This document provides information about an English 102 course taught by instructor Jeremiah Akin. The course focuses on expository and argumentative essay writing, including summaries, critiques, and syntheses of texts. Key goals for students by the end of the course include accurately assessing audiences, comprehending and analyzing authors' ideas, presenting their own ideas clearly, writing critical analyses, and conducting research. The class will use popular culture as its theme and focus on discussion. Major assignments include papers on a pop culture icon, constructing an icon's public image, and an advertising campaign research paper. The class uses a discussion-based format and expects respectful participation. Grades are based on assignments, attendance, and participation.
This document discusses assessing and setting language goals for students. It provides examples of language challenges students face in different content areas like science, social studies and mathematics. These include specialized vocabulary, expository text structures, and unfamiliar concepts. The document also discusses levels of vocabulary complexity and designing instruction with clear goals, assessments and support for language development. Teachers are encouraged to consider language standards and student language needs when planning lessons to ensure both content and language goals are addressed.
This presentation is for research writers, both advanced undergraduate writers and graduate students (even junior faculty needed writing support!). It assumes that the reader is familiar with the basic purpose of the literature review, and delves deeply into *how* the writer might compose this part of the research article. It also assumes that the technical features of this difficult genre are underestimated, and thereby approaches the literature review as a *drama.* Research writers should feel free to draw on the presentation for strategies that will enable them to articulate their understanding of how their research problem influences the way their field talks about and acts in regards to this problem. Specifically, an examination of grammar as code for drama is explored.
SOARES, DORIS DE A. Developing critical writing skills in L2. BRAZ-TSOL Newsl...Doris Soares
Teaching L2 writing skills entails much more than simply setting a topic, collecting and correcting students’ writing and giving it back hoping that learners will write better texts next time. Therefore, we must help our students reflect upon all the elements involved in the making of a text. In other words, we must empower them to critically assess writing tasks and to critically read their own productions in order to improve them.
Guidelines for writing an interpretive essaydo not use the wssuser47f0be
This document provides guidelines for writing an interpretive essay on works by Machiavelli, Locke, and Marx. It instructs students to write a 5-7 page essay interpreting one of two prompts about these authors' views on rulership, property, and human nature. The document outlines formatting expectations, advises using only assigned readings and lectures as sources, and warns against plagiarism. It also provides examples of in-text citations and formatting a bibliography.
This case study aimed at investigating the role of self-efficacy in students’ recount text especially in the area of writing as one of the most difficult skills in learning English. Writing difficulties faced by the students are not only based on their cognitive skill but also their own efficacy beliefs. Three problems can be found related to self-efficacy beliefs in English writing. They are related with confidence to write anxiety, and the third problem is about the students’ interest. The participants of this study are three students from a Senior High School in Indramayu. The data were obtained from three data collection: questionnaire, writing test, and also the interview. The result of this study shows that the participants of this study perceived mastery experience accounted for the greatest proportion in their writing ability. It can be seen from how students rate their confidence and given overall feelings about the way to write successfully. Social persuasions and physiological states also were influential while working on writing. Meanwhile, the common experience did not predict too much in students' writing ability. Ultimately, the results of this research concluded that self-efficacy has an important role in students’ ability in writing.
Writing presentation bob wilson - dec 2010Ed Ingman
The document discusses strategies for helping students improve their writing skills. It includes perspectives from a Writing Across the Curriculum initiative discussion group on making students more comfortable expressing themselves through writing. Group members emphasize the importance of students being able to articulate thoughts in an academic context, using analysis, synthesis and evaluation. The document also outlines objectives for exposing students to writing as a way to communicate and develop their learning, as well as activities like group discussions and projects to help students improve their writing and thinking skills.
This document provides guidance for academics on publishing scholarship of teaching and learning research. It discusses key steps including: understanding student learning, identifying research questions, positioning work within existing literature, building writing skills, getting feedback on drafts, and publishing. Publishing such work requires it to be public, peer-reviewed, and accessible to one's field. The document emphasizes understanding publication outlets and audiences before writing to ensure work meets expectations.
This document provides information about an English 102 course taught by instructor Jeremiah Akin. The course focuses on expository and argumentative essay writing, including summaries, critiques, and syntheses of texts. Key goals for students by the end of the course include accurately assessing audiences, comprehending and analyzing authors' ideas, presenting their own ideas clearly, writing critical analyses, and conducting research. The class will use popular culture as its theme and focus on discussion. Major assignments include papers on a pop culture icon, constructing an icon's public image, and an advertising campaign research paper. The class uses a discussion-based format and expects respectful participation. Grades are based on assignments, attendance, and participation.
This document discusses assessing and setting language goals for students. It provides examples of language challenges students face in different content areas like science, social studies and mathematics. These include specialized vocabulary, expository text structures, and unfamiliar concepts. The document also discusses levels of vocabulary complexity and designing instruction with clear goals, assessments and support for language development. Teachers are encouraged to consider language standards and student language needs when planning lessons to ensure both content and language goals are addressed.
This presentation is for research writers, both advanced undergraduate writers and graduate students (even junior faculty needed writing support!). It assumes that the reader is familiar with the basic purpose of the literature review, and delves deeply into *how* the writer might compose this part of the research article. It also assumes that the technical features of this difficult genre are underestimated, and thereby approaches the literature review as a *drama.* Research writers should feel free to draw on the presentation for strategies that will enable them to articulate their understanding of how their research problem influences the way their field talks about and acts in regards to this problem. Specifically, an examination of grammar as code for drama is explored.
SOARES, DORIS DE A. Developing critical writing skills in L2. BRAZ-TSOL Newsl...Doris Soares
Teaching L2 writing skills entails much more than simply setting a topic, collecting and correcting students’ writing and giving it back hoping that learners will write better texts next time. Therefore, we must help our students reflect upon all the elements involved in the making of a text. In other words, we must empower them to critically assess writing tasks and to critically read their own productions in order to improve them.
Guidelines for writing an interpretive essaydo not use the wssuser47f0be
This document provides guidelines for writing an interpretive essay on works by Machiavelli, Locke, and Marx. It instructs students to write a 5-7 page essay interpreting one of two prompts about these authors' views on rulership, property, and human nature. The document outlines formatting expectations, advises using only assigned readings and lectures as sources, and warns against plagiarism. It also provides examples of in-text citations and formatting a bibliography.
This case study aimed at investigating the role of self-efficacy in students’ recount text especially in the area of writing as one of the most difficult skills in learning English. Writing difficulties faced by the students are not only based on their cognitive skill but also their own efficacy beliefs. Three problems can be found related to self-efficacy beliefs in English writing. They are related with confidence to write anxiety, and the third problem is about the students’ interest. The participants of this study are three students from a Senior High School in Indramayu. The data were obtained from three data collection: questionnaire, writing test, and also the interview. The result of this study shows that the participants of this study perceived mastery experience accounted for the greatest proportion in their writing ability. It can be seen from how students rate their confidence and given overall feelings about the way to write successfully. Social persuasions and physiological states also were influential while working on writing. Meanwhile, the common experience did not predict too much in students' writing ability. Ultimately, the results of this research concluded that self-efficacy has an important role in students’ ability in writing.
Writing presentation bob wilson - dec 2010Ed Ingman
The document discusses strategies for helping students improve their writing skills. It includes perspectives from a Writing Across the Curriculum initiative discussion group on making students more comfortable expressing themselves through writing. Group members emphasize the importance of students being able to articulate thoughts in an academic context, using analysis, synthesis and evaluation. The document also outlines objectives for exposing students to writing as a way to communicate and develop their learning, as well as activities like group discussions and projects to help students improve their writing and thinking skills.
This document provides guidance for academics on publishing scholarship of teaching and learning research. It discusses key steps including: understanding student learning, identifying research questions, positioning work within existing literature, building writing skills, getting feedback on drafts, and publishing. Publishing such work requires it to be public, peer-reviewed, and accessible to one's field. The document emphasizes understanding publication outlets and audiences before writing to ensure work meets expectations.
This document provides an introduction to an online English composition course. It summarizes the instructor's background and teaching philosophy, which emphasizes writing as a process and sees education as an opportunity for lifelong learning. It outlines the course goals of developing analytical, critical thinking, and writing skills through argumentative writing and research assignments. The document also reviews course logistics like the online platform, communication methods, assignments and due dates, and emphasizes completing the first lessons within the first week. Students are directed to complete initial course activities like posting an introduction, buying textbooks, and beginning the first unit of coursework.
Critical Thinking and English Education (Christopher J. Long, 2003)itarankoto
1. The document discusses the debate around teaching critical thinking skills in English education in non-Western contexts like Japan.
2. It defines critical thinking as a set of skills rather than a single skill, and argues that culture influences individuals' strengths and weaknesses in critical thinking.
3. It rejects the idea that those from non-Western cultures are less suited for critical thinking, and argues that recent educational reforms in Japan aim to develop critical thinking skills, so teaching these skills supports domestic policy goals.
ISM: Literature search, critical writing & readingAlison Hardy
The document provides an overview of key concepts for conducting a literature review, including the purpose of a literature review, theoretical frameworks, contextual frameworks, critical analysis of sources, and structuring a critical review of a peer-reviewed journal article. It defines important theoretical concepts like theory, theoretical frameworks, and contextual frameworks. It also discusses developing definitions when clear concepts are not available. The document offers examples and guidelines for critically analyzing sources, identifying subjective language, and structuring a literature review and critical review of a source.
This document discusses strategies for providing effective feedback on student writing. It defines feedback as a formative response from readers to help students improve their work, as opposed to summative evaluation. Specific feedback is important to help students make meaning and develop problem-solving skills. Good feedback questions are open-ended, diagnostic, and prompt extension and action. When working in teams, clear roles and processes for feedback are important. Overall, the document emphasizes making feedback specific and focused on moving the work forward.
Literature Reviews and academic writingNick Reynolds
The document provides guidance on writing literature reviews for academic essays and research. It explains that a literature review surveys and synthesizes existing scholarly publications on a topic to establish current knowledge and identify gaps. It discusses common problems such as lack of context or relevance in citations. The document offers tips for critically analyzing sources and referencing them properly in a literature review. It emphasizes that reviews should synthesize findings around a guiding concept rather than just listing summaries.
This document discusses how writing can help students learn and process content at a deeper level. It provides perspectives from experts that writing requires students to struggle with details and ideas in a way that leads to stronger understanding. When students write about content, it helps them organize, analyze and communicate their knowledge. The document suggests teachers model writing activities for different subject areas and provide feedback to help students improve. Effective writing assignments demonstrate students' mastery of key concepts through use of vocabulary and clear explanations.
This document provides an overview of the Reading Assessment test format and strategies for preparing. It discusses the two reading passages that will be presented, which total 700-900 words each on different topics. Sixteen comprehension questions will test understanding of explicit and implicit meanings across seven question types. When practicing, readers should read passages thoroughly before answering sequential questions, using topic sentences to help answer. The document reviews each question type and strategies for practicing to improve reading skills and prepare for the assessment.
This is a draft of the presentation that will be given at the HEA Social Sciences annual conference - Teaching forward: the future of the Social Sciences.
For further details of the conference: http://bit.ly/1cRDx0p
Bookings open until 14 May 2014 http://bit.ly/1hzCMLR or external.events@heacademy.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
We report in this presentation on a current project of which the aim is to develop teaching approaches that engage doctoral students in working together as a research community to develop their critical writing and peer reviewing skills. We seek to foster in students a sense of collective endeavour in developing writing and research, and to encourage the sharing of ideas, drafts, and semi-formed thoughts in an atmosphere of mutual support. The project was launched via a residential critical writing weekend for students, featuring a range of taught sessions focussing on aspects of critical writing and reviewing and
featuring opportunities for students to engage in peer assessment activities. The students then formed an
editorial board for an online journal for doctoral students, through which they are involved in critical
writing, reviewing, providing feedback, editing and publishing a journal.
This document discusses strategies for overcoming writer's block. It begins with student responses describing writer's block using metaphors. It then discusses the root causes of writer's block as being fixation and lack of divergent and convergent thinking. It recommends using heuristics rather than rigid rules when writing. Several strategies are provided to help generate ideas, including beginning with what you know, establishing a personal connection to the topic, discussing topics in a group, and doing research. Additional tips are given for addressing writer's block before and during the writing process, as well as reflecting after writing.
Exploring the Use of Creative and Academic WritingEileen Murphy
Templates and imitative writing has been used since classical times to empower students and may be more useful now than ever as we enter the age of the Common Core State Standards.
–Teaching English for the learners pursuing a
course in Engineering does not involve just the LSRW
skills. As it is a course in ESP, more specifically, EST
(English for Science and Technology), we as teachers are
more concerned of equipping them with the skills required
to face the challenges of their profession. The learners
have to face a cut-throat competition as the number of
learners puruing a course in Engineering is increasing year
by year and the companies rely on the professionals for an
extra edge of human skills. The selection process for a job
involves a screening test based on Group Discussions.
These discussions test the soft skills or human skills of the
candidates which are mainly based on their thinking
abilities. A problem is given to them and they are asked to
come to a common consensus as a team. The candidates
are required to employ creative thinking, divergent
thinking, logical reasoning, critical analysis etc. to
perform effectively. Till their graduation, the learners are
used to rote-learning from the (written) examination point
of view. The learners should be explained the importance
of thinking and brain storming at this stage. This paper is
based on the study undertaken by the researcher to
develop the thinking skills of the I year learners pursuing
a course in Engineering.
Academic skills lever 3 student's book richard harisonNana Lost
This document is the contents page and introduction for the student's book "Headway Academic Skills: Listening, Speaking, and Study Skills LEVEL 3". It provides an overview of the book's structure and topics. The book contains 10 chapters that develop listening, speaking, and study skills through topics like learning and intelligence, health and fitness, and technological advances. Each chapter includes activities to develop specific skills like listening for gist, critical thinking, note-taking, and giving presentations. It also includes regular vocabulary development sections.
Lesson 6.2 Activity: Culture and Collective Learning DebateBig History Project
Does culture count as collective learning? Debate this topic with your classmates and decide if cultural changes occur as a direct result of our ability to learn collectively.
Register to explore the whole course here: https://school.bighistoryproject.com/bhplive?WT.mc_id=Slideshare12202017
Ihp 630 discussion rubric guidelines for submission yossuser47f0be
The document provides guidelines for students submitting discussion posts for an online course. It states that for each discussion topic, students must post an initial response of 1-2 paragraphs analyzing the prompt. They must also reply to at least two other students' posts. Initial posts are due by Thursday at 11:59pm Eastern time each week, and response posts are due by Sunday at 11:59pm of the student's local time zone. Posts should demonstrate thoughtful engagement with course concepts and peers' perspectives, rather than just stating opinions.
This document discusses strategies for teaching and comprehending informational texts. It describes the complex structures of informational texts and strategies like using graphic organizers, recognizing text structures, connecting to prior knowledge, asking and answering questions, summarizing, and engaging students. Teachers should integrate these comprehension strategies and assess students to ensure they are learning from informational texts.
Group discussions may involve two types of topics - factual and abstract. Factual topics require familiarity with facts and can be further divided into factual generic topics, which test interpersonal skills rather than specific knowledge, and factual specific topics, which assess understanding of select areas and current affairs. Abstract topics are based on one's perceptions and the ability to generate implications and ideas to add substance to an otherwise abstract concept. Examples of both factual and abstract topics are provided.
The documents discuss research on sexual activity among adolescents, including prevalence of STIs among females aged 14-19, biological and social influences on early dating, and the influence of parental involvement on adolescent decision making and contraceptive use. Biological changes during puberty, involvement with older peers, and lack of parental monitoring were linked to earlier dating and risk behaviors. Open communication with parents about sex and contraception can encourage safer decision making among sexually active adolescents.
Critical thinking is one of the major and rapidly growing concepts in education. Today, its role in second and foreign language learning and teaching is of great importance. Critical thinking skills and the mastery of the English language are expected to become essential outcomes of university education. To become fluent in a language and must be able to think critically and express thoughts, students need practise speaking activities using critical thinking skills. In this article, we define the concept “critical thinking” and discuss the role of critical thinking in the development of speaking skills through some practical activities that can be used in the classroom for students to practice critical thinking skills H. Muhammadiyeva, D. Mahkamova, Sh. Valiyeva and I. Tojiboyev 2020. The role of critical thinking in developing speaking skills. International Journal on Integrated Education. 3, 1 (Mar. 2020), 62-64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v3i1.41 Pdf Url : https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJIE/article/view/41/39 Paper Url : https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJIE/article/view/41
Writing Presentation - Bob Wilson - Dec 2010Ed Ingman
The document discusses helping students improve their writing skills through a Writing Across the Curriculum initiative. It notes that students need to be able to articulate thoughts in an academic way and that writing can help students interact more deeply with ideas. However, many students lack basic organizational skills and the ability to engage in reasoned analysis. The initiative aims to expose students to writing to communicate learning, help them understand necessary structure, and start thinking in a way that mirrors effective composition. Group activities and modeling appropriate essay development are discussed as ways to collaboratively develop these skills.
The document discusses classroom assessment and instructional objectives. It provides learning objectives for understanding aims, goals and objectives; SMART objectives; Bloom's and Krathwohl's taxonomies; and higher-order versus lower-order thinking skills. It defines aims, goals, objectives, and types of objectives. It also explains Bloom's original and Krathwohl's revised taxonomies, providing descriptions and examples of cognitive levels from remembering to creating. The document concludes with a self-assessment activity.
This document provides an introduction to an online English composition course. It summarizes the instructor's background and teaching philosophy, which emphasizes writing as a process and sees education as an opportunity for lifelong learning. It outlines the course goals of developing analytical, critical thinking, and writing skills through argumentative writing and research assignments. The document also reviews course logistics like the online platform, communication methods, assignments and due dates, and emphasizes completing the first lessons within the first week. Students are directed to complete initial course activities like posting an introduction, buying textbooks, and beginning the first unit of coursework.
Critical Thinking and English Education (Christopher J. Long, 2003)itarankoto
1. The document discusses the debate around teaching critical thinking skills in English education in non-Western contexts like Japan.
2. It defines critical thinking as a set of skills rather than a single skill, and argues that culture influences individuals' strengths and weaknesses in critical thinking.
3. It rejects the idea that those from non-Western cultures are less suited for critical thinking, and argues that recent educational reforms in Japan aim to develop critical thinking skills, so teaching these skills supports domestic policy goals.
ISM: Literature search, critical writing & readingAlison Hardy
The document provides an overview of key concepts for conducting a literature review, including the purpose of a literature review, theoretical frameworks, contextual frameworks, critical analysis of sources, and structuring a critical review of a peer-reviewed journal article. It defines important theoretical concepts like theory, theoretical frameworks, and contextual frameworks. It also discusses developing definitions when clear concepts are not available. The document offers examples and guidelines for critically analyzing sources, identifying subjective language, and structuring a literature review and critical review of a source.
This document discusses strategies for providing effective feedback on student writing. It defines feedback as a formative response from readers to help students improve their work, as opposed to summative evaluation. Specific feedback is important to help students make meaning and develop problem-solving skills. Good feedback questions are open-ended, diagnostic, and prompt extension and action. When working in teams, clear roles and processes for feedback are important. Overall, the document emphasizes making feedback specific and focused on moving the work forward.
Literature Reviews and academic writingNick Reynolds
The document provides guidance on writing literature reviews for academic essays and research. It explains that a literature review surveys and synthesizes existing scholarly publications on a topic to establish current knowledge and identify gaps. It discusses common problems such as lack of context or relevance in citations. The document offers tips for critically analyzing sources and referencing them properly in a literature review. It emphasizes that reviews should synthesize findings around a guiding concept rather than just listing summaries.
This document discusses how writing can help students learn and process content at a deeper level. It provides perspectives from experts that writing requires students to struggle with details and ideas in a way that leads to stronger understanding. When students write about content, it helps them organize, analyze and communicate their knowledge. The document suggests teachers model writing activities for different subject areas and provide feedback to help students improve. Effective writing assignments demonstrate students' mastery of key concepts through use of vocabulary and clear explanations.
This document provides an overview of the Reading Assessment test format and strategies for preparing. It discusses the two reading passages that will be presented, which total 700-900 words each on different topics. Sixteen comprehension questions will test understanding of explicit and implicit meanings across seven question types. When practicing, readers should read passages thoroughly before answering sequential questions, using topic sentences to help answer. The document reviews each question type and strategies for practicing to improve reading skills and prepare for the assessment.
This is a draft of the presentation that will be given at the HEA Social Sciences annual conference - Teaching forward: the future of the Social Sciences.
For further details of the conference: http://bit.ly/1cRDx0p
Bookings open until 14 May 2014 http://bit.ly/1hzCMLR or external.events@heacademy.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
We report in this presentation on a current project of which the aim is to develop teaching approaches that engage doctoral students in working together as a research community to develop their critical writing and peer reviewing skills. We seek to foster in students a sense of collective endeavour in developing writing and research, and to encourage the sharing of ideas, drafts, and semi-formed thoughts in an atmosphere of mutual support. The project was launched via a residential critical writing weekend for students, featuring a range of taught sessions focussing on aspects of critical writing and reviewing and
featuring opportunities for students to engage in peer assessment activities. The students then formed an
editorial board for an online journal for doctoral students, through which they are involved in critical
writing, reviewing, providing feedback, editing and publishing a journal.
This document discusses strategies for overcoming writer's block. It begins with student responses describing writer's block using metaphors. It then discusses the root causes of writer's block as being fixation and lack of divergent and convergent thinking. It recommends using heuristics rather than rigid rules when writing. Several strategies are provided to help generate ideas, including beginning with what you know, establishing a personal connection to the topic, discussing topics in a group, and doing research. Additional tips are given for addressing writer's block before and during the writing process, as well as reflecting after writing.
Exploring the Use of Creative and Academic WritingEileen Murphy
Templates and imitative writing has been used since classical times to empower students and may be more useful now than ever as we enter the age of the Common Core State Standards.
–Teaching English for the learners pursuing a
course in Engineering does not involve just the LSRW
skills. As it is a course in ESP, more specifically, EST
(English for Science and Technology), we as teachers are
more concerned of equipping them with the skills required
to face the challenges of their profession. The learners
have to face a cut-throat competition as the number of
learners puruing a course in Engineering is increasing year
by year and the companies rely on the professionals for an
extra edge of human skills. The selection process for a job
involves a screening test based on Group Discussions.
These discussions test the soft skills or human skills of the
candidates which are mainly based on their thinking
abilities. A problem is given to them and they are asked to
come to a common consensus as a team. The candidates
are required to employ creative thinking, divergent
thinking, logical reasoning, critical analysis etc. to
perform effectively. Till their graduation, the learners are
used to rote-learning from the (written) examination point
of view. The learners should be explained the importance
of thinking and brain storming at this stage. This paper is
based on the study undertaken by the researcher to
develop the thinking skills of the I year learners pursuing
a course in Engineering.
Academic skills lever 3 student's book richard harisonNana Lost
This document is the contents page and introduction for the student's book "Headway Academic Skills: Listening, Speaking, and Study Skills LEVEL 3". It provides an overview of the book's structure and topics. The book contains 10 chapters that develop listening, speaking, and study skills through topics like learning and intelligence, health and fitness, and technological advances. Each chapter includes activities to develop specific skills like listening for gist, critical thinking, note-taking, and giving presentations. It also includes regular vocabulary development sections.
Lesson 6.2 Activity: Culture and Collective Learning DebateBig History Project
Does culture count as collective learning? Debate this topic with your classmates and decide if cultural changes occur as a direct result of our ability to learn collectively.
Register to explore the whole course here: https://school.bighistoryproject.com/bhplive?WT.mc_id=Slideshare12202017
Ihp 630 discussion rubric guidelines for submission yossuser47f0be
The document provides guidelines for students submitting discussion posts for an online course. It states that for each discussion topic, students must post an initial response of 1-2 paragraphs analyzing the prompt. They must also reply to at least two other students' posts. Initial posts are due by Thursday at 11:59pm Eastern time each week, and response posts are due by Sunday at 11:59pm of the student's local time zone. Posts should demonstrate thoughtful engagement with course concepts and peers' perspectives, rather than just stating opinions.
This document discusses strategies for teaching and comprehending informational texts. It describes the complex structures of informational texts and strategies like using graphic organizers, recognizing text structures, connecting to prior knowledge, asking and answering questions, summarizing, and engaging students. Teachers should integrate these comprehension strategies and assess students to ensure they are learning from informational texts.
Group discussions may involve two types of topics - factual and abstract. Factual topics require familiarity with facts and can be further divided into factual generic topics, which test interpersonal skills rather than specific knowledge, and factual specific topics, which assess understanding of select areas and current affairs. Abstract topics are based on one's perceptions and the ability to generate implications and ideas to add substance to an otherwise abstract concept. Examples of both factual and abstract topics are provided.
The documents discuss research on sexual activity among adolescents, including prevalence of STIs among females aged 14-19, biological and social influences on early dating, and the influence of parental involvement on adolescent decision making and contraceptive use. Biological changes during puberty, involvement with older peers, and lack of parental monitoring were linked to earlier dating and risk behaviors. Open communication with parents about sex and contraception can encourage safer decision making among sexually active adolescents.
Critical thinking is one of the major and rapidly growing concepts in education. Today, its role in second and foreign language learning and teaching is of great importance. Critical thinking skills and the mastery of the English language are expected to become essential outcomes of university education. To become fluent in a language and must be able to think critically and express thoughts, students need practise speaking activities using critical thinking skills. In this article, we define the concept “critical thinking” and discuss the role of critical thinking in the development of speaking skills through some practical activities that can be used in the classroom for students to practice critical thinking skills H. Muhammadiyeva, D. Mahkamova, Sh. Valiyeva and I. Tojiboyev 2020. The role of critical thinking in developing speaking skills. International Journal on Integrated Education. 3, 1 (Mar. 2020), 62-64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v3i1.41 Pdf Url : https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJIE/article/view/41/39 Paper Url : https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJIE/article/view/41
Writing Presentation - Bob Wilson - Dec 2010Ed Ingman
The document discusses helping students improve their writing skills through a Writing Across the Curriculum initiative. It notes that students need to be able to articulate thoughts in an academic way and that writing can help students interact more deeply with ideas. However, many students lack basic organizational skills and the ability to engage in reasoned analysis. The initiative aims to expose students to writing to communicate learning, help them understand necessary structure, and start thinking in a way that mirrors effective composition. Group activities and modeling appropriate essay development are discussed as ways to collaboratively develop these skills.
The document discusses classroom assessment and instructional objectives. It provides learning objectives for understanding aims, goals and objectives; SMART objectives; Bloom's and Krathwohl's taxonomies; and higher-order versus lower-order thinking skills. It defines aims, goals, objectives, and types of objectives. It also explains Bloom's original and Krathwohl's revised taxonomies, providing descriptions and examples of cognitive levels from remembering to creating. The document concludes with a self-assessment activity.
POSC 100 Current Event Reflection Paper Rubric Criteri.docxharrisonhoward80223
POSC 100 Current Event Reflection Paper Rubric
Criteria Distinguished Proficient Basic Unacceptable
Completeness Complete in every area;
includes all requirements
Mostly complete;
includes most of the
requirements
Mostly incomplete,
includes few of the
requirements
Incomplete in almost
every area; does not
include requirements
Critical Thinking Displays exceptional
critical thinking; uses
class material and
utilizes sophisticated,
original ideas to develop
arguments
Displays advanced
critical thinking; uses
class material and uses
original ideas to develop
arguments
Displays limited critical
thinking; uses some class
material and some
original ideas to develop
arguments
Displays little critical
thinking; uses limited
class material and does
not use original ideas to
develop arguments
Evaluation & Analysis Presents exceptional
analysis of identified
issues; thoroughly
evaluates the issues
Presents sufficient
analysis of identified
issues; evaluates the
issues
Presents little analysis of
identified issues;
provides a vague
evaluation
Presents almost no
analysis of identified
issues
Understanding Demonstrates an
advanced understanding
of the topic(s) and
issue(s)
Demonstrates an above
average understanding of
the topic(s) and issue(s)
Demonstrates a basic
understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s)
Demonstrates an
inadequate understanding
of the topic(s) and
issue(s)
Writing Mechanics Writing is clear, concise,
and well-organized
without grammatical
errors or typos
Writing is mostly clear
and generally organized
with few grammatical
errors or typos
Writing is somewhat
clear but is not well
organized and has many
grammatical errors or
typos
Writing is unclear and
very disorganized with
many grammatical errors
or typos
12/22/2017 Communication Today | Critical Thinking and the Challenges of Internet | Communication Today
http://www.communicationtoday.sk/critical-thinking-and-the-challenges-of-internet/ 1/2
C R I T I C A L T H I N K I N G A N D T H E C H A L L E N G E S O F I N T E R N E T
Critical Thinking and
the Challenges of
Internet
A L E X A N D E R P L E C N E R I S S U E : 2 / 2 0 1 4 , S E C T I O N : T H E O R E T I C A L
S T U D I E S
In this article, the author addresses some challenges to information
searches and information evaluation which were brought by the
Internet. Large segments of audience are exaggerating their
awareness and do not realize that their online behavior is driven
more by emotions than by critical assessment of primary sources.
The result is growing popularity of conspiracy theories,
pseudoscience, propaganda, and alternative medicine. These are
all examples of biased reasoning. Due to scientists, scholars,
teachers, and journalists, this trend can be considered as a potential
threat to public health and democracy. Publics incapable of
informed choices can be manipulated to sup.
The Question is the Answer: Making the Language Arts Classroom Meaningful wit...darinjohn2
Ashley Jorgensen, Price Laboratory School, UNI
This presentation will focus on developing a curriculum built around inquiry-based units of instruction in a secondary language arts classroom. Audiences will have the chance to see evidence of how the use of essential questions can lead students into a process of inquiry, giving them the skills they need to think critically, question the world around them, and broaden and deepen their perspectives by connecting with others. Audiences will embark on a journey that takes them through a course entitled, ‘The American Teenager,’ and see the activities, assessments, and instructional strategies that transformed this course from a traditional study of American Literature to a course that is relevant, engaging, and challenging for teenagers in the 21st century. Through essential questions like ‘How do societal expectations impact our identity?’, ‘What are the costs and benefits of conformity?’ and ‘Is the American Dream a reality for all?’, this course blends classic and contemporary, and combines writers like Sherman Alexie with The Breakfast Club, Henry David Thoreau with text messaging, and Catcher in the Rye with Jay-Z. Audiences will gain important techniques for creating a classroom built around student-led discussions, including Socratic Seminars and blogging, as well as see examples of competency based assessments fully aligned with the Iowa Core Curriculum and National Common Core Standards.
Common misconceptions of critical thinkingSHARON BAILIN, RLynellBull52
Common misconceptions of critical thinking
SHARON BAILIN, ROLAND CASE,
JERROLD R. COOMBS and LEROI B. DANIELS
In this paper, the ® rst of two, we analyse three widely-held conceptions of critical
thinking: as one or more skills, as mental processes, and as sets of procedures. Each
view is, we contend, wrong-headed, misleading or, at best, unhelpful. Some who write
about critical thinking seem to muddle all three views in an unenlightening me lange.
Apart from the errors or inadequacies of the conceptions themselves, they promote or
abet misconceived practices for teaching critical thinking. Together, they have led to
the view that critical thinking is best taught by practising it. We o� er alternative
proposals for the teaching of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a subject of considerable current interest, both in terms
of theory and pedagogy. A great deal is written about critical thinking,
conferences on the subject abound, and educational initiatives aimed at
fostering critical thinking proliferate.1 It is our view that much of the
theoretical work and many of the pedagogical endeavours in this area are
misdirected because they are based on faulty conceptions of critical think-
ing. Critical thinking is frequently conceptualized in terms of skills, pro-
cesses, procedures and practice. Much of the educational literature either
refers to cognitive or thinking skills or equates critical thinking with certain
mental processes or procedural moves that can be improved through
practice. In this paper we attempt to explain the misconceptions inherent
in such ways of conceptualizing critical thinking. It is important to note
that much of the literature contains a pervasive miasma of overlapping uses
of such terms as skill, process, procedure, behaviour, mental operations,
j. curriculum studies, 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, 269± 283
S haron Bailin, a professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6, is interested in philosophical inquiries into critical
thinking, creativity and aesthetic education. Her publications include Reason and V alues:
New Essays in Philosophy of Education (Calgary, AB: Detselig, 1993), co-edited with John P.
Portelli.
Roland Case, an associate professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University,
conducts research in social studies and legal and global education. His most recent book is
The Canadian Anthology of Social S tudies: Issues and S trategies (Burnaby, BC: Faculty of
Education, Simon Fraser University), co-edited with Penney Clark.
Jerrold R. Coombs, a professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia,
has published extensively on ethical issues in education and the development of competence
in practical reasoning. His publications include Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford: Black-
well, 1993), co-edited with Earl R. Winkler.
L eRoi B. Daniels, a professor emeritus in the Faculty of Education, University of British
Columbia, ...
Common misconceptions of critical thinkingSHARON BAILIN, R.docxclarebernice
Common misconceptions of critical thinking
SHARON BAILIN, ROLAND CASE,
JERROLD R. COOMBS and LEROI B. DANIELS
In this paper, the ®rst of two, we analyse three widely-held conceptions of critical
thinking: as one or more skills, as mental processes, and as sets of procedures. Each
view is, we contend, wrong-headed, misleading or, at best, unhelpful. Some who write
about critical thinking seem to muddle all three views in an unenlightening meÂlange.
Apart from the errors or inadequacies of the conceptions themselves, they promote or
abet misconceived practices for teaching critical thinking. Together, they have led to
the view that critical thinking is best taught by practising it. We oÄer alternative
proposals for the teaching of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a subject of considerable current interest, both in terms
of theory and pedagogy. A great deal is written about critical thinking,
conferences on the subject abound, and educational initiatives aimed at
fostering critical thinking proliferate.1 It is our view that much of the
theoretical work and many of the pedagogical endeavours in this area are
misdirected because they are based on faulty conceptions of critical think-
ing. Critical thinking is frequently conceptualized in terms of skills, pro-
cesses, procedures and practice. Much of the educational literature either
refers to cognitive or thinking skills or equates critical thinking with certain
mental processes or procedural moves that can be improved through
practice. In this paper we attempt to explain the misconceptions inherent
in such ways of conceptualizing critical thinking. It is important to note
that much of the literature contains a pervasive miasma of overlapping uses
of such terms as skill, process, procedure, behaviour, mental operations,
j. curriculum studies
, 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, 269±283
S haron Bailin, a professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6, is interested in philosophical inquiries into critical
thinking, creativity and aesthetic education. Her publications include Reason and V alues:
New Essays in Philosophy of Education (Calgary, AB: Detselig, 1993), co-edited with John P.
Portelli.
Roland Case, an associate professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University,
conducts research in social studies and legal and global education. His most recent book is
The Canadian Anthology of Social S tudies: Issues and S trategies (Burnaby, BC: Faculty of
Education, Simon Fraser University), co-edited with Penney Clark.
Jerrold R. Coombs, a professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia,
has published extensively on ethical issues in education and the development of competence
in practical reasoning. His publications include Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford: Black-
well, 1993), co-edited with Earl R. Winkler.
L eRoi B. Daniels, a professor emeritus in the Faculty of Education, University of British
Columbia, is ...
This document provides a lesson plan template for using graphic novels and comics to improve reading comprehension and skills in English language arts and social studies. The template outlines warm-up, individual, small group, and whole class activities centered around analyzing comics using concepts like Bloom's Taxonomy and Gardner's Multiple Intelligences. Key elements of the plan include using graphic organizers to summarize comics, collaborative poster projects, and discussion circles to build literacy and engagement with textual concepts.
The document summarizes a workshop on developing habits of mind in students. The agenda includes introducing habits of mind, focusing on student dispositions towards learning, incorporating habits of mind into curriculum mapping, and engaging students with habits of mind. The document discusses key questions around helping students become effective problem solvers and developing conditions in schools and classrooms to support growth in habits of mind.
The document discusses curriculum planning and involvement from various stakeholders. It argues that all interested parties, including teachers, parents, students, and community members, should be encouraged to collaborate in curriculum planning. This would help address negative stereotypes of teachers and share responsibility for student learning. The document also discusses an TED talk by Sir Ken Robinson about nurturing creativity in education rather than undermining it.
This document discusses higher-order thinking and Bloom's Taxonomy. It provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, which organizes cognitive skills into six categories - knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation - moving from simpler to more complex thinking skills. An example is given applying Bloom's Taxonomy to analyze questions about the Pledge of Allegiance at different cognitive levels. The document also discusses critical/creative/constructive thinking as being closely related and inseparable from higher-order thinking. Several instructional strategies and examples of questions are provided to foster higher-order thinking in the classroom, such as annotating texts, questioning techniques, and writing assignments.
Here is an example using the objective strand you provided:
In order for students to use appropriate mathematical language (symbols, terminology) in both oral and written statements, students must comprehend and use language with accuracy, clarity, and discernment. (ATL Category: Thinking, ATL Cluster: Critical Thinking)
When considering the authentic assessment task, students will need to organize and interpret data and communicate their findings to an audience. Therefore, an additional skill that could be explicitly taught is:
Structure information in summaries, essays and reports. (ATL Category: Communication, ATL Cluster: Communication)
By identifying the key skills needed to successfully complete the task, teachers can ensure students have opportunities to develop those skills through the
Course Project Annotated Bibliography (Part I, Two Annotations requ.docxclayrhr
Course Project: Annotated Bibliography (Part I, Two Annotations required)
Annotated Bibliography Assignment:
This week (Part I) you are to create a complete Annotated Bibliography for 2 academic scholarly sources, which include your introduction and thesis, publication details, and the annotation (see below for examples of each component). In week 4, you will complete this process for 3 additional sources. A total of 5 academic-scholarly sources are required for completion of your final research project.
Scholarship means that
the author has a Ph.D. or other terminal degree,
the work appears in a multi-volume, peer-reviewed journal,
and has ample references at the end.
Good annotations
capture publication details,
offer a student introduction and thesis, and
a detailed reading of the source, covering the following:
Offers the student's introduction and thesis to the best extent s/he knows it at this point in time,
Summarizes key points, and
identifies key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses);
Locates controversies or "problems" raised by the articles;
States whether the student agrees or disagrees and gives reasons;
Locates one or two quotations to be used in the final research project; and
Evaluates the ways in which this article is important and has helped the student to focus his/her understanding.
Example Introduction/Thesis to a Student Paper:
It never ceases to amaze me that we pay so little attention to the greatest bulk of our intelligence—that is, the quality of thinking that helps us adapt, deal with stress, love, and live lives of fulfillment. Aristotle argued that educating the mind and not the heart is no education at all. For decades, educators have focused on cognitive skills because they are testable and, therefore, metrics can be applied to them. This kind of education, testing, and then metrically interpreting results has governed American education for decades. And the results have been losses of creativity, imagination, courtesy, civic interest, and the ability to invent businesses that serve people and advance us as a society. Although measurable skills are important, they are not exclusively important, and in fact lose value when separated from an education in the heart, the spirit, and the abstract qualities that make students fully human and excellent participants in a healthy society.
Example Publication Detail Capture:
Mezirow, J. (2012). Transformative learning as discourse. International Journal of Business & Public Administration.
.
Annotation Example:
In this article, Mezirow makes a distinction between "instrumental" and "communicative" learning. "Instrumental learning" refers to those processes which measure and gage learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. "Communicative learning," on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls "critical-dialectical-discourse," (92) which i.
The document discusses best practices for online discussions, focusing on the three C's of community, construction, and coaching. It provides guidance on building community through establishing a welcoming online presence and netiquette. For construction, it offers tips on structuring discussions, such as using small groups, various question formats, and rubrics for assessment. Regarding coaching, it suggests techniques for facilitating higher-order thinking, providing timely feedback, and addressing weak discussions or incorrect information. The overall goal is to foster student engagement, intellectual development, and connections through strategic use of online discussion tools and facilitation techniques.
DMIL week 3: Cognitive authority and academic textsDrew Whitworth
How do academic texts manifest cognitive authority? Why do we give credibility to papers written in certain ways and not others? This presentation addresses these questions in ways that focus on the question of how you, the MA student, are asked to do this in essays; and, importantly, why we ask you to do so. The issue is a case study of cognitive authority in a specific setting but should therefore also provide practical guidance to you when it comes to thinking about essay writing. I also cover the issue of academic malpractice.
On Slideshare, the audio track embedded in this presentation will be missing.
The document discusses strategies for teaching and assessing critical thinking skills in millennial students. It provides background on Generation X and millennial learners, explaining that millennials are independent problem solvers who want meaningful, stimulating work and quick access to information. The document then outlines several key teaching strategies and self-assessment activities that focus on experiential learning, giving students control and connecting classroom learning to real-world applications. Finally, it presents three methods for assessing critical thinking: a pro/con grid, content/form/function outlining, and analytic memos.
This document provides guidance and strategies for developing higher-level questioning practices to challenge gifted and highly able students. It discusses effective questioning techniques, Bloom's Taxonomy of higher-order thinking skills (analysis, synthesis, evaluation), and models for problem-solving and inquiry-based learning, including prompting questions aligned with each stage. Sample questioning activities and games are proposed to engage students in questioning and develop their critical thinking abilities.
The document provides information on writing with critical analysis. It defines critical analysis as standing back to thoughtfully examine all aspects of a topic from different perspectives rather than accepting information at face value. It emphasizes the importance of critical thinking by asking questions of sources. Examples are given of how to demonstrate critical analysis in academic writing, such as comparing and contrasting literature, evaluating evidence, and synthesizing multiple viewpoints. The document aims to help readers learn how to explain, evaluate, and create writing that incorporates critical analysis.
The PowerPoint presentation that accompanies Elizabeth Birr Moje's keynote speech at the 2010 National Reading Initiative Conference, hosted by the National Writing Project.
Related websites:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~moje
http://www.nwp.org
This presentation has been used to guide workshops on research and academic writing conventions for upperclassman and first-year graduate students. However, it could be adapted for a first and second year student audience. The content is rich, emphasizing reflection, research/inquiry, as well as grammar. This material also demonstrates how to use new media as part of an overall research strategy. The presentation is designed to be presented interactively with writers across the disciplines, multilingual writers, and any writer unfamiliar with the academic writing process. The content is not linear, as many slides could be clipped and customized for integration into a first-year writing course, or even a session or workshop for graduate student writers of any classification.
Similar to Enhancing the 21st century critical thinking skills of ESL/EFL learners (20)
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...Diana Rendina
Librarians are leading the way in creating future-ready citizens – now we need to update our spaces to match. In this session, attendees will get inspiration for transforming their library spaces. You’ll learn how to survey students and patrons, create a focus group, and use design thinking to brainstorm ideas for your space. We’ll discuss budget friendly ways to change your space as well as how to find funding. No matter where you’re at, you’ll find ideas for reimagining your space in this session.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Enhancing the 21st century critical thinking skills of ESL/EFL learners
1. ENHANCING
THE 21ST CENTURY
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS
OF ESL/EFL LEARNERS
Rachel Luna Peralta, LPT,
MM, MA
Macao Institute for Tourism Studies
International Conference on Applied
Linguistics and Literary Studies
November 13-15, 2020
4. CRITICAL THINKING: FROM SCHOOL
TO SOCIETY
“A common complaint is
that entry-level
employees lack the
reasoning and critical
thinking abilities needed
to process and refine
information.” (Hirose, 1992,
para. 1)
5. CRITICAL THINKING: FROM SCHOOL
TO SOCIETY
Critical thinking skills play significant
roles not only in learners’ academic
achievements but also in their dynamic
life of workforce after graduation.
Hirose (1992) claims that numerous
large corporations all over the globe
deal with the lack of basic thinking
skills performed by recent college
graduates in their companies.
10. CRITICAL THINKING: WHAT?
"a process which stresses an attitude of
suspended judgment, incorporates logical
inquiry and problem solving, and leads to
an evaluative decision or action.” - NCTE
Committee on Critical Thinking and the
Language Arts
"critical thinking is reasonable, reflective
thinking that is focused on deciding what
to believe or do.“ (Ennis, 1987)
Involves reflection, analysis, and action
11. CRITICAL THINKING: WHAT?
In terms of its operationalization, critical thinking presumes a
repertoire of faculties:
articulation of ideas;
meaning elicitation;
consideration of divergent arguments and search of
evidence to evaluate the legitimacy of each one;
formulation of hypothesis;
justification of personal arguments and beliefs;
decision making;
problem solving;
monitoring and evaluation of personal cognitions and
actions
12. CRITICAL THINKING: WHY?
Students are too often being
passive receptors of information.
Through technology, the amount
of information available today is
massive.
What is heard (e.g., news reports,
public speakers, conversation) and
what is read (e.g., newspapers,
tabloids, Internet-based material)
is not necessarily accurate nor
free from bias
14. CRITICAL THINKING: WHY?
Critical literacy takes learners beyond the
development of basic literacy skills such as
decoding, predicting, and summarizing and asks
them to become critical consumers of the
information they receive.
Researchers claim that the language classroom
must nurture an environment providing modeling,
rehearsal, and coaching, for students and teachers
alike, to develop a capacity for informed
judgements (Brown, 1984; Hayes & Alvermann,
1986).
16. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
The fundamental points of communicative approach are then
elaborated in the four basic qualities and should be achieved
by the students when learning English.
When speaking, the students are able to find
what is appropriate to say, how it should be
said, and when, in different social situation in
which they find themselves.
When listening, the students can use all
contextual clues to get the meaning of what is
being said and how the message is being
17. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
When reading, the students are able to
construct the meaning based on the
messages provided by the text and in
transaction with genres and their own
reading purposes.
When writing, the students are able to
formulate their ideas into acceptable
written English language in accordance
with the writing situation and their own
writing purposes. (Musthafa, 2001, pp. 3-4, as
18. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
Critical thinking skills have been found
to help English Language Learners in
language acquisition, particularly
through increasing problem-solving
abilities, oral communication skills,
writing competence, and student
motivation.
19. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
However, teaching critical thinking skill is
considered to be a major challenge by many
ELL teachers because of a number of issues,
including students' lack of vocabulary and, in
some cases, students coming from prior
school environments where that skill was not
promoted.” (Ferlazzo, 2016)
20. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
“The inquiry-based approach provides a rich
context for student learning through real-
word questions and problems and allows for
the seamless integration of content standards
and soft skills, technology, critical thinking, as
well as collaboration and communication
through team work.” (Zamacona, 2016, p. 22)
21. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
A. Socratic
Questioning
Questions to clarify
What did you mean by…?
Can you give me an
example?
Could you explain a bit
more?
Questions to challenge assumptions
Why do you assume that…?
Is that always the case?
Why do we include and exclude?
Questions to probe evidence/reasons
What do you think causes this to
happen?
How do you know this?
Why do you say that?
“Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers” –
Voltaire
22. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
A. Socratic
Questioning
Questions to discover other
viewpoints/perspectives
What’s another way to look at this?
What are the advantages and
disadvantages of…?
Who benefits from this? Who would be
affected? What would be their views?
Why is this the best?
Questions that consider implications
and consequences
What are some possible consequences
of this?
How does ~ affect ~?
How does this tie in with what we
already know?
Questions about questions
Why did you ask that question?
What did you mean when you said ~?
What are you trying to find out with
that question?
24. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
B. Bloom’s Taxonomy
http://cfg-ss.businesscatalyst.com/blooms/story_html5.html?fbclid=IwAR3IhV_twaeE36FobDHkb-ylGABZ2c-
af_ehLK8pKRFX2DLWgvqtLrMU6_c
25. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
B. Bloom’s Taxonomy
ABCD Model (Vdovina, 2013)
A – audience
B – behavior
C – condition
D – degree
26. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
B. ABCD Model: Reading a story and
thinking critically
Objective #1: Given the introductory part of the
story for reading (C), students divided into small
groups (A) will evaluate the main hero’s attitude
to the girl and compose (B) one clear and
coherent paragraph of 60 words per group
assessing the hero’s plan to improve the girl’s
intellectual skills (D).A – Audience B – Behavior C – Condition D –
Degree
27. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
B. ABCD Model: Reading a story and thinking
critically
Objective #2: Given one of the two following
parts of the story for skimming and scanning
(C) students divided into two groups (A) will
interpret and explain to each other the _______
(B) in less than 30 words (D).
28. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
B. ABCD Model: Reading a story and
thinking critically
Objective #3: Having read the last part of
the story (C), the students (A) will fill out
the gaps with ____ (D) and justify their
choice in the following discussion (B).
29. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
Thus, the verbs used to
write the objectives
(evaluate, compose,
interpret and explain,
elaborate, justify) can be
attributed to different
levels of the cognitive
domain of the revised
Bloom’s taxonomy
namely, the levels of
Understanding,
Analyzing, Evaluating,
and Creating.
30.
31. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
C. De Bono’s Six Thinking
Hats
https://www.storyboardthat.com/articles/b/six-thinking-
hats-examples
https://www.storyboardthat.com/blog/e/six-thinking-hats-in-
the-classroom
32. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
C. De Bono’s Six Thinking
Hats Discuss problems – piece of literature, current
events, poems, historical moment in time
Analyze a text, movie, book and make students
react, respond, look at various
points/perspectives
Carousel – place the hats at the different parts of
the room and let students walk around and
paste/write their idea on a topic/problem for
each hat/color
Students think outside what they normally think
like
Students dig dip, look at something from
different perspectives – multiple different points
33. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
C. De Bono’s Six Thinking
Hats Case study analysis
Discussion forums
All students, same hat
Different groups, different hats
Different groups, individuals within each group wears the same
hat
Switch hats
Guess the hat
Writing/speaking assignments based on hat color
Stretch it out
Create a new hat
34. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
Cooperative Learning Strategies
Case Study /Discussion Method
Conference Style Learning
Use Writing Assignments
Dialogues
Written dialogues
Spontaneous Group Dialogue
37. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
Attribute Linking—Building Community by Taking
Perspectives
https://www.letitripple.org/education-search/attribute-linking-building-community-by-taking-
perspectives/
Barometer—Taking a Stand on Controversial Issues
https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/teaching-strategies/barometer-taking-stand-
controversial-issues
https://coretools.ldc.org/minitasks/ea34b8d5-578b-48a6-9531-640cc27d4ad9
Big Paper—Building a Silent Conversation
https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/teaching-strategies/big-paper-silent-conversation
Body Sculpting—Using Theatre to Explore Important
Ideas
http://www.cre8iowa.org/2015/10/30/critical-thinking-activities/
Café Conversations
https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/teaching-strategies/cafe-conversations
38. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
Jigsaw—Developing Community and Disseminating
Knowledge
https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/teaching-strategies/jigsaw-developing-community-and-disseminating-knowledge
K-W-L Charts—Assessing What We Know/What We Still
Want to Learn
https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/teaching-strategies/k-w-l-charts
Think, Pair, Share—Facilitating Discussions in Small and
Large Groups
https://www.readingrockets.org/strategies/think-pair-share
http://www.readwritethink.org/professional-development/strategy-guides/using-think-pair-share-
30626.html
Town Hall Circle
https://www.redesignu.org/design-lab/learning-activities/town-hall-circle
Reader’s Theater
https://www.readingrockets.org/article/readers-theater-giving-students-reason-read-aloud
40. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
DOWNLOADABLE LESSONS AND WORKSHEETS
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving - ESL EFL Lessons and
Activities
https://www.teach-this.com/functional-activities-
worksheets/critical-thinking-problem-solving
teAchnology: The Online Teacher Resource Critical Thinking
Worksheets
http://www.teach-nology.com/worksheets/critical_thinking/
41. CRITICAL THINKING: HOW?
ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES
Critical Thinking on the Web: A Directory of Quality
Online Sources
http://www.austhink.com/critical/index.htm
TED Ed Lessons on Critical Thinking
http://ed.ted.com/lessons?category=critical-
thinking
44. CRITICAL THINKING EXERCISE
1. How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?
2. How do you put an elephant into your refrigerator?
3. The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All animals attend
except one. Which animal does not attend?
4. There is a river you must cross but it is used by crocodiles and you
do not have a boat. How do you manage it?
47. REFERENCES
British Council – Teaching English. (2016, December). Larry Ferlazzo: Critical thinking. http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/larry-ferlazzo/larry-ferlazzo-critical-
thinking?utm_source=TE_Facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=bc-teachingenglish
Brown, A. L. (1984). "Teaching students to think as they read: Implications for curriculum reform." Paper commissioned by the American Educational Research Association
Task Force on Excellence in Education,
October 1984. 42pp. [ED 273 567]
Brown, K. (1999). "Developing critical literacy." Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Chong, C. S. (2016, May 16). Critical thinking skills in the classroom: Socrates, Bloom and De Bono. English Teaching Professional.
https://www.etprofessional.com/critical_thinking_skills_in_the_classroom_socrates_bloom_and_de_bono_25769840031.aspx
Ennis, R. (1987). "A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities." In Joan Baron and Robert Sternberg (Eds.) Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and practice. W.H.
Freeman
Halvorsen, A. (2005). Incorporating Critical Thinking Skills Development into ESL/EFL Courses. The Internet TESL Journal, 11 (3). http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Halvorsen-
CriticalThinking.html
Hayes, D. A., & Alvermann, D. E. (1986, April). "Video assisted coaching of textbook discussion skills: Its impact on critical reading behavior." Paper presented at the annual
meeting of the American Research
Association, San Francisco. ED 271 734
Hirose, S. (1992). Critical thinking in community colleges. ERIC Digest. https://www.ericdigests.org/1992-2/critical.htm
Masduqi, H. (2011). Critical thinking skills and meaning in English Language Teaching. TEFLIN Journal 22(2), 185-200. file:///C:/Users/rachel/Downloads/26-80-1-
PB%20(1).pdf
Oxford University Press ELT. (2016, December 15). 21st century skills. https://oupeltglobalblog.com/tag/21st-century-skills/
Oxford University Press ELT. (2013, October 9). Critical Thinking in your lessons – It’s easier than you think! https://oupeltglobalblog.com/2013/10/09/critical-thinking-in-
your-lessons-its-easier-
than-you-think/
Vdovina, E. (2013). Developing critical thinking in the English Language classroom: A lesson plan. ELTA Journal, 1 (1), 54-68. http://eltajournal.org.rs/wp-
content/uploads/2013/12/VII-