SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 48
Download to read offline
Esempio di struttura
soggetta a incendio: hangar
Prof. Ing. Franco Bontempi
Ordinario di Tecnica delle Costruzioni
Facolta’ di Ingegneria Civile e Industriale
Universita’ degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”
franco.bontempi@uniroma1.it
3.6.1.5.4. Verifiche di resistenza
2
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Mechanical Analysis
• The mechanical analysis shall be performed for
the same duration as used in the temperature
analysis.
• Verification of fire resistance should be in:
– in the strength domain: Rfi,d,t ≥ Efi,requ,t
(resistance at time t ≥ load effects at time t);
– in the time domain: tfi,d ≥ tfi,requ
(design value of time fire resistance ≥ time required)
– In the temperature domain: Td ≤ Tcr
(design value of the material temperature ≤ critical
material temperature);
3
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Verification of fire resistance (3D)
R = structural resistance
T = temperature
t = time
T=T(t)
R=R(t,T)=R(t,T(t))=R(t)
4
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Verification of fire resistance (R-safe)
R = structural resistance
T = temperature
t = time
Rfi,d,t
Efi,requ,t
5
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Verification of fire resistance (R-fail)
R = structural resistance
T = temperature
t = time
Efi,requ,t
Rfi,d,t
Failure !
6
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Verification of fire resistance (t)
R = structural resistance
T = temperature
t = time
Efi,requ,t
Rfi,d,t
Failure !
tfi,d ≥ tfi,requ
7
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
R60 945 ̊C
R30 842 ̊C
R15 739 ̊C R60 945 ̊C
R30 842 ̊C
R15 739 ̊C R90 1006 ̊C
Time [min]
R120 1049 ̊C
8
Standard (Conventional) Fire: ISO 834
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
R = structural resistance
T = temperature
t = time
Efi,requ,t
Rfi,d,t
Failure !
Td ≤ Tcr
9
Verification of fire resistance (T)
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
32,85 m
65,64
m
Vista A-A
Vista B-B
C
C
Vista A-A
Vista B-B
Sezione C-C
32,82 m 32,82 m
7,00 m
12,82
m
9,02
m
16,425 m
Geometry
10
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
11
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Structural modelling (1)
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 12
Structural modelling (2)
13
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Performance goal
1 2 3
4
- ….
- ….
- Structural strength for 20 minutes
- ….
- ….
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 14
FIRE MODEL
HEAT TRANSFER
MODEL
STRUCTURAL
MODEL
Fire thermal exposure
Thermal gradients
Load capacity
Room geometry,
Fuel load,
Fire characteristics
Element geometry,
Thermal properties,
Heat transfer coefficients
Element geometry,
Applied loads,
Mechanical properties
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 15
Fire modeling: conventional
Curva standard ISO 834
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
t (sec)
T
(°C)
7,00 m
6,54m
Fire zone size : 45,8 m2
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 16
Constitutive law for steel
Tensioni-Deformazioni al variare della Temperatura
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
0 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,1 0,12 0,14 0,16 0,18 0,2
Deformazioni (%)
Tensioni
(KN/m
2
)
1100°C
1000°C
900°C
800°C
700°C
600°C
500°C
400°C
300°C
200°C
100°C
Fattori riduttivi delle caratteristiche meccaniche
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
T (°C)
Fattori
riduttivi
Ky,T
Kp,T
K E,T
T (°C) E (Pa) σy (Pa) α (1/°C)
0 210000000000 235000000 0,00001170
20 210000000000 235000000 0,00001170
100 210000000000 235000000 0,00001195
200 189000000000 232884193 0,00001227
300 168000000000 230689179 0,00001258
400 147000000000 228405976 0,00001297
500 126000000000 178561976 0,00001313
600 65100000000 107131683 0,00001338
700 27300000000 52248249 0,00001360
800 18900000000 25174565 0,00001382
900 14175000000 13851676 0,00001401
1000 9450000000 9234450,5 0,00001419
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 17
2° Scenario
3° Scenario
1° Scenario
Definition of scenarios
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 18
7,00 m
6,54 m
1st Scenario
19
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
20
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
1st
21
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
1st
22
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
1st
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 23
1st - lateral displacements
24
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
1st - vertical displacements
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 25
7,00 m
2nd Scenario
26
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
27
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
2nd
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 28
2nd – vertical displacements
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 29
3rd Scenario
30
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
3rd
31
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
3rd
32
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
3rd – vertical displacements
33
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
3rd – lateral displacements
34
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
RESULTS SYNTHESIS
Confronti spostamenti laterali Y
-2,50E-01
-2,00E-01
-1,50E-01
-1,00E-01
-5,00E-02
0,00E+00
5,00E-02
1,00E-01
1,50E-01
2,00E-01
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Tempo (sec)
Spostamenti
laterali
(m)
Scenaio 3 Scenario 1
35
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
FIRE MODEL
HEAT TRANSFER
MODEL
STRUCTURAL
MODEL
Fire thermal exposure
Thermal gradients
Load capacity
Room geometry,
Fuel load,
Fire characteristics
Element geometry,
Thermal properties,
Heat transfer coefficients
Element geometry,
Applied loads,
Mechanical properties
36
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
FINITE ELEMENT MODELING
FINITE VOLUME MODELING
FIRE SIMULATION
STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE
37
Fire modeling: explicit
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
REAL OBJECT
MODEL
38
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
1°Case : NO OPENING
2°Case : OPENING OF THE DOORS AFTER 5 MINUTES DUE
TO FIREFIGTHERS ARRIVE
3°Case : DOORS ALWAYS OPEN
SYSTEM SCENARIOS
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 39
1
2
2
3 3
4
1
2
2
3 3
4
Structure / Action Interaction
Discretization for structural modeling Discretization for action modeling
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 40
41
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
2°Case : OPENING OF THE DOORS AFER 5 MINUTES
VENT FIRES
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 42
43
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 44
Ceiling Jet
45
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Confronto Zona 1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
t(sec)
T(°C)
1° Caso: Ambiente chiuso
2°Caso: Arrivo VVF 5min
3° Caso: Ambiente aperto
1
2
2
3 3
4
1°Case : NO OPENING
2°Case : DOORS OPEN AFTER 5 MNUTES
3°Case : DOORS ALWAYS OPEN
Scenarios Temperatures
46
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
t(sec)
T(°C)
ELICOTTERO
CURVA ISO834
CURVA IDROCARBURI
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
t(sec)
T(°C)
CURVA ISO834
CURVA IDROCARBURI
47
08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
Esempio di struttura
soggetta a incendio: hangar
Prof. Ing. Franco Bontempi
Ordinario di Tecnica delle Costruzioni
Facolta’ di Ingegneria Civile e Industriale
Universita’ degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”
franco.bontempi@uniroma1.it

More Related Content

Similar to Esempio di struttura soggetta a incendio: hangar

Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
iaemedu
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
iaemedu
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
IAEME Publication
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
iaemedu
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
IAEME Publication
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution
Model for prediction of temperature distributionModel for prediction of temperature distribution
Model for prediction of temperature distribution
iaemedu
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
IAEME Publication
 
Gas Turbine Nuclear Power Plants
Gas Turbine Nuclear Power PlantsGas Turbine Nuclear Power Plants
Gas Turbine Nuclear Power Plants
Adam Doligalski
 
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureFire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Arshia Mousavi
 

Similar to Esempio di struttura soggetta a incendio: hangar (20)

FIRE RESISTANT ANALYSIS OF RC BEAM COLUMN JOINT
FIRE RESISTANT ANALYSIS OF RC BEAM COLUMN JOINTFIRE RESISTANT ANALYSIS OF RC BEAM COLUMN JOINT
FIRE RESISTANT ANALYSIS OF RC BEAM COLUMN JOINT
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution
Model for prediction of temperature distributionModel for prediction of temperature distribution
Model for prediction of temperature distribution
 
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
Model for prediction of temperature distribution in workpiece for surface gri...
 
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Modelling of Fire Scenario
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Modelling of Fire ScenarioFire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Modelling of Fire Scenario
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Modelling of Fire Scenario
 
STUDY THE WORKING STRESS METHOD AND LIMIT STATE METHOD AND IN RCC CHIMNEY DESIGN
STUDY THE WORKING STRESS METHOD AND LIMIT STATE METHOD AND IN RCC CHIMNEY DESIGNSTUDY THE WORKING STRESS METHOD AND LIMIT STATE METHOD AND IN RCC CHIMNEY DESIGN
STUDY THE WORKING STRESS METHOD AND LIMIT STATE METHOD AND IN RCC CHIMNEY DESIGN
 
Residual fire resistance of steel frames assessed using a multi-hazard analys...
Residual fire resistance of steel frames assessed using a multi-hazard analys...Residual fire resistance of steel frames assessed using a multi-hazard analys...
Residual fire resistance of steel frames assessed using a multi-hazard analys...
 
Gas Turbine Nuclear Power Plants
Gas Turbine Nuclear Power PlantsGas Turbine Nuclear Power Plants
Gas Turbine Nuclear Power Plants
 
Geometric regeneration and mechanical analysis of a gas turbine blade type Fr...
Geometric regeneration and mechanical analysis of a gas turbine blade type Fr...Geometric regeneration and mechanical analysis of a gas turbine blade type Fr...
Geometric regeneration and mechanical analysis of a gas turbine blade type Fr...
 
Approccio sistemico per la sicurezza delle gallerie in caso di incendio e pro...
Approccio sistemico per la sicurezza delle gallerie in caso di incendio e pro...Approccio sistemico per la sicurezza delle gallerie in caso di incendio e pro...
Approccio sistemico per la sicurezza delle gallerie in caso di incendio e pro...
 
Finite element modeling for maximum temperature in friction stir welding of a...
Finite element modeling for maximum temperature in friction stir welding of a...Finite element modeling for maximum temperature in friction stir welding of a...
Finite element modeling for maximum temperature in friction stir welding of a...
 
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureFire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
 
Art20182050
Art20182050Art20182050
Art20182050
 
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...
 
present95
present95present95
present95
 
TINCE2016 - Steel reinforcement calculations in RC members with account of te...
TINCE2016 - Steel reinforcement calculations in RC members with account of te...TINCE2016 - Steel reinforcement calculations in RC members with account of te...
TINCE2016 - Steel reinforcement calculations in RC members with account of te...
 

More from Franco Bontempi

La realtà dei ponti e dei viadotti: controllo e manutenzione
La realtà dei ponti e dei viadotti: controllo e manutenzioneLa realtà dei ponti e dei viadotti: controllo e manutenzione
La realtà dei ponti e dei viadotti: controllo e manutenzione
Franco Bontempi
 

More from Franco Bontempi (20)

84-91 UNI RM - Bontempi REV.pdf
84-91 UNI RM - Bontempi REV.pdf84-91 UNI RM - Bontempi REV.pdf
84-91 UNI RM - Bontempi REV.pdf
 
PGS - lezione 63 - robustness.pdf
PGS - lezione 63 - robustness.pdfPGS - lezione 63 - robustness.pdf
PGS - lezione 63 - robustness.pdf
 
PGS - lezione 60 - evidences of failures.pdf
PGS - lezione 60 - evidences of failures.pdfPGS - lezione 60 - evidences of failures.pdf
PGS - lezione 60 - evidences of failures.pdf
 
La realtà dei ponti e dei viadotti: controllo e manutenzione
La realtà dei ponti e dei viadotti: controllo e manutenzioneLa realtà dei ponti e dei viadotti: controllo e manutenzione
La realtà dei ponti e dei viadotti: controllo e manutenzione
 
ANALISI DEL RISCHIO PER LA SICUREZZA NELLE GALLERIE STRADALI.
ANALISI DEL RISCHIO PER LA SICUREZZA NELLE GALLERIE STRADALI.ANALISI DEL RISCHIO PER LA SICUREZZA NELLE GALLERIE STRADALI.
ANALISI DEL RISCHIO PER LA SICUREZZA NELLE GALLERIE STRADALI.
 
RISK ANALYSIS FOR SEVERE TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN ROAD TUNNELS
RISK ANALYSIS FOR SEVERE TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN ROAD TUNNELSRISK ANALYSIS FOR SEVERE TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN ROAD TUNNELS
RISK ANALYSIS FOR SEVERE TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN ROAD TUNNELS
 
Approccio sistemico al progetto dei grandi ponti
Approccio sistemico al progetto dei grandi pontiApproccio sistemico al progetto dei grandi ponti
Approccio sistemico al progetto dei grandi ponti
 
PGS - lezione D - grandi strutture.pdf
PGS - lezione D - grandi strutture.pdfPGS - lezione D - grandi strutture.pdf
PGS - lezione D - grandi strutture.pdf
 
PGS - lezione F - ingegneria forense.pdf
PGS - lezione F - ingegneria forense.pdfPGS - lezione F - ingegneria forense.pdf
PGS - lezione F - ingegneria forense.pdf
 
PGS - lezione C - controllo e manutenzione.pdf
PGS - lezione C - controllo e manutenzione.pdfPGS - lezione C - controllo e manutenzione.pdf
PGS - lezione C - controllo e manutenzione.pdf
 
PSA_MF_05_05_23.pdf
PSA_MF_05_05_23.pdfPSA_MF_05_05_23.pdf
PSA_MF_05_05_23.pdf
 
PSA_MF_04_05_23.pdf
PSA_MF_04_05_23.pdfPSA_MF_04_05_23.pdf
PSA_MF_04_05_23.pdf
 
Fenomeni di instabilita'
Fenomeni di instabilita'Fenomeni di instabilita'
Fenomeni di instabilita'
 
Introduzione al Calcolo Elasto – Plastico «a freddo» delle strutture in acciaio
Introduzione al Calcolo Elasto – Plastico «a freddo» delle strutture in acciaioIntroduzione al Calcolo Elasto – Plastico «a freddo» delle strutture in acciaio
Introduzione al Calcolo Elasto – Plastico «a freddo» delle strutture in acciaio
 
FB - PSA Esercitazione 1_12_18-II parte.pdf
FB - PSA Esercitazione 1_12_18-II parte.pdfFB - PSA Esercitazione 1_12_18-II parte.pdf
FB - PSA Esercitazione 1_12_18-II parte.pdf
 
Gestione di Ponti e Grandi Strutture: Spalle - Pile - Antenne
Gestione di Ponti e Grandi Strutture: Spalle - Pile - AntenneGestione di Ponti e Grandi Strutture: Spalle - Pile - Antenne
Gestione di Ponti e Grandi Strutture: Spalle - Pile - Antenne
 
Esplosioni.
Esplosioni.Esplosioni.
Esplosioni.
 
PGS - lezione 04 - MODELLAZIONI DISCRETE.pdf
PGS - lezione 04 - MODELLAZIONI DISCRETE.pdfPGS - lezione 04 - MODELLAZIONI DISCRETE.pdf
PGS - lezione 04 - MODELLAZIONI DISCRETE.pdf
 
PGS - lezione 03 - IMPALCATO DA PONTE E PIASTRE.pdf
PGS - lezione 03 - IMPALCATO DA PONTE E PIASTRE.pdfPGS - lezione 03 - IMPALCATO DA PONTE E PIASTRE.pdf
PGS - lezione 03 - IMPALCATO DA PONTE E PIASTRE.pdf
 
INCENDIO
INCENDIOINCENDIO
INCENDIO
 

Recently uploaded

DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakesDeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
MayuraD1
 
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayStandard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Epec Engineered Technologies
 

Recently uploaded (20)

457503602-5-Gas-Well-Testing-and-Analysis-pptx.pptx
457503602-5-Gas-Well-Testing-and-Analysis-pptx.pptx457503602-5-Gas-Well-Testing-and-Analysis-pptx.pptx
457503602-5-Gas-Well-Testing-and-Analysis-pptx.pptx
 
Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.
 
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptxOrlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
 
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and properties
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and propertiesPE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and properties
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and properties
 
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Service
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best ServiceTamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Service
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Service
 
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - VThermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
 
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced LoadsFEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
 
Moment Distribution Method For Btech Civil
Moment Distribution Method For Btech CivilMoment Distribution Method For Btech Civil
Moment Distribution Method For Btech Civil
 
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptxCOST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
 
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdfdata_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
 
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPTGenerative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
 
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the startDesign For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
 
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.pptThermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
 
HAND TOOLS USED AT ELECTRONICS WORK PRESENTED BY KOUSTAV SARKAR
HAND TOOLS USED AT ELECTRONICS WORK PRESENTED BY KOUSTAV SARKARHAND TOOLS USED AT ELECTRONICS WORK PRESENTED BY KOUSTAV SARKAR
HAND TOOLS USED AT ELECTRONICS WORK PRESENTED BY KOUSTAV SARKAR
 
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakesDeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
 
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayStandard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
 
School management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdfSchool management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdf
 
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna MunicipalityA Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
 
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueDouble Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
 
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
 

Esempio di struttura soggetta a incendio: hangar

  • 1. Esempio di struttura soggetta a incendio: hangar Prof. Ing. Franco Bontempi Ordinario di Tecnica delle Costruzioni Facolta’ di Ingegneria Civile e Industriale Universita’ degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza” franco.bontempi@uniroma1.it
  • 2. 3.6.1.5.4. Verifiche di resistenza 2 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 3. Mechanical Analysis • The mechanical analysis shall be performed for the same duration as used in the temperature analysis. • Verification of fire resistance should be in: – in the strength domain: Rfi,d,t ≥ Efi,requ,t (resistance at time t ≥ load effects at time t); – in the time domain: tfi,d ≥ tfi,requ (design value of time fire resistance ≥ time required) – In the temperature domain: Td ≤ Tcr (design value of the material temperature ≤ critical material temperature); 3 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 4. Verification of fire resistance (3D) R = structural resistance T = temperature t = time T=T(t) R=R(t,T)=R(t,T(t))=R(t) 4 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 5. Verification of fire resistance (R-safe) R = structural resistance T = temperature t = time Rfi,d,t Efi,requ,t 5 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 6. Verification of fire resistance (R-fail) R = structural resistance T = temperature t = time Efi,requ,t Rfi,d,t Failure ! 6 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 7. Verification of fire resistance (t) R = structural resistance T = temperature t = time Efi,requ,t Rfi,d,t Failure ! tfi,d ≥ tfi,requ 7 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 8. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 R60 945 ̊C R30 842 ̊C R15 739 ̊C R60 945 ̊C R30 842 ̊C R15 739 ̊C R90 1006 ̊C Time [min] R120 1049 ̊C 8 Standard (Conventional) Fire: ISO 834 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 9. R = structural resistance T = temperature t = time Efi,requ,t Rfi,d,t Failure ! Td ≤ Tcr 9 Verification of fire resistance (T) 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 10. 32,85 m 65,64 m Vista A-A Vista B-B C C Vista A-A Vista B-B Sezione C-C 32,82 m 32,82 m 7,00 m 12,82 m 9,02 m 16,425 m Geometry 10 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 14. Performance goal 1 2 3 4 - …. - …. - Structural strength for 20 minutes - …. - …. 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 14
  • 15. FIRE MODEL HEAT TRANSFER MODEL STRUCTURAL MODEL Fire thermal exposure Thermal gradients Load capacity Room geometry, Fuel load, Fire characteristics Element geometry, Thermal properties, Heat transfer coefficients Element geometry, Applied loads, Mechanical properties 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 15
  • 16. Fire modeling: conventional Curva standard ISO 834 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 t (sec) T (°C) 7,00 m 6,54m Fire zone size : 45,8 m2 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 16
  • 17. Constitutive law for steel Tensioni-Deformazioni al variare della Temperatura 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 0 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,1 0,12 0,14 0,16 0,18 0,2 Deformazioni (%) Tensioni (KN/m 2 ) 1100°C 1000°C 900°C 800°C 700°C 600°C 500°C 400°C 300°C 200°C 100°C Fattori riduttivi delle caratteristiche meccaniche 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 T (°C) Fattori riduttivi Ky,T Kp,T K E,T T (°C) E (Pa) σy (Pa) α (1/°C) 0 210000000000 235000000 0,00001170 20 210000000000 235000000 0,00001170 100 210000000000 235000000 0,00001195 200 189000000000 232884193 0,00001227 300 168000000000 230689179 0,00001258 400 147000000000 228405976 0,00001297 500 126000000000 178561976 0,00001313 600 65100000000 107131683 0,00001338 700 27300000000 52248249 0,00001360 800 18900000000 25174565 0,00001382 900 14175000000 13851676 0,00001401 1000 9450000000 9234450,5 0,00001419 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 17
  • 18. 2° Scenario 3° Scenario 1° Scenario Definition of scenarios 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 18
  • 19. 7,00 m 6,54 m 1st Scenario 19 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 23. 1st 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 23
  • 24. 1st - lateral displacements 24 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 25. 1st - vertical displacements 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 25
  • 28. 2nd 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 28
  • 29. 2nd – vertical displacements 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 29
  • 33. 3rd – vertical displacements 33 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 34. 3rd – lateral displacements 34 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 35. Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 RESULTS SYNTHESIS Confronti spostamenti laterali Y -2,50E-01 -2,00E-01 -1,50E-01 -1,00E-01 -5,00E-02 0,00E+00 5,00E-02 1,00E-01 1,50E-01 2,00E-01 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Tempo (sec) Spostamenti laterali (m) Scenaio 3 Scenario 1 35 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 36. FIRE MODEL HEAT TRANSFER MODEL STRUCTURAL MODEL Fire thermal exposure Thermal gradients Load capacity Room geometry, Fuel load, Fire characteristics Element geometry, Thermal properties, Heat transfer coefficients Element geometry, Applied loads, Mechanical properties 36 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 37. FINITE ELEMENT MODELING FINITE VOLUME MODELING FIRE SIMULATION STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE 37 Fire modeling: explicit 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 39. 1°Case : NO OPENING 2°Case : OPENING OF THE DOORS AFTER 5 MINUTES DUE TO FIREFIGTHERS ARRIVE 3°Case : DOORS ALWAYS OPEN SYSTEM SCENARIOS 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 39
  • 40. 1 2 2 3 3 4 1 2 2 3 3 4 Structure / Action Interaction Discretization for structural modeling Discretization for action modeling 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 40
  • 42. 2°Case : OPENING OF THE DOORS AFER 5 MINUTES VENT FIRES 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 42
  • 44. 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR 44
  • 46. Confronto Zona 1 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 t(sec) T(°C) 1° Caso: Ambiente chiuso 2°Caso: Arrivo VVF 5min 3° Caso: Ambiente aperto 1 2 2 3 3 4 1°Case : NO OPENING 2°Case : DOORS OPEN AFTER 5 MNUTES 3°Case : DOORS ALWAYS OPEN Scenarios Temperatures 46 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 47. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 t(sec) T(°C) ELICOTTERO CURVA ISO834 CURVA IDROCARBURI 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 t(sec) T(°C) CURVA ISO834 CURVA IDROCARBURI 47 08/03/2023 PSA - HANGAR
  • 48. Esempio di struttura soggetta a incendio: hangar Prof. Ing. Franco Bontempi Ordinario di Tecnica delle Costruzioni Facolta’ di Ingegneria Civile e Industriale Universita’ degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza” franco.bontempi@uniroma1.it