FEAST
2014
Mary Beth Lock
Wake Forest University
ALA Annual, Las Vegas, Nevada | June 29, 2014
ZSRenews!
And You Can Too!
Faculty Overdues: Look Familiar?
Characteristics of Faculty Loans
• Length is usually longer than any other patron group
• Generous renewal policies
• Library staff are attentive to faculty needs
• Alerts to warn them of impending due dates
• High or No upper limit to number of items borrowed
Faculty Overdues
• And yet, they happen.
Frustrations
• What Library Staff hear from Faculty
– “I have the book in my office”
– “I still need it for research”
– “Why don’t you trust me? I use the library
all the time?”
– “I never used to have to renew my books at
XYZ institution.”
Frustrations
• How library staff feel:
– Faculty ignore renewal requests
– Desire to block patron borrowing privileges
– Politically fraught
– Faculty feel a sense of entitlement
ZSRenews!
How it works
• For faculty that have more than 25 items out,
whether or not they are all “overdue”
• Library staff contacted through phone or email
• Staff members go to the faculty member’s office at a
pre-arranged time with a laptop and a barcode
scanner to check in books and check them out again
• Utilizes the university’s wireless
Publicity
• We notify faculty of the service once their fines grow
above $500. (Targeted)
• We have put info on the library’s website about the
service. (General)
• Library’s newsletter (Marketing)
• Word of mouth (Most effective)
Scalable?
• Wake Forest University is a mid-sized institution
• 4800 undergraduates
• 714 faculty on the Reynolda Campus (the one Z.
Smith Reynolds Library serves)
• Access Services staff in the library who manage
ZSRenews? One (plus one student assistant)
Problem Solved
Actual responses from our satisfaction survey to faculty.
Questions?
Contact:
Mary Beth Lock
(336) 758-6140
lockmb@wfu.edu
Director of Access Services
Z. Smith Reynolds Library
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC
Velappan Velappan
Fayetteville State
University
 Founded in 1867
 Over 6,300 students
 43 undergraduate programs
 23 master’s degree programs
 1 doctoral program
 Volumes Held (Print + Electronic) – 396,554
 Electronic Books – 84,883
 Laptops for Students – 18
 Laptops for Staff/Faculty – 5
 iPads for Students/Staff/Faculty - 7
Current Statistics (ALL)
Followers Total Posts May
2014 Posts
 Facebook 46 339 25
 Instagram 543 374 54
 Twitter 517 1464 54
 tumblr 48 323 19
 Pinterest 112 220 4
 Wordpress 47 392 10
 Total 1,313 3,112 166
 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
 2013 84 656 852 1,047 627 413 573 494 485 854 433 478 6,996
 2014 584 485 473 327 483 178 2,530
 promote Chesnutt Library, its holdings, events, and
services and resources;
 establish Chesnutt Library as a major cultural
resource for the Fayetteville State University and the
Southeastern region of North Carolina;
 increase visibility and strengthen the public image of
Charles W. Chesnutt Library;
 engage former, current, and potential users and
donors;
 engage other institutions and collections;
 highlight collection holdings and exhibits; and
 serve as a public relations tool and be part of the
overall Chesnutt Library marketing strategy.
 Any contests and special events at the library
 New books on display
 New library services
 New online databases subscribed
 Staff awards and recognitions
 Holidays and Library Closings
 FSU Authors Book List
 Special books list(MLK day, Women’s History
Month, Poet Maya Angelou, etc.,
 Laptops for Students - 18
 Laptops for Staff/Faculty - 5
 iPads for Students, Staff and Faculty - 7
 Chargers for laptops - 5
 VGA Cables - 5
 Ethernet Cables - 5
YEAR 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Door Count 201,610 202,028 221,706
(+9.74%)
223,019
(+0.59%)
Circ. Desk
Statistics
17,233 17,711 19,686
(+11.1%)
20,192
(2.6%)
Laptops
Check-out
1,196 984 2,012
(+104%)
2,101
(+4.4%)
iPads
Check-out
N/A N/A N/A 41
 Social Media Guidelines
 Monitoring
 Staffing
 Tech Savvy
 Library News Letter (Future plans)
 If we used Web 2.0 tools thoughtfully in sharing
information, are not simply the latest flashy trend, but
can have a solid educational basis
 Our users are changing along with their information
practices, and the time has come to bridge the
information gap between library experimentation and
established service
 Finally the use of Web 2.0 tools improve the library
services and enhances student learning at the
same time making connections with technologies
that are already being used for research purposes
and in daily life outside of the classroom
 Contact:
Velappan Velappan M.S., M.L.I.S.,
Head of Access Services
Charles W. Chesnutt Library
Fayetteville State University
Email: vvelappa@uncfsu.edu
Phone: 910-672-1236
Bethany Sewell &
Meghan Sooy
College of New Jersey
Erica Hardy
Agnes Scott College
Erica Hardy
Agnes Scott College
Only accepted payments by
cash or check at desk
Constantly asked by students,
parents and alumnae about
credit card payments
Received a 2012 Innovation
Grant
They funded 8 proposals from
across campus. The committee
liked this service’s enhancement
to customer service.
Business and Finance office: link accepted
credit card payments to a bank account.
ITS:
Is the Square Register’s wi-fi connection through the
iPad secure enough for our network?
External printer? Square supports many Star
Micronics receipt printers.
 Decided against. Register supports emailing or texting
receipts. This is simpler, in line with campus sustainability
efforts and we can view receipts online if needed.
Purchased a dedicated iPad, Square Reader and
a stand
Separate accounts for different categories of payment:
Accounting Overdue Fines
Library ITS
Lost or damaged items Visitor printing
Book cart sales PAW print cards
Alumnae access fees Lost media
equipment
2.75% per swipe for Visa, MasterCard,
Discover and AmEx.
3.5% + 15¢ for manually entered
transactions.
“When you price the items you sell, you are
free to incorporate any costs incurred in your
business operations. However, you cannot
itemize Square’s transaction fee in order to
pass this cost onto your customers.”
Payment categories in the Register create
room for human error
Training is needed
Account manager often has to double check the
transactions
Take payments over the phone
Stands
Erica Hardy
Agnes Scott College
ehardy@agnesscott.edu
Intermission
Tim Hackman
University of Maryland
Late Night Services at the
University of Maryland Libraries
Timothy Hackman
Head of Resource Sharing and Access Services
thackman@umd.edu
UMD Libraries Late Night Services
• McKeldin Library
• 11pm-8am, Sunday-Thursday during
Fall and Spring semesters
• Extended Friday/Saturday hours during Finals
• Campus ID required for entry
• Police Auxiliary provides
added security
• 3.5 FTE staff
~160 student hours/week
Late Night Crisis of 2008
Expanding Late Night Services
• 2012
– Expanded to all 7 floors
– Began offering circulation, equipment loan, and reserve
• 2013-2014
– Tech Desk opened overnight
– Pulling books for holds and ILL
– Open to USMAI patrons
• Next?
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
11PM 12AM 1AM 2AM 3AM 4AM 5AM 6AM 7AM
Late Night - Average Week
Spring 2014
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Challenges
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/12/18/u-of-md-s-testudo-statue-set-ablaze/
Challenges
• Safety & Security
• Supervision
• Communication
• Training
• Staffing
• Weather
• Maintenance and
housekeeping
Mary Ann Venner
University of North Texas
Moving Collections
Offsite:
Challenges and
Opportunities
Mary Ann Venner
Head of Access Services
University of North Texas Libraries
Motivating Factors
 Need for individual study space
 Need for instruction rooms
 Need for collaborative group study space
 Strong focus on e-book purchases
 University Union closed for renovations
Project Overview
 Restack remote storage facility to shelve materials by size
 Created 30% more space
 Identify materials in the collection to move to remote
storage
 Create lists of items to pull
 Process materials to move
 Shift remaining materials to create one floor for the general
collection
 Run rapid updates to change locations
 Update stacks signage
 Communicate updates to patrons and staff
 Liaisons
 Website
 Facebook and Twitter pages
Books eligible for moving
Items not
checked out in 8
years and no in
house use counts
Items never
checked out with
item records
created over 8
years ago and no
in house use
counts
185,000 items
Journals eligible for moving
Volume years
older than
2009
Titles
available
electronically
76,000
volumes
Challenges
 Timeframe
 Staffing resources
 Multiple players
 Access to materials
 What to do with available space
 Budget
 Questions from patrons
Opportunities
 Create more active learning spaces
 Group study rooms
 Instruction rooms
 Student Success Center
 Create better services for materials access
 Online holds
 Increased courier runs
 Expanded document delivery
 Faculty book delivery
 Identify cataloging errors
 Identify missing items
 Review non-circulating items
Contact Information
Mary Ann Venner
maryann.venner@unt.edu
University of North Texas Libraries
Denton, TX
www.library.unt.edu
Tom Bruno
Yale University
How to Scan ALL THE THINGS:
Scan and Deliver at Yale
Tom Bruno
Associate Director for Resource Sharing and Reserves
Yale University Library
FEAST 2014
ALA Annual Conference
Phase One: Document Delivery
• Launched September 4, 2012
• Initial participating libraries
included Sterling Memorial
Library, Center for Science and
Social Science Information,
Divinity Library, Medical
Library, Yale Law Library
• Added Library Shelving Facility
(off-site storage), Music
Library, Geology and Math
Libraries in October 2012;
Microforms in December
2012; Arts Library and Bass
Library in Summer 2013
• Over 10,000,000 eligible items
Venimus, scrutavimus, reddidimus
“We came, we scanned, we delivered!”
How it works
• Patron clicks Request Scan
link in OPAC
• Request passed from OPAC
to ILLiad via OpenURL
• Scan and Deliver requests
filled within 2 business days
(service guarantee)
• All faculty, students, and
staff eligible, as well as
alumni with paid borrowing
privileges
• Up to 2 chapters/articles
can be requested at a time
Year One Statistics
• 19,074 “born” Scan and Deliver requests in
Yale FY13 (July ‘12-July ‘13)
• 14,341 requests filled- 75% fill rate
• Top reasons for unfilled requests include
Copyright/Terms of Service Exceeded, Not On
Shelf, and Lack Volume (for periodicals)
• Patrons have option to resubmit Scan and
Deliver requests via Interlibrary Loan
Constant Assessment= Perpetual
Improvement
• At launch we embedded a
Qualtrics link into the email
delivery notification
• Commitment to keeping the
link in permanently as
ongoing
assessment/continuous
improvement
• Great rapid response for
service, quality control
issues, user-driven
enhancement requests
(e.g., direct links to PDF,
OCR)
I CAN HAZ SATISFAKSHUN?
Phase Two: E-Reserves
• In Spring 2013, Yale University
implemented Ares as its new
course reserves management
system
• Question: could we leverage
Scan and Deliver to fulfill E-
Reserves scanning requests?
• Utilized Ares OpenURL
functionality to push E-
Reserves scanning requests
out to Scan and Deliver service
• When request was filled, Ares
TN # embedded in the ILLiad
request allowed for automatic
upload back into Ares
The good, the bad and the ugly
• Success! Scan and Deliver
allowed us to process almost
2x the volume of E-Reserves in
a fraction of the time using
previous workflows
• 50% of all E-Reserves scanning
complete by 1st day of classes;
all scans complete by Week 4
• Almost all extra scan requests
came during the first few
weeks of the semester, when
little/no reliable student help
was available
Year Two Statistics
• 29,242 “born” Scan and Deliver requests in
Yale FY14 (July ‘13-July’14)
• 20,301 requests filled- 70% fill rate
• Addition of E-Reserves and eligible of high-
volume circulation collections in Bass Library
lead to increases in requests exceeding
Copyright Limits/Terms of Service and items
Not on Shelf
Phase Three: Special Scanning
• Yale’s Special Collections
dealing with more and more
patron requests for “quick
and dirty” scans thanks to
greater online
discoverability
• Digital Humanities faculty
and librarians looking for
cheaper, faster, non-vendor
solution for “research
digitization” projects
• Could Scan and Deliver take
on these special scanning
requests?
Putting The DH into the Digital
Humanities
• Spring 2014 Pilot for Research
digitization projects
• Preservation scanning “punch
work” request for Arcadia
Grant scans
• Other “scan on demand”
functions for other library
departments- e.g., scanning
old paper Privileges forms so
the originals could be
shredded
• GOAL: Utilize the latent
capacity in student scanning
hours during the semester
The Curse of the Mummy, and other
qualified failures…
• Each project turned out to be a
different kind of learning
experience
• Importance of developing reliable
request and fulfillment
infrastructure for special scanning
requests (so nothing is lost
because it goes outside the
normal workflow)
• We have the technological
capacity to produce digital
preservation-quality scans, but it
requires much greater quality
control- ideally built into the
scanning process
• Yes, there was an actual
Mummy’s curse…
DISCLAIMER: This may or may not
have actually happened
Where do we go from here?
• Formalizing the ability to push
scanning requests from Special
Collections to Scan and Deliver
(and back again)
• ILLiad-Aeon interoperability
• What do we do with all of
these scans? Questions about
dark archives, normalizing
metadata, and copyright
• Addressing the Unfilleds-
automatic routing to Rapid ILL,
other suppliers if request
cannot be filled via Scan and
Deliver
• Hoverboards???
Final Thoughts: The Simpsons On Patron
Expectations
Agnes: And you, start over. I want
everything in one bag.
Pimple Faced Kid: Yes, ma'am!
Agnes: But I don't want the bag
to be heavy.
Pimple Faced Kid: I don't think
that's possible!
Agnes: What are you, the possible
police? Just do it!
Simpson Safari, Season 12 Episode 17 (Airdate: April 1, 2001)
Homer’s ILLiad
(Beware of Greeks
bearing PDFs)
TOTALLY. WORTH. IT.
I can't imagine how this service couldbe
any better. It saved me several hours of
work, and gratification was almost
immediate. This is what we would call in
French a real "aubaine."
Questions???
bit.ly/feast14survey
FEAST 2014

FEAST 2014

  • 4.
  • 5.
    Mary Beth Lock WakeForest University
  • 6.
    ALA Annual, LasVegas, Nevada | June 29, 2014 ZSRenews! And You Can Too!
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Characteristics of FacultyLoans • Length is usually longer than any other patron group • Generous renewal policies • Library staff are attentive to faculty needs • Alerts to warn them of impending due dates • High or No upper limit to number of items borrowed
  • 9.
    Faculty Overdues • Andyet, they happen.
  • 10.
    Frustrations • What LibraryStaff hear from Faculty – “I have the book in my office” – “I still need it for research” – “Why don’t you trust me? I use the library all the time?” – “I never used to have to renew my books at XYZ institution.”
  • 11.
    Frustrations • How librarystaff feel: – Faculty ignore renewal requests – Desire to block patron borrowing privileges – Politically fraught – Faculty feel a sense of entitlement
  • 12.
  • 13.
    How it works •For faculty that have more than 25 items out, whether or not they are all “overdue” • Library staff contacted through phone or email • Staff members go to the faculty member’s office at a pre-arranged time with a laptop and a barcode scanner to check in books and check them out again • Utilizes the university’s wireless
  • 14.
    Publicity • We notifyfaculty of the service once their fines grow above $500. (Targeted) • We have put info on the library’s website about the service. (General) • Library’s newsletter (Marketing) • Word of mouth (Most effective)
  • 15.
    Scalable? • Wake ForestUniversity is a mid-sized institution • 4800 undergraduates • 714 faculty on the Reynolda Campus (the one Z. Smith Reynolds Library serves) • Access Services staff in the library who manage ZSRenews? One (plus one student assistant)
  • 16.
    Problem Solved Actual responsesfrom our satisfaction survey to faculty.
  • 17.
    Questions? Contact: Mary Beth Lock (336)758-6140 lockmb@wfu.edu Director of Access Services Z. Smith Reynolds Library Wake Forest University Winston-Salem, NC
  • 18.
  • 20.
     Founded in1867  Over 6,300 students  43 undergraduate programs  23 master’s degree programs  1 doctoral program
  • 21.
     Volumes Held(Print + Electronic) – 396,554  Electronic Books – 84,883  Laptops for Students – 18  Laptops for Staff/Faculty – 5  iPads for Students/Staff/Faculty - 7
  • 33.
    Current Statistics (ALL) FollowersTotal Posts May 2014 Posts  Facebook 46 339 25  Instagram 543 374 54  Twitter 517 1464 54  tumblr 48 323 19  Pinterest 112 220 4  Wordpress 47 392 10  Total 1,313 3,112 166
  • 34.
     Jan FebMar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total  2013 84 656 852 1,047 627 413 573 494 485 854 433 478 6,996  2014 584 485 473 327 483 178 2,530
  • 35.
     promote ChesnuttLibrary, its holdings, events, and services and resources;  establish Chesnutt Library as a major cultural resource for the Fayetteville State University and the Southeastern region of North Carolina;  increase visibility and strengthen the public image of Charles W. Chesnutt Library;  engage former, current, and potential users and donors;  engage other institutions and collections;  highlight collection holdings and exhibits; and  serve as a public relations tool and be part of the overall Chesnutt Library marketing strategy.
  • 36.
     Any contestsand special events at the library  New books on display  New library services  New online databases subscribed  Staff awards and recognitions  Holidays and Library Closings  FSU Authors Book List  Special books list(MLK day, Women’s History Month, Poet Maya Angelou, etc.,
  • 37.
     Laptops forStudents - 18  Laptops for Staff/Faculty - 5  iPads for Students, Staff and Faculty - 7  Chargers for laptops - 5  VGA Cables - 5  Ethernet Cables - 5
  • 38.
    YEAR 2010-11 2011-122012-13 2013-14 Door Count 201,610 202,028 221,706 (+9.74%) 223,019 (+0.59%) Circ. Desk Statistics 17,233 17,711 19,686 (+11.1%) 20,192 (2.6%) Laptops Check-out 1,196 984 2,012 (+104%) 2,101 (+4.4%) iPads Check-out N/A N/A N/A 41
  • 39.
     Social MediaGuidelines  Monitoring  Staffing  Tech Savvy  Library News Letter (Future plans)
  • 40.
     If weused Web 2.0 tools thoughtfully in sharing information, are not simply the latest flashy trend, but can have a solid educational basis  Our users are changing along with their information practices, and the time has come to bridge the information gap between library experimentation and established service  Finally the use of Web 2.0 tools improve the library services and enhances student learning at the same time making connections with technologies that are already being used for research purposes and in daily life outside of the classroom
  • 41.
     Contact: Velappan VelappanM.S., M.L.I.S., Head of Access Services Charles W. Chesnutt Library Fayetteville State University Email: vvelappa@uncfsu.edu Phone: 910-672-1236
  • 42.
    Bethany Sewell & MeghanSooy College of New Jersey
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 61.
    Only accepted paymentsby cash or check at desk Constantly asked by students, parents and alumnae about credit card payments Received a 2012 Innovation Grant They funded 8 proposals from across campus. The committee liked this service’s enhancement to customer service.
  • 62.
    Business and Financeoffice: link accepted credit card payments to a bank account. ITS: Is the Square Register’s wi-fi connection through the iPad secure enough for our network? External printer? Square supports many Star Micronics receipt printers.  Decided against. Register supports emailing or texting receipts. This is simpler, in line with campus sustainability efforts and we can view receipts online if needed. Purchased a dedicated iPad, Square Reader and a stand
  • 63.
    Separate accounts fordifferent categories of payment: Accounting Overdue Fines Library ITS Lost or damaged items Visitor printing Book cart sales PAW print cards Alumnae access fees Lost media equipment
  • 64.
    2.75% per swipefor Visa, MasterCard, Discover and AmEx. 3.5% + 15¢ for manually entered transactions. “When you price the items you sell, you are free to incorporate any costs incurred in your business operations. However, you cannot itemize Square’s transaction fee in order to pass this cost onto your customers.”
  • 67.
    Payment categories inthe Register create room for human error Training is needed Account manager often has to double check the transactions Take payments over the phone Stands
  • 68.
    Erica Hardy Agnes ScottCollege ehardy@agnesscott.edu
  • 69.
  • 70.
  • 71.
    Late Night Servicesat the University of Maryland Libraries Timothy Hackman Head of Resource Sharing and Access Services thackman@umd.edu
  • 72.
    UMD Libraries LateNight Services • McKeldin Library • 11pm-8am, Sunday-Thursday during Fall and Spring semesters • Extended Friday/Saturday hours during Finals • Campus ID required for entry • Police Auxiliary provides added security • 3.5 FTE staff ~160 student hours/week
  • 73.
  • 74.
    Expanding Late NightServices • 2012 – Expanded to all 7 floors – Began offering circulation, equipment loan, and reserve • 2013-2014 – Tech Desk opened overnight – Pulling books for holds and ILL – Open to USMAI patrons • Next?
  • 75.
    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 11PM 12AM 1AM2AM 3AM 4AM 5AM 6AM 7AM Late Night - Average Week Spring 2014 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
  • 76.
  • 77.
    Challenges • Safety &Security • Supervision • Communication • Training • Staffing • Weather • Maintenance and housekeeping
  • 78.
  • 79.
    Moving Collections Offsite: Challenges and Opportunities MaryAnn Venner Head of Access Services University of North Texas Libraries
  • 80.
    Motivating Factors  Needfor individual study space  Need for instruction rooms  Need for collaborative group study space  Strong focus on e-book purchases  University Union closed for renovations
  • 81.
    Project Overview  Restackremote storage facility to shelve materials by size  Created 30% more space  Identify materials in the collection to move to remote storage  Create lists of items to pull  Process materials to move  Shift remaining materials to create one floor for the general collection  Run rapid updates to change locations  Update stacks signage  Communicate updates to patrons and staff  Liaisons  Website  Facebook and Twitter pages
  • 82.
    Books eligible formoving Items not checked out in 8 years and no in house use counts Items never checked out with item records created over 8 years ago and no in house use counts 185,000 items
  • 83.
    Journals eligible formoving Volume years older than 2009 Titles available electronically 76,000 volumes
  • 84.
    Challenges  Timeframe  Staffingresources  Multiple players  Access to materials  What to do with available space  Budget  Questions from patrons
  • 85.
    Opportunities  Create moreactive learning spaces  Group study rooms  Instruction rooms  Student Success Center  Create better services for materials access  Online holds  Increased courier runs  Expanded document delivery  Faculty book delivery  Identify cataloging errors  Identify missing items  Review non-circulating items
  • 86.
    Contact Information Mary AnnVenner maryann.venner@unt.edu University of North Texas Libraries Denton, TX www.library.unt.edu
  • 87.
  • 88.
    How to ScanALL THE THINGS: Scan and Deliver at Yale Tom Bruno Associate Director for Resource Sharing and Reserves Yale University Library FEAST 2014 ALA Annual Conference
  • 89.
    Phase One: DocumentDelivery • Launched September 4, 2012 • Initial participating libraries included Sterling Memorial Library, Center for Science and Social Science Information, Divinity Library, Medical Library, Yale Law Library • Added Library Shelving Facility (off-site storage), Music Library, Geology and Math Libraries in October 2012; Microforms in December 2012; Arts Library and Bass Library in Summer 2013 • Over 10,000,000 eligible items Venimus, scrutavimus, reddidimus “We came, we scanned, we delivered!”
  • 90.
    How it works •Patron clicks Request Scan link in OPAC • Request passed from OPAC to ILLiad via OpenURL • Scan and Deliver requests filled within 2 business days (service guarantee) • All faculty, students, and staff eligible, as well as alumni with paid borrowing privileges • Up to 2 chapters/articles can be requested at a time
  • 91.
    Year One Statistics •19,074 “born” Scan and Deliver requests in Yale FY13 (July ‘12-July ‘13) • 14,341 requests filled- 75% fill rate • Top reasons for unfilled requests include Copyright/Terms of Service Exceeded, Not On Shelf, and Lack Volume (for periodicals) • Patrons have option to resubmit Scan and Deliver requests via Interlibrary Loan
  • 92.
    Constant Assessment= Perpetual Improvement •At launch we embedded a Qualtrics link into the email delivery notification • Commitment to keeping the link in permanently as ongoing assessment/continuous improvement • Great rapid response for service, quality control issues, user-driven enhancement requests (e.g., direct links to PDF, OCR)
  • 93.
    I CAN HAZSATISFAKSHUN?
  • 94.
    Phase Two: E-Reserves •In Spring 2013, Yale University implemented Ares as its new course reserves management system • Question: could we leverage Scan and Deliver to fulfill E- Reserves scanning requests? • Utilized Ares OpenURL functionality to push E- Reserves scanning requests out to Scan and Deliver service • When request was filled, Ares TN # embedded in the ILLiad request allowed for automatic upload back into Ares
  • 95.
    The good, thebad and the ugly • Success! Scan and Deliver allowed us to process almost 2x the volume of E-Reserves in a fraction of the time using previous workflows • 50% of all E-Reserves scanning complete by 1st day of classes; all scans complete by Week 4 • Almost all extra scan requests came during the first few weeks of the semester, when little/no reliable student help was available
  • 96.
    Year Two Statistics •29,242 “born” Scan and Deliver requests in Yale FY14 (July ‘13-July’14) • 20,301 requests filled- 70% fill rate • Addition of E-Reserves and eligible of high- volume circulation collections in Bass Library lead to increases in requests exceeding Copyright Limits/Terms of Service and items Not on Shelf
  • 97.
    Phase Three: SpecialScanning • Yale’s Special Collections dealing with more and more patron requests for “quick and dirty” scans thanks to greater online discoverability • Digital Humanities faculty and librarians looking for cheaper, faster, non-vendor solution for “research digitization” projects • Could Scan and Deliver take on these special scanning requests?
  • 98.
    Putting The DHinto the Digital Humanities • Spring 2014 Pilot for Research digitization projects • Preservation scanning “punch work” request for Arcadia Grant scans • Other “scan on demand” functions for other library departments- e.g., scanning old paper Privileges forms so the originals could be shredded • GOAL: Utilize the latent capacity in student scanning hours during the semester
  • 99.
    The Curse ofthe Mummy, and other qualified failures… • Each project turned out to be a different kind of learning experience • Importance of developing reliable request and fulfillment infrastructure for special scanning requests (so nothing is lost because it goes outside the normal workflow) • We have the technological capacity to produce digital preservation-quality scans, but it requires much greater quality control- ideally built into the scanning process • Yes, there was an actual Mummy’s curse… DISCLAIMER: This may or may not have actually happened
  • 100.
    Where do wego from here? • Formalizing the ability to push scanning requests from Special Collections to Scan and Deliver (and back again) • ILLiad-Aeon interoperability • What do we do with all of these scans? Questions about dark archives, normalizing metadata, and copyright • Addressing the Unfilleds- automatic routing to Rapid ILL, other suppliers if request cannot be filled via Scan and Deliver • Hoverboards???
  • 101.
    Final Thoughts: TheSimpsons On Patron Expectations Agnes: And you, start over. I want everything in one bag. Pimple Faced Kid: Yes, ma'am! Agnes: But I don't want the bag to be heavy. Pimple Faced Kid: I don't think that's possible! Agnes: What are you, the possible police? Just do it! Simpson Safari, Season 12 Episode 17 (Airdate: April 1, 2001) Homer’s ILLiad (Beware of Greeks bearing PDFs)
  • 102.
    TOTALLY. WORTH. IT. Ican't imagine how this service couldbe any better. It saved me several hours of work, and gratification was almost immediate. This is what we would call in French a real "aubaine."
  • 104.
  • 105.

Editor's Notes

  • #62 Prior to March 2013 Inspired by donuts?
  • #63 registration with Square register app was included with purchase of reader
  • #65 We do not itemize the fee, however we do pass the cost on to students. $5 print card becomes $5.14 charge. Offered at convenience of students. Haven’t had any complaints
  • #66 No increase in the amount of fines paid overall
  • #67 45% of fines and lost items were paid by credit card in the past year.
  • #68 Categories- extra work for account manager- problematic with larger colleges who will have more transactions Phone- popular with alumnae with outstanding fines or those who are trying to quickly lift their registrar holds Stands- 2nd try (1st was an order from etsy, found it unstable for our purposes). Apple came out with our current stand which has a swiper built into the stand. We find it much easier to use than the square plug in.