CraftinganEffectiveTalent
ManagementStrategy(Practice2)
How to assess talent management needs and
aspirationstoestablishbestpracticestotarget.
PracticeGuide
TALENT
MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY
OVERVIEW
As a company de
fi
nes its business strategy, each
function must align its objectives and actions to
support its strategic goals. Talent management
strategy is a key process that the HR function follows
to accomplish this directive by identifying priorities
and setting up plans to advance talent management
practices. It is directly enabling corporate strategy. It is
a compass to decide how to design and prioritize
talent management and other HR programs, services,
and policies and guide how they should mature over
time.
This process follows a periodic cycle, typically
conducted on an annual basis, where the HR team
analyzes current and future business and organizational
needs, reviews its talent management programs and
practices to assess if they respond adequately to those
needs, and identi
fi
es adjustments.
Whatitis
3
These improvements may enhance the effectiveness
and ef
fi
ciency of services provided in response to
regulatory, operational, technological, or employee
experience opportunity areas.
Talent management strategy is different from “Talent
Strategy”, which includes looking into business
requirements in terms of the capabilities required by
the organization, the ways to access them in the
market, and their development, maintenance, and
retention. It is also distinct from “HR Strategy”, which
focuses on de
fi
ning how to organize and operate the
HR function, as well as determining what processes,
policies, and services will be part of it at any given
stage.
Talent management strategy is useful for prioritizing
time and investment decisions on the most important
initiatives for the organization, not only the most
urgent. It is an overarching plan that encompasses all
talent management areas, helping align the HR agenda
with the business strategy.
It allows HR teams and key stakeholders across the
business to collaborate and agree on main objectives
and a roadmap of improvement initiatives.
The scope typically comprises programs supporting
the worker life cycle, which involves attracting,
accessing, engaging, managing, augmenting,
developing, and transitioning talent. Nevertheless, the
process creates the opportunity to holistically review
other areas driven by HR to evaluate and improve.
Whyuseit
4
Assessing talent management
needs and aspirations to
establishbestpracticestotarget.
PRACTICE
GUIDE L1
Progression
Implementing a new or improving an existing HR
program, which has been preselected as a prioritized
focus area, requires identifying or de
fi
ning the right
types of practices that will help achieve the desired
outcomes for the program.
Wowledge packages the practices necessary to
implement new programs from scratch or advance
them from an existing stage across different levels of
sophistication, helping fast-track this process. This is
illustrated in the applicable practices for key HR
programs included in Wowledge’s catalog.
Alternatively, a systematic approach can be put in
place when other or highly customized practices need
to be considered as follows.
Howitworks
6
Revisiting data from prior analysis of the business
strategy will be fundamental. This might include KPIs,
and organizational needs, with particular attention to
employee surveys and comments, feedback, and
anecdotal information from interactions with top
leadership, managers, and internal customers
throughout the year. This information aids in creating
a preliminary list of potential practices or improvement
initiatives per focus area. This list might contain a mix
of practices with some included in Wowledge’s
progressions and others newly identi
fi
ed through this
approach.
Research is necessary to complement the preliminary
list, ideally with recognized best practices to
implement the corresponding HR program. Research
methods include asking consultants or specialists,
reviewing expert articles or books, and exploring
credible online sources.
Review quantitative and qualitative
data inputs
Fine-tuning a more robust and speci
fi
c list of
improvement initiatives results from targeted
conversations with key company stakeholders.
The best way to obtain valuable and structured
feedback during these interactions is guiding the
conversation with standardized questions or a
questionnaire covering the following elements for
each targeted talent management program in scope:
a. Full description of the program and what the
expected outcome(s) are for the organization. This
serves to open the discussion to align understanding
and uncover if stakeholders have different
expectations that should be addressed.
b. Preliminary list of practices or improvement
initiatives to implement for the program. The intent
is asking probing questions to help validate or expand
the list, together with assessing which speci
fi
c
initiatives might be the most relevant.
7
c. Questions to gather views on program
interdependencies or particular challenges with
respect to making the desired improvements. This
will help understand linkages among programs and
other key considerations.
d. Stakeholders who should be involved in the design
or implementation of each speci
fi
c program or
initiative. Discussing potential participants helps
make sure the entire process will have the buy-in
from the key people in the organization and, in some
cases, identi
fi
es supporting resources.
This exercise yields both quantitative and qualitative
data to not only create a fuller list of improvement
initiatives but to also get a sense for which of those
practices might be the most relevant to set adequate
and achievable aspirations for the improvement cycle.
8
Compiling a complete list of practices for each HR
program takes collaboration and diverse sources. As
such, each practice has different levels of complexity
to execute. In addition, some initiatives might already
be in place in part or would be set aside to consider at
a later stage.
It is best to organize and classify the practices into
levels of sophistication to make it easier to de
fi
ne
appropriate aspirations to start working towards and
track how the organization might be progressing
towards implementing more robust practices over
time.
An effective framework to use is classifying practices
into three levels of progression, the way Wowledge
structures its expert-developed practices, considering
the following criteria:
-Level 1 Practices: The core, or most fundamental
practices that are considered the building blocks.
These will be less complex and without signi
fi
cant
investments or skillsets to implement.
-Level 2 Practices: The advanced, or more mature
practices considered the next level of sophistication.
These might require using technologies and already
basic practices in place.
-Level 3 Practices: The emerging or leading practices
that might involve the latest HR thinking. These
highly sophisticated practices might require
leveraging more complex technologies, models, or
skillsets.
De
fi
ne current state and desired
practices
9
After classifying practices into their corresponding
levels, it will be relevant to identify if any are already in
place to some degree in the organization. At this stage,
the objective is to determine what practices to
consider targeting for the improvement cycle as an
aspiration.
The “Targeting Aspiring Practices Template” helps
organize practices and complete such assessment.
Typically, all HR functional leaders (e.g., recruitment,
learning and development, compensation, and HR
operations) take part in the process to assess the state
of each program and practices, de
fi
ne aspirations, and
identify gaps. Feedback from stakeholders and
employees also serves as a key input to the diagnostic
process.
Wowledge is the expert-driven platform for lean
teams building modern HR programs. Members
enjoy access to up-to-date best practices, step-
by-step guides, tools, templates, and insights to
accelerate the design and implementation of all
key HR programs and processes.
Since each organization has unique characteristics,
needs, and aspirations, Wowledge's practices are
developed utilizing an exclusive stage-based
approach – from Core to Advanced to Emerging
– that reflects distinct levels of sophistication to
meet our members where they are.
About
Wowledge
GET STARTED
FOR FREE!
Visit Wowledge.com to learn more
and become a Guest for Free.
Legal disclaimer
This document and any content included is provided to you on an as-is basis without any representations or
warranties of any kind.
No recipient of content from this document should act, refrain from acting or make any decisions on the basis
of any content included. Wowledge or its licensors shall not be responsible or liable for the use, accuracy, or
usefulness of any content transmitted or made available via this document, and shall not be responsible or
liable for any action, refraining from action or decisions made based on such content.
Wowledge does not warrant that any defects or errors will be corrected. Any content obtained in connection
with this document is at your own risk and you will be solely responsible for any damage or any other
liabilities or damages that result from such use.
Wowledge takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for the content included in this document. You
understand and agree that you may be exposed to content that is inaccurate, objectionable, inappropriate,
unreliable, or otherwise unsuited to your purpose.
All contents copyright © 2023 by Wowledge. All rights reserved.

Effective Talent Management Strategy: Assessing Needs and Aspirations

  • 1.
    CraftinganEffectiveTalent ManagementStrategy(Practice2) How to assesstalent management needs and aspirationstoestablishbestpracticestotarget. PracticeGuide
  • 2.
  • 3.
    As a companyde fi nes its business strategy, each function must align its objectives and actions to support its strategic goals. Talent management strategy is a key process that the HR function follows to accomplish this directive by identifying priorities and setting up plans to advance talent management practices. It is directly enabling corporate strategy. It is a compass to decide how to design and prioritize talent management and other HR programs, services, and policies and guide how they should mature over time. This process follows a periodic cycle, typically conducted on an annual basis, where the HR team analyzes current and future business and organizational needs, reviews its talent management programs and practices to assess if they respond adequately to those needs, and identi fi es adjustments. Whatitis 3 These improvements may enhance the effectiveness and ef fi ciency of services provided in response to regulatory, operational, technological, or employee experience opportunity areas. Talent management strategy is different from “Talent Strategy”, which includes looking into business requirements in terms of the capabilities required by the organization, the ways to access them in the market, and their development, maintenance, and retention. It is also distinct from “HR Strategy”, which focuses on de fi ning how to organize and operate the HR function, as well as determining what processes, policies, and services will be part of it at any given stage.
  • 4.
    Talent management strategyis useful for prioritizing time and investment decisions on the most important initiatives for the organization, not only the most urgent. It is an overarching plan that encompasses all talent management areas, helping align the HR agenda with the business strategy. It allows HR teams and key stakeholders across the business to collaborate and agree on main objectives and a roadmap of improvement initiatives. The scope typically comprises programs supporting the worker life cycle, which involves attracting, accessing, engaging, managing, augmenting, developing, and transitioning talent. Nevertheless, the process creates the opportunity to holistically review other areas driven by HR to evaluate and improve. Whyuseit 4
  • 5.
    Assessing talent management needsand aspirations to establishbestpracticestotarget. PRACTICE GUIDE L1 Progression
  • 6.
    Implementing a newor improving an existing HR program, which has been preselected as a prioritized focus area, requires identifying or de fi ning the right types of practices that will help achieve the desired outcomes for the program. Wowledge packages the practices necessary to implement new programs from scratch or advance them from an existing stage across different levels of sophistication, helping fast-track this process. This is illustrated in the applicable practices for key HR programs included in Wowledge’s catalog. Alternatively, a systematic approach can be put in place when other or highly customized practices need to be considered as follows. Howitworks 6 Revisiting data from prior analysis of the business strategy will be fundamental. This might include KPIs, and organizational needs, with particular attention to employee surveys and comments, feedback, and anecdotal information from interactions with top leadership, managers, and internal customers throughout the year. This information aids in creating a preliminary list of potential practices or improvement initiatives per focus area. This list might contain a mix of practices with some included in Wowledge’s progressions and others newly identi fi ed through this approach. Research is necessary to complement the preliminary list, ideally with recognized best practices to implement the corresponding HR program. Research methods include asking consultants or specialists, reviewing expert articles or books, and exploring credible online sources. Review quantitative and qualitative data inputs
  • 7.
    Fine-tuning a morerobust and speci fi c list of improvement initiatives results from targeted conversations with key company stakeholders. The best way to obtain valuable and structured feedback during these interactions is guiding the conversation with standardized questions or a questionnaire covering the following elements for each targeted talent management program in scope: a. Full description of the program and what the expected outcome(s) are for the organization. This serves to open the discussion to align understanding and uncover if stakeholders have different expectations that should be addressed. b. Preliminary list of practices or improvement initiatives to implement for the program. The intent is asking probing questions to help validate or expand the list, together with assessing which speci fi c initiatives might be the most relevant. 7 c. Questions to gather views on program interdependencies or particular challenges with respect to making the desired improvements. This will help understand linkages among programs and other key considerations. d. Stakeholders who should be involved in the design or implementation of each speci fi c program or initiative. Discussing potential participants helps make sure the entire process will have the buy-in from the key people in the organization and, in some cases, identi fi es supporting resources. This exercise yields both quantitative and qualitative data to not only create a fuller list of improvement initiatives but to also get a sense for which of those practices might be the most relevant to set adequate and achievable aspirations for the improvement cycle.
  • 8.
    8 Compiling a completelist of practices for each HR program takes collaboration and diverse sources. As such, each practice has different levels of complexity to execute. In addition, some initiatives might already be in place in part or would be set aside to consider at a later stage. It is best to organize and classify the practices into levels of sophistication to make it easier to de fi ne appropriate aspirations to start working towards and track how the organization might be progressing towards implementing more robust practices over time. An effective framework to use is classifying practices into three levels of progression, the way Wowledge structures its expert-developed practices, considering the following criteria: -Level 1 Practices: The core, or most fundamental practices that are considered the building blocks. These will be less complex and without signi fi cant investments or skillsets to implement. -Level 2 Practices: The advanced, or more mature practices considered the next level of sophistication. These might require using technologies and already basic practices in place. -Level 3 Practices: The emerging or leading practices that might involve the latest HR thinking. These highly sophisticated practices might require leveraging more complex technologies, models, or skillsets. De fi ne current state and desired practices
  • 9.
    9 After classifying practicesinto their corresponding levels, it will be relevant to identify if any are already in place to some degree in the organization. At this stage, the objective is to determine what practices to consider targeting for the improvement cycle as an aspiration. The “Targeting Aspiring Practices Template” helps organize practices and complete such assessment. Typically, all HR functional leaders (e.g., recruitment, learning and development, compensation, and HR operations) take part in the process to assess the state of each program and practices, de fi ne aspirations, and identify gaps. Feedback from stakeholders and employees also serves as a key input to the diagnostic process.
  • 11.
    Wowledge is theexpert-driven platform for lean teams building modern HR programs. Members enjoy access to up-to-date best practices, step- by-step guides, tools, templates, and insights to accelerate the design and implementation of all key HR programs and processes. Since each organization has unique characteristics, needs, and aspirations, Wowledge's practices are developed utilizing an exclusive stage-based approach – from Core to Advanced to Emerging – that reflects distinct levels of sophistication to meet our members where they are. About Wowledge GET STARTED FOR FREE! Visit Wowledge.com to learn more and become a Guest for Free.
  • 12.
    Legal disclaimer This documentand any content included is provided to you on an as-is basis without any representations or warranties of any kind. No recipient of content from this document should act, refrain from acting or make any decisions on the basis of any content included. Wowledge or its licensors shall not be responsible or liable for the use, accuracy, or usefulness of any content transmitted or made available via this document, and shall not be responsible or liable for any action, refraining from action or decisions made based on such content. Wowledge does not warrant that any defects or errors will be corrected. Any content obtained in connection with this document is at your own risk and you will be solely responsible for any damage or any other liabilities or damages that result from such use. Wowledge takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for the content included in this document. You understand and agree that you may be exposed to content that is inaccurate, objectionable, inappropriate, unreliable, or otherwise unsuited to your purpose. All contents copyright © 2023 by Wowledge. All rights reserved.