SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 127
!
!
!
!
!
DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!
!
REQUEST!FOR!PROPOSALS!
FOR!PROFESSIONAL!DESIGN!SERVICES!
FOR!THE!DESIGN!OF!
!
LAMBERT(PARK(PHASE(2(
(CIP(NO.(819)(
!
SEPTEMBER!2016!
!
IMPORTANT!DATES!
RFP!ISSUED! SEPTEMBER!1,!2016!
REQUEST!FOR!INFORMATION!DEADLINE:!5:00!PM!
SEPTEMBER!27,!2016!
RELEASE!OF!INFORMATION!REQUESTED!
OCTOBER!3,!2016!
PROPOSAL!DUE!DATE/SUBMISSION!DEADLINE:!5:00!PM!
OCTOBER!10,!2016!
AWARD!DATE! NOVEMBER!2016!
APPROXIMATE!START!DATE! NOVEMBER/DECEMBER!
2016!
1!
!
!
REQUEST!FOR!PROPOSALS!
FOR!PROFESSIONAL!DESIGN!SERVICES!
FOR!THE!DESIGN!OF!
LAMBERT(PARK(PHASE(II((CIP(NO.(819)(
Table!of!Contents!
!
1.0!OVERVIEW......................................................................
............................................................2!
2.0!SCOPE!OF!SERVICES......................................................
..............................................................3!
3.0!PROPOSAL!FORMAT
...............................................................................................
....................7!
4.0!EVALUATION!CRITERIA.................................................
..............................................................10!
5.0!SELECTION!PROCESS.....................................................
..............................................................11!
6.0!PROPOSAL!REQUIREMENTS
...............................................................................................
........12!
!
ATTACHMENT!A!–!LAMBERT!PARK!MASTR!PLAN!
EXHIBIT!1!–
!PROFESSIONAL!SERVICES!AGREEMENT!SAMPLE!
!
!
!
!
!
2!
!
!
1.0(Overview((
!
The!City!of!El!Monte!(the!City)!has!made!numerous!improvem
ents!over!the!past!several!years!
to!Lambert!Park.!These!improvements!have!been!made!possibl
e!through!funds!awarded!to!the!
City!from!Air!Quality!Management!District!(AQMD)!and!the!
Conservation!Corp.!Improvements!
completed! through! 2016! include:! 1)! Installation! of!
Watershed! Gardens;! 2)! Installation! of! a!
Permeable! Pavers! Plaza;! and! 3)! Installation! of! Picnic!
Shelters;! 4)! Installation! of! passive!
improvements! and! park! amenities! within! the! Watershed!
Gardens;! and! 5)! Environmental!
Testing! for! purposes! of! abating! and! demolishing! two!
existing! buildings,! (maintenance!
room/restrooms!and!youth!hut).!!!
!
The!City!recently!commissioned!the!preparation!of!a!New!Con
ceptual!Plan!for!Lambert!Park!
and!this!plan!was!approved!by!City!Council!in!a!meeting!on!A
ugust!2,!2016.!This!Conceptual!
Plan!(See!Attachment!A!–
!Lambert!Park!Master)!will!be!the!basis!for!future!improvemen
ts!to!
Lambert!Park.!
!
The!City!of!El!Monte!(the!City)!is!soliciting!proposals!from!q
ualified!and!experienced!proposers!
to! secure! architectural! and! engineering! design! services!
for! the! preparation! of! plans,!
specifications,!and!cost!estimates!(PS&E)!and!related!construct
ion!documents,!and!to!provide!
construction! administration! services! during! the!
construction! phase! for! the! LAMBERT! PARK!
IMPROVEMENTS!PHASEc2!(CIP!NO.!819).!The!plans!and!co
st!estimates!will!be!comprehensive!
for! all! improvements! proposed! on! the! approved! Lambert!
Park! Conceptual! Plan! (Refer! to!
Attachment!“A”).!It!is!the!intent!to!have!a!complete!set!of!pla
ns!and!phase!construction!using!
remaining!funds!from!the!AQMD!Grant!and!construct!improve
ments!when!funding!is!available.!
The!Design!Project!is!to!be!funded!using!funds!awarded!to!the
!City!of!El!Monte.!This!project!is!
subject!to!state!and!federal!regulations!and!procurement!requir
ements.!!
!
At! the! of! release! of! this! RFP! The! City! has!
approximately! $900,000! remaining! on! the! AQMD!
grant!and!is!seeking!future!funding!from!Los!Angeles!County!
for!construction!of!improvements!
and! new! fields.! At! this! time! the! City! desires! to!
develop! a! comprehensive! plan! for! future!
improvements!to!Lambert!Park.!Construction!of!these!improve
ments!may!be!phased!based!on!
future!funding!availability.!
!
3!
!
!
2.0(Scope(of(Services(
!
The!City!is!seeking!a!qualified!proposer!to!provide!tech nical!p
rofessional!services!related!to!the!
design! of! parks! and! recreation! improvement! projects.! !
The! proposer! applying! should! have!
significant! experience! in! preparing! plans,! specifications,!
cost! estimates! and! obtaining! any!
required!permits!for!these!types!of!projects.!!The!objective!of!
the!Project!is!to!complete!the!
design! and! secure! approval! of! all! plans,! specifications,!
estimates,! and! permits! from! all!
applicable!agencies!in!order!to!immediately!thereafter!advertis
e,!bid,!and!award!a!construction!
contract.!!
!
The! City! had! commissioned! and! approved! a! Conceptual!
Master! Plan! (see! Attachment! “A”! c!
Lambert!Park!Master!Plan)!and!this!plan!will!be!the!basis!for!
design!services!in!this!RFP.!!
!
The!following!tasks!are!identified!for!the!scope!of!services:!
(
Task(1(–
!Have!an!initial!scoping!meeting!with!the!City!to!finalize!the!
specifics!of!the!Project!in!
accordance!with!Attachment!“A”!–
!Lambert!Park!Master!Plan.!Perform!Utility!Research/Other!
Research! and! Coordination.! Conduct! required!
surveys/design! surveys! and! prepare! detailed!
base!map!for!use!in!developing!design!plans.!In!summary!this!
task!shall!include!the!following!
services:!
!
1) Meetings!(number!of!meetings):!
a. Scoping/Kickcoff!(2)!
b. Utility!Company!(2)!
c. Stakeholders!!c!Final!Design!(2)!
d. City!Council!(2)!
e. City!Staff!(5)!
!
2)
Develop!and!maintain!Project!Schedule!for!Approval!based!on!
City!approval!process!and!
grant!restrictions!
!
3) Research,!Survey,!and!Base!Map!preparation!
!
Task(2(–
!Develop!all!design!plans!based!on!Task!1!and!Attachment!“A
”!–!Lambert!Park!Master!
Plan.!Project!Plans:!Prepare!design!plans!for!the!construction!
of:!
!
1)
Upon!completion!of!Base!Map,!conduct!second!scoping!meetin
g!with!City!to!discuss!any!
deviation!from!initial!scoping!meeting!/!approved!Conceptual!
Plan!that!may!be!required!
based!on!information!obtained!during!Task!1.!!
!
2) New! Restroom/Concession/Staff! Building.! Concession!
portion! designed! for! Level! 3!
Concession.!
!
4!
!
3) New!Plaza!
!
4) Renovate!Existing!Building!
!
5)
New!Playground!Areas;!Tot!Lot!(Age!2c5)!&!Children!(Age!5c
12)!!
!
6) New!Multicuse!Sport!Fields!
!
7) New!Field!Lighting!
!
8) New!Outdoor!Fitness!Stations!
!
9) New!Hardscape!Improvements!and!Amenities!
!
10) New!Landscape!Improvements!
!
11)
New!Utilities/Utility!Improvements!to!Support!the!proposed!im
provements!
!
12)
Funding!to!construct!all!improvements!has!not!yet!been!secure
d.!Should!full!funding!not!
be! available! at! the! time! the! design! plans! and!
specifications! are! approved,! it! may! be!
necessary! to! construct! the! improvements! in! phases! based!
on! available! funding.!
Proposers! shall! provide! services! to! separate! the! plans!
into! multiple! phases! for!
construction!(Assume!3!phases).!!Phasing!shall!take!into!accou
nt!the!time!gap!between!
phases!and!a!maximum!of!3!phases.!Fee(to(this(subtask(shall(b
e(identified(as(a(separate(
line(item(under(Task(2.!
!
Design!Services!shall!follow!and!include!Schedule!and!Schedu
le!Control!covered!under!Section!
3,! Item! 8.! Additionally,! the! scope! of! professional!
services! shall! include! coordination! with! all!
applicable! regulatory! agencies! and! outside! utility!
companies! if! required! for! the! design,!
execution!and!completion!of!this!project.!Allow!3!weeks!for!e
ach!City!review.!!
!
Plans!shall!be!submitted!at!the!following!stages!of!completion!
for!City!review!and!comment:!
30%,!65%,!95%,!100%!(Final).!!
!
Task(3(–
!Project!Specifications!at!30%,!65%,!95%,!and!100%!submittal
:!Prepare!specifications!in!
conformance! with! the! current! Standard! Specifications! for!
Public! Works! Construction!
(Greenbook)! and! other! applicable! agency! standard! plans,!
specifications,! and! guidance!
documents! in! order! to! obtain! plan! approval.! ! Provide!
the! required! permits,! standards,! and!
reference!materials!to!be!included!in!the!City’s!standard!contr
act!documents.!!Every!item!of!
work!must!be!fully!covered!including!a!measurement!clause!an
d!a!payment!clause.!
!
Task(4(–
!Construction!Estimate:!Prepare!an!engineer’s!construction!esti
mate!for!the!designed!
Project!at!the!65%!submittal!and!100%!submittal.!!Cost!estima
tes!shall!have!quantities!and!unit!
5!
!
prices!with!backcup!calculations!for!all!quantities.!!The!consul
tant!shall!verify!current!unit!prices!
at!time!of!final!plan!approval.!
!
Task(5(–
!Permitting!and!Regulations:!Develop!and!manage!the!approval
!process!for!all!required!
permits! and! environmental! documents.! ! The! consultant!
shall! observe! all! laws,! rules,! and!
regulations!concerning!environmental!permitting!and!the!scope
!of!professional!services!shall!
include!all!steps!necessary!in!the!project!development!and!per
mitting!process!to!fully!entitle!
the!project!to!move!into!the!construction!phase.!!
!
1) Document,! design,! and! incorporate! environmental!
requirements! (i.e.,! CEQA!
documentation,!etc.),!mitigation!measures,!NPDES!requirement
s!(including!adherence!
to!MS4!LID!requirements),!BMPs,!air/water!quality,!and!erosi
on/sediment!control!into!
the!Project!construction!documents!as!required.!
!
2)
Provide!a!signed!checkcoff!list!certifying!that!all!environment
al!clearances/permits!have!
been! completed! and! all! mitigation! measures! have! been!
incorporated! into! the! PS&E!
prior!to!the!advertisement!of!the!project!for!construction.!
!
3) Proposers! shall! incorporate! the! City! of! El! Monte’s!
Tree! Protection! and! Preservation!
Ordinance,!Chapter!14.03!of!the!El!Monte!Municipal!Code!(E
MMC)!as!applicable.!!The!
deliverables! provided! to! the! City! shall! conform! to! those!
regulations! to! ensure! a!
complete!and!conforming!project.!!The!consultant!and!its!subc
onsultants!shall!comply!
with! Public! Works! Greenbook! and! EMMC! in! the!
preparation! of! full,! complete,! and!
accurate!PS&E.!Note:!The!City!shall!supply!the!successful!pro
poser!with!a!recent!tree!
survey!report!for!Lambert!Park.!
!
4) Proposers! shall! incorporate! all! federal,! state,! and! local!
laws,! rules,! and! regulations!
concerning! public! works! as! applicable.! ! The! deliverables!
provided! to! the! City! shall!
conform! to! those! regulations! to! ensure! a! complete! and!
conforming! project.! ! The!
consultant!and!its!subconsultants!shall!comply!with!Public!Con
tract!Code!Section!10120!
in!the!preparation!of!full,!complete,!and!accurate!PS&E.!
!
Task(6(–
!Construction!Support!Services:!Provide!engineering!services!p
rior!to,!during,!and!
following!construction!including:!
(
1)
Attend!a!precconstruction!meeting!and!provide!clarification!of!
contract!documents!as!
needed.!
!
2) Assist!the!City!with!Request!for!Information!responses.!
!
3) Provide! review! of! the! Contractor’s! submittals! for!
conformance! with! the! contract!
documents.!
!
4)
Subsequent!to!completion!of!construction,!the!consultant!shall!
provide!Mylar!plots!of!
6!
!
revised!drawings!incorporating!all!ascbuilt!revisions!clouded!a
nd!noted!in!the!revision!
block!using!the!Contractor’s!record!red!lines.!!The!Project!dra
wings!should!be!stamped!
“Project! Record! Drawings”.! ! Transmit! original! Mylar!
Record! Drawings! and! two! CDs!
containing!all!project!drawings!including!AutoCAD!files!as!we
ll!as!PDF!versions.!!
!
All!data,!documents,!and!other!products!used!or!developed!dur
ing!the!project!will!become!the!
property!of!the!City.!
!
7!
!
!
3.0(Proposal(Format(
All!proposals!shall!include!the!following!information!and!com
ply!with!the!associated!page!limit!
restrictions.!!Note!that!1!page!includes!the!front!side!of!an!8.5
x11!sheet!of!paper!and!the!cover!
does!not!constitute!a!page.!
!
1)
Cover!Letter.!!Maximum!1!page!cover!letter!signed!by!an!offic
er!of!the!firm,!binding!the!
proposer! to! all! of! the! commitments! made! in! the!
submittal.! ! The! letter! shall! include!
name,!address!and!phone!number!of!the!person!authorized!to!r
epresent!the!proposer!
and!shall!include!the!following!Statement:!
a.
I!HAVE!READ!UNDERSTOOD,!AND!AGREED!TO!ALL!STA
TEMENTS!IN!THIS!REQUEST!
FOR! PROPOSAL! AND! ACKNOWLEDGE! RECEIPT! OF!
ALL!
ADDENDUMS/AMENDMENTS! AS! WELL! AS! TO! THE!
TERMS,! CONDITIONS,! AND!
ATTACHMENTS!REFERENCED.!
!
2)
Proposer’s!Background.!!!Maximum!2!page!background!on!the
!proposer!and!its!area(s)!
of!professional!expertise!relevant!to!this!RFP.!!An!additional!
1!cpage!may!be!included!to!
highlight!the!background!of!each!proposed!subconsul tant!to!be
!used!by!the!proposer!
and!the!specific!task(s)!or!functions!the!subconsultant!will!per
form.!!!
!
3)
Qualifications!and!Experience!of!Proposer’s!Personnel.!!Maxi
mum!3!page!summary!of!
the!relevant!experience,!work!history,!training,!education!and!
special!certifications!of!
the! proposer’s! personnel! who! will! be! performing! the!
professional! services!
contemplated!under!this!RFP!on!the!proposer’s!behalf.!!Briefly
!discuss!the!Consultant!
team's!qualifications!and!experience!with!projects!of!a!similar!
magnitude!and!nature.!!
Proposers!shall!provide!identical!information!for!all!subconsul
tants’!performing!any!of!
the! tasks! or! services! contemplated! under! this! RFP! on!
the! proposer’s! behalf.! ! The!
summary!shall!also!include!the!office!lo cation!of!key!personne
l!proposed!to!work!on!this!
contract.! ! Relevant! experience! can! include! your!
company’s! overall! experience,!
experience! with! similar! projects! and! the! experience! of!
individuals! on! your! proposed!
team.!!Show!how!your!experience!relates!to!the!demands!of!th
is!project.!
!
4)
Project!Approach.!!Maximum!3!page!summary!of!the!proposed
!approach!to!designing!
this! park! improvement! project.! ! The! proposer! shall!
explain! the! way! in! which! the!
proposer!will!timely!complete!all!of!the!tasks!called!for!under
!the!RFP!along!with!an!
estimate!of!the!time!it!will!take!to!complete!each!task.!!Includ
e!a!brief!overview!of!the!
Consultant's! understanding! of! the! project.! ! The! content!
will! reflect! the! particular!
viewpoint!of!the!Consultant.!!!
!
5) Proposed! Personnel.! ! Maximum! 2! page! resume! for! the!
project! manager! and! 1! page!
resume! for! each! of! the! other! key! personnel,! including!
subconsultants,! which! will! be!
performing!the!majority!of!the!work!on!this!project/contract.!!
Resumes!for!corporate!
leadership!should!not!be!included!unless!said!individuals!will!
be!performing!substantial!
8!
!
work!on!this!project.!!The!designated!Project!Manager!shall!be
!the!primary!contact!with!
the!City!during!the!contract!period!and!shall!function!in!that!c
apacity!while!employed!by!
the!firm.!!In!addition,!the!City!must!approve!changes!of!perso
nnel.!!
6) Quality! Assurance/Quality! Control! Procedures.! !
Maximum! 1! page! brief! description! of!
the! consultant’s! approach! to! implement! a! Projectcspecific!
Quality! Control! Plan.!!
Describe! the! major! elements! and! steps! of! the! quality!
assurance! /! quality! control!
(QA/QC)! program! and! procedures! that! will! be! followed!
for! each! deliverable! (i.e.!
engineering! discipline! review,! coordination! review,!
constructability! review,! QA/QC!
control!review,!etc.).!!
!
7)
References.!!Each!proposal!must!include!at!least!3!public!agen
cy!references!going!back!
at!not!more!than!five!(5)!years!from!the!issuance!of!this!RFP!i
n!which!the!proposer!was!
engaged!to!perform!tasks!similar!to!those!requested!under!this!
RFP.!!References!should!
place!an!emphasis!on!past!projects!in!which!the!personnel!to!b
e!used!by!proposer!for!
this!project!were!deployed.!The!references!should!include!the!
name,!title!and!contact!
information! of! the! public! agency! officer! or! employee!
responsible! for! overseeing! the!
proposer’s!work.!!
!
8)
Schedule!and!Schedule!Control.!!Maximum!2!page!schedule!de
tailing!when!the!specific!
Tasks! will! be! completed.! ! Proposers! should! factor! in!
additional! time! that! may! be!
required!due!to!reasonably!foreseeable!types!of!delays.!The!pr
oposal!shall!identify!all!
critical!task!sequencing!and!critical!paths!required!to!ensure!t h
at!the!work!is!timely!and!
completely!completed.!The!Consultant!shall!submit!a!detailed!
project!schedule!outlining!
the!tasks,!activities,!deliverables,!milestone!and!duration!requi
red!for!the!completion!
and! submission! of! each! of! the! deliverables! identified! in!
the! Scope! of! Services.! The!
schedule! shall! also! factor! in! reasonable! review! and!
feedback! periods! for! draft!
deliverables!by!City!staff!as!well!as!any!and!all!legally!manda
ted!review!and!comment!
period,!including!those!that!may!be!required!by!third!party!reg
ulatory!agencies.!!
!
9) Fee!Schedule/Cost!Proposal.!
!Maximum!3!page!detailed!cost!estimate!for!performing!
specific!Tasks!identified!in!the!RFP!and!a!schedule!of!rates!fo
r!each!proposed!personnel!
that!may!be!tasked!to!complete!the!Project.!The!Taskcspecific!
cost!estimate!shall!include!
an! estimate! of! the! number! of! hours! per! staff! member!
by! proposed! task! and! clearly!
identify!an!hourly!rate!schedule!for!the!proposed!staff.!The!pr
oposal!shall!indicate!the!
compensation!structure!for!performing!specific!services!identif
ied!in!Tasks!1!through!6!
(e.g.! flat! lump! sum! or! hourly! rate! structure)! for! each!
Task.! ! The! proposal! shall! also!
include! costs! and! expenses! related! to! photocopying,!
postage,! travel,! etc.! (i.e.!
Reimbursement! expenses).! ! To! the! extent! that! a! proposal!
contemplates! the! use! of!
subconsultants! to! perform! any! one! or! more! of! the! above!
described! tasks! on! the!
proposer’s! behalf,! the! proposal! shall! include! a! List! of!
Subconsultants! identifying! all!
subconsultants!and!state!the!fee!for!each!subconsultant!in!the!
Fee!Schedule!under!the!
appropriate!Task!under!which!the!service!will!be!provided.!!In
!so!far!as!the!proposer’s!
proposal! contemplates! an! increase! in! compensation! rates!
or! charges! prior! to! the!
completion!of!Tasks!1!through!6,!and!during!the!term!of!the!p
ortion!of!the!PSA!or!any!
9!
!
extension!term,!the!proposal!shall!clearly!indicate!when!such!i
ncreases!will!take!effect!
and!by!how!much.!
!
a.
The!Fee!Schedule/Cost!Proposal!shall!be!delivered!in!a!separat
e!sealed!envelope!
which!is!plainly!marked!on!the!outside!“Lambert!Park!Phase!II
!(CIP!NO.!819)”!and!
addressed! to! the! abovecmentioned! location.! ! The!
envelope! shall! contain! the!
name!and!address!of!the!consultant!clearly!marked!on!the!outs
ide.!
!
The!City!reserves!the!right!to!delete!specific!task(s).!!
10!
!
!
4.0(Evaluation(Criteria(
Each! proposal! shall! be! evaluated! on! the! basis! of! the!
proposer’s! expertise,! experience! and!
training!and!the!expertise!of!its!key!personnel!along!with!prior
!contracting!history,!approach!to!
the!project,!cost,!proposed!schedule!and!compliance!with!the!
RFP!requirements!including!the!
terms!of!the!attached!PSA.!Each!such!factor!shall!be!weighted
!by!the!City!as!follows:!!
1) Expertise,! Experience! &! Training! Plus! Prior!
Contracting! History! (25%)! –! The!
expertise,! experience! and! training! of! the! proposer! and!
its! key! personnel! and!
previous!experience!with!similar!work!in!similar!fields!and!qu
alifications!and!depth!
of! the! staff! that! will! perform! the! work! on! this! project.!
! This! factor! includes!
evaluation!of!the!proposer’s!prior!contracting!history,!
including!the!review!of!the!
proposer’s!certifications!relating!to!false!claims,!debarment!an
d!civil!litigation.!
!
2) Project! Approach! (40%)! –! The! proposer’s!
responsiveness! in! developing! a!
comprehensive!plan!while!meeting!regulatory!requirements!and
!the!City’s!specific!
needs.!
!
3) Cost! (15%)! –! The! proposed! compensation! structure!
(inclusive! of! hourly! rates! of!
compensation,!pass!through!costs!and!subconsultant!costs)!for!
the!performance!of!
Tasks! 1! through! 8,! inclusive! of! its! proposed! notcto!
cexceed! sum.! ! The! proposers!
proposed! strategy! for! containing! costs! incurred! by! City!
while! still! meeting! the!
objectives!and!standards!set!forth!under!the!RFP.!
!
4) Schedule!(10%)!–
!Proposal!for!completing!the!project!in!a!timely!manner,!inclu
sive!
of! the! proposer’s! ability! to! identify! critical! paths! for!
the! timely! and! competent!
completion!of!all!work!contemplated!under!the!RFP.!!
!
5) Compliance! with! RFP! (10%)! –! The! ability! of! the!
proposer! to! comply! with! all!
instructions!set!forth!under!this!RFP!as!well!as!the!proposer’s!
ability!to!agree!to!all!of!
the!terms!and!conditions!of!the!attached!PSA!without!modifica
tion,!particularly!as!
relates!to!indemnification,!insurance!requirements!and!standard
s!of!care.!!
!
!
11!
!
!
5.0(Selection(Process(
A! selection! committee,! comprised! of! City! staff! will!
review! the! proposals.! ! Proposals! will! be!
ranked!on!qualifications!and!the!selection!committee!may!choo
se!to!interview!several!of!the!
top!ranked!proposers.!However,!at!
its!sole!discretion!the!selection!committee!may!dispense!
with!interviews!and!select!a!proposer!to!perform!the!work.!
12!
!
!
6.0(Proposal(Requirements(
Proposals!must!be!submitted!using!the!following!methods:!!!
Three!(3)!printed!copies!of!the!proposal!must!be!received!prio
r!to!the!Submission!Deadline.!!
Proposals!shall!be!submitted!to!the!following!address:!
!
City!of!El!Monte!!
Department!of!Public!Works!–!Engineering!Division!
City!Hall!West!
11333!Valley!Boulevard!
El!Monte,!CA!91731c3293!
!
ATTN:!Elaine!Jeng,!P.E.!
Public!Works!&!Utilities!Director/City!Engineer!
!
Subject:!RFP!–!Lambert!Park!Phase!II!–!CIP!NO.!819!
!
Proposals!may!be!submitted!via!personal!delivery,!overnight!c
ourier!(e.g.,!FedEx!or!UPS)!or!U.S.!
Mail.!Proposals!must!be!received!by!or!before!the!Submission!
Deadline.! !Proposals!that!are!
deposited! with! an! overnight! courier! or! post! marked! prior!
to! the! Submission! Deadline! but!
received!after!the!Submission!Deadline!will!not!be!considered!
by!the!City.!!!
Submitted! proposals! shall! be! maintained! as! confidential!
records! of! the! City! up! to! the!
Submission!Deadline.!!Proposers!may!withdraw,!modify!and/or
!resubmit!a!proposal!prior!to!the!
Submission!Deadline!but!not!after.!
!Proposers!shall!be!bound!to!the!terms!of!their!proposal!
following! the! Submission! Deadline,! however,! the! City,! in!
its! sole! and! absolute! discretion,!
reserves! the! right! to! accept! post! deadline! modifications!
if! it! is! determined! that! such!
modifications!are!in!the!best! interests!of!the!City.!
!The!City!also!reserves!the!right!to!waive!
minor!noncsubstantive!informalities!or!allow!the!proposer!to!c
orrect!them.!
!
1)
Proposers!shall!be!solely!and!exclusively!responsible!for!all!c
osts!incurred!in!connection!
with! the! preparation! and! submission! of! the! proposals;!
demonstrations;! interviews;!
preparation! of! responses! to! questions! and! requests! for!
additional! information;! for!
contract!discussions;!or!for!anything!in!any!way!related!to!this
!RFP.! !The!City! is!not!
liable!for!any!costs!incurred!by!a!proposer!in!response!to!this!
RFP.!!Whether!or!not!a!
proposer!is!awarded!a!contract!pursuant!to!this!RFP,!no!propo
ser!shall!be!entitled!to!
reimbursement!for!any!costs!or!expenses!associated!with!the!p
roposer’s!participati on!
in!this!RFP!process.!!
!
2) Late!proposals!will!not!be!considered.!
!
3)
The!City!reserves!the!right!to!reject!any!and!all!proposals!rece
ived!as!a!result!of!this!
RFP.!!The!City’s!potential!award!of!a!contract!will!not!be!bas
ed!on!any!single!factor!nor!
will! it! be! based! solely! or! exclusively! on! the! lowest!
cost! proposal.! ! If! a! contract! is!
13!
!
awarded,! it! will! be! awarded! to! the! proposer! who! in! the!
judgment! of! the! City! has!
presented!an!optimal!balance!of!relevant!experience,!technical!
expertise,!price,!quality!
of!service,!work!history!and!other!factors!which!the!City!may!
consider!relevant!and!
important!in!determining!which!proposal!is!best!for!the!City.!!
!
4)
The!City!reserves!the!right!to!cancel!or!modify!this!R FP.!!The
re!is!no!guarantee!that!the!
City!will!award!contract.!
!
5) The! City! reserves! the! right! to! investigate! the!
qualifications! of! any! proposer! under!
consideration!including!proposed!subcontractors!and!parties!ot
herwise!related!to!the!
proposer!and!require!confirmation!of!information!furnished!by!
a!proposer,!or!require!
additional! evidence! of! experience! and! qualifications! to!
provide! the! services! or!
otherwise!discharge!the!obligations!required!by!this!RFP.!
!
6)
Following!the!Submission!Deadline,!the!City,!pursuant!to!the!
California!Public!Records!
Act!(Govt.!Code!Section!6250!et!seq.)!reserves!the!right!to!ma
ke!copies!of!all!submitted!
proposals!available!for!inspection!and!copying!by!any!intereste
d!member!of!the!public,!
except!to!the!limited!extent!the!City!determines!that!any!infor
mation!contained!in!a!
proposal!is!legally!privileged!under!the!California!Public!Reco
rds!Act.!!By!submission!of!
a!proposal,!proposers!acknowledge!and!agree!that!their!propos
al!and!any!information!
contained!therein!may!be!disclosed!by!the!City!to!interested!m
embers!of!the!public,!
including!other!proposers.!!
!
7)
The!City!reserves!the!right!to!approve!or!disapprove!of!particu
lar!subcontractors,!joint!
venture!partners,!or!other!proposed!team!members.!
!
8)
The!City!reserves!the!right!to!evaluate!responses!in!terms!of!t
he!best!interests!of!the!
City,!applying!criteria!provided!in!this!RFP!and!any!other!crit
eria!the!City,! in! its!sole!
discretion,!deems!pertinent.!
!
9)
By!the!submission!of!a!proposal,!each!proposer!accepts!and!ag
rees!to!execute!a!written!
Professional!Services!Agreement!(PSA)!
in!the!form!attached!hereto!as!Exhibit!1.! !By!
submission!of!a!proposal,!each!proposer!agrees!to!execute!a!P
SA!with!the!City!in!the!
form!attached!hereto!as!Exhibit!1,!inclusive!of!all!stated!terms
!and!conditions!relating!
to! indemnification,! required! insurance! and! standard! of!
care! requirements.! ! If! a!
proposer!is!unable!to!agree!to!any!of!the!terms!or!conditions!o
f!the!PSA!in!the!form!
attached!hereto,!the!proposer!must!identify!the!provision(s)!in!
question!and!provide!an!
explanation!as!to!why!the!proposer!cannot!comply!with!such!p
rovisions.!!If!a!proposers!
objection! to! a! certain! provision! of! the! PSA! is! merely! a!
question! of! added! cost,! the!
proposer!shall!indicate!in!the!proposal!the!difference!in!cost!a
ssociated!with!complying!
with!the!provision(s)!versus!the!cost!associated!with!the!City’s
!waiver!or!modification!
of!the!provision(s).!!The!City!shall!be!under!no!obligation!to!
make!modifications!to!the!
PSA! after! a! contract! has! been! awarded! and! proposers!
shall! be! deemed! to! have!
incorporated!all!costs!associated!with!compliance!with!the!PS
A!into!their!proposal.!!A!
14!
!
proposer’s!inability!to!comply!with!one!or!more!provisions!of!
the!PSA!shall!be!a!factor!
that!will!be!considered!by!the!City!in!determining!which!prop
osal!will!serve!the!best!
interest!of!the!City!when!all!other!factors!are!taken!into!accou
nt.!!
!
10)
All!proposals!must!remain!valid!for!a!minimu m!period!of!nine
ty!(90)!calendar!days!after!
the! Submission! Deadline.! ! Responses! may! not! be!
modified! or! withdrawn! by! the!
proposer!during!this!period!of!time!except!in!accordance!with!
this!RFP!and!with!written!
permission!granted!by!the!City.!
!
11)
All!questions!or!requests!for!clarification!shall!be!submitted!vi
a!email!to!Alan!Palermo!
at! [email protected]! by! the! REQUEST! FOR!
INFORMATION! DEADLINE.! ! All!
questions!received!by!this!deadline!will!be!addressed!and!post
ed!on!the!City’s!website!
(www.ci.elcmonte.ca.us)!by!the!RELEASE!OF!INFORMATION
!REQUESTED!DATE.!
!
12)
If!it!becomes!necessary!to!revise!any!part!of!this!RFP,!an!add
endum!will!be!posted!on!
the!City’s!website.!!It!shall!be!the!sole!responsibility!of!the!pr
oposer!to!check!for!any!
addendums!to!the!RFP!that!may!be!issued!by!the!City.!
!
13)
It!is!presumed!that!each!proposer!has!read!and!is!thoroughly!f
amiliar!with!the!scope!of!
services!to!be!performed!under!this!RFP.!
!
14) The!proposer!agrees!that,! if!a!contract!
is!awarded!to!a!proposer,!the!proposer!shall!
make!no!claim!against!the!City!or!any!of!the!funding!agencies
!because!of!any!estimate!
or!statement!made!by!any!employees,!agents,!or!consultants!of
!the!City!which!may!
prove!to!be!erroneous!in!any!respect.!
!
15)
Proposers!may!withdraw!their!proposal!prior!to!the!Submission
!Deadline.!
!
A
ttachm
ent “A
”
Page | 77
3Significance of Materials Used in ArtRita Tekippe and Pamela
J. Sachant
3.1 LEARNING OUTCOMES
After completing this chapter, you should be able to:
• Describe the differences among valuation of art materials,
especially with regard to
intrinsic qualities of raw material versus produced objects
• Discuss the differences between monetary and cultural values
for works of art
• Discuss the idea of “borrowed” significance that comes with
the re-use of components
from previous artworks
• Describe the significance of value added to objects by
complex artistic processes or by
changing tastes in different eras
3.2 INTRODUCTION
Among the aspects of an artwork that evoke
response, aid understanding, and contribute
meaning will be the material(s) used in its cre-
ation. These materials might make it more or
less important, more or less valuable, or might
bring a variety of associations that are not in-
herent in the essential form. For example, you
might recognize a vase not merely as a vase, but
as a Louis Comfort Tiffany (1848-1933, USA)
Favrile glass vase. (Figure 3.1) Knowing the cre-
ator, material, and special processes involved in
the artwork’s creation would add to and might
change your perception and appreciation in sev-
eral important respects. For example, you could
Figure 3.1 | Bowl
Artist: Louis Comfort Tiffany
Source: Met Museum
License: Public Domain
CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED
IN ART
Page | 78
INTRODUCTION TO ART
link it to an important artist, an innovative artistic technique, a
significant period in American dé-
cor and manufacturing and marketing, a valuation based on its
collectability, and numerous other
interesting details about its creation and use.
The most apparent choices in this regard are
for three-dimensional forms such as sculpture
and architecture, where it is more likely that
costly and precious materials such as gold, silver,
gems, marble, or bronze are used in its creation.
The distinction among material choices for draw-
ing and paintings will also have certain effects for
their meanings. For example, if a painter applied
gold leaf, 22K gold pounded into extremely thin
sheets, to a painting’s surface, the monetary and
cultural value of the work increases. (Figure 3.2)
The monetary value refers to the amount a
buyer is willing to pay, which in this case includes
the cost of the materials the artist factors into the
price of the artwork. The cultural value is the
perceived quality or merit of the work: what it is
worth according to that culture’s standards of ar-
tistic importance or excellence. If a work of art
has high monetary or cultural value, the owner’s
reputation and status are, in turn, elevated.
Without considering each and every possibil-
ity in this regard, we should look at a few pointed
examples that will help us know what to consid-
er when we examine artworks with a view to the
choices of materials that the artist (or patron) must have made.
The techniques for many of these
is discussed in greater detail in other parts of the text, so our
primary focus here will be on the
intrinsic materials, although the ways they are worked, used,
and combined are inextricably sig-
nificant in some of these cases.
3.3 UTILITY AND VALUE OF MATERIALS
The earliest drawings, paintings, vessels, and sculptures were
made with whatever the artists
could find and turn to their use for creating images and objects;
such readily-available material
includes mud, clay, twigs, straw, minerals, and plants that they
could use directly or with slight
alteration, such as grinding and mixing minerals with water to
apply to cave walls. (Figure 3.3)
Experimentation was surely part of the process and, just as
surely, much of it is lost to us now,
although we have some examples of works, materials, and tools
to give us insight into the artistic
processes and material choices.
Figure 3.2 | Annunciation to the Shepherds,
illumination from the Book of Pericopes
(Lectionary) of Henry II, fol. 8v, 1002-1012 CE.
Source: Artstor.org
License: Public Domain
http://Artstor.org
Page | 79
INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART
For example, in works such as this earthenware, or baked clay,
vessel, the artist had ex-
plored sufficiently to discover that mixing a certain type of
earth in certain proportions with water
would yield a flexible substance. The resulting clay could be
handbuilt, generally by wrapping
and smoothing coils, into a vessel shaped with a conical bottom
that would sit nicely in a coal fire
for heating its contents. (Figure 3.4) A twig or string might be
used to incise marks in the surface,
not only to decorate it, but also to make it easier to hold onto
than if it were completely smooth.
Dating to c. 3,500 BCE, pots such as this from the late Neolithic
era in Korea are known as Jeul-
mun pottery, meaning “comb-patterned.” The clay could be
found in different colors, textures,
density, potential for adherence, etc. It could be manipulated
by hand to make containers to
store, transport, cook, or serve all sorts of goods.
The invention of the potter’s wheel allowed artists to “throw”
the clay on a rotating platform
the artist operated by hand or powered with a kicking motion.
When and where the potter’s wheel
first appeared is much debated, but it was widely used in
Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Southeast Asia
before 3,000 BCE. Using a potter’s wheel allowed the artist to
turn vessels with thinner walls, a
greater variety of and more uniform shapes and sizes, and a
larger array of painted and incised
decorative elements for additional aesthetic appeal. They could,
as well, make molds for serial
production of commonly used types of pots.
By the time of the Ming Dynasty in China (1368-1644), vases
such as this from the Xuande
period (1426-1435) painted in imperial (cobalt) blue and white
display both the technical inno-
vations and the remarkable degree of refinement achieved.
(Figure 3.5) The development of such
Figure 3.3 | Reproduction of a bison of the cave of Altamira
Author: User “Rameessos”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: Public Domain
Figure 3.4 | Korean neolithic pot, found
in Busan
Author: User “Good friend100”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: Public Domain
CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED
IN ART
Page | 80
INTRODUCTION TO ART
mineral resources as kaolin and petuntse allowed ceramicists
to create porcelain, one of the most refined and hardest types of
pottery, which became known as “china” because of the origins
of the materials and processes; chinaware was soon emulated
the world over for its beauty and utility as tableware and décor.
Traders from Portugal returned from China with chinaware
(porcelain vessels) in the sixteenth century. The semi -translu-
cent material, elegant shapes, and glass-like, intricately dec-
orated surfaces of the pots were unlike anything produced in
Europe at that time. The demand for such wares quickly spread
throughout Europe, and ceramicists on that continent spent the
next two centuries trying to unlock the secret of how to create
such smooth, white, and hard pottery. Ehrenfried Walther von
Tschirnhaus and Johann Friedrich Böttger, both employed for
that purpose by Augustus II the Strong, Elector of Saxony (to-
day Germany) and King of Poland (r. 1694-1733), are credited
with producing the first European porcelain in 1708. It would
become known as Meissen ware because it was produced at the
factory set up in the town by Augustus II for that purpose to
safeguard the formula and maintain his exclusive control over
the creation and sale of European porcelain. (Figure 3.6)
The monopoly held by Augustus II was short-lived, howev-
er, as the secret was sold and a competing factory opened in
Figure 3.5 | A Ming dynasty
Xuande mark and period
(1426-1435) imperial blue and
white vase
Author: User “Meliere”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Figure 3.6 | Teapot
Artist: Königliche Porzellan Manufaktur
Author: Walters Art Museum
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Figure 3.7 | Pitcher
Artist: American Porcelain Manufacturing Company
Source: Met Museum
License: OASC
Page | 81
INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART
Vienna, Austria, by 1717. From there, variations of the formula
and the production of porcelain
spread throughout Europe as demand increased from the
privilege of royalty, to the rich and titled,
and eventually to all who could afford the status-giving ware.
For example, this nineteenth-cen-
tury commemorative pitcher made by the American Porcelain
Manufacturing Company would
have been presented to specially mark an occasion. (Figure 3.7)
Although it is a distant relative
of Chinese imperial porcelain ware and the royal courts of
Europe, the techniques and materi-
als used in its creation were still associated with tradition,
wealth, and high social standing, elevating the cultural val -
ue of this mass-produced vessel to the level of a keepsake
or even a family heirloom. Objects such as this are valued
beyond their monetary worth or utilitarian purposes, both
due to the tactile and aesthetic qualities that come from
the physical substance and techniques used and to histori -
cal and social associations they hold.
Similarly, drawing and painting, apparently first confined
to the rock walls of nature, were areas of exploration for artists
who later applied color to the built walls of architecture, and
then to portable objects of various types. Ceramic ware was
decorated with images from nature, pictorial and narrative
motifs, and messages of myth, power, and even everyday
life. The same is true of tomb walls of Egypt (Figure
3.8), palace walls in ancient Iraq, (Ashurnasirpal II with
Attendants and Soldier: http://www.museumsyndicate.
com/item.php?item=36470) and Greek vessels used for
practical or ritual purposes (Figure 3.9).
Figure 3.8 | Egyptian tomb wall painting
Author: British Library
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC0 1.0
Figure 3.9 | Terracotta krater
Source: Met Museum
License: OASC
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/item.php?item=36470
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/item.php?item=36470
CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED
IN ART
Page | 82
INTRODUCTION TO ART
Eventually such vessels, as well as books and other ob-
jects, bore written information and pictorial explications
of textual content: illustrations. Early textual works were
often inscribed on stone tablets to ensure their durability
or on relatively fragile materials like papyrus that required
laborious preparation to make it suitable for conveying in-
formation. In either case, the materials used added to the
work’s significance. By the time of the development of the
codex (probably in the Roman era), or manuscript with
bound pages, the most common form of modern physical
books, the choice material was animal skin, as seen in man-
uscripts throughout Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages,
roughly the beginning of the fourth to the fifteenth centu-
ries, in the Western and the Middle Eastern regions of the
world. (Figures 3.10 and 3.11) Sheepskin, or parchment,
the most commonly used support for written works, was
obtained by laborious preparation of the pelts, through
scraping and buffing the surface to make it suitable for use
by scribes and il-
lustrators who add-
ed the words and
pictures. The most
refined book arts
were often presented on vellum, or calfskin, prized for its
smoother and finer surface. When used for especially im-
portant works or those made for royal purposes, it was often
dyed purple or dark blue, with script applied in gold or sil -
ver ink and illustrations that included areas of gold or silver.
(see Figure 3.2) These lustrous images were known as illu-
minations, that is, given light. The viewer would at once
recognize the special and distinctive treatment implied by
the use of such precious materials and know that the patron
had paid well for an elegant and important book.
3.4 PRECIOUS MATERIALS, SPOLIA,
AND BORROWED GLORY
Objects made for sacred or royal use were often wrought
of such lavish and treasured components as vellum, silk, lin-
en, wool, ivory, gold, silver, gems, and rare stones and min-
erals. Frequently crafted for further refinement, such works
Figure 3.10 | Historiated Letter L,
with illustration of the Tree of Jesse,
Capuchin’s Bible, f. 7v, c. 1180. BNF
Author: User “Soefrm”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: Public Domain
Figure 3.11 | Kitab al-Bulhan:
Middle Eastern House and Lifting
Machine, Arab scientific manuscript
leaf. 1. 14th century
Author: User “Peacay”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: Public Domain
Page | 83
INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART
show their precious properties to advantage. In ancient
Rome/Byzantium, there were quarries
for porphyry, a rich purple marble stone (the basis for the
association of the color purple with
royalty). Because it was restricted to royal purposes, its very
appearance carried connotations
of the imperial significance of any work made from it. It was
often used for columns and other
architectural components that thereby accentuated important
structures or parts of them. Once
the imperially controlled mines were abandoned in the fifth
century CE, new items could not be
made of porphyry, so older monuments were sometimes pillaged
and re-used, with the royal sig-
nificance transferred to the plunderers, implying not only the
replacement of the old order by the
new, but also the superiority of the conquerors.
Porphyry burial containers were especially prized in antiquity
and the Middle Ages. Constan-
tina was the eldest daughter of Emperor Constantine the Great
(r. 306-337 CE), the Roman ruler
who in 313 CE decreed early Christians could practice their
faith without persecution and confis-
cated land should be returned to the Church. Although
Constantine considered himself a Chris-
tian, he did not abandon the Roman gods and religious rituals.
For example, in 321 CE he stated
that Christians and pagans alike should observe the day of the
sun (later named Sunday); the cult
of the sun god had been popularly observed in Roman culture
for centuries, and associations of
the sun as the source of light, warmth, and life had been
adopted by those of the Christian faith.
Constantine, according to legend, was baptized a Christian on
his deathbed in 337 CE.
When his daughter Constantina died in 354 CE, she was
entombed in a porphyry sarcoph-
agus, or stone coffin, that was richly carved with motifs from
both the pagan Roman and Chris-
tian faiths. (Figure 3.12) There are small, winged cupids
gathering grapes among garlands of
grape vines with peacocks and a ram below on the front and
back of the coffin, and cupids
treading on grapes on both ends. In Roman mythology, such
scenes were associated with Bac-
chus (known to the Greeks as Di-
onysus), the god of the wine har-
vest and wine making who as
a baby was reborn after having
been slaughtered by the Titans.
Interpreted as Christian motifs,
the cupids, who became known
as putti or small, winged angels,
are seen as preparing the grapes
for the Eucharist, the sacrament
commemorating the Last Supper
by consecration of the bread and
wine as the Body and Blood of Je-
sus Christ. Such re-imaging and
re-purposing of motifs and their
meanings were frequently seen
at this time of transition from pa-
ganism to Christianity; further,
Figure 3.12 | Sarcophagus of Constantina
Author: User “Jean-Pol GRANDMONT”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED
IN ART
Page | 84
INTRODUCTION TO ART
having been adopted by Constantine and his
family, they were associated with imperial pow-
er and carried connotations of the Christian con-
quest of paganism.
Later, in the eighth and ninth centuries CE,
Charlemagne (r. 768-814 CE) used pillaged por-
phyry columns inside arches on the upper level
of his imperial chapel, a building intended for
his own entombment. (Figure 3.13) The Palatine
Chapel (c. 796-798 CE, consecrated 805 CE)
was part of the palace complex Charlemagne
had built at Aachen, in what is now Germany.
The interior of the chapel is an octagon topped
by a dome supported by heavy piers with arches
on the second level, where the imperial throne
is located, with a view to the high altar (the ta-
ble or other surface where religious rituals
are carried out) located across the church on
the first floor below. (Figure 3.14) The design
of the building is modeled on mausolea,
or buildings containing tombs, and church-
es from the late Roman, early Christian, and
early Byzantine periods (fourth-seventh cen-
turies), such as San Vitale (526-647 CE) in
Ravenna, Italy. (Figure 3.15) Charlemagne,
who was not only King of the Franks and
King of the Lombards but was also crowned
as the first Holy Roman Emperor in 800 CE,
used that design and the plundered columns
to signify the revival and replacement of the
old Roman Empire with his own reign as a
Christian world ruler.
Figure 3.13 | Aachen, Palace Chapel of
Charlemagne. c. 800
Author: User “Velvet”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Figure 3.14 | Cross-sections of the Palace Chapel
of Aachen
Author: User “Sir Gawain”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: Public Domain
Page | 85
INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART
Among others, Holy Roman Emperor Henry (or
Heinrich) II (r. 973-1024) similarly borrowed and
supplanted Charlemagne’s glory by adopting his pal-
ace complex at Aachen and adding to its structure
and furnishings with his own statements of imperi-
al power. Henry II commissioned a lavish pulpit for
the chapel that was completed in 1014. (Figure 3.16)
The semi-circular pulpit has a smaller semi-circle to
either side, a shape known as a trefoil. The center
is made up of nine rectangular panels covered with
chased gilt copper that has been formed by ham-
mering into low relief images of the Four Evange-
lists. The panels are adorned with gemstones and
embellished with enamel, powdered glass fused to
the surface by heat, and filigree, beads or threads
of gold or silver arranged in designs on a metal sur-
face. The three ivory panels on each of the smaller
semi-circles depict pagan mythological figures; the
panels were made in Egypt in the sixth century CE.
Re-used parts such as the porphyry columns, gem-
stones, and ivory panels are known as spolia, remnants that had
been taken from older art and architecture and incorporated into
new art objects and places with the implications of conquest,
supe-
riority, and heritage for the new patrons.
Figure 3.15 | San Vitale, Ravenna
Author: User “Väsk”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: Public Domain
Figure 3.16 | Ambon (11th-
century) of Henry II, Holy
Roman Emperor. Aachen
Cathedral, Germany.
Author: User “HOWI”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Figure 3.17 | The Barbarossa chandelier
Author: User “Lokilech”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED
IN ART
Page | 86
INTRODUCTION TO ART
Another, later Holy Roman Emperor, Frederick I (r. 1155-
1190), and his wife, Beatrice, commissioned a chandelier to
hang below the octagonal dome in the chapel. (Figure 3.17) This
was called the Barbarossa chandelier, reflecting the emperor’s
nickname after his red beard; it was installed between 1165 and
1170 in honor of the Virgin Mary and as a tribute to
Charlemagne.
The chandelier’s forty-eight candles cast a tremendous spread
of
light in an age when artificial illumination was costly,
emphasizing
its association with earthly wealth and heavenly light.
As a continuation of the work undertaken by his grandfa-
ther Frederick I, which also included exhuming Charlemagne’s
bones, Frederick II (r. 1220-1250), following the plans Bar-
barossa had made, completed the creation of a lavish, new jew -
eled and gilded shrine for the remains of Charlemagne, seeking
to elevate him to the rank of sainthood. These statements in
rich material forms, imply the surpassing glory of their impe-
rial predecessor, shared by those who followed in his lineage.
Moreover, the associations of royalty and honor for earthly rul -
ers was often intertwined in very pointed ways to artwork asso-
ciated with the Christian God and saints. Notable in this regard
Figure 3.18 | Shrine of Charlemagne, Interior of palatine
chapel in Aachen Cathedral, Germany.
Author: User “ACBahn”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Figure 3.19 | Shrine of Charlemagne
Author: User “HOWI”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Figure 3.20 | Cross of Lothair
Author: CEphoto, Uwe Aranas
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Page | 87
INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART
is the shrine for Charlemagne—clearly a statement of imperial
power—made of rich materials that reflect popular Christian no-
tions of the Heavenly Jerusalem, where these saintly rulers were
thought to act as intercessors for the believer. (Figures 3.18 and
3.19) Often such imperial works actually featured objects or
sig-
nificant decorative details from imperial Roman works, such as
the antique cameo of the Roman Emperor Augustus that was
applied to the Cross of the Emperor Lothair II. (Figures 3.20
and 3.21) The gilded cross, dated to c. 1000, is covered with
102
gemstones and thirty-two pearls
and has a rock crystal seal near
its base bearing a portrait of Lo-
thair II (r. 835-869). Including
the portraits of earlier emperors
further emphasized the wealth
and power of the ruler who had it made, believed to be Otto III
(r. 983-1002). In addition, gemstones on such devotional works
were selected for their qualities associated with healing, good
fortune, the ability to ward off evil, and their mystical translu-
cence, that fostered spiritual illumination.
3.5 LIQUIDATION OF TREASURES
Works such as these
often implied the stor-
ing of riches as heav-
enly treasure and also
represented a means of
storing material wealth
that could be used for
mundane purposes in
time of need. We have records of a number of extrav-
agant shrines and liturgical (relating to worship) fur-
nishings that have not survived because they were tak-
en apart and sold to feed a famine-stricken community
or to provide for a new building project or an updated
expression of devotion. Such works as the sumptuous
Screen of Charlemagne (Figure 3.22) and the enormous
Stavelot Altarpiece (Figure 3.23) are known to us only
from drawings and small fragments that remain from
the original objects. The disappearances of such works
Figure 3.21 | Augustus cameo
Author: User “Absalypson2”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Figure 3.22 | Screen of
Charlemagne
Artist: Piersac
Source: www.medart.pitt.edu
License: Public Domain
Figure 3.23 | The mid-12th-century
silver altar piece surrounding the
shrine of Saint Remaclus
Author: User “Kleon3”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: Public Domain
CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED
IN ART
Page | 88
INTRODUCTION TO ART
indicate that their rich material components, while once
intrinsic to their great spiritual impli-
cations, at some point came to be seen as an important source of
wealth that could be put to
other use.
3.6 WOOD, INLAY, AND LACQUER
Sculptures, objects, and architectural components of wood were
also fashioned with a view
to their monetary and cultural value. Some varieties of wood are
more rare, others have qualities
that make them easier to work in certain types of process, and
there have been waves of “fashion”
in wood choices at many eras. For example, lindenwood and
limewood are associated with the
Middle Ages, mahogany with eighteenth-century England and
Scotland, oak with the Arts and
Crafts work of the mid-nineteenth to early twentieth centuries,
and delicately lacquered wooden
goods with Yuan Dynasty China.
Wooden sculpture was a far more predominant art form than
painting in northern Europe
during the Romanesque (c. 1000-1200) and Gothic periods (c.
1200-1500) in that region.
The material favored was lindenwood or limewood due to the
fineness of the wood’s grain,
which allowed the sculptor to carve intricate detail. Generally,
the sculpture was then poly-
chromed, or painted, to increase the lifelike quality of the
figure. Suggesting that spark of
life was important in works such as The Throne of Wisdom
because Mary, the compassionate
and merciful Mother of God and Queen of Heaven, was believed
to have the power to inter-
cede with her Son, the infant Christ, on behalf of the
faithful. (Figure 3.24)
Mahogany was discovered as a marketable wood by
European explorers and traders in the Caribbean islands,
Central America, and South America by the seventeenth
century. The naturally reddish-brown wood was prized for
its beauty and strength and, throughout the 1700s, was fre-
quently used in England and Scotland to create fine furni -
ture for the market there and in the American colonies. A
table such as this was a status symbol indicating the own-
er’s wealth and taste, which was further enhanced by its
use: this was not a utilitarian piece but a display table for
chinaware. (Figure 3.25)
The Arts and Crafts movement began in England in
the middle of the nineteenth century, but quickly spread
throughout Europe and to the United States. In a time
of growing industrialization, with an ever greater num-
ber of people moving to urban areas, working in facto-
ries, and consuming machine-made goods, some felt the
need to reclaim the handmade. With romantic associa-
tions of simpler times, greater authenticity, and individ-
Figure 3.24 | Throne of Wisdom
Author: User “Okapi07”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Page | 89
INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART
ual labor, furniture and decorative
objects made as part of the Arts and
Crafts movement were prized for
their workmanship, design based
on forms from nature, and respect
for the natural materials used. For
example, this cabinet is thought to
have been made by Daniel Pabst
(1826-1910, Germany, lived United
States), one of the leading furniture
makers of his day. It features elab-
orately carved surfaces and inlay,
where one material is cut and fit into
another in complex patterns. (Fig-
ures 3.26 and 3.27) Although the
types of wood used—walnut, maple,
and white pine—are not exotic or ra-
re, the mastery with which they have
been painstakingly cut and applied conveys a sense of
preciousness. Inlay techniques were of-
ten used to provide visual contrast and to emphasize both the
distinctive and diverse qualities
among the materials brought together and the refined
craftsmanship involved. A piece of furni-
ture made with such skill was prized for its singularity and for
the intricacy of the craft involved
in its creation.
Lacquer has been
used in art through-
out Asia since Neolithic
times, but carved lacquer
is created in China only.
Lacquer is resin from
trees found in continen-
tal Asia that hardens to
a natural plastic when
exposed to the air; it is
resistant to water and du-
rable. The base of a lac-
quered object is wood, to
which the liquid resin is
applied in up to 200 lay-
ers. This tray was made
in the fourteenth century,
during the Yuan Dynasty,
Figure 3.25 | China table
Source: Met Museum
License: OASC
Figure 3.26 | Cabinet
Artist: Daniel Pabst
Source: Met Museum
License: OASC
Figure 3.27 | Detail of Cabinet
Artist: Daniel Pabst
Source: Met Museum
License: OASC
CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED
IN ART
Page | 90
INTRODUCTION TO ART
when lacquer was most often tinted red by add-
ing cinnabar, powdered mercury sulfide. (Figure
3.28) Once hardened, the lacquer was carved
away to create detailed scenes of court life, such
as we see here, floral motifs, nature scenes, drag-
ons or abstracted patterns. While the resin itself
is of little monetary value, the laborious process
and high level of skill required for such delicate
carving meant the completed objects had, and
still have, significant cultural value.
3.7 INTRINSIC VALUES AND
ENHANCED WORTH OF METALS
Some of the materials prized by artists and
patrons become more valuable because of these
artistic uses; others are valuable for their intrin-
sic worth as raw substance. From the earliest times, metals such
as gold, silver, iron, and copper
were used and traded in their natural states, as they came from
the earth. They were mixed
with other materials to create alloys, used for minting
coins and forming sculptural objects. Among the most
prominent metal materials first used for art were iron
and bronze; forging and casting them were among
the earliest complex artistic processes devised. Brass
(copper alloyed with tin, lead, and/or other metals)
and the harder, more durable bronze have been wide-
ly used for grand public monuments that have fine
detail, weather well, and can be hollow cast to reduce
the amount of metal used. (Figures 3.29 and 3.30).
Because forging and casting are complex and highly
skilled processes, a viewer should know that an object
made of this material was a significant statement for
the artist or patron to make, one involving consider-
able planning and staging to accomplish the work.
3.8 RARE MATERIALS AND
PROHIBITED USES
The economic and ecological factors involved in
some materials have sometimes moved consideration
of their use far beyond the discussion of artistic
Figure 3.28 | Tray with women and boys on a
garden terrace
Source: Met Museum
License: OASC
Figure 3.29 | Bronze statue of Buddha
Author: User “Dirk Beyer”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Page | 91
INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART
production. An example is work in ivory, especially
that obtained from elephants, although it was
also taken to use for sculpture from their kin, the
extinct mammoth, as well as from walruses and
other mammals. Its rarity and workability led to
its valuation for finely carved works, often for
aristocratic patrons and very special purposes,
such as the devotional objects (The Virgin and
Child, Unknown: http://collections.vam.ac.uk/
item/O166591/the-virgin-and-child-polyptych-
unknown/) and personal toilet articles (Attack on
the Castle of Love, Unknown: http://collections.
vam.ac.uk/item/O88416/attack-on-the-castle-
of-mirror-back-unknown/) that were popular
among the court ladies of the late Middle Ages.
Its exploitation has led to scarcity and, ultimately,
now threatens the very existence of elephants, since
they have been savagely hunted and their herds
decimated in the interest of profit. Consequently,
both the sale and purchase of ivory objects, even
those considered antiques and historical treasures, are now
widely boycotted in the interest of
preservation of the species.
3.9 MATERIAL CONNOTATIONS OF CLASS OR STATION
Other more mundane materials and appropriated components
might also have strong
political connotations that intensify the meaning of the artwork.
Korean artist Do Ho Su chose
and assembled military dog tags to create a larger-than-life
figural impression of an imperialistic
robe with a hollow core. It carries connotations of the political
strength of his native land being
built upon such things as the dehumanizing mandatory military
service he had performed, and
the relationships between individuals and the collectives they
form. (Some/One, Do Ho Suh:
https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna-
ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/
suh-inst-002.jpg; Some/One detail, Do Ho Suh:
https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.
netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-
001.540.jpg)
3.10 BEFORE YOU MOVE ON
Key Concepts
One of the basic artistic choices for any creation is the material
from which it will be made and
so should be an area for careful attention in our analysis of any
artwork. Deliberate choices can
also involve the pointed spurning of rich resources in favor of
humbler stuff, as in the robe created
Figure 3.30 | The Minute Man
Artist: Daniel Chester French
Author: User “Flying Jazz”
Source: Wikimedia Commons
License: Public Domain
http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O166591/the-virgin-and-child-
polyptych-unknown/
http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O166591/the-virgin-and-child-
polyptych-unknown/
http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O166591/the-virgin-and-child-
polyptych-unknown/
http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O88416/attack-on-the-castle-
of-mirror-back-unknown/
http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O88416/attack-on-the-castle-
of-mirror-back-unknown/
http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O88416/attack-on-the-castle-
of-mirror-back-unknown/
https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna-
ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-002.jpg
https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna-
ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-002.jpg
https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna-
ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-001.540.jpg
https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna-
ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-001.540.jpg
CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED
IN ART
Page | 92
INTRODUCTION TO ART
by Do Ho Su, and less refined surfaces, such as cardboard or
burlap for paintings; things that are
only more recently available than those traditionally used, like
plastics for sculpture, titanium for
architecture; and the technologically evolved media that move
into the realms of the physically
immaterial. Choices and implications have expanded
exponentially, and our examination of them
should be broad, deep, and careful.
Test Yourself
1. Discuss the differences between materials that are
intrinsically precious, and those that are
made more valuable by the processes or creative ideas in works
of art, by considering specific
examples.
2. Consider the use of spolia in at least three specific examples
and discuss how they changed the
significance of the art work to which they were applied.
3. Review and describe a specific process for creating artwork
that involved procedures for
combining diverse materials into the product.
4. Considering such common materials as clay or wood, discuss
the ways in which an artist might
use it for making an object of much greater value than the
inherent worth, and what factors,
other than the creation process, might lead people to value it
highly.
3.11 KEY TERMS
Codex: the book form in which pages (or leaves) of material
such as parchment, vellum, or paper,
are gathered into bundles and bound together—initially by
sewing, now usually by glueing—
and then provided with a cover to protect the sheets. Its
ancestor was the scroll, in which the
sheets were joined into a long continuous roll that was opened
out from one side, rolled up at
the other, for viewing the contents.
Cultural value: the perceived quality or merit of the work: what
it is worth according to that
culture’s standards of artistic importance or excellence.
Earthenware, or objects made from clay: such as vessels that are
formed for specific uses and
hardened either by drying in the air or by baking in high heat.
Often, earthenware goods
are distinguished from more refined clay-based objects that are
creating with additional
processing of the material or different/more complex firing
methods. See porcelain
Gold leaf: 22K gold pounded into extremely thin sheets, to be
applied selectively to areas of 2-d
or 3-d objects.
Handbuilt: clay objects that are shaped by hand, often by
wrapping and smoothing coils of clay
into the desired form. These are distinguished from wheel -
thrown or mold-made goods.
Page | 93
INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART
Illumination: literally, given light, specifically through the use
of gold or silver for letting of
illustrative touches in a manuscript. The term is also sometime
used to describe manuscripts
that have images added to them, as opposed to simply includi ng
lettered text
Manuscript: literally, hand-written presentation of script and/or
images. The form was
supplanted by books produced with a printing press, although
the term is still used for a
singular copy of a written work.
Mausolea, plural of mausoleum: a building designed to house
one or more tombs, usually
for an important person. These were most often centrally-
planned, with a design that
pivoted around the burial site. In Christian usage, these were
sometimes attached to a larger,
congregational structure, but sometimes stood alone. They
might house more than one tomb.
Monetary value: the worth of materials or objects, in terms of
“market value.” This might be
determined by the value of the materials use or of the finished
art object, considered differently
from the cost of the materials.
Parchment: sheepskin, prepared for use in manuscripts—less
refined than vellum, used for
finer and more expensive works.
Polychrome: painted in several colors.
Porcelain: highly refined ceramic ware, initially produced in
China, with select materials like
petuntse and kaolin, to create semi-translucent material, with
elegant shapes, and glass-like,
intricately decorated surfaces, and high-temp fired for hardened
finishes.
Potter’s wheel, wheel-thrown: pottery made with the use of a
potter’s wheel, a device for
turning the clay body on a rotating platform for a more uniform
shape. These were first turned
by hand, knee, or pedal motion, later electrified.
Putti plural of putto: a small winged baby angel, a cherub.
Spolia: bounty taken from and original context, as in the “spoils
of war.” Often, items of spolia
were re-used in later works to imply the conquest (and
superiority) of the new owner over the
original.
Vellum: calfskin, prepared for use in luxury manuscripts, more
highly prized than the rougher,
less expensive parchment.
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 1 of 34
CITY OF GLENDALE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
“GLENDALE-BURBANK REGIONAL STREETCAR
FEASIBILITY STUDY”
To: All Qualified Firms
Date: July 31, 2017
Subject: Request for Proposals for City of Glendale: Glendale –
Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
DUE DATE: Ten (10) hard copies and five (5) electronic copies
on CDs responding to the Re-
quest for Proposals are to be submitted to:
Fred Zohrehvand
Senior Transportation Planner
City of Glendale
633 E. Broadway, Room 300
Glendale, CA 91206
By 5:00 pm on August 22, 2017.
Proposals received after this date and time will not be
considered.
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 2 of 34
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Schedule of Events
...............................................................................................
................. 6
II. Explanation of the Project
...............................................................................................
..... 6
III. Project Background
...............................................................................................
.............. 6
IV. City of Glendale Background
..............................................................................................
7
V. Project Scope of
Work............................................................. .........................
.................... 8
VI. Instructions to Proposer
...............................................................................................
.... 15
VII. DBE Requirements
...............................................................................................
............ 18
VIII. Evaluation & Selection
...............................................................................................
..... 18
IX. Response to RFP – Formatting & Contents
..................................................................... 19
X. Appendix
...............................................................................................
.............................. 22
Submittal Forms
...............................................................................................
....................... 23
Attachments
...............................................................................................
............................. 34
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 3 of 34
NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS
NOTICE is hereby given that the City of Glendale (“City”) will
receive Proposals until the dead-
line established below for the following project:
Glendale – Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study
Proposal Submittal Deadline: Submit before 5:00 p.m. on
August 22, 2017
Proposal Submittal Location: 633 E. Broadway, Room 300,
Glendale, CA 91206
NO LATE PROPOSALS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
City of Glendale Contact Person for RFP Process:
Ms. Arezoo Kamali
Planning Assistant
Phone: (818) 937-8333
Email: [email protected]
Project Description:
For the past several years there have been discussions on the
concept of developing a street-
car system in Downtown Glendale. Earlier streetcar concepts
were discussed or evaluated by
the Greater Downtown Strategic Plan (1996) and the Downtown
Mobility Study (2007).
A streetcar in Glendale has the potential to connect the various
shopping, dining, entertain-
ment and parking components of the Downtown area, and
perhaps neighboring cities and
other mass transit services. Streetcar systems also attract
tourism, and visitors to Glendale
will be able to utilize the streetcar to patronize business
throughout the Downtown business
district. Finally, we have the ability to establish connectivity
among our various transportation
modes by linking the streetcar to the Beeline and the Larry
Zarian Transportation Center to
develop a more effective and comprehensive transit system. The
City of Glendale hopes to
continue to provide the infrastructure and resources necessary
for residents to incorporate
transit oriented lifestyles into their daily lives, and become part
of healthier communities.
The feasibility study required to move forward with any
streetcar concept would include:
• Evaluate different route alignments and technologies for the
streetcar;
• Analyze Downtown Glendale infrastructure to determine its
ability to accommodate a
streetcar system; and if necessary,
• Determine the infrastructure improvements needed to
construct the system;
• Determine what types of vehicles are obtainable and
appropriate;
• Establish how a streetcar system can be implemented;
• Project potential streetcar ridership and revenues;
• Predict traffic impacts;
• Forecast impacts on Downtown Glendale businesses; and
• Determine the overall cost of the project, including:
• The various equipment options
• Infrastructure improvements (tracks, street improvements)
• Maintenance and Operating Costs
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 4 of 34
Other Proposal Information:
1. Request for Proposal Documents may be obtained in the City
of Glendale
Community Development Department, Urban Design and
Mobility Division, lo-
cated at 633 East Broadway, Room 300, Glendale, CA, 91206,
or via email or
mail at the request of consultants without any cost.
2. Acceptance or Rejection of Proposals. The City reserves the
right to reject
any and all Proposals, and to waive any informalities,
irregularities or technical
defects in such proposals and determine the lowest responsible
proposer,
whichever may be in the best interests of the City. No late
proposals will be ac-
cepted, nor will any oral, facsimile or electronic proposals be
accepted by the
City.
3. Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference. August 9, 2017 2:30pm-
4:00pm at 633
E. Broadway, Room 105, Glendale, CA 91206.
4. Race Conscious (RC)/DBE Participation. [NOTE: The
following mandatory
requirement applies ONLY to the Glendale – Burbank Regional
Streetcar
Feasibility Study contract.
The U.S. Dept. of Transportation Regulations found
that 49 CFR Part 26 shall
apply to this contract. A disadvantaged business enterprise
(“DBE”) contract
goal of 10% goal has been established for this project. This
goal must be met or
good faith efforts to meet this goal must be demonstrated in
order for a proposal
to be considered responsive. The Consultant or subcontractor
shall not discrimi-
nate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the
performance of this
contract. The consultant shall carry out applicable requirements
of 49 CFR, Part
26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts.
Failure by the
consultant to carry out these requirements is a material breach
of this contract,
which may result in the termination of this contract or such
other remedy, as re-
cipient deems appropriate. To assist consultants in
ascertaining RC/DBE
availability for specific items of work, the City has determined
that RC/DBE
could reasonably be expected to compete for subcontracting
opportunities
on this project, and their likely availability for work on this
project is 10%
Race Conscious RC/DBE.
It is the proposer’s responsibility to verify that the RC/DBE’s
fall into one of
the following groups in order to count towards the RC/DBE
contract goal:
1) Black American; 2) Asian-Pacific American; 3) Native
American; 4) Wom-
en; 5) Hispanic American; 6) Subcontinent Asian Pacific
American and any
other groups whose members are certified as socially and
economically
disadvantaged. Proposers are required to submit the Local
Agency Pro-
posal RC/DBE Commitment, “Exhibit 15-G” and the Good Faith
Efforts,
“Exhibit 15-H” forms form along with the proposal submittal.
If the RC/DBE
Commitment forms are not submitted with the proposal, the
apparent low
proposer, the 2nd low proposer, and the 3rd low proposer must
complete
and submit the RC/DBE Commitment forms (Exhibits 15-G and
15-H) to the
City. Submittal of only the “Local Agency Proposer RC/DBE
Commitment” form
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 5 of 34
may not provide sufficient documentation to demonstrate that
adequate good
faith efforts were made.
For a list of RC/DBE’s certified by the California Unified
Certification Pro-
gram, go to: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/bep/find_certified.h tm
Dated this ______ day of _____________, 2017, City of
Glendale, California.
Ardashes Kassakhian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale.
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 6 of 34
Definition of Terms
The following terms used in the RFP documents shall be
construed as follows:
“City” shall mean the City of Glendale.
“Agreement” shall be considered synonymous with the term
“Contract.”
“Proposer” shall mean the individual, partnership, corporation
or other entity who responds to
the RFP.
“Consultant” shall mean the individual, partnership, corporation
or other entity to which an
agreement is awarded.
“Days” shall mean the business days recognized by City of
Glendale.
I. Schedule of Events
Event Date
Request for Proposals (RFP) Issued July 31, 2017
Mandatory Pre-Proposal Meeting August 9, 2017
Deadline for Written Questions and Requests August 15, 2017
Responses and Addenda Issued August 15, 2017
Technical and Price Proposals Due August 22, 1017; 5:00pm
Interview Firms (TBD based on City review of written proposal)
Early September 2017
Proposed Approval of Selected Consultant(s) by City Council
Early-Mid September 2017
Notice to Proceed / Service Contract Begins / Kick-Off Meeting
Late October 2017
Project Completion Date (8-12) mos. after start of contract)
Summer 2018
City of Glendale reserves the right to alter any of the dates
shown above by written notice.
Submit any inquiries via email to Ms. Arezoo Kamali, Planning
Assistant at
[email protected] No phone calls please.
II. Explanation of the Project
The purpose of this RFP is to:
1) Obtain the services of a well-qualified project team led by a
single consultant/firm, or a
consultant team with experienced sub-consultants who are
experts in their respective
fields, to develop a Streetcar Feasibility Study concentrating in
the City of Glendale with
optional tasks D1 & D2.
III. Project Background
Streetcars have been an integral part of the history of the City
of Glendale. Streetcar
systems such as the Pacific Electric and Glendale & Montrose
Railway Company operated
within the boundaries of modern-day Glendale from 1904
to1956.
Recently, many cities have installed streetcar systems as part of
larger successful
redevelopment projects. These cities have observed formerly
blighted areas turn
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 7 of 34
prosperous; property values increase and cultural resources
enhance in the vicinity of newly
installed streetcar systems. This benefit is in addition to the
gains in transit services provided
by the streetcar system for these cities.
It is the City’s goal to develop a streetcar system that can create
connectivity linking the
various shopping, dining, entertainment, and parking resources
of downtown Glendale with
the region via the Larry Zarian Transportation Center and the
Hollywood Burbank Airport. A
successful streetcar system can also attract tourism and visitors
to the city increasing
commerce for Downtown Glendale businesses.
IV. City of Glendale Background
The City of Glendale is located at the eastern end
of the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles Coun-
ty, at the southern base of the Verdugo Moun-
tains.
Glendale is bordered to the northwest by the
Tujunga neighborhood of Los Angeles, to the
northeast by La Canada Flintridge and the unin-
corporated area of La Crescenta, to the west by
Burbank, to the east by Pasadena and to the
south and southeast by the City of Los Angeles.
Glendale is also defined by the 210, 2, 134, and
5 freeways.
Glendale is a diverse, multilingual city of 191,719
residents (US Census Bureau 2010). Its business
community, from manufacturing to financial ser-
vices, employs nearly 100,000 people at more
than 6,800 firms (US Census Bureau 2007).
The area’s mobility network is well-connected by
public transportation, including Metrolink and Amtrak service
at the Glendale Transportation
Center in South Glendale, by Metro Rapid and Local buses, and
by the Glendale Beeline bus
service.
For purposes of long-range planning, Glendale is divided into
four community planning areas,
as described below:
North Glendale Community Plan
The community of North Glendale lies within the Crescenta
Valley, which is clearly defined by
the San Gabriel and Verdugo Mountains. The Crescenta Valley
has a variety of neighbor-
hood‐ oriented village centers and commercial districts,
including the Sparr Heights Business
District, Verdugo City and the suburban corridor of Foothill
Boulevard. The most intense of
these is the “town center” surrounding the vibrant, popular, and
highly walkable Montrose Shop-
ping Park. The North Glendale Community Plan was adopted by
City Council in November
2011; the document is provided in the Appendix.
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 8 of 34
South Glendale Community Plan
South Glendale includes Downtown Glendale, which
is served by three public parking structures and ten
parking lots, and has experienced significant growth in
high-density mixed-use commercial and residential
buildings since the adoption of the Downtown Specific
Plan (2006) and the Downtown Mobility Study (2007).
Just south of downtown is the Brand Boulevard of
Cars, which contains a regional concentration of auto
dealerships, and the Tropico town site, the city’s his-
toric industrial base and a burgeoning mixed-use and
residential neighborhood around the Larry Zarian
Transportation Center. The South Glendale Communi-
ty Plan is currently in development and its adoption is
anticipated in early 2018.
East & West Glendale Community Plan
East Glendale includes hillside residential neighbor-
hoods and neighborhood-serving commercial areas,
and features Glendale Community College; this com-
munity abuts the City of Pasadena. West Glendale
includes hillside residential neighborhoods, commercial, and
industrial districts; it features the
Kenneth Village shopping area, the Walt Disney Company’s
Grand Central Creative Campus,
DreamWorks Animation studios, the Glendale Narrows
Riverwalk along the Los Angeles River,
and abuts the City of Burbank. Development of community
plans for East and West Glendale
will begin following the adoption of the South Glendale
Community Plan.
V. Project Scope of Work
Scope of Work – Glendale-Burbank Regional Streetcar
Feasibility Study
In developing the Glendale-Burbank Regional Streetcar
Feasibility Study, the Consultant shall
comply with all applicable local, State of California Department
of Transportation (Caltrans), and
federal facility design guidelines and requirements.
The Scope of Work consists of the following tasks:
Task A - PROJECT SETTING
1. Statement of Project Purpose and Function
This task will focus on developing a statement of purpose and
function for reintroducing
streetcar service to the city of Glendale. Specific elements
include:
will help guide the
development of the
statement of project purpose
redevelopment sites
potentially served by a streetcar through South and West
Glendale and into the
neighboring city of Burbank
adoption (see Task A-4)
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 9 of 34
2. Technology Option Review
type of streetcar
technology available to the City
examples and in
light of the project’s statement of purpose
3. Existing Conditions Review
This task will provide the narrative context for the study
ding
geography, de-
mographics, and economics
and their status
policies, and goals
f the project report
4. Selection of Preferred Technology and Alignment
Alternatives - Workshop and
Report
This task will include organization and conducting a workshop
with selected staff and the
City Council to develop consensus on the option or options to
be carried forward for fur-
ther study.
consensus regarding the
draft Statement of Project Purpose and Function; and on
determining alignment
alternatives and identifying minimum operating segments for
each alternative,
and confirming technology option(s) for further study
5. Concept Evaluation Report, Including Geodata
In light of the project purpose, and for the preferred technology
and alignment alterna-
tives, an evaluation will be conducted of how a streetcar would
be introduced into the
transportation environment and streetscape. Specific elements
include:
efine design concepts including intersection and
lane configurations,
impacts on adjacent properties, access constraints and parking
impacts
tions for challenged intersections
-O-W inventory and analysis
aerial photography us-
ing existing public & commercial sources wherever possible
6. Vehicles Review
Identify and describe the range of vehicle types that are
available for use in Glendale.
Specific elements include:
disadvantages, of the range of
vehicle types available
applicable government re-
quirements
opera-
tions/maintenance requirements
r Glendale
streetcar
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 10 of 34
7. Preliminary Cost Estimates
For the alignment alternatives identified in Task A-11, the
order-of-magnitude capital and
operating cost estimates will be refined. Specific elements
include:
frequency, run times,
annual hours and fleet requirements
minimum operating
segment in each alternative
operating segment in each
alternative
preliminary capital cost esti-
mate for each alternative
8. Ridership Analysis
Develop an estimate of ridership for each alternative utilizing
an “off-line” modeling tech-
nique. Specific elements include:
-line” modeling process
travel demand within
project area
alignment
-line” spreadsheet model to produce patronage
estimates for each
alternative
9. Preliminary Traffic Analysis
traffic conditions need to
be evaluated along the corridor with respect to streetcar
alternatives
to traffic conditions,
and the effects of traffic on streetcar operations
a conceptual level parking
analysis, and recom-
mendations for further engineering design and traffic study
10. Funding Sources Report
Refine the listing of funding sources to support the capital and
operating cost require-
ments of each alternative’s minimum operating segment.
Specific elements include:
be available to ap-
ply to streetcar project
f potential Federal funding
sources
identified source of fund-
ing and the level of revenues each source could provide.
11. Illustrated Route Concepts and Design Report
Refine system and alignment alternatives, including
identification of a minimum operat-
ing segment for each potential alignment. Specific elements
include:
fine the candidate system alignment(s)
recommend a pre-
ferred alternative for further evaluation.
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 11 of 34
for the preferred al-
ternative
drawings, cross-
sections and sketches
12. MEETINGS, PRESENTATIONS and MANAGEMENT
The Consultant will attend a start-up meeting in tandem with
the notice to proceed, at
which the City and the Consultant will finalize the scope of
work and project schedule.
Deliverables:
As requested, the consultant team will attend project related
meetings and presenta-
tions. Specific elements include:
Transportation & Parking
Commission (TPC), City Council and community meetings
coordination with the City
and with sub consultants.
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 12 of 34
TASK B – PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT
1. Impact Assessment
Impacts not addressed during conceptual design development
will be identified and dealt
with. Specific elements include:
from the ridership
projections for the preferred alternative
g the design phase
issues
2. Traffic Analysis
-of-service (LOS) calculations for each
intersection along
the preferred alternative
affect operations
proposed road-
way/signal changes for the preferred alternative. This is a
planning level LOS
analysis and will not estimate traffic diversion or incorporate
detailed signal oper-
ations analysis in this task.
impacts (e.g. through
changing intersection configuration, signal operations,
implementing transit signal
priority, etc.)
3. Transit Interface Report
Identify the positive and negative impacts a streetcar service
would have on existing and
planned transit services in Glendale. Specific elements include:
transit service within
the project area.
4. Active Transportation & First/Last Mile Interface
Identify opportunities to improve first last/mile connection in
light of existing and planned
bicycle and pedestrian facilities to streetcar service in Glendale.
Specific elements in-
clude:
fy existing “Pathways” around proposed station
locations consistent with the
Metro First Last Mile Strategic Plan methodology, and note
potential areas of
conflict between a streetcar and non-motorized travel modes
ransportation
connectivity and access
around proposed station locations
5. Operations Plan
A final Operations Plan for the preferred alternative will be
developed. Specific elements
include:
day and
service frequency
revenue vehicle
miles and number of vehicles required
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 13 of 34
6. Capital Costs Estimate
A final capital cost estimate reflecting the preferred alternative
will be developed. Specif-
ic elements include:
Task A-7 estimates
were produced
elements
7. Operating & Maintenance Costs Estimate
Prepare a final operating and maintenance cost estimate
reflecting the final Operations
Plan including:
estimates developed
in Task A-7
a revised estimate reflecting the final Operations
Plan (Task B-5)
Task C – IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
1. Phasing Plan
Identify the steps and milestones required to advance from the
current feasibility study to
project implementation. Specific elements include:
Federal (FTA)
funded project and a non-federalized project
es
2. Programming Strategies Report
Identify the required local, regional, state and Federal approvals
and clearances required
for project implementation. Specific elements include:
y federal, state, regional and local regulations
applicable to a streetcar op-
eration and the steps necessary to address each
required
inances
or adopted plans
report
3. Public Outreach Plan
Develop an outline for a public outreach plan for the various
phases to project opening.
Specific elements include:
c outreach and education program outline
required for a suc-
cessful public outreach program
4. Land Use & Zoning Analysis
design guidelines,
within the project area in light of Metro guidance and best
practices relative to
transit corridors and Transit-Oriented Development
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 14 of 34
design guideline
policies to focus new growth within the project area, support
streetcar ridership,
and help achieve regional GHG/VMT reduction goals
5. Funding Plan
Prepare a Funding Plan for the Glendale streetcar system.
Specific elements include:
get to the anticipated year of expenditure
dollars
the capital and O&M
costs
funding sources
on of the project report
Task D: Add Alternatives
The City requests that proposers provide the following tasks as
optional “add alternatives” to the
project scope that the City may pursue if desired:
1. City of Burbank Streetcar Alignment
A detailed study of the proposed streetcar system within the
City of Burbank, including,
but not limited to:
• Alternative alignments connecting from the City of Glendale
serving the Down-
town Area of the City of Burbank, Media District, Hollywood
Burbank Airport, and
other points of interest within the City of Burbank.
• This optional task to determine alternative alignments to serve
the City of Bur-
bank shall be the same Scope of Work that was identified for
the City of Glendale
portion of the Study: Task A – Project Setting; Task B –
Preferred Option As-
sessment; and Task C – Implementation Strategy.
2. Personal Rapid Transit (PRT)
An evaluation of Personal Rapid Transit as a technology both
alternative and in
addition to a streetcar system in Glendale.
extant or
demonstration systems
operating
PRT in Downtown Glendale
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 15 of 34
VI. Instructions to Proposer
Compliance with Applicable Guidelines and Regulations
Consultants are required to comply with all applicable State of
California guidelines and regula-
tions regarding the Streetcar Feasibility Study.
Late Proposals
All proposals, as well as any modifications, received at this
office after the hour and date speci-
fied will not be considered unless they are sent by certified
mail, for which an official, dated post
office stamp has been obtained, and it is determined by the
City’s Project Manager that the late
receipt was due solely to delay in the mail.
Disclaimers
The City reserves the right to extend the time allotted for the
RFP submittal, to interview the
Proposer in person, and to request a best and final offer, should
the City deem that it is in its
best interest to do so. This RFP does not commit the City to
award a contract, or to pay any
costs incurred in its preparation. The City reserves the right to
accept or reject any or all RFPs
received as a result of this request, to negotiate with any
qualified firm, or to cancel this RFP in
part or in its entirety. The City may require the selected firm to
participate in negotiations and to
submit such technical, price, or other revisions of their
proposals as may result from negotia-
tions. Any costs incurred by the Proposer in responding to this
Request for Proposals shall be
the Proposer’s sole expense and will not be reimbursed by the
City.
Proprietary Information; Public Records Act
The City seeks to conduct its business openly. Upon
recommendation for award of Contract to
the City Council, all Proposal Documents shall become a matter
of public record and shall be
regarded as public, with the exception of those elements of each
Proposal that are identified by
the Consultant and plainly marked as “trade secret,”
“confidential,” or “proprietary”. Each ele-
ment of a Proposal which a Consultant desires not to be
considered a public record must be
clearly marked as set forth above, and any blanket statement
(i.e. regarding entire pages, doc-
uments, or other, non-specific designations) shall not be
sufficient and shall not bind the City in
any way whatsoever. If City receives a request from a third
party to make a Proposal available
for inspection and copying, the City will notify the Consultant
of the request. If a Consultant in-
structs the City that the information is not to be released, City
will withhold the information, pro-
vided, the Consultant expeditiously seeks a protective order to
prevent such release. If disclo-
sure is required under the California Public Records Act or
otherwise by law (despite the Con-
sultant’s request for confidentiality), the City shall not in any
way be liable or responsible for the
disclosure of any such records or part thereof.
Consultant shall indemnify, defend (including Consultant
providing and paying for legal counsel
for the City), and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents,
employees and representatives
from and against any liability, claims, suits, demands, damages,
fines, penalties, costs, or ex-
penses arising out of or alleging the City’s refusal to publicly
disclose one or more records that
Consultant identifies as protectable, or asserts is protectable.
Agreement
Once selected, the successful Proposer must enter into a written
Agreement with the CITY with-
in fourteen (14) calendar days following Proposer’s receiving
the CITY’s Notice of Intent to
Award Contract.
Before any services can commence, the selected Proposer will
be required to execute the
Standard Form of Agreement, a sample of which is attached
here and alternately referred to as
City of Glendale
___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Page 16 of 34
“Professional Services Agreement.” To facilitate the project’s
smooth and timely implementation,
Proposers responding to this RFP shall review all the terms and
conditions of the Standard
Form of Agreement including, but not limited to, provisions
relating to insurance, indemnity, and
termination.
The CITY’s policy is that the Standard Form of Agreement be
accepted as is. By submitting a
Proposal to the CITY in response to this RFP, each Proposer is
deemed to have provided its
approval to the Standard Form of Agreement, accepting it
without qualification. If a Proposer
seeks limited modification of the Standard Form of Agreement,
then in the Proposal a Proposer
must identify the proposed changes.
However, changes or qualifications to the Standard Form of
Agreement may be weighed in the
evaluation of the Proposal and may cause rejection of the
proposal as non-responsive, in
CITY’s determination.
Insurance Requirements
Based on the Scope of Work, insurance is required for the
following coverages:
• Professional Liability Insurance
• Workers’ Compensation Insurance
• Commercial General Liability or Business owners Liability
Insurance
• Business Automobile Liability Insurance
The City’s specific insurance requirements are included in the
Appendix to this RFP, as are
sample Professional Services Agreements (PSAs) for 1)
consultants who are not Architects,
Landscape Architects, Professional Engineers, or Professional
Land Surveyors and 2) consult-
ants who ARE licensed professionals in the aforementioned
fields.
Requests for Clarification
A Proposer with questions may submit to the City a written
Request for Clarification by email to
Ms. Arezoo Kamali, Planning Assistant at [email protected] for
an interpretation or
clarification of, or addenda to, this RFP. Any such request must
be received by the City no later
than the date and time specified in Section I. Schedule of
Events in this RFP. The City will re-
view and prepare a written response to each request made
pursuant to this section. The City's
determination will be furnished to all Proposers by the date
specified in Section I. Schedule of
Events in this RFP.
The City reserves the right to modify or issue addenda to this
RFP. If the City determines it ap-
propriate to revise any portion of this RFP, either at the request
of a Proposer or upon the City’s
own initiative, the City will issue, and make available to all
prospective Proposers, a written ad-
dendum setting forth this revision. Proposer shall acknowledge
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ
!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ

More Related Content

More from SilvaGraf83

1 Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinica
1  Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinica1  Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinica
1 Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinica
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Green Book Film Analysis Sugiarto Mulj
1  Green Book Film Analysis  Sugiarto Mulj1  Green Book Film Analysis  Sugiarto Mulj
1 Green Book Film Analysis Sugiarto Mulj
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Film Essay 1 Film from 1940-1970
1  Film Essay 1 Film from 1940-1970 1  Film Essay 1 Film from 1940-1970
1 Film Essay 1 Film from 1940-1970
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Ch
1  Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Ch1  Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Ch
1 Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Ch
SilvaGraf83
 
1 FIN 2063 INSURANCE FINANCIAL PLANNING Case As
1  FIN 2063 INSURANCE FINANCIAL PLANNING Case As1  FIN 2063 INSURANCE FINANCIAL PLANNING Case As
1 FIN 2063 INSURANCE FINANCIAL PLANNING Case As
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computi
1  Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computi1  Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computi
1 Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computi
SilvaGraf83
 
1 EARLY C
1  EARLY C1  EARLY C
1 EARLY C
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Case Grading Procedure Your grade from each case
1  Case Grading Procedure Your grade from each case 1  Case Grading Procedure Your grade from each case
1 Case Grading Procedure Your grade from each case
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Kilimanjaro is a snow-covered mountain 19,710 feet hi
1  Kilimanjaro is a snow-covered mountain 19,710 feet hi1  Kilimanjaro is a snow-covered mountain 19,710 feet hi
1 Kilimanjaro is a snow-covered mountain 19,710 feet hi
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Assignment 2 Winter 2022Problem 1 Assume yo
1  Assignment 2 Winter 2022Problem 1 Assume yo1  Assignment 2 Winter 2022Problem 1 Assume yo
1 Assignment 2 Winter 2022Problem 1 Assume yo
SilvaGraf83
 
1 COU 680 Adult Psychosocial Assessment Sabrina Da
1  COU 680 Adult Psychosocial Assessment Sabrina  Da1  COU 680 Adult Psychosocial Assessment Sabrina  Da
1 COU 680 Adult Psychosocial Assessment Sabrina Da
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Literature Review on How Biofilm Affect the
1  Literature Review on How Biofilm Affect the1  Literature Review on How Biofilm Affect the
1 Literature Review on How Biofilm Affect the
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Canterbury Tales (c. 12th century)
1  Canterbury Tales        (c. 12th century)  1  Canterbury Tales        (c. 12th century)
1 Canterbury Tales (c. 12th century)
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Math 140 Exam 2 COC Spring 2022 150 Points
1  Math 140 Exam 2 COC Spring 2022 150 Points  1  Math 140 Exam 2 COC Spring 2022 150 Points
1 Math 140 Exam 2 COC Spring 2022 150 Points
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Lessons from the past How the deadly second wave
1  Lessons from the past How the deadly second wave1  Lessons from the past How the deadly second wave
1 Lessons from the past How the deadly second wave
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Lockheed Martin Corporation Abdussamet Akca
1  Lockheed Martin Corporation Abdussamet Akca  1  Lockheed Martin Corporation Abdussamet Akca
1 Lockheed Martin Corporation Abdussamet Akca
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Lab 9 Comparison of Two Field Methods in a Scien
1  Lab 9 Comparison of Two Field Methods in a Scien1  Lab 9 Comparison of Two Field Methods in a Scien
1 Lab 9 Comparison of Two Field Methods in a Scien
SilvaGraf83
 
1 LAB MODULE 5 GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PATTERNS Note P
1  LAB MODULE 5 GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PATTERNS Note P1  LAB MODULE 5 GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PATTERNS Note P
1 LAB MODULE 5 GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PATTERNS Note P
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Instructions for Coming of Age in Mississippi
1  Instructions for Coming of  Age in Mississippi 1  Instructions for Coming of  Age in Mississippi
1 Instructions for Coming of Age in Mississippi
SilvaGraf83
 
1 Institutional Assessment Report 2012-13
1  Institutional Assessment Report 2012-13  1  Institutional Assessment Report 2012-13
1 Institutional Assessment Report 2012-13
SilvaGraf83
 

More from SilvaGraf83 (20)

1 Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinica
1  Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinica1  Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinica
1 Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinica
 
1 Green Book Film Analysis Sugiarto Mulj
1  Green Book Film Analysis  Sugiarto Mulj1  Green Book Film Analysis  Sugiarto Mulj
1 Green Book Film Analysis Sugiarto Mulj
 
1 Film Essay 1 Film from 1940-1970
1  Film Essay 1 Film from 1940-1970 1  Film Essay 1 Film from 1940-1970
1 Film Essay 1 Film from 1940-1970
 
1 Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Ch
1  Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Ch1  Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Ch
1 Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Ch
 
1 FIN 2063 INSURANCE FINANCIAL PLANNING Case As
1  FIN 2063 INSURANCE FINANCIAL PLANNING Case As1  FIN 2063 INSURANCE FINANCIAL PLANNING Case As
1 FIN 2063 INSURANCE FINANCIAL PLANNING Case As
 
1 Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computi
1  Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computi1  Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computi
1 Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computi
 
1 EARLY C
1  EARLY C1  EARLY C
1 EARLY C
 
1 Case Grading Procedure Your grade from each case
1  Case Grading Procedure Your grade from each case 1  Case Grading Procedure Your grade from each case
1 Case Grading Procedure Your grade from each case
 
1 Kilimanjaro is a snow-covered mountain 19,710 feet hi
1  Kilimanjaro is a snow-covered mountain 19,710 feet hi1  Kilimanjaro is a snow-covered mountain 19,710 feet hi
1 Kilimanjaro is a snow-covered mountain 19,710 feet hi
 
1 Assignment 2 Winter 2022Problem 1 Assume yo
1  Assignment 2 Winter 2022Problem 1 Assume yo1  Assignment 2 Winter 2022Problem 1 Assume yo
1 Assignment 2 Winter 2022Problem 1 Assume yo
 
1 COU 680 Adult Psychosocial Assessment Sabrina Da
1  COU 680 Adult Psychosocial Assessment Sabrina  Da1  COU 680 Adult Psychosocial Assessment Sabrina  Da
1 COU 680 Adult Psychosocial Assessment Sabrina Da
 
1 Literature Review on How Biofilm Affect the
1  Literature Review on How Biofilm Affect the1  Literature Review on How Biofilm Affect the
1 Literature Review on How Biofilm Affect the
 
1 Canterbury Tales (c. 12th century)
1  Canterbury Tales        (c. 12th century)  1  Canterbury Tales        (c. 12th century)
1 Canterbury Tales (c. 12th century)
 
1 Math 140 Exam 2 COC Spring 2022 150 Points
1  Math 140 Exam 2 COC Spring 2022 150 Points  1  Math 140 Exam 2 COC Spring 2022 150 Points
1 Math 140 Exam 2 COC Spring 2022 150 Points
 
1 Lessons from the past How the deadly second wave
1  Lessons from the past How the deadly second wave1  Lessons from the past How the deadly second wave
1 Lessons from the past How the deadly second wave
 
1 Lockheed Martin Corporation Abdussamet Akca
1  Lockheed Martin Corporation Abdussamet Akca  1  Lockheed Martin Corporation Abdussamet Akca
1 Lockheed Martin Corporation Abdussamet Akca
 
1 Lab 9 Comparison of Two Field Methods in a Scien
1  Lab 9 Comparison of Two Field Methods in a Scien1  Lab 9 Comparison of Two Field Methods in a Scien
1 Lab 9 Comparison of Two Field Methods in a Scien
 
1 LAB MODULE 5 GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PATTERNS Note P
1  LAB MODULE 5 GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PATTERNS Note P1  LAB MODULE 5 GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PATTERNS Note P
1 LAB MODULE 5 GLOBAL TEMPERATURE PATTERNS Note P
 
1 Instructions for Coming of Age in Mississippi
1  Instructions for Coming of  Age in Mississippi 1  Instructions for Coming of  Age in Mississippi
1 Instructions for Coming of Age in Mississippi
 
1 Institutional Assessment Report 2012-13
1  Institutional Assessment Report 2012-13  1  Institutional Assessment Report 2012-13
1 Institutional Assessment Report 2012-13
 

Recently uploaded

1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 

!!!!!DEPARTMENT!OF!PUBLIC!WORKS!!REQ

  • 2. RFP!ISSUED! SEPTEMBER!1,!2016! REQUEST!FOR!INFORMATION!DEADLINE:!5:00!PM! SEPTEMBER!27,!2016! RELEASE!OF!INFORMATION!REQUESTED! OCTOBER!3,!2016! PROPOSAL!DUE!DATE/SUBMISSION!DEADLINE:!5:00!PM! OCTOBER!10,!2016! AWARD!DATE! NOVEMBER!2016! APPROXIMATE!START!DATE! NOVEMBER/DECEMBER! 2016! 1! ! ! REQUEST!FOR!PROPOSALS! FOR!PROFESSIONAL!DESIGN!SERVICES! FOR!THE!DESIGN!OF! LAMBERT(PARK(PHASE(II((CIP(NO.(819)( Table!of!Contents! ! 1.0!OVERVIEW...................................................................... ............................................................2! 2.0!SCOPE!OF!SERVICES......................................................
  • 4. ! ! 1.0(Overview(( ! The!City!of!El!Monte!(the!City)!has!made!numerous!improvem ents!over!the!past!several!years! to!Lambert!Park.!These!improvements!have!been!made!possibl e!through!funds!awarded!to!the! City!from!Air!Quality!Management!District!(AQMD)!and!the! Conservation!Corp.!Improvements! completed! through! 2016! include:! 1)! Installation! of! Watershed! Gardens;! 2)! Installation! of! a! Permeable! Pavers! Plaza;! and! 3)! Installation! of! Picnic! Shelters;! 4)! Installation! of! passive! improvements! and! park! amenities! within! the! Watershed! Gardens;! and! 5)! Environmental! Testing! for! purposes! of! abating! and! demolishing! two! existing! buildings,! (maintenance! room/restrooms!and!youth!hut).!!! ! The!City!recently!commissioned!the!preparation!of!a!New!Con ceptual!Plan!for!Lambert!Park! and!this!plan!was!approved!by!City!Council!in!a!meeting!on!A ugust!2,!2016.!This!Conceptual! Plan!(See!Attachment!A!– !Lambert!Park!Master)!will!be!the!basis!for!future!improvemen ts!to! Lambert!Park.! ! The!City!of!El!Monte!(the!City)!is!soliciting!proposals!from!q ualified!and!experienced!proposers! to! secure! architectural! and! engineering! design! services! for! the! preparation! of! plans,!
  • 5. specifications,!and!cost!estimates!(PS&E)!and!related!construct ion!documents,!and!to!provide! construction! administration! services! during! the! construction! phase! for! the! LAMBERT! PARK! IMPROVEMENTS!PHASEc2!(CIP!NO.!819).!The!plans!and!co st!estimates!will!be!comprehensive! for! all! improvements! proposed! on! the! approved! Lambert! Park! Conceptual! Plan! (Refer! to! Attachment!“A”).!It!is!the!intent!to!have!a!complete!set!of!pla ns!and!phase!construction!using! remaining!funds!from!the!AQMD!Grant!and!construct!improve ments!when!funding!is!available.! The!Design!Project!is!to!be!funded!using!funds!awarded!to!the !City!of!El!Monte.!This!project!is! subject!to!state!and!federal!regulations!and!procurement!requir ements.!! ! At! the! of! release! of! this! RFP! The! City! has! approximately! $900,000! remaining! on! the! AQMD! grant!and!is!seeking!future!funding!from!Los!Angeles!County! for!construction!of!improvements! and! new! fields.! At! this! time! the! City! desires! to! develop! a! comprehensive! plan! for! future! improvements!to!Lambert!Park.!Construction!of!these!improve ments!may!be!phased!based!on! future!funding!availability.! ! 3! !
  • 6. ! 2.0(Scope(of(Services( ! The!City!is!seeking!a!qualified!proposer!to!provide!tech nical!p rofessional!services!related!to!the! design! of! parks! and! recreation! improvement! projects.! ! The! proposer! applying! should! have! significant! experience! in! preparing! plans,! specifications,! cost! estimates! and! obtaining! any! required!permits!for!these!types!of!projects.!!The!objective!of! the!Project!is!to!complete!the! design! and! secure! approval! of! all! plans,! specifications,! estimates,! and! permits! from! all! applicable!agencies!in!order!to!immediately!thereafter!advertis e,!bid,!and!award!a!construction! contract.!! ! The! City! had! commissioned! and! approved! a! Conceptual! Master! Plan! (see! Attachment! “A”! c! Lambert!Park!Master!Plan)!and!this!plan!will!be!the!basis!for! design!services!in!this!RFP.!! ! The!following!tasks!are!identified!for!the!scope!of!services:! ( Task(1(– !Have!an!initial!scoping!meeting!with!the!City!to!finalize!the! specifics!of!the!Project!in! accordance!with!Attachment!“A”!– !Lambert!Park!Master!Plan.!Perform!Utility!Research/Other! Research! and! Coordination.! Conduct! required! surveys/design! surveys! and! prepare! detailed! base!map!for!use!in!developing!design!plans.!In!summary!this! task!shall!include!the!following! services:! !
  • 7. 1) Meetings!(number!of!meetings):! a. Scoping/Kickcoff!(2)! b. Utility!Company!(2)! c. Stakeholders!!c!Final!Design!(2)! d. City!Council!(2)! e. City!Staff!(5)! ! 2) Develop!and!maintain!Project!Schedule!for!Approval!based!on! City!approval!process!and! grant!restrictions! ! 3) Research,!Survey,!and!Base!Map!preparation! ! Task(2(– !Develop!all!design!plans!based!on!Task!1!and!Attachment!“A ”!–!Lambert!Park!Master! Plan.!Project!Plans:!Prepare!design!plans!for!the!construction! of:! ! 1) Upon!completion!of!Base!Map,!conduct!second!scoping!meetin g!with!City!to!discuss!any! deviation!from!initial!scoping!meeting!/!approved!Conceptual! Plan!that!may!be!required! based!on!information!obtained!during!Task!1.!! ! 2) New! Restroom/Concession/Staff! Building.! Concession! portion! designed! for! Level! 3! Concession.! !
  • 8. 4! ! 3) New!Plaza! ! 4) Renovate!Existing!Building! ! 5) New!Playground!Areas;!Tot!Lot!(Age!2c5)!&!Children!(Age!5c 12)!! ! 6) New!Multicuse!Sport!Fields! ! 7) New!Field!Lighting! ! 8) New!Outdoor!Fitness!Stations! ! 9) New!Hardscape!Improvements!and!Amenities! ! 10) New!Landscape!Improvements! ! 11) New!Utilities/Utility!Improvements!to!Support!the!proposed!im provements! !
  • 9. 12) Funding!to!construct!all!improvements!has!not!yet!been!secure d.!Should!full!funding!not! be! available! at! the! time! the! design! plans! and! specifications! are! approved,! it! may! be! necessary! to! construct! the! improvements! in! phases! based! on! available! funding.! Proposers! shall! provide! services! to! separate! the! plans! into! multiple! phases! for! construction!(Assume!3!phases).!!Phasing!shall!take!into!accou nt!the!time!gap!between! phases!and!a!maximum!of!3!phases.!Fee(to(this(subtask(shall(b e(identified(as(a(separate( line(item(under(Task(2.! ! Design!Services!shall!follow!and!include!Schedule!and!Schedu le!Control!covered!under!Section! 3,! Item! 8.! Additionally,! the! scope! of! professional! services! shall! include! coordination! with! all! applicable! regulatory! agencies! and! outside! utility! companies! if! required! for! the! design,! execution!and!completion!of!this!project.!Allow!3!weeks!for!e ach!City!review.!! ! Plans!shall!be!submitted!at!the!following!stages!of!completion! for!City!review!and!comment:! 30%,!65%,!95%,!100%!(Final).!! ! Task(3(– !Project!Specifications!at!30%,!65%,!95%,!and!100%!submittal :!Prepare!specifications!in! conformance! with! the! current! Standard! Specifications! for! Public! Works! Construction! (Greenbook)! and! other! applicable! agency! standard! plans,!
  • 10. specifications,! and! guidance! documents! in! order! to! obtain! plan! approval.! ! Provide! the! required! permits,! standards,! and! reference!materials!to!be!included!in!the!City’s!standard!contr act!documents.!!Every!item!of! work!must!be!fully!covered!including!a!measurement!clause!an d!a!payment!clause.! ! Task(4(– !Construction!Estimate:!Prepare!an!engineer’s!construction!esti mate!for!the!designed! Project!at!the!65%!submittal!and!100%!submittal.!!Cost!estima tes!shall!have!quantities!and!unit! 5! ! prices!with!backcup!calculations!for!all!quantities.!!The!consul tant!shall!verify!current!unit!prices! at!time!of!final!plan!approval.! ! Task(5(– !Permitting!and!Regulations:!Develop!and!manage!the!approval !process!for!all!required! permits! and! environmental! documents.! ! The! consultant! shall! observe! all! laws,! rules,! and! regulations!concerning!environmental!permitting!and!the!scope !of!professional!services!shall! include!all!steps!necessary!in!the!project!development!and!per mitting!process!to!fully!entitle! the!project!to!move!into!the!construction!phase.!! ! 1) Document,! design,! and! incorporate! environmental!
  • 11. requirements! (i.e.,! CEQA! documentation,!etc.),!mitigation!measures,!NPDES!requirement s!(including!adherence! to!MS4!LID!requirements),!BMPs,!air/water!quality,!and!erosi on/sediment!control!into! the!Project!construction!documents!as!required.! ! 2) Provide!a!signed!checkcoff!list!certifying!that!all!environment al!clearances/permits!have! been! completed! and! all! mitigation! measures! have! been! incorporated! into! the! PS&E! prior!to!the!advertisement!of!the!project!for!construction.! ! 3) Proposers! shall! incorporate! the! City! of! El! Monte’s! Tree! Protection! and! Preservation! Ordinance,!Chapter!14.03!of!the!El!Monte!Municipal!Code!(E MMC)!as!applicable.!!The! deliverables! provided! to! the! City! shall! conform! to! those! regulations! to! ensure! a! complete!and!conforming!project.!!The!consultant!and!its!subc onsultants!shall!comply! with! Public! Works! Greenbook! and! EMMC! in! the! preparation! of! full,! complete,! and! accurate!PS&E.!Note:!The!City!shall!supply!the!successful!pro poser!with!a!recent!tree! survey!report!for!Lambert!Park.! ! 4) Proposers! shall! incorporate! all! federal,! state,! and! local! laws,! rules,! and! regulations! concerning! public! works! as! applicable.! ! The! deliverables! provided! to! the! City! shall! conform! to! those! regulations! to! ensure! a! complete! and!
  • 12. conforming! project.! ! The! consultant!and!its!subconsultants!shall!comply!with!Public!Con tract!Code!Section!10120! in!the!preparation!of!full,!complete,!and!accurate!PS&E.! ! Task(6(– !Construction!Support!Services:!Provide!engineering!services!p rior!to,!during,!and! following!construction!including:! ( 1) Attend!a!precconstruction!meeting!and!provide!clarification!of! contract!documents!as! needed.! ! 2) Assist!the!City!with!Request!for!Information!responses.! ! 3) Provide! review! of! the! Contractor’s! submittals! for! conformance! with! the! contract! documents.! ! 4) Subsequent!to!completion!of!construction,!the!consultant!shall! provide!Mylar!plots!of! 6! !
  • 13. revised!drawings!incorporating!all!ascbuilt!revisions!clouded!a nd!noted!in!the!revision! block!using!the!Contractor’s!record!red!lines.!!The!Project!dra wings!should!be!stamped! “Project! Record! Drawings”.! ! Transmit! original! Mylar! Record! Drawings! and! two! CDs! containing!all!project!drawings!including!AutoCAD!files!as!we ll!as!PDF!versions.!! ! All!data,!documents,!and!other!products!used!or!developed!dur ing!the!project!will!become!the! property!of!the!City.! ! 7! ! ! 3.0(Proposal(Format( All!proposals!shall!include!the!following!information!and!com ply!with!the!associated!page!limit! restrictions.!!Note!that!1!page!includes!the!front!side!of!an!8.5 x11!sheet!of!paper!and!the!cover! does!not!constitute!a!page.! ! 1) Cover!Letter.!!Maximum!1!page!cover!letter!signed!by!an!offic er!of!the!firm,!binding!the! proposer! to! all! of! the! commitments! made! in! the! submittal.! ! The! letter! shall! include!
  • 14. name,!address!and!phone!number!of!the!person!authorized!to!r epresent!the!proposer! and!shall!include!the!following!Statement:! a. I!HAVE!READ!UNDERSTOOD,!AND!AGREED!TO!ALL!STA TEMENTS!IN!THIS!REQUEST! FOR! PROPOSAL! AND! ACKNOWLEDGE! RECEIPT! OF! ALL! ADDENDUMS/AMENDMENTS! AS! WELL! AS! TO! THE! TERMS,! CONDITIONS,! AND! ATTACHMENTS!REFERENCED.! ! 2) Proposer’s!Background.!!!Maximum!2!page!background!on!the !proposer!and!its!area(s)! of!professional!expertise!relevant!to!this!RFP.!!An!additional! 1!cpage!may!be!included!to! highlight!the!background!of!each!proposed!subconsul tant!to!be !used!by!the!proposer! and!the!specific!task(s)!or!functions!the!subconsultant!will!per form.!!! ! 3) Qualifications!and!Experience!of!Proposer’s!Personnel.!!Maxi mum!3!page!summary!of! the!relevant!experience,!work!history,!training,!education!and! special!certifications!of! the! proposer’s! personnel! who! will! be! performing! the! professional! services! contemplated!under!this!RFP!on!the!proposer’s!behalf.!!Briefly !discuss!the!Consultant! team's!qualifications!and!experience!with!projects!of!a!similar! magnitude!and!nature.!!
  • 15. Proposers!shall!provide!identical!information!for!all!subconsul tants’!performing!any!of! the! tasks! or! services! contemplated! under! this! RFP! on! the! proposer’s! behalf.! ! The! summary!shall!also!include!the!office!lo cation!of!key!personne l!proposed!to!work!on!this! contract.! ! Relevant! experience! can! include! your! company’s! overall! experience,! experience! with! similar! projects! and! the! experience! of! individuals! on! your! proposed! team.!!Show!how!your!experience!relates!to!the!demands!of!th is!project.! ! 4) Project!Approach.!!Maximum!3!page!summary!of!the!proposed !approach!to!designing! this! park! improvement! project.! ! The! proposer! shall! explain! the! way! in! which! the! proposer!will!timely!complete!all!of!the!tasks!called!for!under !the!RFP!along!with!an! estimate!of!the!time!it!will!take!to!complete!each!task.!!Includ e!a!brief!overview!of!the! Consultant's! understanding! of! the! project.! ! The! content! will! reflect! the! particular! viewpoint!of!the!Consultant.!!! ! 5) Proposed! Personnel.! ! Maximum! 2! page! resume! for! the! project! manager! and! 1! page! resume! for! each! of! the! other! key! personnel,! including! subconsultants,! which! will! be! performing!the!majority!of!the!work!on!this!project/contract.!! Resumes!for!corporate!
  • 16. leadership!should!not!be!included!unless!said!individuals!will! be!performing!substantial! 8! ! work!on!this!project.!!The!designated!Project!Manager!shall!be !the!primary!contact!with! the!City!during!the!contract!period!and!shall!function!in!that!c apacity!while!employed!by! the!firm.!!In!addition,!the!City!must!approve!changes!of!perso nnel.!! 6) Quality! Assurance/Quality! Control! Procedures.! ! Maximum! 1! page! brief! description! of! the! consultant’s! approach! to! implement! a! Projectcspecific! Quality! Control! Plan.!! Describe! the! major! elements! and! steps! of! the! quality! assurance! /! quality! control! (QA/QC)! program! and! procedures! that! will! be! followed! for! each! deliverable! (i.e.! engineering! discipline! review,! coordination! review,! constructability! review,! QA/QC! control!review,!etc.).!! ! 7) References.!!Each!proposal!must!include!at!least!3!public!agen cy!references!going!back! at!not!more!than!five!(5)!years!from!the!issuance!of!this!RFP!i n!which!the!proposer!was! engaged!to!perform!tasks!similar!to!those!requested!under!this! RFP.!!References!should! place!an!emphasis!on!past!projects!in!which!the!personnel!to!b
  • 17. e!used!by!proposer!for! this!project!were!deployed.!The!references!should!include!the! name,!title!and!contact! information! of! the! public! agency! officer! or! employee! responsible! for! overseeing! the! proposer’s!work.!! ! 8) Schedule!and!Schedule!Control.!!Maximum!2!page!schedule!de tailing!when!the!specific! Tasks! will! be! completed.! ! Proposers! should! factor! in! additional! time! that! may! be! required!due!to!reasonably!foreseeable!types!of!delays.!The!pr oposal!shall!identify!all! critical!task!sequencing!and!critical!paths!required!to!ensure!t h at!the!work!is!timely!and! completely!completed.!The!Consultant!shall!submit!a!detailed! project!schedule!outlining! the!tasks,!activities,!deliverables,!milestone!and!duration!requi red!for!the!completion! and! submission! of! each! of! the! deliverables! identified! in! the! Scope! of! Services.! The! schedule! shall! also! factor! in! reasonable! review! and! feedback! periods! for! draft! deliverables!by!City!staff!as!well!as!any!and!all!legally!manda ted!review!and!comment! period,!including!those!that!may!be!required!by!third!party!reg ulatory!agencies.!! ! 9) Fee!Schedule/Cost!Proposal.! !Maximum!3!page!detailed!cost!estimate!for!performing! specific!Tasks!identified!in!the!RFP!and!a!schedule!of!rates!fo
  • 18. r!each!proposed!personnel! that!may!be!tasked!to!complete!the!Project.!The!Taskcspecific! cost!estimate!shall!include! an! estimate! of! the! number! of! hours! per! staff! member! by! proposed! task! and! clearly! identify!an!hourly!rate!schedule!for!the!proposed!staff.!The!pr oposal!shall!indicate!the! compensation!structure!for!performing!specific!services!identif ied!in!Tasks!1!through!6! (e.g.! flat! lump! sum! or! hourly! rate! structure)! for! each! Task.! ! The! proposal! shall! also! include! costs! and! expenses! related! to! photocopying,! postage,! travel,! etc.! (i.e.! Reimbursement! expenses).! ! To! the! extent! that! a! proposal! contemplates! the! use! of! subconsultants! to! perform! any! one! or! more! of! the! above! described! tasks! on! the! proposer’s! behalf,! the! proposal! shall! include! a! List! of! Subconsultants! identifying! all! subconsultants!and!state!the!fee!for!each!subconsultant!in!the! Fee!Schedule!under!the! appropriate!Task!under!which!the!service!will!be!provided.!!In !so!far!as!the!proposer’s! proposal! contemplates! an! increase! in! compensation! rates! or! charges! prior! to! the! completion!of!Tasks!1!through!6,!and!during!the!term!of!the!p ortion!of!the!PSA!or!any! 9! ! extension!term,!the!proposal!shall!clearly!indicate!when!such!i ncreases!will!take!effect! and!by!how!much.!
  • 19. ! a. The!Fee!Schedule/Cost!Proposal!shall!be!delivered!in!a!separat e!sealed!envelope! which!is!plainly!marked!on!the!outside!“Lambert!Park!Phase!II !(CIP!NO.!819)”!and! addressed! to! the! abovecmentioned! location.! ! The! envelope! shall! contain! the! name!and!address!of!the!consultant!clearly!marked!on!the!outs ide.! ! The!City!reserves!the!right!to!delete!specific!task(s).!! 10! ! ! 4.0(Evaluation(Criteria( Each! proposal! shall! be! evaluated! on! the! basis! of! the! proposer’s! expertise,! experience! and! training!and!the!expertise!of!its!key!personnel!along!with!prior !contracting!history,!approach!to! the!project,!cost,!proposed!schedule!and!compliance!with!the! RFP!requirements!including!the! terms!of!the!attached!PSA.!Each!such!factor!shall!be!weighted !by!the!City!as!follows:!! 1) Expertise,! Experience! &! Training! Plus! Prior! Contracting! History! (25%)! –! The! expertise,! experience! and! training! of! the! proposer! and!
  • 20. its! key! personnel! and! previous!experience!with!similar!work!in!similar!fields!and!qu alifications!and!depth! of! the! staff! that! will! perform! the! work! on! this! project.! ! This! factor! includes! evaluation!of!the!proposer’s!prior!contracting!history,! including!the!review!of!the! proposer’s!certifications!relating!to!false!claims,!debarment!an d!civil!litigation.! ! 2) Project! Approach! (40%)! –! The! proposer’s! responsiveness! in! developing! a! comprehensive!plan!while!meeting!regulatory!requirements!and !the!City’s!specific! needs.! ! 3) Cost! (15%)! –! The! proposed! compensation! structure! (inclusive! of! hourly! rates! of! compensation,!pass!through!costs!and!subconsultant!costs)!for! the!performance!of! Tasks! 1! through! 8,! inclusive! of! its! proposed! notcto! cexceed! sum.! ! The! proposers! proposed! strategy! for! containing! costs! incurred! by! City! while! still! meeting! the! objectives!and!standards!set!forth!under!the!RFP.! ! 4) Schedule!(10%)!– !Proposal!for!completing!the!project!in!a!timely!manner,!inclu sive! of! the! proposer’s! ability! to! identify! critical! paths! for! the! timely! and! competent!
  • 21. completion!of!all!work!contemplated!under!the!RFP.!! ! 5) Compliance! with! RFP! (10%)! –! The! ability! of! the! proposer! to! comply! with! all! instructions!set!forth!under!this!RFP!as!well!as!the!proposer’s! ability!to!agree!to!all!of! the!terms!and!conditions!of!the!attached!PSA!without!modifica tion,!particularly!as! relates!to!indemnification,!insurance!requirements!and!standard s!of!care.!! ! ! 11! ! ! 5.0(Selection(Process( A! selection! committee,! comprised! of! City! staff! will! review! the! proposals.! ! Proposals! will! be! ranked!on!qualifications!and!the!selection!committee!may!choo se!to!interview!several!of!the! top!ranked!proposers.!However,!at! its!sole!discretion!the!selection!committee!may!dispense! with!interviews!and!select!a!proposer!to!perform!the!work.! 12! !
  • 22. ! 6.0(Proposal(Requirements( Proposals!must!be!submitted!using!the!following!methods:!!! Three!(3)!printed!copies!of!the!proposal!must!be!received!prio r!to!the!Submission!Deadline.!! Proposals!shall!be!submitted!to!the!following!address:! ! City!of!El!Monte!! Department!of!Public!Works!–!Engineering!Division! City!Hall!West! 11333!Valley!Boulevard! El!Monte,!CA!91731c3293! ! ATTN:!Elaine!Jeng,!P.E.! Public!Works!&!Utilities!Director/City!Engineer! ! Subject:!RFP!–!Lambert!Park!Phase!II!–!CIP!NO.!819! ! Proposals!may!be!submitted!via!personal!delivery,!overnight!c ourier!(e.g.,!FedEx!or!UPS)!or!U.S.! Mail.!Proposals!must!be!received!by!or!before!the!Submission! Deadline.! !Proposals!that!are! deposited! with! an! overnight! courier! or! post! marked! prior! to! the! Submission! Deadline! but! received!after!the!Submission!Deadline!will!not!be!considered! by!the!City.!!! Submitted! proposals! shall! be! maintained! as! confidential! records! of! the! City! up! to! the! Submission!Deadline.!!Proposers!may!withdraw,!modify!and/or
  • 23. !resubmit!a!proposal!prior!to!the! Submission!Deadline!but!not!after.! !Proposers!shall!be!bound!to!the!terms!of!their!proposal! following! the! Submission! Deadline,! however,! the! City,! in! its! sole! and! absolute! discretion,! reserves! the! right! to! accept! post! deadline! modifications! if! it! is! determined! that! such! modifications!are!in!the!best! interests!of!the!City.! !The!City!also!reserves!the!right!to!waive! minor!noncsubstantive!informalities!or!allow!the!proposer!to!c orrect!them.! ! 1) Proposers!shall!be!solely!and!exclusively!responsible!for!all!c osts!incurred!in!connection! with! the! preparation! and! submission! of! the! proposals;! demonstrations;! interviews;! preparation! of! responses! to! questions! and! requests! for! additional! information;! for! contract!discussions;!or!for!anything!in!any!way!related!to!this !RFP.! !The!City! is!not! liable!for!any!costs!incurred!by!a!proposer!in!response!to!this! RFP.!!Whether!or!not!a! proposer!is!awarded!a!contract!pursuant!to!this!RFP,!no!propo ser!shall!be!entitled!to! reimbursement!for!any!costs!or!expenses!associated!with!the!p roposer’s!participati on! in!this!RFP!process.!! ! 2) Late!proposals!will!not!be!considered.! ! 3) The!City!reserves!the!right!to!reject!any!and!all!proposals!rece
  • 24. ived!as!a!result!of!this! RFP.!!The!City’s!potential!award!of!a!contract!will!not!be!bas ed!on!any!single!factor!nor! will! it! be! based! solely! or! exclusively! on! the! lowest! cost! proposal.! ! If! a! contract! is! 13! ! awarded,! it! will! be! awarded! to! the! proposer! who! in! the! judgment! of! the! City! has! presented!an!optimal!balance!of!relevant!experience,!technical! expertise,!price,!quality! of!service,!work!history!and!other!factors!which!the!City!may! consider!relevant!and! important!in!determining!which!proposal!is!best!for!the!City.!! ! 4) The!City!reserves!the!right!to!cancel!or!modify!this!R FP.!!The re!is!no!guarantee!that!the! City!will!award!contract.! ! 5) The! City! reserves! the! right! to! investigate! the! qualifications! of! any! proposer! under! consideration!including!proposed!subcontractors!and!parties!ot herwise!related!to!the! proposer!and!require!confirmation!of!information!furnished!by! a!proposer,!or!require! additional! evidence! of! experience! and! qualifications! to! provide! the! services! or! otherwise!discharge!the!obligations!required!by!this!RFP.!
  • 25. ! 6) Following!the!Submission!Deadline,!the!City,!pursuant!to!the! California!Public!Records! Act!(Govt.!Code!Section!6250!et!seq.)!reserves!the!right!to!ma ke!copies!of!all!submitted! proposals!available!for!inspection!and!copying!by!any!intereste d!member!of!the!public,! except!to!the!limited!extent!the!City!determines!that!any!infor mation!contained!in!a! proposal!is!legally!privileged!under!the!California!Public!Reco rds!Act.!!By!submission!of! a!proposal,!proposers!acknowledge!and!agree!that!their!propos al!and!any!information! contained!therein!may!be!disclosed!by!the!City!to!interested!m embers!of!the!public,! including!other!proposers.!! ! 7) The!City!reserves!the!right!to!approve!or!disapprove!of!particu lar!subcontractors,!joint! venture!partners,!or!other!proposed!team!members.! ! 8) The!City!reserves!the!right!to!evaluate!responses!in!terms!of!t he!best!interests!of!the! City,!applying!criteria!provided!in!this!RFP!and!any!other!crit eria!the!City,! in! its!sole! discretion,!deems!pertinent.! !
  • 26. 9) By!the!submission!of!a!proposal,!each!proposer!accepts!and!ag rees!to!execute!a!written! Professional!Services!Agreement!(PSA)! in!the!form!attached!hereto!as!Exhibit!1.! !By! submission!of!a!proposal,!each!proposer!agrees!to!execute!a!P SA!with!the!City!in!the! form!attached!hereto!as!Exhibit!1,!inclusive!of!all!stated!terms !and!conditions!relating! to! indemnification,! required! insurance! and! standard! of! care! requirements.! ! If! a! proposer!is!unable!to!agree!to!any!of!the!terms!or!conditions!o f!the!PSA!in!the!form! attached!hereto,!the!proposer!must!identify!the!provision(s)!in! question!and!provide!an! explanation!as!to!why!the!proposer!cannot!comply!with!such!p rovisions.!!If!a!proposers! objection! to! a! certain! provision! of! the! PSA! is! merely! a! question! of! added! cost,! the! proposer!shall!indicate!in!the!proposal!the!difference!in!cost!a ssociated!with!complying! with!the!provision(s)!versus!the!cost!associated!with!the!City’s !waiver!or!modification! of!the!provision(s).!!The!City!shall!be!under!no!obligation!to! make!modifications!to!the! PSA! after! a! contract! has! been! awarded! and! proposers! shall! be! deemed! to! have! incorporated!all!costs!associated!with!compliance!with!the!PS A!into!their!proposal.!!A! 14! !
  • 27. proposer’s!inability!to!comply!with!one!or!more!provisions!of! the!PSA!shall!be!a!factor! that!will!be!considered!by!the!City!in!determining!which!prop osal!will!serve!the!best! interest!of!the!City!when!all!other!factors!are!taken!into!accou nt.!! ! 10) All!proposals!must!remain!valid!for!a!minimu m!period!of!nine ty!(90)!calendar!days!after! the! Submission! Deadline.! ! Responses! may! not! be! modified! or! withdrawn! by! the! proposer!during!this!period!of!time!except!in!accordance!with! this!RFP!and!with!written! permission!granted!by!the!City.! ! 11) All!questions!or!requests!for!clarification!shall!be!submitted!vi a!email!to!Alan!Palermo! at! [email protected]! by! the! REQUEST! FOR! INFORMATION! DEADLINE.! ! All! questions!received!by!this!deadline!will!be!addressed!and!post ed!on!the!City’s!website! (www.ci.elcmonte.ca.us)!by!the!RELEASE!OF!INFORMATION !REQUESTED!DATE.! ! 12) If!it!becomes!necessary!to!revise!any!part!of!this!RFP,!an!add endum!will!be!posted!on! the!City’s!website.!!It!shall!be!the!sole!responsibility!of!the!pr oposer!to!check!for!any! addendums!to!the!RFP!that!may!be!issued!by!the!City.!
  • 29. 3Significance of Materials Used in ArtRita Tekippe and Pamela J. Sachant 3.1 LEARNING OUTCOMES After completing this chapter, you should be able to: • Describe the differences among valuation of art materials, especially with regard to intrinsic qualities of raw material versus produced objects • Discuss the differences between monetary and cultural values for works of art • Discuss the idea of “borrowed” significance that comes with the re-use of components from previous artworks • Describe the significance of value added to objects by complex artistic processes or by changing tastes in different eras 3.2 INTRODUCTION Among the aspects of an artwork that evoke response, aid understanding, and contribute meaning will be the material(s) used in its cre- ation. These materials might make it more or less important, more or less valuable, or might bring a variety of associations that are not in- herent in the essential form. For example, you might recognize a vase not merely as a vase, but as a Louis Comfort Tiffany (1848-1933, USA) Favrile glass vase. (Figure 3.1) Knowing the cre- ator, material, and special processes involved in the artwork’s creation would add to and might change your perception and appreciation in sev-
  • 30. eral important respects. For example, you could Figure 3.1 | Bowl Artist: Louis Comfort Tiffany Source: Met Museum License: Public Domain CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Page | 78 INTRODUCTION TO ART link it to an important artist, an innovative artistic technique, a significant period in American dé- cor and manufacturing and marketing, a valuation based on its collectability, and numerous other interesting details about its creation and use. The most apparent choices in this regard are for three-dimensional forms such as sculpture and architecture, where it is more likely that costly and precious materials such as gold, silver, gems, marble, or bronze are used in its creation. The distinction among material choices for draw- ing and paintings will also have certain effects for their meanings. For example, if a painter applied gold leaf, 22K gold pounded into extremely thin sheets, to a painting’s surface, the monetary and cultural value of the work increases. (Figure 3.2) The monetary value refers to the amount a buyer is willing to pay, which in this case includes the cost of the materials the artist factors into the
  • 31. price of the artwork. The cultural value is the perceived quality or merit of the work: what it is worth according to that culture’s standards of ar- tistic importance or excellence. If a work of art has high monetary or cultural value, the owner’s reputation and status are, in turn, elevated. Without considering each and every possibil- ity in this regard, we should look at a few pointed examples that will help us know what to consid- er when we examine artworks with a view to the choices of materials that the artist (or patron) must have made. The techniques for many of these is discussed in greater detail in other parts of the text, so our primary focus here will be on the intrinsic materials, although the ways they are worked, used, and combined are inextricably sig- nificant in some of these cases. 3.3 UTILITY AND VALUE OF MATERIALS The earliest drawings, paintings, vessels, and sculptures were made with whatever the artists could find and turn to their use for creating images and objects; such readily-available material includes mud, clay, twigs, straw, minerals, and plants that they could use directly or with slight alteration, such as grinding and mixing minerals with water to apply to cave walls. (Figure 3.3) Experimentation was surely part of the process and, just as surely, much of it is lost to us now, although we have some examples of works, materials, and tools to give us insight into the artistic processes and material choices. Figure 3.2 | Annunciation to the Shepherds,
  • 32. illumination from the Book of Pericopes (Lectionary) of Henry II, fol. 8v, 1002-1012 CE. Source: Artstor.org License: Public Domain http://Artstor.org Page | 79 INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART For example, in works such as this earthenware, or baked clay, vessel, the artist had ex- plored sufficiently to discover that mixing a certain type of earth in certain proportions with water would yield a flexible substance. The resulting clay could be handbuilt, generally by wrapping and smoothing coils, into a vessel shaped with a conical bottom that would sit nicely in a coal fire for heating its contents. (Figure 3.4) A twig or string might be used to incise marks in the surface, not only to decorate it, but also to make it easier to hold onto than if it were completely smooth. Dating to c. 3,500 BCE, pots such as this from the late Neolithic era in Korea are known as Jeul- mun pottery, meaning “comb-patterned.” The clay could be found in different colors, textures, density, potential for adherence, etc. It could be manipulated by hand to make containers to store, transport, cook, or serve all sorts of goods. The invention of the potter’s wheel allowed artists to “throw” the clay on a rotating platform the artist operated by hand or powered with a kicking motion.
  • 33. When and where the potter’s wheel first appeared is much debated, but it was widely used in Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Southeast Asia before 3,000 BCE. Using a potter’s wheel allowed the artist to turn vessels with thinner walls, a greater variety of and more uniform shapes and sizes, and a larger array of painted and incised decorative elements for additional aesthetic appeal. They could, as well, make molds for serial production of commonly used types of pots. By the time of the Ming Dynasty in China (1368-1644), vases such as this from the Xuande period (1426-1435) painted in imperial (cobalt) blue and white display both the technical inno- vations and the remarkable degree of refinement achieved. (Figure 3.5) The development of such Figure 3.3 | Reproduction of a bison of the cave of Altamira Author: User “Rameessos” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: Public Domain Figure 3.4 | Korean neolithic pot, found in Busan Author: User “Good friend100” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: Public Domain CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Page | 80
  • 34. INTRODUCTION TO ART mineral resources as kaolin and petuntse allowed ceramicists to create porcelain, one of the most refined and hardest types of pottery, which became known as “china” because of the origins of the materials and processes; chinaware was soon emulated the world over for its beauty and utility as tableware and décor. Traders from Portugal returned from China with chinaware (porcelain vessels) in the sixteenth century. The semi -translu- cent material, elegant shapes, and glass-like, intricately dec- orated surfaces of the pots were unlike anything produced in Europe at that time. The demand for such wares quickly spread throughout Europe, and ceramicists on that continent spent the next two centuries trying to unlock the secret of how to create such smooth, white, and hard pottery. Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus and Johann Friedrich Böttger, both employed for that purpose by Augustus II the Strong, Elector of Saxony (to- day Germany) and King of Poland (r. 1694-1733), are credited with producing the first European porcelain in 1708. It would become known as Meissen ware because it was produced at the factory set up in the town by Augustus II for that purpose to safeguard the formula and maintain his exclusive control over the creation and sale of European porcelain. (Figure 3.6) The monopoly held by Augustus II was short-lived, howev- er, as the secret was sold and a competing factory opened in Figure 3.5 | A Ming dynasty Xuande mark and period (1426-1435) imperial blue and white vase Author: User “Meliere” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 4.0
  • 35. Figure 3.6 | Teapot Artist: Königliche Porzellan Manufaktur Author: Walters Art Museum Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Figure 3.7 | Pitcher Artist: American Porcelain Manufacturing Company Source: Met Museum License: OASC Page | 81 INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Vienna, Austria, by 1717. From there, variations of the formula and the production of porcelain spread throughout Europe as demand increased from the privilege of royalty, to the rich and titled, and eventually to all who could afford the status-giving ware. For example, this nineteenth-cen- tury commemorative pitcher made by the American Porcelain Manufacturing Company would have been presented to specially mark an occasion. (Figure 3.7) Although it is a distant relative of Chinese imperial porcelain ware and the royal courts of Europe, the techniques and materi- als used in its creation were still associated with tradition, wealth, and high social standing, elevating the cultural val - ue of this mass-produced vessel to the level of a keepsake or even a family heirloom. Objects such as this are valued beyond their monetary worth or utilitarian purposes, both due to the tactile and aesthetic qualities that come from
  • 36. the physical substance and techniques used and to histori - cal and social associations they hold. Similarly, drawing and painting, apparently first confined to the rock walls of nature, were areas of exploration for artists who later applied color to the built walls of architecture, and then to portable objects of various types. Ceramic ware was decorated with images from nature, pictorial and narrative motifs, and messages of myth, power, and even everyday life. The same is true of tomb walls of Egypt (Figure 3.8), palace walls in ancient Iraq, (Ashurnasirpal II with Attendants and Soldier: http://www.museumsyndicate. com/item.php?item=36470) and Greek vessels used for practical or ritual purposes (Figure 3.9). Figure 3.8 | Egyptian tomb wall painting Author: British Library Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC0 1.0 Figure 3.9 | Terracotta krater Source: Met Museum License: OASC http://www.museumsyndicate.com/item.php?item=36470 http://www.museumsyndicate.com/item.php?item=36470 CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Page | 82 INTRODUCTION TO ART Eventually such vessels, as well as books and other ob-
  • 37. jects, bore written information and pictorial explications of textual content: illustrations. Early textual works were often inscribed on stone tablets to ensure their durability or on relatively fragile materials like papyrus that required laborious preparation to make it suitable for conveying in- formation. In either case, the materials used added to the work’s significance. By the time of the development of the codex (probably in the Roman era), or manuscript with bound pages, the most common form of modern physical books, the choice material was animal skin, as seen in man- uscripts throughout Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, roughly the beginning of the fourth to the fifteenth centu- ries, in the Western and the Middle Eastern regions of the world. (Figures 3.10 and 3.11) Sheepskin, or parchment, the most commonly used support for written works, was obtained by laborious preparation of the pelts, through scraping and buffing the surface to make it suitable for use by scribes and il- lustrators who add- ed the words and pictures. The most refined book arts were often presented on vellum, or calfskin, prized for its smoother and finer surface. When used for especially im- portant works or those made for royal purposes, it was often dyed purple or dark blue, with script applied in gold or sil - ver ink and illustrations that included areas of gold or silver. (see Figure 3.2) These lustrous images were known as illu- minations, that is, given light. The viewer would at once recognize the special and distinctive treatment implied by the use of such precious materials and know that the patron had paid well for an elegant and important book. 3.4 PRECIOUS MATERIALS, SPOLIA, AND BORROWED GLORY
  • 38. Objects made for sacred or royal use were often wrought of such lavish and treasured components as vellum, silk, lin- en, wool, ivory, gold, silver, gems, and rare stones and min- erals. Frequently crafted for further refinement, such works Figure 3.10 | Historiated Letter L, with illustration of the Tree of Jesse, Capuchin’s Bible, f. 7v, c. 1180. BNF Author: User “Soefrm” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: Public Domain Figure 3.11 | Kitab al-Bulhan: Middle Eastern House and Lifting Machine, Arab scientific manuscript leaf. 1. 14th century Author: User “Peacay” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: Public Domain Page | 83 INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART show their precious properties to advantage. In ancient Rome/Byzantium, there were quarries for porphyry, a rich purple marble stone (the basis for the association of the color purple with royalty). Because it was restricted to royal purposes, its very appearance carried connotations of the imperial significance of any work made from it. It was often used for columns and other
  • 39. architectural components that thereby accentuated important structures or parts of them. Once the imperially controlled mines were abandoned in the fifth century CE, new items could not be made of porphyry, so older monuments were sometimes pillaged and re-used, with the royal sig- nificance transferred to the plunderers, implying not only the replacement of the old order by the new, but also the superiority of the conquerors. Porphyry burial containers were especially prized in antiquity and the Middle Ages. Constan- tina was the eldest daughter of Emperor Constantine the Great (r. 306-337 CE), the Roman ruler who in 313 CE decreed early Christians could practice their faith without persecution and confis- cated land should be returned to the Church. Although Constantine considered himself a Chris- tian, he did not abandon the Roman gods and religious rituals. For example, in 321 CE he stated that Christians and pagans alike should observe the day of the sun (later named Sunday); the cult of the sun god had been popularly observed in Roman culture for centuries, and associations of the sun as the source of light, warmth, and life had been adopted by those of the Christian faith. Constantine, according to legend, was baptized a Christian on his deathbed in 337 CE. When his daughter Constantina died in 354 CE, she was entombed in a porphyry sarcoph- agus, or stone coffin, that was richly carved with motifs from both the pagan Roman and Chris- tian faiths. (Figure 3.12) There are small, winged cupids gathering grapes among garlands of grape vines with peacocks and a ram below on the front and
  • 40. back of the coffin, and cupids treading on grapes on both ends. In Roman mythology, such scenes were associated with Bac- chus (known to the Greeks as Di- onysus), the god of the wine har- vest and wine making who as a baby was reborn after having been slaughtered by the Titans. Interpreted as Christian motifs, the cupids, who became known as putti or small, winged angels, are seen as preparing the grapes for the Eucharist, the sacrament commemorating the Last Supper by consecration of the bread and wine as the Body and Blood of Je- sus Christ. Such re-imaging and re-purposing of motifs and their meanings were frequently seen at this time of transition from pa- ganism to Christianity; further, Figure 3.12 | Sarcophagus of Constantina Author: User “Jean-Pol GRANDMONT” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Page | 84 INTRODUCTION TO ART
  • 41. having been adopted by Constantine and his family, they were associated with imperial pow- er and carried connotations of the Christian con- quest of paganism. Later, in the eighth and ninth centuries CE, Charlemagne (r. 768-814 CE) used pillaged por- phyry columns inside arches on the upper level of his imperial chapel, a building intended for his own entombment. (Figure 3.13) The Palatine Chapel (c. 796-798 CE, consecrated 805 CE) was part of the palace complex Charlemagne had built at Aachen, in what is now Germany. The interior of the chapel is an octagon topped by a dome supported by heavy piers with arches on the second level, where the imperial throne is located, with a view to the high altar (the ta- ble or other surface where religious rituals are carried out) located across the church on the first floor below. (Figure 3.14) The design of the building is modeled on mausolea, or buildings containing tombs, and church- es from the late Roman, early Christian, and early Byzantine periods (fourth-seventh cen- turies), such as San Vitale (526-647 CE) in Ravenna, Italy. (Figure 3.15) Charlemagne, who was not only King of the Franks and King of the Lombards but was also crowned as the first Holy Roman Emperor in 800 CE, used that design and the plundered columns to signify the revival and replacement of the old Roman Empire with his own reign as a Christian world ruler.
  • 42. Figure 3.13 | Aachen, Palace Chapel of Charlemagne. c. 800 Author: User “Velvet” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Figure 3.14 | Cross-sections of the Palace Chapel of Aachen Author: User “Sir Gawain” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: Public Domain Page | 85 INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Among others, Holy Roman Emperor Henry (or Heinrich) II (r. 973-1024) similarly borrowed and supplanted Charlemagne’s glory by adopting his pal- ace complex at Aachen and adding to its structure and furnishings with his own statements of imperi- al power. Henry II commissioned a lavish pulpit for the chapel that was completed in 1014. (Figure 3.16) The semi-circular pulpit has a smaller semi-circle to either side, a shape known as a trefoil. The center is made up of nine rectangular panels covered with chased gilt copper that has been formed by ham- mering into low relief images of the Four Evange- lists. The panels are adorned with gemstones and embellished with enamel, powdered glass fused to the surface by heat, and filigree, beads or threads of gold or silver arranged in designs on a metal sur- face. The three ivory panels on each of the smaller
  • 43. semi-circles depict pagan mythological figures; the panels were made in Egypt in the sixth century CE. Re-used parts such as the porphyry columns, gem- stones, and ivory panels are known as spolia, remnants that had been taken from older art and architecture and incorporated into new art objects and places with the implications of conquest, supe- riority, and heritage for the new patrons. Figure 3.15 | San Vitale, Ravenna Author: User “Väsk” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: Public Domain Figure 3.16 | Ambon (11th- century) of Henry II, Holy Roman Emperor. Aachen Cathedral, Germany. Author: User “HOWI” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Figure 3.17 | The Barbarossa chandelier Author: User “Lokilech” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Page | 86 INTRODUCTION TO ART
  • 44. Another, later Holy Roman Emperor, Frederick I (r. 1155- 1190), and his wife, Beatrice, commissioned a chandelier to hang below the octagonal dome in the chapel. (Figure 3.17) This was called the Barbarossa chandelier, reflecting the emperor’s nickname after his red beard; it was installed between 1165 and 1170 in honor of the Virgin Mary and as a tribute to Charlemagne. The chandelier’s forty-eight candles cast a tremendous spread of light in an age when artificial illumination was costly, emphasizing its association with earthly wealth and heavenly light. As a continuation of the work undertaken by his grandfa- ther Frederick I, which also included exhuming Charlemagne’s bones, Frederick II (r. 1220-1250), following the plans Bar- barossa had made, completed the creation of a lavish, new jew - eled and gilded shrine for the remains of Charlemagne, seeking to elevate him to the rank of sainthood. These statements in rich material forms, imply the surpassing glory of their impe- rial predecessor, shared by those who followed in his lineage. Moreover, the associations of royalty and honor for earthly rul - ers was often intertwined in very pointed ways to artwork asso- ciated with the Christian God and saints. Notable in this regard Figure 3.18 | Shrine of Charlemagne, Interior of palatine chapel in Aachen Cathedral, Germany. Author: User “ACBahn” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Figure 3.19 | Shrine of Charlemagne Author: User “HOWI” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0
  • 45. Figure 3.20 | Cross of Lothair Author: CEphoto, Uwe Aranas Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Page | 87 INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART is the shrine for Charlemagne—clearly a statement of imperial power—made of rich materials that reflect popular Christian no- tions of the Heavenly Jerusalem, where these saintly rulers were thought to act as intercessors for the believer. (Figures 3.18 and 3.19) Often such imperial works actually featured objects or sig- nificant decorative details from imperial Roman works, such as the antique cameo of the Roman Emperor Augustus that was applied to the Cross of the Emperor Lothair II. (Figures 3.20 and 3.21) The gilded cross, dated to c. 1000, is covered with 102 gemstones and thirty-two pearls and has a rock crystal seal near its base bearing a portrait of Lo- thair II (r. 835-869). Including the portraits of earlier emperors further emphasized the wealth and power of the ruler who had it made, believed to be Otto III (r. 983-1002). In addition, gemstones on such devotional works were selected for their qualities associated with healing, good fortune, the ability to ward off evil, and their mystical translu- cence, that fostered spiritual illumination.
  • 46. 3.5 LIQUIDATION OF TREASURES Works such as these often implied the stor- ing of riches as heav- enly treasure and also represented a means of storing material wealth that could be used for mundane purposes in time of need. We have records of a number of extrav- agant shrines and liturgical (relating to worship) fur- nishings that have not survived because they were tak- en apart and sold to feed a famine-stricken community or to provide for a new building project or an updated expression of devotion. Such works as the sumptuous Screen of Charlemagne (Figure 3.22) and the enormous Stavelot Altarpiece (Figure 3.23) are known to us only from drawings and small fragments that remain from the original objects. The disappearances of such works Figure 3.21 | Augustus cameo Author: User “Absalypson2” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Figure 3.22 | Screen of Charlemagne Artist: Piersac Source: www.medart.pitt.edu License: Public Domain Figure 3.23 | The mid-12th-century silver altar piece surrounding the shrine of Saint Remaclus
  • 47. Author: User “Kleon3” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: Public Domain CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Page | 88 INTRODUCTION TO ART indicate that their rich material components, while once intrinsic to their great spiritual impli- cations, at some point came to be seen as an important source of wealth that could be put to other use. 3.6 WOOD, INLAY, AND LACQUER Sculptures, objects, and architectural components of wood were also fashioned with a view to their monetary and cultural value. Some varieties of wood are more rare, others have qualities that make them easier to work in certain types of process, and there have been waves of “fashion” in wood choices at many eras. For example, lindenwood and limewood are associated with the Middle Ages, mahogany with eighteenth-century England and Scotland, oak with the Arts and Crafts work of the mid-nineteenth to early twentieth centuries, and delicately lacquered wooden goods with Yuan Dynasty China. Wooden sculpture was a far more predominant art form than
  • 48. painting in northern Europe during the Romanesque (c. 1000-1200) and Gothic periods (c. 1200-1500) in that region. The material favored was lindenwood or limewood due to the fineness of the wood’s grain, which allowed the sculptor to carve intricate detail. Generally, the sculpture was then poly- chromed, or painted, to increase the lifelike quality of the figure. Suggesting that spark of life was important in works such as The Throne of Wisdom because Mary, the compassionate and merciful Mother of God and Queen of Heaven, was believed to have the power to inter- cede with her Son, the infant Christ, on behalf of the faithful. (Figure 3.24) Mahogany was discovered as a marketable wood by European explorers and traders in the Caribbean islands, Central America, and South America by the seventeenth century. The naturally reddish-brown wood was prized for its beauty and strength and, throughout the 1700s, was fre- quently used in England and Scotland to create fine furni - ture for the market there and in the American colonies. A table such as this was a status symbol indicating the own- er’s wealth and taste, which was further enhanced by its use: this was not a utilitarian piece but a display table for chinaware. (Figure 3.25) The Arts and Crafts movement began in England in the middle of the nineteenth century, but quickly spread throughout Europe and to the United States. In a time of growing industrialization, with an ever greater num- ber of people moving to urban areas, working in facto- ries, and consuming machine-made goods, some felt the need to reclaim the handmade. With romantic associa-
  • 49. tions of simpler times, greater authenticity, and individ- Figure 3.24 | Throne of Wisdom Author: User “Okapi07” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Page | 89 INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART ual labor, furniture and decorative objects made as part of the Arts and Crafts movement were prized for their workmanship, design based on forms from nature, and respect for the natural materials used. For example, this cabinet is thought to have been made by Daniel Pabst (1826-1910, Germany, lived United States), one of the leading furniture makers of his day. It features elab- orately carved surfaces and inlay, where one material is cut and fit into another in complex patterns. (Fig- ures 3.26 and 3.27) Although the types of wood used—walnut, maple, and white pine—are not exotic or ra- re, the mastery with which they have been painstakingly cut and applied conveys a sense of preciousness. Inlay techniques were of- ten used to provide visual contrast and to emphasize both the distinctive and diverse qualities
  • 50. among the materials brought together and the refined craftsmanship involved. A piece of furni- ture made with such skill was prized for its singularity and for the intricacy of the craft involved in its creation. Lacquer has been used in art through- out Asia since Neolithic times, but carved lacquer is created in China only. Lacquer is resin from trees found in continen- tal Asia that hardens to a natural plastic when exposed to the air; it is resistant to water and du- rable. The base of a lac- quered object is wood, to which the liquid resin is applied in up to 200 lay- ers. This tray was made in the fourteenth century, during the Yuan Dynasty, Figure 3.25 | China table Source: Met Museum License: OASC Figure 3.26 | Cabinet Artist: Daniel Pabst Source: Met Museum License: OASC Figure 3.27 | Detail of Cabinet Artist: Daniel Pabst
  • 51. Source: Met Museum License: OASC CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Page | 90 INTRODUCTION TO ART when lacquer was most often tinted red by add- ing cinnabar, powdered mercury sulfide. (Figure 3.28) Once hardened, the lacquer was carved away to create detailed scenes of court life, such as we see here, floral motifs, nature scenes, drag- ons or abstracted patterns. While the resin itself is of little monetary value, the laborious process and high level of skill required for such delicate carving meant the completed objects had, and still have, significant cultural value. 3.7 INTRINSIC VALUES AND ENHANCED WORTH OF METALS Some of the materials prized by artists and patrons become more valuable because of these artistic uses; others are valuable for their intrin- sic worth as raw substance. From the earliest times, metals such as gold, silver, iron, and copper were used and traded in their natural states, as they came from the earth. They were mixed with other materials to create alloys, used for minting coins and forming sculptural objects. Among the most
  • 52. prominent metal materials first used for art were iron and bronze; forging and casting them were among the earliest complex artistic processes devised. Brass (copper alloyed with tin, lead, and/or other metals) and the harder, more durable bronze have been wide- ly used for grand public monuments that have fine detail, weather well, and can be hollow cast to reduce the amount of metal used. (Figures 3.29 and 3.30). Because forging and casting are complex and highly skilled processes, a viewer should know that an object made of this material was a significant statement for the artist or patron to make, one involving consider- able planning and staging to accomplish the work. 3.8 RARE MATERIALS AND PROHIBITED USES The economic and ecological factors involved in some materials have sometimes moved consideration of their use far beyond the discussion of artistic Figure 3.28 | Tray with women and boys on a garden terrace Source: Met Museum License: OASC Figure 3.29 | Bronze statue of Buddha Author: User “Dirk Beyer” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Page | 91 INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE:
  • 53. SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART production. An example is work in ivory, especially that obtained from elephants, although it was also taken to use for sculpture from their kin, the extinct mammoth, as well as from walruses and other mammals. Its rarity and workability led to its valuation for finely carved works, often for aristocratic patrons and very special purposes, such as the devotional objects (The Virgin and Child, Unknown: http://collections.vam.ac.uk/ item/O166591/the-virgin-and-child-polyptych- unknown/) and personal toilet articles (Attack on the Castle of Love, Unknown: http://collections. vam.ac.uk/item/O88416/attack-on-the-castle- of-mirror-back-unknown/) that were popular among the court ladies of the late Middle Ages. Its exploitation has led to scarcity and, ultimately, now threatens the very existence of elephants, since they have been savagely hunted and their herds decimated in the interest of profit. Consequently, both the sale and purchase of ivory objects, even those considered antiques and historical treasures, are now widely boycotted in the interest of preservation of the species. 3.9 MATERIAL CONNOTATIONS OF CLASS OR STATION Other more mundane materials and appropriated components might also have strong political connotations that intensify the meaning of the artwork. Korean artist Do Ho Su chose and assembled military dog tags to create a larger-than-life figural impression of an imperialistic robe with a hollow core. It carries connotations of the political strength of his native land being
  • 54. built upon such things as the dehumanizing mandatory military service he had performed, and the relationships between individuals and the collectives they form. (Some/One, Do Ho Suh: https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna- ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ suh-inst-002.jpg; Some/One detail, Do Ho Suh: https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine. netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst- 001.540.jpg) 3.10 BEFORE YOU MOVE ON Key Concepts One of the basic artistic choices for any creation is the material from which it will be made and so should be an area for careful attention in our analysis of any artwork. Deliberate choices can also involve the pointed spurning of rich resources in favor of humbler stuff, as in the robe created Figure 3.30 | The Minute Man Artist: Daniel Chester French Author: User “Flying Jazz” Source: Wikimedia Commons License: Public Domain http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O166591/the-virgin-and-child- polyptych-unknown/ http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O166591/the-virgin-and-child- polyptych-unknown/ http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O166591/the-virgin-and-child- polyptych-unknown/ http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O88416/attack-on-the-castle- of-mirror-back-unknown/ http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O88416/attack-on-the-castle-
  • 55. of-mirror-back-unknown/ http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O88416/attack-on-the-castle- of-mirror-back-unknown/ https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna- ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-002.jpg https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna- ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-002.jpg https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna- ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-001.540.jpg https://2yhr3j6imaw4e4zzg38k38ar-wpengine.netdna- ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/suh-inst-001.540.jpg CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Page | 92 INTRODUCTION TO ART by Do Ho Su, and less refined surfaces, such as cardboard or burlap for paintings; things that are only more recently available than those traditionally used, like plastics for sculpture, titanium for architecture; and the technologically evolved media that move into the realms of the physically immaterial. Choices and implications have expanded exponentially, and our examination of them should be broad, deep, and careful. Test Yourself 1. Discuss the differences between materials that are intrinsically precious, and those that are made more valuable by the processes or creative ideas in works of art, by considering specific
  • 56. examples. 2. Consider the use of spolia in at least three specific examples and discuss how they changed the significance of the art work to which they were applied. 3. Review and describe a specific process for creating artwork that involved procedures for combining diverse materials into the product. 4. Considering such common materials as clay or wood, discuss the ways in which an artist might use it for making an object of much greater value than the inherent worth, and what factors, other than the creation process, might lead people to value it highly. 3.11 KEY TERMS Codex: the book form in which pages (or leaves) of material such as parchment, vellum, or paper, are gathered into bundles and bound together—initially by sewing, now usually by glueing— and then provided with a cover to protect the sheets. Its ancestor was the scroll, in which the sheets were joined into a long continuous roll that was opened out from one side, rolled up at the other, for viewing the contents. Cultural value: the perceived quality or merit of the work: what it is worth according to that culture’s standards of artistic importance or excellence. Earthenware, or objects made from clay: such as vessels that are formed for specific uses and hardened either by drying in the air or by baking in high heat.
  • 57. Often, earthenware goods are distinguished from more refined clay-based objects that are creating with additional processing of the material or different/more complex firing methods. See porcelain Gold leaf: 22K gold pounded into extremely thin sheets, to be applied selectively to areas of 2-d or 3-d objects. Handbuilt: clay objects that are shaped by hand, often by wrapping and smoothing coils of clay into the desired form. These are distinguished from wheel - thrown or mold-made goods. Page | 93 INTRODUCTION TO ART CHAPTER THREE: SIGNIFICANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ART Illumination: literally, given light, specifically through the use of gold or silver for letting of illustrative touches in a manuscript. The term is also sometime used to describe manuscripts that have images added to them, as opposed to simply includi ng lettered text Manuscript: literally, hand-written presentation of script and/or images. The form was supplanted by books produced with a printing press, although the term is still used for a singular copy of a written work. Mausolea, plural of mausoleum: a building designed to house
  • 58. one or more tombs, usually for an important person. These were most often centrally- planned, with a design that pivoted around the burial site. In Christian usage, these were sometimes attached to a larger, congregational structure, but sometimes stood alone. They might house more than one tomb. Monetary value: the worth of materials or objects, in terms of “market value.” This might be determined by the value of the materials use or of the finished art object, considered differently from the cost of the materials. Parchment: sheepskin, prepared for use in manuscripts—less refined than vellum, used for finer and more expensive works. Polychrome: painted in several colors. Porcelain: highly refined ceramic ware, initially produced in China, with select materials like petuntse and kaolin, to create semi-translucent material, with elegant shapes, and glass-like, intricately decorated surfaces, and high-temp fired for hardened finishes. Potter’s wheel, wheel-thrown: pottery made with the use of a potter’s wheel, a device for turning the clay body on a rotating platform for a more uniform shape. These were first turned by hand, knee, or pedal motion, later electrified. Putti plural of putto: a small winged baby angel, a cherub. Spolia: bounty taken from and original context, as in the “spoils
  • 59. of war.” Often, items of spolia were re-used in later works to imply the conquest (and superiority) of the new owner over the original. Vellum: calfskin, prepared for use in luxury manuscripts, more highly prized than the rougher, less expensive parchment. City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 1 of 34 CITY OF GLENDALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS “GLENDALE-BURBANK REGIONAL STREETCAR FEASIBILITY STUDY” To: All Qualified Firms Date: July 31, 2017 Subject: Request for Proposals for City of Glendale: Glendale – Burbank Regional
  • 60. Streetcar Feasibility Study DUE DATE: Ten (10) hard copies and five (5) electronic copies on CDs responding to the Re- quest for Proposals are to be submitted to: Fred Zohrehvand Senior Transportation Planner City of Glendale 633 E. Broadway, Room 300 Glendale, CA 91206 By 5:00 pm on August 22, 2017. Proposals received after this date and time will not be considered. City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 2 of 34 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • 61. I. Schedule of Events ............................................................................................... ................. 6 II. Explanation of the Project ............................................................................................... ..... 6 III. Project Background ............................................................................................... .............. 6 IV. City of Glendale Background .............................................................................................. 7 V. Project Scope of Work............................................................. ......................... .................... 8 VI. Instructions to Proposer ............................................................................................... .... 15 VII. DBE Requirements ............................................................................................... ............ 18 VIII. Evaluation & Selection ............................................................................................... ..... 18 IX. Response to RFP – Formatting & Contents ..................................................................... 19 X. Appendix ............................................................................................... .............................. 22 Submittal Forms ............................................................................................... ....................... 23 Attachments ............................................................................................... ............................. 34
  • 62. City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 3 of 34 NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS NOTICE is hereby given that the City of Glendale (“City”) will receive Proposals until the dead- line established below for the following project: Glendale – Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Proposal Submittal Deadline: Submit before 5:00 p.m. on August 22, 2017 Proposal Submittal Location: 633 E. Broadway, Room 300, Glendale, CA 91206 NO LATE PROPOSALS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
  • 63. City of Glendale Contact Person for RFP Process: Ms. Arezoo Kamali Planning Assistant Phone: (818) 937-8333 Email: [email protected] Project Description: For the past several years there have been discussions on the concept of developing a street- car system in Downtown Glendale. Earlier streetcar concepts were discussed or evaluated by the Greater Downtown Strategic Plan (1996) and the Downtown Mobility Study (2007). A streetcar in Glendale has the potential to connect the various shopping, dining, entertain- ment and parking components of the Downtown area, and perhaps neighboring cities and other mass transit services. Streetcar systems also attract tourism, and visitors to Glendale will be able to utilize the streetcar to patronize business throughout the Downtown business district. Finally, we have the ability to establish connectivity among our various transportation modes by linking the streetcar to the Beeline and the Larry Zarian Transportation Center to develop a more effective and comprehensive transit system. The City of Glendale hopes to continue to provide the infrastructure and resources necessary for residents to incorporate transit oriented lifestyles into their daily lives, and become part of healthier communities.
  • 64. The feasibility study required to move forward with any streetcar concept would include: • Evaluate different route alignments and technologies for the streetcar; • Analyze Downtown Glendale infrastructure to determine its ability to accommodate a streetcar system; and if necessary, • Determine the infrastructure improvements needed to construct the system; • Determine what types of vehicles are obtainable and appropriate; • Establish how a streetcar system can be implemented; • Project potential streetcar ridership and revenues; • Predict traffic impacts; • Forecast impacts on Downtown Glendale businesses; and • Determine the overall cost of the project, including: • The various equipment options • Infrastructure improvements (tracks, street improvements) • Maintenance and Operating Costs City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 4 of 34 Other Proposal Information:
  • 65. 1. Request for Proposal Documents may be obtained in the City of Glendale Community Development Department, Urban Design and Mobility Division, lo- cated at 633 East Broadway, Room 300, Glendale, CA, 91206, or via email or mail at the request of consultants without any cost. 2. Acceptance or Rejection of Proposals. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Proposals, and to waive any informalities, irregularities or technical defects in such proposals and determine the lowest responsible proposer, whichever may be in the best interests of the City. No late proposals will be ac- cepted, nor will any oral, facsimile or electronic proposals be accepted by the City. 3. Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference. August 9, 2017 2:30pm- 4:00pm at 633 E. Broadway, Room 105, Glendale, CA 91206. 4. Race Conscious (RC)/DBE Participation. [NOTE: The following mandatory requirement applies ONLY to the Glendale – Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study contract. The U.S. Dept. of Transportation Regulations found that 49 CFR Part 26 shall apply to this contract. A disadvantaged business enterprise (“DBE”) contract goal of 10% goal has been established for this project. This
  • 66. goal must be met or good faith efforts to meet this goal must be demonstrated in order for a proposal to be considered responsive. The Consultant or subcontractor shall not discrimi- nate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The consultant shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the consultant to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy, as re- cipient deems appropriate. To assist consultants in ascertaining RC/DBE availability for specific items of work, the City has determined that RC/DBE could reasonably be expected to compete for subcontracting opportunities on this project, and their likely availability for work on this project is 10% Race Conscious RC/DBE. It is the proposer’s responsibility to verify that the RC/DBE’s fall into one of the following groups in order to count towards the RC/DBE contract goal: 1) Black American; 2) Asian-Pacific American; 3) Native American; 4) Wom- en; 5) Hispanic American; 6) Subcontinent Asian Pacific American and any other groups whose members are certified as socially and
  • 67. economically disadvantaged. Proposers are required to submit the Local Agency Pro- posal RC/DBE Commitment, “Exhibit 15-G” and the Good Faith Efforts, “Exhibit 15-H” forms form along with the proposal submittal. If the RC/DBE Commitment forms are not submitted with the proposal, the apparent low proposer, the 2nd low proposer, and the 3rd low proposer must complete and submit the RC/DBE Commitment forms (Exhibits 15-G and 15-H) to the City. Submittal of only the “Local Agency Proposer RC/DBE Commitment” form City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 5 of 34 may not provide sufficient documentation to demonstrate that adequate good faith efforts were made. For a list of RC/DBE’s certified by the California Unified Certification Pro- gram, go to: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/bep/find_certified.h tm Dated this ______ day of _____________, 2017, City of Glendale, California.
  • 68. Ardashes Kassakhian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale. City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 6 of 34 Definition of Terms The following terms used in the RFP documents shall be construed as follows: “City” shall mean the City of Glendale. “Agreement” shall be considered synonymous with the term “Contract.” “Proposer” shall mean the individual, partnership, corporation or other entity who responds to the RFP. “Consultant” shall mean the individual, partnership, corporation or other entity to which an agreement is awarded. “Days” shall mean the business days recognized by City of Glendale. I. Schedule of Events Event Date
  • 69. Request for Proposals (RFP) Issued July 31, 2017 Mandatory Pre-Proposal Meeting August 9, 2017 Deadline for Written Questions and Requests August 15, 2017 Responses and Addenda Issued August 15, 2017 Technical and Price Proposals Due August 22, 1017; 5:00pm Interview Firms (TBD based on City review of written proposal) Early September 2017 Proposed Approval of Selected Consultant(s) by City Council Early-Mid September 2017 Notice to Proceed / Service Contract Begins / Kick-Off Meeting Late October 2017 Project Completion Date (8-12) mos. after start of contract) Summer 2018 City of Glendale reserves the right to alter any of the dates shown above by written notice. Submit any inquiries via email to Ms. Arezoo Kamali, Planning Assistant at [email protected] No phone calls please. II. Explanation of the Project The purpose of this RFP is to: 1) Obtain the services of a well-qualified project team led by a single consultant/firm, or a consultant team with experienced sub-consultants who are experts in their respective fields, to develop a Streetcar Feasibility Study concentrating in the City of Glendale with optional tasks D1 & D2. III. Project Background
  • 70. Streetcars have been an integral part of the history of the City of Glendale. Streetcar systems such as the Pacific Electric and Glendale & Montrose Railway Company operated within the boundaries of modern-day Glendale from 1904 to1956. Recently, many cities have installed streetcar systems as part of larger successful redevelopment projects. These cities have observed formerly blighted areas turn City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 7 of 34 prosperous; property values increase and cultural resources enhance in the vicinity of newly installed streetcar systems. This benefit is in addition to the gains in transit services provided by the streetcar system for these cities. It is the City’s goal to develop a streetcar system that can create connectivity linking the various shopping, dining, entertainment, and parking resources of downtown Glendale with the region via the Larry Zarian Transportation Center and the Hollywood Burbank Airport. A successful streetcar system can also attract tourism and visitors to the city increasing commerce for Downtown Glendale businesses.
  • 71. IV. City of Glendale Background The City of Glendale is located at the eastern end of the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles Coun- ty, at the southern base of the Verdugo Moun- tains. Glendale is bordered to the northwest by the Tujunga neighborhood of Los Angeles, to the northeast by La Canada Flintridge and the unin- corporated area of La Crescenta, to the west by Burbank, to the east by Pasadena and to the south and southeast by the City of Los Angeles. Glendale is also defined by the 210, 2, 134, and 5 freeways. Glendale is a diverse, multilingual city of 191,719 residents (US Census Bureau 2010). Its business community, from manufacturing to financial ser- vices, employs nearly 100,000 people at more than 6,800 firms (US Census Bureau 2007). The area’s mobility network is well-connected by public transportation, including Metrolink and Amtrak service at the Glendale Transportation Center in South Glendale, by Metro Rapid and Local buses, and by the Glendale Beeline bus service. For purposes of long-range planning, Glendale is divided into four community planning areas, as described below: North Glendale Community Plan The community of North Glendale lies within the Crescenta
  • 72. Valley, which is clearly defined by the San Gabriel and Verdugo Mountains. The Crescenta Valley has a variety of neighbor- hood‐ oriented village centers and commercial districts, including the Sparr Heights Business District, Verdugo City and the suburban corridor of Foothill Boulevard. The most intense of these is the “town center” surrounding the vibrant, popular, and highly walkable Montrose Shop- ping Park. The North Glendale Community Plan was adopted by City Council in November 2011; the document is provided in the Appendix. City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 8 of 34 South Glendale Community Plan South Glendale includes Downtown Glendale, which is served by three public parking structures and ten parking lots, and has experienced significant growth in high-density mixed-use commercial and residential buildings since the adoption of the Downtown Specific Plan (2006) and the Downtown Mobility Study (2007). Just south of downtown is the Brand Boulevard of Cars, which contains a regional concentration of auto dealerships, and the Tropico town site, the city’s his- toric industrial base and a burgeoning mixed-use and residential neighborhood around the Larry Zarian Transportation Center. The South Glendale Communi-
  • 73. ty Plan is currently in development and its adoption is anticipated in early 2018. East & West Glendale Community Plan East Glendale includes hillside residential neighbor- hoods and neighborhood-serving commercial areas, and features Glendale Community College; this com- munity abuts the City of Pasadena. West Glendale includes hillside residential neighborhoods, commercial, and industrial districts; it features the Kenneth Village shopping area, the Walt Disney Company’s Grand Central Creative Campus, DreamWorks Animation studios, the Glendale Narrows Riverwalk along the Los Angeles River, and abuts the City of Burbank. Development of community plans for East and West Glendale will begin following the adoption of the South Glendale Community Plan. V. Project Scope of Work Scope of Work – Glendale-Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study In developing the Glendale-Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study, the Consultant shall comply with all applicable local, State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and federal facility design guidelines and requirements. The Scope of Work consists of the following tasks: Task A - PROJECT SETTING 1. Statement of Project Purpose and Function
  • 74. This task will focus on developing a statement of purpose and function for reintroducing streetcar service to the city of Glendale. Specific elements include: will help guide the development of the statement of project purpose redevelopment sites potentially served by a streetcar through South and West Glendale and into the neighboring city of Burbank adoption (see Task A-4) City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 9 of 34 2. Technology Option Review type of streetcar technology available to the City examples and in light of the project’s statement of purpose
  • 75. 3. Existing Conditions Review This task will provide the narrative context for the study ding geography, de- mographics, and economics and their status policies, and goals f the project report 4. Selection of Preferred Technology and Alignment Alternatives - Workshop and Report This task will include organization and conducting a workshop with selected staff and the City Council to develop consensus on the option or options to be carried forward for fur- ther study. consensus regarding the draft Statement of Project Purpose and Function; and on determining alignment alternatives and identifying minimum operating segments for each alternative, and confirming technology option(s) for further study
  • 76. 5. Concept Evaluation Report, Including Geodata In light of the project purpose, and for the preferred technology and alignment alterna- tives, an evaluation will be conducted of how a streetcar would be introduced into the transportation environment and streetscape. Specific elements include: efine design concepts including intersection and lane configurations, impacts on adjacent properties, access constraints and parking impacts tions for challenged intersections -O-W inventory and analysis aerial photography us- ing existing public & commercial sources wherever possible 6. Vehicles Review Identify and describe the range of vehicle types that are available for use in Glendale. Specific elements include: disadvantages, of the range of vehicle types available applicable government re-
  • 77. quirements opera- tions/maintenance requirements r Glendale streetcar City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 10 of 34 7. Preliminary Cost Estimates For the alignment alternatives identified in Task A-11, the order-of-magnitude capital and operating cost estimates will be refined. Specific elements include: frequency, run times, annual hours and fleet requirements minimum operating segment in each alternative operating segment in each alternative
  • 78. preliminary capital cost esti- mate for each alternative 8. Ridership Analysis Develop an estimate of ridership for each alternative utilizing an “off-line” modeling tech- nique. Specific elements include: -line” modeling process travel demand within project area alignment -line” spreadsheet model to produce patronage estimates for each alternative 9. Preliminary Traffic Analysis traffic conditions need to be evaluated along the corridor with respect to streetcar alternatives to traffic conditions, and the effects of traffic on streetcar operations a conceptual level parking analysis, and recom-
  • 79. mendations for further engineering design and traffic study 10. Funding Sources Report Refine the listing of funding sources to support the capital and operating cost require- ments of each alternative’s minimum operating segment. Specific elements include: be available to ap- ply to streetcar project f potential Federal funding sources identified source of fund- ing and the level of revenues each source could provide. 11. Illustrated Route Concepts and Design Report Refine system and alignment alternatives, including identification of a minimum operat- ing segment for each potential alignment. Specific elements include: fine the candidate system alignment(s) recommend a pre- ferred alternative for further evaluation.
  • 80. City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 11 of 34 for the preferred al- ternative drawings, cross- sections and sketches 12. MEETINGS, PRESENTATIONS and MANAGEMENT The Consultant will attend a start-up meeting in tandem with the notice to proceed, at which the City and the Consultant will finalize the scope of work and project schedule. Deliverables: As requested, the consultant team will attend project related meetings and presenta- tions. Specific elements include: Transportation & Parking Commission (TPC), City Council and community meetings
  • 81. coordination with the City and with sub consultants. City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 12 of 34 TASK B – PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT 1. Impact Assessment Impacts not addressed during conceptual design development will be identified and dealt with. Specific elements include: from the ridership projections for the preferred alternative g the design phase issues 2. Traffic Analysis -of-service (LOS) calculations for each intersection along the preferred alternative
  • 82. affect operations proposed road- way/signal changes for the preferred alternative. This is a planning level LOS analysis and will not estimate traffic diversion or incorporate detailed signal oper- ations analysis in this task. impacts (e.g. through changing intersection configuration, signal operations, implementing transit signal priority, etc.) 3. Transit Interface Report Identify the positive and negative impacts a streetcar service would have on existing and planned transit services in Glendale. Specific elements include: transit service within the project area. 4. Active Transportation & First/Last Mile Interface Identify opportunities to improve first last/mile connection in light of existing and planned
  • 83. bicycle and pedestrian facilities to streetcar service in Glendale. Specific elements in- clude: fy existing “Pathways” around proposed station locations consistent with the Metro First Last Mile Strategic Plan methodology, and note potential areas of conflict between a streetcar and non-motorized travel modes ransportation connectivity and access around proposed station locations 5. Operations Plan A final Operations Plan for the preferred alternative will be developed. Specific elements include: day and service frequency revenue vehicle miles and number of vehicles required City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 13 of 34
  • 84. 6. Capital Costs Estimate A final capital cost estimate reflecting the preferred alternative will be developed. Specif- ic elements include: Task A-7 estimates were produced elements 7. Operating & Maintenance Costs Estimate Prepare a final operating and maintenance cost estimate reflecting the final Operations Plan including: estimates developed in Task A-7 a revised estimate reflecting the final Operations Plan (Task B-5) Task C – IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 1. Phasing Plan Identify the steps and milestones required to advance from the current feasibility study to project implementation. Specific elements include:
  • 85. Federal (FTA) funded project and a non-federalized project es 2. Programming Strategies Report Identify the required local, regional, state and Federal approvals and clearances required for project implementation. Specific elements include: y federal, state, regional and local regulations applicable to a streetcar op- eration and the steps necessary to address each required inances or adopted plans report 3. Public Outreach Plan Develop an outline for a public outreach plan for the various phases to project opening. Specific elements include: c outreach and education program outline required for a suc- cessful public outreach program
  • 86. 4. Land Use & Zoning Analysis design guidelines, within the project area in light of Metro guidance and best practices relative to transit corridors and Transit-Oriented Development City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 14 of 34 design guideline policies to focus new growth within the project area, support streetcar ridership, and help achieve regional GHG/VMT reduction goals 5. Funding Plan Prepare a Funding Plan for the Glendale streetcar system. Specific elements include: get to the anticipated year of expenditure dollars the capital and O&M costs
  • 87. funding sources on of the project report Task D: Add Alternatives The City requests that proposers provide the following tasks as optional “add alternatives” to the project scope that the City may pursue if desired: 1. City of Burbank Streetcar Alignment A detailed study of the proposed streetcar system within the City of Burbank, including, but not limited to: • Alternative alignments connecting from the City of Glendale serving the Down- town Area of the City of Burbank, Media District, Hollywood Burbank Airport, and other points of interest within the City of Burbank. • This optional task to determine alternative alignments to serve the City of Bur- bank shall be the same Scope of Work that was identified for the City of Glendale portion of the Study: Task A – Project Setting; Task B – Preferred Option As- sessment; and Task C – Implementation Strategy. 2. Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) An evaluation of Personal Rapid Transit as a technology both alternative and in addition to a streetcar system in Glendale.
  • 88. extant or demonstration systems operating PRT in Downtown Glendale City of Glendale ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 15 of 34 VI. Instructions to Proposer Compliance with Applicable Guidelines and Regulations Consultants are required to comply with all applicable State of California guidelines and regula- tions regarding the Streetcar Feasibility Study. Late Proposals All proposals, as well as any modifications, received at this office after the hour and date speci- fied will not be considered unless they are sent by certified mail, for which an official, dated post office stamp has been obtained, and it is determined by the City’s Project Manager that the late receipt was due solely to delay in the mail. Disclaimers The City reserves the right to extend the time allotted for the
  • 89. RFP submittal, to interview the Proposer in person, and to request a best and final offer, should the City deem that it is in its best interest to do so. This RFP does not commit the City to award a contract, or to pay any costs incurred in its preparation. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all RFPs received as a result of this request, to negotiate with any qualified firm, or to cancel this RFP in part or in its entirety. The City may require the selected firm to participate in negotiations and to submit such technical, price, or other revisions of their proposals as may result from negotia- tions. Any costs incurred by the Proposer in responding to this Request for Proposals shall be the Proposer’s sole expense and will not be reimbursed by the City. Proprietary Information; Public Records Act The City seeks to conduct its business openly. Upon recommendation for award of Contract to the City Council, all Proposal Documents shall become a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public, with the exception of those elements of each Proposal that are identified by the Consultant and plainly marked as “trade secret,” “confidential,” or “proprietary”. Each ele- ment of a Proposal which a Consultant desires not to be considered a public record must be clearly marked as set forth above, and any blanket statement (i.e. regarding entire pages, doc- uments, or other, non-specific designations) shall not be sufficient and shall not bind the City in any way whatsoever. If City receives a request from a third party to make a Proposal available for inspection and copying, the City will notify the Consultant
  • 90. of the request. If a Consultant in- structs the City that the information is not to be released, City will withhold the information, pro- vided, the Consultant expeditiously seeks a protective order to prevent such release. If disclo- sure is required under the California Public Records Act or otherwise by law (despite the Con- sultant’s request for confidentiality), the City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records or part thereof. Consultant shall indemnify, defend (including Consultant providing and paying for legal counsel for the City), and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and representatives from and against any liability, claims, suits, demands, damages, fines, penalties, costs, or ex- penses arising out of or alleging the City’s refusal to publicly disclose one or more records that Consultant identifies as protectable, or asserts is protectable. Agreement Once selected, the successful Proposer must enter into a written Agreement with the CITY with- in fourteen (14) calendar days following Proposer’s receiving the CITY’s Notice of Intent to Award Contract. Before any services can commence, the selected Proposer will be required to execute the Standard Form of Agreement, a sample of which is attached here and alternately referred to as City of Glendale
  • 91. ___________________ RFP: Glendale –Burbank Regional Streetcar Feasibility Study Page 16 of 34 “Professional Services Agreement.” To facilitate the project’s smooth and timely implementation, Proposers responding to this RFP shall review all the terms and conditions of the Standard Form of Agreement including, but not limited to, provisions relating to insurance, indemnity, and termination. The CITY’s policy is that the Standard Form of Agreement be accepted as is. By submitting a Proposal to the CITY in response to this RFP, each Proposer is deemed to have provided its approval to the Standard Form of Agreement, accepting it without qualification. If a Proposer seeks limited modification of the Standard Form of Agreement, then in the Proposal a Proposer must identify the proposed changes. However, changes or qualifications to the Standard Form of Agreement may be weighed in the evaluation of the Proposal and may cause rejection of the proposal as non-responsive, in CITY’s determination. Insurance Requirements Based on the Scope of Work, insurance is required for the following coverages: • Professional Liability Insurance • Workers’ Compensation Insurance
  • 92. • Commercial General Liability or Business owners Liability Insurance • Business Automobile Liability Insurance The City’s specific insurance requirements are included in the Appendix to this RFP, as are sample Professional Services Agreements (PSAs) for 1) consultants who are not Architects, Landscape Architects, Professional Engineers, or Professional Land Surveyors and 2) consult- ants who ARE licensed professionals in the aforementioned fields. Requests for Clarification A Proposer with questions may submit to the City a written Request for Clarification by email to Ms. Arezoo Kamali, Planning Assistant at [email protected] for an interpretation or clarification of, or addenda to, this RFP. Any such request must be received by the City no later than the date and time specified in Section I. Schedule of Events in this RFP. The City will re- view and prepare a written response to each request made pursuant to this section. The City's determination will be furnished to all Proposers by the date specified in Section I. Schedule of Events in this RFP. The City reserves the right to modify or issue addenda to this RFP. If the City determines it ap- propriate to revise any portion of this RFP, either at the request of a Proposer or upon the City’s own initiative, the City will issue, and make available to all prospective Proposers, a written ad- dendum setting forth this revision. Proposer shall acknowledge