Downloaded 50 times
Uploaded byStanford University
Fatal journeys (Team 621) Lessons Learned H4Dip Stanford 2016
The document discusses the urgent need to improve data collection on missing and perished refugees, highlighting the limitations of current efforts due to a lack of data sharing among humanitarian organizations. It proposes developing methods to consolidate information and identify deceased individuals through innovative solutions like a wristband system, which could provide closure for families. The initiative aims to better allocate resources and support for refugee assistance through improved data management and stakeholder engagement.
More Related Content
Similar to Fatal journeys (Team 621) Lessons Learned H4Dip Stanford 2016
More from Stanford University
Fatal journeys (Team 621) Lessons Learned H4Dip Stanford 2016
- 1. FATAL JOURNEYS i mp r o v i n g d a t a o n m i s s i n g a n d p e r i s h e d r e f u g e e s T e a m 6 2 1
- 2. MS ’17 CS AN T O N A P O S T O L A T O S MS ’17 Statistics L E N N Y B R O N N E R BS ’17 MS&E A S A D K H A L I Q MS ’17 CS Q U E N T I N P E R R O T
- 3. INTERVIEWS Improving Data onMissing and Perished Refugees US Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Policy 51% Data 19% Action 29% Lack of data on refugee flows, particularly the missing and perished, was preventing efficient policy & strategy decisions and limiting resource allocation A missing link between key stakeholders limits identification of perished refugees, preventing human & legal closure for families
- 4. WAY FINDING1 HONING DOWN2 OUR SOLUTION3NEXT STEPS4
- 5.
- 6. CENTRAL DATA STORE W AY F I N D I N G Combine on-the-ground data collected by existing organizations in Europe
- 7. LARGE NGOS HUMANITARIAN FLEET FIRSTRESPONDER NGOS COAST GUARD
- 8. LARGE NGOS HUMANITARIAN FLEET FIRSTRESPONDER NGOS COAST GUARD
- 9. LARGE NGOS HUMANITARIAN FLEET FIRSTRESPONDER NGOS COAST GUARD Data isn’t really being collected Organizations don’t have the bandwidth to do so Even if they did, they’re reluctant to share it
- 10.
- 11. Data does not exist Dataneeds to be generated
- 12. Data does not exist Dataneeds to be generated Orgs can’t know who is leaving and traveling
- 13. Data does not exist Dataneeds to be generated Orgs can’t know who is leaving and traveling Collect data from smugglers
- 14. Data does not exist Dataneeds to be generated Orgs can’t know who is leaving and traveling Collect data from smugglers “Don’t do that. Don’t work with smugglers. If you talk to them, then don’t tell anyone you talked to me about this. Just don’t do it. You will go to jail.” - One of our mentors
- 15. Data does not exist Dataneeds to be generated Orgs can’t know who is leaving and traveling Collect data from smugglers Collect data from refugees
- 16. I N SI G H T S - C E N T R A L D A T A S T O R E Detailed data on refugee movements, doesn’t really exist; so we’d need to generate it ourselves Only smugglers and refugees themselves have exact knowledge of refugee movements — so we’d need to source it there
- 17. Detailed data onrefugee movements, doesn’t really exist; so we’d need to generate it ourselves Only smugglers and refugees themselves have exact knowledge of refugee movements — so we’d need to source it there I N S I G H T S - C E N T R A L D A T A S T O R E “People arriving in Greece, everyone was using WhatsApp — the refugees, their families, the smugglers, everyone. They were always in touch.” - NGO Volunteer, Lesvos, Greece
- 18. WHATSAPP MVP W A YF I N D I N G
- 19. WHATSAPP MVP W A YF I N D I N G WhatsApp Bot Refugees use it when they’re departing Share data on who’s leaving and when Enables faster first response
- 20. Khartoum Sebha Agadez Tamanrasset Ghat Gatroun Faya-Largeau Nyala Cairo AlexandriaBenghazi Salloum Tripoli Ghadames Niamey Tazerbo Dirkou NIGERIA MALI WEST AFRICA ERITREA SOMALIA SOUTH SUDAN SUDANCHAD EGYPT LIBYA ALGERIA TUNISIA NIGER ETHIOPIA SYRIA PALESTINEZawiya Lampedusa MALTA Sicily ITALY Source:IOM, IFRC Addis Ababa N’Djamena Tunis Algiers Damascus Abuja Legend AFFECTED COUNTRY Transit/Relevant Cities Smuggling Hub Main Route Secondary Route Red Cross Hub and Lang. Sea Route
- 21. Khartoum Sebha Agadez Tamanrasset Ghat Gatroun Faya-Largeau Nyala Cairo AlexandriaBenghazi Salloum Tripoli Ghadames Niamey Tazerbo Dirkou NIGERIA MALI WEST AFRICA ERITREA SOMALIA SOUTH SUDAN SUDANCHAD EGYPT LIBYA ALGERIA TUNISIA NIGER ETHIOPIA SYRIA PALESTINEZawiya Lampedusa MALTA Sicily ITALY Source:IOM, IFRC Addis Ababa N’Djamena Tunis Algiers Damascus Abuja Legend AFFECTED COUNTRY Transit/Relevant Cities Smuggling Hub Main Route Secondary Route Red Cross Hub and Lang. Sea Route “I didn’t have a phone. I didn't talk to my family for three months.” - Samuel, Eritrean Refugee
- 22. Khartoum Sebha Agadez Tamanrasset Ghat Gatroun Faya-Largeau Nyala Cairo AlexandriaBenghazi Salloum Tripoli Ghadames Niamey Tazerbo Dirkou NIGERIA MALI WEST AFRICA ERITREA SOMALIA SOUTH SUDAN SUDANCHAD EGYPT LIBYA ALGERIA TUNISIA NIGER ETHIOPIA SYRIA PALESTINEZawiya Lampedusa MALTA Sicily ITALY Source:IOM, IFRC Addis Ababa N’Djamena Tunis Algiers Damascus Abuja Legend AFFECTED COUNTRY Transit/Relevant Cities Smuggling Hub Main Route Secondary Route Red Cross Hub and Lang. Sea Route “We had a translator, an Arabic speaker, on the boats — to help give instructions for refugees to come on board. Turned out, most of them didn’t speak any Arabic at all.” - Doctors Without Borders sea rescue
- 23. “People often lieabout where they’re from — they’re scared they’ll be denied asylum and sent back.” - Researcher in Jordan
- 24. Huge differences inlanguage, culture, resources, and norms along different refugee routes; so our solution needs to be broadly applicable Refugees are very wary of what data they share and with whom; so ideally, our solution would be as simple as possible I N S I G H T S - W H A T S A P P M V P
- 25. Generate data fromrefugees who are traveling Generate data from refugees who are traveling with minimal friction
- 26. First MMC Notes foreach Mission Model Canvas section are in the “slide notes” section Key Partners Key Activities Key Resources Value Propositions Buy-in & Support Beneficiaries/Stakeholders Deployment Mission Budget / Costs Mission Achievement / Success Factors UNHCR and on the ground NGOs for distribution and information European Governments for information, access and accreditation State Department for information and distribution Governments of safe third-party states for on-the-ground information, including the Turkish government Coast guard for some of the identification process NGOs in the water (e.g. DWB) for some identification process Hospitals/morgues for better information on missing people Key suppliers Amazon Web Servers What problem? For refugees and their families: (1) we consolidate information about missing persons across on-the-ground orgs and (2) develop means to identify perished persons. Value? This will increase the chances of finding loved ones (part 1 only) or being able to determine that an individual has perished (part 1 and 2). Asylum seekers and their families State Department European governments On-the-ground orgs collecting missing persons information (including hospitals) At-sea orgs rescuing people Access to existing resources: -missing persons databases -access to at-sea orgs Better communication and cooperation between beneficiaries and partners Existence of support for refugees Convincing stakeholders of additional benefit of working with us Buy-in to the shared information will be difficult to achieve. Instead, discover stakeholder problems and identify unique solutions enabling data collection and support Relationship with refugees will be supplied by on the ground NGOs and the UNHCR Relationship with State Department will be supplied through mentor Buy-in, support, and accreditation from European Governments Existing missing and deceased persons databases Data on migration flows and information on on- the-ground situation Data security for sensitive data Accreditation for work in Europe On the ground task force Accessible database for both entities and people, with easy information placement and retrieval Key partnerships with existing on the ground practitioners, integrating with existing practices Potential set up by European governments Indirectly achieving buy-in for adoption and data sharing by directly solving unique stakeholder problems More effective resource management, more informed decision making, and greater humanitarian advocacy among partners Not only lessen inefficiencies with data consolidation, but inform efforts in the field and ensure safer passage Metrics: # of refugees found, # of families reunified, # of deceased or missing refugees identified The budget comes from organizations that are on the ground (NGOs, UNHCR) but also from other beneficiaries such as the State Dept. and European Governments Data capture and information retrieval Opportunity cost for resources spent on potentially dead vs. living Data capture hardware, servers, initial awareness and distribution
- 27. First MMC Notes foreach Mission Model Canvas section are in the “slide notes” section Key Partners Key Activities Key Resources Value Propositions Buy-in & Support Beneficiaries/Stakeholders Deployment Mission Budget / Costs Mission Achievement / Success Factors UNHCR and on the ground NGOs for distribution and information European Governments for information, access and accreditation State Department for information and distribution Governments of safe third-party states for on-the-ground information, including the Turkish government Coast guard for some of the identification process NGOs in the water (e.g. DWB) for some identification process Hospitals/morgues for better information on missing people Key suppliers Amazon Web Servers What problem? For refugees and their families: (1) we consolidate information about missing persons across on-the-ground orgs and (2) develop means to identify perished persons. Value? This will increase the chances of finding loved ones (part 1 only) or being able to determine that an individual has perished (part 1 and 2). Asylum seekers and their families State Department European governments On-the-ground orgs collecting missing persons information (including hospitals) At-sea orgs rescuing people Access to existing resources: -missing persons databases -access to at-sea orgs Better communication and cooperation between beneficiaries and partners Existence of support for refugees Convincing stakeholders of additional benefit of working with us Buy-in to the shared information will be difficult to achieve. Instead, discover stakeholder problems and identify unique solutions enabling data collection and support Relationship with refugees will be supplied by on the ground NGOs and the UNHCR Relationship with State Department will be supplied through mentor Buy-in, support, and accreditation from European Governments Existing missing and deceased persons databases Data on migration flows and information on on- the-ground situation Data security for sensitive data Accreditation for work in Europe On the ground task force Accessible database for both entities and people, with easy information placement and retrieval Key partnerships with existing on the ground practitioners, integrating with existing practices Potential set up by European governments Indirectly achieving buy-in for adoption and data sharing by directly solving unique stakeholder problems More effective resource management, more informed decision making, and greater humanitarian advocacy among partners Not only lessen inefficiencies with data consolidation, but inform efforts in the field and ensure safer passage Metrics: # of refugees found, # of families reunified, # of deceased or missing refugees identified The budget comes from organizations that are on the ground (NGOs, UNHCR) but also from other beneficiaries such as the State Dept. and European Governments Data capture and information retrieval Opportunity cost for resources spent on potentially dead vs. living Data capture hardware, servers, initial awareness and distribution RE-EXAMINE OUR BENEFICIARIES
- 28. First MMC Notes foreach Mission Model Canvas section are in the “slide notes” section Key Partners Key Activities Key Resources Value Propositions Buy-in & Support Beneficiaries/Stakeholders Deployment Mission Budget / Costs Mission Achievement / Success Factors UNHCR and on the ground NGOs for distribution and information European Governments for information, access and accreditation State Department for information and distribution Governments of safe third-party states for on-the-ground information, including the Turkish government Coast guard for some of the identification process NGOs in the water (e.g. DWB) for some identification process Hospitals/morgues for better information on missing people Key suppliers Amazon Web Servers What problem? For refugees and their families: (1) we consolidate information about missing persons across on-the-ground orgs and (2) develop means to identify perished persons. Value? This will increase the chances of finding loved ones (part 1 only) or being able to determine that an individual has perished (part 1 and 2). Asylum seekers and their families State Department European governments On-the-ground orgs collecting missing persons information (including hospitals) At-sea orgs rescuing people Access to existing resources: -missing persons databases -access to at-sea orgs Better communication and cooperation between beneficiaries and partners Existence of support for refugees Convincing stakeholders of additional benefit of working with us Buy-in to the shared information will be difficult to achieve. Instead, discover stakeholder problems and identify unique solutions enabling data collection and support Relationship with refugees will be supplied by on the ground NGOs and the UNHCR Relationship with State Department will be supplied through mentor Buy-in, support, and accreditation from European Governments Existing missing and deceased persons databases Data on migration flows and information on on- the-ground situation Data security for sensitive data Accreditation for work in Europe On the ground task force Accessible database for both entities and people, with easy information placement and retrieval Key partnerships with existing on the ground practitioners, integrating with existing practices Potential set up by European governments Indirectly achieving buy-in for adoption and data sharing by directly solving unique stakeholder problems More effective resource management, more informed decision making, and greater humanitarian advocacy among partners Not only lessen inefficiencies with data consolidation, but inform efforts in the field and ensure safer passage Metrics: # of refugees found, # of families reunified, # of deceased or missing refugees identified The budget comes from organizations that are on the ground (NGOs, UNHCR) but also from other beneficiaries such as the State Dept. and European Governments Data capture and information retrieval Opportunity cost for resources spent on potentially dead vs. living Data capture hardware, servers, initial awareness and distribution RE-EXAMINE OUR BENEFICIARIES RE-EXAMINE OUR PROBLEM
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.
- 36. z 1990-2013: 35% of refugeebodies in Europe identified 4700+ dead refugees in the Mediterranean since the beginning of 2016 200 000 refugees and refugees crossed the Mediterranean in 2015
- 37.
- 38. “Every body cominginto Italy is being DNA tested. Many in Greece. This is expensive, and currently it isn’t getting us good results.” - MOAS Official
- 39. “These tests areuseless unless you have something to link the results back to. A point of reference.” - Head of Forensics, ICRC
- 40.
- 41. Develop link betweenthose with bodies and refugees’ families in order to provide closure — all with less friction! Generate data from refugees who are traveling with minimal friction FORENSICS AGENTS FAMILY & COMMUNITY PIVOT
- 42.
- 43. Less dependence on… Smartphones Battery Language Connectivity Trust Incentives Weneeded the lowest fidelity way to test that we had honed down correctly.
- 44. SHARPIE ON T-SHIRT H ON I N G D O W N
- 45. SHARPIE ON T-SHIRT H ON I N G D O W N Essentially, a dogtag Refugees write family member’s phone number on their shirt In case the worst happens, forensics agents receive the body Number acts as a bridge back to the family
- 46. “On a T-Shirt?Yes, I don’t mind putting this information — my name, phone numbers, it’s fine. But I don’t want to wear that if I get to Europe.” - Samuel, Eritrean Refugee
- 47. “T-shirts can fade,or come off, and they may not hold up for too long in water. The concept works, but the T-shirts may not.” - Forensics expert
- 48. T-Shirts can bedamaged or exchanged, we would need something more rigorous Writing a number on your shirt could be irreversible; and refugees don’t always want to share this information, so we need a more flexible solution to allow the refugee more control I N S I G H T S - T - S H I R T M V P
- 49. Develop link betweenthose with bodies and refugees’ families in order to provide closure
- 50.
- 51. WRISTBAND S O LU T I O N
- 52. WRISTBAND S O LU T I O N Works very similarly to the T-Shirt But much more robust - tamperproof and waterproof Offers flexibility and control to the refugee
- 53. why this worksand is good Refugee’s Home RC Chapter Embarks Perish Forensics
- 54.
- 55.
- 56. “T-Shirts can getlost, exchanged, or fade away — bracelets are much more robust.” - Forensics Expert, US Army
- 57. Khartoum Sebha Agadez Tamanrasset Ghat Gatroun Faya-Largeau Nyala Cairo AlexandriaBenghazi Salloum Tripoli Ghadames Niamey Tazerbo Dirkou NIGERIA MALI WEST AFRICA ERITREA SOMALIA SOUTH SUDAN SUDANCHAD EGYPT LIBYA ALGERIA TUNISIA NIGER ETHIOPIA SYRIA PALESTINEZawiya Lampedusa MALTA Sicily ITALY Source:IOM, IFRC Addis Ababa N’Djamena Tunis Algiers Damascus Abuja Legend AFFECTED COUNTRY Transit/Relevant Cities Smuggling Hub Main Route Secondary Route Red Cross Hub and Lang. Sea Route
- 58. z “How many braceletscan you give to us and when can you get them to us?” - Turkish Red Crescent Official
- 59. “No problems —almost all refugees get information on crossing from Facebook groups or informal networks like WhatsApp. So you can advertise there for free.” - Syrian Stringer/Fixer
- 60. DEFINING CLOSURE N E XT S T E P S
- 61. There’s more thanjust a human and emotional aspect to closure It’s also legal and logistical
- 62. We have toprove out our basic solution, and gain enough traction to make it viable
- 63.