Fast Track Arbitration Procedure, Section 29B, Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC), SIAC Rules (6th Edition, 1 August 2016) ("SIAC Rules 2016”), Emergency Arbitration, Emergency Arbitrator, Fess, Hong Kong International Arbitration Center, Expedited Procedure,
Objectives & Agenda :
To understand the procedure involved in search and seizure carried out by the Income Tax Department. To know the powers conferred onto the authorised officers during the search and seizure. To gain knowledge about the rights and duties of the assessee in the event of search and seizure. To throw some light with regards to the dos and don'ts during the search and seizure.
Pleadings in Civil Procedure Code.pptxRudra Pratap
A short and concise ppt on pleadings as described in the Code relating to the provisions to pleadings, its objectives, amendments and why amendments are allowed after filing a plaint.
Objectives & Agenda :
To understand the procedure involved in search and seizure carried out by the Income Tax Department. To know the powers conferred onto the authorised officers during the search and seizure. To gain knowledge about the rights and duties of the assessee in the event of search and seizure. To throw some light with regards to the dos and don'ts during the search and seizure.
Pleadings in Civil Procedure Code.pptxRudra Pratap
A short and concise ppt on pleadings as described in the Code relating to the provisions to pleadings, its objectives, amendments and why amendments are allowed after filing a plaint.
This file deals with the Section 60-64 of CPC,1908, which talks about the Attachment of property in execution proceedings.
I have tried to make it easier for the students to understand the concept.
In case of any query the undersigned can be reached by email, the address of which has been given in the third last slide.
These slides provide case brief of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. R Rajappa case.
The case covers:
Citation
Facts
Procedural History
Issues
Principle
Judgement
Recent Developments
• Generally speaking, qualifying words restrict or modify only the words or phrases to which they are immediately associated. They do not qualify words or phrases which are distantly or remotely located.
• In other words, in the absence of legislative intent to the contrary, preferential and qualifying words and phrases must be applied only to their immediate or last antecedent, and not to the other remote or preceding words or association of words. This rule of legal hermeneutics is commonly known as the doctrine of last antecedent.
• The maxim expressive of this rule is ad proximum antecedens fiat relatio nisi impediatur sententia or relative words refer to the nearest antecedents, unless the context otherwise requires.
the present power point presentation deals with the subject transfer of property act section 41 which talks about ostensible ownership. The ppt will be very helpful in understanding the topic and covers the relevant case laws for the same in a summarized way in 8 slides.
In exercise of the powers conferred by Article 145 of the Constitution, and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, the Supreme Court hereby makes, with the approval of the President
The ppt consists of meaning of the doctrine with example. A detailed understanding of the principle has been included along with many case laws. The essentials have been mentioned which will validate the act of parties.
In this ppt you will get all the information regarding Plaint. I tried to summaries this important topic within 10 slides. I hope you will find this informative and helpful. If something i forgot to be mentioned in slides or something you no more than that please let me know so i can also learn from you guys.
Thank you!
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF TAXATION
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
Historically, the medical device industry has been highly attractive and relatively stable. As a consequence, established players have been able to compete successfully across the device spectrum, applying common business models and processes without much need for differentiation.
The future, however, is very different as disruptive change is underway. Companies will need to look at new segments and offer end-to-end solutions to secure additional revenue and maintain their profit margins.
This file deals with the Section 60-64 of CPC,1908, which talks about the Attachment of property in execution proceedings.
I have tried to make it easier for the students to understand the concept.
In case of any query the undersigned can be reached by email, the address of which has been given in the third last slide.
These slides provide case brief of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. R Rajappa case.
The case covers:
Citation
Facts
Procedural History
Issues
Principle
Judgement
Recent Developments
• Generally speaking, qualifying words restrict or modify only the words or phrases to which they are immediately associated. They do not qualify words or phrases which are distantly or remotely located.
• In other words, in the absence of legislative intent to the contrary, preferential and qualifying words and phrases must be applied only to their immediate or last antecedent, and not to the other remote or preceding words or association of words. This rule of legal hermeneutics is commonly known as the doctrine of last antecedent.
• The maxim expressive of this rule is ad proximum antecedens fiat relatio nisi impediatur sententia or relative words refer to the nearest antecedents, unless the context otherwise requires.
the present power point presentation deals with the subject transfer of property act section 41 which talks about ostensible ownership. The ppt will be very helpful in understanding the topic and covers the relevant case laws for the same in a summarized way in 8 slides.
In exercise of the powers conferred by Article 145 of the Constitution, and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, the Supreme Court hereby makes, with the approval of the President
The ppt consists of meaning of the doctrine with example. A detailed understanding of the principle has been included along with many case laws. The essentials have been mentioned which will validate the act of parties.
In this ppt you will get all the information regarding Plaint. I tried to summaries this important topic within 10 slides. I hope you will find this informative and helpful. If something i forgot to be mentioned in slides or something you no more than that please let me know so i can also learn from you guys.
Thank you!
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF TAXATION
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
Historically, the medical device industry has been highly attractive and relatively stable. As a consequence, established players have been able to compete successfully across the device spectrum, applying common business models and processes without much need for differentiation.
The future, however, is very different as disruptive change is underway. Companies will need to look at new segments and offer end-to-end solutions to secure additional revenue and maintain their profit margins.
FDA Regulations and Medical Device Pathways to Market | Kevin Daly | Lunch & ...UCICove
About UCI Applied Innovation:
UCI Applied Innovation is a dynamic, innovative central platform for the UCI campus, entrepreneurs, inventors, the business community and investors to collaborate and move UCI research from lab to market.
About the Cove @ UCI:
To accelerate collaboration by better connecting innovation partners in Orange County, UCI Applied Innovation created the Cove, a physical, state-of-the-art hub for entrepreneurs to gather and navigate the resources available both on and off campus. The Cove is headquarters for UCI Applied Innovation, as well as houses several ecosystem partners including incubators, accelerators, angel investors, venture capitalists, mentors and legal experts.
Follow us on social media:
Facebook: @UCICove
Twitter: @UCICove
Instagram: @UCICove
LinkedIn: @UCIAppliedInnovation
For more information:
cove@uci.edu
http://innovation.uci.edu/
Shedding Some Light on the Insights Lurking in the PMA DatabaseRevital (Tali) Hirsch
May 28, 2016 marked forty years of modern day federal authority over medical devices in the U.S. Not only is this period brief in and of itself, but it’s also shorter by half compared to the duration of federal authority over pharmaceuticals, which began with the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act of 1938. In the past several years the FDA has been the target of much criticism with regards to the approval of high-risk medical devices. Some of that critique is likely merited, but it is important to keep in mind that the medical device arm of the FDA is a work-in-progress that has had considerably less time to invent itself in the larger context of history.
This paper compares and contrasts different stakeholders’ perspectives and takes a deeper dive into the data. In doing so, this paper outlines practical changes and enhancements to the PMA database that can be carried out in the immediate present to increase transparency between the FDA and Industry.
The deeper dive also identifies several potential avenues for follow-on research, including PMAs that do not reach a positive conclusion and PMAs that are sponsored by early-stage and/or inexperienced filers. Insights from such research may hold the key to longer-term regulatory process improvements within the existing framework to promote high-risk medical device innovation and shorten these devices’ time-to-market without compromising the higher standards of the domestic regulatory system or the safety of patients.
Understanding FDA Requirements Medical Devicesmarchell
The medical device market is experiencing explosive growth. Currently valued at $90 billion, market growth will continue to accelerate as demographics and market drivers increase their pressure for new and innovative product offerings.
Moreover, a substantial investment of time and resources is required to properly evaluate a new product idea and estimate its potential for success. So when a company executive declines a seemingly good product idea, what is probably being declined is the expense of properly evaluating the idea, and after having paid these expenses, the prospect of embarking on an expensive commercialization effort that has a 90 percent chance of failing.
Blockchain: A Potential Game-Changer for Life InsuranceCognizant
As a shared, secure, distributed ledger that works in a peer-to-peer environment, blockchain technology can benefit the insurance industry in numerous ways throughout the value chain. We explore several use cases, including death claims processing, to illustrate blockchain's ability to streamline cumbersome workflows, reduce errors and fraud, increase auditability and confer competitive advantage.
15 March 2016 - Law Institute of Victoria conference presentation.Andrew Downie
Here are the slides from my presentation to the 2016 Law Institute of Victoria conference 17 March 2016. The topic is "Recent Developments in Commercial Litigation: Case Law and Court Procedure".
In the past year, recent developments in Singapore have demonstrated its intention to position itself as a leading dispute resolution centre in Asia. Singapore is already widely recognised as a centre for arbitration, and the evolution of the Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC) and Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) serve to solidify its reputation, and to meet the growing demand for dispute resolution in the region. This presentation explored the complementary nature of the SIMC to arbitration through the unique Arb-Med-Arb procedure, and discussed recent importance changes made in the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) Rules in July 2016, such as on early dismissal, consolidation and joinder, expedited procedure, and emergency arbitration.
Dinesh Dhillon has acted in international arbitration for global multinational corporations in the telecommunications, airline, hotel, commodities, construction, manufacturing and projects industries. Apart from corporates, he has also represented sovereign states in international arbitration cases. He has represented clients in landmark cases before the Singapore courts relating to jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals, challenges to arbitration awards and attempts to resist enforcement of foreign arbitration awards. He is a Fellow and Vice President of The Singapore Institute of Arbitrators and Exco member of the Law Society of Singapore.
March 2018 newsletter for the adjudicator nominating body UK Adjudicators. Articles on UK and foreign adjudication cases, FIDIC 2017 and events taking place globally.
The President of India has promulgated Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 on 23.10.2015 bringing revolutionary changes i.e. no more departmental arbitrators, case to be completed within 12 months etc.
The following presentation tends to explain the concept of Summary proceedings under the Civil Procedure Code in India.It elaborates on the suits to which this order applies and the procedure to be followed therein.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
2. INDIA: FAST TRACK PROCEDURE: SECTION 29B
At any Stage either before or at the
time of appointment of Arbitral tribunal
Parties to Arbitration
Agreement
Agree with
writing
to have dispute
resolved by Fast Track
procedure
Parties May agree that arbitral tribunal shall consist of sole arbitrator
3. FOLLOWING PROCEDURE WHILE CONDUCTING
ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute on the basis of written pleadings,
documents and submissions filed by the parties without any oral hearing
arbitral tribunal shall have power to call for any further information
or clarification from the parties
If an oral hearing is held, arbitral tribunal may dispense with any technical
formalities, and adopt such procedure as deemed appropriate for expeditious
disposal of the case.
oral hearing may be held only, if, all the parties make a request or if the arbitral
tribunal considers it necessary to have oral hearing for clarifying certain issues
4. Award shall be made
Six Months from the date of
entering into reference
If award not made within 6 months, then provisions of
subsections from 3 to 9 of section 29A will apply
Fees payable and manner of payment of fees to be
agreed between arbitrator and parties
6. OFFICES
• Main office Singapore
• SIAC Mumbai Office (First overseas office in 2013) (Most successful- Generating 85
cases out of 259 cases)
– In 2014 itself, India ranked third among top foreign users.
• SIAC Seoul Office (Second overseas office in 2013)
• SIAC Shanghai Office (Third overseas office in 2016)
WHY OVERSEAS OFFICES:
• to obtain continuous feedback on services as an arbitral institution;
• to work closely with the judiciary and the governments on policy
initiatives,
• regular exchange of ideas on live issues, and legislative change, amongst
others.
7. TEXT OF RULES UNDER WHICH YOU CAN CARRY ON AN ARBITRATION AT SIAC
• SIAC SGX-DT Arbitration Rules (1st Edition, 1 July 2005)
• SIAC SGX-DC Arbitration Rules (1st Edition, 27 March 2006) are designed for
the conduct of expedited arbitration for disputes.
• SIAC Rules (3rd Edition, 1 July 2007).
• SIAC Rules (4th Edition, 1 July 2010) and
• The SIAC Rules 2016 supersede the SIAC Rules (5th Edition, 1 April 2013),
• The SIAC Rules (6th Edition, 1 August 2016) ("SIAC Rules 2016") are the
primary rules of arbitration at the SIAC and have come into force on 1 August
2016.
8. SIAC Rules (6th Edition, 1 August 2016) ("SIAC Rules 2016”)
• “Award” includes a partial, interim or final award and an award of an Emergency
Arbitrator.
• “Tribunal” includes a sole arbitrator or all the arbitrators where more than one arbitrator
is appointed.
NOTICE AND CALCULATION OF PERIODS OF TIME
• Any notice, communication or proposal shall be in writing.
• Any such notice, communication or proposal may be delivered by hand, registered post
or courier service, or transmitted by any form of electronic communication (including
electronic mail and facsimile), or delivered by any other appropriate means that provides
a record of its delivery.
• Any notice, communication or proposal shall be deemed to have been received if it is
delivered:
(i) to the addressee personally or to its authorised representative;
(ii) to the addressee’s habitual residence, place of business or designated address;
(iii) to any address agreed by the parties;
(iv) according to the practice of the parties in prior dealings;
v) if, after reasonable efforts, none of these can be found, then at the addressee’s last-known
residence or place of business.
9. Notice of Arbitration
• The Claimant shall file with the Registrar a Notice of Arbitration which shall include:
– a demand that the dispute be referred to arbitration
– the names, addresses, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers and electronic mail addresses, if
known, of the parties to the arbitration and their representatives
– a reference to the arbitration agreement invoked and a copy of the arbitration agreement;
– a reference to the contract or other instrument (e.g. Investment treaty) out of or in relation to
which the dispute arises
– a brief statement describing the nature and circumstances of the dispute, specifying the relief
claimed and, where possible, an initial quantification of the claim amount
– a statement of any matters which the parties have previously agreed
– a proposal for the number of arbitrators if not specified in the arbitration agreement
– any comment as to the applicable rules of law and as to the language of the arbitration
10. APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS / ADMISSION TO THE SIAC
PANEL OF ARBITRATORS
• Admission to the SIAC Panel of Arbitrators (“Panel”) or the SIAC IP Panel of Arbitrators
(“IP Panel”) is by invitation by the SIAC Court of Arbitration as advised by its Executive
Committee, or upon an application being made to SIAC.
• Candidates wishing to apply must demonstrate an appropriate level of expertise and
experience in international arbitration and be of good standing and character.
• Minimum qualification or experience for Panel or IP Panel:
– tertiary education
– at least 10 years post qualification experience
– a fellowship from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Singapore Institute of
Arbitrators or any comparable professional arbitration institute
– experience as an arbitrator in five or more cases
– completed at least two commercial arbitral awards
– be aged between 30 and 75 years
• Admission to the Panel/IP Panel is for a fixed term only. SIAC also reserves the
right, in its absolute discretion, to remove any person from the Panel at any time.
11. Expedited Procedure
• Following criteria is satisfied:
a. the amount in dispute does not exceed the equivalent
amount of S$6,000,000, representing the aggregate of
the claim, counterclaim and any defence of set-off;
b. the parties so agree; or
c. in cases of exceptional urgency.
• send a copy of the application to the other party and
shall notify the Registrar that it has done so, specifying
the mode of service employed and the date of service
12. PROCEDURE
The Registrar may abbreviate any time limits under these Rules;
The case shall be referred to a sole arbitrator
The Tribunal may, in consultation with the parties, decide if the dispute is to be
decided on the basis of documentary evidence only, or if a hearing is required
for the examination of any witness and expert witness as well as for any oral
argument;
The final Award shall be made within six months from the date when the Tribunal
is constituted unless, in exceptional circumstances, the Registrar extends the
time for making such final Award
The Tribunal may state the reasons upon which the final Award is based in
summary form, unless the parties have agreed that no reasons are to be
given.
13. Emergency Arbitrator
• A party that wishes to seek emergency interim relief may,
concurrent with or following the filing of a Notice of
Arbitration but prior to the constitution of the Tribunal, file
an application for emergency interim relief with the
Registrar. The party shall, at the same time as it files the
application for emergency interim relief, send a copy of the
application to all other parties.
• The application for emergency interim relief shall include:
a. the nature of the relief sought;
b. the reasons why the party is entitled to such relief
c. a statement certifying that all other parties have been
provided with a copy of the application or, if not, an
explanation of the steps taken in good faith to provide a copy
or notification to all other parties.
14. • Any application for emergency interim relief shall
be accompanied by:
– payment of the non-refundable administration fee
– and the requisite deposits under these Rules towards
the Emergency Arbitrator’s fees and expenses for
proceedings pursuant to this Schedule 1.
In appropriate cases, the Registrar may increase the
amount of the deposits requested from the party
making the application.
If the additional deposits are not paid within the time
limit set by the Registrar, the application shall be
considered as withdrawn.
15. CASE: AQZ (ALLIANCE AVIATION SERVICES LIMITED) V ARA (APPLIED RESEARCH
ASSOCIATES) ([2015] SGHC 49 )
• Dispute in question arose out of a contract formed in 2009 for the delivery
of two shipments of Indonesian coal. The purchaser commenced SIAC
proceedings in 2013 on the basis that the seller had failed to deliver the
second of these two shipments claiming US$ 852,000.
• The SIAC President directed that the proceedings should be conducted in
accordance with the expedited procedure, and appointed a sole arbitrator.
However, the parties’ agreement had not specified the expedited
procedure, and provided for an arbitration by a panel of three arbitrators.
– In the award, the seller was found liable for breach of contract and
subsequently made an application to the Singapore High Court to set
aside the award on several grounds, and in particular on the following
bases:
– First, the conduct of the arbitration was not in accordance with the
parties’ agreement because at the time of contract, the 2007 SIAC rules
applied and these made no provision for an expedited procedure.
– Second, even if the expedited procedure did apply, the composition of
the arbitral tribunal was not in accordance with the parties’ agreement,
which had expressly provided for a panel of three arbitrators instead of
one.
16. HIGH COURT DECISION
• The High Court rejected both of the seller’s arguments and held
that:
• The expedited procedure was in accordance with the parties’
agreement. There was a rebuttable presumption that the
applicable SIAC rules were those at the date of the arbitration,
not the date of contract. The parties had not made specific
reference to the 2007 rules and therefore the 2010 rules in force
at the date of commencement of arbitration applied.
• The appointment of a sole arbitrator was also in accordance with
the parties’ agreement. The 2010 rules applying under the
agreement allowed the SIAC president to appoint a sole arbitrator.
• Even if the arbitration should not have been conducted before a
sole arbitrator, the seller had failed to prove that the breach of
the arbitration agreement was serious or that it had suffered any
prejudice from the expedited procedure.
17. What Prospective Emergency Arbitrator Do?
Prospective Emergency Arbitrator shall disclose to the
Registrar any circumstances that may give rise to
justifiable doubts as to his impartiality or
independence.
Any challenge to the appointment of the Emergency
Arbitrator must be made within two days of the
communication by the Registrar to the parties of the
appointment
• May not act as an arbitrator in any future arbitration
relating to the dispute.
• within two days of his appointment, establish a schedule
for consideration of the application for emergency
interim relief
18. • schedule shall provide a reasonable opportunity for the parties to be
heard, but may provide for proceedings by telephone or video
conference or on written submissions as alternatives to a hearing in
person
• Power Emergency Arbitrator:
– to order or award
– any interim relief that he deems necessary,
• Preliminary orders that may be made pending any hearing, telephone
or video
• conference or written submissions by the parties
• shall give summary reasons for his decision in writing.
• may modify or vacate the preliminary order, the interim order or Award
for good cause.
• Emergency Arbitrator shall make his interim order or Award within 14
days from the date of his appointment unless, in exceptional
circumstances, the Registrar extends the time.
• No interim order or Award shall be made by the Emergency Arbitrator
until it has been approved by the Registrar as to its form.
22. Article 41 – Expedited Procedure
41.1 Prior to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal, a party
may apply to HKIAC in writing for the arbitration to be
conducted in accordance with Article 41.2 where:
• (a) the amount in dispute representing the aggregate of any
claim and counterclaim (or any set-off defence) does not
exceed HKD 25,000,000 (twenty five million Hong Kong
Dollars); or
(b) the parties so agree; or
(c) in cases of exceptional urgency.
• 41.2 When HKIAC, after considering the views of the parties,
grants an application made pursuant to Article 41.1, the
arbitral proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with
an Expedited Procedure based upon the foregoing provisions
of these Rules, subject to the following:
23. • the case shall be referred to a sole arbitrator, unless the
arbitration agreement provides for three arbitrators;
• if the arbitration agreement provides for three arbitrators,
HKIAC shall invite the parties to agree to refer the case to a
sole arbitrator. If the parties do not agree, the case shall be
referred to three arbitrators;
• HKIAC may shorten the time limits provided for in the
Rules, as well as any time limits that it has set;
• after the submission of the Answer to the Notice of
arbitration, the parties shall in principle be entitled to
submit one Statement of Claim and one Statement of
Defence (and Counterclaim) and, where applicable, one
Statement of Defence in reply to the Counterclaim;
• the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute on the basis
of documentary evidence only, unless it decides that it is
appropriate to hold one or more hearings;
24. EMERGENCY ARBITRATOR PROCEDURES
A party requiring Emergency Relief may, concurrent with or following
the filing of a Notice of Arbitration but prior to the constitution of the
arbitral tribunal, submit an application (the "Application") for the
appointment of an emergency arbitrator (the "Emergency
Arbitrator") to HKIAC.
Application shall include the following information
• the names and (in so far as known) the addresses, telephone and fax
numbers, and email addresses of the parties to the Application and
of their counsel
• a description of the circumstances giving rise to the Application
• a statement of the Emergency Relief sought
• reasons why the applicant needs the Emergency Relief
• any relevant agreement(s) and, in particular, the arbitration
agreement(s)
25. • Any Emergency Decision shall:
– be made in writing;
– state the date when it was made and summary
reasons upon which the Emergency Decision is based
– be signed by the Emergency Arbitrator
– The seat of the Emergency Relief proceedings shall
be Hong Kong
26. • Any Emergency Decision ceases to be binding:
– if the Emergency Arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal so
decides;
– upon the arbitral tribunal rendering a final award,
unless the arbitral tribunal expressly decides
otherwise;
– upon the withdrawal of all claims or the termination
of the arbitration before the rendering of a final
award; or
– if the arbitral tribunal is not constituted within 90
days from the date of the Emergency Decision. This
period of time may be extended by agreement of the
parties or, in appropriate circumstances, by HKIAC.