Duke Energy reported lower earnings in Q1 2004 compared to Q1 2003. Earnings per share were $0.36 compared to $0.25 the prior year. Ongoing earnings per share excluding special items were $0.32 compared to $0.42. Several business units experienced lower earnings including Franchised Electric, Natural Gas Transmission and Duke Energy North America which was impacted by mark-to-market losses. However, Field Services more than doubled its earnings and the company exceeded its asset sales target for the year.
Duke Energy reported strong financial results in the second quarter of 2004. Net income was $432 million, or $0.46 per share, matching the previous year's results. Excluding special items, ongoing earnings per share were $0.42 compared to $0.30 in 2003. Several of Duke Energy's business units performed well, including Duke Energy Field Services and Crescent Resources which both posted significant increases in earnings compared to the previous year. Duke Energy continued progress on meeting financial targets such as debt reduction and asset sales.
Duke Energy reported higher earnings per share in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the previous year. Earnings per share were $0.91 versus $0.34 in 2004, driven by gains from the sale of assets in the Field Services business and improved performance across most business units. Interest expense was lower due to debt reduction efforts. Duke Energy will hold an earnings call to discuss the results and outlook further.
Duke Energy reported second quarter 2005 earnings per share of $0.33, down from $0.46 in the second quarter of 2004. Mild weather led to lower sales for the Franchised Electric and DENA segments. Field Services and International posted strong results. Despite weather impacts, Duke Energy expects to meet its 2005 EPS target of $1.60 per share due to anticipated stronger performance in the second half of the year.
Duke Energy reported second quarter 2003 earnings per share of $0.46, including $0.16 from asset sales. Performance was impacted by cooler weather reducing electricity demand. Total first half 2003 earnings were $0.71 per share, including a $0.18 accounting change charge. Duke exceeded its $1.5 billion asset sale target and expects full-year earnings between $1.35-$1.60 per share.
Duke Energy reported higher third quarter 2004 earnings compared to third quarter 2003. Earnings per share increased to $0.41 per share from $0.05 per share in the prior year. Excluding special items, ongoing earnings per share were $0.38 compared to $0.35 in 2003. All business units are positioned to meet or exceed 2004 financial goals. Debt reduction for the year will exceed the $4 billion target, including $840 million retired through Australian asset sales.
- Duke Energy reported higher earnings per share in 2004 compared to a loss in 2003, exceeding its debt reduction and asset sale targets for the year.
- The Natural Gas Transmission and Field Services businesses produced record results in 2004.
- Duke Energy expects higher earnings in 2005 driven by increased earnings from Field Services, lower losses from Duke Energy North America, and lower interest expenses due to debt reduction.
This document is Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation's annual investors' report for 2005. Some key points:
- BNSF achieved record quarterly and annual revenue and earnings per share in 2005. Fourth quarter earnings were $1.13 per share, up 24% from 2004. Annual earnings were a record $4.01 per share.
- Freight revenues for the fourth quarter of 2005 increased 18% to $3.45 billion compared to 2004. For the full year, freight revenues increased 17% to $12.6 billion.
- Operating income for the fourth quarter was $800 million, up 20% from 2004. For 2005, operating income increased 73% to $2.92
DTE Energy reported 2004 earnings of $431 million, down from 2003 earnings of $521 million. Operating earnings for 2004 were $427 million, down from $500 million in 2003. Earnings declined due to factors such as mild weather, lower retail customer sales, and higher expenses. However, the company completed several regulatory proceedings favorably and expects earnings to improve in 2005 with resolution of outstanding rate cases and continued non-utility business growth. DTE Energy reconfirmed its 2005 earnings guidance of $3.30 to $3.60 per share.
Duke Energy reported strong financial results in the second quarter of 2004. Net income was $432 million, or $0.46 per share, matching the previous year's results. Excluding special items, ongoing earnings per share were $0.42 compared to $0.30 in 2003. Several of Duke Energy's business units performed well, including Duke Energy Field Services and Crescent Resources which both posted significant increases in earnings compared to the previous year. Duke Energy continued progress on meeting financial targets such as debt reduction and asset sales.
Duke Energy reported higher earnings per share in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the previous year. Earnings per share were $0.91 versus $0.34 in 2004, driven by gains from the sale of assets in the Field Services business and improved performance across most business units. Interest expense was lower due to debt reduction efforts. Duke Energy will hold an earnings call to discuss the results and outlook further.
Duke Energy reported second quarter 2005 earnings per share of $0.33, down from $0.46 in the second quarter of 2004. Mild weather led to lower sales for the Franchised Electric and DENA segments. Field Services and International posted strong results. Despite weather impacts, Duke Energy expects to meet its 2005 EPS target of $1.60 per share due to anticipated stronger performance in the second half of the year.
Duke Energy reported second quarter 2003 earnings per share of $0.46, including $0.16 from asset sales. Performance was impacted by cooler weather reducing electricity demand. Total first half 2003 earnings were $0.71 per share, including a $0.18 accounting change charge. Duke exceeded its $1.5 billion asset sale target and expects full-year earnings between $1.35-$1.60 per share.
Duke Energy reported higher third quarter 2004 earnings compared to third quarter 2003. Earnings per share increased to $0.41 per share from $0.05 per share in the prior year. Excluding special items, ongoing earnings per share were $0.38 compared to $0.35 in 2003. All business units are positioned to meet or exceed 2004 financial goals. Debt reduction for the year will exceed the $4 billion target, including $840 million retired through Australian asset sales.
- Duke Energy reported higher earnings per share in 2004 compared to a loss in 2003, exceeding its debt reduction and asset sale targets for the year.
- The Natural Gas Transmission and Field Services businesses produced record results in 2004.
- Duke Energy expects higher earnings in 2005 driven by increased earnings from Field Services, lower losses from Duke Energy North America, and lower interest expenses due to debt reduction.
This document is Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation's annual investors' report for 2005. Some key points:
- BNSF achieved record quarterly and annual revenue and earnings per share in 2005. Fourth quarter earnings were $1.13 per share, up 24% from 2004. Annual earnings were a record $4.01 per share.
- Freight revenues for the fourth quarter of 2005 increased 18% to $3.45 billion compared to 2004. For the full year, freight revenues increased 17% to $12.6 billion.
- Operating income for the fourth quarter was $800 million, up 20% from 2004. For 2005, operating income increased 73% to $2.92
DTE Energy reported 2004 earnings of $431 million, down from 2003 earnings of $521 million. Operating earnings for 2004 were $427 million, down from $500 million in 2003. Earnings declined due to factors such as mild weather, lower retail customer sales, and higher expenses. However, the company completed several regulatory proceedings favorably and expects earnings to improve in 2005 with resolution of outstanding rate cases and continued non-utility business growth. DTE Energy reconfirmed its 2005 earnings guidance of $3.30 to $3.60 per share.
Raytheon reported strong financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2005. Fourth quarter sales increased 9% to $6.2 billion and income from continuing operations grew 15% to $282 million. For the full year, sales rose 8% to $21.9 billion and income from continuing operations increased 115% to $942 million. Raytheon also reduced its net debt by $1.3 billion in 2005 to $3.3 billion, the lowest level in ten years, and generated $2.1 billion in free cash flow from continuing operations for the full year. Looking ahead, Raytheon expects 2006 sales between $23.1-23.6 billion and earnings per share from continuing operations of $
Progress Energy reported 2004 ongoing earnings of $3.06 per share and GAAP earnings of $3.13 per share. For the fourth quarter, ongoing earnings were $0.62 per share and GAAP earnings were $0.80 per share. For 2005, ongoing earnings guidance was set at $2.90 to $3.20 per share. Key drivers for 2005 earnings included customer growth and usage offset by higher O&M costs and the sale of Progress Rail. Significant events in 2004 included hurricane impacts, regulatory filings, and asset sales.
Progress Energy reported its fourth quarter and full year 2003 financial results. For 2003, ongoing earnings were $3.56 per share and GAAP earnings were $3.30 per share. For Q4 2003, ongoing earnings were $0.82 per share and GAAP earnings were $0.42 per share. Progress Energy set its 2004 ongoing earnings guidance range at $3.50 to $3.65 per share. Significant events in 2003 included strong performance of the company's nuclear power plants, new franchise agreements in Florida, and receiving an emergency response award for its response to the 2002 ice storm.
DTE Energy reported 2006 operating earnings of $593 million, or $3.33 per share, compared to 2005 operating earnings of $577 million, or $3.28 per share. Excluding synthetic fuels, 2006 operating earnings were $2.89 per share, above guidance. The company's electric utility had strong results due to higher rates and customers returning to service, while its gas utility saw lower earnings due to mild weather. DTE Energy reiterated 2007 operating earnings guidance, excluding synthetic fuels, of $2.60 to $2.80 per share and including synthetic fuels of $3.20 to $4.05 per share.
DTE Energy reported lower third quarter earnings compared to the previous year. Earnings were down due to a decline in operating earnings at Detroit Edison, impacted by mild weather and loss of customers to electric choice programs. While non-regulated businesses performed well, regulatory uncertainties at the utilities impacted overall results. Management expects resolutions to rate cases and improvements to electric choice programs to strengthen earnings in 2005.
Clear Channel Communications reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2004. Revenue increased 1% to $2.31 billion in Q4 2004 and 5% to $9.4 billion for the full year. Income was $214 million in Q4 2004 and $845.8 million for the full year. The company's radio broadcasting revenues grew 2% for the year due to strength in small and mid-sized markets. Outdoor advertising revenues increased 13% from higher rates and occupancy. The company will continue focusing on improving operations and driving profitability across its businesses.
DTE Energy reported a 25% increase in earnings for 2005 compared to 2004, driven by operational and regulatory improvements at its electric and gas utilities Detroit Edison and MichCon. It expects continued strong earnings growth in 2006 across all of its business segments. Non-utility operations performed well in 2005 and are expected to contribute further to earnings growth in 2006. The company provided guidance of $3.60 to $3.90 per share in operating earnings for 2006, a significant increase over 2005.
Duke Energy 04-29-04_PMA_DLH_1Q04_Earnings_Reviewfinance21
The document provides an earnings review for Duke Energy Corporation for the first quarter of 2004. It summarizes key financial highlights including reported EPS of $0.36 and EPS excluding special items of $0.32. It reviews performance across Duke Energy's business segments, noting solid earnings from regulated businesses and improved results from field services. It also discusses special items including a $325 million pre-tax loss from the anticipated sale of Southeast generation assets. The document indicates progress on financial plans including $200 million in debt reductions and $1.5 billion in asset sale proceeds to date.
Duke Energy reported higher ongoing diluted EPS of $0.43 per share compared to $0.32 in the prior year's quarter. Revenues were lower at $4.04 billion compared to $5.27 billion due to the deconsolidation of DEFS, but this was partially offset by the addition of Cinergy's operations. Strong performances from Gas Transmission, Field Services and Crescent helped deliver solid results, and the company remains on track to achieve its 2006 EPS target.
Duke Energy reported third quarter 2006 results, with ongoing diluted EPS of 48 cents, down from 56 cents in the prior year's quarter. Reported diluted EPS was 60 cents, up from 4 cents in 2005. The company remains on track to meet its 2006 ongoing EPS target after adjusting for the sale of its Commercial Marketing and Trading business. During the quarter, Duke Energy created a joint venture for its Crescent Resources business, yielding $1.4 billion in after-tax cash proceeds. Business unit results were mixed compared to the prior year, with the Franchised Electric & Gas unit up but other units such as Natural Gas Transmission down due to various factors including costs and weather.
DTE Energy reported first quarter earnings of $149 million compared to $190 million in the first quarter of 2004. Operating earnings, which exclude non-recurring items, were $153 million compared to $152 million in the prior year. The company reconfirmed its 2005 earnings guidance range of $3.30 to $3.60 per share. Several business units saw lower earnings due to timing factors but the company expects to meet its annual targets.
Progress Energy reported third quarter 2004 ongoing earnings of $1.01 per share compared to $1.28 per share in the third quarter of 2003. GAAP earnings were $1.25 per share compared to $1.33 per share. Earnings from core utility businesses were strong but offset by lower synthetic fuel production tax credits. Hurricane damage restoration costs totaled $379 million. Progress Energy reaffirmed 2004 ongoing earnings guidance of $2.95 to $3.10 per share and announced developments in an IRS audit of synthetic fuel tax credits.
DTE Energy reported 2002 earnings of $632 million or $3.83 per diluted share, up 10% from 2001 operating earnings. Earnings for the fourth quarter of 2002 were $203 million or $1.21 per diluted share, down from 2001 operating earnings of $1.43 per diluted share. The company reaffirmed its 2003 earnings guidance of $3.90 to $4.10 per share despite anticipated challenges. By business unit, DTE Energy Resources contributed earnings growth while DTE Energy Distribution saw declines due to storm costs and DTE Energy Gas saw increases.
Raytheon Reports 2004 Third Quarter Resultsfinance12
- Raytheon reported Q3 sales of $4.9 billion, up 12.7% from 2003, and earnings of $0.41 per share.
- Backlog reached a record $32.8 billion driven by strong bookings of $5.7 billion in Q3.
- Free cash flow for Q3 was $204 million including a $210 million payment for the settlement of a shareholder lawsuit.
- Guidance for 2004 was increased for GAAP EPS to $0.87-$0.92 and excludes the settlement payment.
The document summarizes Duke Energy's financial results for the third quarter of 2005. It reports higher earnings in the company's franchised electric, natural gas transmission, and international energy segments. It also discusses the financial impacts of Duke Energy's decision to exit its North American commercial power business. Finally, it provides expectations for 2005 ongoing earnings per share and 2007 ongoing earnings following the planned merger with Cinergy.
edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189finance21
This document is Southern California Edison Company's 2005 Annual Report. Southern California Edison Company (SCE) is one of the largest electric utilities in the US, serving over 50,000 square miles in central and southern California. The annual report includes SCE's management discussion and analysis, financial statements, notes to the financial statements, and information about SCE's board of directors and management team. In 2005, SCE focused on executing its strategic plan, which included managing growth through infrastructure investments, strengthening its balance sheet, and ensuring adequate power resources.
Cinergy reported net income of $117 million for Q1 2005, compared to $103 million for Q1 2004. Earnings per share were $0.60 compared to $0.57 the previous year. The Regulated Businesses segment contributed $0.39 per share while the Commercial Businesses segment contributed $0.23 per share. Cinergy reaffirmed its 2005 earnings guidance of $2.70 to $2.85 per share, excluding mark-to-market impacts.
edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186finance21
Southern California Edison Company (SCE) is one of the largest electric utilities in the US, serving central and southern California. SCE earned $2.4 billion in 2001 after incurring losses in 2000 due to deregulation issues. SCE's earnings included a $2.1 billion benefit from establishing regulatory assets to recover past power costs. Operating revenue increased in 2001 due to surcharges and decreased credits for direct access customers, partially offset by lower sales and penalties. SCE continues working to stabilize rates and recover prior power procurement costs.
This document is Textron's 1999 Annual Report. The key points are:
1) Textron achieved record financial results in 1999 with revenues increasing 20% to $11.6 billion and earnings per share increasing 51%.
2) Textron's four business segments - Aircraft, Automotive, Industrial, and Finance - saw strong growth and profitability in 1999.
3) Textron is focused on consistent growth through strategic investments, acquisitions, driving operational excellence, and leveraging e-business.
The document provides details from Cummins Inc.'s first quarter 2007 earnings teleconference call. It includes:
1) Introductions from Cummins leadership and details on forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures.
2) Financial highlights for each business segment, noting sales and earnings growth or declines compared to Q1 2006.
3) Consolidated financial results for Cummins, guidance for 2007, and investments to support future growth.
4) Questions were taken from participants on the call.
Raytheon reported strong financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2005. Fourth quarter sales increased 9% to $6.2 billion and income from continuing operations grew 15% to $282 million. For the full year, sales rose 8% to $21.9 billion and income from continuing operations increased 115% to $942 million. Raytheon also reduced its net debt by $1.3 billion in 2005 to $3.3 billion, the lowest level in ten years, and generated $2.1 billion in free cash flow from continuing operations for the full year. Looking ahead, Raytheon expects 2006 sales between $23.1-23.6 billion and earnings per share from continuing operations of $
Progress Energy reported 2004 ongoing earnings of $3.06 per share and GAAP earnings of $3.13 per share. For the fourth quarter, ongoing earnings were $0.62 per share and GAAP earnings were $0.80 per share. For 2005, ongoing earnings guidance was set at $2.90 to $3.20 per share. Key drivers for 2005 earnings included customer growth and usage offset by higher O&M costs and the sale of Progress Rail. Significant events in 2004 included hurricane impacts, regulatory filings, and asset sales.
Progress Energy reported its fourth quarter and full year 2003 financial results. For 2003, ongoing earnings were $3.56 per share and GAAP earnings were $3.30 per share. For Q4 2003, ongoing earnings were $0.82 per share and GAAP earnings were $0.42 per share. Progress Energy set its 2004 ongoing earnings guidance range at $3.50 to $3.65 per share. Significant events in 2003 included strong performance of the company's nuclear power plants, new franchise agreements in Florida, and receiving an emergency response award for its response to the 2002 ice storm.
DTE Energy reported 2006 operating earnings of $593 million, or $3.33 per share, compared to 2005 operating earnings of $577 million, or $3.28 per share. Excluding synthetic fuels, 2006 operating earnings were $2.89 per share, above guidance. The company's electric utility had strong results due to higher rates and customers returning to service, while its gas utility saw lower earnings due to mild weather. DTE Energy reiterated 2007 operating earnings guidance, excluding synthetic fuels, of $2.60 to $2.80 per share and including synthetic fuels of $3.20 to $4.05 per share.
DTE Energy reported lower third quarter earnings compared to the previous year. Earnings were down due to a decline in operating earnings at Detroit Edison, impacted by mild weather and loss of customers to electric choice programs. While non-regulated businesses performed well, regulatory uncertainties at the utilities impacted overall results. Management expects resolutions to rate cases and improvements to electric choice programs to strengthen earnings in 2005.
Clear Channel Communications reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2004. Revenue increased 1% to $2.31 billion in Q4 2004 and 5% to $9.4 billion for the full year. Income was $214 million in Q4 2004 and $845.8 million for the full year. The company's radio broadcasting revenues grew 2% for the year due to strength in small and mid-sized markets. Outdoor advertising revenues increased 13% from higher rates and occupancy. The company will continue focusing on improving operations and driving profitability across its businesses.
DTE Energy reported a 25% increase in earnings for 2005 compared to 2004, driven by operational and regulatory improvements at its electric and gas utilities Detroit Edison and MichCon. It expects continued strong earnings growth in 2006 across all of its business segments. Non-utility operations performed well in 2005 and are expected to contribute further to earnings growth in 2006. The company provided guidance of $3.60 to $3.90 per share in operating earnings for 2006, a significant increase over 2005.
Duke Energy 04-29-04_PMA_DLH_1Q04_Earnings_Reviewfinance21
The document provides an earnings review for Duke Energy Corporation for the first quarter of 2004. It summarizes key financial highlights including reported EPS of $0.36 and EPS excluding special items of $0.32. It reviews performance across Duke Energy's business segments, noting solid earnings from regulated businesses and improved results from field services. It also discusses special items including a $325 million pre-tax loss from the anticipated sale of Southeast generation assets. The document indicates progress on financial plans including $200 million in debt reductions and $1.5 billion in asset sale proceeds to date.
Duke Energy reported higher ongoing diluted EPS of $0.43 per share compared to $0.32 in the prior year's quarter. Revenues were lower at $4.04 billion compared to $5.27 billion due to the deconsolidation of DEFS, but this was partially offset by the addition of Cinergy's operations. Strong performances from Gas Transmission, Field Services and Crescent helped deliver solid results, and the company remains on track to achieve its 2006 EPS target.
Duke Energy reported third quarter 2006 results, with ongoing diluted EPS of 48 cents, down from 56 cents in the prior year's quarter. Reported diluted EPS was 60 cents, up from 4 cents in 2005. The company remains on track to meet its 2006 ongoing EPS target after adjusting for the sale of its Commercial Marketing and Trading business. During the quarter, Duke Energy created a joint venture for its Crescent Resources business, yielding $1.4 billion in after-tax cash proceeds. Business unit results were mixed compared to the prior year, with the Franchised Electric & Gas unit up but other units such as Natural Gas Transmission down due to various factors including costs and weather.
DTE Energy reported first quarter earnings of $149 million compared to $190 million in the first quarter of 2004. Operating earnings, which exclude non-recurring items, were $153 million compared to $152 million in the prior year. The company reconfirmed its 2005 earnings guidance range of $3.30 to $3.60 per share. Several business units saw lower earnings due to timing factors but the company expects to meet its annual targets.
Progress Energy reported third quarter 2004 ongoing earnings of $1.01 per share compared to $1.28 per share in the third quarter of 2003. GAAP earnings were $1.25 per share compared to $1.33 per share. Earnings from core utility businesses were strong but offset by lower synthetic fuel production tax credits. Hurricane damage restoration costs totaled $379 million. Progress Energy reaffirmed 2004 ongoing earnings guidance of $2.95 to $3.10 per share and announced developments in an IRS audit of synthetic fuel tax credits.
DTE Energy reported 2002 earnings of $632 million or $3.83 per diluted share, up 10% from 2001 operating earnings. Earnings for the fourth quarter of 2002 were $203 million or $1.21 per diluted share, down from 2001 operating earnings of $1.43 per diluted share. The company reaffirmed its 2003 earnings guidance of $3.90 to $4.10 per share despite anticipated challenges. By business unit, DTE Energy Resources contributed earnings growth while DTE Energy Distribution saw declines due to storm costs and DTE Energy Gas saw increases.
Raytheon Reports 2004 Third Quarter Resultsfinance12
- Raytheon reported Q3 sales of $4.9 billion, up 12.7% from 2003, and earnings of $0.41 per share.
- Backlog reached a record $32.8 billion driven by strong bookings of $5.7 billion in Q3.
- Free cash flow for Q3 was $204 million including a $210 million payment for the settlement of a shareholder lawsuit.
- Guidance for 2004 was increased for GAAP EPS to $0.87-$0.92 and excludes the settlement payment.
The document summarizes Duke Energy's financial results for the third quarter of 2005. It reports higher earnings in the company's franchised electric, natural gas transmission, and international energy segments. It also discusses the financial impacts of Duke Energy's decision to exit its North American commercial power business. Finally, it provides expectations for 2005 ongoing earnings per share and 2007 ongoing earnings following the planned merger with Cinergy.
edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189finance21
This document is Southern California Edison Company's 2005 Annual Report. Southern California Edison Company (SCE) is one of the largest electric utilities in the US, serving over 50,000 square miles in central and southern California. The annual report includes SCE's management discussion and analysis, financial statements, notes to the financial statements, and information about SCE's board of directors and management team. In 2005, SCE focused on executing its strategic plan, which included managing growth through infrastructure investments, strengthening its balance sheet, and ensuring adequate power resources.
Cinergy reported net income of $117 million for Q1 2005, compared to $103 million for Q1 2004. Earnings per share were $0.60 compared to $0.57 the previous year. The Regulated Businesses segment contributed $0.39 per share while the Commercial Businesses segment contributed $0.23 per share. Cinergy reaffirmed its 2005 earnings guidance of $2.70 to $2.85 per share, excluding mark-to-market impacts.
edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186finance21
Southern California Edison Company (SCE) is one of the largest electric utilities in the US, serving central and southern California. SCE earned $2.4 billion in 2001 after incurring losses in 2000 due to deregulation issues. SCE's earnings included a $2.1 billion benefit from establishing regulatory assets to recover past power costs. Operating revenue increased in 2001 due to surcharges and decreased credits for direct access customers, partially offset by lower sales and penalties. SCE continues working to stabilize rates and recover prior power procurement costs.
This document is Textron's 1999 Annual Report. The key points are:
1) Textron achieved record financial results in 1999 with revenues increasing 20% to $11.6 billion and earnings per share increasing 51%.
2) Textron's four business segments - Aircraft, Automotive, Industrial, and Finance - saw strong growth and profitability in 1999.
3) Textron is focused on consistent growth through strategic investments, acquisitions, driving operational excellence, and leveraging e-business.
The document provides details from Cummins Inc.'s first quarter 2007 earnings teleconference call. It includes:
1) Introductions from Cummins leadership and details on forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures.
2) Financial highlights for each business segment, noting sales and earnings growth or declines compared to Q1 2006.
3) Consolidated financial results for Cummins, guidance for 2007, and investments to support future growth.
4) Questions were taken from participants on the call.
DTE Energy reported 2004 earnings of $431 million, down from 2003 earnings of $521 million. Operating earnings for 2004 were $427 million, down from $500 million in 2003. The company maintained its 2005 earnings guidance of $3.30 to $3.60 per share. Key factors impacting 2004 results included mild weather, lower utility sales from customer choice programs, and higher power plant and benefit costs. However, the company completed favorable rate cases and expects regulatory resolutions and non-utility growth to improve 2005 earnings.
TXU Corp reported a net loss of $4.2 billion for 2002 due to write-offs related to exiting its European business. Excluding unusual charges, net income was $622 million. For 2003, TXU expects earnings per share between $1.95-$2.05, driven by cost reductions and growth in its energy delivery businesses in North America and Australia. Cash from operations is projected to be $2.3 billion, allowing $1.5 billion to reduce debt after capital expenditures and dividends.
Duke Energy reported third quarter 2005 earnings per share of $0.04 compared to $0.41 in the third quarter of 2004. Ongoing earnings per share, which excludes special items, were $0.59 compared to $0.37 in the prior year. Results were boosted by warmer weather and strong performance in gas and electric businesses, but hurt by charges from exiting the DENA business. Duke Energy remains confident in exceeding its $1.65 per share employee incentive target for the year.
Duke Energy reported third quarter 2003 earnings per share of $0.05 compared to $0.27 in third quarter 2002. Excluding special items, earnings per share was $0.35 compared to $0.51 the previous year. The company implemented a cost reduction plan expected to reduce annual pretax expenses by over $200 million. Duke Energy is on track to pay down $1.8 billion in debt by the end of the year and $5.5 billion by the end of 2005.
energy future holindings TXU_Q4_2003_Earnings_Packfinance29
TXU reported strong financial results for 2003, delivering earnings of $715 million compared to $160 million in 2002. Net income for 2003 was $560 million compared to a net loss of $4.232 billion in 2002. For the fourth quarter of 2003, earnings were $66 million compared to a loss of $547 million in the same period of 2002. All business segments contributed increased earnings, with the Energy segment delivering $493 million for the full year compared to $319 million in 2002. Management expects to deliver 2004 earnings of $2.15 per share.
Duke Energy reported first quarter 2006 results, with ongoing diluted EPS of 48 cents, up from 43 cents in the prior year. Reported diluted EPS was 37 cents compared to 88 cents last year. Results improved at Franchised Electric, Natural Gas Transmission, and International Energy segments due to factors like customer growth, currency impacts, and improved prices and volumes. Duke Energy is on track to achieve its 2006 target of $1.90 in ongoing diluted EPS and remains comfortable after merging with Cinergy that it can achieve this target for the combined company.
DTE Energy reported second quarter earnings of $35 million compared to a loss of $39 million in the second quarter of 2003. Operating earnings, which exclude non-recurring items, were $39 million in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $70 million in the same period of 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, reported earnings were $225 million compared to $116 million in 2003. Operating earnings were negatively impacted by Michigan's Electric Choice program and increased pension and healthcare expenses at Detroit Edison and MichCon. However, non-regulated businesses performed well with increased earnings from coal and energy marketing.
DTE Energy reported second quarter earnings of $35 million compared to a loss of $39 million in the second quarter of 2003. Operating earnings, which exclude non-recurring items, were $39 million in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $70 million in the same period of 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, reported earnings were $225 million compared to $116 million in 2003. Operating earnings were negatively impacted by Michigan's Electric Choice program and increased pension and healthcare expenses at Detroit Edison and MichCon. DTE Energy expects higher earnings from its synfuels business and increased its 2004 earnings guidance for non-regulated businesses.
DTE Energy reported earnings for 2003 fell 18% from 2002, driven by weak results at its utility subsidiaries, Detroit Edison and MichCon. Earnings at Detroit Edison dropped 31% due to impacts of Michigan's Electric Choice program, as well as higher costs and mild weather. MichCon saw a 26% rise in operating expenses. The CEO noted regulatory issues need resolution and Electric Choice program flaws addressed for financial health of the utilities. Non-regulated operations increased earnings 7% and continued stable growth, but regulated businesses face financial pressure until regulatory issues are resolved.
DTE Energy reported earnings of $521 million for 2003, down 18% from 2002, driven by weak results at its utility subsidiaries Detroit Edison and MichCon. Detroit Edison's earnings dropped 31% to $246 million due to impacts of Michigan's electric choice program, higher costs such as pensions and healthcare, and storms. MichCon saw a 26% rise in operating costs. The CEO said they need rate relief from the MPSC and changes to the electric choice program to make it fair to customers and utilities.
DTE Energy reported first quarter earnings of $149 million compared to $190 million in the first quarter of 2004. Operating earnings, which exclude non-recurring items, were $153 million compared to $152 million in the prior year. The company reconfirmed its 2005 earnings guidance range of $3.30 to $3.60 per share. Several business units saw lower earnings due to timing factors but the company expects to meet its annual targets. Moody's upgraded its outlook for DTE Energy to stable due to expected improvement in financial performance over the next few years.
Duke Energy reported financial results for the full year and fourth quarter of 2003. Key highlights include:
1) Regulated utilities and field services showed strong operational and financial performance, while merchant operations produced a loss.
2) Duke Energy exceeded its targets for non-strategic asset sales of over $2 billion and debt reduction of $2.2 billion.
3) Special pre-tax charges of $3.4 billion were taken in the fourth quarter to reduce exposure to merchant generation and international businesses.
4) Annual dividend was maintained at $1.10 per share and debt reduction between $3.5-4 billion is expected in 2004 to strengthen the company's financial position.
TXU reported better than expected earnings for the first quarter of 2003, with earnings from continuing operations of $101 million (exceeding the target of $0.20 per share). Full year 2003 guidance remains at $1.95 to $2.05 per share. Earnings were higher than expected due to increased contributions from the North America Energy Delivery segment and cost reductions, though partially offset by higher fuel costs and interest expenses. TXU has also accomplished debt reduction and cost cutting objectives to strengthen its financial position.
DTE Energy reported a 25% increase in earnings for 2005 compared to 2004, driven by operational and regulatory improvements at its electric and gas utilities Detroit Edison and MichCon. It expects continued strong earnings growth in 2006 across all of its business segments. Non-utility operations performed well in 2005 and are expected to contribute further to earnings growth in 2006. The company provided guidance of $3.60 to $3.90 per share in operating earnings for 2006, a significant increase over 2005.
Progress Energy reported earnings of $2.65 per share for 2001, meeting expectations. Earnings were positively impacted by its non-regulated businesses which offset the effects of mild weather and an industrial slowdown. It also received tax rulings for four synthetic fuel plants and reaffirmed its 2002 guidance of $3.90 to $4.10 per share.
DTE Energy reported 2006 earnings of $433 million, down from $537 million in 2005, due to reduced synthetic fuel production and asset impairments. However, operating earnings were $593 million in 2006, up from $577 million in 2005, driven by better performance at Detroit Edison and Energy Trading. Cash flow from operations increased 50% to $1.5 billion in 2006. DTE Energy expects 2007 operating earnings, excluding synthetic fuel, to be $2.60-$2.80 per share and synthetic fuel to contribute $0.60-$1.25 per share.
Celanese Corporation reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2004. For the fourth quarter, net sales increased 15% to $1.33 billion due to higher pricing, currency effects, and volume. However, net earnings declined to a loss of $57 million due to higher interest expenses, impairment charges, and unusual items. For the full year, net sales increased 10% to $5.07 billion but net earnings declined to a loss of $175 million mainly due to restructuring charges, interest expenses, and impairment charges. Celanese expects adjusted EBITDA to increase 25-30% in the first quarter of 2005 and grow 12-17% for the full year 2005.
DTE Energy reported lower second quarter earnings compared to the previous year, but operating earnings were higher. While the electric and gas utilities saw improved earnings, the non-utility businesses had lower earnings due to accounting deferrals and oil hedging losses. However, DTE Energy reaffirmed its full-year operating earnings guidance.
DTE Energy reported lower second quarter earnings compared to the previous year, but operating earnings were higher. While the electric and gas utilities saw improved earnings, the non-utility businesses had lower earnings due to accounting deferrals and oil hedging losses. However, DTE Energy reaffirmed its full-year operating earnings guidance.
DTE Energy reported 2002 earnings of $632 million or $3.83 per diluted share, up 10% from 2001 operating earnings. Earnings for the fourth quarter of 2002 were $203 million or $1.21 per diluted share, down from $1.43 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2001. The company reaffirmed its 2003 earnings guidance of $3.90 to $4.10 per share. Key drivers for the full year included higher earnings from energy resources and gas distribution, partially offset by lower earnings from energy distribution and higher interest and corporate expenses.
ConAgra Foods is selling its chicken business to focus on branded and value-added food items. The sale includes chicken processing operations and will generate cash for ConAgra to reinvest. ConAgra will receive Class A shares in Pilgrim's Pride, the chicken company acquiring its business, representing 7% of voting shares and 49% of equity. It can sell up to 1/3 of these shares annually but expects to reduce ownership over time based on market conditions. ConAgra will also receive notes from Pilgrim's Pride due in 2011 with a 10.5% interest rate to be paid semi-annually.
This document summarizes the Q1 FY2004 earnings results of a large packaged foods company. Key points include:
- Q1 EPS was $0.37 compared to $0.43 in Q1 FY2003, impacted by various one-time gains and losses.
- Packaged foods sales were down $168M excluding divested businesses, with a 5% volume decline.
- Several major brands saw growth, while others like Butterball declined.
- Corporate expenses increased due to litigation expenses from a past joint venture.
- The effective tax rate for FY2004 is estimated at 38%.
ConAgra Foods is selling its United Agri Products business to focus on branded and value-added products, as part of a broader strategy of divesting non-core businesses over the past year including fresh beef/pork, canned seafood, and cheese operations. The sale is expected to close by December 31, 2003 for cash and $60-75 million in preferred stock. ConAgra will retain some international UAP operations generating $250 million in annual sales, concentrated in several countries. Proceeds will be used for debt paydown and general corporate purposes including acquisitions and stock buybacks.
ConAgra Foods divested its poultry business to focus on branded, value-added foods with strong margins and growth. The $300 million cash and 25 million Pilgrim's Pride shares valued at $245 million totaled less than the poultry business' estimated $545 million book value due to the shares being valued based on past prices, not current prices. ConAgra Foods can sell up to 1/3 of the shares each year and account for shares eligible for resale within a year as securities, and other shares using cost accounting. The poultry business was previously reported in Meat Processing but is now in Discontinued Operations.
ConAgra Foods completed the divestiture of its chicken processing and crop inputs businesses, finalizing its strategy to focus on branded, value-added food opportunities. The company received $300 million in cash and 25 million shares of Pilgrim's Pride stock worth $245 million for the chicken business. ConAgra can sell up to 1/3 of the Pilgrim's Pride shares per year and will account for the shares as securities held for resale within one year or using the cost method if the eligibility for resale is over one year away. The chicken business was previously reported as part of ConAgra's Meat Processing segment but is now in Discontinued Operations.
ConAgra Foods has divested several commodity businesses and acquired branded and value-added food products to focus on higher margin businesses. The company is planning a share repurchase program using cash from strong operating cash flows and recent divestitures. ConAgra expects to continue investing in growth through acquisitions and paying down debt while deploying cash to dividends, debt repayment, and share repurchases as appropriate.
The document provides a Q&A summary of ConAgra Foods' financial results for Q2 FY04 compared to Q2 FY03. Key points include:
- Q2 FY04 diluted EPS was $0.51 compared to $0.44 in Q2 FY03, impacted by $0.04 in discontinued operations in FY04 and $0.03 in divestiture expenses in FY03.
- Sales comparability was impacted by $506M in divested fresh meat businesses in FY03 and $154M in divested canned food businesses in FY03.
- Examples of brand sales growth included Banquet, Chef Boyardee, Egg Beaters
Packaged Foods sales increased 4% excluding divestitures, with 2% volume growth. Several brands posted sales growth including Armour, Banquet, and Blue Bonnet, while others like ACT II and Butterball declined. Sales comparability was affected by $155 million in divested businesses last year. Operating profit grew 5% in Packaged Foods and 10% overall when adjusting for divested businesses and cost savings initiatives. The company is implementing cost cutting measures expected to save more than implementation costs in the future.
The document provides the quarterly and annual financial results for a company. Some key highlights include:
- Several consumer brands posted sales growth for the quarter including Banquet, Blue Bonnet, and Chef Boyardee, while others like ACT II and Eckrich saw declines.
- Total depreciation and amortization was around $93 million for the quarter and $352 million for the fiscal year.
- Capital expenditures were around $106 million for the quarter and $352 million for the fiscal year.
- Net interest expense was $80 million for the quarter and $275 million for the fiscal year.
- Corporate expenses were around $95 million for the quarter and $342 million
- Major brands in the Retail Products segment that posted sales growth included ACT II, Armour, Banquet, and Blue Bonnet. Brands that posted sales declines included Healthy Choice, Slim Jim, and Snack Pack.
- Retail volume increased 8% while foodservice volume was flat excluding divested businesses.
- Increased input costs negatively impacted operating profits in the Retail Products segment by approximately $45 million.
- Capital expenditures were approximately $105 million, reflecting increased investment in information systems.
This document contains the questions and answers from ConAgra Foods' Q2 FY2005 earnings call. Some key details include:
- Several major brands in the Retail Products segment posted sales growth, while others saw declines.
- Retail volume increased 7% and Foodservice volume decreased 1% excluding divested businesses.
- Capital expenditures increased significantly year-over-year due to investments in information systems.
- The company received proceeds from the sale of its minority interest in Swift Foods and shares of Pilgrim's Pride stock.
This document summarizes the Q3 2005 earnings results of a major food company. Some key highlights include: 1) Major brands in the Retail Products segment saw mixed sales results, with growth for brands like Chef Boyardee but declines for brands like Butterball. 2) Unit volumes declined 3% for Retail Products but increased 4% for Foodservice Products. 3) The packaged meats operations were slightly profitable but profits were over $45 million lower than the previous year. The company expects some improvement but not year-over-year profit gains for packaged meats in Q4.
This document summarizes ConAgra Foods' earnings results for fiscal year 2005 (FY05) in a question and answer format. Some key details include:
- FY05 diluted EPS was $1.23, including $0.12 in expenses that impacted comparability.
- Major brands in the Retail Products segment that saw sales growth included ACT II, Banquet, and Blue Bonnet. Brands that saw declines included Armour and Butterball.
- Retail Products volume increased 2% while Foodservice Products volume decreased 2% in Q4.
- Total depreciation and amortization was approximately $351 million for FY05 and $90 million for Q4. Capital expenditures
The document provides the questions and answers from the Q1 FY06 earnings call for ConAgra Foods. Some key details from the summary include:
- Sales grew for major brands like Butterball but declined for brands like ACT II. Retail Products volume declined 3% while Foodservice increased 4%.
- Depreciation and amortization was $89 million. Capital expenditures were $71 million and net interest expense was $68 million. Corporate expense was $73 million.
- Gross margin was 21.6% and operating margin was 10.9%. The effective tax rate for FY06 is estimated to be 36%.
Major brands in the Retail Products segment that posted sales growth included ACT II, Blue Bonnet, Butterball, Kid Cuisine, Marie Callender's, Reddi-wip and Ro*Tel. Brands that posted sales declines included Armour, Banquet, Cook's, DAVID, Eckrich, Egg Beaters, Healthy Choice, Hebrew National, Hunt's, LaChoy, Orville Redenbacher, PAM, Parkay, Peter Pan, Slim Jim, Snack Pack, Swiss Miss, Van Camp's and Wesson. Retail Products volume declined 5% for the quarter while Foodservice Products volume increased 2%. Corporate expense for the quarter was approximately $103 million
The document provides financial information from ConAgra Foods' Q3 FY06 quarterly earnings call. Some key details include:
- Retail segment sales grew 4% and Foodservice grew 1% over the prior year. Several major brands posted sales growth while others declined.
- Gross margin was 24.8% and operating margin was 12.5% for the quarter.
- Net debt was $3.6 billion, down from $4.5 billion a year prior due to debt repayment of $500 million during the quarter.
- Capital expenditures for the quarter and fiscal year-to-date were below prior year levels. Projected fiscal year expenditures are up to $400
- Major brands in the Consumer Foods segment that posted sales growth in Q4 FY06 included Blue Bonnet, Chef Boyardee, DAVID, Egg Beaters, Hebrew National, and Hunt's. Brands that posted sales declines included ACT II, Banquet, Healthy Choice, Peter Pan, Slim Jim, Snack Pack, and Van Camp's.
- Consumer Foods volume declined 2% in Q4 while Food and Ingredients volume increased 1%.
- Total depreciation and amortization for Q4 was approximately $85 million and approximately $353 million for all of FY06. Capital expenditures were approximately $92 million for Q4 and $288 million for FY
This document summarizes the Q1 FY07 financial results of ConAgra Foods. Some key highlights include:
- Consumer Foods volume increased 1% and Food and Ingredients volume increased 2% in Q1.
- Gross margin was 24.7% and operating margin was 11.7% for the quarter.
- Net debt decreased to $2.88 billion from $3.97 billion in Q1 FY06.
- Restructuring charges totaled $39 million pre-tax, impacting costs in Consumer Foods and corporate expenses.
Major brands in the Consumer Foods segment that posted sales growth included Egg Beaters, Healthy Choice, and Slim Jim. Brands that posted sales declines included ACT II and Blue Bonnet. Total depreciation and amortization from continuing operations was $88 million for the quarter and $177 million year-to-date. Capital expenditures were $66 million for the quarter and $111 million year-to-date. Net interest expense was $52 million for the quarter and $110 million year-to-date.
1) Several major brands in the Consumer Foods segment posted sales growth for the quarter, while others like ACT II and Banquet saw declines. Overall, Consumer Foods volume declined 1% excluding divested businesses.
2) Total depreciation and amortization from continuing operations was around $91 million for the quarter and $268 million year-to-date. Capital expenditures were around $147 million for the quarter and $258 million year-to-date.
3) The company's net debt at the end of the quarter was around $3 billion, with a net debt to total capital ratio of 39%.
How to Invest in Cryptocurrency for Beginners: A Complete GuideDaniel
Cryptocurrency is digital money that operates independently of a central authority, utilizing cryptography for security. Unlike traditional currencies issued by governments (fiat currencies), cryptocurrencies are decentralized and typically operate on a technology called blockchain. Each cryptocurrency transaction is recorded on a public ledger, ensuring transparency and security.
Cryptocurrencies can be used for various purposes, including online purchases, investment opportunities, and as a means of transferring value globally without the need for intermediaries like banks.
South Dakota State University degree offer diploma Transcriptynfqplhm
办理美国SDSU毕业证书制作南达科他州立大学假文凭定制Q微168899991做SDSU留信网教留服认证海牙认证改SDSU成绩单GPA做SDSU假学位证假文凭高仿毕业证GRE代考如何申请南达科他州立大学South Dakota State University degree offer diploma Transcript
Every business, big or small, deals with outgoing payments. Whether it’s to suppliers for inventory, to employees for salaries, or to vendors for services rendered, keeping track of these expenses is crucial. This is where payment vouchers come in – the unsung heroes of the accounting world.
Monthly Market Risk Update: June 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
Markets rallied in May, with all three major U.S. equity indices up for the month, said Sam Millette, director of fixed income, in his latest Market Risk Update.
For more market updates, subscribe to The Independent Market Observer at https://blog.commonwealth.com/independent-market-observer.
What Lessons Can New Investors Learn from Newman Leech’s Success?Newman Leech
Newman Leech's success in the real estate industry is based on key lessons and principles, offering practical advice for new investors and serving as a blueprint for building a successful career.
“Amidst Tempered Optimism” Main economic trends in May 2024 based on the results of the New Monthly Enterprises Survey, #NRES
On 12 June 2024 the Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting (IER) held an online event “Economic Trends from a Business Perspective (May 2024)”.
During the event, the results of the 25-th monthly survey of business executives “Ukrainian Business during the war”, which was conducted in May 2024, were presented.
The field stage of the 25-th wave lasted from May 20 to May 31, 2024. In May, 532 companies were surveyed.
The enterprise managers compared the work results in May 2024 with April, assessed the indicators at the time of the survey (May 2024), and gave forecasts for the next two, three, or six months, depending on the question. In certain issues (where indicated), the work results were compared with the pre-war period (before February 24, 2022).
✅ More survey results in the presentation.
✅ Video presentation: https://youtu.be/4ZvsSKd1MzE
13 Jun 24 ILC Retirement Income Summit - slides.pptxILC- UK
ILC's Retirement Income Summit was hosted by M&G and supported by Canada Life. The event brought together key policymakers, influencers and experts to help identify policy priorities for the next Government and ensure more of us have access to a decent income in retirement.
Contributors included:
Jo Blanden, Professor in Economics, University of Surrey
Clive Bolton, CEO, Life Insurance M&G Plc
Jim Boyd, CEO, Equity Release Council
Molly Broome, Economist, Resolution Foundation
Nida Broughton, Co-Director of Economic Policy, Behavioural Insights Team
Jonathan Cribb, Associate Director and Head of Retirement, Savings, and Ageing, Institute for Fiscal Studies
Joanna Elson CBE, Chief Executive Officer, Independent Age
Tom Evans, Managing Director of Retirement, Canada Life
Steve Groves, Chair, Key Retirement Group
Tish Hanifan, Founder and Joint Chair of the Society of Later life Advisers
Sue Lewis, ILC Trustee
Siobhan Lough, Senior Consultant, Hymans Robertson
Mick McAteer, Co-Director, The Financial Inclusion Centre
Stuart McDonald MBE, Head of Longevity and Democratic Insights, LCP
Anusha Mittal, Managing Director, Individual Life and Pensions, M&G Life
Shelley Morris, Senior Project Manager, Living Pension, Living Wage Foundation
Sarah O'Grady, Journalist
Will Sherlock, Head of External Relations, M&G Plc
Daniela Silcock, Head of Policy Research, Pensions Policy Institute
David Sinclair, Chief Executive, ILC
Jordi Skilbeck, Senior Policy Advisor, Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association
Rt Hon Sir Stephen Timms, former Chair, Work & Pensions Committee
Nigel Waterson, ILC Trustee
Jackie Wells, Strategy and Policy Consultant, ILC Strategic Advisory Board
Budgeting as a Control Tool in Government Accounting in Nigeria
Being a Paper Presented at the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) Budget Office Staff at Sojourner Hotel, GRA, Ikeja Lagos on Saturday 8th June, 2024.
Explore the world of investments with an in-depth comparison of the stock market and real estate. Understand their fundamentals, risks, returns, and diversification strategies to make informed financial decisions that align with your goals.
How Poonawalla Fincorp and IndusInd Bank’s Co-Branded RuPay Credit Card Cater...beulahfernandes8
The eLITE RuPay Platinum Credit Card, a strategic collaboration between Poonawalla Fincorp and IndusInd Bank, represents a significant advancement in India's digital financial landscape. Spearheaded by Abhay Bhutada, MD of Poonawalla Fincorp, the card leverages deep customer insights to offer tailored features such as no joining fees, movie ticket offers, and rewards on UPI transactions. IndusInd Bank's solid banking infrastructure and digital integration expertise ensure seamless service delivery in today's fast-paced digital economy. With a focus on meeting the growing demand for digital financial services, the card aims to cater to tech-savvy consumers and differentiate itself through unique features and superior customer service, ultimately poised to make a substantial impact in India's digital financial services space.
A toxic combination of 15 years of low growth, and four decades of high inequality, has left Britain poorer and falling behind its peers. Productivity growth is weak and public investment is low, while wages today are no higher than they were before the financial crisis. Britain needs a new economic strategy to lift itself out of stagnation.
Scotland is in many ways a microcosm of this challenge. It has become a hub for creative industries, is home to several world-class universities and a thriving community of businesses – strengths that need to be harness and leveraged. But it also has high levels of deprivation, with homelessness reaching a record high and nearly half a million people living in very deep poverty last year. Scotland won’t be truly thriving unless it finds ways to ensure that all its inhabitants benefit from growth and investment. This is the central challenge facing policy makers both in Holyrood and Westminster.
What should a new national economic strategy for Scotland include? What would the pursuit of stronger economic growth mean for local, national and UK-wide policy makers? How will economic change affect the jobs we do, the places we live and the businesses we work for? And what are the prospects for cities like Glasgow, and nations like Scotland, in rising to these challenges?
Tdasx: Interpreting the 2024 Cryptocurrency Market Funding Trends and Technol...
Duke Energy 1Q2004_ER
1. April 29, 2004 MEDIA CONTACT: Randy Wheeless
Phone: 704/382-8379
24-Hour: 704/382-8333
ANALYST CONTACT: Greg Ebel
Phone: 704/382-8118
DUKE ENERGY REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2004 RESULTS
• Ongoing first quarter earnings per share (EPS) of 32 cents versus
42 cents in previous year; reported EPS of 36 cents versus 25 cents in
prior year’s quarter
• Company expects to exceed full-year asset sales and cash flow targets;
debt reduction ahead of schedule
• Proceeds from announced asset sales year-to-date to generate
approximately $1.5 billion
• Field Services posts more than 200-percent increase in EBIT from
continuing operations
• Franchised Electric and Natural Gas Transmission continue to post
solid earnings and cash flow
• DENA results affected by mark-to-market loss of 6 cents per share
CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Duke Energy reported net income in the first quarter of 2004
of $334 million, or $0.36 per share, compared to net income of $225 million, or
$0.25 per share in the first quarter of 2003.
Ongoing earnings per share (EPS) for the first quarter of 2004, which excludes
special items, was $0.32 versus $0.42 for the comparable quarter.
quot;We have made exceptional progress in executing our 2004 business and financial
plan. By closing the sale of our Australian assets, we have already met our asset
sales target of $1.5 billion for 2004,” said Paul Anderson, Duke Energy chairman of
2. the board and chief executive officer. quot;Overall, ongoing earnings were in line with
our expectations except for DENA, which was affected by mark-to-market losses.
Thanks to our asset sales and continued solid earnings and cash flow from our
franchised electric and natural gas pipeline businesses, Duke Energy's financial
strength and flexibility are rapidly improving. As a result, our key businesses are
positioned to selectively pursue growth opportunities.quot;
Special items for the quarter include:
2004 2003
Pre-Tax Tax EPS EPS
($ in Millions) Amount Effect Impact Impact
First Quarter
• Gain on sale of Australian assets $256 ($18) $0.26 --
• Net loss on sale of DENA assets, primarily anticipated (322) 119 (0.22) --
sale of southeast U.S. plants
• Gains on sale of other assets, including Caribbean 14 (5) 0.01 --
Nitrogen Co.
• Charge related to planned sale of Cantarell investment (13) 5 (0.01) --
First quarter 2003
• 2003 gain on asset sales 16 (5) -- $0.01
• 2003 change in accounting principles (256) 94 -- ($0.18)
TOTAL EPS IMPACT $0.04 ($0.17)
EPS, as reported $0.36 $0.25
EPS, ongoing $0.32 $0.42
BUSINESS UNIT RESULTS
Franchised Electric
First quarter 2004 earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) from Duke Power
totaled $424 million, compared to the first quarter of 2003 EBIT of $454 million. The
decrease for the quarter was driven primarily by reduced wholesale power sales
and additional costs for planned nuclear outages compared to the previous year’s
quarter. Storm repair costs were lower during the quarter than in the prior year’s
quarter. Storm damages, most notably a wind storm in early March 2004 in
North Carolina, cost $11 million, compared to last year’s first quarter ice storm costs
of $35 million.
2
3. Favorable weather pushed residential sales up 3.4 percent during the quarter while
industrial sales continued to decrease – down 4 percent from last year’s quarter. As
part of Duke Power’s 100th anniversary of service, the utility has put a renewed
emphasis on economic development in North Carolina and South Carolina to
increase commercial and industrial sales.
Natural Gas Transmission
Duke Energy Gas Transmission (DEGT) reported first quarter 2004 EBIT of
$398 million compared to $423 million in the prior year’s quarter. The decrease is
primarily a result of gains of $16 million from asset sales recorded in the prior year’s
quarter, and foregone earnings of $17 million in this year’s quarter from various
assets sold during 2003. Excluding these amounts related to assets sold, EBIT
increased $8 million as a result of contributions from U.S. business expansions and
foreign exchange impacts from the strengthening Canadian currency. This was
partly offset by warmer weather affecting Union Gas, the Canadian gas distribution
business, and project development costs capitalized in the prior year’s period.
The favorable Canadian currency impacts on DEGT’s EBIT were partially offset in
Duke Energy’s net income by currency impacts on Canadian interest, taxes and
other hedging strategies.
Field Services
The Field Services business segment, which represents Duke Energy's 70-percent
interest in Duke Energy Field Services (DEFS), reported first quarter 2004 EBIT of
$92 million from continuing operations, compared to $30 million in the first quarter of
2003. The more than 200-percent increase was primarily due to the favorable effects
of commodity prices, net of hedging, compared to last year’s quarter and improved
results from trading and marketing activities.
During the first quarter of 2004, DEFS declared and paid a $50 million dividend, of
which $35 million was paid to Duke Energy.
3
4. Duke Energy North America
Duke Energy North America (DENA) reported an EBIT loss of $521 million in the
first quarter of 2004, compared to EBIT of $23 million in the prior year’s quarter.
The most significant factors in the loss were: 1) an additional $325 million non-cash
loss associated with the anticipated sale of DENA’s southeast U.S. plants, and 2) a
mark-to-market loss of $93 million, $87 million after minority interest, taken during
the quarter as a result of changes in power and gas prices.
Excluding the net loss on the sale of assets and mark-to-market changes, DENA’s
first quarter 2004 EBIT loss would have been $106 million.
International Energy
For the first quarter of 2004, Duke Energy International (DEI) reported EBIT from
continuing operations of $29 million, compared to $40 million in the first quarter of
2003. During the quarter, DEI recorded a $13 million non-cash charge to EBIT from
continuing operations associated with its intention to sell its ownership share of
Cantarell, a nitrogen-production plant in Mexico.
Crescent Resources
Crescent Resources, Duke Energy’s affiliated real estate company, is now reporting
earnings as a separate segment. Crescent reported first quarter 2004 EBIT from
continuing operations of $60 million versus a break-even first quarter 2003, due to
increased land and commercial sales.
Other
Other, including DukeNet Communications, Duke/Fluor Daniel, Duke Energy
Merchants, Energy Delivery Services and corporate costs, reported an EBIT loss of
$5 million in the first quarter of 2004, compared to an EBIT loss of $48 million in the
first quarter of 2003. This improvement is primarily a result of charges taken in 2003
related to exiting proprietary trading at Duke Energy Merchants and the 2004 gain
on the sale of Caribbean Nitrogen Co.
4
5. Discontinued Operations
At the end of 2003, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
Duke Energy re-classified the results for certain operations to a separate line on the
statement of operations called “Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations.” The
amounts reported as discontinued operations are reported net of tax. The business
units affected by this reclassification are International Energy, Field Services and
Other. All reported periods have been restated.
Discontinued Operations generated first quarter 2004 results of $246 million,
compared to a first quarter 2003 loss of $5 million, as a result of a $238 million gain,
net of tax, on the sale of the Australian assets.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $356 million for the first quarter of 2004, compared to
$326 million for the first quarter of 2003. Interest increased primarily due to lower
capitalized interest of $14 million, $16 million of interest associated with the re-
classification of certain trust preferred securities from minority interest to long-term
debt, an $11 million charge related to the re-marketing costs associated with the
equity units at Duke Capital and $9 million associated with the Canadian exchange
rate. These increases were offset by a $20 million decrease from net debt reduction,
refinancing activities and lower interest cost in Brazil.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Duke Energy's consolidated capital structure at the end of first quarter 2004,
including short-term debt, was 58 percent debt, 37 percent common equity and
5 percent minority interests.
Under various credit facilities, Duke Energy, Duke Capital and other subsidiaries
had the ability to borrow up to $3.3 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2004. The
5
6. companies had borrowings and letters of credit outstanding under these programs
of approximately $1.4 billion as of the end of the first quarter of 2004, resulting in
unused capacity of approximately $1.9 billion. The company also had approximately
$1.5 billion in cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the first quarter of 2004.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information, including EPS reconciliation data and a schedule for Duke
Energy Field Services gas volume and margin by contract type, can be obtained at
Duke Energy’s first quarter 2004 earnings information Web site at:
http://www.duke-energy.com/investors/financial/latest/default.asp.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The primary performance measure used by management to evaluate segment
performance is EBIT from continuing operations, which at the segment level
represents all profits from continuing operations (both operating and non-operating)
before deducting interest and taxes, and is net of the minority interest expense
related to those profits. Management believes EBIT from continuing operations is a
good indicator of each segment’s operating performance as it represents the results
of our ownership interests in continuing operations without regard to financing
methods or capital structures.
EBIT from continuing operations should not be considered an alternative to, or more
meaningful than, net income, income from continuing operations, operating income
or cash flow as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). Duke Energy’s EBIT from continuing operations may not be
comparable to a similarly titled measure of another company.
Duke Energy’s management uses ongoing EPS, which represents net income
adjusted for special items, as one of the measures to evaluate operations of the
company. Special items represent certain charges which management believes will
6
7. not be recurring on a regular basis. Management believes that the presentation of
ongoing EPS provides useful information to investors, as it allows them to more
accurately compare the company’s ongoing performance across all periods.
Duke Energy is a diversified energy company with a portfolio of natural gas and
electric businesses, both regulated and unregulated, and an affiliated real estate
company. Duke Energy supplies, delivers and processes energy for customers in
North America and selected international markets. In 2004, the company celebrates
a century of service with the 100th anniversary of its electric utility Duke Power.
Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Duke Energy is a Fortune 500 company traded on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DUK. More information about the
company is available on the Internet at: www.duke-energy.com.
An earnings conference call for analysts is scheduled for 10 a.m. ET today. The
conference call can be accessed via the investors' section of Duke Energy's Web
site http://www.duke-energy.com/investors/financial/latest/default.asp or by dialing
800/946-0742 in the United States or 719/457-2650 outside the United States. The
confirmation code is 598456. Please call in five to 10 minutes prior to the scheduled
start time. A replay of the conference call will be available by dialing 888/203-1112
with a confirmation code of 598456. The international replay number is 719/457-
0820, confirmation code 598456. A replay and transcript also will be available by
accessing the investors' section of the company’s Web site http://www.duke-
energy.com/investors/financial/latest/default.asp. The presentation may include
certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined under SEC rules. In such event, a
reconciliation of those measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures
will be available on our investor relations Web site at: http://www.duke-
energy.com/investors/financial/gaap/default.asp.
This document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Although Duke Energy believes that its expectations are based on reasonable
assumptions, it can give no assurance that its goals will be achieved. Important
7
8. factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-
looking statements herein are discussed in Duke Energy’s filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
###
8
9. MARCH 2004
QUARTERLY HIGHLIGHTS
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(In millions, except where noted) 2004 2003
COMMON STOCK DATA
Earnings Per Share (from continuing operations)
Basic $ 0.09 $ 0.43
Diluted $ 0.09 $ 0.43
Earnings Per Share (from discontinued operations)
Basic $ 0.27 $ -
Diluted $ 0.27 $ -
Earnings Per Share (before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle)
Basic $ 0.36 $ 0.43
Diluted $ 0.36 $ 0.43
Earnings Per Share
Basic $ 0.36 $ 0.25
Diluted $ 0.36 $ 0.25
Dividends Per Share $ 0.275 $ 0.275
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
Basic 912 897
Diluted 915 897
INCOME
Operating Revenues $ 5,845 $ 6,172
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) 528 963
Interest Expense (a) 356 326
Minority Interest Expense (a) 38 50
Income Tax Expense 46 195
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations 246 (5)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle, net of tax and minority interest - (162)
Net Income 334 225
Dividends and Premiums on Redemptions of Preferred and Preference Stock 2 3
Earnings Available for Common Stockholders $ 332 $ 222
CAPITALIZATION
Common Equity 37% 37%
Preferred Stock 0% 1%
Trust Preferred Securities 0% 3%
Total Common Equity and Preferred Securities 37% 41%
Minority Interests 5% 4%
Total Debt 58% 55%
Total Debt $ 21,798 $ 22,357
Book Value Per Share $ 15.32 $ 16.99
Actual Shares Outstanding 914 900
CAPITAL AND INVESTMENT EXPENDITURES
Franchised Electric $ 262 $ 258
Natural Gas Transmission 154 216
Field Services 25 31
Duke Energy North America 9 160
International Energy 8 25
Crescent (b) 162 54
Other - 61
Total Capital and Investment Expenditures $ 620 $ 805
EBIT BY BUSINESS SEGMENT
Franchised Electric $ 424 $ 454
Natural Gas Transmission 398 423
Field Services 92 30
Duke Energy North America (521) 23
International Energy 29 40
Crescent (b) 60 -
Other (5) (48)
Total Segment and Other EBIT 477 922
EBIT Attributable to:
Minority Interest Expense 50 43
Third Party Interest Income 7 2
Foreign Currency Remeasurement Loss (5) (4)
Intercompany EBIT Elimination (c) (1) -
Total EBIT $ 528 $ 963
(a) Minority interest includes financing expenses related to securities of subsidiaries of $27 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2003. The expense related to these securities is accounted for in interest expense in 2004.
(b) Beginning in 2004, Crescent, formerly part of Other, is considered a reportable segment.
(c) Amount relates to the elimination of intercompany EBIT that has been reclassified to discontinued operations.
9
10. MARCH 2004
QUARTERLY HIGHLIGHTS
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(In millions, except where noted) 2004 2003
FRANCHISED ELECTRIC
Operating Revenues $ 1,271 $ 1,251
Operating Expenses 851 813
Other Income, net of expenses 4 16
EBIT $ 424 $ 454
Sales, GWh 21,963 22,043
NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION
Operating Revenues $ 1,038 $ 968
Operating Expenses 638 567
Other Income, net of expenses (e) 6 35
Minority Interest Expense 8 13
EBIT $ 398 $ 423
Proportional Throughput, TBtu 1,089 1,082
FIELD SERVICES (d)
Operating Revenues $ 2,375 $ 2,550
Operating Expenses 2,249 2,509
Other Income, net of expenses 18 15
Minority Interest Expense 52 26
EBIT $ 92 $ 30
Natural Gas Gathered and Processed/Transported, TBtu/day 7.3 7.7
Natural Gas Liquids Production, MBbl/d 356.7 367.9
Average Natural Gas Price per MMBtu $ 5.69 $ 6.59
Average Natural Gas Liquids Price per Gallon $ 0.59 $ 0.58
DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA
Operating Revenues $ 656 $ 1,396
Operating Expenses 865 1,382
Loss on Sales of Other Assets, net (a) (322) -
Other Income, net of expenses (4) 9
Minority Interest Benefit (14) -
EBIT $ (521) $ 23
Actual Plant Production, GWh (c) 5,461 5,110
Proportional MW Capacity in Operation 15,821 14,156
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY (d)
Operating Revenues $ 154 $ 172
Operating Expenses 131 135
Other Income, net of expenses 9 7
Minority Interest Expense 3 4
EBIT $ 29 $ 40
Sales, GWh 4,564 3,969
Proportional MW Capacity in Operation 4,121 4,013
CRESCENT (d)
Operating Revenues $ 195 $ 23
Operating Expenses 134 23
Minority Interest Expense 1 -
EBIT $ 60 $ -
Residential Developed Lot Sales $ 32 $ 14
Commercial Project Sales $ 116 $ -
Real Estate Land Sales $ 1 $ 2
Land Management Land Sales $ 39 $ 2
OTHER (d)
Operating Revenues $ 344 $ 517
Operating Expenses 387 582
Gains on Sales of Other Assets, net (b) 14 -
Other Income, net of expenses 24 17
EBIT $ (5) $ (48)
(a) Amount includes DENA Southeast plant impairment of $325 million and gain on sale of Duke Energy Trading & Marketing contracts.
(b) Primarily represents Duke Energy Merchant's gain on sale of interest in Carribean Nitrogen Company
(c) Represents 100% of GWh.
(d) Prior year amounts have been reclassified due to discontinued operations.
(e) Prior year includes gain on sale of limited partnership interests in Northern Border Capital L.P. of $14 million.
10
11. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per-share amounts)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2004 2003
Operating Revenues
Non-regulated electric, natural gas, natural gas liquids, and other $ 3,612 $ 4,014
Regulated electric 1,251 1,279
Regulated natural gas 982 879
Total operating revenues 5,845 6,172
Operating Expenses
Natural gas and petroleum products purchased 3,032 3,492
Operation and maintenance 882 674
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power 564 548
Depreciation and amortization 436 431
Property and other taxes 154 140
Total operating expenses 5,068 5,285
(Losses) Gains on Sales of Other Assets, net (308) 2
Operating Income 469 889
Other Income and Expenses
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates 34 34
Gains on sales of equity investments - 14
Other income and expenses, net 25 26
Total other income and expenses 59 74
Interest Expense 356 326
Minority Interest Expense 38 50
Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes 134 587
Income Tax Expense from Continuing Operations 46 195
Income From Continuing Operations 88 392
Discontinued Operations
Net operating income, net of tax 7 3
Net income (loss) on dispositions, net of tax 239 (8)
Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations 246 (5)
Income Before Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle 334 387
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle, net of tax and minority interest - (162)
Net Income 334 225
Dividends and Premiums on Redemption of Preferred and Preference Stock 2 3
Earnings Available For Common Stockholders $ 332 $ 222
Common Stock Data
Weighted-average shares outstanding
Basic 912 897
Diluted 915 897
Earnings per share (from continuing operations)
Basic $ 0.09 $ 0.43
Diluted $ 0.09 $ 0.43
Earnings per share (from discontinued operations)
Basic $ 0.27 $ -
Diluted $ 0.27 $ -
Earnings per share (before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle)
Basic $ 0.36 $ 0.43
Diluted $ 0.36 $ 0.43
Earnings per share
Basic $ 0.36 $ 0.25
Diluted $ 0.36 $ 0.25
Dividends per share $ 0.275 $ 0.275
11
12. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,500 $ 1,160
Receivables 2,689 2,888
Inventory 878 1,156
Assets held for sale 297 424
Unrealized gains on mark-to-market and hedging transactions 1,320 1,566
Other 1,056 694
Total current assets 7,740 7,888
Investments and Other Assets
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates 1,365 1,398
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds 960 925
Goodwill 3,932 3,962
Notes receivable 232 260
Unrealized gains on mark-to-market and hedging transactions 1,635 1,857
Assets held for sale 2,119 1,444
Other 887 1,117
Total investments and other assets 11,130 10,963
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost 46,719 47,157
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 12,641 12,171
Net property, plant and equipment 34,078 34,986
Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits
Deferred debt expense 326 275
Regulatory assets related to income taxes 1,194 1,152
Other 913 939
Total regulatory assets and deferred debits 2,433 2,366
Total Assets $ 55,381 $ 56,203
12
13. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
LIABILITIES AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 2,000 $ 2,317
Notes payable and commercial paper 275 130
Taxes accrued 293 14
Interest accrued 305 304
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale 883 651
Current maturities of long-term debt 1,489 1,200
Unrealized losses on mark-to-market and hedging transactions 993 1,283
Other 1,396 1,799
Total current liabilities 7,634 7,698
Long-term Debt, including debt to affiliates of $516 at March 31, 2004 and
$876 at December 31, 2003 20,034 20,622
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities
Deferred income taxes 4,290 4,120
Investment tax credit 162 165
Unrealized losses on mark-to-market and hedging transactions 1,556 1,754
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale 305 737
Other 5,541 5,524
Total deferred credits and other liabilities 11,854 12,300
Commitments and Contingencies
Minority Interests 1,723 1,701
Preferred and preference stock without sinking fund requirements 134 134
Common Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, no par, 2 billion shares authorized; 914 million and 911 million
shares outstanding at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively 9,598 9,519
Retained earnings 4,145 4,060
Accumulated other comprehensive income 259 169
Total common stockholders' equity 14,002 13,748
Total Liabilities and Common Stockholders' Equity $ 55,381 $ 56,203
13
14. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2004 2003
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $ 334 $ 225
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of nuclear fuel) 476 484
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - 162
Net losses (gains) on sales of equity investments and other assets 50 (4)
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions 221 (116)
Changes in working capital and other 225 753
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,306 1,504
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital and investment expenditures, net of refund (620) (805)
Net proceeds from the sales of equity investment and other assets,
and sales of and collections on notes receivable 166 306
Other (5) 24
Net cash used in investing activities (459) (475)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the
Issuance of long-term debt 72 824
Issuance of common stock and common stock
related to employee benefit plans 59 80
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt, and
net paydown of commercial paper and notes payable (288) (1,189)
Dividends paid (265) (258)
Other (54) (234)
Net cash used in financing activities (476) (777)
Changes in cash and cash equivalents associated with assets held for sale (31) -
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 340 252
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,160 857
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 1,500 $ 1,109
14
15. Supplemental Disclosures
Quarter Ended March 31, 2004
Duke Energy Corporation
1Q04
$ (264)
Mark-to-market Portfolio (in millions)
Daily Value at Risk (DvaR) (in millions)
95% Confidence Level, One-Day Holding Period, Two-Tailed
$ 23
Average for the Period
Duke Energy North America
(in millions unless stated otherwise) Q-T-D March 31, 2004
Proprietary Structured Owned
Merchant Energy Gross Margin Trading Contracts Assets Total
Mark-to-market gross margin (loss) $ 3 $ (95) $ (1) $ (93)
Accrual gross margin (loss) n/a (11) 65 54
Total Gross Margin $ 3 $ (106) $ 64 (39)
Reconciliation to Segment EBIT:
Plant depreciation (47)
Plant operating and maintenance expenses (79)
General and administrative and other expenses (48)
Minority interest 14
Gain (loss) on sale of other assets (322)
$ (521)
DENA Segment EBIT
Owned Assets - Merchant Plant Production
2004b
and Hedging Information a 2005 2006
Estimated available production (millions of MWh) 48 64 64
Combined cycle 42 56 56
Peaker units 6 8 8
Estimated production (millions of MWh) 15 24 27
Combined cycle 15 23 26
Peaker units - 1 1
Hedges
Estimated production sold 95% 70% 63%
$ 46 $ 45 $ 42
Average price sold ($/MWh)
a
All figures exclude Southeast plants.
b
Information for 2004 is for the remainder of the year only (April - December).
15
16. Supplemental Disclosures
Quarter Ended March 31, 2004
Duke Energy North America (continued)
(in millions)
Maturity/Source of Carrying Value of Over Total
Energy Contract Net Assets 2004 2005 2006 2007 4 Years Fair Value
Proprietary Trading
Actively quoted prices and other external sources $ 109 $ 6 $ 28 $ (9) $ (19) $ 115
Modeled (4) 13 8 7 10 34
$ 105 $ 19 $ 36 $ (2) $ (9) $ 149
Structured Contracts
Actively quoted prices and other external sources $ 47 $ 36 $ (70) $ (62) $ (87) $ (136)
Modeled (48) (22) (31) (7) (23) (131)
$ (1) $ 14 $ (101) $ (69) $ (110) $ (267)
Owned Assets
Actively quoted prices and other external sources $ 260 $ 213 $ 149 $ 74 $ 53 $ 749
Modeled - - - - 21 21
$ 260 $ 213 $ 149 $ 74 $ 74 $ 770
$ 652
Total Fair Value of Energy Contract Net Assets *
* Total Carrying Value of Energy Contract Net Assets represents the combination of amounts presented as assets and
(liabilities) related to unrealized gains or losses on mark-to-market and hedging transactions for Duke Energy North
America.
Terms of Reference
Estimated Available Production
Represents the amount of electric power capable of being generated from owned merchant assets, after adjusting for
scheduled maintenance and outage factors. For simple cycle facilities, only peak demand periods were included in this
calculation.
Estimated Production
Represents the amount of power expected to be sold in a future period. This figure is based on economic projections
modeled by Duke Energy personnel.
Estimated Production Sold
Represents the portion of estimated production which has been hedged, primarily through firm physical contracts.
Owned Assets
Represents activity around energy assets owned or leased, including hedges of power sales and fuel purchase
requirements and tolls, transmission, transportations and storage contracts that hedge owned assets. Normal purchases
and sales associated with such assets are included in the Merchant Energy Gross Margin table, yet excluded from the
Maturity/Sources of Fair Value of Energy Contract Net Assets table. Economic hedges of Owned Assets that do not meet
hedge accounting standards will still be classified as Owned Assets in the Merchant Energy Gross Margin table.
Proprietary Trading
Standardized contracts entered into to take a market view, capture market price changes or put capital at risk.
Structured Contracts
Non-standard contracts not associated with owned or leased assets and involving significant tailoring of terms to meet
customer needs, and associated hedges. This category includes tolls, transmission contracts, transportation contracts
and storage contracts, except those that hedge Owned Assets. Economic hedges of Structured Contracts that do not
meet hedge accounting standards will still be classified as Structured Contracts in the Merchant Energy Gross Margin table.
16