SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
Education at a Glance
2014
Qualification levels in Europe
have risen markedly…
…but don’t always translate into strong foundation skills
2
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1995
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate (%)
Costperstudent
Graduate supply
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1995
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate (%)
Costperstudent
Graduate supply
United States
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2000
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
United Kingdom
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2001
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2002
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2003
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2004
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2005
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2006
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2007
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2008
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2009
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2010
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2011
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2011
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Iceland
Poland
UK
Australia
New Zealand
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2011
Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
US
P
Many more people are expected to graduate from
academically-oriented tertiary education
First-time graduation rates in tertiary-type A education (1995 and 2012)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Iceland
NewZealand
Poland
Australia
Denmark
Finland
Ireland
Netherlands
Japan
SlovakRepublic
Slovenia
Norway
Portugal
Latvia
Israel
CzechRepublic
Austria
Sweden
UnitedStates
EU21average
OECDaverage
Canada
Germany
Switzerland
Spain
Turkey
Italy
Chile
Hungary
Mexico
Tertiary-type A (2012) Tertiary-type A (1995)
%
Chart A3.2
- A
Nearly 60% of young adults are expected to enter
university programmes
Entry rates into tertiary-type A education (2012)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Australia
Latvia
Iceland
Poland
NewZealand
Norway
Slovenia
Denmark
UnitedStates
RussianFederation
Korea
UnitedKingdom
Finland
Netherlands
Portugal
SlovakRepublic
Sweden
Israel
CzechRepublic
Argentina
SaudiArabia
OECDaverage
EU21average
Ireland
Hungary
Germany
Austria
Spain
Japan
Chile
Italy
Switzerland
Estonia
France
Turkey
Greece
Mexico
Belgium
Luxembourg
Indonesia
China
All students Excluding international students
Chart C3.1
%
Women and men are differently represented
in some fields of education
Percentage of tertiary degrees awarded to women, by field of education (2012)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Poland
Estonia
Iceland
SlovakRepublic
Slovenia
Brazil
Sweden
Hungary
Italy
NewZealand
Argentina
CzechRepublic
Finland
Norway
Luxembourg
Portugal
Canada
Denmark
Israel
OECDaverage
UnitedStates
Australia
Spain
Ireland
Netherlands
Chile
France
UnitedKingdom
Austria
Belgium
Germany
Mexico
Switzerland
Turkey
Korea
Japan
Education Health and welfare Science Engineering, manufacturing and construction All fields
Chart A.3 -
Field
Women are more likely than men to earn a university
degree, but less likely a doctorate
Percentage of graduas teawarded to women by level of educatio()
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Latvia
Greece
Iceland
Sweden
Slovenia
Estonia
SlovakRepublic
Poland
Luxembourg
CzechRepublic
Finland
Norway
Brazil
Brazil
NewZealand
Argentina
Denmark
Canada
Hungary
Australia
OECDaverage
Portugal
Austria
Spain
Israel
UnitedStates
UnitedKingdom
Ireland
Netherlands
Chile
France
Belgium
Switzerland
Mexico
Germany
Korea
Turkey
Advanced research qualifications Tertiary-type A first degree
Chart A3_G
ender
China has almost caught up with the US in terms of
high-school completion
Upper secondary graduation rates (2012)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Slovenia
Iceland
Germany
Netherlands
Hungary
UnitedKingdom
Ireland
Japan
Spain
Finland
Denmark
Korea
Norway
Canada
Israel
SlovakRepublic
EU21average
NewZealand
Poland
Chile
Italy
OECDaverage
CzechRepublic
UnitedStates
Sweden
China
Greece
Luxembourg
Austria
Turkey
Mexico
Total <25 years old ≧25 years old
Chart A2.1
%
In many countries those without an upper secondary
education face an increasing unemployment risk
Unemployment rates among 25-64 year-olds, by educational attainment (2005, 2010 and 2012)
0
10
20
30
40
50
Korea
Mexico
Brazil
Norway
Chile
Australia
Luxembourg
NewZealand
Netherlands
Iceland
Austria
Switzerland
Turkey
Denmark
Israel
UnitedKingdom
Canada
Finland
Belgium
RussianFederation
Italy
Sweden
Germany
OECDaverage
France
Slovenia
UnitedStates
Portugal
EU21average
Poland
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Ireland
Greece
CzechRepublic
Spain
SlovakRepublic
2012 2005 2010
Below upper secondary education
Chart A5.2
- BS
%
Qualification don’t always translate into
strong foundation skills
26
Literacy proficiency is determined by educational attainment
but not in the same way across countries
Mean literacy score, by educational attainment (2012)
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
Japan
Netherlands
Finland
Sweden
Australia
CzechRepublic
Flanders(Belgium)
Norway
UnitedStates
Average
Poland
Austria
England/N.Ireland(UK)
SlovakRepublic
France
Germany
Denmark
Ireland
Korea
Canada
Estonia
Spain
Italy
RussianFederation
Below upper secondary education
Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education
Tertiary education
Chart A1.4
The shares of highly literate tertiary graduates are
very different across countries
Percentage of adults scoring at literacy proficiency Level 4/5, by educational attainment (2012)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Japan
Finland
Netherlands
Sweden
Australia
Norway
Flanders(Belgium)
England/N.Ireland(UK)
UnitedStates
CzechRepublic
Average
Poland
Canada
Austria
Germany
Ireland
France
Denmark
Estonia
SlovakRepublic
Korea
RussianFederation
Spain
Italy
Below upper secondary education
Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education
Tertiary education
%
Chart A1.5
The rising tide has not lifted all boats…
…and in some countries educational mobility is slowing down
33
Between 20% and 60% of adults are more educated
than their parents
Percentage of 25-64 year-old non-students whose educational attainment is higher than (upward mobility) or lower than (downward mobility)
that of their parents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Czech
Republic
Germany
Austria
UnitedStates
Slovak
Republic
Italy
Norway
Denmark
England/N.
Ireland(UK)
Spain
Average
Australia
Japan
Sweden
Estonia
Canada
Netherlands
Poland
Ireland
France
Flanders
(Belgium)
Finland
Korea
Russian
Federation
Downward mobility Upward mobility
%
Chart A4.3
- Mob
In most countries, upward educational mobility tends to
be lower in the younger generations
Proportion of upward mobility across age groups
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34
UpwardMobility
Age groups
Average France Germany Italy Spain Sweden United States England/N. Ireland (UK)
Graph
Mobility A4
Across OECD countries, about one in two 15-19
year-olds not in education is not working
Percentage of 15-19 year-olds not in education, by labour market status (2012)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Mexico
Turkey
Japan
Brazil
Israel
Chile
NewZealand
Australia
Canada
UnitedKingdom
Norway
Italy
Iceland
UnitedStates
OECDaverage
Spain
Ireland
Austria
Portugal
Switzerland
Belgium
Korea
Estonia
Denmark
Sweden
EU21average
France
Finland
SlovakRepublic
Netherlands
CzechRepublic
Greece
Hungary
Germany
Poland
Slovenia
Luxembourg
NEET, unemployed NEET, inactive Not in education, employed
Chart C5.3
%
Europe is now driving
international student mobility…
…the US accommodates a large but declining share of the market.
43
In 2012, more than 4.5 million students were enrolled in
tertiary education outside their country of citizenship Chart C4.1
Evolution in the number of students enrolled outside their country of citizenship, by region of destination (2000 to 2012)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Worldwide OECD G20 countries
Europe North America Oceania
Million students
25% of EU target
In 2012, more than one in two foreign students were enrolled in Australia,
Canada, France, Germany, the United Kingdom or the United States
Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education, by country of destination (2012)
United States¹ 16%
United Kingdom¹ 13%
Germany 6%
France 6%Australia¹,³ 6%
Canada² 5%
Russian Federation 4%
Japan 3%
Spain 2%
China 2%
Italy 2%
Austria 2%
New Zealand 2%
South Africa 2%
Switzerland 1%
Netherlands 1%
Korea 1%
Belgium 1%
Other OECD countries
8%
Other non-OECD
countries 17%
Chart C4.2
New players are emerging in the international
education market
Trends in international education market shares (2000, 2012). Percentage of all foreign tertiary students enrolled, by destination
0
5
10
15
20
25
UnitedState
UnitedKingdom
Germany
France
Australia
Canada
RussianFederation
Japan
Spain
China
Italy
Austria
NewZealand
SouthAfrica
Switzerland
Netherlands
Korea
Belgium
OtherOECD
OtherG0andnon-OECD
2000
2012
Market share (%)
OECD countries Other G20 and
non-OECD countries
2000
2012
Chart C4.3
International students comprise around 8% of
tertiary enrolments, on average
Student mobility in tertiary education (2012)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Luxembourg
Australia
UnitedKingdom
Switzerland
NewZealand
Austria
Belgium
Canada¹
Denmark
Netherlands
Sweden
Ireland
Iceland
Finland
Portugal
Hungary
SlovakRepublic
UnitedStates
Japan
Spain
Estonia
Slovenia
Norway
Poland
Chile
France
CzechRepublic
SouthAfrica¹
Greece
Italy
SaudiArabia
RussianFederation
Korea
Israel
Turkey
China
Brazil
Foreign students2
%
International students
OECD average
Chart C4.4
More than half of foreign students in tertiary
education come from Asia
Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education, by region of origin (2012)
Asia 53%
Europe 23%
Africa 12%
Latin America and the
Caribbean 6%
North America 3%
Oceania 1%
Not specified 3%
Chart C4.5
Education remained a priority during the crisis…
49
Between 2008 and 2011, only six countries cut
public expenditure on educational institutions
Impact of the economic crisis on public expenditure on education
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
UnitedKingdom
CzechRepublic
NewZealand
Denmark
SlovakRepublic
Brazil
Finland
Australia
Ireland
Netherlands
Japan
Switzerland
Germany
Slovenia
Chile
Canada
Portugal
Mexico
Korea
OECDaverage
Austria
Spain
EU21average
Norway
Belgium
France
Sweden
Israel
Iceland
UnitedStates
ssianFederation
Poland
Estonia
Italy
Hungary
Index of change (2008=100)
Change in public expenditure on educational institutions
Change in Gross Domestic Product
Change in expenditure on education institutions as a percentage of GDP
Chart B2.3
- T
Expenditure per primary, secondary and post-secondary non-
tertiary student increased by at least 10% in most countries
Relationship between annual expenditure per student in 2011 and change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011
BrazilMexico
ChileHungary
Slovak Republic
Estonia
PolandCzech RepublicIsraelPortugal
Korea
Italy Spain
Iceland Japan Finland
France AustraliaGermanyUnited Kingdom IrelandCanadaDenmark Netherlands
Sweden Belgium
United States
Austria
Switzerland
Norway
New Zealand
R² = 0.2707
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
8 000
9 000
10 000
11 000
12 000
13 000
14 000
15 000
16 000
17 000
18 000
19 000
20 000
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Annual expenditure per
student (2011, USD)
Change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 (%)
OECD average
Primary, secondary, and post-secondary non-tertiary
OECD average
Chart B1.5
- PS
Between 2005 and 2011, expenditure per tertiary
student increased by 10%, on average
Relationship between annual expenditure per student in 2011 and change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011
United States
Switzerland
Denmark
Sweden
Norway Finland
Netherlands Germany
Japan
Ireland
Belgium
FranceAustria
Spain
Israel
United Kingdom
Brazil
Italy
KoreaPolandPortugal
Czech Republic
HungaryChile
Slovak RepublicMexico Estonia
Iceland
Russian Federation
New Zealand
Slovenia
R² = 0.079
5 000
6 000
7 000
8 000
9 000
10 000
11 000
12 000
13 000
14 000
15 000
16 000
17 000
18 000
19 000
20 000
21 000
22 000
23 000
24 000
25 000
26 000
27 000
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Annual expenditure per
student (2011, USD)
Change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 (%)
OECD average
Tertiary education
OECD average
Chart B1.5
- T
In 2011, OECD countries spent an average of 1.6% of
their GDP on tertiary education
Expenditure on educational institutions as a percentage of GDP (2011). From public and private sources, by level of education and
source of funds
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Finland
Denmark
Norway
Canada
Sweden
Estonia
Austria
Switzerland
Belgium
Netherlands
France
EU21average
Argentina
Ireland
CzechRepublic
Slovenia
Germany
Iceland
Spain
Poland
NewZealand
Latvia
Portugal
Hungary
UnitedStates
Brazil
Israel
Mexico
UnitedKingdom
RussianFederation
Colombia
SlovakRepublic
Chile
Italy
Korea
Australia
Japan
% of GDP
Tertiary education
Public expenditure on education institutions Private expenditure on education institutions
OECD average (total expenditure)
Chart B2.2
- T
Few European countries have sustainable financing
for tertiary education
60
The share of private expenditure on tertiary institutions
increased from 25% in 2000 to 31% in 2011
Share of private expenditure on tertiary educational institutions (2000, 2008 and 2011)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Chile
Korea
UnitedKingdom
Japan
UnitedStates
Australia
Israel
Canada
RussianFederation
Italy
Mexico
Portugal
OECDaverage
Netherlands
Poland
SlovakRepublic
Spain
EU21average
Estonia
Ireland
France
CzechRepublic
Germany
Slovenia
Austria
Sweden
Belgium
Iceland
Denmark
Finland
Norway
%
2011 2008 2000
Chart B3.3
- T
Nearly 22% of public spending on tertiary education is devoted to
supporting students, households and other private entities
Public support for tertiary education (2011)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
UnitedKingdom
UnitedStates
Slovenia
Denmark
Italy
Chile
SlovakRepublic
Austria
Germany
Portugal
NewZealand
Belgium
Latvia
Finland
Australia
OECDaverage
Netherlands
Ireland
Hungary
Poland
Norway
Israel
Sweden
Spain
France
Switzerland
Canada
Mexico
Brazil
Turkey
Korea
Estonia
Indonesia
CzechRepublic
Argentina
Japan
Iceland
% of total public expenditure
on tertiary education
Student loans
Transfers and payments to other private entities
Scholarships/ other grants to households
Chart B5.3. Public subsidies for education in tertiary
Chart B5.3
The net public return on investment for a man in tertiary education is over
USD 100 000, while the net private return is over USD 180 000
Net private and public returns associated with a man attaining tertiary education (2010)
0
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
350 000
400 000
450 000
500 000
Turkey
Denmark
Spain
Estonia
Sweden
NewZealand
Greece
Korea
Japan
Canada
SlovakRepublic
Poland
Norway
Israel
CzechRepublic
France
Australia
Finland
OECDaverage
Portugal
EU21average
Austria
UnitedKingdom
Netherlands
Italy
Belgium
Slovenia
Germany
UnitedStates
Hungary
Ireland
EquivalentUSD
Private net returns Public net returns
Chart A7.1
Good progress in raising early childhood participation
93
Several EU countries have surpassed 2020 targets
Some 70% of 3-year-olds are enrolled in early
childhood education
Enrolment rates at age 3 in early childhood education (2005 and 2012)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Belgium
France
Denmark
Iceland
Spain
Norway
UnitedKingdom
Sweden
Italy
Germany
Estonia
NewZealand
Israel
Korea
Slovenia
Netherlands
Latvia
EU21average
Portugal
Japan
Hungary
Luxembourg
OECDaverage
RussianFederation
Austria
SlovakRepublic
CzechRepublic
Poland
Finland
Chile
Ireland
Mexico
UnitedStates
Argentina
Brazil
Australia
Colombia
Indonesia
Turkey
Switzerland
2012 2005%
Chart C2.1
The ratio of pupils to teaching staff also indicates the level
of resources devoted to pre-primary education
Ratio of pupils to teaching staff in early childhood education (2012). Public and private institutions, calculation
based on full-time equivalents
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
Israel
Indonesia
Mexico
Chile
France
Turkey
UnitedKingdom
Brazil
Poland
Belgium
Portugal
Korea
Netherlands
Japan
OECDaverage
Austria
CzechRepublic
EU21average
Spain
SlovakRepublic
Germany
UnitedStates
Italy
Luxembourg
Hungary
Finland
Slovenia
Estonia
NewZealand
Sweden
Iceland
Student to teaching staff ratio
Chart C2.4
Countries spend their money differently on schools…
…and many high-performing school systems prioritise the quality of
teachers over the size of classes.
96
The salary cost of teachers per student varies widely across
countries and depends on salary, class size, and teaching time
Contribution of various factors to salary cost of teachers per student, in upper secondary education (2012) in USD
-3 800
-2 800
-1 800
- 800
200
1 200
2 200
3 200
Belgium(Fl.)
Germany
Austria
Spain
Portugal
Australia
Norway
Canada
France
Ireland
Netherlands
UnitedStates
Korea
Italy
Finland
England
Slovenia
Israel
Poland
CzechRepublic
Turkey
Hungary
Chile
SlovakRepublic
Estonia
USD
Contribution of teachers' salary Contribution of instruction time
Contribution of teaching time Contribution of estimated class size
difference with OECD average
Chart B7.4
Students in OECD countries receive an average of 7 475 compulsory hours
of instruction during their primary and lower secondary education
Compulsory instruction time in general education (2014)
0 2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 12 000
Australia 10
Colombia1 9
Spain 10
United States 9
Israel 9
Netherlands7 9
Chile 8
Mexico 9
Ireland 9
France 9
Canada 9
Luxembourg 9
Denmark 10
England 9
Norway 10
Iceland 10
Portugal 9
OECD average 9
Italy 8
Japan 9
EU21 average 9
Germany 9
Greece 9
Belgium (Fr.) 8
Czech Republic 9
Slovak Republic 9
Sweden 9
Belgium (Fl.) 8
Estonia 9
Austria 8
Korea 9
Finland 9
Slovenia 9
Turkey 8
Poland 9
China1 9
Latvia 9
Hungary 8
Primary education Lower secondary educationDuration of primary and lower
secondary education, in years
Chart D1.1
Total number of compulsory instruction hours
Only in 7 countries were relative salaries for teachers
higher than those of comparably educated workers
Teachers' salaries relative to earnings for tertiary-educated workers aged 25-64 (2012 or latest available year). Lower secondary teachers'
salaries, in public institutions
0
0.5
1
1.5
Korea
Spain
Luxembourg
Portugal
Turkey
NewZealand
Canada
Finland
Germany
England
Australia
Greece
Denmark
OECDaverage
Belgium(Fl.)
France
EU21average
Israel
Estonia
Poland
Scotland
Sweden
Belgium(Fr.)
Netherlands
Ireland
Slovenia
Chile
Norway
UnitedStates
Italy
Austria
CzechRepublic
Hungary
SlovakRepublic
Ratio
Chart D3.1
Between 2009 and 2012, teachers’ salaries fell, for the first
time since 2000, by around 5% at all levels of education
OECD average, for countries with available data for all reference years, of the index of change between 2005 and 2012 (2005 = 100, constant p
rices), for teachers with 15 years of experience and minimum training.
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Primary education Lower secondary education Upper secondary education
Chart Box
D.3.2
Equivalent USD converted
using PPPs
107
107 Thank you
Find out more about our work at
www.oecd.org/eag/eag2014
– The publication
– The methodologies
– The complete database
Email: Andreas.Schleicher@OECD.org
Twitter: SchleicherEDU
and remember:
Without data, you are just another person with an opinion

More Related Content

Similar to Education at a glance 2014 - OECD

Education at a Glance 2014 - Key Findings
Education at a Glance 2014 - Key FindingsEducation at a Glance 2014 - Key Findings
Education at a Glance 2014 - Key Findings
EduSkills OECD
 
Education at a Glance 2014 - United States
Education at a Glance 2014 - United StatesEducation at a Glance 2014 - United States
Education at a Glance 2014 - United States
EduSkills OECD
 
Education at a Glance 2017 – London, September 12 2017
Education at a Glance 2017 –  London, September 12 2017Education at a Glance 2017 –  London, September 12 2017
Education at a Glance 2017 – London, September 12 2017
EduSkills OECD
 
Global trends in higher education
Global trends in higher educationGlobal trends in higher education
Global trends in higher educationOECD
 
Schule 2.0
Schule 2.0Schule 2.0
Schule 2.0OECD
 
Education at a Glance 2017
Education at a Glance 2017Education at a Glance 2017
Education at a Glance 2017
EduSkills OECD
 
Raising Social Mobility Through Teacher Policy
Raising Social Mobility Through Teacher PolicyRaising Social Mobility Through Teacher Policy
Raising Social Mobility Through Teacher Policy
EduSkills OECD
 
Education at a Glance 2016
Education at a Glance 2016Education at a Glance 2016
Education at a Glance 2016
EduSkills OECD
 
Strengths and weaknesses of national systems of human capital development in ...
Strengths and weaknesses of national systems of human capital development in ...Strengths and weaknesses of national systems of human capital development in ...
Strengths and weaknesses of national systems of human capital development in ...
dvndamme
 
Education at a Glance 2014 - United Kingdom
Education at a Glance 2014  - United KingdomEducation at a Glance 2014  - United Kingdom
Education at a Glance 2014 - United Kingdom
EduSkills OECD
 
EDPC Ministerial -Equity.pptx
EDPC Ministerial -Equity.pptxEDPC Ministerial -Equity.pptx
EDPC Ministerial -Equity.pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
Breakout session- Schleicher.pptx
Breakout session- Schleicher.pptxBreakout session- Schleicher.pptx
Breakout session- Schleicher.pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
The state of education around the world: Findings from Education at a Glance ...
The state of education around the world: Findings from Education at a Glance ...The state of education around the world: Findings from Education at a Glance ...
The state of education around the world: Findings from Education at a Glance ...
EduSkills OECD
 
Education at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators - Key findings
Education at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators - Key findingsEducation at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators - Key findings
Education at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators - Key findingsEduSkills OECD
 
Education at a Glance 2020 - United Kingdom launch
Education at a Glance 2020 - United Kingdom launchEducation at a Glance 2020 - United Kingdom launch
Education at a Glance 2020 - United Kingdom launch
EduSkills OECD
 
PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Poli...
PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Poli...PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Poli...
PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Poli...
EduSkills OECD
 
Improving equity in Sweden
Improving equity in SwedenImproving equity in Sweden
Improving equity in Sweden
EduSkills OECD
 
Icelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurship
Icelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurshipIcelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurship
Icelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurship
Hjalmar Gislason
 
Education World Forum – Launch of the Education Policy Outlook and Education ...
Education World Forum – Launch of the Education Policy Outlook and Education ...Education World Forum – Launch of the Education Policy Outlook and Education ...
Education World Forum – Launch of the Education Policy Outlook and Education ...
EduSkills OECD
 
Dream jobs? - Teenagers' career aspirations and the future of work
Dream jobs? -  Teenagers' career aspirations and the future of workDream jobs? -  Teenagers' career aspirations and the future of work
Dream jobs? - Teenagers' career aspirations and the future of work
EduSkills OECD
 

Similar to Education at a glance 2014 - OECD (20)

Education at a Glance 2014 - Key Findings
Education at a Glance 2014 - Key FindingsEducation at a Glance 2014 - Key Findings
Education at a Glance 2014 - Key Findings
 
Education at a Glance 2014 - United States
Education at a Glance 2014 - United StatesEducation at a Glance 2014 - United States
Education at a Glance 2014 - United States
 
Education at a Glance 2017 – London, September 12 2017
Education at a Glance 2017 –  London, September 12 2017Education at a Glance 2017 –  London, September 12 2017
Education at a Glance 2017 – London, September 12 2017
 
Global trends in higher education
Global trends in higher educationGlobal trends in higher education
Global trends in higher education
 
Schule 2.0
Schule 2.0Schule 2.0
Schule 2.0
 
Education at a Glance 2017
Education at a Glance 2017Education at a Glance 2017
Education at a Glance 2017
 
Raising Social Mobility Through Teacher Policy
Raising Social Mobility Through Teacher PolicyRaising Social Mobility Through Teacher Policy
Raising Social Mobility Through Teacher Policy
 
Education at a Glance 2016
Education at a Glance 2016Education at a Glance 2016
Education at a Glance 2016
 
Strengths and weaknesses of national systems of human capital development in ...
Strengths and weaknesses of national systems of human capital development in ...Strengths and weaknesses of national systems of human capital development in ...
Strengths and weaknesses of national systems of human capital development in ...
 
Education at a Glance 2014 - United Kingdom
Education at a Glance 2014  - United KingdomEducation at a Glance 2014  - United Kingdom
Education at a Glance 2014 - United Kingdom
 
EDPC Ministerial -Equity.pptx
EDPC Ministerial -Equity.pptxEDPC Ministerial -Equity.pptx
EDPC Ministerial -Equity.pptx
 
Breakout session- Schleicher.pptx
Breakout session- Schleicher.pptxBreakout session- Schleicher.pptx
Breakout session- Schleicher.pptx
 
The state of education around the world: Findings from Education at a Glance ...
The state of education around the world: Findings from Education at a Glance ...The state of education around the world: Findings from Education at a Glance ...
The state of education around the world: Findings from Education at a Glance ...
 
Education at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators - Key findings
Education at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators - Key findingsEducation at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators - Key findings
Education at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators - Key findings
 
Education at a Glance 2020 - United Kingdom launch
Education at a Glance 2020 - United Kingdom launchEducation at a Glance 2020 - United Kingdom launch
Education at a Glance 2020 - United Kingdom launch
 
PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Poli...
PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Poli...PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Poli...
PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Poli...
 
Improving equity in Sweden
Improving equity in SwedenImproving equity in Sweden
Improving equity in Sweden
 
Icelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurship
Icelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurshipIcelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurship
Icelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurship
 
Education World Forum – Launch of the Education Policy Outlook and Education ...
Education World Forum – Launch of the Education Policy Outlook and Education ...Education World Forum – Launch of the Education Policy Outlook and Education ...
Education World Forum – Launch of the Education Policy Outlook and Education ...
 
Dream jobs? - Teenagers' career aspirations and the future of work
Dream jobs? -  Teenagers' career aspirations and the future of workDream jobs? -  Teenagers' career aspirations and the future of work
Dream jobs? - Teenagers' career aspirations and the future of work
 

Recently uploaded

Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
camakaiclarkmusic
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya
 
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
timhan337
 
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxPalestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
RaedMohamed3
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
CarlosHernanMontoyab2
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
TechSoup
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
Jisc
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Po-Chuan Chen
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
SACHIN R KONDAGURI
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Celine George
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
 
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxPalestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
 

Education at a glance 2014 - OECD

  • 1. 1 Education at a Glance 2014
  • 2. Qualification levels in Europe have risen markedly… …but don’t always translate into strong foundation skills 2
  • 3. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1995 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate (%) Costperstudent Graduate supply
  • 4. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1995 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate (%) Costperstudent Graduate supply United States
  • 5. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2000 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate United Kingdom
  • 6. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2001 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 7. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2002 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 8. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2003 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 9. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2004 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 10. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2005 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 11. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2006 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 12. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2007 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 13. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2008 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 14. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2009 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 15. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2010 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 16. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2011 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate
  • 17. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2011 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate Iceland Poland UK Australia New Zealand
  • 18. Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States A world of change – higher education 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2011 Expenditureperstudentattertiarylevel(USD) Tertiary-type A graduation rate US P
  • 19. Many more people are expected to graduate from academically-oriented tertiary education First-time graduation rates in tertiary-type A education (1995 and 2012) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Iceland NewZealand Poland Australia Denmark Finland Ireland Netherlands Japan SlovakRepublic Slovenia Norway Portugal Latvia Israel CzechRepublic Austria Sweden UnitedStates EU21average OECDaverage Canada Germany Switzerland Spain Turkey Italy Chile Hungary Mexico Tertiary-type A (2012) Tertiary-type A (1995) % Chart A3.2 - A
  • 20. Nearly 60% of young adults are expected to enter university programmes Entry rates into tertiary-type A education (2012) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Australia Latvia Iceland Poland NewZealand Norway Slovenia Denmark UnitedStates RussianFederation Korea UnitedKingdom Finland Netherlands Portugal SlovakRepublic Sweden Israel CzechRepublic Argentina SaudiArabia OECDaverage EU21average Ireland Hungary Germany Austria Spain Japan Chile Italy Switzerland Estonia France Turkey Greece Mexico Belgium Luxembourg Indonesia China All students Excluding international students Chart C3.1 %
  • 21. Women and men are differently represented in some fields of education Percentage of tertiary degrees awarded to women, by field of education (2012) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Poland Estonia Iceland SlovakRepublic Slovenia Brazil Sweden Hungary Italy NewZealand Argentina CzechRepublic Finland Norway Luxembourg Portugal Canada Denmark Israel OECDaverage UnitedStates Australia Spain Ireland Netherlands Chile France UnitedKingdom Austria Belgium Germany Mexico Switzerland Turkey Korea Japan Education Health and welfare Science Engineering, manufacturing and construction All fields Chart A.3 - Field
  • 22. Women are more likely than men to earn a university degree, but less likely a doctorate Percentage of graduas teawarded to women by level of educatio() 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Latvia Greece Iceland Sweden Slovenia Estonia SlovakRepublic Poland Luxembourg CzechRepublic Finland Norway Brazil Brazil NewZealand Argentina Denmark Canada Hungary Australia OECDaverage Portugal Austria Spain Israel UnitedStates UnitedKingdom Ireland Netherlands Chile France Belgium Switzerland Mexico Germany Korea Turkey Advanced research qualifications Tertiary-type A first degree Chart A3_G ender
  • 23. China has almost caught up with the US in terms of high-school completion Upper secondary graduation rates (2012) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Slovenia Iceland Germany Netherlands Hungary UnitedKingdom Ireland Japan Spain Finland Denmark Korea Norway Canada Israel SlovakRepublic EU21average NewZealand Poland Chile Italy OECDaverage CzechRepublic UnitedStates Sweden China Greece Luxembourg Austria Turkey Mexico Total <25 years old ≧25 years old Chart A2.1 %
  • 24. In many countries those without an upper secondary education face an increasing unemployment risk Unemployment rates among 25-64 year-olds, by educational attainment (2005, 2010 and 2012) 0 10 20 30 40 50 Korea Mexico Brazil Norway Chile Australia Luxembourg NewZealand Netherlands Iceland Austria Switzerland Turkey Denmark Israel UnitedKingdom Canada Finland Belgium RussianFederation Italy Sweden Germany OECDaverage France Slovenia UnitedStates Portugal EU21average Poland Estonia Hungary Latvia Ireland Greece CzechRepublic Spain SlovakRepublic 2012 2005 2010 Below upper secondary education Chart A5.2 - BS %
  • 25. Qualification don’t always translate into strong foundation skills 26
  • 26. Literacy proficiency is determined by educational attainment but not in the same way across countries Mean literacy score, by educational attainment (2012) 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 Japan Netherlands Finland Sweden Australia CzechRepublic Flanders(Belgium) Norway UnitedStates Average Poland Austria England/N.Ireland(UK) SlovakRepublic France Germany Denmark Ireland Korea Canada Estonia Spain Italy RussianFederation Below upper secondary education Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education Tertiary education Chart A1.4
  • 27. The shares of highly literate tertiary graduates are very different across countries Percentage of adults scoring at literacy proficiency Level 4/5, by educational attainment (2012) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Japan Finland Netherlands Sweden Australia Norway Flanders(Belgium) England/N.Ireland(UK) UnitedStates CzechRepublic Average Poland Canada Austria Germany Ireland France Denmark Estonia SlovakRepublic Korea RussianFederation Spain Italy Below upper secondary education Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education Tertiary education % Chart A1.5
  • 28. The rising tide has not lifted all boats… …and in some countries educational mobility is slowing down 33
  • 29. Between 20% and 60% of adults are more educated than their parents Percentage of 25-64 year-old non-students whose educational attainment is higher than (upward mobility) or lower than (downward mobility) that of their parents 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Czech Republic Germany Austria UnitedStates Slovak Republic Italy Norway Denmark England/N. Ireland(UK) Spain Average Australia Japan Sweden Estonia Canada Netherlands Poland Ireland France Flanders (Belgium) Finland Korea Russian Federation Downward mobility Upward mobility % Chart A4.3 - Mob
  • 30. In most countries, upward educational mobility tends to be lower in the younger generations Proportion of upward mobility across age groups 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 UpwardMobility Age groups Average France Germany Italy Spain Sweden United States England/N. Ireland (UK) Graph Mobility A4
  • 31. Across OECD countries, about one in two 15-19 year-olds not in education is not working Percentage of 15-19 year-olds not in education, by labour market status (2012) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Mexico Turkey Japan Brazil Israel Chile NewZealand Australia Canada UnitedKingdom Norway Italy Iceland UnitedStates OECDaverage Spain Ireland Austria Portugal Switzerland Belgium Korea Estonia Denmark Sweden EU21average France Finland SlovakRepublic Netherlands CzechRepublic Greece Hungary Germany Poland Slovenia Luxembourg NEET, unemployed NEET, inactive Not in education, employed Chart C5.3 %
  • 32. Europe is now driving international student mobility… …the US accommodates a large but declining share of the market. 43
  • 33. In 2012, more than 4.5 million students were enrolled in tertiary education outside their country of citizenship Chart C4.1 Evolution in the number of students enrolled outside their country of citizenship, by region of destination (2000 to 2012) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Worldwide OECD G20 countries Europe North America Oceania Million students 25% of EU target
  • 34. In 2012, more than one in two foreign students were enrolled in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the United Kingdom or the United States Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education, by country of destination (2012) United States¹ 16% United Kingdom¹ 13% Germany 6% France 6%Australia¹,³ 6% Canada² 5% Russian Federation 4% Japan 3% Spain 2% China 2% Italy 2% Austria 2% New Zealand 2% South Africa 2% Switzerland 1% Netherlands 1% Korea 1% Belgium 1% Other OECD countries 8% Other non-OECD countries 17% Chart C4.2
  • 35. New players are emerging in the international education market Trends in international education market shares (2000, 2012). Percentage of all foreign tertiary students enrolled, by destination 0 5 10 15 20 25 UnitedState UnitedKingdom Germany France Australia Canada RussianFederation Japan Spain China Italy Austria NewZealand SouthAfrica Switzerland Netherlands Korea Belgium OtherOECD OtherG0andnon-OECD 2000 2012 Market share (%) OECD countries Other G20 and non-OECD countries 2000 2012 Chart C4.3
  • 36. International students comprise around 8% of tertiary enrolments, on average Student mobility in tertiary education (2012) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Luxembourg Australia UnitedKingdom Switzerland NewZealand Austria Belgium Canada¹ Denmark Netherlands Sweden Ireland Iceland Finland Portugal Hungary SlovakRepublic UnitedStates Japan Spain Estonia Slovenia Norway Poland Chile France CzechRepublic SouthAfrica¹ Greece Italy SaudiArabia RussianFederation Korea Israel Turkey China Brazil Foreign students2 % International students OECD average Chart C4.4
  • 37. More than half of foreign students in tertiary education come from Asia Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education, by region of origin (2012) Asia 53% Europe 23% Africa 12% Latin America and the Caribbean 6% North America 3% Oceania 1% Not specified 3% Chart C4.5
  • 38. Education remained a priority during the crisis… 49
  • 39. Between 2008 and 2011, only six countries cut public expenditure on educational institutions Impact of the economic crisis on public expenditure on education 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 UnitedKingdom CzechRepublic NewZealand Denmark SlovakRepublic Brazil Finland Australia Ireland Netherlands Japan Switzerland Germany Slovenia Chile Canada Portugal Mexico Korea OECDaverage Austria Spain EU21average Norway Belgium France Sweden Israel Iceland UnitedStates ssianFederation Poland Estonia Italy Hungary Index of change (2008=100) Change in public expenditure on educational institutions Change in Gross Domestic Product Change in expenditure on education institutions as a percentage of GDP Chart B2.3 - T
  • 40. Expenditure per primary, secondary and post-secondary non- tertiary student increased by at least 10% in most countries Relationship between annual expenditure per student in 2011 and change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 BrazilMexico ChileHungary Slovak Republic Estonia PolandCzech RepublicIsraelPortugal Korea Italy Spain Iceland Japan Finland France AustraliaGermanyUnited Kingdom IrelandCanadaDenmark Netherlands Sweden Belgium United States Austria Switzerland Norway New Zealand R² = 0.2707 0 1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000 7 000 8 000 9 000 10 000 11 000 12 000 13 000 14 000 15 000 16 000 17 000 18 000 19 000 20 000 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Annual expenditure per student (2011, USD) Change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 (%) OECD average Primary, secondary, and post-secondary non-tertiary OECD average Chart B1.5 - PS
  • 41. Between 2005 and 2011, expenditure per tertiary student increased by 10%, on average Relationship between annual expenditure per student in 2011 and change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 United States Switzerland Denmark Sweden Norway Finland Netherlands Germany Japan Ireland Belgium FranceAustria Spain Israel United Kingdom Brazil Italy KoreaPolandPortugal Czech Republic HungaryChile Slovak RepublicMexico Estonia Iceland Russian Federation New Zealand Slovenia R² = 0.079 5 000 6 000 7 000 8 000 9 000 10 000 11 000 12 000 13 000 14 000 15 000 16 000 17 000 18 000 19 000 20 000 21 000 22 000 23 000 24 000 25 000 26 000 27 000 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Annual expenditure per student (2011, USD) Change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 (%) OECD average Tertiary education OECD average Chart B1.5 - T
  • 42. In 2011, OECD countries spent an average of 1.6% of their GDP on tertiary education Expenditure on educational institutions as a percentage of GDP (2011). From public and private sources, by level of education and source of funds 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Finland Denmark Norway Canada Sweden Estonia Austria Switzerland Belgium Netherlands France EU21average Argentina Ireland CzechRepublic Slovenia Germany Iceland Spain Poland NewZealand Latvia Portugal Hungary UnitedStates Brazil Israel Mexico UnitedKingdom RussianFederation Colombia SlovakRepublic Chile Italy Korea Australia Japan % of GDP Tertiary education Public expenditure on education institutions Private expenditure on education institutions OECD average (total expenditure) Chart B2.2 - T
  • 43. Few European countries have sustainable financing for tertiary education 60
  • 44. The share of private expenditure on tertiary institutions increased from 25% in 2000 to 31% in 2011 Share of private expenditure on tertiary educational institutions (2000, 2008 and 2011) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Chile Korea UnitedKingdom Japan UnitedStates Australia Israel Canada RussianFederation Italy Mexico Portugal OECDaverage Netherlands Poland SlovakRepublic Spain EU21average Estonia Ireland France CzechRepublic Germany Slovenia Austria Sweden Belgium Iceland Denmark Finland Norway % 2011 2008 2000 Chart B3.3 - T
  • 45. Nearly 22% of public spending on tertiary education is devoted to supporting students, households and other private entities Public support for tertiary education (2011) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 UnitedKingdom UnitedStates Slovenia Denmark Italy Chile SlovakRepublic Austria Germany Portugal NewZealand Belgium Latvia Finland Australia OECDaverage Netherlands Ireland Hungary Poland Norway Israel Sweden Spain France Switzerland Canada Mexico Brazil Turkey Korea Estonia Indonesia CzechRepublic Argentina Japan Iceland % of total public expenditure on tertiary education Student loans Transfers and payments to other private entities Scholarships/ other grants to households Chart B5.3. Public subsidies for education in tertiary Chart B5.3
  • 46. The net public return on investment for a man in tertiary education is over USD 100 000, while the net private return is over USD 180 000 Net private and public returns associated with a man attaining tertiary education (2010) 0 50 000 100 000 150 000 200 000 250 000 300 000 350 000 400 000 450 000 500 000 Turkey Denmark Spain Estonia Sweden NewZealand Greece Korea Japan Canada SlovakRepublic Poland Norway Israel CzechRepublic France Australia Finland OECDaverage Portugal EU21average Austria UnitedKingdom Netherlands Italy Belgium Slovenia Germany UnitedStates Hungary Ireland EquivalentUSD Private net returns Public net returns Chart A7.1
  • 47. Good progress in raising early childhood participation 93 Several EU countries have surpassed 2020 targets
  • 48. Some 70% of 3-year-olds are enrolled in early childhood education Enrolment rates at age 3 in early childhood education (2005 and 2012) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Belgium France Denmark Iceland Spain Norway UnitedKingdom Sweden Italy Germany Estonia NewZealand Israel Korea Slovenia Netherlands Latvia EU21average Portugal Japan Hungary Luxembourg OECDaverage RussianFederation Austria SlovakRepublic CzechRepublic Poland Finland Chile Ireland Mexico UnitedStates Argentina Brazil Australia Colombia Indonesia Turkey Switzerland 2012 2005% Chart C2.1
  • 49. The ratio of pupils to teaching staff also indicates the level of resources devoted to pre-primary education Ratio of pupils to teaching staff in early childhood education (2012). Public and private institutions, calculation based on full-time equivalents 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Israel Indonesia Mexico Chile France Turkey UnitedKingdom Brazil Poland Belgium Portugal Korea Netherlands Japan OECDaverage Austria CzechRepublic EU21average Spain SlovakRepublic Germany UnitedStates Italy Luxembourg Hungary Finland Slovenia Estonia NewZealand Sweden Iceland Student to teaching staff ratio Chart C2.4
  • 50. Countries spend their money differently on schools… …and many high-performing school systems prioritise the quality of teachers over the size of classes. 96
  • 51. The salary cost of teachers per student varies widely across countries and depends on salary, class size, and teaching time Contribution of various factors to salary cost of teachers per student, in upper secondary education (2012) in USD -3 800 -2 800 -1 800 - 800 200 1 200 2 200 3 200 Belgium(Fl.) Germany Austria Spain Portugal Australia Norway Canada France Ireland Netherlands UnitedStates Korea Italy Finland England Slovenia Israel Poland CzechRepublic Turkey Hungary Chile SlovakRepublic Estonia USD Contribution of teachers' salary Contribution of instruction time Contribution of teaching time Contribution of estimated class size difference with OECD average Chart B7.4
  • 52. Students in OECD countries receive an average of 7 475 compulsory hours of instruction during their primary and lower secondary education Compulsory instruction time in general education (2014) 0 2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 12 000 Australia 10 Colombia1 9 Spain 10 United States 9 Israel 9 Netherlands7 9 Chile 8 Mexico 9 Ireland 9 France 9 Canada 9 Luxembourg 9 Denmark 10 England 9 Norway 10 Iceland 10 Portugal 9 OECD average 9 Italy 8 Japan 9 EU21 average 9 Germany 9 Greece 9 Belgium (Fr.) 8 Czech Republic 9 Slovak Republic 9 Sweden 9 Belgium (Fl.) 8 Estonia 9 Austria 8 Korea 9 Finland 9 Slovenia 9 Turkey 8 Poland 9 China1 9 Latvia 9 Hungary 8 Primary education Lower secondary educationDuration of primary and lower secondary education, in years Chart D1.1 Total number of compulsory instruction hours
  • 53. Only in 7 countries were relative salaries for teachers higher than those of comparably educated workers Teachers' salaries relative to earnings for tertiary-educated workers aged 25-64 (2012 or latest available year). Lower secondary teachers' salaries, in public institutions 0 0.5 1 1.5 Korea Spain Luxembourg Portugal Turkey NewZealand Canada Finland Germany England Australia Greece Denmark OECDaverage Belgium(Fl.) France EU21average Israel Estonia Poland Scotland Sweden Belgium(Fr.) Netherlands Ireland Slovenia Chile Norway UnitedStates Italy Austria CzechRepublic Hungary SlovakRepublic Ratio Chart D3.1
  • 54. Between 2009 and 2012, teachers’ salaries fell, for the first time since 2000, by around 5% at all levels of education OECD average, for countries with available data for all reference years, of the index of change between 2005 and 2012 (2005 = 100, constant p rices), for teachers with 15 years of experience and minimum training. 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Primary education Lower secondary education Upper secondary education Chart Box D.3.2 Equivalent USD converted using PPPs
  • 55. 107 107 Thank you Find out more about our work at www.oecd.org/eag/eag2014 – The publication – The methodologies – The complete database Email: Andreas.Schleicher@OECD.org Twitter: SchleicherEDU and remember: Without data, you are just another person with an opinion