This study analyzed prescription dosages of oral anti-cancer agents (OAs) compared to FDA recommendations among 155 cancer patients. The sample was predominantly Caucasian (86%) and male (43%), with a mean age of 59.3 years. Most patients (66%) had stage IV cancer. The study found that the prescribed dosage equaled the FDA recommendation for 56% of patients, exceeded the recommendation for 19%, and was lower than the recommendation for 25%. For the drug Capecitabine, the prescribed dosage equaled the FDA level for only 5% of patients, exceeded it for 55%, and was lower for 40%. The implications are that nurses should be aware of proper OA dosages to avoid increased side effects
Journal Club presentation on Outbreak Investigation Study Kunal Modak
The following presentation is based on: Concurrent Multiple Outbreaks of Varicella, Rubeola,
German Measles Outbreak in Unvaccinated Children of
Co-Educational Mount Carmel Senior Secondary School,
Thakurdwara Palampur of Northern Himachal, India
Multidisciplinary Approach to Prostate Cancer and Changes in Treatment Decisi...CrimsonpublishersCancer
In order to demonstrate the impact of multi-disciplinary care in the community oncology setting, we evaluated treatment decisions following the initiation of a dedicated genitourinary multi-disciplinary clinic (GUMDC).
Journal Club presentation on Outbreak Investigation Study Kunal Modak
The following presentation is based on: Concurrent Multiple Outbreaks of Varicella, Rubeola,
German Measles Outbreak in Unvaccinated Children of
Co-Educational Mount Carmel Senior Secondary School,
Thakurdwara Palampur of Northern Himachal, India
Multidisciplinary Approach to Prostate Cancer and Changes in Treatment Decisi...CrimsonpublishersCancer
In order to demonstrate the impact of multi-disciplinary care in the community oncology setting, we evaluated treatment decisions following the initiation of a dedicated genitourinary multi-disciplinary clinic (GUMDC).
Research on consequences of cancer and its treatment on quality of life, symp...Nata Chalanskaya
Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Group Head, consultant, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, presentation at the Second International Scientific and Practical Conference «Improving the quality of life of cancer patients through the development of cooperation between state, commercial and non-profit organizations». 2018-01-23, Minsk. Belarus.
How We Do Harm: A Webinar by SHARE with Dr. Otis Brawleybkling
Dr. Otis Brawley, author of How We Do Harm, pulls back the curtain on how health care is really practiced in American. Hosted by SHARE: Self-help for Women with Breast or Ovarian Cancer.. www.sharecancersupport.org. If you would like to watch the full webinar, visit www.sharecancersupport.org/brawley.
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershmanbkling
Dr. Dawn L. Hershman of the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University presented the basics of clinical trials and emphasized how important it is for more patients to participate in them. She also discussed trials currently available for early stage and metastatic breast cancers. The webinar was presented on June 25, 2014. To hear the webinar, visit www.sharecancersupport.org/hershman
Communicating hope and truth: A presentation for health care professionalsbkling
Dr. Don S. Dizon, gynecologic oncologist at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, discusses the lessons he's learned while trying to communicate in an honest and hopeful way with patients facing a difficult diagnosis. This was presented as a webinar hosted by SHARE. If you'd like to view the complete webinar, go to www.sharecancersupport.org/dizon
Research on consequences of cancer and its treatment on quality of life, symp...Nata Chalanskaya
Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Group Head, consultant, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, presentation at the Second International Scientific and Practical Conference «Improving the quality of life of cancer patients through the development of cooperation between state, commercial and non-profit organizations». 2018-01-23, Minsk. Belarus.
How We Do Harm: A Webinar by SHARE with Dr. Otis Brawleybkling
Dr. Otis Brawley, author of How We Do Harm, pulls back the curtain on how health care is really practiced in American. Hosted by SHARE: Self-help for Women with Breast or Ovarian Cancer.. www.sharecancersupport.org. If you would like to watch the full webinar, visit www.sharecancersupport.org/brawley.
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershmanbkling
Dr. Dawn L. Hershman of the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University presented the basics of clinical trials and emphasized how important it is for more patients to participate in them. She also discussed trials currently available for early stage and metastatic breast cancers. The webinar was presented on June 25, 2014. To hear the webinar, visit www.sharecancersupport.org/hershman
Communicating hope and truth: A presentation for health care professionalsbkling
Dr. Don S. Dizon, gynecologic oncologist at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, discusses the lessons he's learned while trying to communicate in an honest and hopeful way with patients facing a difficult diagnosis. This was presented as a webinar hosted by SHARE. If you'd like to view the complete webinar, go to www.sharecancersupport.org/dizon
Past nonmedical opioid use could predict future heroin use among teensΔρ. Γιώργος K. Κασάπης
Two studies published yesterday point to predictors of teens using drugs. Researchers in one study found that teens who used opioids when they were not prescribed for medical reasons were more likely to later use heroin. Of the nearly 3,300 high schoolers who were included in the study, those who previously used opioids were about 11% more likely to use heroin, while those who currently used opioids were about 13% more likely to use heroin.
Another study found that there was no increase in teenagers using marijuana if they lived in a state that had laws legalizing the drug. In fact, in states with recreational marijuana laws, the odds of teen marijuana use were about 10% less following legalization.
PUBH6005: Epidemiology
Assignment- 3
Critical Appraisal Essay
Title: To find the association between use of tobacco and alcohol and head and
neck/ Oral Cancer in South East Asia.
Name of student: Rajwant Kaur
Student ID: 00275380T
Name of topic co-ordinator: Dr. Bhawna Gupta
Topic: PUBH6005: Epidemiology
Introduction
The major risk factors for head and neck cancers are tobacco and alcohol consumption. Smoking
and alcohol are independent risk factor for head and neck cancer. Tobacco use can be chewing
tobacco, snuff and smoking tobacco. At least 75% of head and neck cancers are caused by
tobacco and alcohol use (NIH 2017). In developing countries like Southeast Asia, tobacco is used
in many forms along with alcohol consumptions. Areca nuts and betel leaf with or without
tobacco also cause cancers Other factors also increase the vulnerability of people for cancers
such as low education, low family income, poor oral hygiene and environment (Priebe et al.,
2008).
Awareness is virtually non-existence in the developing countries of Southeast Asia and therefore
people with rising affluence tend to buy more of tobacco products and thus increase their risks
for cancer. To prevent the cancers, the health organizations and health professionals should
focus on educating the people through various means to quit habits of tobacco use and alcohol
consumption. Regular screening is also important to detect the cancer at early stage (Priebe et
al., 2008).
Methodology
Method:
Three selected papers were evaluated and explained by NHMRC form, in which level of evidence,
bias, confounding factors and chances, clinical impacts, applicability are defined. CASP
framework with checklist that can explain or support in analyzing and justifying the questions
and characteristics.
Search strategy:
Before commencing critical appraisal of studies, I did systematic review on our research question
about identifying the association between use of tobacco and alcohol and head and neck/ Oral
Cancer in South East Asia. Systematic reviews apply strategies for eliminating biases and random
errors. They adhere to a scientific design for offering reliable, reproducible and defensible
conclusions. The evidences use more rigorous methodology /designs that minimize bias.
Systematic reviews incorporate results of multiple studies (Guide, 2018).
The literature search covered the studies applying alternative terminologies, like the terms sed
for education on cancer include Recommendation, Internet-based intervention on cancer,
teletherapy, etc.
Databases:
The databases used in the research include (1) Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews), (2) CINAHL Plus with full text (3) MEDLINE via PubMed (4) EBSCOhost, (5)
Ovid, and (6) ProQuest. I searched 105 studies, out of which three studies are selected, which are
identifies as the most compatible with the rese ...
PUBH6005: Epidemiology
Assignment- 3
Critical Appraisal Essay
Title: To find the association between use of tobacco and alcohol and head and
neck/ Oral Cancer in South East Asia.
Name of student: Rajwant Kaur
Student ID: 00275380T
Name of topic co-ordinator: Dr. Bhawna Gupta
Topic: PUBH6005: Epidemiology
Introduction
The major risk factors for head and neck cancers are tobacco and alcohol consumption. Smoking
and alcohol are independent risk factor for head and neck cancer. Tobacco use can be chewing
tobacco, snuff and smoking tobacco. At least 75% of head and neck cancers are caused by
tobacco and alcohol use (NIH 2017). In developing countries like Southeast Asia, tobacco is used
in many forms along with alcohol consumptions. Areca nuts and betel leaf with or without
tobacco also cause cancers Other factors also increase the vulnerability of people for cancers
such as low education, low family income, poor oral hygiene and environment (Priebe et al.,
2008).
Awareness is virtually non-existence in the developing countries of Southeast Asia and therefore
people with rising affluence tend to buy more of tobacco products and thus increase their risks
for cancer. To prevent the cancers, the health organizations and health professionals should
focus on educating the people through various means to quit habits of tobacco use and alcohol
consumption. Regular screening is also important to detect the cancer at early stage (Priebe et
al., 2008).
Methodology
Method:
Three selected papers were evaluated and explained by NHMRC form, in which level of evidence,
bias, confounding factors and chances, clinical impacts, applicability are defined. CASP
framework with checklist that can explain or support in analyzing and justifying the questions
and characteristics.
Search strategy:
Before commencing critical appraisal of studies, I did systematic review on our research question
about identifying the association between use of tobacco and alcohol and head and neck/ Oral
Cancer in South East Asia. Systematic reviews apply strategies for eliminating biases and random
errors. They adhere to a scientific design for offering reliable, reproducible and defensible
conclusions. The evidences use more rigorous methodology /designs that minimize bias.
Systematic reviews incorporate results of multiple studies (Guide, 2018).
The literature search covered the studies applying alternative terminologies, like the terms sed
for education on cancer include Recommendation, Internet-based intervention on cancer,
teletherapy, etc.
Databases:
The databases used in the research include (1) Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews), (2) CINAHL Plus with full text (3) MEDLINE via PubMed (4) EBSCOhost, (5)
Ovid, and (6) ProQuest. I searched 105 studies, out of which three studies are selected, which are
identifies as the most compatible with the rese ...
Carle Palliative Care Journal Club 1/15/2020Mike Aref
A journal club review and criticism of J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Dec 17. pii: djz233. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz233 Emergency Department Visits for Opioid Overdoses Among Patients with Cancer by Jairam V, Yang DX, Yu JB, Park HS.
2006 presentation at The European Health Psychology Conference in Bath: Can We Bury the Idea That Psychotherapy Extends the survival of Cancer Patients?
1. Sample Characteristics
N=155
Age 59.3 mean; standard
deviation (SD) 10.32;
Range 33-82 years
Gender Male: n=66 (43%)
Female: n=89 (57%)
Race Caucasian: n=133 (86%)
African-American: n=16
(10%)
Other, multi-racial, or not
reported: n=6 (4%)
Cancer
Stage
Of 110 who reported
n=72 (66%) Stage IV
Secondary Analysis of Oral Anti-cancer Agent
Prescription Dosages and FDA Recommendations
S. Doane, Honors College Professorial Assistant; M. Schueller, BA; & S. Spoelstra, PhD, RN
Significance & Purpose
• The use of oral anti-cancer
agents (OAs) is increasing,
and therapeutic doses are
needed for effective
treatment.
• This study compared actual
prescribed OA dosages to
corresponding FDA
recommended OA dosages
among cancer patients
prescribed treatment in oral
form.
Data Analysis
• Data on demographics and
OA prescriptions were
collected and compiled from
baseline interviews.
• Dosage recommendation
data were taken from the
FDA website. For this
analysis, dosages were
measured in total dosage
per 24 hour time period.
• Prescription dosages were
compared with FDA
recommendations.
Methodology
• This is a secondary analysis
of data from two randomized
controlled trails on text
messaging to promote OA
adherence.
• Inclusion criteria were: >21
years of age; diagnosed with
cancer; and prescribed an OA
for treatment.
• 155 patients were included.
Implications for
Practice
• Nurses should be aware of
FDA recommended dosages
for patients prescribed OAs
under their treatment
• Patients receiving dosages
that exceed the FDA
recommended may
experience increased side
effects and adverse events.
Prescription Data
28 Different OAs Prescribed
= FDA recommended n=86 (56%)
> FDA recommended n=30 (19%)
< FDA recommended n=39 (25%)
Capecitabine
35.5% (n=55) of patients
= FDA recommended n=3 (5%)
> FDA recommended n=30 (55%)
< FDA recommended n=22 (40%)
This research was supported by one grant from the McKesson Foundation, (San Francisco, California) entitled: Text Messaging to Improve Symptom Management and Adherence to Oral
Chemotherapy Agents.; and a grant from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) R15 award entitled: Text Messaging to Improve Adherence to Oral Chemotherapy Agents.
Editor's Notes
1. The use of oral anti-cancer agents (OAs) is increasing, moving cancer treatment plans responsibility to patients’ homes.
2. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to compare actual prescribed OA dosages to corresponding FDA recommended OA dosages among cancer patients prescribed treatment in oral form.
3. I made a few order/format changes to the Sample Characteristics table
4. Not absolutely necessary to switch, but generally data is represented in this order– Male n=66 (42.6%)
5. Since all authors are affiliated with CON, don’t need the superscript
6. Might want to think about/be prepared to answer these questions (people will likely ask questions…) a) Why did you choose to make Capecitabine singled out? b) Any ideas why Capecitabine rarely is prescribed the recommended dose? c) What are some conclusions you have drawn from this analysis? d) did the TM intervention work to promote adherence?
Good overall organization/presentation!