Downloaded 10 times
More Related Content
Similar to Dharavi Presentation.ppt
Dharavi Presentation.ppt
- 1.
- 2. DHARAVI & THEGROWING CITY : COLONIAL CORE ORIGINAL LIMITS INDIGENEOUS CORE EXTENDED CITY 1970s SUBURBAN SPRAWLS INDUSTRIAL CORE COLONIAL SUBURBS 1950s DHARAVI KAMLA RAHEJA VIDYANIDHI INSTITUTE FOR ARCHITECTURE DHARAVI HAS MOVED FROM BEING THE PERIPHERY OF MUMBAI TO ITS CENTER
- 3. KAMLA RAHEJA VIDYANIDHIINSTITUTE FOR ARCHITECTURE MAJOR ROADS & RAILWAY LINES :
- 4. DHARAVI TIMELINE : 17001900 2000 1737 Kala Killa Koliwada 1812 Reclaiming Swamp Kumbharwada PMGP 1971 Maharashtra Slum Areas Improvement, Clearance & Redevelopment Act 1800 1930 1987 SPARC 2004 SRA 1995 SPPL 1993 Riots 1985 Illegal Liquor Trade 1997 SRA 1999 Fire 2050 Feb,2007 DCR Modifications 1864 Map 1897 Map 1933 Map 1969 Map DP 1981 1737: Rehwa Fort, popularly known as Kala Killa, was built by “Order of the Honourable Horn Esq. President and Governor of Bombay”. -Rediscovering Dharavi, Kalpana Sharma
- 5. DHARAVI TIMELINE: GROWTHOF DHARAVI 1700 1900 2000 1737 Kala Killa Koliwada 1812 Reclaiming Swamp Kumbharwada PMGP 1971 Maharashtra Slum Areas Improvement, Clearance & Redevelopment Act 1800 1930 1987 SPARC 2004 SRA 1995 SPPL 1993 Riots 1985 Illegal Liquor Trade 1997 SRA 1999 Fire 2050 Feb,2007 DCR Modifications 1864 Map 1897 Map 1933 Map 1969 Map DP 1981
- 6. 1700 1900 2000 1737 KalaKilla Koliwada 1812 Reclaiming Swamp Kumbharwada PMGP 1971 Maharashtra Slum Areas Improvement, Clearance & Redevelopment Act 1800 1930 1987 SPARC 2004 SRA 1995 SPPL 1993 Riots 1985 Illegal Liquor Trade 1997 SRA 1999 Fire 2050 Feb,2007 DCR Modifications 1864 Map 1897 Map 1933 Map 1969 Map DP 1981 1971-74: According to the Maharashtra Slum Areas Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment Act, Dharavi was declared a slum in this year. The law defines a slum in terms of structures and amenities. And under this act the Slum Improvement Board provided people of Dharavi with taps, toilets and electrical connections. The Sion-Mahim-Link Road, the 60 feet and 90 feet roads were all built around this time and the sewer lines and water lines were also laid down. The Transit Camps were built as a result of the development, which was used to relocate people who came in the way of expanding Dharavi’s main roads and also to house people who worked on those projects. -Rediscovering Dharavi, Kalpana Sharma DHARAVI TIMELINE :
- 7. 1700 1900 2000 1737 KalaKilla Koliwada 1812 Reclaiming Swamp Kumbharwada PMGP 1971 Maharashtra Slum Areas Improvement, Clearance & Redevelopment Act 1800 1930 1987 SPARC 2004 SRA 1995 SPPL 1993 Riots 1985 Illegal Liquor Trade 1997 SRA 1999 Fire 2050 Feb,2007 DCR Modifications 1864 Map 1897 Map 1933 Map 1969 Map DP 1981 1981: Development Plan of Dharavi. POPULATION (1981): 169,333 DHARAVI TIMELINE :
- 8. 1700 1900 2000 1737 KalaKilla Koliwada 1812 Reclaiming Swamp Kumbharwada PMGP 1971 Maharashtra Slum Areas Improvement, Clearance & Redevelopment Act 1800 1930 1987 SPARC 2004 SRA 1995 SPPL 1993 Riots 1985 Illegal Liquor Trade 1997 SRA 1999 Fire 2050 Feb,2007 DCR Modifications 1864 Map 1897 Map 1933 Map 1969 Map DP 1981 1985: Prime Minister’s Grant Project, which was initiated by Rajiv Gandhi lead to spending Rs.37 crore in improvement of infrastructure and some housing. PMGP was declared as the Special Planning Authority (SPA) for Dharavi POPULATION (1991): 278,636 DHARAVI TIMELINE :
- 9. 1700 1900 2000 1737 KalaKilla Koliwada 1812 Reclaiming Swamp Kumbharwada PMGP 1971 Maharashtra Slum Areas Improvement, Clearance & Redevelopment Act 1800 1930 1987 SPARC 2004 SRA 1995 SPPL 1993 Riots 1985 Illegal Liquor Trade 1997 SRA 1999 Fire 2050 Feb,2007 DCR Modifications 1864 Map 1897 Map 1933 Map 1969 Map DP 1981 1995: Slum Rehab Scheme was launched by the Shiv Sena Bahratiya Janata Party Government. -Rediscovering Dharavi, Kalpana Sharma DHARAVI TIMELINE : 1997: SRA was declared as the planning Authority for all the slums in Mumbai city. Initiated redevelopment has resulted in the construction of over 85 buildings in the area. Most sale component from Dharavi has been transferred in the form of TDR. 2004: Dharavi Area Slum Rehab Authority (SRA) was declared as the Special Planning Authority (SPA). 2007: The DCR being modified by the SRA for DRP
- 10. SECTOR PLAN ASPROPOSED BY S.R.A. :
- 11. SECTOR PLAN &DEVELOPMENT PLAN :
- 12. SOS SUPPORT OUR SLUMS Providehigher quality of life defined by: CONCERNS & CRITIQUE: HIKES H I K E S Health Income Knowledge Environment Socio-Culture
- 13. CONCERNS and CRITIQUE 1.Legal Issues Procedures prescribed under MRTP Act 1991, not followed. - All Dharavi does not qualify as SLUM - Mere modification of DCR has no legal standing The argument that DRP is nothing but an attempt to implement the sanctioned development plan (DP) is untenable in view of the changes that have taken place CONCERNS & CRITIQUE :
- 14. 2. Planning Issues Carrying out clear and transparent surveys absolutely mandatory for the Planning process - Population Survey, Household Survey, Infrastructure Survey, Ownership Survey, Physical Survey Impossibility of assessment of the adequacy in DRP due to lack of Projection studies and Planning standards not being made public Lack of land-use survey and planning strategies - Communities ignorant about project and rehabilitation plan - “Sector” approach questionable and unequal distribution of “sectors” leading to higher densities in some parts. - FSI of 4 will cause unviable densities. - No clarity about metro routes and stations in Dharavi - No link between Dharavi Infrastructure plan and Infrastructure plan of Greater Mumbai. - EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) at township level should be commissioned by the GoM CONCERNS & CRITIQUE :
- 15. 3. Financial Issues Huge profits to the developers and high revenues for GoM Basis for fixed premium @450/- sq.ft. or its subsequent revision not clear CONCERNS & CRITIQUE :
- 16. 3. Absence ofclarity No clarity on the roles of different stakeholders - Role of Government as arbitrator needs to be clearly spelt out - Responsibilities of SRA, MCGM, GoM and private developers not clear in terms of planning and implementation - No clarity on contractual provisions, MoU’s and commitments - Issues of eligibility for Rehabilitation - Private land being treated as Slum land and acquired for private Development 4. Absence of community participation in DRP Plan prepared in a top-down technocratic way - Absence of people’s participation in the formulation and conception of DRP. CONCERNS & CRITIQUE :
- 17. 5. Issues regardingallotment of consultancy for the DRP No transparent and standard procedures for appointment of consultant Mr. Mukesh Mehta Lack of qualifications and experience; unsatisfactory performance Arbitrary and unjustifiable remuneration Transformation of the role of Mr. Mukesh Mehta Deficiency in documents submitted by the consultant - Complete clearance and a top-down approach ignoring the site realities. - No base survey documents, mapping and site documentation prior to submitting tenders. CONCERNS & CRITIQUE : 6. Role of Government of Maharashtra In relation to tendering process In relation to arbitration process