28. +
Energy
Total Measure
Goods or services produced
All inputs used to produce them
Input
Output
=
ty
Productivi
Multifactor Productivity
=
Output
Labor
+
Material
+
Overhead
$25/hour))
hours
(2(500
+
68. reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior
written consent of McGraw-Hill Education
1-‹#›
MGT530
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 2
Exceeds
Expectation
Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
69. Requirements Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
70. 21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Content Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.
71. Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.
25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Analysis Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides poor
though, insight,
and analysis of
72. concepts and
applications.
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Sources Sources go above
and beyond
required criteria
and are well
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Sources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
73. chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Sources meet
required criteria
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points
74. Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure, contains
no errors in
grammar, spelling,
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
75. Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure, may
include a few
Project is poorly
organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
76. unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
MGT530
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 2
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style
or APA citations
77. and references.
and APA citations
and references.
Total points possible = 100
MGT-530: – Module 02/CT 01
Regulations:
· GRADING EXPECTATIONS :
1. I recommend that you use the grading rubric to shape your
work product (Attached).
2. With respect to grading, The instructor really looks for 2
things: citations and substance. I encourage you to include cites
and information from scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources in
addition to the course text (Stevenson, W. (2018). Operations
management (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
ISBN-13:9781259667473)
Otherwise, my potential for points is reduced. It indicates you
have read the course materials and searched far and wide for
theories, statistics, and facts to address the issue at hand. I
encourage you to paraphrase these sources. Convert the content
into your own words rather than using direct quotes. This
78. improves the synthesis of information, and it makes the writing
more closely resemble your own style.
In addition to scholarly citations, a substantive assignment is
one that not only answers the question but advances the
discussion. Please, do more than is expected.
· The writer must apply APA style guidelines.
· Support your submission with:
1. Course material concepts, principles, and theories from the
textbook and Use it in the references (Stevenson, W. (2018).
Operations management (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw -
Hill Irwin. ISBN-13:9781259667473)
2. At least Four scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles such
as:
2.1 Zhou, K., Bochtis, D., Jensen, A. L., Kateris, D., &
Sørensen, C. G. (2020). Introduction of a new index of field
operations efficiency. Applied Sciences, 10(1), 329.
2.2 Pilo, M. (2019). Dynamics of Agricultural Productivity and
Technical Efficiency in Togo: The Role of Technological
Change. African Development Review, 31(4), 462–
475. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12403
79. 2.3 Zondo, R. (2020). The influence of inventory sequencing for
the improvement of inventory control: Evidence from a South
African automotive assembly organization. Acta Commercii,
20(1).
· Be 5 pages in length, does not include the title page, abstract,
conclusion and required reference page, which are never a part
of the minimum content requirements.
Operations Management and Factors Affecting Productivity
Maduro Cleaning is a small organization that provides cleaning
services to both residential and commercial clients. As a small
organization, the owner assigns crews of two, three, or four
employees to jobs each morning but the owner does not have a
good method of determining a reasonable amount of time that
each cleaning should take. The owner decided to keep data on
job times and crew sizes in the hopes of developing a
productivity measure.
· In this assignment Address the following requirements:
1. Calculate which of the crew sizes has the best productivity
per worker and explain your method.
2. Evaluateyour outcome and the possible reasons that would
explain those results.
80. 3. Project what the productivity might be for a crew size of five
and explain your reasoning.
· Crew Size Avg: Productivity per Crew
2: 3765 square meters per day
3: 4915 square meters per day
4: 6309 square meters per day
Thank you for your support