This document contains the agenda and materials for an English writing class. The agenda includes a discussion of essay #2 and a lecture on thesis statements, outlining, using evidence, and introductions. The document also provides terms and their definitions related to sociology and oppression. It presents two opposing views in a group discussion on whether passing reinforces or disrupts social constructs of race. It concludes by having students write a working thesis and outline body paragraphs for essay #2 on whether they agree with the view that people should seize opportunities to pass for their own benefit.
Marketing Mobile - Cours IDRAC Sup' de ComLucileReynard
Cette présentation présente les différentes stratégies de marketing mobile, les secteurs où elles s'appliquent ainsi que leurs avantages et inconvénients.
Third EssayLearning to Write about DifferenceREADING .docxmeagantobias
Third Essay:
Learning to Write about Difference
READING
:
Rereading America
, from chapter five:
Parrillo, “Causes of Prejudice”
Fredrickson, “Models of American Ethnic relations: A Historical Perspective”
Harris and Carbado, “Loot or Find:
Fact or Frame?”
Kaplan, “Barack Obama:
“Miles Traveled, Miles to Go”
CONTEXT
:
Making arguments in our lives usually means persuading an audience; often it means, if it is a real argument, addressing a group that is not completely open to hearing and understanding our point of view.
This assignment will address two issues:
·
Building an argument using convincing textual evidence
·
Writing in order to persuade an unsympathetic argument
THE ASSIGNMENT
:
Chapter 5 in Rereading America addresses the history and present realities of the tensions that have surrounded, and still surround, racial and ethnic differences in the United States.
We can broaden the range of this topic to include areas of class, sexual orientation, religion, gender, and political affiliation, at the least.
Each of these categories, including race, are populated by groups we could call “others”—groups that both are seen by the majority culture as being somehow “outside” and are viewed by the majority culture with a degree of suspicion.
In a four-and-a-half to five page, double-spaced, 12-point typeface essay, argue for how some of the ideas in TWO of the essays in chapter 5 of
Rereading America
apply to ONE of these groups of “others” of your choosing. Define the group carefully. Write to an audience who would doubt the validity of your topic, the book’s texts, and your argument. If you choose to write about an “other” that is defined by race or ethnicity, be specific in naming this group (e.g., Korean, or mixed-race, or Persian).
For example, I might take the arguments in Harris and Carbado’s essay and apply them to similar thought patterns I see in Orange County about people whom the majority culture in the OC might consider “others”—those out of the cultural mainstream. Perhaps I would select French people as my group of others. I could talk about how Orange Countians see French speaking people suspiciously—people who spend too much time thinking about food. This would be a fairly silly paper, but I could nonetheless choose this topic.
IMPORTANT ADVICE
: Read all four essays and the discussion board entries on the essays. Try choosing the focus of your essay by writing about ideas from the essays that strongly affect you; don’t start out with a particular group in mind. Once you have identified interesting ideas, then think about a group of “others.”
AUDIENCE
: Each of the assigned essays from
Rereading America
for this assignment are written for audiences that likely will not agree with the respective writer’s ideas. Note the following areas in both the essays you read, and in constructing your own essays:
·
Tone—how does the writer decide to present these issues to a potentially unsympathetic a.
Bowie State University Department of English and Modern.docxAASTHA76
Bowie State University Department of English and Modern Languages
English 101 Fall 2016
ESSAY #4—PERSUASION/ARGUMENT
Essay 4 is a persuasive essay. Your goal is to present a convincing argument on one of the prescribed topics by using outside sources to support your argument. You MUSTuse the movie, Crash, as your major source.
Genre/Medium: Persuasive/Argumentative Essay—Typed
Purpose:
Unlike an editorial, the persuasive essay is not merely your personal opinion about a topic, but an argument that provides scholarly evidence of research (i.e. various sources, interviews, quotes, and sufficient statistical data) to support your position. Because of the length and complexity of this project, it is essential that you choose a topic that you really care about, one that you truly want to learn more about, and one that you will be interested in writing about.
Format:
Your seven-to-nine paragraph essay must contain a concrete closed thesis statement at the end of the first paragraph. In addition to your introduction, three supporting paragraphs and conclusion, your essay will also contain a paragraph of opposition and a paragraph of refutation. You will use MLA documentation to write your paper and we will consult with each other about your topic before the final draft is written.
Audience:
This essay will target a scholarly audience. Therefore, your language and style should meet the intellectual needs of individuals who read on a collegiate level. As you think about your audience, write to pique the interest of your audience by considering what your readers already know and what they need to know.
Stance:
For this essay, it is imperative that you take a stance and present ideas that convey your stance throughout your essay. Never contradict your thesis.
Requirements:
Although your final requirement for this project is a completed essay, you will carry out the steps for writing a research paper by participating in four separate graded activities that lead up to your final essay. Before you submit your final essay you will complete the following:
1. The Research Proposal /Thesis Statement Defense (Unit Quiz #4)
2. An Annotated Bibliography (Unit Quiz #5)
3. A Peer Review
4. Final Essay
Getting Started
Before choosing your topic you should consider what you want to write about. Once you have chosen your topic, you should decide where you stand on the issue. Next, you want to develop your position with evidence—research—that will validate your point. You will need to use at least 3 sources of support for your essay. Finally, you will present your argument in a way that convinces the reader that your perspective is a valid one. Remember, this essay, like the others you have written, should have a specific, detailed, three-point thesis statement.
Dos and Don'ts
· Don’t deviate from the topic.
· Don’t debate the obvious; go beyond the surface.
· Don’t rely strictly on your feeling ...
eflection Paper Topics with Grading RubricYou will write a 1000-.docxtoltonkendal
eflection Paper Topics with Grading Rubric
You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.
This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade.
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Learning Objectives:
Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance. Their writing should demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.
Assessment:
Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument.
Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles:
The Frivolity of Evil
How and How Not to Love Mankind
What We Have to Lose
Roads to Serfdom
Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author's main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers' insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are rather long and complex. The author likes to make extensive use of his rather copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com handy as you work your way through your chosen article. The purpose of this essay assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to discuss, analyze, and evaluate complex philosophic arguments. I am confident that the reading assignments, tests, and discussion boards will have prepared you for this final, and no doubt challenging, essay assignment.
Note: I only allow one attempt on this assignment. Students who do not fully address all of the components of the assignment as stated in the instructions as well as the grading rubric below will have to be content with the grade they earned.
Please use MLA format.
Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric:
Grading Rubric:
The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading.
1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material: The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student's independent thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one sentence) quota.
Answer each question with short answer (answers for every set of q.docxjustine1simpson78276
Answer each question with short answer (answers for every set of question located in the link)
Alexander Chapter 6
https://peacelawandjustice.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/newjimcrow-ch-1.pdf
· Describe the experience of the Jena 6: who, what, when, where. How was the case eventually adjudicated?
· By and large, what has been the attitude of the civil rights community on the War on Drugs?
· What one area of criminal justice has most been the focus of civil rights lawyers?
· Why was Rosa Parks chosen to be the symbol of courage by not giving up her seat on the bus?
· Who were Claudette Colvin and Mary Louise Smith? Why were they not chosen to represent the bus boycotters?
· Why does Alexander include these examples (Parks, Colvin, Smith) in her discussion of criminal advocacy?
· Do poverty and unemployment statistics include people behind bars?
· On what basis does Bruce Western argue that it is “pure fiction” that the Clinton years were good for African Americans?
· What is the Corrections Corporation of America?
· Besides for-profit prisons, name at least three “prison profiteers.”
· Does mass incarceration contribute substantially to lower crime rates?
· What did California’s Proposition 36 mandate?
· What is colorblindness and why is it problematic as an approach to the War on Drugs?
· What is California’s Proposition 54 (endnote #34). Did it pass or fail?
· Why does the author consider affirmative action as a “racial bribe”?
· What are the four threats to the declining circumstances of white men in the U.S.? Hint: one is NOT affirmative action.
· Does the presence of people of color as workers in the criminal justice make a difference in light of all the problems discussed in the book? Why or why not?
· Has President Obama’s administration made things worse or better? How does Alexander support this answer?
· Who said, “Look, you know, when I was a kid, I inhaled. Frequently. That was the point”?
· Which writer said to his nephew, “this is your home…do not be driven from it. …we can make America what it must become”?
Letter from a Birmingham Jail
http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
· Who is the author
· To whom was the letter directed?
· What did St. Augustine say about an unjust law?
· Who was Albert Boutwell? Bull Connor?
· Which U.S. Constitutional Amendment guarantees peaceful assembly?
Antiracist Activism
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Antiracist_Activism_for_Teachers_and_Students/White_Activists/Activists
· What is the name of Beverly Tatum’s 1997 book?
· What is Tatum’s definition of “antiracist activism” using the metaphor of the conveyor belt?
· Is there such a thing as passive antiracism? Why or why not?
· Describe who each of these antiracist activists are and what they did to end racism.
· Margaret Burnham
· Terry Davis
· Dr. Martin Nathan
· Dr. James Cameron
· Dr. Beverly Tatum
· Timothy Jacob Wise
Writing Assignment Guidelines: Love, life, and family. The prompt for the third w.
Brave New World Literary Themes Themes to ConsiderC.docxjasoninnes20
Brave New World Literary Themes
Themes to Consider:
Commodification
Freedom
Limits of Science
Mass production
Individuality
Power dynamics
Determinism/Free Will
Individual vs. Society
Identity Crisis
Loneliness
Immorality
Love & Sacrifice
Second Self vs. Doubling
The body itself has various sorts of “others” that echo and complement it.
Sometimes our speech can be more revealing than our conscious thoughts. Consider how people say, “broken up” “going to pieces” “Pull yourself together” “get a grip” “out of his mind” “beside himself” all of these are indications to, or allude to the division or existence of other selves.
Second Self vs. Doubling Cont.
Inner self: frequently suggests a twofoldness which is purely internal.
Double: often times implies a duplication of identity.
Second Self: helps us understand the difference of the self by allowing us to have a distinct first self.
Second Self vs. Doubling Cont.
When there is a second self:
The first self is on the foreground of the reader’s attention. He or she is the one that the reader tries to connect to. The second self is usually conscious of the first self’s existence. The reader usually interprets the second self as the intruder and tends to remain half-shadowed. The motivations of the second self tend to be ambiguous.
Second Self vs. Doubling Cont.
Ego is the lens through which you experience physical reality.
The superego reflects the internalization of cultural rules, mainly taught by parents applying their guidance and influence.
Id: is the unorganized part of the personality structure that contains a human's basic, instinctual drives. Id is the only component of personality that is present from birth.
Eco criticism
(This is a literary theory, not a literary theme.)
Eco criticism: the application of ecology and ecological concepts to the study of literature.
Essentially it is the study of literature and the physical environment and or nature in order to raise awareness of human interaction with the natural world.
When they say nature scholars mean: the environment before it was impacted by technology- the land its flora, its waterways, living creature, the ecosystem etc..
How does the text depict character interacting with nature? What argument is constructed as a result of this interaction or lack of interaction?
Feminist Criticism
(This is a literary theory, not a literary theme.)
Feminist Criticism: the application of a feminist lens onto a study of literature.
This school of thought studies the ways in which women are depicted or their lack of depiction in a text. How is their representation connected to patriarchal threads of power? This theory considers the objectification and subordination of women. This also studies stereotypical depictions of women and their impact on the reader.
Feminist criticism focuses on gender identity. This criticism resists the idea that men are superior to women and considers social conditioning as a the ...
COMMON WRITING STYLE PROBLEMS WHEN WRITING SCHOLARLY EXPOSITORY ESLynellBull52
COMMON WRITING STYLE PROBLEMS WHEN WRITING SCHOLARLY EXPOSITORY ESSAYS
CONTENTS
Note: items under sections III through XII are rubrics.
I. Introduction
II. Objectives
III. Thesis, and Paragraph and Sentence Structure and Logic
IV. Pronouns
V. Subjects and Verbs
VI. Quotation Marks
VII. Semicolons
VIII. Commas
IX. Numbers
X. Odds and Ends
XI. Possessives
XII. Miscellanea
For a little humor, see "Word Crimes," by Weird Al Yankovic. (Let me know if the link no longer works or if YouTube takes down the site.)
I. INTRODUCTION
A scholarly expository essay presents an argument, a thesis that is your interpretation of a topic. It develops an idea about a subject, building from a thesis statement that advances in a coherent, logical manner your opinion, conviction, evaluation, discovery, or point of view on a subject. An expository essay is similar to an editorial debate in The New York Times or the Wall Street Journal but only more high-powered and scholarly. See also the Expository Essay guide in the Work on Your Expository Essay module.
An argument, a critical analytical interpretation, is neither a violent disagreement nor an assertion. It is a statement supported by reason and evidence.
A thesis is an argument, and a thesis statement supplies an opinion and a reason or explanation for that opinion.
Discuss both your ideas AND your opponents' viewpoint(s) on your topic. Your argument in a scholarly expository essay must explore various sides of the topic. You cannot be one-sided in your scholarly expository essay.
For example, you favor abortion. In your essay, you must, however, present the anti-abortion side along with the pro-abortion side.
II. OBJECTIVES
Entries #1 through #38 are from the third edition of Writing Worth Reading (1997) by Nancy Huddleston Packer and John Timpane. Writing Worth Reading is the writing style and grammar authority that the instructor follows. Entries #39 through #45 are culled from other writing style manuals.
For writing informative and expository essays, students must learn to avoid the problems discussed under entries #5, #6, #7, #11, #12, #22, #23, #26 through #36, and #39 through #45.
Computer spell/grammar check software programs are not foolproof.
Unless stated otherwise, one point is deducted for at least one occurrence of a problem identified by the item number in the expository essay.
Use this guide along with both the Expository Essay and Endnotes guides. All three guides are located in the same module.
Caveat on quoted passages in your essay: Many of the following rules regarding writing style problems are ignored when they appear within quoted passages. If you want to indicate a correction or the correction information then one common way to rectify glaring writing style problems that appear within quoted passages is to supply the change within square brackets.
· Problem: Mary Jane said, "Everyone has their opinion of whether Spiderman is a good guy."
· Correction: Mary ...
3. TERMS LIST 2
Ableism: A pervasive system of discrimination and exclusion that
oppresses people who have mental, emotional, and physical
disabilities.
Ally: A person who supports marginalized, silenced, or less privileged
groups without actually being a member of those groups. This person
will often directly confront and challenge biphobia, homophobia,
heterosexism, racism, transphobia and other systems of oppression.
Binary Gender (Gender Binary): A system that defines and makes
room for two and only two distinct, natural and opposite genders (i.e.
male and female). These two genders are defined in opposition to
each other, such that masculinity and femininity are seen as mutually
exclusive. In this system, there is no room for any ambiguity or
intermingling of gender traits.
4. Classism: Bias based on social or economic class.
Critical Consciousness: a process of continuous self-reflection and action to
discover and uncover how we continue to be shaped by societal assumptions and
power dynamics: an essential tool to help us to recognize, understand and work to
change the social forces that shape our societies an ourselves.
Cultural Appropriation: The adoption of cultural elements not in one’s own
culture, without full knowledge of or respect for its value within the original
culture.
Cultural Oppression: Social norms, roles, rituals, language, music, and art that
reflect and reinforce the belief that one social group is superior to anther.
Dominance: The systematic attitudes and actions of prejudice, superiority, and
self- righteousness of one group (a non-target group) in relation to another (a
target group). Internalized dominance includes the inability of a group or
individual to see privilege as a member of the non-target group.
5. Group Discussion: Does Passing
Reinforce the social
construct?
Disrupt the social
construct?
6. Passing scholar, Leo Spitzer writes that passing was “by and large
a personal solution to discrimination and exclusion. It was an
action that, when accomplished successfully, generally divorced
its individual practitioners from others in the subordinated group,
and in no way challenged the ideology of racism or the system in
which it was rooted. Indeed, because individuals responding to
marginality through . . . passing could be viewed as either
conscious or unwitting accomplices in their own victimization—as
persons consenting to the continuing maintenance of existing
inequalities and exclusionary ideologies—it is certainly
understandable why they often elicited such scathing criticism
from their contemporaries” (Qtd. in Kennedy 11-12)
Reinforcement of Social Construct
7. “Passing, however, does pose at least some challenge to racist
regimes. That is why they typically try to prevent it. Fleeing
bondage by passing may have been an individualistic response
to the tyranny of slavery but it did free human beings and
helped to belie the canard that slaves were actually content
with their lot. The successful performance of “white man’s
work” by a passing Negro upset racist claims that blacks are
categorically incapable of doing such work. The extent of the
disturbance is severely limited by the practical necessity of
keeping the passing secret. But under some circumstances a
limited disturbance is about all that can be accomplished”
(Kennedy 12).
Disruption of Social Construct
9. The Prompt:
Do you agree with Pickens's position on racial
passing?
If yes, why?
If no, why not?
In his essay “Racial Segregation,” William Pickens asserts, "If passing for white will get
a fellow better accommodations on the train, better seats in the theatre, immunity
from insults in public places, and may even save his life from a mob, only idiots would
fail to seize the advantages of passing, at least occasionally if not permanently" (3)
Write an essay of four to six pages arguing for or against racial passing. Use support
from four of the texts we have read so far, our discussions, and your own insights.
Remember to format your essay in MLA style.
10. YourThesis
Your refined thesis will be your position on
racial passing: Do you agree with Pickens or
not? Why or why not? You may refer to
Pickens or not in your thesis. You may forecast
your reasons in your thesis, or you may refer
to a broader theme and provide your reasons
in the body of your essay.
11. Write aWorkingThesis
You can use these as models or examples
Racial passing is a personal decision, and people should seize the
opportunity if they can in order to defeat racism and discrimination.
Passing is a selfish act that reinforces hierarchy in society, and it should
be avoided despite the opportunities it offers the individual.
While racial passing for personal safety is a necessary and acceptable
behavior,passing in general violates community norms
and reinforces the social construct of racism.
While full time passing violates familial and
community connections and should be avoided,
the wise person will pass part time to take
advantage of the benefits it can reap, including
the opportunities to escape racism and
oppression.
12. Refer to your FREECASH chart. What are your “reasons” for agreeing or
disagreeing with the act of passing? Your reasons should connect to your thesis.
Each one should be a topic for at least one body paragraph. Some reasons will
require multiple paragraph explanations.
Consider your best support for your assertion.
This will likely be from your brainstorming
using FREECASH.
Find textual evidence to support your
position.
Explain how your examples support your
thesis.
You can also use outside sources if you would
like to, but they are not necessary for this
paper.
13. Building Body Paragraphs
Topic Sentence: This is reason #1 that you agree or disagree. This sentence
should clearly support your thesis.
Textual Evidence: This is an example from one of the texts that we read.
Explanation/Analysis: This is where you explain how your example supports
your topic sentence. You can also draw conclusion from inferences.
Other Evidence: This could be from another primary text, a
secondary text, or from your personal experience.
Explanation/Analysis: This is where you explain how your example supports
your topic sentence. You can also draw conclusion from inferences.
Transition: This section moves your reader from your first body paragraph to
your second body paragraph.
14. Introductions
You never get a second chance to make a first impression. The
opening paragraph of your paper will provide your readers with
their initial impressions of your argument, your writing style, and
the overall quality of your work. A vague, disorganized, error-filled,
off-the-wall, or boring introduction will probably create a negative
impression. On the other hand, a concise, engaging, and well-
written introduction will start your readers off thinking highly of
you, your analytical skills, your writing, and your paper.
15. Start by thinking about the
question you are trying to answer:
In his essay “Racial Segregation,” William Pickens asserts, "If passing for white
will get a fellow better accommodations on the train, better seats in the
theatre, immunity from insults in public places, and may even save his life
from a mob, only idiots would fail to seize the advantages of passing, at least
occasionally if not permanently" (3)
Write an essay of four to six pages arguing for or against racial passing. Use
support from four of the texts we have read so far, our discussions, and your
own insights. Remember to format your essay in MLA style.
Your entire essay will be a response to this question, and your introduction is
the first step toward that end. Your direct answer to the assigned question will
be your thesis, and your thesis will be included in your introduction, so it is a
good idea to use the question as a jumping off point.
16. Open with an attention grabber. Consider
these options:
• A provocative quotation: Consider a line or two from one of the texts we
read. Then give some background about passing.
• An intriguing example of passing: Provide a situation or two in which a
person might be inclined to pass.
• A puzzling scenario: Imagine a scene that makes a reader consider the
consequences or benefits of passing.
• A vivid and perhaps unexpected anecdote: Open with a short story about
a successful or failed passing attempt.
• Find common ground with your reader: Offer a contemporary example of
passing (maybe a humorous one, even) and then explain the more
reasons for passing in this earlier time period.
17. Avoid statements like "In this paper, I will argue
that racial passing destabilizes the social
construction of race and is therefore beneficial to
society."
While this sentence points toward your main
argument, it isn't especially interesting. It might be
more effective to say what you mean in a
declarative sentence: “Racial passing destabilizes
the social construction of race and is therefore
beneficial to society."
It is much more convincing to tell your readers
that than to tell them that you are going to say
that it does. Assert your main argument
confidently. After all, you can't expect your reader
to believe it if it doesn't sound like you believe it!
18. Introductions to Avoid
1. The restated question introduction: Twists the question to take up space in the
introduction.
2. The place holder introduction: Offers several vague sentences that don’t really say
much.
3. The Webster's Dictionary introduction. This introduction begins by giving the dictionary
definition of one or more of the words in the assigned question.
4. The "dawn of man" introduction. This kind of introduction generally makes broad,
sweeping statements about the relevance of this topic since the beginning of time.
5. The book report introduction. This introduction gives the name and author of the book
you are writing about, tells what the book is about, and offers other basic facts about
the book.
19. An intriguing example of
passing: Provide a situation
or two in which a person
might be inclined to pass.
A provocative quotation:
Consider a line or two from
one of the texts we read.
A puzzling scenario: Imagine
a scene that makes a reader
consider the consequences
or benefits of passing.
A vivid and perhaps
unexpected anecdote: Open
with a short story about a
successful or failed passing
attempt.
Find common ground with
your reader: Offer a
contemporary example of
passing (maybe a humorous
one, even) and then explain
the more reasons for passing
in this earlier time period.
Let’s Try to Write an Introduction or Two
20. Possible Outline
Introduction:
Thesis: This will likely be near the end of your introduction
Multiple Body Paragraphs supporting your thesis: The topic sentences of your body paragraphs
(probably situated fairly early in the paragraph) should connect directly to your thesis. You should use the
following rhetorical strategies to support your topic sentence:
define (describe and/or characterize unfamiliar terms, situations, or events)
classify (briefly distinguish between types: full time versus part time or kinds of passing)
exemplify (provide examples from primary or secondary texts)
analyze (explore and/or evaluate, particularly in terms of the connections of the
examples to your reasons or thesis)
explain (give details about) the connection between your example and your assertions.
conclude (provide a logical conclusion for your readers)
Transition (prepare your reader for the next paragraph.
Counter Argument: Anticipate your readers questions or doubts. We will discuss this in our next class.
Conclusion: We will discuss this in our next class.
21. Writing
Sketch out a rough outline.
Intro: What kind?
Thesis: Write out a working thesis or your refined thesis
Body 1: One of your strongest arguments supporting your thesis.
support/example
Body 2: A second paragraph explaining your first reason.
Body 3: Another reason
support/example
Body 3: Another reason
support/example
Body 4:One of your strongest arguments supporting your thesis.
support/example
Body and so on!
Counterargument:
Conclusion:
22. HOMEWORK
Read: Begin Stone Butch Blues (pages 1-65)
Post #10: Post Draft: Introduction, Thesis, at least
three body paragraphs (with topic sentences,
cited evidence, and explanation)
Study: Vocab/Terms