presented coherently and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
34 to 36 points
Literature review somewhat synthesizes the references to support the topic. Learning theories are somewhat introduced. Theoretical frameworks are mostly presented and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
1 to 33 points
Literature review poorly synthesizes the references that support the topic. Learning theories are poorly introduced and explained. Theoretical frameworks are not presented.
0 points
Not present
Body – Key Terms
18 to 20 points
Key terms are well defined, and definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
17 points
Key terms are defined, and most definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
1 to 16 points
Key terms are adequately defined, and most definitions are not supported by an authoritative source.
0 points
Not present
Body – Gaps in Literature
18 to 20 points
Gaps in the literature are thoroughly identified and described by careful analysis of content.
17 points
Gaps in the literature are somewhat identified and described by careful analysis of content.
1 to 16 points
Gaps in the literature are not present or are inadequately described.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
18 to 20 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropr ...
Healthcare Policy and Economic Discussion.docx
This document provides instructions for an assignment on healthcare policy and economic discussion. Students are asked to reflect on their future role in healthcare and how it may change due to policy changes like the Affordable Care Act. They should discuss how they will advocate for patients and the healthcare consumer. The assignment should be 1,500-2,000 words and address these questions in a clear, concise manner while citing at least two scholarly references. It will be graded based on content, organization, logic/argument, sources, and quality of written communication.
TITLE OF PAPER HERE1TITLE OF PAPER HERE3Full Title
TITLE OF PAPER HERE 1
TITLE OF PAPER HERE 3
Full Title of Paper Here
Student Name (First M. Last)
Counselor Education and Family Studies, Liberty University
Author Note
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
Email:
Full Title
Start with an introduction (don’t use a title for it). The intro will have the purpose of the paper, brief background (what culture you are discussing), brief outline of the paper for reader (what they should be expecting), and transition sentence to the first heading, “Events Attended” – one paragraph.
Events Attended (level 1 headings)
Describe the events attended and what happened (aprox. 250-300 words)
Comparison with Expectations
Discuss how your experience of actual cultural events compare with the expectations you had developed from the readings and Internet/media explorations you did in Cultural Immersion Project – Part 1. (approximately 250 words)
Emotional Impact
Describe how participation in these immersion events impact you emotionally. In other words, what was it like to be a minority in this group? (approximately 250 words)
As you consider your own cultural background, describe why do you think you responded the way you did? (approximately 250 words)
Key Things Learned
What are some key things that you have learned about this culture through these events? (approximately 250 words)
Counseling Theories Validated for This Group
Discuss counseling theories and techniques that have been empirically validated as effective with this group. You can use the McGoldrick et al. text for this section, and peer reviewed articles. Use a minimum of three resources. (approximately 250 words).
Identify three theoretical approaches (i.e. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Reality Therapy, Person-Centered, etc.) that have been empirically validated as effective with the selected group (for any credit student must cite a peer reviewed journal supporting the use of the theory given).
Identify three counseling techniques (miracle question, reflective listening, thought-stopping techniques, mindfulness, etc.) that have been empirically validated as effective with the selected group (for any credit student must cite a peer reviewed journal supporting the use of the technique given).
Student describes how characteristics noted above relate to counseling with this group, including resilience building and eliminating obstacles and illuminating opportunities.
References
References start here with a hanging indent. Double space and list references alphabetically by author’s last name. Review your APA Manual for formatting requirements for specific types of sources.
References should include at least 3 scholarly sources on your cultural group of interest (the resources must published by 2005 or later) focusing on counseling theories and counseling techniques. A pertinent, unassigned chapter from the McGoldrick et al. text may count as 1 of these reso ...
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741
Course Project: Part 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Analysis
13 to 14 points
The analysis thoroughly interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
12 points
The analysis partially interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
1 to 11 points
The analysis attempts of some aspects of analysis and interpretation of journal articles in a limited way. The review is more descriptive than analytical.
0 points
Not present
Use of Evidence and Relevant Outside Information
13 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with relevant facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is often incorporated into the analysis.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally supported with relevant facts, arguments, and details. Information outside the subject articles is occasionally incorporated into the analysis.
1 to 10 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with some facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is incorporated in a limited way into the analysis.
0 points
Not present
Organization and Development
13 points
The analysis is quite well-reasoned, indicating substantial breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is thorough and meaningful.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally well-reasoned, indicating some breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is generally sound.
1 to 10 points
The analysis has limited reasoning, indicating a surface understanding of the articles. The summary of each article is limited.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
13 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropriate Scripture references, course requirements, and application.
11 to 12 points
A biblical worldview perspective is articulated but is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and somewhat applies to course requirements and application.
1 to 10 points
A biblical worldview perspective is poorly articulated and is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and does not apply to course requirements and application.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Grammar and Spelling
6 points
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
5 points
There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
1 to 4 points
There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 points
There are more than 10 errors in the grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
Sentence Structure and Mechanics
6 points
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in lengt.
Criteria for Grading Midterm Exam A B C F Points Ea.docx
This document outlines the criteria for grading a midterm exam across four categories: quality of content, quality of research, organization and mechanics, and APA formatting. Points are awarded on a scale for each category based on criteria such as demonstrating knowledge, integrating research, logical organization, and correct formatting. An overall total points earned out of 100 is calculated and additional comments can be provided.
OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences
The document outlines instructions for a Week 4 assignment in an online nursing course. Students are asked to complete an interactive sociologic sciences case study, associate what they have learned about related theories, and submit a journal entry reflecting on their experience. The reflection should make comparisons between the case study, related theories studied, and examples from the student's own nursing practice. A rubric is provided to evaluate the assignments on critical analysis, content, mechanics, and APA format.
Criteria Ratings PointsContentAnalyzes theMaterial
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Analyzes the
Material
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
All elements of the
assigned topic are
clearly and completely
addressed in light of
applicable page
limits/presentation
length limits (5–7
pages or 10–12
minutes of
student-spoken audio).
Analyses flow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly
and reach the nuances
of the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with
precision, clarity and
detail.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Major elements of
the assigned topic
are discussed in a
meaningful way
but the
paper/presentation
would benefit from
additional clarity,
depth, or detail.
Analyses are
generally well
constructed.
Complex issues
are recognized.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the
assigned topic are
mentioned but the
discussion is incomplete,
unclear, superficial, too
general or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
Assigned
elements are not
discussed.
35 pts
Content
Organization
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
The
paper/presentation is
focused and well
organized. The
paper/presentation
has a clear thesis, and
a clear and
substantive
introduction and
conclusion. The
paper/presentation
effectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus
and deepen analyses.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
The
paper/presentation
is reasonably well
organized and
follows a logical
path from idea to
idea and section to
section. The
paper/presentation
includes an
adequate
introduction and
conclusion.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The paper/presentation is
in need of additional
organization and clarity.
Ideas and/or sections of
the paper/presentation
either do not flow logically
or are in need of
fundamental improvement.
The paper is lacking an
adequate introduction
and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not Present
The
paper/presentation
lacks meaningful
organization and
the paper lacks
and introduction
and conclusion.
35 pts
Research Paper or Presentation: Final Grading Rubric |
PSCI600_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Evaluation,
Synthesis
and
Adequate
use of
Sources
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts and
ideas are evaluated
critically and
synthesized in a
manner that moves
beyond restatement
and makes a valuable
contribution to the
assigned topic.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Sources are used
correctly and
support the
paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and
ideas are
understood and
linked in a
reasonable way
that supports the
paper’s
conclusions.
Paper reflects a
good familiarity
with the major
ideas but would
benefit from
greater critical
evaluation and
syntheses.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used
but not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an
effective manner.
Paper/presentation would
benefit from more
substantive use of sources,
more appropriate reliance
on sources, and/or better
skill in evaluating,
sy ...
Healthcare Policy and Economics.docx
This assignment asks students to reflect on patient safety and satisfaction in healthcare by answering four questions in 1500-2000 words. The questions address how patient safety measures can lead to cost savings, defining the role of the Joint Commission in healthcare, reflecting on one's future role in contributing to patient safety, and the role of the chief nursing officer regarding patient safety. The assignment expects students to thoroughly address the questions using at least two scholarly references cited in APA style. It will be graded based on content, organization, logic/argument, use of references, and quality of written communication.
BUS3055 Week 1 Project RubricActivity Week 1 ProjectCou
BUS3055 Week 1 Project Rubric
Activity: Week 1 Project
Course: BUS3055-Business Law for Commercial Transactions SU01
Name: Sandra Villarreal
15 / 20
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(14–15)
15 points
Proficient (B range)
(16–17)
17 points
Exemplary (A range)
(18–20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed the facts
in one scenario
and developed
substantive
arguments and
recommendations
using legal cases
and scholarly
sources that
reflected an
understanding of
the course
material.
Did not identify the
facts or develop
substantive
arguments and
recommendations.
Unsupported with
research.
Identified facts, basic
arguments and
recommendations.
Lacked credible
research support.
Analyzed the facts
and provided detailed
arguments and
recommendations.
Sufficiently supported
with research.
Analysis of the facts,
arguments and
recommendations
was compelling and
showed well-
developed logical
progression.
Well supported by
research.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(14–15)
15 points
Proficient (B range)
(16–17)
17 points
Exemplary (A range)
(18–20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Described the facts,
arguments and
recommendations.
Weakly supported
with research.
15 / 20
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(14–15)
15 points
Proficient (B range)
(16–17)
17 points
Exemplary (A range)
(18–20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed the facts
in one scenario
and developed
substantive
arguments and
recommendations
using legal cases
and scholarly
sources that
reflected an
understanding of
the course
material.
Did not identify the
facts or develop
substantive
arguments and
recommendations.
Unsupported with
research.
basic arguments and
recommendations.
Lacked credible
research support.
Analyzed the facts
and provided detailed
arguments and
recommendations.
Sufficiently supported
with research.
Analysis of the facts,
arguments and
recommendations was
compelling and
showed well-
developed logical
progression.
Well supported by
research.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–6)
6 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(7)
7 points
Proficient (B range)
(8)
8 points
Exemplary (A range)
(9–10)
10 points
Criterion Score
Described the facts,
arguments and
recommendations.
Weakly supported
with research.
Total 38 / 50
Overall Score
8 / 10
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–6)
6 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(7)
7 points
Proficient (B range)
(8)
8 points
Exemplary (A range)
(9–10)
10 points
Criterion Score
Wrote in a clear,
concise, and
organized manner;
demonstrated
ethical scholarship
in accurate
representation
and attribution of
sources (i.e., APA);
and displayed
accurate spelling,
grammar, and
pu ...
Florida National UniversityResearch Assignment #1PurposeThe
Florida National University
Research Assignment #1Purpose
The student will read and understand the given case scenario and further develop a hypothetical project. The student will answer given questions that will serve as a guide for this project. Also, the student will explain key concepts and apply theoretical frameworks, models and/ or theories pertinent to this case.General directions
1. You will submit one (1) paper as part of this assignment (individual assignment).
2. Your research paper must follow APA format according to Publication Manual American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.). Include a cover page and headings per 6th edition APA guidelines.
3. The research paper should be minimum of 3 pages (not including the title or reference pages) – maximum of 6 pages (not including the title or reference pages), single spaced, Times New Roman, Size 12, and 5 references related to the topic (3 must be peer-reviewed journal articles).Research Paper
4. Include the following components in your research paper:
a. Title Page
b. Introduction
c. Problem Statement
d. Population of Interest
e. Key concepts such as: obesity, social determinants of health, health promotion and risk reduction, role of community health nurses.
f. Theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models
g. Planning community intervention / Funding
h. Evaluate the community-level intervention
i. Social marketing / resources
j. Research studies (at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles)
k. Conclusion
l. References Page
5. All Florida National University policies related to plagiarism must be observed.Directions and Grading Criteria: Research paper #1
Category
Points
Description
Introduction
5
The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).
Problem Statement
10
Fully describe the primary problem you are addressing as part of your potential hypothetical project. Integrate contemporary/scholarly evidence (no more than 7 years old) to support the need for change.
Population of Interest
5
Describe your population of interest.
Key
Concepts
10
1. Introduce / explain key concepts such as: obesity, social determinants of health, health promotion and risk reduction, role of community health nurses.
2. Theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models
10
Describe and apply a behavioral change model that addresses health promotion and risk reduction in this particular case (theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models discussed on Chapter 5 of textbook).
3. Planning community intervention / Funding
10
Describe the selection of the most appropriate intervention / Describe your implementation plan. Apply collaboration / teamwork / funding. Provide explanation. Support your answer with evidence-based research literature.
4. Evaluate the community-level intervention
10
Describe your evaluation of the community-le ...
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
- Addison's disease is a disorder that was chosen to research. The key aspects that must be discussed include the pathophysiology, most common presenting symptoms, how it is diagnosed, and a standard treatment plan. National screening and treatment guidelines should also be referenced if available.
- Additional scholarly sources beyond the course materials should be used. When researching, look for unique information that may surprise the reader rather than just common facts.
- The discussion post will be evaluated based on criteria such as the quality of the initial post and peer responses, use of scholarly sources, organization, grammar and APA style.
Evaluation and Marking Scheme for Individual Assignments .docx
Evaluation and Marking Scheme for Individual Assignments
1-What is the issue, problem, event?
2-What are the causes of these problems, issues?
3-Can these issues, problems could have been solved in different ways?
4-If so, How?
Explain with a plan with supporting information collected from both online
and offline sources.
5-Is there any other similar issues, events, examples that might be used as a
comparison or yardstick with your subject?
6-What is the situation right now?
7-What are your expectations for the future?
Marking
Total
Content
Marking
100%
Ability to understand the
issues, problems, solutions
40%
Academic Research,
Discourse Skills
40%
Basic Writing
and Proper
Referencing
Skills
20%
90-100 The writer shows
outstanding
understanding
and content
knowledge.
The reader
understands the
issue
completely; if
there are any
mistakes they
do not interfere
with the
meaning.
There is a clear logical argument,
with the points well-ordered and
fully supported. It responds
appropriately to the issues with
academic search and update.
Pleasingly broad
range of sentence
structure and
vocabulary is used,
references and
subjects updated
properly and
presented in excellent
shape.
80-85 The writer
demonstrates
sound basic
knowledge and
understanding of
the relevant
area.
The reader
understands the
issue, although
some sections
need to be
investigated
more than once.
The answer responds more or less
to the issues investigated. The use
of supporting evidence, illustration
and argument is relevant but not
necessarily sufficient.
There is a good range
of sentence structure
and vocabulary with a
number of minor
errors in referencing
and updating the
subject and presented
in an acceptable
shape.
70-75 The writer does
little exhibit
adequate basic
knowledge of the
topic area.
The reader has
difficulty in
understanding
the issue,
A point of view is presented, but it
is not clear. Attempts to include
supporting evidence, illustration or
argument are made without proper
academic search.
There are noticeable
presentation errors,
these significantly
interfere with the
reader understanding
the issues
60-70 The writer does
not exhibit basic
knowledge of the
topic area
The reader has
difficulty
understanding
the issue,
although there
are little signs of
meaning
breaking
through.
The argument does not progress
smoothly. Main points and
supporting material are not clearly
distinguished from each other.
The presentation is
not properly done,
literature search is not
evident.
60-50 The writer shows
no evidence of
knowing the
relevant content.
The reader can
hardly
understand the
issue at all.
The ideas or facts presented have
little apparent relation to each
other or to the issues covered .
Errors in presentation,
structural problems,
no evidence of
literature search ...
Identifying A Clinical Question.pdf
The document provides guidelines for a student assignment to identify a clinical question related to their practice area. It instructs the student to write the clinical question in PICOT format, describe why the topic is important, perform a literature search to find 5 relevant research articles on the topic using specified databases, and identify the most relevant article to answer the clinical question. The student is to write a 1000-1500 word paper addressing these points and citing at least 5 sources using APA style.
The following pairs of co-morbid disorders and a write 700 words .docx
The following pairs of co-morbid disorders and a write 700 words
based on your research:
Depression and substance abuse
Address
the following:
Discuss the general concept of co-morbidity.
Format
your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
.
The following is an access verification technique, listing several f.docx
The following is an access verification technique, listing several files and the access allowed for a single use.
Identify the control technique used here and for each,
explain the type of access allowed
.
a. File_1 R-E-
b. File_12 RWE
c. File_13 RW--
d. File_14 --E-
2.
. The following is an access verification technique, listing several users and the access allowed for File_13.
Identify the control technique used here and for each and
explain the type of access allowed.
Finally, describe who is included in the WORLD category.
a. User_10 --E-
b. User_14 RWED
c. User_17 RWE-
d. WORLD R---
.
The following discussion board post has to have a response. Please r.docx
The following discussion board post has to have a response. Please read the post and respond back according to the instructions attached below. Make sure to respond as instructed. Check attachment for response instruction and respond accordingly.
The instructions for the response to post is attached and highlighted.
The due date is Tuesday 5/10/2021 by 11:59 a.m. NO LATE WORK WILL BE ACCEPTED!
.
The following information has been taken from the ledger accounts of.docx
The following information has been taken from the ledger accounts of Isaac Stern Corporation
Total Income since incorporation$317,000
Total Cash Dividends pai d60,000
Total value of stock dividends distributed30,000
Gains on treasury stock transactions18,000
Unamortized discount of bonds payable32,000
Directions: Determine the current balance of retained earnings
.
The following attach files are my History Homewrok and Lecture Power.docx
The following attach files are my History Homewrok and Lecture Power Point. Please answer those questions by your own words and read the instructions carefully beofer you start writing.
Course Information:
In this course we will survey the history of technological developments from the Renaissance to the current day. We will focus on a series of technological objects—machines, tools, and systems—considering them in their broader historical (social, cultural, and political) contexts. Organized chronologically we will trace this history beginning with Leonardo Da Vinci and ending with the International Space Station. This is not, however, a teleological assessment, which assumes a progressive improvement of technology—each age has merits in its own rights.
.
The following is adapted from the work of Paul Martin Lester.In .docx
The following is adapted from the work of Paul Martin Lester.
In order to find meaning from a visual message, you need to learn a systematic way for studying images.
1.
Make an inventory list of every element in the image,
2.
Note the lighting used in the image,
3.
Note any eye contact by subjects in the image,
4.
Note the visual cues of color, form, depth, and movement,
5.
Note how the gestalt laws apply toward the composition of picture,
6.
Note any semiotic signs that are a part of the image's content, and
When you've gone through the six steps noted above, it's time to apply the six perspectives for visual analysis to the piece. Each perspective is noted below.
Personal Perspective - Gut Reaction
Rick Williams' Omniphasism (all in balance) or Personal Impact Analysis
1.
What is the picture's story?
2.
List primary words.
3.
List associative words.
4.
Select most significant associative words.
5.
Pair up primary & most significant associative words.
6.
Relate word pairs with your own feelings.
7.
Relate any inner symbolism.
8.
Write a brief story concerning personal insights.
Historical Perspective - The image's place in history
When do you think the image was made?
Is there a specific style that the image imitates?
Technical Perspective - Consider the process decisions
How was the image produced?
What techniques were employed?
Is the image of good quality?
Ethical Perspective - Moral Responsibility
Was the image maker socially responsible?
Has any person's rights been violated?
Are the needs of viewers met?
Is the picture aesthetically appealing?
Do the picture choices reflect moderation?
Is the image maker empathetic with the subject?
Can all the image choices be justified?
Does the visual message cause unjustified harm?
Cultural Perspective - Societal Impact
What is the story and the symbolism involved with the elements in the visual message?
What do they say about current cultural values?
Critical Perspective - Reasoned Opinion
What do I think of this image now that I've spent so much time looking and studying it?
Project Overview:
This week, you were introduced to six analytical perspectives for analyzing media. These perspectives form the foundation for your Media Analysis Project (MAP). Over the next three weeks, you will analyze a visual work from any media (print, film, television, Internet), of your own choosing.
Due Date:
June 5
Time Line:
·
Topic Assignment (Listed under Paper Topic)
·
June 5 Thesis and Outline (Listed in appropriate headings below)
·
June 5 Final Paper
NOTE: Thesis and Outline, and Final Paper are two separate documents.
Requirements:
Your analysis must encompass all six perspectives. This will be a detailed analysis consisting of 6-8 written pages. You must also use four credible academic sources in addition to the media itself. All sources must be cited in-text as well as on a reference page using standard APA format. Information on using .
The following article is related to deterring employee fraud within .docx
The document summarizes key findings from a report on occupational fraud. It finds that while asset misappropriation is most common, fraudulent financial statements cause the highest losses. Small businesses are most vulnerable due to lack of audits and controls. Establishing anonymous hotlines is the most effective way to reduce fraud losses, more so than audits. Fraud by executives results in highest losses and is best detected through tips rather than controls.
The Five stages of ChangeBy Thursday, June 25, 2015, respond to .docx
The Five stages of Change
By Thursday, June 25, 2015, respond to the discussion.
Discussion Question
Anthony is a 27 year old heterosexual Caucasian male. He was arrested 2 weeks ago for his second DWI and is facing a license suspension. He works as a delivery driver for a local store and after disclosing the arrest to his employer, as well as the consequences including loss of his license, he was terminated.
Anthony lives with his girlfriend of 3 years and their 2 year old son. Anthony’s drinking behavior has increased to consumption of a case of beer on Saturday and Sunday evenings each week. He consumes several beers after work during the week “to maintain.” He has also been using methamphetamines, specifically “crystal meth” several times weekly. Anthony’s girlfriend ended their relationship as a result of his increasing substance use and ongoing difficulties. Anthony feels depressed and anxious about his current life situation, especially now that he realizes that he has no job and may be homeless because of his substance use. He is also feeling down about the loss of his relationship. He researched a few outpatient treatment programs to help him stop using both alcohol and methamphetamines, but is ambivalent about entering treatment. Anthony has considered the need to stop using substances to improve his life and relationships with significant others, though fears that he will lose his friends and miss partying with them if he stops. He also fears what life will be like without the comfort of getting high.
Consider and discuss the 5 stages of change. Based upon the information provided discuss what stage Anthony is in, and provide a rationale for your decision. Next, discuss the other stages of change and what indicators we might see as Anthony progresses on through these stages. Your posting must be a minimum of 500 words.
.
More Related Content
Similar to Final Assessment Informative paper [150 Points]PoorFair.docx
Introduction, Thesis Statement, and ClaimTotal 3.50Distinguis.docx
Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Claim
Total: 3.50
Distinguished - Provides a clear and focused introduction and thesis statement with claim that defines the issue or problem, addresses the importance of the topic, and thoroughly explains its relation to one’s field of study. The thesis statement is declarative and proposes an appropriate and feasible solution to the problem or issue.
Proficient - Provides a clear and focused introduction paragraph and thesis statement with claim that defines the issue or problem, addresses the importance of the topic, and explains its relation to one’s field of study. The thesis statement is declarative and proposes a solution to the problem or issue. Minor details are missing or the solution is slightly inappropriate or not feasible.
Basic - Provides a vague introduction paragraph and a thesis statement with claim that minimally defines the issue or problem, partially addresses the importance of the topic, and partially explains its relation to one’s field of study. The thesis statement is somewhat declarative and proposes a solution to the problem or issue. Relevant details are missing and/or the solution is inappropriate and/or not feasible.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an introduction paragraph and a thesis statement with claim; however, the thesis statement is not declarative, the solution to the problem or issue is entirely inappropriate and not feasible, and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The introduction, thesis statement and claim are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Creates an Argument
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Creates a complete argument, including claims and evidence without obvious logical fallacies that fully addresses one’s major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs one’s view of the topic.
Proficient - Creates an argument including claims and evidence without obvious logical fallacies that addresses one’s major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs one’s view of the topic. The argument is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Creates a partial argument, including some claims and evidence that vaguely addresses one’s major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs one’s view of the topic. The argument is underdeveloped and/or logical fallacies are present.
Below Expectations - Attempts to create an argument; however, does not include claims and evidence to address one’s major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs one’s view of the topic. The argument is significantly underdeveloped and many logical fallacies are present.
Non-Performance - The creation of an argument is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Evaluates Ethical Outcomes
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively and effectively evaluates the ethical outcomes that result from the position taken on the issue and thoro.
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
EDUC 701
Course Project: Final Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Title Page and Abstract
10 points
A title page is present and provides clarity to the purpose of the paper. An effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body is provided by the abstract. Word count (100–120 words) is met.
8 to 9 points
A title page is present but lacks clarity to the purpose of the paper. The Abstract exists but does not provide an effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body. Minimum of 100 words is met.
1 to 7 points
A title page is missing. The Abstract is vague and does not convey a personal philosophy of education. The 100-word minimum is not met.
0 points
Not present
Body – Introduction/ Thesis Statement
10 points
Introduction is well-constructed and presents a clear explanation of the problem, conveys a good argument of why the problem is good to research, concludes with the research question, and is strongly aligned with the title and body of the paper.
8 to 9 points
A somewhat clear presentation of the problem is present, an argument why the problem is good to research is conveyed, and the title and body of the paper aligns with it.
1 to 8 points
The problem is poorly introduced, vaguely stated, or does not align with the title and/or body of the paper.
0 points
Not present
Body – Literature Review and Learning Theory or Theories
37 to 40 points
Literature synthesizes references to support the topic. Learning theories are introduced as well as foundational people and their works. Theoretical frameworks are presented coherently and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
34 to 36 points
Literature review somewhat synthesizes the references to support the topic. Learning theories are somewhat introduced. Theoretical frameworks are mostly presented and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
1 to 33 points
Literature review poorly synthesizes the references that support the topic. Learning theories are poorly introduced and explained. Theoretical frameworks are not presented.
0 points
Not present
Body – Key Terms
18 to 20 points
Key terms are well defined, and definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
17 points
Key terms are defined, and most definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
1 to 16 points
Key terms are adequately defined, and most definitions are not supported by an authoritative source.
0 points
Not present
Body – Gaps in Literature
18 to 20 points
Gaps in the literature are thoroughly identified and described by careful analysis of content.
17 points
Gaps in the literature are somewhat identified and described by careful analysis of content.
1 to 16 points
Gaps in the literature are not present or are inadequately described.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
18 to 20 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropr ...
Healthcare Policy and Economic Discussion.docx
This document provides instructions for an assignment on healthcare policy and economic discussion. Students are asked to reflect on their future role in healthcare and how it may change due to policy changes like the Affordable Care Act. They should discuss how they will advocate for patients and the healthcare consumer. The assignment should be 1,500-2,000 words and address these questions in a clear, concise manner while citing at least two scholarly references. It will be graded based on content, organization, logic/argument, sources, and quality of written communication.
TITLE OF PAPER HERE1TITLE OF PAPER HERE3Full Title
TITLE OF PAPER HERE 1
TITLE OF PAPER HERE 3
Full Title of Paper Here
Student Name (First M. Last)
Counselor Education and Family Studies, Liberty University
Author Note
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
Email:
Full Title
Start with an introduction (don’t use a title for it). The intro will have the purpose of the paper, brief background (what culture you are discussing), brief outline of the paper for reader (what they should be expecting), and transition sentence to the first heading, “Events Attended” – one paragraph.
Events Attended (level 1 headings)
Describe the events attended and what happened (aprox. 250-300 words)
Comparison with Expectations
Discuss how your experience of actual cultural events compare with the expectations you had developed from the readings and Internet/media explorations you did in Cultural Immersion Project – Part 1. (approximately 250 words)
Emotional Impact
Describe how participation in these immersion events impact you emotionally. In other words, what was it like to be a minority in this group? (approximately 250 words)
As you consider your own cultural background, describe why do you think you responded the way you did? (approximately 250 words)
Key Things Learned
What are some key things that you have learned about this culture through these events? (approximately 250 words)
Counseling Theories Validated for This Group
Discuss counseling theories and techniques that have been empirically validated as effective with this group. You can use the McGoldrick et al. text for this section, and peer reviewed articles. Use a minimum of three resources. (approximately 250 words).
Identify three theoretical approaches (i.e. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Reality Therapy, Person-Centered, etc.) that have been empirically validated as effective with the selected group (for any credit student must cite a peer reviewed journal supporting the use of the theory given).
Identify three counseling techniques (miracle question, reflective listening, thought-stopping techniques, mindfulness, etc.) that have been empirically validated as effective with the selected group (for any credit student must cite a peer reviewed journal supporting the use of the technique given).
Student describes how characteristics noted above relate to counseling with this group, including resilience building and eliminating obstacles and illuminating opportunities.
References
References start here with a hanging indent. Double space and list references alphabetically by author’s last name. Review your APA Manual for formatting requirements for specific types of sources.
References should include at least 3 scholarly sources on your cultural group of interest (the resources must published by 2005 or later) focusing on counseling theories and counseling techniques. A pertinent, unassigned chapter from the McGoldrick et al. text may count as 1 of these reso ...
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741
Course Project: Part 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Analysis
13 to 14 points
The analysis thoroughly interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
12 points
The analysis partially interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
1 to 11 points
The analysis attempts of some aspects of analysis and interpretation of journal articles in a limited way. The review is more descriptive than analytical.
0 points
Not present
Use of Evidence and Relevant Outside Information
13 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with relevant facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is often incorporated into the analysis.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally supported with relevant facts, arguments, and details. Information outside the subject articles is occasionally incorporated into the analysis.
1 to 10 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with some facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is incorporated in a limited way into the analysis.
0 points
Not present
Organization and Development
13 points
The analysis is quite well-reasoned, indicating substantial breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is thorough and meaningful.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally well-reasoned, indicating some breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is generally sound.
1 to 10 points
The analysis has limited reasoning, indicating a surface understanding of the articles. The summary of each article is limited.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
13 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropriate Scripture references, course requirements, and application.
11 to 12 points
A biblical worldview perspective is articulated but is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and somewhat applies to course requirements and application.
1 to 10 points
A biblical worldview perspective is poorly articulated and is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and does not apply to course requirements and application.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Grammar and Spelling
6 points
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
5 points
There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
1 to 4 points
There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 points
There are more than 10 errors in the grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
Sentence Structure and Mechanics
6 points
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in lengt.
Criteria for Grading Midterm Exam A B C F Points Ea.docx
This document outlines the criteria for grading a midterm exam across four categories: quality of content, quality of research, organization and mechanics, and APA formatting. Points are awarded on a scale for each category based on criteria such as demonstrating knowledge, integrating research, logical organization, and correct formatting. An overall total points earned out of 100 is calculated and additional comments can be provided.
OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences
The document outlines instructions for a Week 4 assignment in an online nursing course. Students are asked to complete an interactive sociologic sciences case study, associate what they have learned about related theories, and submit a journal entry reflecting on their experience. The reflection should make comparisons between the case study, related theories studied, and examples from the student's own nursing practice. A rubric is provided to evaluate the assignments on critical analysis, content, mechanics, and APA format.
Criteria Ratings PointsContentAnalyzes theMaterial
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Analyzes the
Material
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
All elements of the
assigned topic are
clearly and completely
addressed in light of
applicable page
limits/presentation
length limits (5–7
pages or 10–12
minutes of
student-spoken audio).
Analyses flow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly
and reach the nuances
of the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with
precision, clarity and
detail.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Major elements of
the assigned topic
are discussed in a
meaningful way
but the
paper/presentation
would benefit from
additional clarity,
depth, or detail.
Analyses are
generally well
constructed.
Complex issues
are recognized.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the
assigned topic are
mentioned but the
discussion is incomplete,
unclear, superficial, too
general or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
Assigned
elements are not
discussed.
35 pts
Content
Organization
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
The
paper/presentation is
focused and well
organized. The
paper/presentation
has a clear thesis, and
a clear and
substantive
introduction and
conclusion. The
paper/presentation
effectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus
and deepen analyses.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
The
paper/presentation
is reasonably well
organized and
follows a logical
path from idea to
idea and section to
section. The
paper/presentation
includes an
adequate
introduction and
conclusion.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The paper/presentation is
in need of additional
organization and clarity.
Ideas and/or sections of
the paper/presentation
either do not flow logically
or are in need of
fundamental improvement.
The paper is lacking an
adequate introduction
and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not Present
The
paper/presentation
lacks meaningful
organization and
the paper lacks
and introduction
and conclusion.
35 pts
Research Paper or Presentation: Final Grading Rubric |
PSCI600_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Evaluation,
Synthesis
and
Adequate
use of
Sources
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts and
ideas are evaluated
critically and
synthesized in a
manner that moves
beyond restatement
and makes a valuable
contribution to the
assigned topic.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Sources are used
correctly and
support the
paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and
ideas are
understood and
linked in a
reasonable way
that supports the
paper’s
conclusions.
Paper reflects a
good familiarity
with the major
ideas but would
benefit from
greater critical
evaluation and
syntheses.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used
but not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an
effective manner.
Paper/presentation would
benefit from more
substantive use of sources,
more appropriate reliance
on sources, and/or better
skill in evaluating,
sy ...
Healthcare Policy and Economics.docx
This assignment asks students to reflect on patient safety and satisfaction in healthcare by answering four questions in 1500-2000 words. The questions address how patient safety measures can lead to cost savings, defining the role of the Joint Commission in healthcare, reflecting on one's future role in contributing to patient safety, and the role of the chief nursing officer regarding patient safety. The assignment expects students to thoroughly address the questions using at least two scholarly references cited in APA style. It will be graded based on content, organization, logic/argument, use of references, and quality of written communication.
BUS3055 Week 1 Project RubricActivity Week 1 ProjectCou
BUS3055 Week 1 Project Rubric
Activity: Week 1 Project
Course: BUS3055-Business Law for Commercial Transactions SU01
Name: Sandra Villarreal
15 / 20
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(14–15)
15 points
Proficient (B range)
(16–17)
17 points
Exemplary (A range)
(18–20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed the facts
in one scenario
and developed
substantive
arguments and
recommendations
using legal cases
and scholarly
sources that
reflected an
understanding of
the course
material.
Did not identify the
facts or develop
substantive
arguments and
recommendations.
Unsupported with
research.
Identified facts, basic
arguments and
recommendations.
Lacked credible
research support.
Analyzed the facts
and provided detailed
arguments and
recommendations.
Sufficiently supported
with research.
Analysis of the facts,
arguments and
recommendations
was compelling and
showed well-
developed logical
progression.
Well supported by
research.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(14–15)
15 points
Proficient (B range)
(16–17)
17 points
Exemplary (A range)
(18–20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Described the facts,
arguments and
recommendations.
Weakly supported
with research.
15 / 20
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(14–15)
15 points
Proficient (B range)
(16–17)
17 points
Exemplary (A range)
(18–20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed the facts
in one scenario
and developed
substantive
arguments and
recommendations
using legal cases
and scholarly
sources that
reflected an
understanding of
the course
material.
Did not identify the
facts or develop
substantive
arguments and
recommendations.
Unsupported with
research.
basic arguments and
recommendations.
Lacked credible
research support.
Analyzed the facts
and provided detailed
arguments and
recommendations.
Sufficiently supported
with research.
Analysis of the facts,
arguments and
recommendations was
compelling and
showed well-
developed logical
progression.
Well supported by
research.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–6)
6 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(7)
7 points
Proficient (B range)
(8)
8 points
Exemplary (A range)
(9–10)
10 points
Criterion Score
Described the facts,
arguments and
recommendations.
Weakly supported
with research.
Total 38 / 50
Overall Score
8 / 10
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–6)
6 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(7)
7 points
Proficient (B range)
(8)
8 points
Exemplary (A range)
(9–10)
10 points
Criterion Score
Wrote in a clear,
concise, and
organized manner;
demonstrated
ethical scholarship
in accurate
representation
and attribution of
sources (i.e., APA);
and displayed
accurate spelling,
grammar, and
pu ...
Florida National UniversityResearch Assignment #1PurposeThe
Florida National University
Research Assignment #1Purpose
The student will read and understand the given case scenario and further develop a hypothetical project. The student will answer given questions that will serve as a guide for this project. Also, the student will explain key concepts and apply theoretical frameworks, models and/ or theories pertinent to this case.General directions
1. You will submit one (1) paper as part of this assignment (individual assignment).
2. Your research paper must follow APA format according to Publication Manual American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.). Include a cover page and headings per 6th edition APA guidelines.
3. The research paper should be minimum of 3 pages (not including the title or reference pages) – maximum of 6 pages (not including the title or reference pages), single spaced, Times New Roman, Size 12, and 5 references related to the topic (3 must be peer-reviewed journal articles).Research Paper
4. Include the following components in your research paper:
a. Title Page
b. Introduction
c. Problem Statement
d. Population of Interest
e. Key concepts such as: obesity, social determinants of health, health promotion and risk reduction, role of community health nurses.
f. Theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models
g. Planning community intervention / Funding
h. Evaluate the community-level intervention
i. Social marketing / resources
j. Research studies (at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles)
k. Conclusion
l. References Page
5. All Florida National University policies related to plagiarism must be observed.Directions and Grading Criteria: Research paper #1
Category
Points
Description
Introduction
5
The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).
Problem Statement
10
Fully describe the primary problem you are addressing as part of your potential hypothetical project. Integrate contemporary/scholarly evidence (no more than 7 years old) to support the need for change.
Population of Interest
5
Describe your population of interest.
Key
Concepts
10
1. Introduce / explain key concepts such as: obesity, social determinants of health, health promotion and risk reduction, role of community health nurses.
2. Theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models
10
Describe and apply a behavioral change model that addresses health promotion and risk reduction in this particular case (theoretical frameworks of behavioral change / models discussed on Chapter 5 of textbook).
3. Planning community intervention / Funding
10
Describe the selection of the most appropriate intervention / Describe your implementation plan. Apply collaboration / teamwork / funding. Provide explanation. Support your answer with evidence-based research literature.
4. Evaluate the community-level intervention
10
Describe your evaluation of the community-le ...
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
- Addison's disease is a disorder that was chosen to research. The key aspects that must be discussed include the pathophysiology, most common presenting symptoms, how it is diagnosed, and a standard treatment plan. National screening and treatment guidelines should also be referenced if available.
- Additional scholarly sources beyond the course materials should be used. When researching, look for unique information that may surprise the reader rather than just common facts.
- The discussion post will be evaluated based on criteria such as the quality of the initial post and peer responses, use of scholarly sources, organization, grammar and APA style.
Evaluation and Marking Scheme for Individual Assignments .docx
Evaluation and Marking Scheme for Individual Assignments
1-What is the issue, problem, event?
2-What are the causes of these problems, issues?
3-Can these issues, problems could have been solved in different ways?
4-If so, How?
Explain with a plan with supporting information collected from both online
and offline sources.
5-Is there any other similar issues, events, examples that might be used as a
comparison or yardstick with your subject?
6-What is the situation right now?
7-What are your expectations for the future?
Marking
Total
Content
Marking
100%
Ability to understand the
issues, problems, solutions
40%
Academic Research,
Discourse Skills
40%
Basic Writing
and Proper
Referencing
Skills
20%
90-100 The writer shows
outstanding
understanding
and content
knowledge.
The reader
understands the
issue
completely; if
there are any
mistakes they
do not interfere
with the
meaning.
There is a clear logical argument,
with the points well-ordered and
fully supported. It responds
appropriately to the issues with
academic search and update.
Pleasingly broad
range of sentence
structure and
vocabulary is used,
references and
subjects updated
properly and
presented in excellent
shape.
80-85 The writer
demonstrates
sound basic
knowledge and
understanding of
the relevant
area.
The reader
understands the
issue, although
some sections
need to be
investigated
more than once.
The answer responds more or less
to the issues investigated. The use
of supporting evidence, illustration
and argument is relevant but not
necessarily sufficient.
There is a good range
of sentence structure
and vocabulary with a
number of minor
errors in referencing
and updating the
subject and presented
in an acceptable
shape.
70-75 The writer does
little exhibit
adequate basic
knowledge of the
topic area.
The reader has
difficulty in
understanding
the issue,
A point of view is presented, but it
is not clear. Attempts to include
supporting evidence, illustration or
argument are made without proper
academic search.
There are noticeable
presentation errors,
these significantly
interfere with the
reader understanding
the issues
60-70 The writer does
not exhibit basic
knowledge of the
topic area
The reader has
difficulty
understanding
the issue,
although there
are little signs of
meaning
breaking
through.
The argument does not progress
smoothly. Main points and
supporting material are not clearly
distinguished from each other.
The presentation is
not properly done,
literature search is not
evident.
60-50 The writer shows
no evidence of
knowing the
relevant content.
The reader can
hardly
understand the
issue at all.
The ideas or facts presented have
little apparent relation to each
other or to the issues covered .
Errors in presentation,
structural problems,
no evidence of
literature search ...
Identifying A Clinical Question.pdf
The document provides guidelines for a student assignment to identify a clinical question related to their practice area. It instructs the student to write the clinical question in PICOT format, describe why the topic is important, perform a literature search to find 5 relevant research articles on the topic using specified databases, and identify the most relevant article to answer the clinical question. The student is to write a 1000-1500 word paper addressing these points and citing at least 5 sources using APA style.
Similar to Final Assessment Informative paper [150 Points]PoorFair.docx (14)
Introduction, Thesis Statement, and ClaimTotal 3.50Distinguis.docx
Introduction, Thesis Statement, and ClaimTotal 3.50Distinguis.docx
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
TITLE OF PAPER HERE1TITLE OF PAPER HERE3Full Title
TITLE OF PAPER HERE1TITLE OF PAPER HERE3Full Title
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
Criteria for Grading Midterm Exam A B C F Points Ea.docx
Criteria for Grading Midterm Exam A B C F Points Ea.docx
OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences
OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences
Criteria Ratings PointsContentAnalyzes theMaterial
Criteria Ratings PointsContentAnalyzes theMaterial
BUS3055 Week 1 Project RubricActivity Week 1 ProjectCou
BUS3055 Week 1 Project RubricActivity Week 1 ProjectCou
Florida National UniversityResearch Assignment #1PurposeThe
Florida National UniversityResearch Assignment #1PurposeThe
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
Evaluation and Marking Scheme for Individual Assignments .docx
Evaluation and Marking Scheme for Individual Assignments .docx
More from ssuser454af01
The following pairs of co-morbid disorders and a write 700 words .docx
The following pairs of co-morbid disorders and a write 700 words
based on your research:
Depression and substance abuse
Address
the following:
Discuss the general concept of co-morbidity.
Format
your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
.
The following is an access verification technique, listing several f.docx
The following is an access verification technique, listing several files and the access allowed for a single use.
Identify the control technique used here and for each,
explain the type of access allowed
.
a. File_1 R-E-
b. File_12 RWE
c. File_13 RW--
d. File_14 --E-
2.
. The following is an access verification technique, listing several users and the access allowed for File_13.
Identify the control technique used here and for each and
explain the type of access allowed.
Finally, describe who is included in the WORLD category.
a. User_10 --E-
b. User_14 RWED
c. User_17 RWE-
d. WORLD R---
.
The following discussion board post has to have a response. Please r.docx
The following discussion board post has to have a response. Please read the post and respond back according to the instructions attached below. Make sure to respond as instructed. Check attachment for response instruction and respond accordingly.
The instructions for the response to post is attached and highlighted.
The due date is Tuesday 5/10/2021 by 11:59 a.m. NO LATE WORK WILL BE ACCEPTED!
.
The following information has been taken from the ledger accounts of.docx
The following information has been taken from the ledger accounts of Isaac Stern Corporation
Total Income since incorporation$317,000
Total Cash Dividends pai d60,000
Total value of stock dividends distributed30,000
Gains on treasury stock transactions18,000
Unamortized discount of bonds payable32,000
Directions: Determine the current balance of retained earnings
.
The following attach files are my History Homewrok and Lecture Power.docx
The following attach files are my History Homewrok and Lecture Power Point. Please answer those questions by your own words and read the instructions carefully beofer you start writing.
Course Information:
In this course we will survey the history of technological developments from the Renaissance to the current day. We will focus on a series of technological objects—machines, tools, and systems—considering them in their broader historical (social, cultural, and political) contexts. Organized chronologically we will trace this history beginning with Leonardo Da Vinci and ending with the International Space Station. This is not, however, a teleological assessment, which assumes a progressive improvement of technology—each age has merits in its own rights.
.
The following is adapted from the work of Paul Martin Lester.In .docx
The following is adapted from the work of Paul Martin Lester.
In order to find meaning from a visual message, you need to learn a systematic way for studying images.
1.
Make an inventory list of every element in the image,
2.
Note the lighting used in the image,
3.
Note any eye contact by subjects in the image,
4.
Note the visual cues of color, form, depth, and movement,
5.
Note how the gestalt laws apply toward the composition of picture,
6.
Note any semiotic signs that are a part of the image's content, and
When you've gone through the six steps noted above, it's time to apply the six perspectives for visual analysis to the piece. Each perspective is noted below.
Personal Perspective - Gut Reaction
Rick Williams' Omniphasism (all in balance) or Personal Impact Analysis
1.
What is the picture's story?
2.
List primary words.
3.
List associative words.
4.
Select most significant associative words.
5.
Pair up primary & most significant associative words.
6.
Relate word pairs with your own feelings.
7.
Relate any inner symbolism.
8.
Write a brief story concerning personal insights.
Historical Perspective - The image's place in history
When do you think the image was made?
Is there a specific style that the image imitates?
Technical Perspective - Consider the process decisions
How was the image produced?
What techniques were employed?
Is the image of good quality?
Ethical Perspective - Moral Responsibility
Was the image maker socially responsible?
Has any person's rights been violated?
Are the needs of viewers met?
Is the picture aesthetically appealing?
Do the picture choices reflect moderation?
Is the image maker empathetic with the subject?
Can all the image choices be justified?
Does the visual message cause unjustified harm?
Cultural Perspective - Societal Impact
What is the story and the symbolism involved with the elements in the visual message?
What do they say about current cultural values?
Critical Perspective - Reasoned Opinion
What do I think of this image now that I've spent so much time looking and studying it?
Project Overview:
This week, you were introduced to six analytical perspectives for analyzing media. These perspectives form the foundation for your Media Analysis Project (MAP). Over the next three weeks, you will analyze a visual work from any media (print, film, television, Internet), of your own choosing.
Due Date:
June 5
Time Line:
·
Topic Assignment (Listed under Paper Topic)
·
June 5 Thesis and Outline (Listed in appropriate headings below)
·
June 5 Final Paper
NOTE: Thesis and Outline, and Final Paper are two separate documents.
Requirements:
Your analysis must encompass all six perspectives. This will be a detailed analysis consisting of 6-8 written pages. You must also use four credible academic sources in addition to the media itself. All sources must be cited in-text as well as on a reference page using standard APA format. Information on using .
The following article is related to deterring employee fraud within .docx
The document summarizes key findings from a report on occupational fraud. It finds that while asset misappropriation is most common, fraudulent financial statements cause the highest losses. Small businesses are most vulnerable due to lack of audits and controls. Establishing anonymous hotlines is the most effective way to reduce fraud losses, more so than audits. Fraud by executives results in highest losses and is best detected through tips rather than controls.
The Five stages of ChangeBy Thursday, June 25, 2015, respond to .docx
The Five stages of Change
By Thursday, June 25, 2015, respond to the discussion.
Discussion Question
Anthony is a 27 year old heterosexual Caucasian male. He was arrested 2 weeks ago for his second DWI and is facing a license suspension. He works as a delivery driver for a local store and after disclosing the arrest to his employer, as well as the consequences including loss of his license, he was terminated.
Anthony lives with his girlfriend of 3 years and their 2 year old son. Anthony’s drinking behavior has increased to consumption of a case of beer on Saturday and Sunday evenings each week. He consumes several beers after work during the week “to maintain.” He has also been using methamphetamines, specifically “crystal meth” several times weekly. Anthony’s girlfriend ended their relationship as a result of his increasing substance use and ongoing difficulties. Anthony feels depressed and anxious about his current life situation, especially now that he realizes that he has no job and may be homeless because of his substance use. He is also feeling down about the loss of his relationship. He researched a few outpatient treatment programs to help him stop using both alcohol and methamphetamines, but is ambivalent about entering treatment. Anthony has considered the need to stop using substances to improve his life and relationships with significant others, though fears that he will lose his friends and miss partying with them if he stops. He also fears what life will be like without the comfort of getting high.
Consider and discuss the 5 stages of change. Based upon the information provided discuss what stage Anthony is in, and provide a rationale for your decision. Next, discuss the other stages of change and what indicators we might see as Anthony progresses on through these stages. Your posting must be a minimum of 500 words.
.
The first step in understanding the behaviors that are associated wi.docx
The first step in understanding the behaviors that are associated with mental disorders is to be able to differentiate the potential symptoms of a mental disorder from the everyday fluctuations or behaviors that we observe. Read the following brief case histories.
Case Study 1:
Bob is a very intelligent, 25-year-old member of a religious organization based on Buddhism. Bob’s working for this organization has caused considerable conflict between him and his parents, who are devout Baptists. Recently, Bob has experienced acute spells of nausea and fatigue that have prevented him from working and have forced him to return home to live with his parents. Various medical tests are being conducted, but as yet, no physical causes for his problems have been found.
Case Study 2:
Mary is a 30-year-old musician who is very dedicated and successful in her work as a teacher in a local high school and as a part-time member of local musical groups. Since her marriage five years ago, which ended in divorce after six months, she has dated very few men. She often worries about her time running out for establishing a good relationship with a man, getting married, and raising a family. Her friends tell her she gets way too anxious around men, and, in general, she needs to relax a little.
Case Study 3:
Jim was vice-president of the freshmen class at a local college and played on the school’s football team. Later that year, he dropped out of these activities and gradually became more and more withdrawn from friends and family. Neglecting to shave and shower, he began to look dirty and unhealthy. He spent most of his time alone in his room and sometimes complained to his parents that he heard voices in the curtains and in the closet. In his sophomore year, he dropped out of school entirely. With increasing anxiety and agitation, he began to worry that the Nazis were plotting to kill his family and kidnap him.
Case Study 4:
Larry, a 37-year-old gay man, has lived for three years with his partner, whom he met in graduate school. Larry works as a psychologist in a large hospital. Although competent in his work, he often feels strained by the pressures of his demanding position. An added source of tension on the job is his not being out with his co-workers, and, thus, he is not able to confide in anyone or talk about his private life. Most of his leisure activities are with good friends who are also part of the local gay community.
For each case, identify the individual's behaviors that seem to be problematic for the patient.
For each case study, explain from the biological, psychological, or socio-cultural perspective your decision-making process for identifying the behaviors that may or may not have been associated with the symptoms of a mental disorder.
Based on your course and text readings, provide an explanation why you would consider some of these cases to exhibit behaviors that may be associated with problems that occur in everyday life, while others could be as.
The first one is due Sep 24 at 1100AMthe French-born Mexican jo.docx
Elena Poniatowska, a French-born Mexican journalist and author, will give a public lecture called "We Can All Be Writers" at ASU on September 24th. Students can receive extra credit by attending the full event and submitting a 250-word rhetorical analysis that identifies one thing the speaker did well and one thing not done well in reaching her audience.
On September 25th, fiction writer and poet Matt Bell will read from and discuss his work at ASU. Extra credit can be received by attending the full event and submitting a 250-word report and 500-word personal reflection on what was learned, anything surprising, and how something related to the student's personal experiences or writing.
The first part is a direct quote, copied word for word. Includ.docx
The
first part
is a
direct quote, copied word for word. Include the author's last name and the page number of the quote in parantheses. MLA format.
The
second part
of the journal entry, is
one paragraph that explains why you found the passage to be important
.
.
The final research paper should be no less than 15 pages and in APA .docx
The final research paper must be at least 15 pages long, not including the references page, follow APA format, and include visual elements like charts or pictures to support the study. Students will submit their papers through the eCourse website where a link for submissions will be provided.
The first one Description Pick a physical activity. Somethi.docx
The first one
Description: Pick a
physical activity
. Something you do all the time, or something you’ve never done before: bike riding, running, swimming, hiking, golf, playing twister, roller skating, soccer, basketball, etc. Now go and spend at least twenty minutes participating in this activity. Really do it. Engage. Explore and experience it. Pay attention to every part of your body and mind as you play/do the activity. Even if you’ve done it all your life, engage with every nuance of the activity. What do your muscles do and feel like when doing the activity? What is challenging? What is smooth and easy? What sounds to you experience? smells? Tastes? Sights? Sensations? What about your mind? Where do your thoughts go as you perform the activity? Really pay attention and discover the experience of the activity. Perform it for at least twenty minutes, mindfully paying attention to every part of the experience. Experience and notice the details. Now go home. And write about what you experienced. Detail it. Tell me about what was hard, easy, unusual, fun, new? What did you feel, taste, smell, hear, see? Take me through it beat by beat, moment by moment, nuance by nuance.
The second one
Description: Go to a busy café or diner, or some other eatery, where you can sit near TWO other people, engaged in a conversation, a dynamic interesting conversation with tenstion… where something is happening between the two people… EAVES DROP on conversations – without being obvious. Find one that has something interesting going on. Anticipate spending at least 20-30 minutes listening in to this conversation.
From this conversation, listen carefully, pay attention to what is being said, what conflict is arising, what is expressed and revealed through the language. NOW, also pay attention to the people involved. What do they look like? What is their body language? Pay attention to all the details. Do not write anything at the busy café or diner. Just listen to what is said. Watch. Pay attention to all the details.
At a later time (when you get back home)
write a letter as if you are one of the people you observed in the café. Write the letter addressing the person that they were at the café with. This can be a love letter, a complaint, an email, an apology, an explanation, etc… For this exercise to work, you must have 1) chosen a conversation to listen to where something was HAPPENING and 2) you must really have spent the time, listening in on a conversation and paying attention to the dramatic tension… something between the two people must have been witnessed, heard, experienced, by YOU the writer. If not this letter will be flat, uninteresting, and lacking conflict. Write about something you heard or observed happening between the two people, but write about it as if you are one of the people in the conversation to the other. Write about some inherent need, conflict, obstacles. The letter can be a complaint, an apology, a .
The first column suggests traditional familyschool relationships an.docx
The first column suggests traditional family/school relationships and the second identifies a more collaborative approach. Provide an example of a situation (attendance, behavior problems, academic difficulties) that could arise at school and suggest how this issue may be resolved with a collaborative approach. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings.
.
The first president that I actually remembered was Jimmy Carter. .docx
The first president that I actually remembered was Jimmy Carter. I do remember as a child Ford being mentioned, but I was certainly not engaged in his presidency. However, I remember Reagan quite well. He came to office after a major financial down turn and his policies did seem to improve things immediately. Some have said that his actions of borrowing money were a hindrance to the future. Do you feel that Reganomics was beneficial to future generations or did he just borrow from the future in order to benefit his present circumstance? Did this set precedence for future presidents to take the nation into debt in order to help their political careers? I look forward to your thoughts?
.
The final project for this course is the creation of a conceptual mo.docx
The final project for this course is the creation of a conceptual model for an integrated afterschool childhood prevention, education, or intervention program (Boys and Girls Club, for example). The program serves a wide range of age groups (ages 4 through 17) and demographic backgrounds. Students should design a program that can appropriately address the needs of the various learners. This final project should include a program foundation, program description, research proposal, and self-reflection.
The final product represents an authentic demonstration of competency because it requires students to apply classic theory in order to compose an original program based on advanced developmental principles. The project is divided into
four milestones
, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in
Modules Three, Five, Seven, and Ten.
Main Elements
1.
Program Foundation:
a narrative/essay format that will describe the main concept of the program (prevention, education, intervention) and if the program will focus on a specific topic (math, English, drugs, bullying, coping skills for stress or anxiety, peer pressure, or your choice). This foundational narrative will provide citations that link the program concept to at least two of the classical theories presented in this course (Montessori, Piaget, Vygotsky, Bandura, Bronfenbrenner). (approximately 3–4 pages)
·
What type of program will be the focus of this project? Will it be a prevention program to stop kids from using alcohol and drugs? To try and prevent bullying? Will the program be an educational model, for example, a program focused on improving educational outcomes like math, critical thinking, problem solving, science, language skills, or other? Will the program be an intervention model or a program that targets kids for problematic behaviors like truancy, acting out in class, running away, vandalism, minor theft, or underage possession of alcohol or substances?
·
Consider the critical tasks of development as laid out by the chosen theory that may help organize the approaches utilized for each age group.
2.
Program Description
: This section will provide specific descriptions of the elements (tasks, materials, activities) for the each developmental level spanning the age ranges from 4 through 17. These levels should be consistent with at least one of the two classical theories proposed in your program foundation narrative. (approximately 3–4 pages)
·
In what setting will this program be offered, for example, school setting, community center, treatment center, or a faith-based organization?
·
How will your topic differ across each developmental level?
·
How will you describe the activities, materials, and tasks that will take place in the program for each age range?
·
Are the age ranges consistent with at least one of the classic theories employed to guide this.
The finance department of a large corporation has evaluated a possib.docx
The finance department of a large corporation has evaluated a possible capital project using the NPV method, the Payback Method, and the IRR method. The analysts are puzzled, since the NPV indicated rejection, but the IRR and Payback methods both indicated acceptance. Explain why this conflicting situation might occur and what conclusions the analyst should accept, indicating the shortcomings and the advantages of each method. Assuming the data is correct, which method will most likely provide the most accurate decisions and why?
.
The Final Paper must have depth of scholarship, originality, theoret.docx
The document provides guidelines for a final paper assignment. It states that the paper must be 10-15 pages long, follow APA style guidelines, use 8-10 scholarly sources, and address specific topics related to the future of managed health care delivery systems. These topics include managed health care quality, provider contracting, cost containment, effects on Medicare and Medicaid, the future role of government regulations, and three recommendations for quality changes to Medicare and Medicaid plans. The paper must also include an abstract, introduction, conclusion, and separate reference page.
The Final exam primarily covers the areas of the hydrosphere, the bi.docx
The Final exam primarily covers the areas of the hydrosphere, the biosphere and the lithosphere. As in the Midterm, special attention should be paid to the lecture notes and the PowerPoint files, as well as the Discussion Boards. These sections are dependent on the text and the laboratory exercises, but the discussions and the lecture notes are more conducive to explanation and understanding with a essay-driven format. Additionally, the animated PowerPoints are good at achieving an understanding of processes that are in motion, especially when looking at the lithosphere, giving them more of a 3-dimensional quality.
For this final essay exam you are required to answer all five (5) of the questions. Although there is no set word limit for these essay questions, you will be graded on your knowledge of the material and the detail with which you write your answers. You should take care to cite your sources in APA format and provide full references in a Works Cited list.
Describe the paths of water through the hydrologic cycle. Explain the processes and the energy gains and losses involved in the changes of water between its 3 states. Operationally, we often most concerned with water does when it reaches the solid earth, both on the surface and in the sub-surface. Explain the relationship between the saturated zone, the water table, a ground water well and the cone of depression, all within the sub-surface.
The food chain is a valuable concept in biogeography. Give an example of a specific food chain, labeling the various levels of the food chain. After looking at characteristics of food chains, explain how a geographer’s approach to the study of organisms might be different than biologist’s study of organisms; what would each try to emphasize more than the other? What exactly is a biome? Compare/contrast the concept of the biome with that of the zoogeographic region. Compare/contrast the floral characteristics of 2 of the following biomes: Desert, Tundra, Midlatitude Grassland and Boreal Forest.
Theorize the difference in soil development in adjoining soils developed on forested, sloped area versus a grassed flat area. What are the soil-forming factors? Explain the importance of the nature of the parent material to soil formation and type. Then, cite at least 2 examples in which the influence of parent materials might be outweighed by other soil-forming factors. Explain the “struggle” between the internal and external processes in shaping the Earth’s surface. What are the different ways that the surface of the Earth is changed over time?
Describe the general sequence of events in continental drift since the time of 5 separate continents 450 million years ago. What is the difference between the older continental drift theory by Wegener and the more recent plate tectonic theory? Plate tectonics theory explains many seemingly unrelated phenomena. Explain how the patterns of volcanoes and earthquakes related to plate tectonics..
The Final Paper must be 8 pages (not including title and reference p.docx
The Final Paper must be 8 pages (not including title and reference pages) and should demonstrate an understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research, and the application of new knowledge. It must include citations and references for six to eight sources; one may be the text.
Micozzi, M. S. (2010). Fundamentals of complementary and alternative medicine. (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.
At least four must be from the ProQuest, EBSCOhost, or PubMed Central databases in the University Library, and the remaining sources must be from other scholarly or professional Internet resources.
For the Final Paper,
Complementary and alternative medicines >> (
Natural Products)
Provide a brief discussion of the protocols, and provide details of historical events that shaped the practice.
Chronic Pain
Describe the disease or condition from the CAM perspective
Include potential cultural challenges faced by the afflicted patient population as well as the practitioner.
Describe how the CAM (Natural Products) practitioner diagnoses and treats the condition.
Identify potential questions or skepticisms other health care providers and potential clientele may have regarding the CAM selected, and address the questions, supporting your responses with a minimum of two sources of research for the health condition and system chosen.
Identify and substantively describe a minimum of two other CAM practice interventions that could be suggested to assist in minimizing the impact of the illness/condition. Justify implementation of the two interventions you are recommending.
Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.
Must utilize six to eight sources; one may be the text, at least four must be from the ProQuest, EBSCOhost, or PubMed Central databases, and the remaining sources must be from other scholarly or professional Internet resources.
Must document all sources in APA style.
Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style.
.
More from ssuser454af01 (20)
The following pairs of co-morbid disorders and a write 700 words .docx
The following pairs of co-morbid disorders and a write 700 words .docx
The following is an access verification technique, listing several f.docx
The following is an access verification technique, listing several f.docx
The following discussion board post has to have a response. Please r.docx
The following discussion board post has to have a response. Please r.docx
The following information has been taken from the ledger accounts of.docx
The following information has been taken from the ledger accounts of.docx
The following attach files are my History Homewrok and Lecture Power.docx
The following attach files are my History Homewrok and Lecture Power.docx
The following is adapted from the work of Paul Martin Lester.In .docx
The following is adapted from the work of Paul Martin Lester.In .docx
The following article is related to deterring employee fraud within .docx
The following article is related to deterring employee fraud within .docx
The Five stages of ChangeBy Thursday, June 25, 2015, respond to .docx
The Five stages of ChangeBy Thursday, June 25, 2015, respond to .docx
The first step in understanding the behaviors that are associated wi.docx
The first step in understanding the behaviors that are associated wi.docx
The first one is due Sep 24 at 1100AMthe French-born Mexican jo.docx
The first one is due Sep 24 at 1100AMthe French-born Mexican jo.docx
The first part is a direct quote, copied word for word. Includ.docx
The first part is a direct quote, copied word for word. Includ.docx
The final research paper should be no less than 15 pages and in APA .docx
The final research paper should be no less than 15 pages and in APA .docx
The first one Description Pick a physical activity. Somethi.docx
The first one Description Pick a physical activity. Somethi.docx
The first column suggests traditional familyschool relationships an.docx
The first column suggests traditional familyschool relationships an.docx
The first president that I actually remembered was Jimmy Carter. .docx
The first president that I actually remembered was Jimmy Carter. .docx
The final project for this course is the creation of a conceptual mo.docx
The final project for this course is the creation of a conceptual mo.docx
The finance department of a large corporation has evaluated a possib.docx
The finance department of a large corporation has evaluated a possib.docx
The Final Paper must have depth of scholarship, originality, theoret.docx
The Final Paper must have depth of scholarship, originality, theoret.docx
The Final exam primarily covers the areas of the hydrosphere, the bi.docx
The Final exam primarily covers the areas of the hydrosphere, the bi.docx
The Final Paper must be 8 pages (not including title and reference p.docx
The Final Paper must be 8 pages (not including title and reference p.docx
Recently uploaded
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
Topic : Bed making
Subject : Nursing Foundation
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qhtvq32h4ybf9t49ku85x0n3xl4jhr15Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
Solutons Maths Escape Room Spatial .pptx
Solutions of Puzzles of Mathematics Escape Room Game in Spatial.io
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Event Link:- https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-mule-event-processing-models/
Agenda
● What is event processing in MuleSoft?
● Types of event processing models in Mule 4
● Distinction between the reactive, parallel, blocking & non-blocking processing
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shivani Yasaswi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivaniyasaswi/
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Advanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
"How to make and deliver dynamic presentations by making it more interactive to captivate your audience attention"
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/tacvl9ekroe9hqupdnjruiypvm9rdaneRecently uploaded (20)
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
Final Assessment Informative paper [150 Points]PoorFair.docx
- 1. Final Assessment: Informative paper [150 Points] Poor Fair Adequate Good Content Summary Explanation of the issue was missing major points. Poorly organized paper. Vague. No concrete depth of topic. No introduction and/or Conclusion (0-20 points) Presented either U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare government programs. Did not completely discuss successes and failures of each. Organization lacking. Does not adequately focus on the major topic. Did not use sources to support ideas.No clear introduction and/or conclusion (21-40 Points) Presented both U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare government programs and discussed successes and failures of each. Adequately organized. Paper adequately remains focused on topic. Original writing occurs most of the time. Took a position on the issue. Used sources to support ideas. Introduction/conclusion (41-60 Points) Presented both U.S. and assigned country’s healthcare government programs and discussed successes and failures of each. Well organized paper. Supported arguments or ideas with sources. Original writing Introduction/Conclusion (61-65 Points) Reasoning Knowledge No understanding of topic.
- 2. Novice thinking is evident. Unable to fluently convey major theory in writing. No clear introduction. Poor topic presentation. No significant research to support information presented. (0-20 Points) Basic understanding of topic. Vague introduction.Inconsistent writing most of the time.Less than adequate knowledge of topic and unable to fluently convey major theory in writing.Some statements made without credible research.Unclear what specifically the paper is addressing. Some evidence of basic knowledge. (21-40 Points) Adequate mastery of topic. Adequate knowledge of topic and able to fluently convey major theory in writing most of the time. Adequately addresses relevant aspects of topic. (41-60 Points Mastery of topic is evident. Good knowledge of topic and able to fluently convey major theory in writing. Completely addresses relevant aspects of topic. (61-65 Points) Composition APA Did not follow directions. More than 10 spelling, grammar or basic composition errors. Unable to follow information. APA not used; or a valid attempt was made but there were more than 10 APA errors. Effort reflects little understanding of APA. Did not Follow assignment directions. (0-9 points) Follow directions but 6-10 spelling, grammar, or basic composition errors Information difficult to follow but manageable. APA formatted; documented citations and references; 6-10 errors Limited research to support information presented. Followed a few assignment directions.
- 3. (10-14 points) Follow directions but 1-5 spelling, grammar, or basic composition errors Able to adequately follow written Information. APA formatted; documented citations and references; 1-5 errors. Adequate research to support information presented. Followed MOST assignment directions. (15-19 points) Followed directions. No composition errors. All information is well written. Information easily followed. APA formatted; documented citations and references included; no errors. Current scholarly research to support information presented. Followed ALL assignment directions. (20 points)