The session aimed to test good practices, train teachers, and introduce the ID-EYE project. It was held in Gdansk, Poland with 9 teacher participants and used the Tat, C2C, and B.E.L.S. good practices. While some teachers were hesitant about undermining their authority, others saw interactive didactics as a logical addition. The evaluation found that students were enthusiastic about the new teaching methods.

1. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the
information contained therein.
REPORT SHEET ON PILOT ACTIVITIES
FIELD THEME
Identity
PLACE, DATE, TIME OF SESSION
Gdansk, GCPU, 7.10.2014, 10:00 – 15:30
TARGET GROUP, NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
Teachers, 9 participants
Adult trainer (GCPU), 1 participant
OBJECTIVE OF THE SESSION (WHAT DID WE WANT TO ACHIEVE)
(1) Test good practices;
(2) Train trainers;
(3) Introduce the good practices of the ID-EYE project
METHODS USED (ILLUSTRATE WITH IMAGES WHEN POSSIBLE)
Tat good practice, C2C (light version) good practice, B.E.L.S. good practice
REACTIONS - OBSERVATIONS – EVALUATIONS: WHAT ADVANTAGES AND RISKS OF
THE METHOD HAVE WE FOUND?
The meeting was structured according to the B.E.L.S. good practice. The Tat good practice
was used as a part of the brainstorm session. The C2C (light version) as a support for the
interactive didactics during the meeting – and in the ID-EYE project.
The three sentences were seen as not too simple to implement because many participants felt
they might undermine their authority as teachers. Nevertheless all were open to try them
out.
Many teachers were already employing a kind of interactive didactics and the full attention
good practice was seen as a logical addition to their activities, although one that would be

2. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the
information contained therein.
difficult to sustain in a class with over 25 students.
During the evaluation (step 5) it was reported by all teachers that the didactics had resulted
in enthusiastic students.
ANY FURTHER OBSERVATIONS