The document discusses the effectiveness of gun control laws in the United States. It notes that mass shootings have increased in the US compared to other nations that enacted stricter gun laws after similar tragedies. While opponents argue that people have a right to self-defense and that people not guns kill people, the document counters that guns make it much easier to kill others in mass shootings and criminals should not have easy access to deadly weapons. It also argues that investing in mental health programs could help address the root causes behind some mass shootings in the US by those suffering from mental illness and depression. Stricter background checks and limiting access to firearms is presented as an effective first step to curb gun violence.
This document discusses gun control in the United States through summarizing recent mass shootings and analyzing arguments around the Second Amendment and gun control legislation. It argues that the Second Amendment intends for state militias like the National Guard, not common citizens, to have access to assault weapons. Stricter background checks could help reduce gun suicides, which account for half of suicide deaths in the US. While an outright ban is impossible, the document suggests tightening existing laws through increased background investigations and waiting periods as most Americans support stronger enforcement of current laws over looser regulations. Overall, the document makes the case that reasonable gun control measures could help reduce violence and save lives in accordance with public opinion.
The document summarizes gun laws in the United States. It discusses that the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms. Federal laws regulate gun sales and ownership but states have additional laws. There are debates around expanding background checks, assault weapons bans, and minimum age requirements given events like school shootings in Parkland, Florida and Sutherland Springs, Texas. The March for Our Lives movement advocated for stricter gun control legislation.
The document discusses several issues related to gun control in the United States. It notes that over 500 children die annually from accidental gunshots. While the Second Amendment protects gun ownership rights, easy access to guns contributes to 30,000 gun deaths per year in the US. The author argues that civilian gun ownership should be abolished and background checks should be required for all gun sales to help address the problems of gun violence and illegal gun trafficking. The document suggests ways for people and lawmakers to help strengthen gun control laws and reduce gun deaths.
The document discusses the growing threat of domestic terrorism in the United States carried out by lone wolf attackers. It argues that easy access to guns, radicalization on the internet, and anti-government sentiments have contributed to homegrown terrorism. Examples given include the Boston Marathon bombing, Fort Hood shooting, and LAX shooting. The author calls for stricter gun control laws and limitations on who can purchase or possess firearms to help address the threat of lone wolf terrorist attacks in America.
The document discusses both sides of the gun control debate in America. It outlines the arguments from the National Rifle Association (NRA) who support fewer gun regulations and greater access to firearms. It also discusses the positions of groups like Brady who favor stricter gun laws and limitations on firearms. The document considers the debate around the definition of a "well-regulated militia" and questions whether modern firearms are covered by the Second Amendment. It concludes by taking the position that stricter background checks, limits on magazine capacity, and bans on assault weapons could help reduce gun violence in America.
This document discusses gun control and presents arguments for increased regulation of firearms. It notes that the types of weapons available today fire much faster than muskets from the 18th century. While some argue that increased controls won't help, the document asserts that making guns harder to obtain could reduce mass shootings and other gun violence. It calls for universal background checks, addressing mental health issues, and allowing health providers to report on patients' gun ownership. The document aims to invite people to support increased regulation and join Moms for Gun Control on Facebook.
This power point goes a little more in depth then the paper. As well as covers more area.
The paper is what I did for you your class.
this power point is one I did for Physiology 101.
This document discusses gun control in the United States through summarizing recent mass shootings and analyzing arguments around the Second Amendment and gun control legislation. It argues that the Second Amendment intends for state militias like the National Guard, not common citizens, to have access to assault weapons. Stricter background checks could help reduce gun suicides, which account for half of suicide deaths in the US. While an outright ban is impossible, the document suggests tightening existing laws through increased background investigations and waiting periods as most Americans support stronger enforcement of current laws over looser regulations. Overall, the document makes the case that reasonable gun control measures could help reduce violence and save lives in accordance with public opinion.
The document summarizes gun laws in the United States. It discusses that the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms. Federal laws regulate gun sales and ownership but states have additional laws. There are debates around expanding background checks, assault weapons bans, and minimum age requirements given events like school shootings in Parkland, Florida and Sutherland Springs, Texas. The March for Our Lives movement advocated for stricter gun control legislation.
The document discusses several issues related to gun control in the United States. It notes that over 500 children die annually from accidental gunshots. While the Second Amendment protects gun ownership rights, easy access to guns contributes to 30,000 gun deaths per year in the US. The author argues that civilian gun ownership should be abolished and background checks should be required for all gun sales to help address the problems of gun violence and illegal gun trafficking. The document suggests ways for people and lawmakers to help strengthen gun control laws and reduce gun deaths.
The document discusses the growing threat of domestic terrorism in the United States carried out by lone wolf attackers. It argues that easy access to guns, radicalization on the internet, and anti-government sentiments have contributed to homegrown terrorism. Examples given include the Boston Marathon bombing, Fort Hood shooting, and LAX shooting. The author calls for stricter gun control laws and limitations on who can purchase or possess firearms to help address the threat of lone wolf terrorist attacks in America.
The document discusses both sides of the gun control debate in America. It outlines the arguments from the National Rifle Association (NRA) who support fewer gun regulations and greater access to firearms. It also discusses the positions of groups like Brady who favor stricter gun laws and limitations on firearms. The document considers the debate around the definition of a "well-regulated militia" and questions whether modern firearms are covered by the Second Amendment. It concludes by taking the position that stricter background checks, limits on magazine capacity, and bans on assault weapons could help reduce gun violence in America.
This document discusses gun control and presents arguments for increased regulation of firearms. It notes that the types of weapons available today fire much faster than muskets from the 18th century. While some argue that increased controls won't help, the document asserts that making guns harder to obtain could reduce mass shootings and other gun violence. It calls for universal background checks, addressing mental health issues, and allowing health providers to report on patients' gun ownership. The document aims to invite people to support increased regulation and join Moms for Gun Control on Facebook.
This power point goes a little more in depth then the paper. As well as covers more area.
The paper is what I did for you your class.
this power point is one I did for Physiology 101.
This document discusses debates around regulating journalists' free speech. It notes that some argue regulation could increase security by limiting reports that encourage terrorism, while others argue regulations infringe on free speech. The document also discusses countries that have arrested or killed journalists for reports seen as threatening. Overall, it weighs the benefits of regulated speech in preventing violence against the risks of limiting free expression.
How media influence American peoples' gun awareness?優姫 塚八
This document discusses how media influences Americans' perceptions of gun violence. The author hypothesizes that (1) Americans feel driven by fear from news coverage that overstates rising gun deaths, even as deaths decrease; (2) advertisements imply guns are easily obtainable, though regulations vary by state; and (3) the NRA urges gun ownership. The author outlines a graduation thesis on this topic, examining statistics on gun deaths and mass shootings, gun control laws and public opinions, and media influences through news, documentaries and advertising.
This document summarizes the increasing militarization of local police forces in the United States. It notes that police are receiving military equipment like armored vehicles, assault rifles, and drones through federal programs. Their training also focuses more on military tactics like "no-knock" raids. This has contributed to over 5,000 Americans being killed by police since 9/11, more than the number of US casualties in the Iraq war. The document argues this turns police into a "standing army" that threatens civil liberties, as seen in incidents of police violence against non-violent citizens.
This document discusses gun control policies around the world and in the US. It provides examples of countries that ban civilian gun ownership or have restrictive policies, such as Russia, Germany, France, China and the UK. The US is contrasted as having more lax gun laws and high rates of civilian gun ownership. The document outlines pros of gun control like reduced deaths and violence, and cons like reduced self defense ability. It advocates for stricter gun control policies in the US, including universal background checks, age limits, safety training requirements, and restrictions on types and numbers of guns owned.
This document discusses two opposing views on the United States' relationship with international law and institutions like the International Criminal Court. One view is that the US fails to uphold the same human rights standards it demands of other countries. The other view is that powerful democracies like the US have a right to intervene militarily without UN approval to spread democracy, as with NATO actions in Kosovo and Serbia. The document argues the US damages its credibility by resisting international oversight and that world peace requires subjecting all countries, including the US, to international criminal law.
This document summarizes a research paper on the gun debate in America. It outlines the key issues debated, including the interpretation of the Second Amendment and whether private gun ownership increases safety. It also summarizes the main arguments from supporters of stricter gun laws, which include reducing gun violence, and opponents, which include concerns about restricting constitutional rights. Potential policy alternatives like assault weapons bans and gun registration are discussed.
Panelists from Brown University's Watson Institute and the U.S. Naval War College discussed the growing divide between civilians and the military (the civil-military gap) and its implications. This gap has lessened the effectiveness of the military and made it easier for political leaders to take the country to war. Suggestions to bridge this gap included encouraging more veteran representation in public office, having the military play a more active role in policymaking, and reforming military recruiting and education to increase understanding between civilians and the armed forces. However, some panelists noted that the nature of warfare is changing and victories may be more difficult to define against non-state actors.
Исследование было проведено по заказу Международного Комитета Красного Креста (МККК) компанией Ipsos. Опрос проводился с 1 июня по 7 октября 2019 г. с использованием комбинированных методов; всего было опрошено 16 288 взрослых в возрасте 20–35 лет из 16 перечисленных ниже стран. Афганистан, Израиль, Индонезия, Колумбия, Малайзия, Мексика, Нигерия, оккупированные палестинские территории, Россия, Сирия, Соединенное Королевство, США, Украина, Франция, Швейцария и ЮАР.
2021 open letter from retired generals and admEdouardHusson
120 généraux en retraite de l'armée américaine publient une tribune dans laquelle ils ne se contentent pas de critiquer la politique du nouveau gouvernement. Ils expriment leurs doutes sur la capacité physique de Joe Biden à exercer ses fonctions de chef des armées
A NUCLEAR FREE WORLD OR A WORLD RIDDLED WITH NUCLEAR TERRORISM – ANALYSISKeshav Prasad Bhattarai
This document analyzes the growing threat of nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism. It discusses North Korea's recent third nuclear test and their advancing nuclear weapons program. It argues that as technology progresses, nuclear weapons are becoming smaller, cheaper, and easier to obtain, increasing the risk that they could fall into dangerous hands. A nuclear-free world is urgently needed to prevent catastrophic nuclear war or terrorism, and with continued arms reductions it may be possible to achieve.
President Obama personally oversees a secret "kill list" of individuals targeted for assassination without trial, including American citizens. The President reviews this list with senior advisors every Tuesday and decides who will be targeted in drone strikes. This practice violates U.S. and international law, which require due process or congressional approval for the use of lethal force. The author argues that Obama has established secret national security systems that operate outside the Constitution and rule of law.
This document is a chapter from a book on concealed carry for beginners. It discusses the history and rationale for the individual right to bear arms in the United States based on the Second Amendment and English common law tradition. The chapter argues that carrying a gun is both an absolute right of individuals and a duty of citizens to contribute to community security. It cites evidence that states with concealed carry laws have lower crime rates than those without such laws.
NORTH AMERICAN CULTURE OF WHITE SUPREMACYMurphy Browne
White supremacy in North America is a culture that has been practiced since the first group of white people arrived in this part of the world and continues to this day in the 21st century. It has morphed from the blatant murder of the indigenous people and the barbaric enslavement of Africans for centuries to today where white police routinely kill unarmed African American men, women and children without being held accountable.
The document discusses gun control in Michigan and argues against further restrictions. It asserts that gun control violates Second Amendment rights and that law-abiding citizens should be able to own guns for hunting, protection, and to prevent government overreach as the founding fathers intended. While some regulation is needed, more restrictions will not stop criminals from getting guns and will only limit the rights of lawful citizens to own firearms. The document provides historical context regarding the intentions of the Second Amendment and debates around gun control policies in Michigan.
This document summarizes research on homelessness among veterans. It finds that veterans who served during peacetime after the Korean War and before the Vietnam War have disproportionately high rates of homelessness compared to other veterans and non-veterans. Research identifies a cohort of veterans who joined the military after 1974 under the new all-volunteer force as being particularly at risk. Risk factors for this group include lower socioeconomic backgrounds, fewer family ties, and higher rates of behavioral issues and substance abuse prior to service. The research also shows that older veterans, unmarried veterans, and those without VA compensation or Medicaid are additionally vulnerable to homelessness.
This document discusses the ethical and legal issues surrounding US soldiers encountering child soldiers in combat situations. It provides background on how child soldiers are used in conflicts in Africa and the trauma experienced by US soldiers who have faced armed children. The document examines the current US military approach to dealing with child soldiers, which focuses on non-lethal tactics but may require lethal force in some cases. It outlines international laws and treaties prohibiting the use of child soldiers. The document also evaluates the ethical justifications for US intervention and considerations around the responsibility to protect civilians from human rights abuses. It argues that greater interagency cooperation during military operations could help address the root causes of why children become soldiers and reduce the need for lethal force against them
This document provides a lesson plan on crime and punishment in democratic societies. It discusses student objectives such as understanding how democracies define and punish crimes. It also examines different views on the death penalty and its purposes. The reading material presents four criminal cases and discusses capital punishment in democracies around the world. It analyzes retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as rationales for the death penalty and notes religious and international views on the issue. The lesson concludes with a question for student deliberation on whether the democracy should ban capital punishment.
The document outlines Michael Moore's film Bowling for Columbine and examines American attitudes towards guns. It shows how easy it is to obtain guns from banks and bullets from hair salons. Despite school shootings like Columbine, the NRA continues promoting pro-gun stances. Experts blamed outside influences like music instead of the widespread gun culture. Comparisons show the US has far more gun deaths than other countries due to long-held fears and the belief that guns provide protection and independence rather than danger. The news exploits these fears for profit through exaggerated crime stories.
This document discusses debates around regulating journalists' free speech. It notes that some argue regulation could increase security by limiting reports that encourage terrorism, while others argue regulations infringe on free speech. The document also discusses countries that have arrested or killed journalists for reports seen as threatening. Overall, it weighs the benefits of regulated speech in preventing violence against the risks of limiting free expression.
How media influence American peoples' gun awareness?優姫 塚八
This document discusses how media influences Americans' perceptions of gun violence. The author hypothesizes that (1) Americans feel driven by fear from news coverage that overstates rising gun deaths, even as deaths decrease; (2) advertisements imply guns are easily obtainable, though regulations vary by state; and (3) the NRA urges gun ownership. The author outlines a graduation thesis on this topic, examining statistics on gun deaths and mass shootings, gun control laws and public opinions, and media influences through news, documentaries and advertising.
This document summarizes the increasing militarization of local police forces in the United States. It notes that police are receiving military equipment like armored vehicles, assault rifles, and drones through federal programs. Their training also focuses more on military tactics like "no-knock" raids. This has contributed to over 5,000 Americans being killed by police since 9/11, more than the number of US casualties in the Iraq war. The document argues this turns police into a "standing army" that threatens civil liberties, as seen in incidents of police violence against non-violent citizens.
This document discusses gun control policies around the world and in the US. It provides examples of countries that ban civilian gun ownership or have restrictive policies, such as Russia, Germany, France, China and the UK. The US is contrasted as having more lax gun laws and high rates of civilian gun ownership. The document outlines pros of gun control like reduced deaths and violence, and cons like reduced self defense ability. It advocates for stricter gun control policies in the US, including universal background checks, age limits, safety training requirements, and restrictions on types and numbers of guns owned.
This document discusses two opposing views on the United States' relationship with international law and institutions like the International Criminal Court. One view is that the US fails to uphold the same human rights standards it demands of other countries. The other view is that powerful democracies like the US have a right to intervene militarily without UN approval to spread democracy, as with NATO actions in Kosovo and Serbia. The document argues the US damages its credibility by resisting international oversight and that world peace requires subjecting all countries, including the US, to international criminal law.
This document summarizes a research paper on the gun debate in America. It outlines the key issues debated, including the interpretation of the Second Amendment and whether private gun ownership increases safety. It also summarizes the main arguments from supporters of stricter gun laws, which include reducing gun violence, and opponents, which include concerns about restricting constitutional rights. Potential policy alternatives like assault weapons bans and gun registration are discussed.
Panelists from Brown University's Watson Institute and the U.S. Naval War College discussed the growing divide between civilians and the military (the civil-military gap) and its implications. This gap has lessened the effectiveness of the military and made it easier for political leaders to take the country to war. Suggestions to bridge this gap included encouraging more veteran representation in public office, having the military play a more active role in policymaking, and reforming military recruiting and education to increase understanding between civilians and the armed forces. However, some panelists noted that the nature of warfare is changing and victories may be more difficult to define against non-state actors.
Исследование было проведено по заказу Международного Комитета Красного Креста (МККК) компанией Ipsos. Опрос проводился с 1 июня по 7 октября 2019 г. с использованием комбинированных методов; всего было опрошено 16 288 взрослых в возрасте 20–35 лет из 16 перечисленных ниже стран. Афганистан, Израиль, Индонезия, Колумбия, Малайзия, Мексика, Нигерия, оккупированные палестинские территории, Россия, Сирия, Соединенное Королевство, США, Украина, Франция, Швейцария и ЮАР.
2021 open letter from retired generals and admEdouardHusson
120 généraux en retraite de l'armée américaine publient une tribune dans laquelle ils ne se contentent pas de critiquer la politique du nouveau gouvernement. Ils expriment leurs doutes sur la capacité physique de Joe Biden à exercer ses fonctions de chef des armées
A NUCLEAR FREE WORLD OR A WORLD RIDDLED WITH NUCLEAR TERRORISM – ANALYSISKeshav Prasad Bhattarai
This document analyzes the growing threat of nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism. It discusses North Korea's recent third nuclear test and their advancing nuclear weapons program. It argues that as technology progresses, nuclear weapons are becoming smaller, cheaper, and easier to obtain, increasing the risk that they could fall into dangerous hands. A nuclear-free world is urgently needed to prevent catastrophic nuclear war or terrorism, and with continued arms reductions it may be possible to achieve.
President Obama personally oversees a secret "kill list" of individuals targeted for assassination without trial, including American citizens. The President reviews this list with senior advisors every Tuesday and decides who will be targeted in drone strikes. This practice violates U.S. and international law, which require due process or congressional approval for the use of lethal force. The author argues that Obama has established secret national security systems that operate outside the Constitution and rule of law.
This document is a chapter from a book on concealed carry for beginners. It discusses the history and rationale for the individual right to bear arms in the United States based on the Second Amendment and English common law tradition. The chapter argues that carrying a gun is both an absolute right of individuals and a duty of citizens to contribute to community security. It cites evidence that states with concealed carry laws have lower crime rates than those without such laws.
NORTH AMERICAN CULTURE OF WHITE SUPREMACYMurphy Browne
White supremacy in North America is a culture that has been practiced since the first group of white people arrived in this part of the world and continues to this day in the 21st century. It has morphed from the blatant murder of the indigenous people and the barbaric enslavement of Africans for centuries to today where white police routinely kill unarmed African American men, women and children without being held accountable.
The document discusses gun control in Michigan and argues against further restrictions. It asserts that gun control violates Second Amendment rights and that law-abiding citizens should be able to own guns for hunting, protection, and to prevent government overreach as the founding fathers intended. While some regulation is needed, more restrictions will not stop criminals from getting guns and will only limit the rights of lawful citizens to own firearms. The document provides historical context regarding the intentions of the Second Amendment and debates around gun control policies in Michigan.
This document summarizes research on homelessness among veterans. It finds that veterans who served during peacetime after the Korean War and before the Vietnam War have disproportionately high rates of homelessness compared to other veterans and non-veterans. Research identifies a cohort of veterans who joined the military after 1974 under the new all-volunteer force as being particularly at risk. Risk factors for this group include lower socioeconomic backgrounds, fewer family ties, and higher rates of behavioral issues and substance abuse prior to service. The research also shows that older veterans, unmarried veterans, and those without VA compensation or Medicaid are additionally vulnerable to homelessness.
This document discusses the ethical and legal issues surrounding US soldiers encountering child soldiers in combat situations. It provides background on how child soldiers are used in conflicts in Africa and the trauma experienced by US soldiers who have faced armed children. The document examines the current US military approach to dealing with child soldiers, which focuses on non-lethal tactics but may require lethal force in some cases. It outlines international laws and treaties prohibiting the use of child soldiers. The document also evaluates the ethical justifications for US intervention and considerations around the responsibility to protect civilians from human rights abuses. It argues that greater interagency cooperation during military operations could help address the root causes of why children become soldiers and reduce the need for lethal force against them
This document provides a lesson plan on crime and punishment in democratic societies. It discusses student objectives such as understanding how democracies define and punish crimes. It also examines different views on the death penalty and its purposes. The reading material presents four criminal cases and discusses capital punishment in democracies around the world. It analyzes retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as rationales for the death penalty and notes religious and international views on the issue. The lesson concludes with a question for student deliberation on whether the democracy should ban capital punishment.
The document outlines Michael Moore's film Bowling for Columbine and examines American attitudes towards guns. It shows how easy it is to obtain guns from banks and bullets from hair salons. Despite school shootings like Columbine, the NRA continues promoting pro-gun stances. Experts blamed outside influences like music instead of the widespread gun culture. Comparisons show the US has far more gun deaths than other countries due to long-held fears and the belief that guns provide protection and independence rather than danger. The news exploits these fears for profit through exaggerated crime stories.
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Preliminary findings _OECD field visits to ten regions in the TSI EU mining r...OECDregions
Preliminary findings from OECD field visits for the project: Enhancing EU Mining Regional Ecosystems to Support the Green Transition and Secure Mineral Raw Materials Supply.
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 38
Effectivness of-gun-control essay
1. Running head: EFFECTIVENESS OF GUN CONTROL 1
Effectiveness of Gun Control
Name of Student
Institutional Affiliation
2. EFFECTIVENESS OF GUN CONTROL 2
Effectiveness of Gun Control
At the beginning of 2019, at least 17 people died in or around Marjory Stoneman Douglas
High School in the town of Parkland, south of the state of Florida. Nikolas Cruz, armed with an
AR-15 assault rifle, fired at the students and staff of the school. Mass shootings have been on the
increase in America. This epidemic of massacres, this scourge of school shootings after school
shootings, only happens in the U.S.A. However, it is not a simple coincidence or bad luck, but
because of lack of action. There are nations like Scotland and Australia, which in the past
experienced similar tragedies, but enacted laws to strictly control the bearing of arms. The results
are obvious for all to see: since the new gun laws were enacted in Australia, there has been no
school shooting since 1996. While in Scotland, where a shooting took place in an elementary
school that same year, gun control - which extended to the United Kingdom - has reduced gun
crime by 75% in the last decade. Availability of guns amongst the public has increased mass
shooting and other gun related killings in the USA, calling for the revision and application of the
current gun control law.
There are several fundamental arguments against gun control. The first is based on the
idea that people have a fundamental right to self-defense against common criminals (Coates &
Pearson‐Merkowitzz, 2017). That is, in a world where criminals have access to legal or illegal
weapons, ordinary people should be able to arm themselves to defend themselves.
Another argument raised by opposers is that it is people who kill people, not guns.
However, it is crucial to observe that the ease in which guns are available has also made it easier
for shooters to kill innocent people. It is for this reason why the Second Amendment was
specifically enacted to deal with guns rather than knives or bombs. At the end of the 18th
century, however, the idea that a permanent army was a grave danger to any society was much
3. EFFECTIVENESS OF GUN CONTROL 3
more common. The arguments of the 18th century behind the Second Amendment, of course,
always focused on providing control over the power of the military power of the central
government. These arguments go back far beyond the Declaration of Independence, at least until
the days of the English civil war. In the 1660s, it was agreed that troops were necessary to
maintain order, but few entrusted the task to the central government. Thus, a national militia
composed of civilians who, as in the early days, would be summoned in times of need.
The idea of the militia was always subordinated to the belief that a considerable
permanent federal army was a threat to American freedoms, and that outside the Navy, the
military force should be decentralized and subject to state and local control. These militias - once
called to service - used to be subject to the control of government officials, whether at the local
or state level. However, it was often assumed that the ranks of the militia would be occupied by
resident experts in the use of their private weapons. This also meant private ownership of
weapons. Besides, it assumed ownership of the weapons - and their dominance - at the level of
military unity.
The idea of militias as control over standing armies is still important because the
defenders of gun control are now specifically pointing to the argument of the defense against
tyrants in their campaign to further criminalize the possession of weapons. In all the mass
shootings in America, the weapon of choice was guns. It is much easier and faster to kill people
with a gun compared to killing people with a baseball bat. The idea that it is wrong to prevent
Americans from getting any guns they want just because they could easily access other weapons
is nonsensical. Killers should not be given more options for weapons to kill others.
The other argument in favor of private ownership of weapons is the argument that
weapons must be owned by a considerable portion of the population as a defense against an
4. EFFECTIVENESS OF GUN CONTROL 4
abusive government. This argument depends to a large extent on the demonstration that a
permanent army controlled by the federal government is a threat to freedom.
The American government should not only invest money in gun control but also invest
more money in mental health. On 20th
April, 1999, two students, Eric Harris (who was 18 years
old) and Dylan Klebold (who was 17 years old), came to their school with an assortment of
heavy weapons. The heavily armed 17 and 18-year-olds shot dead twelve comrades and a teacher
in a matter of minutes before committing suicide in the library. Harris and Klebold's motives
were never clarified. However, some point to the fact that they suffered from depression. On 21st
March 2005, a 16 year old student by the name Jeffrey Weise shot nine people. He shot his
grandfather and five other students who were students of a high school in Red Lake, Minnesota.
He ended up committing suicide after an exchange of fire with the police. According to the press,
the teenager was depressed and tried to end his life in May 2004.
Cho Seung-Hui, a student originally from South Korea and a student at the University of
Virginia and a victim of bullying, killed 32 people on the campus where he studied. He wounded
another 29 in what is remembered today as the worst massacre in an American university. With
an extensive history of mental problems, Seung-Hui was admitted to a psychiatric institution.
Paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and psychopathy were some of the disorders he
suffered and were not known until after the killing. In all these cases, the shooters had mental
problems and were depressed. It is, therefore, crucial for the state to invest money and resources
in the mental education of its students. Parents and family members should pay attention to
adolescent behavior, especially when showing isolation and marked mood swings.
5. EFFECTIVENESS OF GUN CONTROL 5
Conclusion
On average, in America, 106 people are killed with firearms every day, and 38,658 died
from firearms in 2016 alone. This is a full-fledged human rights crisis that does not seem to want
or be addressed. The first step to prevent weapons from falling into dangerous hands is to take
common-sense preventive measures such as thorough background checks of people who want to
buy weapons. It is proven to work: states with these laws have significantly lower arms
trafficking. In 2019, there have been more than 40 attacks. Many of them have ended the lives of
people, but not all appear in the news. Each carries a dramatic history of violence that arouses a
heated debate about the possession of weapons throughout the world. There is need to constrain
weapon viciousness by actualizing the prohibitive laws to claim and utilize a gun.
6. EFFECTIVENESS OF GUN CONTROL 6
References
Coates, M., & Pearson‐Merkowitzz, S. (2017). Policy Spillover and Gun Migration: The
interstate dynamics of state gun control policies. Social Science Quarterly, 98(2), 500-
512.
Kwon, I. W. G., & Baack, D. W. (2005). The effectiveness of legislation controlling gun usage: a
holistic measure of gun control legislation. American Journal of Economics and
Sociology, 64(2), 533-547.
Masters, J. (2016). US gun policy: global comparisons. Council on Foreign Relations.
Masters, J. (2016). US gun policy: global comparisons. Council on Foreign Relations.
Pathak, P. (2017). The UN System and the Non-Governmental Organisations. Kathmandu Sch.
L. Rev., 5, 153.