Extreme Naievette of US Policy makers about Pakistan Major Agha H Amin (Retired) Senator John Mc Cain , not a very cereberal man , and other amateur cooks and arm chair soldiers , have been passing some extremely naieve statements about US Policy dealing with Pakistan. Will sum up the fallacies and extreme naievette of US policy makers in few simple headings which will make the discussion brief and precise :-- NAIEVETTE ONE PAKISTAN DID NOT DEPLOY A SINGLE BATTALION TO INTERDICT 1500 KM OF BORDER THROUGH WHICH AFGHAN TALIBAN REPEATEDLY INFILTRATED TO LAUNCH ATTACKS ON US FORCES LEADING TO 95 % OF US CASUALTIES IN AFGHANISTAN—DESPITE THE FACT THAT PAKISTAN RECEIVED SOME 25 BILLION USD IN AID TO EXACTLY DO THIS TASK. NAIEVETTE TWO PAKISTANS SO CALLED MILITARY ACTION IN FATA HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH US OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN. WHEN US INVADED AFGHANISTAN PAKISTAN WAS ARM TWISTED BY BUSH TO JOIN US COALITION. THIS PRODUCED A CONFUSION OF PRINCIPLE IN PAKISTAN AS PAKISTANI STATE HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN USING ISLAM TO JUSTIFY PROXY WARS USING ISLAMISTS IN AFGHANISTAN AND OTHER PLACES. AS A RESULT A LOCAL PAKISTANI ISLAMIST EXTREMIST MOVEMENT KNOWN AS PAKISTANI TALIBAN EMERGED . THE PAKISTANI OPERATIONS FROM 2001 TO DATE WERE AGAINST THESE PURELY LOCAL MILITANTS WHO HARDLY ATTACKED ANY US FORCES IN AFGHANISTAN AND ATTACKED THE PAKISTANI STATE ONLY AND THAT TOO AFTER 2003 WHEN PAKISTANS MILITARY USURPER MUSHARRAF LAUNCHED A TOTALLY UNPROVOKED ATTACK IN PAKISTANS TRIBAL AREA AS PART OF A DECEPTION PLAN TO DECEIVE US GOVERNMENT WHILE HE SECRETLY PROVIDED SANCTUARY TO 95 % OF AFGHAN TALIBAN IN BALUCHISTAN PROVINCE OF PAKISTAN. NAIEVETTE THREE PAKISTANS STRATEGIC INTERESTS IN AFGHANISTAN ARE TOTALLY OPPOSED TO US INTERESTS PAKISTAN WANTS TO INSTALL A PAKISTANI PROXY GOVERNMENT IN AFGHANISTAN AND IS NOT HAPPY ABOUT US PRESENCE IN AFGHANISTAN SO NO AMOUNT OF US AID WILL CHANGE THIS BASIC STRATEGIC POSITION. PAKISTAN SEES US PRESENCE IN AFGHANISTAN AS A HANGING STRATEGIC SWORD OF DAMOCLES AGAINST ITS NUCLEAR PROGRAM. STRATEGICALLY US HAS ALREADY IRREVOCABLY LOST PAKISTAN WHICH IS ON ITS WAY TO BECOMING A CHINES SEMI AUTONOMOUS PROVINCE IN NEXT 15 TO 30 YEARS. NAIEVETTE FOUR THE STRATEGIC CENTRE OF GRAVITY WAS NOT IN FATA WHERE US LAUNCHED 99.99 % OF ITS DRONE STRIKES BUT IN PAKISTANI BALOCHISTAN WHICH US FAILED TO ATTACK AT ALL

2. Extreme Naievette of US
Policy makers about
Pakistan
Major Agha H Amin (Retired)
Senator John Mc Cain , not a very
cereberal man , and other amateur
cooks and arm chair soldiers , have
been passing some extremely naieve
statements about US Policy dealing
with Pakistan.
Will sum up the fallacies and extreme
naievette of US policy makers in few
simple headings which will make the
discussion brief and precise :--

3. NAIEVETTE ONE
PAKISTAN DID NOT DEPLOY A SINGLE
BATTALION TO INTERDICT 1500 KM
OF BORDER THROUGH WHICH
AFGHAN TALIBAN REPEATEDLY
INFILTRATED TO LAUNCH ATTACKS
ON US FORCES LEADING TO 95 % OF
US CASUALTIES IN AFGHANISTAN—
DESPITE THE FACT THAT PAKISTAN
RECEIVED SOME 25 BILLION USD IN
AID TO EXACTLY DO THIS TASK.

4. NAIEVETTE TWO
PAKISTANS SO CALLED MILITARY
ACTION IN FATA HAD NOTHING TO
DO WITH US OPERATIONS IN
AFGHANISTAN.
WHEN US INVADED AFGHANISTAN
PAKISTAN WAS ARM TWISTED BY
BUSH TO JOIN US COALITION.
THIS PRODUCED A CONFUSION OF
PRINCIPLE IN PAKISTAN AS
PAKISTANI STATE HAD PREVIOUSLY
BEEN USING ISLAM TO JUSTIFY
PROXY WARS USING ISLAMISTS IN
AFGHANISTAN AND OTHER PLACES.
AS A RESULT A LOCAL PAKISTANI
ISLAMIST EXTREMIST MOVEMENT

5. KNOWN AS PAKISTANI TALIBAN
EMERGED .

6. THE PAKISTANI OPERATIONS FROM
2001 TO DATE WERE AGAINST THESE
PURELY LOCAL MILITANTS WHO
HARDLY ATTACKED ANY US FORCES
IN AFGHANISTAN AND ATTACKED
THE PAKISTANI STATE ONLY AND
THAT TOO AFTER 2003 WHEN
PAKISTANS MILITARY USURPER
MUSHARRAF LAUNCHED A TOTALLY
UNPROVOKED ATTACK IN
PAKISTANS TRIBAL AREA AS PART
OF A DECEPTION PLAN TO DECEIVE
US GOVERNMENT WHILE HE
SECRETLY PROVIDED SANCTUARY TO
95 % OF AFGHAN TALIBAN IN
BALUCHISTAN PROVINCE OF
PAKISTAN.

10. NAIEVETTE THREE
PAKISTANS STRATEGIC INTERESTS
IN AFGHANISTAN ARE TOTALLY
OPPOSED TO US INTERESTS
PAKISTAN WANTS TO INSTALL A
PAKISTANI PROXY GOVERNMENT IN
AFGHANISTAN AND IS NOT HAPPY
ABOUT US PRESENCE IN
AFGHANISTAN SO NO AMOUNT OF US
AID WILL CHANGE THIS BASIC
STRATEGIC POSITION.
PAKISTAN SEES US PRESENCE IN
AFGHANISTAN AS A HANGING
STRATEGIC SWORD OF DAMOCLES
AGAINST ITS NUCLEAR PROGRAM.

11. STRATEGICALLY US HAS ALREADY
IRREVOCABLY LOST PAKISTAN
WHICH IS ON ITS WAY TO BECOMING
A CHINES SEMI AUTONOMOUS
PROVINCE IN NEXT 15 TO 30 YEARS.
NAIEVETTE FOUR
THE STRATEGIC CENTRE OF GRAVITY
WAS NOT IN FATA WHERE US
LAUNCHED 99.99 % OF ITS DRONE
STRIKES BUT IN PAKISTANI
BALOCHISTAN WHICH US FAILED TO

12. ATTACK AT ALL