The document discusses the justification for monarchies in modern constitutional governments. It argues that monarchies can play an important role in preventing absolutism by allowing different interests in society to participate in government. The document also discusses the concept of a monarch having reserve powers that can be exercised during times of crisis, such as a hung parliament, to stabilize democracy and constitutionalism. These reserve powers are meant to serve as a check on the government and save democracy in cases where other institutions are unable to function properly or deliver good governance.
History and time has shown to human kind that concentrating too much power in the hands to a person further more when this people abuse and are not the ones the power should be concentrated to. History has shown that mankind has been a victim, millions of people died because of the overuse of the political power over passing the amount of power they should have. The case of Hitler, Enver Hoxha, Stalin and other dictators shows that the world should have an order of separation of powers.
The separation of powers is a very important element of judiciary functioning worldwide. In different countries and political systems the separation of powers is done in different ways and different structures. This essay tends to give information about the functioning of the separation of powers in different places.
First of all the essay will give some information about what the separation of powers mean, it will show a short history and the juridical impact of this separation.
What is separation of powers and how is it ineffective in Pakistan?MashifMahboob
THEORY ON PRINCIPLES OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE CONCEPT OF CHECKS AND BALANCES
Its IMPORTANCE, CRITICISM, Clear Distinctions, Role of Legislature, Role of Executive, NAB
Parliament, FIR, Police, Army, Role of Judiciary
Separation of Powers And our Constitution
Judiciary in Contradiction to concept of separation of powers
Powerful beaurucrac hy and Army Intervention, Legislative process and powerful executive in hurdle of applying concept of separation of powers
Policy Recommendation
Conclusion
System of Check and Balances is the balanced system overall.
Montesquieu's Doctrine of Separation of PowerA K DAS's | Law
The main theme of Montesquieu doctrine is that each and every organ of the state will exercise of its own power and function, and no one organ will interfere into the functions of another organ. He is the proponent of this theory....
History and time has shown to human kind that concentrating too much power in the hands to a person further more when this people abuse and are not the ones the power should be concentrated to. History has shown that mankind has been a victim, millions of people died because of the overuse of the political power over passing the amount of power they should have. The case of Hitler, Enver Hoxha, Stalin and other dictators shows that the world should have an order of separation of powers.
The separation of powers is a very important element of judiciary functioning worldwide. In different countries and political systems the separation of powers is done in different ways and different structures. This essay tends to give information about the functioning of the separation of powers in different places.
First of all the essay will give some information about what the separation of powers mean, it will show a short history and the juridical impact of this separation.
What is separation of powers and how is it ineffective in Pakistan?MashifMahboob
THEORY ON PRINCIPLES OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE CONCEPT OF CHECKS AND BALANCES
Its IMPORTANCE, CRITICISM, Clear Distinctions, Role of Legislature, Role of Executive, NAB
Parliament, FIR, Police, Army, Role of Judiciary
Separation of Powers And our Constitution
Judiciary in Contradiction to concept of separation of powers
Powerful beaurucrac hy and Army Intervention, Legislative process and powerful executive in hurdle of applying concept of separation of powers
Policy Recommendation
Conclusion
System of Check and Balances is the balanced system overall.
Montesquieu's Doctrine of Separation of PowerA K DAS's | Law
The main theme of Montesquieu doctrine is that each and every organ of the state will exercise of its own power and function, and no one organ will interfere into the functions of another organ. He is the proponent of this theory....
The Government of Pakistan is a central i.e. Federal government that is established under the constitution of Pakistan. Under the constitution of Pakistan a federal government represents the authority of four provinces and conventional parliamentary democratic state, which is collectively called as the State of Pakistan.
Introduction
Definition
Location
Composition
Qualification of President
Electoral college
Oath
Terms of office of President
Presidential Powers
Authorities of President
Duties of President
Removal of President
Conclusion
Violation of the doctrine of separation of powers and accountability of the j...Kajal Priya
The constitution regulates the structures and functions of the principle organs of the Government. It also regulates relationship between the institutions of the government by setting out balance of power among them. Separation of power is a means to balance the power among these three branches of government. The three branches are Legislative, Executive and Judiciary.
Government give separate powers to all the three branches but at some point the separation of power by government is violated because it is the need of situation. For example; during the time of some internal aggression or attack by any other country state or national emergency has to be applied among the state or country. This also includes the violation of power because during emergency president rule applied on the state or country, state government cannot rule during the emergency. But, in this situation the violation has not been done intentionally therefore this is not called the violation of Doctrine of separation of power. This can be measured by the Check and Balance theory.
The modern design of the doctrine of separation of powers is to be found in the constitutional theory of John Locke (1632-1704).He wrote in his second treaties of Civil Government as follows: “It may be too great a temptation for the humane frailty, apt to grasp at powers, for the same persons who have power of making laws, to have also in their hands the power to execute them, whereby they may exempt themselves from the law, both in its making and execution to their own private advantage” .
Any act done by Executive, Legislative or Judiciary cannot violate the Doctrine of separation of power because on each of these branches there are other two branches to check their acts and decisions given by them. Every branch has to give explanation about their each and every act and decision. Any wrong, unconstitutional or null and void decision taken by them can cause the impeachment order or arbitrary action against them.
This paper talks about the Doctrine of Separation of powers, Definition of Separation of Power, from where this doctrine has been adopted, violation of doctrine of separation of power, steps taken by government to control the violation of Doctrine of SOP . It also discuss the articles under which all the three branches of the government have their separate power. Role of all the three branches of government, relationship between Doctrine of SOP and Judicial Accountability. This paper will also discuss the relationship among all three branches of the Government and accountability of judiciary.
Key words: - Doctrine of SOP, Relationship between Branches of Government (Executive, legislative and Judiciary), Article 53, 245, 246 and other related, Check and balance theory, Accountability of Judiciary.
The Government of Pakistan is a central i.e. Federal government that is established under the constitution of Pakistan. Under the constitution of Pakistan a federal government represents the authority of four provinces and conventional parliamentary democratic state, which is collectively called as the State of Pakistan.
Introduction
Definition
Location
Composition
Qualification of President
Electoral college
Oath
Terms of office of President
Presidential Powers
Authorities of President
Duties of President
Removal of President
Conclusion
Violation of the doctrine of separation of powers and accountability of the j...Kajal Priya
The constitution regulates the structures and functions of the principle organs of the Government. It also regulates relationship between the institutions of the government by setting out balance of power among them. Separation of power is a means to balance the power among these three branches of government. The three branches are Legislative, Executive and Judiciary.
Government give separate powers to all the three branches but at some point the separation of power by government is violated because it is the need of situation. For example; during the time of some internal aggression or attack by any other country state or national emergency has to be applied among the state or country. This also includes the violation of power because during emergency president rule applied on the state or country, state government cannot rule during the emergency. But, in this situation the violation has not been done intentionally therefore this is not called the violation of Doctrine of separation of power. This can be measured by the Check and Balance theory.
The modern design of the doctrine of separation of powers is to be found in the constitutional theory of John Locke (1632-1704).He wrote in his second treaties of Civil Government as follows: “It may be too great a temptation for the humane frailty, apt to grasp at powers, for the same persons who have power of making laws, to have also in their hands the power to execute them, whereby they may exempt themselves from the law, both in its making and execution to their own private advantage” .
Any act done by Executive, Legislative or Judiciary cannot violate the Doctrine of separation of power because on each of these branches there are other two branches to check their acts and decisions given by them. Every branch has to give explanation about their each and every act and decision. Any wrong, unconstitutional or null and void decision taken by them can cause the impeachment order or arbitrary action against them.
This paper talks about the Doctrine of Separation of powers, Definition of Separation of Power, from where this doctrine has been adopted, violation of doctrine of separation of power, steps taken by government to control the violation of Doctrine of SOP . It also discuss the articles under which all the three branches of the government have their separate power. Role of all the three branches of government, relationship between Doctrine of SOP and Judicial Accountability. This paper will also discuss the relationship among all three branches of the Government and accountability of judiciary.
Key words: - Doctrine of SOP, Relationship between Branches of Government (Executive, legislative and Judiciary), Article 53, 245, 246 and other related, Check and balance theory, Accountability of Judiciary.
The only thing that marks India as a democracy is the periodical visits to the polling booths. Government administration, led by the bureaucrats of the Indian Administrative Service, is a synonym for corruption and treason. The politically elected government is just a puppet in the hands of these bureaucrats. And the judiciary is a law unto itself.
PARLIAMENT AND STRUCTURE OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENTTallat Satti
A parliamentary system is a system of democratic governance of a state in which the executive branch derives its democratic legitimacy from, and is held accountable to, the legislature (parliament); the executive and legislative branches are thus interconnected
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
5. Monarchy umbrella for the country.
Montesquieu
Contemporary form of monarchical regime
represented the paradigm of modern govt
whose main features are the presence of law
and SOP as check upon exercise of public
powers which tend to be tainted with abuse.
Monarchical regimes provides security for its
subjects by posting external constraints on
political power.
6. Munro
Position of monarch in modern consti could
be justified with ref to Greek master such as
Aristotle and Plato
These early thinkers held that major interest
in society must be allowed to participate
jointly in govt in order to prevent one
interest(govt) from dominating entirely.
As such monarchies, autocracies and
democracies were allowed to co exist in order
to prevent absolutism.
7. Some may think this institution (monarch)
may not entirely conform with democracy, as
democracy require an election by the people.
But monarch is important as without it,
democracy will be unstable and manipulated
by the those in power.
8. The king will only play its important role when there is
chaos esp when there is hung parliament.
When a general election results in no single political party
winning an overall majority in the House of Commons, this
is known as a situation of no overall control, or a 'hung
Parliament'.
The king actually has reserve power . These powers are
inherent in the office as ultimate guardian or protector of
the state and nation.
One must not discount situation where legal and
legitimate exercise of consti power may lead to difficulties
and crises. This include misuse of power by the govt and
constitutional ideals are being subverted.
In this situation the king may assume the reserve power
and act against or without advice.
9. The idea that this reserve power are given to
the head of state is to save democracy and
the constitutionalism (limited govt) and check
and balance.
One must also not discount the possibility of
other institution being subverted or
prevented from functioning, indirectly or
otherwise.
Thus reserve power is important for no one
can be sure that the constitution would
always be able to function and deliver.
10.
11. St. Augustine that 'an unjust law is no law at
all.' ... An unjust law is a code that is out of
harmony with the moral law. To put it in the
terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is
a human law that is not rooted in eternal law
and natural law. Any law that uplifts human
personality is just.
Likewise any laws that oppress and
destabilize human personality is unjust law.
12.
13.
14. The 1977 emergency declared in the state of
Kelantan, like the Sarawak emergency of 1966, was
confined to a particular state and was likewise
brought about by political squabbles in the State.
However, the approach and administration of the
emergency by the Federal Government in Kelantan
was vastly different from that in Sarawak.
The problem from beginning to end was a struggle
for control of the State Government of Kelantan
between UMNO and the Parti Islam Malaysia (PAS).
The latter were the executives in Kelantan whereas
the former governed at the Federal level.
15. It would appear 'that PAS member secretly
intended to jump party to UMNO. This led to a
crisis within PAS. Although the Menteri Besar,
Dato Mohd. Nasir, and seven other PAS Central
Committee members of like-mind, did not cross-
over to UMNO, it was evident that current CM
had lost the confidence of the majority of the PAS
members in the State legislature. The Menteri
Besar was given an ultimatum by his party to
resign or face a no-confidence motion in the
State assembly where PAS held 22 of the 36
seats. He refused to resign.
16. In this case the Menteri Besar did not resign
but suggested the Regent to dissolve the
Assembly
17. However the Regent did not want to dissolve
SLA. It was then-incumbent on the Menteri
Besar, to tender the resignation of his
Government and call upon some other person
who in his opinion is likely to command the
confidence of the majority in the Assembly to
form a new Government.
18. It was unlikely that the Regent would allow
the State to function without a government.
But the deadlock was allowed to continue
until-8th November 1977 when an
emergency was declared in Kelantan.
19. Since CM refuse to resign the Proclamation
declared that a grave emergency existed
whereby the security or the economic life was
threatened“
With this deadlock, the State will function
without a government